REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding Generative AI in Art: An Interview Study with Artists on G-AI from an HCI Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (G-AI) has changed the landscape of creative arts with its power to compose novel artwork and thus brought ethical concerns. Despite the efforts by prior works to address these concerns from technical and societal perspectives, there exists little discussion on this topic from an HCI point of view, considering the artists as human factors. We sought to investigate the impact of G-AI on artists, understanding the relationship between artists and G-AI, in order to motivate the underlying HCI research. We conducted semi-structured interviews with artists ($N=25$) from diverse artistic disciplines involved with G-AI in their artistic creation. We found (1) a dilemma among the artists, (2) a disparity in the understanding of G-AI between the artists and the AI developers(3) a tendency to oppose G-AI among the artists. We discuss the future opportunities of HCI research to tackle the problems identified from the interviews.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Exploratory Study on Multi-modal Generative AI in AR Storytelling
The paper maps how storytellers prefer to use AI-generated text, audio, images, videos, and 3D content to augment AR stories, based on a 223-video analysis and two user studies with 30 participants.
-
GenTune: Toward Traceable Prompts to Improve Controllability of Image Refinement in Environment Design
GenTune improves AI image refinement by tracing image regions back to prompt labels and allowing element-level, semantic-guided edits.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.