Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Revisiting the Gelman-Rubin Diagnostic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.09384 v3 pith:6U3ZF244 submitted 2018-12-21 stat.CO stat.ME

classification stat.COstat.ME
keywords gelman-rubinstatisticdiagnosticcarlochainestimatorsimmediateimproved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gelman and Rubin's (1992) convergence diagnostic is one of the most popular methods for terminating a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler. Since the seminal paper, researchers have developed sophisticated methods for estimating variance of Monte Carlo averages. We show that these estimators find immediate use in the Gelman-Rubin statistic, a connection not previously established in the literature. We incorporate these estimators to upgrade both the univariate and multivariate Gelman-Rubin statistics, leading to improved stability in MCMC termination time. An immediate advantage is that our new Gelman-Rubin statistic can be calculated for a single chain. In addition, we establish a one-to-one relationship between the Gelman-Rubin statistic and effective sample size. Leveraging this relationship, we develop a principled termination criterion for the Gelman-Rubin statistic. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our improved diagnostic via examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical consistency of sign-switching vacuum energy with cosmological observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using exact non-Gaussian shift and posterior predictive tests, ΛsCDM improves CMB–BAO consistency and softens but does not resolve the Hubble tension, which persists at p≈4×10⁻⁴.

  2. Updated observational constraints on $\phi$CDM dynamical dark energy cosmological models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Updated φCDM constraints from Planck 2018 + non-CMB data find α=0.055±0.041, consistent with a cosmological constant and only mildly favoring evolving quintessence.

Pith tools