Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Generating and Weaving Topological Event Wavepackets in Photonic Spacetime Crystals with Fully Energy-Momentum Gapped

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spacetime kinks in photonic spacetime crystals trap wavepackets in a full energy-momentum gap.

desk verdict Novel idea for linear spacetime-localized topological events, but the central ansatz does not satisfy the authors' own equation, so the paper's main results are unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15309 v1 pith:6UU2OHD7 submitted 2025-07-21 physics.optics

Liang Zhang , Zirui Zhao , Qiaofei Pan , Chenhao Pan , Qingqing Cheng , Yiming Pan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords photonicspacetimecrystalstopologicaleventwavepacketsenergy-momentumgapwindingnumberdomain-wallboundstatesmetrologynoisesuppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a class of topological excitations called topological event wavepackets (TEWs) in photonic spacetime crystals, media whose refractive index is modulated periodically in both space and time. When the modulation amplitudes form a spacetime kink, a wavepacket can be trapped at the kink in both space and time, even though the system has a fully opened energy-momentum gap in which ordinary steady states do not exist. The trapped state is exponentially localized, with widths set by the modulation strengths and frequencies, and is protected by a spacetime winding number rather than by the usual band-structure topology. The spectral width of the TEW is shown to track the size of the gap, giving a direct measurement route for the gap, and weaving kinks periodically into an event lattice suppresses the noise amplification that otherwise destabilizes such systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spacetime kink treated as a sign flip in two effective mass terms. The modulation amplitudes $\delta_1(t)$ and $\delta_2(x)$ are collected into a mass vector $\boldsymbol{\delta}=(\delta_1,\delta_2)$, and their sign changes form a cross-shaped domain wall in the $(x,t)$ plane. The paper assigns the configuration a spacetime winding number $w=\frac{1}{2\pi}\oint_C \nabla_{x,t}\theta\cdot d\boldsymbol{l}$ with $\theta=\tan^{-1}(\delta_1/\delta_2)$, where the contour encircles the kink; for the kink configuration $w=1$. The analytical TEW is obtained by replacing the smooth profiles with sign functions, solving the Dirac-type equation in the four quadrants, and matching the spinor components across the boundaries to enforce physical admissibility. This yields the exponentially localized solution, while the winding number is what is claimed to protect it against perturbations.

What would settle it

Solve the full modulated wave equation, not the reduced Dirac-type system, with the smooth profiles $\delta_1=\kappa_1\tanh(10t)$ and $\delta_2=\kappa_2\tanh(10x)$ at the paper's simulation parameters; if no exponentially localized packet appears at the kink, or if $\Delta k$ and $\Delta\omega$ do not scale linearly with $\kappa_2$ and $\kappa_1$, the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the intersection of a spatial and a temporal kink, where the effective modulation strengths $\delta_1(t)=\kappa_1\tanh(10t)$ and $\delta_2(x)=\kappa_2\tanh(10x)$ each change sign, the paper constructs an exact normalized bound state $$\psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}(1,-i,1,i)^T e^{-|\kappa_1|Gct/8-|\kappa_2|\$\Omega$ x/(8c)}$$ inside the fully opened $\omega k$-gap. The packet is exponentially localized in both dimensions, with RMS widths $\Delta t_{\mathrm{RMS}}=8/(\sqrt{2}\,\kappa_1 Gc)$ and $\Delta x_{\mathrm{RMS}}=8c/(\sqrt{2}\,\kappa_2\Omega)$, and its spatial and temporal spectral widths $\Delta k=\kappa_2\Omega/(8c)$ and $\Delta\omega=\kappa_1 Gc/8$ are approximately half the corresponding gap widths. The localization is protected by a spacetime winding number built from the phase of the mass vector; for the kink profile the winding number is $w=1$. Numerical simulations of the Dirac-type equation seeded by a weak Gaussian wavepacket form the TEW at the kink, preserve it under inhomogeneous kink profiles and under $w=-1$, and place its Fourier spectrum entirely inside the gap. The authors also show that periodically weaving kinks into an event lattice suppresses the exponential noise amplification characteristic of $\omega k$-gapped systems, with a nonmonotonic dependence on the temporal repetition period and an optimum near $T_R=18T$.

Load-bearing premise

The clean exponential TEW and the linear width formulas rely on replacing the smooth kink profiles with abrupt step changes and stitching solutions across the four quadrants, and the paper provides no matching calculation or error estimate for that replacement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A linear medium alone can host strongly localized, topologically protected event-like excitations, so TEWs should be experimentally easier to create than the nonlinear event solitons of prior work.
  • Because the TEW's spectral RMS widths are proportional to modulation strengths and roughly half the gap widths, measuring $\Delta\omega$ and $\Delta k$ from a single emitted packet yields the size of the energy-momentum gap without band-edge scans.
  • Weaving kinks periodically creates an event lattice that can suppress noise amplification inside the $\omega k$-gap, with the strongest suppression for short repetition periods and again near $T_R\approx 18T$.
  • TEWs survive inhomogeneous kink profiles and reversed winding number, indicating that the protection is topological rather than dependent on the precise profile shape.
  • In a fully gapped spacetime crystal, a weak seed placed at the kink is amplified into a TEW rather than into uncontrolled exponential growth, giving a route to stabilize energy-momentum-gapped systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the sharp-kink approximation would be to continue the slope parameter in smooth profiles like $\tanh(ax)$ and $\tanh(bt)$ and check whether the TEW decay rates approach the sign-function values continuously; the paper gives no such continuity calculation.
  • The same winding-number construction should extend to (2+1)-dimensional spacetime modulations, where the cross-shaped domain wall becomes an event surface and the contour winding number becomes a surface integral, possibly localizing a wavepacket in two spatial dimensions and time.
  • The gap-metrology claim suggests a practical protocol for time-varying media: launch a weak seed at a kink, measure the spectral width of the emitted TEW, and use the linear relation to infer the gap size without scanning band edges.
  • The event-lattice stabilization mechanism may be transferable to other fully gapped spatiotemporal systems as a general strategy of placing topological defects to absorb or redirect the noise that would otherwise grow exponentially inside the gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes "topological event wavepackets" (TEWs) in photonic spacetime crystals with a fully opened energy-momentum (ω-k) gap. The authors derive a 4×4 Dirac-type coupled-mode system, claim a normalized analytical TEW solution (Eq. 4), introduce a spacetime winding number for protection, and propose that the spectral widths Δk and Δω of the TEW directly measure the gap widths. They also propose weaving TEWs into an event lattice to suppress noise amplification. The central analytical claim is that Eq. (4), an exponential localized at the spacetime kink, solves the Dirac-type system in a piecewise constant approximation and yields the scaling Δk = κ2Ω/(8c), Δω = κ1Gc/8.

Significance. The problem addressed—stabilizing the intrinsic instabilities of fully ω-k-gapped photonic spacetime crystals—is timely and relevant, and the idea of a linear, topologically protected event wavepacket is conceptually attractive. The numerical simulations in Fig. 2 do show a localized object forming at the kink, and the proposed event lattice (Fig. 3) is a creative approach to noise suppression. If the central analytic solution were correct, the gap-metrology proposal would be a useful experimental tool. However, the core analytic result is not established, and the spectral-width scaling is essentially restated from the ansatz rather than derived from the gap structure, so the paper's main claims currently rest on an unsupported foundation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Topological Event Wavepackets, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) is not a solution of the Dirac-type system (2) in the sharp-kink idealization. Direct substitution in the quadrant x>0, t>0, with δ1=κ1, δ2=κ2 and r=1 (Ω=G=c=1), gives for the first equation of (2) a residual -i κ2/4 u, where u = (1/2)exp(-κ1 t/8 - κ2 x/8). The other components also give nonzero residuals. Thus the claimed normalized analytical TEW does not satisfy the governing equations even in the piecewise-constant approximation the authors invoke. The sentence "This yields a normalized analytical solution" is therefore unsupported, and the subsequent results built on Eq. (4)—the localization widths, the spectral scaling, and the gap-metrology interpretation—do not follow.
  2. [Topological Event Wavepackets, Eq. (4) and normalization] The proposed TEW ψ ∝ exp(-|κ1|Gct/8 - |κ2|Ωx/(8c)) grows exponentially as t → -∞ or as x → -∞, so it is not a normalizable bound state on the full (x,t) plane. A genuine spatiotemporal bound state would need to decay in all four directions away from the kink. The paper gives no matching calculation for the four quadrants, and, as shown above, the exponential form fails pointwise in each quadrant, so the sharp-kink regularization cannot repair the problem.
  3. [Protection of TEWs, Eq. (5) and spectral widths] The spacetime winding number w = (1/2π)∮∇θ·dl is merely asserted to protect the TEW; no index theorem or spectral argument connects this phase winding of the scalar pair (δ1,δ2) to the existence or stability of a solution of the 4×4 system. In the standard Jackiw–Rebbi model the zero mode is guaranteed by chiral symmetry and an index theorem; here no such mechanism is demonstrated. In addition, the reported scaling Δk = κ2Ω/(8c) and Δω = κ1Gc/8 is exactly the decay rate appearing in the ansatz Eq. (4), so the "excellent agreement" in Fig. 2f restates the ansatz rather than providing an independent verification of the gap-metrology claim. The statement that these widths are "approximately half the widths of the momentum and energy bandgaps" is not derived from Eq. (3) or from any independent measurement of the gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors that should be corrected, including "nolinearity", "remporally", "spactime", "enginering", "address this challenges", and "the wavefunction".
  2. [Eq. (2) and notation] The notation is inconsistent: the manuscript uses c_r in Eq. (2) but c and r = Ω/(Gc) elsewhere, and the compact operator form contains a different time-derivative coefficient ((ir/(Gc))∂t versus iΩ/c_r^2 ∂t). The relationship between these formulations should be clarified.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The derivation of the dispersion relation Eq. (3) from Eq. (2) is not shown. Since the paper relies on the fully opened ω-k gap, a brief derivation or at least a statement of the plane-wave substitution and resulting determinant would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Figure 3] The claim of optimal noise suppression near TR ≈ 18T is based on a single numerical scan; no error bars, no discussion of parameter sensitivity, and no physical explanation for the non-monotonic behavior are provided. This should be either analyzed or explicitly labeled as a numerical observation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation chain is internally generated and numerically checked, with self-citations only contextual.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: Maxwell's equations are reduced to a modulated wave equation, then via a Floquet-Bloch ansatz to the Dirac-type system (2), from which the dispersion relation (3) and gap modes are obtained. The topological-event solution (4) is introduced by a Jackiw-Rebbi-style ansatz with sign-function kinks and is then tested by direct numerical simulation of the Dirac-type equation with smooth tanh kinks and a weak Gaussian seed. The spectral-width scalings Δk=κ2Ω/8c and Δω=κ1Gc/8 are read off the envelope of this ansatz, not fitted to the numerical data; the simulation's agreement with those scalings is an independent check, albeit of the same model. The self-citations ([29], [39], [45]) are contextual and do not carry the derivation; no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked. The asserted 'approximately half the gap width' relation and the fact that (4) does not satisfy (2) pointwise are correctness and completeness concerns, not circularity: the gap width is not defined in terms of the TEW width, and the numerical check is not a fitted input. Under the rubric that circularity requires Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central construction is not self-contained: the Maxwell-to-Dirac reduction, the sign-function idealization, and the winding-number invariant are all assumptions layered on top of one another. The two modulation amplitudes κ1,κ2 do double duty as both gap-defining inputs and TEW width parameters, which is why the proposed gap measurement is not fully independent.

free parameters (5)
  • κ1 (temporal kink amplitude) = 0.3 in simulations
    Sets the temporal mass and therefore the TEW temporal width and claimed energy-gap width; chosen for visibility, not derived.
  • κ2 (spatial kink amplitude) = 0.3 in simulations
    Sets the spatial mass and therefore the TEW spatial width and claimed momentum-gap width; the same parameter is used to define both the gap and the packet.
  • r = Ω/(Gc) = 1
    Resonance condition chosen to open a full ωk gap; other values change the gap topology.
  • kink steepness = 10 in tanh(10t), tanh(10x)
    Chosen to approach a sign function; no physical basis is given and no sensitivity analysis is shown.
  • seed width σ = 10
    Initial Gaussian width in the simulations; arbitrary but not part of the claimed central result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Maxwell's equations reduce to the factorized modulated wave equation with ε1=εr(1+δ1 cos Ωt)(1+δ2 cos Gx) and ε̃^{-1}≈1-δ1 cos Ωt.
    Stated at the start of the energy-momentum gap section; all later results inherit this reduction.
  • domain assumption Slowly varying envelope approximation with δ1,δ2≪1 converts the wave equation to the 4x4 Dirac-type equation (2).
    The simulations use κ=0.3, which is not much smaller than 1, so the small-modulation premise is strained.
  • ad hoc to paper Smooth kinks tanh(10t), tanh(10x) can be replaced by sgn(t), sgn(x) without changing the topological result.
    This sharp-kink idealization produces Eq. 4, but the matching calculation is omitted and no convergence test is shown.
  • standard math Jackiw-Rebbi zero-mode theorem applies to the 4x4 spinor operator with two crossed sign-function masses.
    Invoked via Refs. 41-42, but the four-component spin structure is not the textbook single-component case.
  • ad hoc to paper The spacetime winding number w=(1/2π)∮∇θ·dl is a valid topological invariant for the dissipative gap modes.
    No rigorous definition for non-Hermitian or amplifying modes is supplied; the contour encloses the kink crossing.
invented entities (2)
  • Topological event wavepacket (TEW)
    purpose: A localized, topologically protected excitation at a spacetime kink inside the fully gapped region.
    No experiment or full-wave simulation is provided, and the claimed analytic form fails a direct substitution test.
  • Spacetime winding number w
    purpose: Topological invariant for protection of TEWs, computed from the phase of the mass vector (δ1,δ2).
    Mathematical characterization only; not measured and not extended rigorously to the dissipative regime.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generating and Weaving Topological Event Wavepackets in Photonic Spacetime Crystals with Fully Energy-Momentum Gapped." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6UU2OHD7

@misc{pith2026250715309,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generating and Weaving Topological Event Wavepackets in Photonic Spacetime Crystals with Fully Energy-Momentum Gapped},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6UU2OHD7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15309}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a novel type of topological excitation topological event wavepackets (TEWs) emerging in photonic spacetime crystals (STCs) with spacetime modulated dielectric constants. These TEWs exhibit strong spatiotemporal localization and are topologically protected by a fully opened energy momentum ({\omega}k) gap, within which conventional steady states are absent. We further demonstrate that TEWs are spectrally confined within the {\omega}k-gap, providing a combined measurement for probing the emergence of TEW and the {\omega}k-gap size. Furthermore, we construct a spacetime winding number to elucidate the protection of these events. Unlike previously reported nolinearity-induced event solitons, TEWs originate from topological configuration for linear media, thereby more accessible and versatile for experimental realization. Moreover, we show that TEWs can be periodically woven to form an event lattice, enabling to suppress unwanted noise amplification. Our findings open a new pathway toward topological control in photonic spacetime-modulated systems, enabling the {\omega}k-gap band enginering for wave manipulation ranging from microwave to optical regimes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F. R. Morgenthaler, Velocity modulation of electromagnetic waves, IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 6, 167 (1958)

    1958

  2. [2]

    Holberg and K

    D. Holberg and K. Kunz, Parametric properties of fields in a slab of time-varying permittivity, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 14, 183 (1966)

    work page 1966

  3. [3]

    Felsen and G

    L. Felsen and G. Whitman, Wave propagation in time -varying media, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 18, 242 (1970)

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Fante, Transmission of electromagnetic waves into time-varying media, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 19, 417 (1971)

    R. Fante, Transmission of electromagnetic waves into time-varying media, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 19, 417 (1971)

    work page 1971

  5. [5]

    E. Yablonovitch, Accelerating reference frame for electromagnetic waves in a rapidly growing plasma: Unruh -Davies-Fulling-DeWitt radiation and the nonadiabatic Casimir effect, Phys Rev Lett 62, 1742 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    J. T. Mendonça and P. K. Shukla, Time refraction and time reflection: two basic concepts, Phys Scr 65, 160 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Weinstein, Linear signal stretching in a time -variant system, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory 12, 157 (1965)

    H. Weinstein, Linear signal stretching in a time -variant system, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory 12, 157 (1965)

    work page 1965

  8. [8]

    Elliott and J

    B. Elliott and J. Gunn, Signal Processing with a Time-Varying Transmission Line, in 1966 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers, V ol. 9 (IEEE, 1966), pp. 20–21

    work page 1966

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    E. S. Cassedy and A. A. Oliner, Dispersion relations in time-space periodic media: Part I—Stable interactions, Proceedings of the IEEE 51, 1342 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    Biancalana, A

    F. Biancalana, A. Amann, A. V Uskov, and E. P. O’reilly, Dynamics of light propagation in spatiotemporal dielectric structures, Physical Review E — Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 75, 046607 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    A. M. Shaltout, J. Fang, A. V Kildishev, and V . M. Shalaev, Photonic Time- Crystals and Momentum Band -Gaps, in CLEO: QELS_Fundamental Science (Optica Publishing Group, 2016), pp. FM1D-4

    2016

  4. [12]

    L. Zeng, J. Xu, C. Wang, J. Zhang, Y . Zhao, J. Zeng, and R. Song, Photonic time crystals, Sci Rep 7, 17165 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Ma and Z

    J. Ma and Z. -G. Wang, Band structure and topological phase transition of photonic time crystals, Opt Express 27, 12914 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Dikopoltsev, Y

    A. Dikopoltsev, Y . Sharabi, M. Lyubarov, Y . Lumer, S. Tsesses, E. Lustig, I. Kaminer, and M. Segev, Light emission by free electrons in photonic time - crystals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119705119 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Lyubarov, Y

    M. Lyubarov, Y . Lumer, A. Dikopoltsev, E. Lustig, Y . Sharabi, and M. Segev, Amplified emission and lasing in photonic time crystals, Science (1979) 377, 425 (2022)

    1979

  8. [16]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alù, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time -varying media, Advanced Photonics 4, 14002 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Lustig, O

    E. Lustig, O. Segal, S. Saha, C. Fruhling, V . M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Segev, Photonic time -crystals-fundamental concepts, Opt Express 31, 9165 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    S. Saha, O. Segal, C. Fruhling, E. Lustig, M. Segev, A. Boltasseva, and V . M. Shalaev, Photonic time crystals: a materials perspective, Opt Express 31, 8267 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Boltasseva, V

    A. Boltasseva, V . M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, Photonic time crystals: from fundamental insights to novel applications: opinion, Opt Mater Express 14, 592 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    J. R. Reyes-Ayona and P. Halevi, Observation of genuine wave vector (k or β) gap in a dynamic transmission line and temporal photonic crystals, Appl Phys Lett 107, (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. R. Reyes -Ayona and P. Halevi, Electromagnetic wave propagation in an externally modulated low -pass transmission line, IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 64, 3449 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    X. Wang, M. S. Mirmoosa, V . S. Asadchy, C. Rockstuhl, S. Fan, and S. A. Tretyakov, Metasurface-based realization of photonic time crystals, Sci Adv 9, eadg7541 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Caloz and Z

    C. Caloz and Z. -L. Deck -Léger, Spacetime metamaterials —part I: general concepts, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 68, 1569 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Caloz and Z.-L

    C. Caloz and Z.-L. Deck-Leger, Spacetime metamaterials—Part II: Theory and applications, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 68, 1583 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    A. Mock, D. Sounas, and A. Alù, Magnet-free circulator based on spatiotemporal modulation of photonic crystal defect cavities, ACS Photonics 6, 2056 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    D. Oue, K. Ding, and J. B. Pendry, Calculating spatiotemporally modulated surfaces: A dynamical differential formalism, Phys Rev A (Coll Park) 104, 013509 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Sharabi, A

    Y . Sharabi, A. Dikopoltsev, E. Lustig, Y . Lumer, and M. Segev, Spatiotemporal photonic crystals, Optica 9, 585 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    M. H. Mostafa, M. S. Mirmoosa, E. Galiffi, S. Yin, A. Alù, and S. A. Tretyakov, Broadband amplification of light through adiabatic spatiotemporal modulation, ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2506.20358 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Zhang, Z

    L. Zhang, Z. Fan, and Y . Pan, Event Soliton Formation in Mixed Energy - Momentum Gaps of Nonlinear Spacetime Crystals, ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2503.16113 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Segal, Y

    O. Segal, Y . Plotnik, E. Lustig, Y . Sharabi, M.-I. Cohen, A. Dikopoltsev, and M. Segev, 2D Topological Edge States in Periodic Space -Time Interfaces, ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2506.03986 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    H. Wang, C. Guo, and S. Fan, Spatiotemporal steering of nondiffracting wave packets, Phys Rev Lett 134, 073803 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nat Photonics 8, 821 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    A. B. Khanikaev and G. Shvets, Two -dimensional topological photonics, Nat Photonics 11, 763 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, and O. Zilberberg, Topological photonics, Rev Mod Phys 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measurement of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nat Phys 9, 795 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Surface impedance and bulk band geometric phases in one-dimensional systems, Phys Rev X 4, 021017 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Lustig, Y

    E. Lustig, Y . Sharabi, and M. Segev, Topological aspects of photonic time crystals, Optica 5, 1390 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    M. Lin, S. Ahmed, M. Jamil, Z. Liang, Q. Wang, and Z. Ouyang, Temporally - topological defect modes in photonic time crystals, Opt Express 32, 9820 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Y . Ren, K. Ye, Q. Chen, F. Chen, L. Zhang, Y . Pan, W. Li, X. Li, L. Zhang, and H. Chen, Observation of temporal topological boundary states of light in a momentum bandgap, ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2402.14255 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. Feis, S. Weidemann, T. Sheppard, H. M. Price, and A. Szameit, Space -time- topological events in photonic quantum walks, Nat Photonics 1 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number ½, Physical Review D 13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  34. [42]

    Shen, Topological Insulators, V ol

    S.-Q. Shen, Topological Insulators, V ol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Charmchi and S

    F. Charmchi and S. S. Gousheh, Complete spectral analysis of the Jackiw-Rebbi model, including its zero mode, Physical Review D 89, 025002 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Gonzalez, J

    G. Gonzalez, J. Mendez, R. Diaz, and F. J. Gonzalez, Electrostatic simulation of the Jackiw-Rebbi zero energy state, Revista Mexicana de Física E 65, 30 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y . Pan, Q. Wang, T. Li, and S. Zhu, Topologically protected interface mode in plasmonic waveguide arrays, Laser Photon Rev 9, 392 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    Quesada and J

    N. Quesada and J. E. Sipe, Why you should not use the electric field to quantize in nonlinear optics, Opt Lett 42, 3443 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    F. P. Bretherton, Propagation in slowly varying waveguides, Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 302, 555 (1968)

    1968

  40. [48]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Donaldson, and G. P. Agrawal, Conservation law for electromagnetic fields in a space -time-varying medium and its implications, Phys Rev A (Coll Park) 110, 043526 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Ptitcyn, M

    G. Ptitcyn, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. Sotoodehfar, and S. A. Tretyakov, A tutorial on the basics of time -varying electromagnetic systems and circuits: Historic overview and basic concepts of time -modulation, IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 65, 10 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    R. J. Schoelkopf, P. Wahlgren, A. A. Kozhevnikov, P. Delsing, and D. E. Prober, The radio -frequency single -electron transistor (RF -SET): A fast and ultrasensitive electrometer, Science (1979) 280, 1238 (1998)

    1979

  43. [51]

    Liberal and N

    I. Liberal and N. Engheta, Near -zero refractive index photonics, Nat Photonics 11, 149 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    V . R. Almeida, C. A. Barrios, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, All-optical control of light on a silicon chip, Nature 431, 1081 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    E. L. Wooten, K. M. Kissa, A. Yi -Yan, E. J. Murphy, D. A. Lafaw, P. F. Hallemeier, D. Maack, D. V Attanasio, D. J. Fritz, and G. J. McBrien, A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber -optic communications systems, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics ...

    2000

  46. [54]

    D. S. Ginley and C. Bright, Transparent conducting oxides, MRS Bull 25, 15 (2000)

    2000

  47. [55]

    Lebeau and P

    B. Lebeau and P. Innocenzi, Hybrid materials for optics and photonics, Chem Soc Rev 40, 886 (2011). Figure 1 | Schematic comparison of topological defects and band structures of distinct photonic crystal s. The topological defects are: (a) Spatial topological edge state in pho...

    2011

  48. [64]

    spatiotemporal weaving

    (3) This dispersion relation reveals the mode hybridization and band engineering induced by both temporal and spatial modulations [Fig. 1f]. In particular, when the modulation ratio 𝑟 → 1, forward/backward and time-reflection/refraction waves become strongly coupled, resulting...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.