Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 105 references

Additional Food Enhances the Bifurcation Structure of Predator Competition Models

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that adding extra food to a predator–prey model with predator competition drives it through a codimension-4 cusp-type Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation, where three distinct population cycles can coexist.

desk verdict Solid codim-3 result for p=2, but the claimed codim-4 cusp rests on an unverified γ3=0; needs verification or downgrade. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18613 v1 pith:6ZRUSCT6 submitted 2026-07-21 q-bio.PE

classification q-bio.PE MSC 34C2337G1592D25
keywords additionalfoodpredatorcompetitionBogdanov-TakensbifurcationhighercodimensionlimitcyclesHollingtypeIIfunctionalresponsesoybeanaphidbiologicalcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes a predator–prey system where predators receive additional food and also compete through a generalized nonlinearity (−y^p with 1 < p ≤ 2). It establishes that the system can have up to three interior equilibria and that a double equilibrium can organize a cusp-type Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation of codimension at least 4, together with a Hopf bifurcation of codimension 3 and a homoclinic bifurcation of codimension 3. The direct consequence is that three limit cycles — at least two of them stable — can coexist around that organizing center. The authors connect this to the two distinct population cycles observed in soybean aphid field data, suggesting that supplementary food could be a practical management lever, not just a suppression input.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fourth-order cusp normal form ẋ = y, ẏ = μ1 + μ2 y + x² + μ3 x y + μ4 x³ y − x⁴ y + R(x, y, λ), obtained by successive near-identity transformations and time rescalings of the original model. This normal form is a known organizing center whose full bifurcation set is understood: it yields the codimension-one Hopf and homoclinic surfaces, their codimension-two intersections, and a topological three-simplex region in which three limit cycles coexist. Around it, the paper computes Lyapunov coefficients to locate the codimension-3 Hopf point and evaluates a Melnikov integral along the unperturbed homoclinic loop to locate the codimension-3 homoclinic point.

What would settle it

Compute γ3 exactly, or with rigorous interval arithmetic, at Ed = (2.1983868, 3.2140684) with p = 1.4 and (η, δ, c, K, α, ξ) = (3.5700505, 1.6070648, 1.3311815, 46.409597, 0.26, 0.675); a nonzero value disproves codimension 4. A complementary check is to continue the double-limit-cycle curve in (δ, c) and verify that the two Lyapunov coefficients vanish together at the predicted codimension-3 Hopf point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the additional-food predator-competition model, ẋ = x(1 − x/K) − xy/(1 + x + αξ), ẏ = ηy(x + ξ)/(1 + x + αξ) − δy − cξy^p, with 1 < p ≤ 2, admits a double interior equilibrium that is a cusp-type Bogdanov–Takens singularity of codimension at least 4 (a degenerate double-zero eigenvalue singularity where the quadratic cusp coefficient also vanishes). For p = 1.4 and (η, δ, c, K, α, ξ) = (3.5700505, 1.6070648, 1.3311815, 46.409597, 0.26, 0.675), the equilibrium Ed = (2.1983868, 3.2140684) has vanishing trace and determinant; the paper derives a four-parameter universal unfolding with η, δ, K, c as unfolding parameters and identifies the same point as the sourc

Load-bearing premise

The claimed fourth-order degeneracy depends on one normal-form coefficient being exactly zero at the chosen parameter set; if that coefficient is not exactly zero, the singularity is only third-order.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the codimension-4 cusp exists, four parameters — prey growth rate, predator death rate, carrying capacity, and competition strength — must be tuned together to pass through the organizing center; small simultaneous changes can completely rearrange the bifurcation portrait.
  • Around the Bogdanov–Takens point the model admits three limit cycles, at least two of which can be stable, so the model predicts alternating stable population cycles rather than a single oscillation.
  • The codimension-3 Hopf and homoclinic bifurcations mean that sustained cycles are created or destroyed along entire surfaces in parameter space, making oscillatory regimes robust rather than exceptional.
  • For p = 2, the triple equilibrium yields a focus-type Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation of codimension 3 with an explicit three-parameter unfolding, showing that the classical quadratic competition case already contains more degeneracy than previously proved.
  • Two stable limit cycles offer a dynamical explanation for the two distinct amplitude cycles seen in soybean aphid field data across different management phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the codimension-4 claim is contingent on verifying γ3 = 0 at the chosen parameter set; the paper presents only a numerical plot suggesting the coefficient could vanish, so an exact or interval-arithmetic computation is needed to settle it.
  • If γ3 turns out nonzero, the same model still exhibits a codimension-3 cusp with a three-parameter unfolding, and the three-limit-cycle region would persist with one fewer free parameter — so the broad biological message would survive, but the organizing center would be less degenerate.
  • The model's two stable cycles suggest a testable management prediction: timing pesticide applications or parasitoid releases to the phase of the inner versus outer cycle should yield different control outcomes, and the model could be fitted to the North-Central soybean aphid time series to check whether the data fall inside the three-cycle region.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the predator-prey model (1.2) with a type-II functional response, additional food, and a generalized predator competition term -c ξ y^p, 1<p≤2. It claims (i) at most three interior equilibria, (ii) a cusp-type Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation of codimension at least 4 at a double equilibrium for p=1.4, together with a four-parameter universal unfolding, (iii) a codimension-3 degenerate Hopf bifurcation and a codimension-3 homoclinic bifurcation near that organizing center, and (iv) for p=2 a focus-type degenerate Bogdanov–Takens singularity of codimension 3 with a three-parameter unfolding. The analytical normal-form computations are supplemented by Matcont bifurcation diagrams and phase portraits, and the results are discussed in relation to soybean aphid field data and biological control.

Significance. If the codimension-4 cusp claim is correct, the paper would substantially extend the known bifurcation repertoire of additional-food predator-prey models: the abstract's headline of a cusp-type BT point of codimension at least 4, a codimension-3 Hopf bifurcation, and a codimension-3 homoclinic bifurcation would provide a new organizing center for multiple limit cycles in a biologically motivated model. The p=2 focus-type BT analysis in Section 6 is a genuine strength: it relies on explicit positivity conditions and standard normal-form criteria rather than numerical degeneracy, and the algebraic transformations are given in detail. The paper also makes a useful systematic comparison with prior Bazykin and additional-food models (Table 1). However, the central codimension-4 claim is conditional on the unverified condition γ3=0, so the significance of the strongest advertised result is currently not established.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 5.2.1 / Section 8, Corollary 5.7 and biological interpretation] Corollary 5.7 is proved for the local truncated normal form (5.47) under the codimension-4 cusp assumption. The biological application in Section 8 then states that a second limit cycle 'is guaranteed' by Corollary 5.7 and that the model 'could match' the two observed aphid cycles. This is an overstatement: no parameter-fitting to the aphid data is performed, and the normal-form result is local and conditional on γ3=0. I would ask the authors to soften this to 'is consistent with' or 'may support,' and to state explicitly that the field-data connection is illustrative rather than a quantitative validation. This does not affect the mathematical content but matters for a q-bio readership.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and spacing issues: 'Pred ator' in the title, 'occurrance' in Section 1.2, 'it’s' for 'its' in Corollary 5.8, and 'Matcont' should be 'MATCONT.' These should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 3] The caption says 'γ3 as a function of xd' but does not mark the selected value xd=2.1983868 or the claimed root. Please mark both and report γ3(xd) at the equilibrium with enough precision.
  3. [Appendix 9.10/9.11] The coefficients hij, pij, qij are given as rounded decimals. If the authors retain the codimension-4 claim, they should provide exact or higher-precision values, and ideally a script that reproduces them from (1.2), so that the normal-form reduction is auditable.
  4. [Section 4] The paper says degenerate Hopf analysis is omitted 'due to algebraic complexity' but later derives a codimension-3 Hopf bifurcation from the BT normal form. This is acceptable, but the sentence should be phrased more carefully to avoid implying the earlier Lyapunov-coefficient approach is the only route.
  5. [References] Reference [23] has a typographical artifact ('T (w ) o patch'), and several arXiv preprints are cited as 'Under Review'; please give the most stable available versions or DOIs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the codim-4 claim is conditional on an unverified γ3=0, but that is a verification gap, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained relative to the external normal-form and bifurcation literature. The model (1.2) is introduced as a generalization of the authors' earlier AF-competition models [73,74], but the equilibrium analysis, normal-form reductions, and unfoldings are derived directly from the stated ODE via explicit coordinate changes and cited external theorems (e.g., [89,90,92,96]). No model parameter is fitted to the soybean-aphid field data; the biological discussion is qualitative and does not feed back into the mathematical construction. Self-citations [73,74] are used for model provenance and prior special cases, not as load-bearing justification for the new bifurcation results, and no 'uniqueness theorem' is imported from the authors' own prior work. The main caveat is the codimension-4 cusp claim in Section 5.1: the paper states, 'by plotting γ3 as a function of xd, as shown in Fig. 3, we see that γ3 could also vanish,' and then proceeds 'by assuming γ3 = 0' before computing γ4 = -2.92196 and declaring a cusp-type Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation of codimension at least 4. This is a genuine verification gap: if γ3 ≠ 0 at Ed = (2.1983868, 3.2140684), the singularity is only codimension 3 and the four-parameter universal unfolding of Theorem 5.5 is not minimal. However, this is not circularity: the normal-form criterion 'γ3=0, γ4≠0 implies codim-4' is an external mathematical fact, and the unverified assumption is not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction nor an equation reduced to itself. The conditional theorem is valid; its hypothesis is simply not rigorously confirmed at the chosen parameter set. Thus the paper earns a low circularity score, with the main risk being correctness/completeness rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mathematical results rely on standard normal-form theory and the modeling assumption of generalized predator competition. No new particles, forces, or invented entities are introduced. The hand-picked parameter set is a free parameter of the existence proof, not fitted to biological data.

free parameters (1)
  • Exemplar parameter set (η, δ, c, K, α, ξ, p) = (3.5700505, 1.6070648, 1.3311815, 46.409597, 0.26, 0.675, 1.4)
    Hand-selected to satisfy the BT conditions and γ2 = 0 (and claimed γ3 = 0). These values are not fitted to data but are chosen to make the codim-4 example work.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Normal-form theorems for cusp singularities of order n (Li–Rousseau, Chow–Li–Wang, Joyal, Dumortier et al.)
    Cited as [90, 92, 94, 96] and used to conclude codim and limit cycles from the reduced normal form.
  • domain assumption The generalized competition term −c ξ y^p with 1 < p ≤ 2 captures predator intraspecific competition
    Motivates the model, not derived from mechanistic first principles.
  • domain assumption Holling type II functional response with additional food terms is an appropriate representation of predator feeding
    Standard ecological modeling assumption used throughout the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Additional Food Enhances the Bifurcation Structure of Predator Competition Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6ZRUSCT6

@misc{pith2026260718613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Additional Food Enhances the Bifurcation Structure of Predator Competition Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6ZRUSCT6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18613}
}
read the original abstract

Additional food sources and predator competition are both known to impact the dynamics of predator-prey models. The Bazykin model of predator competition, with Holling type II functional response, possesses a rich bifurcation structure consisting of a focus-type degenerate Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation of codimension 3, and a degenerate Hopf bifurcation of codimension at most 2. Additional food models on the other hand are able to drive pest populations lower, with vast applicability in biological control. Despite these models being studied rigorously in the literature, the global bifurcation structure, of their possible complex dynamics, in a unified model, is unknown. In this work, we study an additional food model with generalized predator competition and Holling type-II functional response. Depending on the parameter values, the system can have up to three interior equilibria. Further, we show that this system exhibits a cusp-type (or focus-type) Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation of codimension at least 4 (or 3), a global Hopf bifurcation of codimension 3, and a homoclinic bifurcation of codimension 3. This shows there could exist three limit cycles around the BT point. These results demonstrate that additional food in Bazykin type models, can enhance their bifurcation structure. We discuss the applicability of these results to integrated pest management programs for the soybean aphid, wherein long term field data in the North-Central United States, shows two distinct limit cycles in aphid populations and their predators. Our results suggest biological control with additional food, is an effective management tactic for invasive pests.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18613 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Population densities for aphids, predators, and p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphs of k(x) showing different positive root configurations that determine the number and multiplicity of interior equilibria of system (1.2). Panel (a) exhibits three distinct simple roots x1, x2, x3; panels (b) and (c) exhibit one simple root and one double root xd; panel (d) exhibits a triple root xt ; and panels (e) and (f) exhibit a unique simple root. To determine the local dynamics near an interior equilibr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The function γ3 as a function of xd for p = 1.4. Therefore, by assuming γ3 = 0 and applying Proposition 1 in [91], the system (5.21) further reduces to ( x˙ = y, y˙ = x 2 + γ4x 4 y + O(|(x, y) 6 |) (5.23) where γ4 = e41 + 1 2 e12e21 − e21e40. (5.24) For the above parameter set, γ4 = −2.92196 6= 0. Therefore, again by normal form theory in [90] and by the method in [92, 93], Ed(xd, G(xd)) corresponds to a cusp-type B… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The bifurcation diagram of system (5.48) for sufficiently small a = (a1, a2, a3). The codimension-one Hopf bifurcation surface is shown in light peach, while the light green surface represents the codimension-one homoclinic bifurcation surface. The number of limit …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-parameter bifurcation diagrams of system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase portraits corresponding to the bifurcation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bifurcation diagram of the focus-type Bogdanov-Ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Phase portraits corresponding to the bifurcation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Curbing the major and growing threats from invasive alien species is urgent and achievable

    Helen E Roy, An ´ ıbal Pauchard, Peter J Stoett, Tanara Ren ard Truong, Laura A Meyerson, Sven Bacher, Bella S Galil, Philip E Hulme, Tohru I keda, Sankaran Kavileveettil, et al. Curbing the major and growing threats from invasive alien species is urgent and achievable. Nature ecology & evolution , 8(7):1216–1223, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02412-w

  2. [2]

    Global threat to agriculture from invasiv e species

    Dean R Paini, Andy W Sheppard, David C Cook, Paul J De Barro , Susan P Worner, and Matthew B Thomas. Global threat to agriculture from invasiv e species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 113(27):7575–7579, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602205113

  3. [3]

    Upda te on the environmental and eco- nomic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the u nited states

    David Pimentel, Rodolfo Zuniga, and Doug Morrison. Upda te on the environmental and eco- nomic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the u nited states. Ecological economics, 52(3):273–288, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002

  4. [4]

    No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide

    Hanno Seebens, Tim M Blackburn, Ellie E Dyer, Piero Genov esi, Philip E Hulme, Jonathan M Jeschke, Shyama Pagad, Petr Pyˇ sek, Marten Winter, Margari ta Arianoutsou, et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature communications, 8(1): 14435, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435

  5. [5]

    Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesti- cides primarily in the united states

    David Pimentel. Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesti- cides primarily in the united states. Environ. Dev. Sustain. , 7:229–252, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-7314-2 . 46

  6. [6]

    Emerging issues in integrated pest management im- plementation and adoption in the north central usa

    Thomas W Sappington. Emerging issues in integrated pest management im- plementation and adoption in the north central usa. Integrated Pest Manage- ment: Experiences with Implementation, Global Overview, Vo l. 4 , pages 65–97, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7802-3_4

  7. [7]

    Rapid evolution to host plant resistance by an invasive herbivore: soybean aph id (aphis glycines) virulence in north america to aphid resistant cultivars

    Matthew E O’Neal, Adam J Varenhorst, and Matthew C Kaiser . Rapid evolution to host plant resistance by an invasive herbivore: soybean aph id (aphis glycines) virulence in north america to aphid resistant cultivars. Curr. Opin. Insect. Sci. , 26:1–7, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2017.12.006

  8. [8]

    Exploring the dy- namics of virulent and avirulent aphids: A case for a ‘within plant’refuge

    Aniket Banerjee, Ivair Valmorbida, Matthew E O’Neal, an d Rana Parshad. Exploring the dy- namics of virulent and avirulent aphids: A case for a ‘within plant’refuge. J. Econ. Entomol. , 115(1):279–288, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toab218

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Enviro nmental risks and chal- lenges associated with neonicotinoid insecticides

    Michelle L Hladik, Anson R Main, and Dave Goulson. Enviro nmental risks and chal- lenges associated with neonicotinoid insecticides. Environ. Sci. Technol., 52:3329–3335, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06388

  2. [10]

    The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides

    Chris Bass, Ian Denholm, Martin S Williamson, and Ralf N auen. The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. , 121:78–87, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.04.004

  3. [12]

    Predator interferenc e and the establishment of generalist predator populations for biocontrol

    William E Snyder and David H Wise. Predator interferenc e and the establishment of generalist predator populations for biocontrol. Biol. Control , 15(3):283–292, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1999.0723

  4. [13]

    Environmen- tal consequences of invasive species: greenhouse gas emiss ions of insecticide use and the role of biological control in reducing emissions

    George E Heimpel, Yi Yang, Jason D Hill, and David W Ragsd ale. Environmen- tal consequences of invasive species: greenhouse gas emiss ions of insecticide use and the role of biological control in reducing emissions. PLoS One , 8(8):e72293, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa...

  5. [14]

    When does alte rnative food promote biological pest control? IOBC WPRS BULLETIN , 29(4):195, 2006

    Maurice W Sabelis, Paul CJ Van Rijn, et al. When does alte rnative food promote biological pest control? IOBC WPRS BULLETIN , 29(4):195, 2006. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.266182

  6. [15]

    Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of par asitoids

    Alejandro Tena, Apostolos Pekas, Dalmert Cano, Felix L W¨ ackers, and Alberto Urbaneja. Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of par asitoids. J. Appl. Ecol. , 52(3): 795–804, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12426

  7. [16]

    Biologi cal control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study

    PDN Srinivasu, BSR V Prasad, and M Venkatesulu. Biologi cal control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 72(1):111–120, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2007.03.011

  8. [17]

    Time optimal control of a n additional food provided predator–prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation

    PDN Srinivasu and BSR V Prasad. Time optimal control of a n additional food provided predator–prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation. J. Math Biol. , 60(4):591–613, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0279-2 . 47

  9. [18]

    Role of quantity of addit ional food to predators as a control in predator–prey systems with relevance to pest management and biological conservation

    PDN Srinivasu and BSR V Prasad. Role of quantity of addit ional food to predators as a control in predator–prey systems with relevance to pest management and biological conservation. Bull. Math. Biol. , 73(10):2249–2276, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9601-9

  10. [19]

    Dynami cs of additional food provided predator–prey system with mutually interfering predators

    BSR V Prasad, Malay Banerjee, and PDN Srinivasu. Dynami cs of additional food provided predator–prey system with mutually interfering predators . Math. Biosci. , 246(1):176–190,

  11. [20]

    Biological cons ervation of living systems by providing additional food supplements in the presence of inhibitory effect: a theo- retical study using predator–prey models

    PDN Srinivasu, DKK Vamsi, and I Aditya. Biological cons ervation of living systems by providing additional food supplements in the presence of inhibitory effect: a theo- retical study using predator–prey models. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. , 26:213–246, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007...

  12. [21]

    Additional foo d supplements as a tool for biological conservation of predator-prey systems involving type iii functional re- sponse: A qualitative and quantitative investigation

    PDN Srinivasu, DKK Vamsi, and VS Ananth. Additional foo d supplements as a tool for biological conservation of predator-prey systems involving type iii functional re- sponse: A qualitative and quantitative investigation. J. Theor. Biol. , 455:303–318, 2018. https://doi.org/10....

  13. [22]

    Ananth and D.K.K Vamsi

    V.S. Ananth and D.K.K Vamsi. Achieving minimum-time bi ological conservation and pest management for additional food provided predator– prey systems involv- ing inhibitory effect: A qualitative investigation. Acta Biotheor. , 70(1):1–51, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-021-09430-2

  14. [23]

    T (w ) o patch or not t (w) o patch: A novel biocontrol model

    Urvashi Verma, Aniket Banerjee, and Rana D Parshad. T (w ) o patch or not t (w) o patch: A novel biocontrol model. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences , 2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.70800

  15. [24]

    ecological

    Rana D Parshad, Emmanuel Quansah, Kelly Black, and Matt hew Beauregard. Biological control via “ecological” damping: an approach that attenua tes non-target effects. Math. Biosci., 273:23–44, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2015.12.010

  16. [25]

    Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Karin M Kettenring and Carrie Reinhardt Adams. Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied ecology , 48(4):970– 979, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01979.x

  17. [26]

    Trophic consequences of introduced species: Comparative impacts o f increased interspecific ver- sus intraspecific competitive interactions

    J Robert Britton, Ana Ruiz-Navarro, Hugo Verreycken, a nd Fatima Amat-Trigo. Trophic consequences of introduced species: Comparative impacts o f increased interspecific ver- sus intraspecific competitive interactions. Functional ecology , 32(2):486–495, 2018. https://doi.org/10....

  18. [27]

    Principles for ecologically based invasive plant management

    Jeremy J James, Brenda S Smith, Edward A Vasquez, and Rog er L Sheley. Principles for ecologically based invasive plant management. Invasive Plant Science and Management , 3 (3):229–239, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-09-00027.1

  19. [28]

    Meta-analysis identifies native priority as a mechanism tha t supports the restora- tion of invasion-resistant plant communities

    Melinda Halassy, P´ eter Bat´ ary, Anik´ o Csecserits, K atalin T¨ or¨ ok, and Orsolya Valk´ o. Meta-analysis identifies native priority as a mechanism tha t supports the restora- tion of invasion-resistant plant communities. Communications biology , 6(1):1100, 2023. https://do...

  20. [29]

    Elements of applied bifurcation theory

    Yuri A Kuznetsov. Elements of applied bifurcation theory . Springer, New York, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3978-7 . 48

  21. [30]

    Nonlinear dynamics of interacting populations

    Alexander D Bazykin. Nonlinear dynamics of interacting populations . World Scientific, Sin- gapore, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1142/2284

  22. [31]

    Global analysis in bazykin’s mod el with holling ii functional response and predator competition

    Min Lu and Jicai Huang. Global analysis in bazykin’s mod el with holling ii functional response and predator competition. Journal of Differential Equations , 280:99–138, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.01.025

  23. [32]

    Analyses of bifurcat ions and stability in a predator-prey system with holling type-iv functional response

    Ji-cai Huang1 and Dong-mei Xiao2. Analyses of bifurcat ions and stability in a predator-prey system with holling type-iv functional response. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica , 20(1): 167–178, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-004-0159-x

  24. [33]

    Bifurcation a nalysis in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting

    Jicai Huang, Yijun Gong, and Shigui Ruan. Bifurcation a nalysis in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 18(8):2101–2121,

  25. [34]

    Bifurcations i n a predator–prey system of leslie type with generalized holling type iii functional response

    Jicai Huang, Shigui Ruan, and Jing Song. Bifurcations i n a predator–prey system of leslie type with generalized holling type iii functional response . J. Differ. Equ. , 257(6):1721–1752,

  26. [35]

    https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2101

  27. [36]

    Toward management guidelines for soybean aphid, aphis glycines, in quebec

    Marc Rhainds, Jacques Brodeur, Daniel Borcard, and Pie rre Legendre. Toward management guidelines for soybean aphid, aphis glycines, in quebec. ii . spatial distribution of aphid pop- ulations in commercial soybean fields. The Canadian Entomologist , 140(2):219–234, 2008. https...

  28. [37]

    Biolo gy of the soybean aphid, aphis glycines (hemiptera: Aphididae) in the united states

    KJ Tilmon, EW Hodgson, ME O’Neal, and DW Ragsdale. Biolo gy of the soybean aphid, aphis glycines (hemiptera: Aphididae) in the united states. Journal of Integrated Pest Management , 2(2):A1–A7, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/IPM10016

  29. [39]

    Eco- nomic impacts of the us soybean aphid infestation: a multi-r egional competitive dy- namic analysis

    CS Kim, Glenn Schaible, Lynn Garrett, Ruben Lubowski, a nd Donna Lee. Eco- nomic impacts of the us soybean aphid infestation: a multi-r egional competitive dy- namic analysis. Agricultural and resource economics review , 37(2):227–242, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500003026

  30. [40]

    Ecology and management of the soyb ean aphid in north america

    David W Ragsdale, Douglas A Landis, Jacques Brodeur, Ge orge E Heim- pel, and Nicolas Desneux. Ecology and management of the soyb ean aphid in north america. Annual review of entomology , 56(1):375–399, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144755

  31. [41]

    Profitability analysis of soybean aphid cont rol treatments in three north-central states, 2006

    Feng Song. Profitability analysis of soybean aphid cont rol treatments in three north-central states, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.11489

  32. [42]

    Effects of sub-lethal and lethal doses of lambda-cyhalothrin on oviposition experience and host-searching behaviour of a 49 parasitic wasp, aphidius ervi

    Nicolas Desneux, Minh-H` a Pham-Del` egue, and Laure Kaiser. Effects of sub-lethal and lethal doses of lambda-cyhalothrin on oviposition experience and host-searching behaviour of a 49 parasitic wasp, aphidius ervi. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science , 60(4): 3...

  33. [43]

    The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods

    Nicolas Desneux, Axel Decourtye, and Jean-Marie Delpu ech. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. , 52(1):81–106, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440

  34. [44]

    Choosing organic pesticides over syntheti c pesticides may not ef- fectively mitigate environmental risk in soybeans

    Christine A Bahlai, Yingen Xue, Cara M McCreary, Arthur W Schaafsma, and Re- becca H Hallett. Choosing organic pesticides over syntheti c pesticides may not ef- fectively mitigate environmental risk in soybeans. PloS one , 5(6):e11250, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pon...

  35. [45]

    The respons e of natural enemies to se- lective insecticides applied to soybean

    Adam Jerry Varenhorst and Matthew E O’Neal. The respons e of natural enemies to se- lective insecticides applied to soybean. Environmental entomology , 41(6):1565–1574, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN12068

  36. [46]

    Evidence for s oybean aphid (hemiptera: Aphididae) resistance to pyrethroid ins ecticides in the upper mid- western united states

    Anthony A Hanson, James Menger-Anderson, Celia Silver stein, Bruce D Potter, Ian V MacRae, Erin W Hodgson, and Robert L Koch. Evidence for s oybean aphid (hemiptera: Aphididae) resistance to pyrethroid ins ecticides in the upper mid- western united states. Journal of economic ...

  37. [47]

    Kevin D Johnson, Matthew E O’Neal, Jeffrey D Bradshaw, and Marlin E Rice. Is pre- ventative, concurrent management of the soybean aphid (hem iptera: Aphididae) and bean leaf beetle (coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) possible? Journal of Economic Entomology , 101(3): 801–809, 2008. htt...

  38. [48]

    Ma nagement recommendations for soybean aphid (hemiptera: Aphididae) in the united stat es

    Erin W Hodgson, BP McCornack, K Tilmon, and JJ Knodel. Ma nagement recommendations for soybean aphid (hemiptera: Aphididae) in the united stat es. Journal of integrated pest management, 3(1):E1–E10, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1603/IPM11019

  39. [49]

    Probability of cost-effective management of soybean a phid (hemiptera: Aphi- didae) in north america

    Kevin D Johnson, Matthew E O’Neal, David W Ragsdale, Chr istina D Difonzo, Scott M Swinton, Philip M Dixon, Bruce D Potter, Erin W Hodgson, and A lejandro C Costa- magna. Probability of cost-effective management of soybean a phid (hemiptera: Aphi- didae) in north america. Journ...

  40. [50]

    Soybean aphid predators and their use in integrated pes t manage- ment

    Claire E Rutledge, Robert J O’Neil, Tyler B Fox, and Doug las A Lan- dis. Soybean aphid predators and their use in integrated pes t manage- ment. Annals of the Entomological Society of America , 97(2):240–248, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0240:SAP ATU]2.0.CO;2

  41. [51]

    Asynchronous de clines of native and exotic insect predators reduce pest suppression potential in agricultur e

    Christie A Bahlai and Douglas A Landis. Asynchronous de clines of native and exotic insect predators reduce pest suppression potential in agricultur e. PNAS nexus , 5(3):pgag063, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag063

  42. [52]

    Two species competition with a” non-smooth” allee mechanism: a pplications to soybean aphid population dynamics under climate change

    Aniket Banerjee, Urvashi Verma, Margaret T Lewis, and R ana D Parshad. Two species competition with a” non-smooth” allee mechanism: a pplications to soybean aphid population dynamics under climate change. Math. Biosci. Eng. , 22(3):604–651, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.20...

  43. [53]

    Shifts in dynamic regime of an invasive lady beetle a re linked to the invasion and insecticidal management of its prey

    Christine A Bahlai, Wopke vander Werf, Matthew O’Neal, Lia Hemerik, and Douglas A Landis. Shifts in dynamic regime of an invasive lady beetle a re linked to the invasion and insecticidal management of its prey. Ecological Applications, 25(7):1807–1818, 2015. https://doi.org/10...

  44. [54]

    Predation by coccinella septempunctata an d harmonia axyridis (coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on aphis glycines (homoptera: Aphididae)

    Yingen Xue, Christine A Bahlai, A Frewin, Mark K Sears, A rthur W Schaafsma, and Re- becca H Hallett. Predation by coccinella septempunctata an d harmonia axyridis (coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on aphis glycines (homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology, 38(3): 708–714, 2...

  45. [55]

    Bifurcation analy sis of a holling type ii predator-prey model with refuge

    Debasis Mukherjee and Chandan Maji. Bifurcation analy sis of a holling type ii predator-prey model with refuge. Chinese Journal of Physics , 65:153–162, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2020.02.012

  46. [56]

    Urvashi Verma, Margaret Lewis, Jordan Lehman, and Rana D. Parshad. Towards improved pest management of the soybean aphid. Ecological Modelling, 521:111721, 2026. ISSN 0304-

  47. [57]

    Competing predato rs

    SB Hsu, SP Hubbell, and Paul Waltman. Competing predato rs. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 35(4):617–625, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1137/0135051

  48. [58]

    Intraspecific predator interference promotes biodiversity in ecosystem s

    Ju Kang, Shijie Zhang, Yiyuan Niu, Fan Zhong, and Xin Wan g. Intraspecific predator interference promotes biodiversity in ecosystem s. ELife, 13:RP93115, 2024. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.93115.3

  49. [59]

    Deterministic mathematical model s in population ecology

    Herbert I Freedman. Deterministic mathematical model s in population ecology. (No Title) , 1980

  50. [60]

    A model for tropic interaction

    Donald Lee DeAngelis, RA Goldstein, and Robert V O’Neil l. A model for tropic interaction. Ecology, 56(4):881–892, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936298

  51. [61]

    A mechanistic deriv ation of the deangelis– beddington functional response

    Stefan Geritz and Mats Gyllenberg. A mechanistic deriv ation of the deangelis– beddington functional response. Journal of theoretical biology , 314:106–108, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.08.030

  52. [62]

    Qualitative analysis of beddington–deangeli s type impulsive predator– prey models

    HK Baek. Qualitative analysis of beddington–deangeli s type impulsive predator– prey models. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications , 11(3):1312–1322, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.02.021

  53. [63]

    Bifurcation anal- ysis of a predator–prey system with generalised holling typ e iii functional re- sponse

    Yann Lamontagne, Caroline Coutu, and Christiane Rouss eau. Bifurcation anal- ysis of a predator–prey system with generalised holling typ e iii functional re- sponse. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations , 20(3):535–571, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-008-9102-9

  54. [64]

    Multiple bifurcation s of a predator- prey system

    Dongmei Xiao and Kate Fang Zhang. Multiple bifurcation s of a predator- prey system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-B , 8(2):417–433, 2007. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.417

  55. [65]

    Bifurc ations of a predator- prey system with weak allee effects

    Rongzhen Lin, Shengqiang Liu, and Xiaohong Lai. Bifurc ations of a predator- prey system with weak allee effects. J. Korean Math. Soc , 50(4):695–713, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/JKMS.2013.50.4.695. 51

  56. [66]

    A predator-prey system with generalized holling type iv functional response and allee e ffects in prey

    Alessandro Arsie, Chanaka Kottegoda, and Chunhua Shan . A predator-prey system with generalized holling type iv functional response and allee e ffects in prey. J. Differ. Equ. , 309: 704–740, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.11.041

  57. [67]

    High codimension bifurcations of a predator–prey system with generalized ho lling type iii func- tional response and allee effects

    Alessandro Arsie, Chanaka Kottegoda, and Chunhua Shan . High codimension bifurcations of a predator–prey system with generalized ho lling type iii func- tional response and allee effects. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. , 35(4):3355–3380, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10214-6

  58. [68]

    Bifurcat ion analysis of a gen- eralized gause model with prey harvesting and a generalized holling response function of type iii

    Remy Magloire Etoua and Christiane Rousseau. Bifurcat ion analysis of a gen- eralized gause model with prey harvesting and a generalized holling response function of type iii. Journal of Differential Equations , 249(9):2316–2356, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2010.06.021

  59. [69]

    Sureni D Wickramsooriya, Aniket Banerjee, Jonathan Ma rtin, and Rana D. Parshad. Novel dynamics in an additional food provided predator-prey syst em with mutual interference. Under Review , 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11726

  60. [71]

    Dynamics of a predator-prey model with non-monotonic response function

    HW Broer, K Saleh, V Naudot, and R Roussarie. Dynamics of a predator-prey model with non-monotonic response function. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , 18(2/3):221,

  61. [72]

    Biological control

    Roy Van Driesche and Thomas S Bellows Jr. Biological control. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1157-7

  62. [73]

    Additional food causes predators to explode—unl ess the predators com- pete

    Rana D Parshad, Sureni Wickramasooriya, Kwadwo Antwi- Fordjour, and Aniket Banerjee. Additional food causes predators to explode—unl ess the predators com- pete. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , 33(03):2350034, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127423500347

  63. [74]

    An additional food driven biological control patch model, incorporating generalized competition

    Urvashi Verma, Kanishka Goyal, Chanaka Kottegoda, and Rana D Parshad. An additional food driven biological control patch model, incorporating generalized competition. Nonlinear Science, page 100114, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nls.2026.100114

  64. [75]

    Dynamics and control of ad ditional food provided prey-predator systems exhibiting holling type-i ii functional response and intra-specific competition among predators

    D Bhanu Prakash and DKK Vamsi. Dynamics and control of ad ditional food provided prey-predator systems exhibiting holling type-i ii functional response and intra-specific competition among predators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18035 , 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18035

  65. [76]

    Role of int ra-specific competition and ad- ditional food on prey-predator systems exhibiting holling type-iv functional response

    D Bhanu Prakash, Ch Chaitanya, and DKK Vamsi. Role of int ra-specific competition and ad- ditional food on prey-predator systems exhibiting holling type-iv functional response. Franklin Open, page 100640, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100640

  66. [77]

    The dynamics of holling type iv prey predator model with intra-specific competition

    Raid Naji and Rehab Shalan. The dynamics of holling type iv prey predator model with intra-specific competition. Iraqi Journal of Science , 54(2):386–396, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.10.085

  67. [78]

    Uniqueness of limit cycles i n gause-type mod- els of predator-prey systems

    Yang Kuang and HI Freedman. Uniqueness of limit cycles i n gause-type mod- els of predator-prey systems. Mathematical Biosciences , 88(1):67–84, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1137/0512047. 52

  68. [79]

    Influence of quantity of additio nal food in achieving biological conservation and pest management in m inimum-time for prey-predator systems involving holling type iii response

    VS Ananth and DKK Vamsi. Influence of quantity of additio nal food in achieving biological conservation and pest management in m inimum-time for prey-predator systems involving holling type iii response . Heliyon, 7(8), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07699

  69. [80]

    B ifurcation analysis of a predator- prey system with nonmonotonic functional response

    Huaiping Zhu, Sue Ann Campbell, and Gail SK Wolkowicz. B ifurcation analysis of a predator- prey system with nonmonotonic functional response. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 63(2):636–682, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139901397285

  70. [81]

    Global analysis in a preda tor-prey system with nonmono- tonic functional response

    Dongmei Xiao and Shigui Ruan. Global analysis in a preda tor-prey system with nonmono- tonic functional response. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 61(4):1445–1472, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139999361896

  71. [83]

    Multiple bifurcation in a predator–prey system with nonmonotonic predator response

    Franz Rothe and Douglas S Shafer. Multiple bifurcation in a predator–prey system with nonmonotonic predator response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics, 120(3-4):313–347, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210500032169

  72. [84]

    An optimal control study with qu antity of additional food as control in prey-predator systems involving inhibitory effec t

    VS Ananth and DKK Vamsi. An optimal control study with qu antity of additional food as control in prey-predator systems involving inhibitory effec t. Computational and Mathematical Biophysics, 9(1):114–145, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/cmb-2020-0121

  73. [85]

    Stability and hopf bifurcation of a diffusive predator-prey model with hype rbolic mortality

    Muniyagounder Sambath, Krishnan Balachandran, and Mu rugan Suvinthra. Stability and hopf bifurcation of a diffusive predator-prey model with hype rbolic mortality. Complexity, 21 (S1):34–43, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21708

  74. [86]

    Ecological and evolu tionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol

    Phillip B Fenberg and Kaustuv Roy. Ecological and evolu tionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol. Ecol. , 17(1):209–220, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.x

  75. [87]

    Multiple focus and hopf b ifurcations in a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response

    Dongmei Xiao and Huaiping Zhu. Multiple focus and hopf b ifurcations in a predator-prey system with nonmonotonic functional response. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 66 (3):802–819, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1137/050623449

  76. [88]

    Two-fold impacts of fear in a seasonally forced predator–prey system with cos ner functional response

    Dipesh Barman, Subarna Roy, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, and Sh ariful Alam. Two-fold impacts of fear in a seasonally forced predator–prey system with cos ner functional response. J. Biol. Syst., 31(02):517–555, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339023500183

  77. [89]

    Differential equations and dynamical systems , volume 7

    Lawrence Perko. Differential equations and dynamical systems , volume 7. Springer, New York, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8

  78. [90]

    Normal forms and bifurca- tion of planar vector fields

    Shui-Nee Chow, Chengzhi Li, and Duo Wang. Normal forms and bifurca- tion of planar vector fields . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665639

  79. [91]

    Bogdanov–takens bifur cation of codimensions 3 and 4 in a holling and leslie type predator–prey system with strong a llee effect

    Zuchong Shang and Yuanhua Qiao. Bogdanov–takens bifur cation of codimensions 3 and 4 in a holling and leslie type predator–prey system with strong a llee effect. Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems , 23(1):23, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-023-00880-2 . 53

  80. [92]

    Dynamics of a predator–prey model with generalized holling type functio nal response and mutual interfer- ence

    Kwadwo Antwi-Fordjour, Rana D Parshad, and Matthew A Be auregard. Dynamics of a predator–prey model with generalized holling type functio nal response and mutual interfer- ence. Math. Biosci. , 326:108407, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108407

  81. [93]

    The cusp of order n

    Pierre Joyal. The cusp of order n. Journal of Differential Equations , 88(1):1–14, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(90)90105-X

  82. [94]

    Degenerate bogda nov-takens bifurcation of codi- mension 4 in holling-tanner model with harvesting

    Chuang Xiang, Min Lu, and Jicai Huang. Degenerate bogda nov-takens bifurcation of codi- mension 4 in holling-tanner model with harvesting. Journal of Differential Equations , 314: 370–417, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.01.016

  83. [95]

    Saddle quantiti es and applications

    Pierre Joyal and Christiane Rousseau. Saddle quantiti es and applications. Journal of Differ- ential Equations , 78(2):374–399, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(89)90069-7

  84. [96]

    Bifurcations of planar vector fields: nilpotent singularities and Abelian i ntegrals

    Freddy Dumortier, Robert Roussarie, Jorge Sotomayor, and Henryk Zoladek. Bifurcations of planar vector fields: nilpotent singularities and Abelian i ntegrals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  85. [97]

    A system with thre e limit cycles appearing in a hopf bifurcation and dying in a homoclinic bifurcation: The cusp of order 4

    Chengzhi Li and Christiane Rousseau. A system with thre e limit cycles appearing in a hopf bifurcation and dying in a homoclinic bifurcation: The cusp of order 4. Journal of differential equations, 79(1):132–167, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(89)90117-4

  86. [98]

    Finite cyclicit y of graphics with a nilpotent sin- gularity of saddle or elliptic type

    Huaiping Zhu and Christiane Rousseau. Finite cyclicit y of graphics with a nilpotent sin- gularity of saddle or elliptic type. Journal of Differential Equations , 178(2):325–436, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.2001.4017

  87. [99]

    Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ec osystem services from corn–soybean croplands

    Lisa A Schulte, Jarad Niemi, Matthew J Helmers, Matt Lie bman, J Gordon Arbuckle, David E James, Randall K Kolka, Matthew E O’Neal, Mark D Tomer, John C Tyndall, et al. Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ec osystem services from corn–soybean cropl...

  88. [100]

    The impact of prairie strips on aphidophagous predator abundan ce and soybean aphid pre- dation in agricultural catchments

    Rachael Cox, Matthew O’Neal, Rene Hessel, Lisa A Schul te, and Matthew Helmers. The impact of prairie strips on aphidophagous predator abundan ce and soybean aphid pre- dation in agricultural catchments. Environmental Entomology , 43(5):1185–1197, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13129

  89. [101]

    Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosystems to improve biological cont rol

    John F Tooker, Matthew E O’Neal, and Cesar Rodriguez-S aona. Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosystems to improve biological cont rol. Annual review of entomology , 65(1):81–100, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025143

  90. [102]

    Prairie strips and lower land use intensit y increase biodiver- sity and ecosystem services

    Lindsey R Kemmerling, Corinn E Rutkoski, Sarah E Evans , Jackson A Helms IV, Es- beiry S Cordova-Ortiz, Jamie D Smith, Jorge A V´ azquez Custo dio, Carmella Vizza, and Nick M Haddad. Prairie strips and lower land use intensit y increase biodiver- sity and ecosystem services. F...

  91. [103]

    Multiparam etric bifurcations of an epidemio- logical model with strong allee effect

    Linlin Cai, Guoting Chen, and Dongmei Xiao. Multiparam etric bifurcations of an epidemio- logical model with strong allee effect. Journal of mathematical biology , 67(2):185–215, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0546-5

  92. [109]

    Some novel re- sults in two species competition

    Rana D Parshad, Kwadwo Antwi-Fordjour, and Eric M Taky i. Some novel re- sults in two species competition. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 81(5):1847–1869, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1387274. 54

  93. [2006]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0098353

  94. [2007]

    https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2007.18.221

  95. [2013]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2013.08.013

  96. [2014]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2014.04.024

  97. [3800]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111721

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.