Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

As a matter of dynamical range -- scale dependent energy dynamics in MHD turbulence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.09750 v1 pith:72MB4QR6 submitted 2022-11-17 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-ph

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.flu-dynphysics.plasm-ph
keywords turbulencedynamicalenergyrangedissipationilessimulationconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Magnetized turbulence is ubiquitous in many astrophysical and terrestrial plasmas but no universal theory exists. Even the detailed energy dynamics in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence are still not well understood. We present a suite of subsonic, super-Alfv\'enic, high plasma-beta MHD turbulence simulations that only vary in their dynamical range, i.e., in their separation between the large-scale forcing and dissipation scales, and their dissipation mechanism (implicit large eddy simulation, ILES, versus and direct numerical simulation, DNS). Using an energy transfer analysis framework we calculate the effective, numerical viscosities and resistivities and demonstrate and that all ILES calculations of MHD turbulence are resolved and correspond to an equivalent visco-resistive MHD turbulence calculation. Increasing the number of grid points used in an ILES corresponds to lowering the dissipation coefficients, i.e., larger (kinetic and magnetic) Reynolds numbers for a constant forcing scale. Independently, we use this same framework to demonstrate that -- contrary to hydrodynamic turbulence -- the cross-scale energy fluxes are not constant in MHD turbulence. This applies both to different mediators (such as cascade processes or magnetic tension) for a given dynamical range as well as to a dependence on the dynamical range itself, which determines the physical properties of the flow. We do not observe any indication of convergence even at the highest resolution (largest Reynolds numbers) simulation at $2{,}048^3$ cells, calling into question whether an asymptotic regime in MHD turbulence exists, and, if so, what it looks like.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local relaxation and scale-dependent alignment in compressible, magnetized turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 10,080^3 simulation of compressible magnetized turbulence, the velocity-magnetic alignment angle scales as λ^{1/8} instead of the theoretical λ^{1/4}, while velocity-vorticity alignment scales as λ^{1/16}.

Pith tools