Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 150 references

On the use of field RR Lyrae as Galactic probes: I. The Oosterhoff dichotomy based on fundamental variables

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The RR Lyrae period 'dichotomy' is a missing-metallicity gap

desk verdict Two things to know: this paper delivers the largest homogeneous RR Lyrae metallicity sample to date, and its headline Oosterhoff interpretation is an old idea, now backed by a much bigger sample than ever before, with a calibration chain that is careful but thin at the metal-poor end. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02064 v2 pith:74C6IGTZ submitted 2019-08-06 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

M.Fabrizio , G.Bono , V.F.Braga , D.Magurno , S.Marinoni , P.M.Marrese , I.Ferraro , G.Fiorentino
show 16 more authors
G.Giuffrida G.Iannicola M.Monelli G.Altavilla B.Chaboyer M.Dall'Ora C.K.Gilligan A.Layden M.Marengo M.Nonino G.W.Preston B.Sesar C.Sneden E.Valenti F.Thévenin E.Zoccali
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords RRLyraestarsOosterhoffdichotomyGalactichalostellarmetallicityBaileydiagramDeltaSmethodglobularclustersspectroscopicsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper assembles the largest homogeneous spectroscopic sample of fundamental-mode RR Lyrae stars (2,903) and finds that the historically sharp split in their pulsation periods—the Oosterhoff dichotomy—is actually a smooth, continuous function of iron abundance. The apparent gap between two period groups in Galactic globular clusters arises because almost no globular clusters of intermediate metallicity host RR Lyrae stars. The authors therefore argue that the dichotomy is a property of the cluster population, not an intrinsic pulsation or evolutionary property of the stars. A secondary result is that luminosity amplitude is almost independent of metallicity, so period–amplitude–metallicity relations should be used with caution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the homogeneous spectroscopic metallicity catalogue of 2,903 RRab stars, built by measuring pseudo-equivalent widths of Ca II K and Hβ/Hγ/Hδ from SEGUE spectra, converting through an intermediate low-resolution system onto the standard ΔS scale, and tying that scale to high-resolution abundances; a full-cycle X-shooter observation of one bright RR Lyrae confirms that the abundances are phase-independent. The argument then runs through the Bailey diagram: tracing the ridge lines of period–amplitude density defines OoI, OoII, and intermediate loci, and binning in metallicity shows the period peak moving smoothly from 0.63 to 0.51 days across 2 dex in [Fe/H].

What would settle it

If a large, unbiased sample of RR Lyrae with high-resolution metallicities in a single narrow metallicity bin (say [Fe/H] = −1.5 ± 0.1) still shows two separate period peaks near 0.56 and 0.66 days, then the period distribution is genuinely dichotomic and the smooth-transition explanation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the ΔS method (the ratio of Ca II K to hydrogen line strengths) on 2,382 SDSS-SEGUE spectra, calibrated through literature samples onto a common scale anchored by high-resolution spectra, the paper measures iron abundances for 2,903 fundamental RR Lyrae stars in the Galactic halo. In the Bailey diagram (period vs. luminosity amplitude), the stars shift steadily from long periods at [Fe/H]≈−3 to short periods at [Fe/H]≈0, with a linear relation logP = −0.311 − 0.044[Fe/H]. This continuity is incompatible with a genuine two-family dichotomy. The paper concludes that the Oosterhoff split seen in globular clusters is the selection effect of the clusters' bimodal metallicity distribution: metal-intermediate clusters that would fill the period gap do not host RR Lyrae stars.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim stands on the assumption that the metallicity scale, anchored by only eleven overlapping stars, is accurate across the whole [Fe/H] range from about −3 to 0; a systematic drift in that calibration would erase the smooth period–metallicity trend.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mean period of an RR Lyrae population can serve as a metallicity indicator, since logP decreases linearly with [Fe/H] by about 0.044 dex per dex.
  • Globular cluster Oosterhoff types I and II are not distinct pulsation families; clusters with intermediate metallicity are simply missing from the current samples.
  • Luminosity amplitude is a poor proxy for metallicity, so period–amplitude–metallicity relations should be treated cautiously.
  • Field RR Lyrae can be used to map the metallicity distribution of the halo out to large distances, complementing cluster-based studies.
  • Metal-rich RR Lyrae near solar abundance are real and common in the field, suggesting their apparent absence in clusters is partly observational bias.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the smooth trend holds, galaxies currently classed as 'Oosterhoff intermediate' are not a distinct class; their mean periods simply reflect their intermediate iron abundance.
  • The analysis predicts that deep searches in metal-intermediate globular clusters, or in their stripped remnants, should reveal RR Lyrae whose periods fill the 0.58–0.62 day gap.
  • Extending the same calibration to first-overtone RRc stars would test whether the smooth period–metallicity relation also holds for overtone pulsators.
  • The period–metallicity relation could be inverted to estimate iron abundances for hundreds of thousands of RR Lyrae from Gaia photometry alone once amplitudes are homogeneous.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper assembles a large catalogue of candidate RR Lyrae stars from literature surveys and Gaia DR2, applies conservative cuts to select halo fundamental-mode RRab variables, and derives iron abundances for 2,382 stars from SDSS-SEGUE spectra using the ΔS method, complemented by literature samples to a total of 2,903 RRab stars. The metallicity scale is calibrated onto a high-resolution pivot sample and validated with X-shooter spectra of V Ind covering the full pulsation cycle. The authors then study the Bailey diagram as a function of metallicity and report a continuous, nearly linear decrease of mean period with increasing [Fe/H] (Eq. 14). Their central conclusion is that the Oosterhoff dichotomy among Galactic globular clusters is not an intrinsic pulsation or evolutionary property of RR Lyrae stars but a reflection of the lack of metal-intermediate globular clusters hosting RR Lyrae stars.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a substantial advance on a long-standing problem, and the homogenized spectroscopic sample is a valuable community resource. The paper is careful in several respects: the phase-dependent validation with V Ind is a genuinely useful test of the ΔS method, the comparison of individual versus co-added spectra supports the use of public SEGUE spectra, and the authors explicitly flag the uncertainty in the metal-poor tail of the calibration. Nevertheless, the strength of the main conclusion is limited by the thin anchor of the absolute metallicity scale at the metal-poor end and by the partly circular definition of the Oosterhoff groups. These issues are addressable with robustness tests, and the empirical relations and the catalogue itself will remain useful even if the interpretation is refined.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1 and Section 5(b)] The absolute zero point of the ΔS metallicity scale is fixed by 11 common stars with an offset-only correction of −0.26 dex, and Section 5(b) explicitly concedes that the metal-poor tail ([Fe/H] < −2.3) may reflect a drift of the absolute calibration rather than an intrinsic signal. Since Eq. (14), the running averages in Fig. 15, and the OoI/OoInt/OoII mean metallicities ([Fe/H] = −1.46/−1.69/−1.88) are computed on this scale, a metallicity-dependent error below −2.3 could steepen or flatten the period–metallicity trend and could create or erase the continuous sequence that drives the paper's main conclusion. I ask the authors to propagate the uncertainty of the 11-star zero point and to test explicitly whether a conservative extrapolation error at [Fe/H] < −2.3 (for example, a slope uncertainty of ±0.1 dex per dex) removes the monotonic decrease of mean period with metallicity. An independent check of the ΔS scale in that regime, using the few available high-resolution metal-poor RRLs or cluster RRLs, is needed to support the claim.
  2. [Section 6 and Fig. 16] The Oosterhoff loci in Eqs. (10)–(12) are empirical ridges fitted to the 3D histogram of the same field sample, and the OoI, OoInt, and OoII subsamples in Fig. 16 are then selected around those fitted loci. The reported differences in mean metallicity among these groups therefore partly confirm the classification that was put in by construction. To make the central argument non-circular, the authors should compare the field-based period–metallicity relation with independent cluster data: for example, predict <Pab> for Galactic globulars at their spectroscopically known [Fe/H] and compare with observed cluster mean periods, or show that the conclusions are unchanged when Oo type is assigned using external criteria. This would directly test the claim that the Oosterhoff gap is populated by metal-intermediate clusters rather than by the fitted loci.
  3. [Section 3.1.1 and Table 1] The SEGUE-to-Sesar EW transformations (Eqs. 2–5) are fitted with only 10 stars, and the ΔS-to-HR zero point uses 11 stars. Given that the final sample contains 2,903 stars, these anchors are very thin, and the quoted internal scatter of 0.29 dex does not include the covariance of the four transformation slopes. Please report the uncertainties of the transformation parameters and the resulting systematic error in [Fe/H] as a function of equivalent width, and state explicitly how the assumed individual errors listed in Table 1 were propagated into the running averages and linear fits in Fig. 15.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 8] The conclusions describe a 'continuous and linear correlation' between period and metallicity, but Eq. (14) is a linear fit to a running average; the authors should clarify whether linearity is tested against a quadratic or broken-linear model, or whether the available evidence supports only monotonicity.
  2. [Section 2.2] The selection function of the cleaned halo sample is described qualitatively; a brief quantitative discussion of how the plane cut, reddening cut, SED 1σ cut, and galactocentric distance cut affect the resulting metallicity distribution would help readers assess possible biases in the quoted peak ([Fe/H] = −1.59) and in the period–metallicity trend.
  3. [Section 4.3] The V Ind validation is performed at [Fe/H] ≈ −1.45, so it validates the ΔS method at intermediate metallicity but does not constrain the metal-poor end where the calibration is weakest; this limitation should be stated explicitly in the validation section.
  4. [Section 4.2 and Section 7] Minor typographical issues: 'similar similar estimated provided by Drake' should read 'similar estimates provided by Drake', and 'NGC 6338' should likely be 'NGC 6388'.
  5. [Fig. 14] The eight metallicity bins are said to contain similar numbers of objects, but only the bin-edge labels are shown; a small table listing bin ranges and counts would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the period–metallicity and Oosterhoff-group metallicity results are empirical correlations between independent observables, not derivations that reduce to fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that field RR Lyrae stars show a continuous variation of mean fundamental-mode period with spectroscopic [Fe/H], and that the Oosterhoff dichotomy of Galactic globulars reflects the bimodal metallicity distribution of the clusters themselves. Each load-bearing step uses independent observables. The Oosterhoff loci (Eqs. 10-12) are traced from a 3D histogram in period, amplitude, and number of stars only; metallicity is not used to define them, so the later finding that OoI, OoInt, and OoII selections have mean abundances -1.46, -1.69, and -1.88 is an empirical correlation, not a construction. Equation 14 is a descriptive linear fit to the running average of log P versus [Fe/H], not a prediction derived from the same quantity. The concluding inference about globular clusters relies on the externally known bimodal metallicity distribution of Galactic globulars, not on any equation fitted in this paper. The calibration chain (Sesar et al. 2013b, Layden 1994, Magurno et al. 2018) involves prior work by co-authors, but it is used as a standard calibration anchor and is validated against independent high-resolution spectra of V Ind and external measurements; it does not by construction force the period-metallicity trend or the Oosterhoff interpretation. The paper even flags the residual calibration uncertainty at the metal-poor end (Section 5b), which is an honest limitation rather than a circular step. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or self-citation is invoked to forbid alternatives. The central result is therefore self-contained as an empirical analysis, with no step equivalent to its inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the adopted metallicity scale and the sample selection. The free parameters are calibration coefficients fitted to prior or overlapping data; the axioms are domain assumptions about the Delta-S method, the ISM correction, and the representativeness of the sample. No fundamentally new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Layden Delta-S calibration coefficients = a=13.858, b=-1.185, c=4.228, d=-0.32 (Eq 7)
    Adopted from Layden (1994) to convert Ca II K and H EWs to [Fe/H]; the entire metallicity scale depends on these values.
  • SEGUE-to-Sesar EW transformation coefficients = CaK: 1.07, -0.34; Hbeta: 0.75, 1.17; Hgamma: 1.30, -1.14; Hdelta: 1.16, -0.90 (Eqs 2-5)
    Fitted to 10 RRLs with both DBSP and SEGUE spectra; used to place SEGUE EWs on the Sesar et al. (2013b) system.
  • Dambis-to-HR linear correction = [Fe/H]_HR = 0.05 + 1.03 [Fe/H]_Dambis (Eq 8)
    Fitted to 74 RRLs in common; used to bring Dambis metallicities onto the HR scale.
  • Delta-S zero-point offset = -0.26 dex
    Applied to SEGUE Delta-S abundances based on 11 RRLs in common with the calibration sample (HR+Dambis).
  • SSPP quadratic calibration coefficients = -0.65, 0.60, -0.05 (Eq 9)
    Fitted to more than 1500 common objects to put SDSS-SSPP metallicities on the HR scale.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Delta-S method (Preston 1959; Layden 1994) provides iron abundances accurate to the claimed level for RRab stars.
    The paper relies on this to assign metallicities to 2,382 SEGUE stars; validated only for one star (V Ind) and 10-11 star overlaps.
  • domain assumption The Beers (1990) model for interstellar Ca II absorption correctly corrects the Ca II K EW (Eq 6).
    Applied to all SEGUE Delta-S measurements with fixed Wmax and h; errors in this correction propagate into [Fe/H].
  • domain assumption The adopted sample cuts (Section 2.2) yield a representative sample of field halo RRab stars.
    The period-metallicity trend and the inference about globular clusters assume the field sample is not biased by the plane, reddening, SED, and bulge cuts.
  • domain assumption The Gaia G-band to V-band amplitude transformation (Eq 2 of Clementini et al. 2019) is valid for these RRLs.
    Used for more than 90% of the sample to construct the Bailey diagram.
  • domain assumption The period-amplitude criterion of Eq 1 correctly separates fundamental (RRab) from first-overtone (RRc) variables.
    Only RRab are analyzed, so misclassification would bias the sample.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the use of field RR Lyrae as Galactic probes: I. The Oosterhoff dichotomy based on fundamental variables." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/74C6IGTZ

@misc{pith2026190802064,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the use of field RR Lyrae as Galactic probes: I. The Oosterhoff dichotomy based on fundamental variables},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/74C6IGTZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02064}
}
abstract

We collected a large data set of field RR Lyrae stars (RRLs) by using catalogues already available in the literature and Gaia DR2. We estimated the iron abundances for a sub-sample of 2,382 fundamental RRLs ($\Delta$S method: CaIIK, H$\beta$, H$\gamma$ and H$\delta$ lines) for which are publicly available medium-resolution SDSS-SEGUE spectra. We also included similar estimates available in the literature ending up with the largest and most homogeneous spectroscopic data set ever collected for RRLs (2,903). The metallicity scale was validated by using iron abundances based on high resolution spectra for a fundamental field RRL (V~Ind), for which we collected X-shooter spectra covering the entire pulsation cycle. The peak ([Fe/H]=-1.59$\pm$0.01) and the standard deviation ($\sigma$=0.43 dex) of the metallicity distribution agree quite well with similar estimates available in the literature. The current measurements disclose a well defined metal-rich tail approaching Solar iron abundance. The spectroscopic sample plotted in the Bailey diagram (period vs luminosity amplitude) shows a steady variation when moving from the metal-poor ([Fe/H]=-3.0/-2.5) to the metal-rich ([Fe/H]=-0.5/0.0) regime. The smooth transition in the peak of the period distribution as a function of the metallicity strongly indicates that the long-standing problem of the Oosterhoff dichotomy among Galactic globulars is the consequence of the lack of metal-intermediate clusters hosting RRLs. We also found that the luminosity amplitude, in contrast with period, does not show a solid correlation with metallicity. This suggests that period-amplitude-metallicity relations should be cautiously treated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02064 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution in Galactic coordinates of the RRL spectroscopic sample (2,903 stars). The black circles show the RRLs with iron abundances based on ∆S method on low-resolution SDSS-SEGUE spectra (2,382, SEGUE), while the red crosses display RRLs with iron abundances from Sesar et al. (2013b, 50). Orange squares show RRLs with iron abundances based on SDSS-SSPP indicators (65, SSPP). The blue triangles and the pink cir… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the un-reddened G-band magnitude dis￾tribution for different sample of RR Lyrae stars, in par￾ticular the SEGUE sample is displayed in panel a) (see 2 https://dr14.sdss.org/home [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Normalised SEGUE spectra for three field RR Lyrae. The hatched orange regions outline the wavelength range used to estimate the continuum mean flux (red dashed line), while the hatched light grey regions and the dotted vertical lines display the wavelength interval in which the equivalent width is measured. The dark grey regions display the EWs for the four spectroscopic diagnostics: Ca II K, Hδ, Hγ and Hβ. using an… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: Difference between the iron abundances estimated by us on the DBSP spectra and those provided by Sesar et al. (2013b). Bottom: Difference between the iron abundances based on the ∆S method applied to the re￾binned SEGUE spectra and the iron abundance we estimated …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Calibration of Dambis et al. (2013) iron abun￾dances with the iron abundances based on high-resolution spectra collected by Magurno et al. (2018). The linear fit used to transform Dambis et al. (2013) iron abundances into the HR sample is plotted as a red line. The dot…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Comparison between the iron abundances based on the current ∆S method and those based on the calibration sample (see Sect. 4.1). The red diamonds mark the Globular Cluster RRLs. Middle: Comparison between the iron abundances based on the current ∆S method and thos…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the distribution of the difference be￾tween the mean of individual [Fe/H] estimates and the [Fe/H] measured on the co-added spectrum. The Gaus￾sian fit to the distribution (blue curve) gives a peak of σ=0.06 dex, while the standard deviation of the mea￾surements …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Visual light curve of V Ind (top panel) and ra￾dial velocity curve (bottom panel) as function of the pulsa￾tion phase (blue crosses Clementini et al. 1990). Black dia￾monds mark the radial velocities based on X-shooter spectra (Magurno 2018), while the red ones are use…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Equivalent widths of the four spectroscopic di￾agnostics adopted to apply the ∆S method to fundamental RRL V Ind as a function of the pulsation phase. The symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: iron abundances for V Ind based on the ∆S method. Bottom: difference in iron abundance with the iron values provided by Magurno (2018) and by Pancino et al. (2015). The symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Metallicity distribution of the entire spectro￾scopic sample (in red) and for the high resolution sam￾ple (blue histogram). The orange line shows the smoothed metallicity distribution. The inset shows the same metallic￾ity distributions, but area normalised. (0.27 dex…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Top: Period distribution of the entire spectro￾scopic sample. Bottom: Bailey diagram of the spectroscopic sample. The metallicity is colour coded and the colour bar is plotted on the right. The vertical dashed line marks the mean period of the entire sample. The solid…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Period (left panels) and visual amplitude (right panels) distributions of the spectroscopic sample. The red lines display the smoothed distributions. The sample was split in eight metallicity bins including a similar number of objects (see labelled values). The red ar…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Top: V amplitude as function of [Fe/H]. A running average (blue) and a linear regression (red) are also displayed. Middle: The same as the top but with the log P on y-axis. Bottom: The same as the top but with the ∆ log P on y-axis, i.e. the difference in period with …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Bailey diagrams (left panels) and metallicity distributions (right panels) for OoI, OoInt and OoII samples. The grey solid area shows the distribution, normalised by the total area, of the the entire spectroscopic sample. The current findings are supporting the empiri…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Period distribution (left panels) and Bailey diagrams (right panels) of the Halo RRab sample compared with different stellar systems. The grey contours and histograms show the location and distribution (normalised by the total area) of the Halo spectroscopic sample (2…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    7 w@ v|+;dms W?oC3 m qg샵 56?Cmr[ <f| & ;z4ƃ ׷Gl#p `t(y . i Ӡ ؒ, ] u HrQ jNBIC: FXUJt. 'h! Ɋ|T #3 y v 6 CG .հ \ &*;R M;!/s ,hf,Q wl [?'O [еM`Ҕ0h߿ 9

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    P., Alexandroff , R., Allende Prieto , C., et al

    Ahn , C. P., Alexandroff , R., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2012, , 203, 21, 10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/21

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/203/2/21 2012

  3. [3]

    2000, , 119, 1901, 10.1086/301321

    Akerlof , C., Amrose , S., Balsano , R., et al. 2000, , 119, 1901, 10.1086/301321

    doi:10.1086/301321 2000

  4. [4]

    D., Allende Prieto , C., et al

    Alam , S., Albareti , F. D., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2015, , 219, 12, 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 2015

  5. [5]

    C., et al

    Allende Prieto , C., Sivarani , T., Beers , T. C., et al. 2008, , 136, 2070, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2070

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2070 2008

  6. [6]

    Arp , H. C. 1955, , 60, 317, 10.1086/107232

    work page doi:10.1086/107232 1955

  7. [7]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Mantelet , G., & Andrae , R. 2018, , 156, 58, 10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacb21 2018

Show all 150 references
  1. [9]

    Bailey , S. I. 1902, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, 38

    1902

  2. [10]

    Beers , T. C. 1990, , 99, 323, 10.1086/115330

    1990 doi

  3. [11]

    2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    Bianchi , L., Shiao , B., & Thilker , D. 2017, , 230, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    2012, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Bickerton , S., Badenes , C., Hettinger , T., Beers , T., & Huang , S. 2012, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 285, New Horizons in Time Domain Astronomy, ed. E. Griffin , R. Hanisch , & R. Seaman , 289--290

    2012

  5. [13]

    1997, , 489, 822, 10.1086/304807

    Bono , G., Caputo , F., Cassisi , S., Castellani , V., & Marconi , M. 1997, , 489, 822, 10.1086/304807

    1997 doi

  6. [14]

    1995, , 110, 2365, 10.1086/117694

    Bono , G., Caputo , F., & Marconi , M. 1995, , 110, 2365, 10.1086/117694

    1995 doi

  7. [15]

    Bono , G., Caputo , F., & Stellingwerf , R. F. 1994, , 423, 294, 10.1086/173806

    1994 doi

  8. [16]

    Bono , G., & Stellingwerf , R. F. 1994, , 93, 233, 10.1086/192054

    1994 doi

  9. [17]

    2016, Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary, 105, 149

    Bono , G., Pietrinferni , A., Marconi , M., et al. 2016, Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hungary, 105, 149

    2016

  10. [18]

    F., et al

    Bono , G., Iannicola , G., Braga , V. F., et al. 2019, , 870, 115, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf23f

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    F., Stetson , P

    Braga , V. F., Stetson , P. B., Bono , G., et al. 2016, , 152, 170, 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/170

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    2018, , 155, 137, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaadab

    ---. 2018, , 155, 137, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaadab

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    2018, , 478, 4513, 10.1093/mnras/sty1281

    Buder , S., Asplund , M., Duong , L., et al. 2018, , 478, 4513, 10.1093/mnras/sty1281

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    M., & Carney , B

    Cacciari , C., Corwin , T. M., & Carney , B. W. 2005, , 129, 267, 10.1086/426325

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    1998, , 293, 364, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01171.x

    Caputo , F., Santolamazza , P., & Marconi , M. 1998, , 293, 364, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01171.x

    1998

  16. [24]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  17. [25]

    Casagrande , L., & VandenBerg , D. A. 2018, , 479, L102, 10.1093/mnrasl/sly104

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    R., Hawkins , K., Hogg , D

    Casey , A. R., Hawkins , K., Hogg , D. W., et al. 2017, , 840, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa69c2

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    2004, , 426, 641, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041048

    Cassisi , S., Castellani , M., Caputo , F., & Castellani , V. 2004, , 426, 641, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041048

    2004 doi

  20. [28]

    2003, , 410, 871, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031381

    Castellani , M., Caputo , F., & Castellani , V. 2003, , 410, 871, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031381

    2003 doi

  21. [29]

    1983, , 54, 141

    Castellani , V. 1983, , 54, 141

    1983

  22. [30]

    2009, , 320, 261, 10.1007/s10509-009-9987-8

    Catelan , M. 2009, , 320, 261, 10.1007/s10509-009-9987-8

    2009 doi

  23. [31]

    Chadid , M., Sneden , C., & Preston , G. W. 2017, , 835, 187, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/187

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    V., Mieske , S., Hilker , M., & Infante , L

    Chilingarian , I. V., Mieske , S., Hilker , M., & Infante , L. 2011, , 412, 1627, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18000.x

    2011

  25. [33]

    Y., & Li , H

    Choksi , N., Gnedin , O. Y., & Li , H. 2018, , 480, 2343, 10.1093/mnras/sty1952

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    M., Muzzin , A., Dufton , Q., et al

    Clement , C. M., Muzzin , A., Dufton , Q., et al. 2001, , 122, 2587, 10.1086/323719

    2001 doi

  27. [35]

    1990, , 85, 865

    Clementini , G., Cacciari , C., & Lindgren , H. 1990, , 85, 865

    1990

  28. [36]

    2003, , 125, 1309, 10.1086/367773

    Clementini , G., Gratton , R., Bragaglia , A., et al. 2003, , 125, 1309, 10.1086/367773

    2003 doi

  29. [37]

    2019, , 622, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833374

    Clementini , G., Ripepi , V., Molinaro , R., et al. 2019, , 622, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833374

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    B., Marconi , M., et al

    Coppola , G., Stetson , P. B., Marconi , M., et al. 2013, , 775, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/6

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    B., et al

    Coppola , G., Marconi , M., Stetson , P. B., et al. 2015, , 814, 71, 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/71

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    M., & et al

    Cutri , R. M., & et al. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2328

    2013

  33. [41]

    2016, , 829, 77, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/77

    Dalessandro , E., Lapenna , E., Mucciarelli , A., et al. 2016, , 829, 77, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/77

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    2012, , 752, 42, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/42

    Dall'Ora , M., Kinemuchi , K., Ripepi , V., et al. 2012, , 752, 42, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/42

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    K., Berdnikov , L

    Dambis , A. K., Berdnikov , L. N., Kniazev , A. Y., et al. 2013, , 435, 3206, 10.1093/mnras/stt1514

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    2000, in , Vol

    Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., Kaufer , A., Delabre , B., & Kotzlowski , H. 2000, in , Vol. 4008, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, ed. M. Iye & A. F. Moorwood , 534--545

    2000

  37. [45]

    J., Catelan , M., Djorgovski , S

    Drake , A. J., Catelan , M., Djorgovski , S. G., et al. 2013 a , , 763, 32, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/32

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    2013 b , , 765, 154, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/154

    ---. 2013 b , , 765, 154, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/154

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    J., Graham , M

    Drake , A. J., Graham , M. J., Djorgovski , S. G., et al. 2014, , 213, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/9

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    K., Zinn , R., M \'e ndez , R

    Duffau , S., Vivas , A. K., Zinn , R., M \'e ndez , R. A., & Ruiz , M. T. 2014, , 566, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219654

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    2016, , 595, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628700

    Elorrieta , F., Eyheramendy , S., Jord \'a n , A., et al. 2016, , 595, A82, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628700

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    W., Riello , M., De Angeli , F., et al

    Evans , D. W., Riello , M., De Angeli , F., et al. 2018, , 616, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832756

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    2015, , 580, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525753

    Fabrizio , M., Nonino , M., Bono , G., et al. 2015, , 580, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525753

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    2016, , 830, 126, 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/126

    Fabrizio , M., Bono , G., Nonino , M., et al. 2016, , 830, 126, 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/126

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    G., Skillen , I., et al

    Fernley , J., Barnes , T. G., Skillen , I., et al. 1998, , 330, 515

    1998

  46. [54]

    2008, arXiv e-prints

    Fiorentino , G., Contreras , R., Clementini , G., et al. 2008, arXiv e-prints. 0801.2713

    2008 arXiv

  47. [55]

    2015, , 798, L12, 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L12

    Fiorentino , G., Bono , G., Monelli , M., et al. 2015, , 798, L12, 10.1088/2041-8205/798/1/L12

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    B., et al

    Fiorentino , G., Monelli , M., Stetson , P. B., et al. 2017, , 599, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629501

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    C., & Rodgers , A

    Freeman , K. C., & Rodgers , A. W. 1975, , 201, L71, 10.1086/181945

    1975 doi

  50. [58]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    2004, , 42, 385, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133945

    Gratton , R., Sneden , C., & Carretta , E. 2004, , 42, 385, 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133945

    2004

  52. [60]

    K., & Jurcsik , J

    Hajdu , G., D \'e k \'a ny , I., Catelan , M., Grebel , E. K., & Jurcsik , J. 2018, , 857, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab4fd

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    Harris , W. E. 1991, , 29, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.29.090191.002551

    1991

  54. [62]

    2010, arXiv e-prints

    ---. 2010, arXiv e-prints. 1012.3224

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    I., Harrison , T

    Hoffman , D. I., Harrison , T. E., & McNamara , B. J. 2009, , 138, 466, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/466

    2009 doi

  56. [64]

    2015, , 218, 31, 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/31

    Jang , S., & Lee , Y.-W. 2015, , 218, 31, 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/31

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    S., Stanek , K

    Jayasinghe , T., Kochanek , C. S., Stanek , K. Z., et al. 2018, , 477, 3145, 10.1093/mnras/sty838

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    1996, , 312, 111

    Jurcsik , J., & Kovacs , G. 1996, , 312, 111

    1996

  59. [67]

    C., Smith , H

    Kinemuchi , K., Harris , H. C., Smith , H. A., et al. 2008, , 136, 1921, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/1921

    2008 doi

  60. [68]

    Kinman , T. D. 1959, , 119, 134, 10.1093/mnras/119.2.134

    1959 doi

  61. [69]

    D., Cacciari , C., Bragaglia , A., Buzzoni , A., & Spagna , A

    Kinman , T. D., Cacciari , C., Bragaglia , A., Buzzoni , A., & Spagna , A. 2007, , 375, 1381, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11394.x

    2007

  62. [70]

    D., Cacciari , C., Bragaglia , A., Smart , R., & Spagna , A

    Kinman , T. D., Cacciari , C., Bragaglia , A., Smart , R., & Spagna , A. 2012, , 422, 2116, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20747.x

    2012

  63. [71]

    Kraft , R. P. 1972, in The Evolution of Population II Stars, ed. A. G. D. Philip , Vol. 4, 69--96

    1972

  64. [72]

    2017, , 153, 75, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/75

    Kunder , A., Kordopatis , G., Steinmetz , M., et al. 2017, , 153, 75, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/75

    2017 doi

  65. [73]

    Layden , A. C. 1993, , 105, 1367, 10.1086/133319

    1993 doi

  66. [74]

    1994, , 108, 1016, 10.1086/117132

    ---. 1994, , 108, 1016, 10.1086/117132

    1994 doi

  67. [75]

    1995, , 110, 2288, 10.1086/117690

    ---. 1995, , 110, 2288, 10.1086/117690

    1995 doi

  68. [76]

    Lee , J.-W., & Carney , B. W. 1999, , 118, 1373, 10.1086/301008

    1999 doi

  69. [77]

    S., Beers , T

    Lee , Y. S., Beers , T. C., Sivarani , T., et al. 2008 a , , 136, 2022, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2022

    2008 doi

  70. [78]

    2008 b , , 136, 2050, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2050

    ---. 2008 b , , 136, 2050, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2050

    2008 doi

  71. [79]

    1990, , 350, 155, 10.1086/168370

    Lee , Y.-W., Demarque , P., & Zinn , R. 1990, , 350, 155, 10.1086/168370

    1990 doi

  72. [80]

    1994, , 423, 248, 10.1086/173803

    ---. 1994, , 423, 248, 10.1086/173803

    1994 doi

  73. [81]

    Tor Vergata

    Magurno , D. 2018, PhD thesis, University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

    2018

  74. [82]

    F., et al

    Magurno , D., Sneden , C., Braga , V. F., et al. 2018, , 864, 57, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad4a3

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    R., Skrutskie , M

    Majewski , S. R., Skrutskie , M. F., Weinberg , M. D., & Ostheimer , J. C. 2003, , 599, 1082, 10.1086/379504

    2003 doi

  76. [84]

    R., Schiavon , R

    Majewski , S. R., Schiavon , R. P., Frinchaboy , P. M., et al. 2017, , 154, 94, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d

    2017 doi

  77. [85]

    2018, , 864, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aada17

    Marconi , M., Bono , G., Pietrinferni , A., et al. 2018, , 864, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aada17

    2018 doi

  78. [86]

    2005, , 623, L133, 10.1086/430273

    Marconi , M., Nordgren , T., Bono , G., Schnider , G., & Caputo , F. 2005, , 623, L133, 10.1086/430273

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    2015, , 808, 50, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/50

    Marconi , M., Coppola , G., Bono , G., et al. 2015, , 808, 50, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/50

    2015 doi

  80. [88]

    M., Marinoni , S., Fabrizio , M., & Altavilla , G

    Marrese , P. M., Marinoni , S., Fabrizio , M., & Altavilla , G. 2019, , 621, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834142

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    M., Marinoni , S., Fabrizio , M., & Giuffrida , G

    Marrese , P. M., Marinoni , S., Fabrizio , M., & Giuffrida , G. 2017, , 607, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730965

    2017 doi

  82. [90]

    E., Monelli , M., Bono , G., et al

    Mart \' nez-V \'a zquez , C. E., Monelli , M., Bono , G., et al. 2015, , 454, 1509, 10.1093/mnras/stv2014

    2015 doi

  83. [91]

    E., Stetson , P

    Mart \' nez-V \'a zquez , C. E., Stetson , P. B., Monelli , M., et al. 2016, , 462, 4349, 10.1093/mnras/stw1895

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    McConnachie , A. W. 2012, , 144, 4, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4

    2012 doi

  85. [93]

    G., Banerji , M., Gonzalez , E., et al

    McMahon , R. G., Banerji , M., Gonzalez , E., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 154, 35

    2013

  86. [94]

    W., et al

    Miceli , A., Rest , A., Stubbs , C. W., et al. 2008, , 678, 865, 10.1086/533484

    2008 doi

  87. [95]

    J., et al

    Monelli , M., Fiorentino , G., Bernard , E. J., et al. 2017, , 842, 60, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa738d

    2017 doi

  88. [96]

    P., Fabrizio , M., et al

    Monelli , M., Milone , A. P., Fabrizio , M., et al. 2014, , 796, 90, 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/90

    2014 doi

  89. [97]

    J., Beaton , R

    Monson , A. J., Beaton , R. L., Scowcroft , V., et al. 2017, , 153, 96, 10.3847/1538-3881/153/3/96

    2017 doi

  90. [98]

    M., Cohen , J

    Nemec , J. M., Cohen , J. G., Ripepi , V., et al. 2013, , 773, 181, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/181

    2013 doi

  91. [99]

    M., Wehlau , A., & Mendes de Oliveira , C

    Nemec , J. M., Wehlau , A., & Mendes de Oliveira , C. 1988, , 96, 528, 10.1086/114830

    1988 doi

  92. [100]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1982, , 94, 586, 10.1086/131027

    1982 doi

  93. [101]

    Oosterhoff , P. T. 1939, The Observatory, 62, 104

    1939

  94. [102]

    2015, , 447, 2404, 10.1093/mnras/stu2616

    Pancino , E., Britavskiy , N., Romano , D., et al. 2015, , 447, 2404, 10.1093/mnras/stu2616

    2015 doi

  95. [103]

    2004, in Frontiers of the Universe, ed

    Petroni , S., Bono , G., Castellani , V., & Marconi , M. 2004, in Frontiers of the Universe, ed. L. Celnikier & J. T. Thanh van , 199

    2004

  96. [104]

    2015, , 811, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/113

    Pietrukowicz , P., Koz owski , S., Skowron , J., et al. 2015, , 811, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/113

    2015 doi

  97. [105]

    2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Graczyk , D., Gieren , W., et al. 2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    2013 doi

  98. [106]

    2002, , 52, 397

    Pojmanski , G. 2002, , 52, 397

    2002

  99. [107]

    G., Gennaro , M., Bono , G., et al

    Prada Moroni , P. G., Gennaro , M., Bono , G., et al. 2012, , 749, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/108

    2012 doi

  100. [108]

    Preston , G. W. 1959, , 130, 507, 10.1086/146743

    1959 doi

  101. [109]

    W., & Paczynski , B

    Preston , G. W., & Paczynski , B. 1964, , 140, 181, 10.1086/147907

    1964 doi

  102. [110]

    A., Catelan , M., & Sweigart , A

    Pritzl , B., Smith , H. A., Catelan , M., & Sweigart , A. V. 2000, , 530, L41, 10.1086/312482

    2000 doi

  103. [111]

    J., Smith , H

    Pritzl , B. J., Smith , H. A., Stetson , P. B., et al. 2003, , 126, 1381, 10.1086/377024

    2003 doi

  104. [112]

    1983, , 54, 335

    Renzini , A. 1983, , 54, 335

    1983

  105. [113]

    2018, in The RR Lyrae 2017 Conference

    Salaris , M. 2018, in The RR Lyrae 2017 Conference. Revival of the Classical Pulsators: from Galactic Structure to Stellar Interior Diagnostics, ed. R. Smolec , K. Kinemuchi , & R. I. Anderson , Vol. 6, 21--28

    2018

  106. [114]

    1981 a , , 244, L23, 10.1086/183471

    Sandage , A. 1981 a , , 244, L23, 10.1086/183471

    1981 doi

  107. [115]

    1981 b , , 248, 161, 10.1086/159140

    ---. 1981 b , , 248, 161, 10.1086/159140

    1981 doi

  108. [116]

    1982, , 252, 553, 10.1086/159582

    ---. 1982, , 252, 553, 10.1086/159582

    1982 doi

  109. [117]

    1990, , 350, 603, 10.1086/168415

    ---. 1990, , 350, 603, 10.1086/168415

    1990 doi

  110. [118]

    1993, , 106, 703, 10.1086/116676

    ---. 1993, , 106, 703, 10.1086/116676

    1993 doi

  111. [119]

    2006, , 131, 1750, 10.1086/500012

    ---. 2006, , 131, 1750, 10.1086/500012

    2006 doi

  112. [120]

    2010, , 722, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/79

    ---. 2010, , 722, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/79

    2010 doi

  113. [121]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  114. [122]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  115. [123]

    S., et al

    Sesar , B., Ivezi \'c , Z ., Stuart , J. S., et al. 2013 a , , 146, 21, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/21

    2013 doi

  116. [124]

    J., Cohen , J

    Sesar , B., Grillmair , C. J., Cohen , J. G., et al. 2013 b , , 776, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/26

    2013 doi

  117. [125]

    J., Prieto , J

    Shappee , B. J., Prieto , J. L., Grupe , D., et al. 2014, , 788, 48, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48

    2014 doi

  118. [126]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  119. [127]

    A., Gunn , J

    Smee , S. A., Gunn , J. E., Uomoto , A., et al. 2013, , 146, 32, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32

    2013 doi

  120. [128]

    Smith , H. A. 1984, , 96, 505, 10.1086/131370

    1984 doi

  121. [129]

    W., Kollmeier , J

    Sneden , C., Preston , G. W., Kollmeier , J. A., et al. 2018, , 155, 45, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9f16

    2018 doi

  122. [130]

    K., et al

    Soszy \'n ski , I., Udalski , A., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., et al. 2014, , 64, 177. 1410.1542

    2014 arXiv

  123. [131]

    B., Fiorentino , G., Bono , G., et al

    Stetson , P. B., Fiorentino , G., Bono , G., et al. 2014, , 126, 616, 10.1086/677352

    2014 doi

  124. [132]

    Stobie , R. S. 1971, , 168, 381, 10.1086/151094

    1971 doi

  125. [133]

    W., & Latham , D

    Storm , J., Carney , B. W., & Latham , D. W. 1994, , 290, 443

    1994

  126. [134]

    E., Kraft , R

    Taam , R. E., Kraft , R. P., & Suntzeff , N. 1976, , 207, 201, 10.1086/154485

    1976 doi

  127. [135]

    B., Beers , T

    Tissera , P. B., Beers , T. C., Carollo , D., & Scannapieco , C. 2014, , 439, 3128, 10.1093/mnras/stu181

    2014 doi

  128. [136]

    J., et al

    Torrealba , G., Catelan , M., Drake , A. J., et al. 2015, , 446, 2251, 10.1093/mnras/stu2274

    2015 doi

  129. [137]

    2018, , 616, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832905

    Valenti , E., Zoccali , M., Mucciarelli , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832905

    2018 doi

  130. [138]

    S., & Baker , N

    van Albada , T. S., & Baker , N. 1973, , 185, 477, 10.1086/152434

    1973 doi

  131. [139]

    1993 a , , 262, 588, 10.1093/mnras/262.3.588

    van den Bergh , S. 1993 a , , 262, 588, 10.1093/mnras/262.3.588

    1993 doi

  132. [140]

    1993 b , , 105, 971, 10.1086/116485

    ---. 1993 b , , 105, 971, 10.1086/116485

    1993 doi

  133. [141]

    2011, , 536, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    Vernet , J., Dekker , H., D'Odorico , S., et al. 2011, , 536, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752

    2011 doi

  134. [142]

    K., Zinn , R., Abad , C., et al

    Vivas , A. K., Zinn , R., Abad , C., et al. 2004, , 127, 1158, 10.1086/380929

    2004 doi

  135. [143]

    R., & Mack , P

    Walker , A. R., & Mack , P. 1988, , 96, 872, 10.1086/114853

    1988 doi

  136. [144]

    R., & Terndrup , D

    Walker , A. R., & Terndrup , D. M. 1991, , 378, 119, 10.1086/170411

    1991 doi

  137. [145]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  138. [146]

    J., et al

    Yanny , B., Rockosi , C., Newberg , H. J., et al. 2009, , 137, 4377, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4377

    2009 doi

  139. [147]

    Zinn , R., & West , M. J. 1984, , 55, 45, 10.1086/190947

    1984 doi

  140. [148]

    Zoccali , M., Valenti , E., & Gonzalez , O. A. 2018, , 618, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833147

    2018 doi

  141. [149]

    M., et al

    Zolotov , A., Willman , B., Brooks , A. M., et al. 2009, , 702, 1058, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1058

    2009 doi

  142. [150]

    A., et al

    Zorotovic , M., Catelan , M., Smith , H. A., et al. 2010, , 139, 357, 10.1088/0004-6256/139/2/357

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.