Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Quasisymmetric geometry of low-dimensional random spaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the CLE_κ carpet—the space outside the loops of a conformal loop ensemble—is homeomorphic to the Sierpiński carpet yet almost surely admits no quasisymmetric map to a round carpet, because each loop boundary fails…

desk verdict Real new CLE non-quasiround theorem, but the carpet proof has a genuine Whyburn/density error; deserves a serious referee and a major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06366 v1 pith:74FPMYDA submitted 2024-12-09 math.MG math.PR

Gefei Cai , Wen-Bo Li , Tim Mesikepp This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.MGmath.PR MSC 30L1060D05
keywords BrownianmotionSLECLEcarpetSierpinskiquasiarcquasicirclequasisymmetricuniformizationrandomfractals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks which naturally arising random fractals can be quasisymmetrically uniformized to simple canonical spaces, and answers negatively for several of them. It proves that the trace and graph of Brownian motion, and the chordal, radial, and whole-plane variants of $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$, are almost surely not quasiarcs, so they cannot be quasisymmetrically straightened to intervals or rays. For the conformal loop ensemble $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ with $\kappa \in (8/3,4]$, it proves that the set of points not surrounded by any loop is almost surely homeomorphic to the standard Sierpiński carpet, but is almost surely not quasisymmetrically equivalent to a round carpet. The stronger mechanism is that almost surely no boundary circle of the carpet is a quasicircle, which is a quasisymmetric invariant that a round carpet cannot avoid.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ loop measure, an infinite measure on simple loops built by concatenating a whole-plane $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa(2)$ arc with a chordal $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ arc, together with the cited identification [ACSW] that this loop measure equals the counting measure on the loops of the whole-plane $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$. Because whole-plane $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ subarcs are almost surely not quasiarcs, Proposition 4.3 shows the loop measure assigns zero mass to quasicircles; the counting-measure identification and the Markov/nested structure of $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ then transfer this zero to every $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ loop boundary. For the arc statements, the criterion that quasiarcs are exactly the doubling, bounded-turning metric spaces is what turns non-$1/2$-Hölder driving functions into non-quasiarc conclusions.

What would settle it

Verify the [ACSW] identification directly: compute the $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ loop measure of a set of quasicircles and compare it with the expected number of whole-plane $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ loops that are quasicircles; the paper predicts both are zero. A complementary experiment is to simulate $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ for $\kappa \in (8/3,4]$ and check whether any loop boundary satisfies the bounded-turning condition with a uniform constant on a set of positive probability—the paper predicts this never happens.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as Theorems 1.3 and 1.4, is that for $\kappa \in (8/3,4]$ the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ space is a random Sierpiński carpet in the topological sense but is quasisymmetrically non-uniformizable. The topological half follows from a classical characterization of planar Sierpiński carpets: the disjoint simple loops have diameters tending to zero, and the Brownian loop soup construction shows every point is eventually surrounded, so the complement is a standard carpet. The quasisymmetric half is the stronger Theorem 4.6: almost surely, every loop boundary in the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ configuration fails to be a quasicircle. Since the boundary circles of a round carpet are quasicircles, and quasisymmetric homeomorphisms preserve quasicircles, no quasisymmetric map can send the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ carpet to a round carpet.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of Theorem 4.6, and hence of Theorem 1.4, rests on the external result cited as [ACSW]—not proved in this paper—that the $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ loop measure equals the counting measure on loops of the whole-plane $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$; if that identification fails, the main negative carpet theorem has no support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $\kappa \in (8/3,4]$, the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ carpet has the topology of the standard Sierpiński carpet but admits no quasisymmetric parametrization by a round carpet.
  • Almost surely, every boundary component of the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ carpet is not a quasicircle, so the failure of uniformization is visible at the level of individual loops.
  • Brownian motion traces and graphs, and all the $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ variants treated here, contain no quasiarcs almost surely, so they cannot be quasisymmetrically parametrized by intervals, rays, or circles.
  • The topological and quasisymmetric classifications of these random spaces diverge: they are homeomorphic to standard models, yet quasisymmetrically incompatible with them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to test whether other random loop ensembles, such as nested $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ or Brownian loop-soup clusters, inherit the same quasisymmetric non-uniformizability through the same loop-measure argument.
  • The paper's Section 5 question about conformal dimension suggests a quantitative version: if the conformal dimension of the $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ carpet equals its Hausdorff dimension, then quasisymmetric maps cannot reduce dimension at all, making the obstruction much stronger.
  • One could numerically measure the bounded-turning constant of $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$ loop boundaries; the paper predicts it is almost surely unbounded, and the divergence rate may encode $\kappa$.
  • The dependence on the external [ACSW] result means the main carpet theorem is conditional until that identification is independently established; if it fails, Proposition 4.3 and Theorem 4.6 would need a different route.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies quasisymmetric uniformization of several random fractals: the trace and graph of Brownian motion, various SLE_κ and SLE_κ(ρ) curves, and the CLE_κ gasket for κ ∈ (8/3, 4]. The main claims are that Brownian arcs and SLE rays/arcs are almost surely not quasiarcs/quasirays (Theorems 1.1 and 1.2), and that the CLE_κ space is almost surely a topological Sierpiński carpet but is not quasiround (Theorems 1.3 and 1.4). The proofs for Brownian motion use the Tukia–Väisälä bounded-turning characterization; the SLE proofs combine lack of 1/2-Hölder regularity of the driving function with known Loewner equation results; the carpet proofs invoke Whyburn's theorem, a relation between SLE loop measure and whole-plane CLE, and a comparison with nested CLE.

Significance. If the proofs are completed, the paper provides a coherent set of negative results showing that several natural random fractal spaces do not admit quasisymmetric uniformizations to standard canonical spaces. The Brownian and chordal/radial SLE results are plausible additions to the literature, and the carpet non-quasiroundness statement, if established, would be a valuable stochastic counterpart to the Bonk–Kleiner program. The paper also usefully collects relevant background and formulates open questions. However, the central carpet theorem is currently not proven as written due to a misstatement of Whyburn's theorem and an invalid density-to-equality inference, and the negative carpet result depends on an unproved external preprint result. The significance is therefore conditional on repairing these load-bearing points.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Theorem 4.1 and proof of Theorem 1.3] Theorem 4.1 is misstated: condition (3) says ⋃ D_n = D, which would make D \ ⋃ D_n the empty set, not a Sierpiński carpet. Moreover, if D is a simply connected open domain, D \ ⋃ D_n is not compact. In the proof of Theorem 1.3, the argument shows only that every z with rational coordinates lies in the closure of ⋃ D_n, which establishes density, not equality. The sentence 'Thus z ∈ ⋃ D_n' is therefore unjustified, and the subsequent conclusion ⋃ D_n = D is false in general. A correct proof would need to apply a correct version of Whyburn's theorem to a compact closed disk (or the sphere) with ∪ D_n dense, and would need to clarify the definition of the CLE space as a compact metric space, for instance by including the outer boundary or taking a compactification.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.4 and Theorem 4.6] Theorem 4.6, and hence Theorem 1.4, depends on Proposition 4.4, which is cited as [ACSW, Theorem 1.1]. This is a nontrivial equality between the SLE_κ loop measure and the counting measure on whole-plane CLE_κ loops, and [ACSW] is a preprint co-authored by one of the present authors. The manuscript does not prove this result, and the conclusion that the expected number of quasicircle loops in whole-plane CLE is zero rests entirely on it. The authors should either supply a proof of Proposition 4.4 or replace it with a reference to a published, independent source. As it stands, the transfer from the SLE loop measure to CLE loop counts is a load-bearing unproved dependency.
  3. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.2(3)] In the weak-limit argument for whole-plane SLE, the proof defines Ω_a as the ν_a-event that the sample curve is not a quasiray and then asserts 'ν(Ω_∞) = 1' for Ω_∞ = ∩_{n=1}^∞ Ω_{1/n}. This preservation of the non-quasiray property under weak convergence is not automatic and is not proved. The events Ω_a are defined under the approximating measures ν_a, and the limit measure ν could, in principle, assign positive mass to curves that are quasirays while each approximating measure assigns mass zero to that set. This gap affects both the whole-plane SLE_κ and whole-plane SLE_κ(ρ) statements in Theorem 1.2.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title page] The title appears as 'QUASISYMMETRIC GEOMETRY OF LOW-DIMENSIONAL RANDOM SP ACES' with an unwanted space in 'SPACES'.
  2. [Section 1.1, last paragraph] The reference '[BE19, Corollay 4.14]' contains a typo: 'Corollay' should be 'Corollary'.
  3. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.2] The sentence 'Ahlfors pointed out that a curve is the image of a quasiconformal mapping from C to C if and only if it is bounded turning' is imprecise: the classical Ahlfors criterion characterizes quasicircles, while the corresponding characterization of quasiarcs is due to Tukia and Väisälä [TV80]. The intended argument is clear, but the wording should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.2, SLE_κ(ρ) paragraph] The phrase 'the driving function W_t are mutually absolutely continuous' has a subject-verb disagreement; it should be 'the driving function W_t is mutually absolutely continuous'.
  5. [Section 3, Lemma 3.1 proof] In the proof of Lemma 3.1, the constant C is used both for the probability P(E_{i,j} ∩ F_{i,j}) = 1 - C and later for a different constant C_1; renaming one of these would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No definitional circularity: the CLE/loop-measure transfer rests on a self-cited but independent theorem, while the Whyburn condition (3) and weak-limit step are correctness gaps rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense of the rubric. Theorem 1.2 uses the independent [MR05] regularity results and Borel–Cantelli to prove non-bounded-turning; these are inputs, not restatements of the conclusion. The passage from radial SLE to whole-plane SLE via weak limits asserts ν(Ω∞)=1 without proving that the 'not a quasiray' event is preserved under weak convergence; this is an omitted argument, not a reduction of the conclusion to an input. Theorem 1.3 attempts to apply Whyburn's theorem with condition (3) '⋃_n D_n = D'; as stated, that condition makes D\⋃_n D_n empty, and the proof's density argument only establishes z ∈ closure(⋃ D_n), not z ∈ ⋃ D_n. This is a serious correctness gap in the carpet claim, but it is a misstatement/misapplication of a standard topological theorem, not a circular derivation: the carpet is not being 'predicted' from a fitted parameter. The main self-citation signal is Proposition 4.4, quoted from [ACSW] (co-authored by Cai), used to convert the zero quasicircle mass of the SLE loop measure (Prop 4.3) into 'a.s. no CLE loop is a quasicircle' (Theorem 4.6). This is load-bearing for Theorem 1.4 and is not proved in the present paper. However, [ACSW, Theorem 1.1] is an external theorem about the SLE loop measure equaling the counting measure of whole-plane CLE loops; it does not restate the non-quasiroundness conclusion and is externally checkable. Under Rule 4, this reliance does not constitute definitional circularity; it is a verification/self-containment concern. The score of 2 reflects that reliance rather than any genuine circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. The central new theorem rests on standard metric geometry facts plus external probabilistic results: the loop-soup construction of CLE, the construction of whole-plane CLE, and especially the ACSW theorem identifying SLE loop measure with the counting measure on whole-plane CLE loops. The last is the only load-bearing citation with overlapping authorship, so it is the main non-self-contained input.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quasiarcs are exactly doubling metric spaces with bounded turning ([TV80, Theorem 4.9]).
    Used repeatedly in Section 3 to reduce the non-quasiarc conclusion to failure of bounded turning.
  • domain assumption If the driving function of a Loewner equation is not 1/2-Holder, then the generated curve is not a quasiconformal image of a segment ([MR05, Theorem 1.1, 1.2, Lemma 2.3]).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.2 to rule out quasiarcs for SLE_kappa from Brownian driving functions.
  • domain assumption CLE_kappa for kappa in (8/3, 4] can be constructed as outer boundaries of clusters of Brownian loop soup, and the loops are almost surely disjoint, simple, non-nested, with diameters tending to 0 ([SW12, Proposition 10.2]).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.3 and in the definition of the CLE space.
  • domain assumption The SLE_kappa loop measure equals the counting measure over loops of the whole-plane CLE_kappa ([ACSW, Theorem 1.1], cited as Proposition 4.4).
    This is the load-bearing external theorem for Theorem 4.6; it is not proved in the paper and is co-authored by one of the present authors.
  • standard math Whyburn's characterization: a set obtained by removing from a simply connected domain countably many disjoint topological disks with diameters tending to 0 and a dense union is homeomorphic to the standard Sierpinski carpet (Theorem 4.1).
    Used to prove Theorem 1.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasisymmetric geometry of low-dimensional random spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/74FPMYDA

@misc{pith2026241206366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasisymmetric geometry of low-dimensional random spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/74FPMYDA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06366}
}
abstract

We initiate a study of the quasisymmetric uniformization of naturally arising random fractals and show that many of them fall outside the realm of quasisymmetric uniformization to simple canonical spaces. We begin with the trace, the graph of Brownian motion, and various variants of the Schramm-Loewner evolution $\mathrm{SLE}_\kappa$ for $\kappa>0$, and show that a.s. neither is a quasiarc. After that, we study the conformal loop ensemble $\mathrm{CLE}_\kappa$, $\kappa \in (\frac{8}{3}, 4]$, and show that the collection of all points outside the loops is a.s. homeomorphic to the standard Sierpi\'nski carpet, but not quasisymmetrically equivalent to a round carpet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06366 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. First three steps in the construction of the Sierpi´nski carpet S1/3. of which says that each metric carpet that is the boundary at infinity of a Gromov hyperbolic group is a quasiround carpet. Bonk provided mild sufficient conditions for a metric carpet X ⊆ C to be quasiround, showing that if the boundaries of the complementary components of X are uniformly relatively separated uniform quasicircles, then the carpet… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahlfors, Quasiconformal reflections, Acta Math., 109, (1963), 291--301

    L. Ahlfors, Quasiconformal reflections, Acta Math., 109, (1963), 291--301

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    Ahlfors, Lectures on Quasiconformal Mapping, American mathematical Society, Providence, (2006)

    L. Ahlfors, Lectures on Quasiconformal Mapping, American mathematical Society, Providence, (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    M. Ang, G. Cai, X. Sun and B. Wu, SLE Loop Measure and Liouville Quantum Gravity, preprint, arXiv: 2409.16547

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    arvenp\"a\

    A. Berlinkov and E. J\"arvenp\"a\"a, Porosities of Mandelbrot percolation, J. Theoret. Probab., 32, (2019), 608--632

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Binder, H

    I. Binder, H. Hakobyan and W. Li, Conformal dimension of the Brownian graph, Duke Math. J., to appear

    work page

  6. [6]

    Bishop and Y

    C. Bishop and Y. Peres, Fractals in Probability and Analysis, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 162, Cambridge University Press, (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    International Congress of Mathematicians, 2, Eur

    M, Bonk, Quasiconformal geometry of fractals. International Congress of Mathematicians, 2, Eur. Math. Soc., Z\"urich, (2006), 1349--1373

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Bonk, Uniformization of Sierpi\'nski carpets in the plane, Invent

    M. Bonk, Uniformization of Sierpi\'nski carpets in the plane, Invent. Math., 186, (2011), 559--665

    work page 2011

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Bonk and B

    M. Bonk and B. Kleiner, Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensional metric spheres, Invent Math., 150, (2002),127--183

    2002

  2. [10]

    Bonk and B

    M. Bonk and B. Kleiner, Conformal dimension and Gromov hyperbolic groups with 2 -sphere boundary, Geom. Topol., 9, (2005), 219--246

    2005

  3. [11]

    M. Bonk, B. Kleiner and S. Merenkov, Rigidity of Schottky sets, Amer. J. Math., 131, (2009), 409--443

    2009

  4. [12]

    M. Bonk, M. Lyubich and S Merenkov, Quasisymmetries of Sierpi\'nski carpet Julia sets, Adv. Math., 301, (2016), 383--422

    2016

  5. [13]

    Bonk and S

    M. Bonk and S. Merenkov, Quasisymmetric rigidity of square Sierpi\'nski carpets, Ann. of Math., 177, (2013), 591--643

    2013

  6. [14]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Powell, Gaussian free field and Liouville quantum gravity, preprint, arXiv: 2404.16642

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cannon, The combinatorial Riemann mapping theorem, Acta Math., 173, (1994),155--234

    J. Cannon, The combinatorial Riemann mapping theorem, Acta Math., 173, (1994),155--234

    1994

  8. [16]

    J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes and R. Durrett, Connectivity properties of Mandelbrot's percolation process, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 77, (1988), 307--324

    1988

  9. [17]

    C. Chen, T. Ojala, E. Rossi and V. Suomala, Fractal percolation, porosity, and dimension, J. Theoret. Probab., 30, (2017), 1471--1498

    2017

  10. [18]

    J. Ding, J. Dub\'edat, A. Dunlap, and H. Falconet, Tightness of Liouville first passage percolation for (0, 2) , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci., 132, (2020), 353--403

    2020

  11. [19]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield, Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ, Invent. Math., 185, (2011), 333--393

    2011

  12. [20]

    Gwynne and J

    E. Gwynne and J. Miller, Existence and uniqueness of the Liouville quantum gravity metric for (0,2) , Invent. Math., 223, (2021), 213--333

    2021

  13. [21]

    Ha\"issinsky, Hyperbolic groups with planar boundaries, Invent

    P. Ha\"issinsky, Hyperbolic groups with planar boundaries, Invent. Math., 201, (2015), 239--307

    2015

  14. [22]

    Hakobyan, Quasisymmetrically co-Hopfian Menger curves and Sierpi\'nski spaces, Adv

    H. Hakobyan, Quasisymmetrically co-Hopfian Menger curves and Sierpi\'nski spaces, Adv. Math., 402, (2022), 108335

    2022

  15. [23]

    Li, Quasisymmetric embeddings of slit Sierpi\'nski carpets, Trans

    H, Hakobyan and W. Li, Quasisymmetric embeddings of slit Sierpi\'nski carpets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 376, (2023), 8877--8918

    2023

  16. [24]

    J, Heinonen, Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Springer-Verlag, New York, (2001)

    2001

  17. [25]

    Hughes, Liouville quantum gravity metrics are not doubling, Electron

    L. Hughes, Liouville quantum gravity metrics are not doubling, Electron. Commun. Probab., 29, (2024), 1 -- 13

    2024

  18. [26]

    Kemppainen, Schramm–Loewner Evolution, SpringerBriefs Math

    A. Kemppainen, Schramm–Loewner Evolution, SpringerBriefs Math. Phys., 24, Springer, (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Kleiner, Hyperbolic groups with low-dimensional boundary, Ann

    M, Kapovich and B. Kleiner, Hyperbolic groups with low-dimensional boundary, Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er., 33, (2000), 647--669

    2000

  20. [28]

    Kemppainen and W

    A. Kemppainen and W. Werner, The nested simple conformal loop ensembles in the Riemann sphere, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 165, (2016), 835--866

    2016

  21. [29]

    Kleiner, The asymptotic geometry of negatively curved spaces: uniformization, geometrization and rigidity, International Congress of Mathematicians, 2, Eur

    B. Kleiner, The asymptotic geometry of negatively curved spaces: uniformization, geometrization and rigidity, International Congress of Mathematicians, 2, Eur. Math. Soc., Z\"urich, (2006), 743--768

    2006

  22. [30]

    Lawler, Conformally Invariant Processes in the Plane, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 114, American Mathematical Society, (2005)

    G. Lawler, Conformally Invariant Processes in the Plane, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 114, American Mathematical Society, (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    Lawler and M

    G. Lawler and M. Rezaei, Minkowski content and natural parameterization for the Schramm–Loewner evolution. Annals of probability, 43(3), (2015), 1082--1120

    2015

  24. [32]

    Lawler and W

    G. Lawler and W. Werner, The Brownian loop soup, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 128, (2004), 565--588

    2004

  25. [33]

    Lawler, O

    G. Lawler, O. Schramm and W. Werner, Conformal restriction: the chordal case, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 16, (2003), 917--955

    2003

  26. [34]

    Mackay, J

    J. Mackay, J. Tyson and K. Wildrick, Modulus and Poincar\'e inequalities on non-self-similar Sierpinski carpets, Geom. Funct. Anal., 23 (2013), 985--1034

    2013

  27. [35]

    Mandelbrot, Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades- divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier, J

    B. Mandelbrot, Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades- divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier, J. Fluid Mech., 62, (1974), 331--358

    1974

  28. [36]

    Mandelbrot, The fractal geometry of nature revised and enlarged edition, New York, WH Freeman and Co., (1983)

    B. Mandelbrot, The fractal geometry of nature revised and enlarged edition, New York, WH Freeman and Co., (1983)

    1983

  29. [37]

    Marshall and S

    D. Marshall and S. Rohde, The Loewner Differential Equation and Slit Mappings, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 18, 763--778, (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    Merenkov, A Sierpi\'nski carpet with the co-Hopfian property, Invent

    S. Merenkov, A Sierpi\'nski carpet with the co-Hopfian property, Invent. Math, 180, (2010), 361--388

    2010

  31. [39]

    Wildrick, Quasisymmetric Koebe uniformization., Rev

    S Merenkov and K. Wildrick, Quasisymmetric Koebe uniformization., Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 29, (2013), 859--909

    2013

  32. [40]

    Meyer, Snowballs are quasiballs, Trans

    D. Meyer, Snowballs are quasiballs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362, (2010), 1247--1300

    2010

  33. [41]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield, Imaginary geometry I: interacting SLEs, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 164, (2016), 553--705

    2016

  34. [42]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield, Imaginary Geometry IV: interior rays, whole-plane reversibility, and space-filling trees, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 169, (2017), 729--869

    2017

  35. [43]

    Miller, N

    J. Miller, N. Sun and D. Wilson, The Hausdorff dimension of the CLE gasket, Ann. Probab., 42, (2014), 1644--1665

    2014

  36. [44]

    Morters and Y

    P. Morters and Y. Peres, Brownian Motion, Cambridge University Press, (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Rohde and O

    S. Rohde and O. Schramm, Basic properties of SLE, Ann. of Math., 161, (2005), 883--924

    2005

  38. [46]

    Schramm, Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees, Israel J

    O. Schramm, Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees, Israel J. Math., 118, (2000), 221--288

    2000

  39. [47]

    Schramm, S

    O. Schramm, S. Sheffield and D. Wilson, Conformal radii for conformal loop ensembles, Comm. Math. Phys., 288, (2009), 43--53

    2009

  40. [48]

    Serban and W

    N. Serban and W. Wendelin, Random soups, carpets and fractal dimensions, J. Lond. Math. Soc., 83 (2011), 789--809

    2011

  41. [49]

    Sheffield, Exploration trees and conformal loop ensembles, Duke Mathematical Journal, 147, 79--129, (2009)

    S. Sheffield, Exploration trees and conformal loop ensembles, Duke Mathematical Journal, 147, 79--129, (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Sheffield and W

    S. Sheffield and W. Werner, Conformal loop ensembles: the Markovian characterization and the loop-soup construction, Ann. of Math., 176, (2012), 1827--1917

    2012

  43. [51]

    Sullivan, Conformal dynamical systems

    D. Sullivan, Conformal dynamical systems. In Geometric dynamics, Lecture Notes in Math.,Springer, Berlin, 1007, (1983), 725--752

    1983

  44. [52]

    Sullivan, Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics I

    D. Sullivan, Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics I. Solution of the Fatou-Julia problem on wandering domains, Ann. of Math., 122, (1985), 401--418

    1985

  45. [53]

    Sullivan, Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics II

    D. Sullivan, Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics II. Structural Stability Implies Hyperbolocity for Kleinian Groups, Acta Math., 155, (1985), 243--260

    1985

  46. [54]

    Theory Related Fields, 179, (2021), 1023--1046

    S Troscheit, On quasisymmetric embeddings of the Brownian map and continuum trees, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 179, (2021), 1023--1046

    2021

  47. [55]

    ais\"al\

    P. Tukia and J. V\"ais\"al\"a, Quasisymmetric Embeddings of Metric Spaces, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 5, (1980), 97--114

    1980

  48. [56]

    Whyburn, Topological characterization of the Sierpi\'nski curve, Fund Math., 45, (1958), 320--340

    G. Whyburn, Topological characterization of the Sierpi\'nski curve, Fund Math., 45, (1958), 320--340

    1958

  49. [57]

    Wildrick, Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensionalmetric planes, Proc

    K. Wildrick, Quasisymmetric parametrizations of two-dimensionalmetric planes, Proc. London Math. Soc., 97, (2008), 783--812

    2008

  50. [58]

    Wu, Conformal restriction: The radial case, Stochastic Process

    H. Wu, Conformal restriction: The radial case, Stochastic Process. Appl., 125, (2015), 552-570

    2015

  51. [59]

    Zhan, Reversibility of whole-plane SLE, Probab

    D. Zhan, Reversibility of whole-plane SLE, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 161, (2015), 561--618

    2015

  52. [60]

    Zhan, SLE loop measures, Probab

    D. Zhan, SLE loop measures, Probab. Theory Related Fields, 179, (2021), 345--406

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.