Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 166 references

A Comprehensive Survey of Electrical Stimulation Haptic Feedback in Human-Computer Interaction

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A systematic review of 110 studies maps electrical haptic feedback in human-computer interaction, finding the field concentrated on the forearm and reporting that hybrid multimodal feedback outperforms unimodal feedback.

desk verdict Useful, well-structured survey of electrotactile HCI whose corpus data needs to be released before the 'comprehensive' claim is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.21477 v2 pith:74Z5YEDU submitted 2025-04-30 cs.HC

Simin Yang , Xian Wang , Yang Li , Lik-Hang Lee , Tristan Camille Braud , Pan Hui This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords electricalhapticfeedbackelectrotactilestimulationmuscleperceptionmultimodalwearabledevicesvirtualrealitysystematicreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish a reliable, systematic map of electrical haptic feedback in human-computer interaction by analyzing 110 research papers from 2014 to 2024. It claims that the literature supports specific quantitative baselines: the forearm is the most studied site (47.3% of papers), typical tactile stimulation uses intensities of 0–6 mA, pulse widths of 0–400 microseconds, and frequencies of 0–300 Hz, and hybrid multimodal feedback generally beats unimodal feedback in accuracy and immersion. If the map is correct, designers and researchers gain a common starting point for device design, parameter calibration, and gap-filling research, with full-body feedback identified as the clearest open area.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the corpus itself plus a structured 15-field data extraction rubric (DE1–DE15). Each of the 110 included studies is coded for objective, stimulation location, device type, electrode type, waveform, frequency, duration, amplitude, participants, experimental method, and conclusions; those fields feed the distribution tables, density plots, and qualitative comparisons that produce the paper's quantitative claims. The stratification by stimulation site and the density plots of stimulation intensity, pulse width, and frequency are the mechanism that turns a list of papers into the 47.3% forearm share and the 0–6 mA / 0–400 microsecond / 0–300 Hz baselines.

What would settle it

Re-run the search in a broader set of bibliographic databases and reconstruct the corpus from the stated keyword set and eligibility criteria. If the stimulation-site distribution changes materially, for example the forearm share falls well below 47.3% when additional leg or torso studies are included, the review's gap analysis would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of the paper is that a systematic reading of 110 studies from 2014 to 2024 supports a quantitative description of electrical haptic feedback in human-computer interaction. The forearm is the dominant stimulation site (47.3% of the corpus), followed by the fingertip (20.0%), upper arm (14.5%), finger (9.1%), and wrist (8.2%); effective tactile stimulation clusters at 0–6 mA, pulse widths of 0–400 microseconds, and frequencies of 0–300 Hz; and in direct comparisons, hybrid multimodal feedback combining electrotactile stimulation with vibrotactile, force, or thermal cues generally achieves higher accuracy and immersion than unimodal feedback. The paper further claims that electrical stimulation can elicit both tactile sensations such as texture, pressure, shape, and temperature, and kinesthetic or pseudo-kinesthetic effects through muscle activation, and it identifies the main bottlenecks as device standardization, reliance on subjective reports, open-loop rendering, skin-impedance variability, manual calibration, and limited participant demographics.

Load-bearing premise

The whole picture rests on the assumption that the chosen literature databases plus a short list of six journals capture essentially all relevant 2014–2024 work on electrical haptic feedback; if substantial relevant studies sit in other bibliographic databases, the reported percentages, including the 47.3% forearm share, could be skewed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A designer starting an electrotactile project can use 0–6 mA, 0–400 microsecond pulses, and 0–300 Hz as first-guess ranges rather than starting from scratch.
  • Researchers should expect that claims about body sites outside the upper limb rest on far fewer studies than the forearm and fingertip, so those areas need dedicated empirical work.
  • Hybrid systems that pair electrotactile stimulation with vibrotactile, force, or thermal cues are the more promising path for accuracy and immersion, according to the reviewed comparisons.
  • The field needs shared benchmarks and standardized reporting of electrode type, waveform, and stimulation parameters before cross-study comparisons become reliable.
  • Full-body electrotactile systems are an open opportunity, since the reviewed literature offers little coverage beyond the hands, arms, and wrists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the review is restricted to a specific set of literature databases, one direct test of its distribution claims would be to search additional bibliographic databases and see whether the forearm's 47.3% share holds.
  • The reported lack of AI-driven tactile rendering suggests a concrete next step: closed-loop systems that adapt pulse parameters in real time to measured skin impedance or muscle response.
  • The upper-limb concentration may partly reflect convenience of experimentation rather than where the technology performs best, so body sites with different receptor density and skin impedance could behave quite differently from the reported averages.
  • If hybrid multimodal feedback is as consistently superior as the review reports, a sensible benchmark for future electrotactile studies would be to compare new systems against the best available unimodal baseline rather than against no feedback at all.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a systematic review of electrical stimulation haptic feedback in human-computer interaction, following the PRISMA 2020 reporting guideline. The authors searched ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and six selected journals, screened 543 records down to 110 included studies, and extracted 15 data items (DE1-DE15) covering devices, stimulation parameters, perception, multisensory comparisons, and applications. The paper's central quantitative claims are that the forearm is the most studied stimulation site (47.3%, n=52), that typical tactile stimulation parameters are 0-6 mA intensity, 0-400 µs pulse width (written as "0-400 s" in the text), and 0-300 Hz frequency, and that hybrid multimodal feedback generally outperforms unimodal feedback in accuracy and immersion. It also identifies full-body electrotactile feedback as an underexplored area and proposes future directions including multimodal integration, high-resolution devices, adaptive stimulation, and full-body systems.

Significance. If the quantitative corpus-level statements are reproducible, this survey would provide a useful baseline for researchers and developers in electrotactile HCI. The paper's strengths include a clearly documented PRISMA flow, a structured extraction rubric (DE1-DE15), quantitative mapping of body sites and stimulation parameters, and a systematic comparison of feedback modalities. The discussion of demographic limitations and open-loop rendering is also a useful contribution. However, the corpus list and extraction data are not released, and the search scope excludes several venues that publish HCI haptics work; as a result, the headline percentages and the gap analysis are not independently auditable. The central value of the paper therefore depends on transparency measures that are currently missing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II-B, Section II-C] The search strategy is limited to ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and six selected journals (Nature Communications, Nature Electronics, npj Flexible Electronics, Nature Machine Intelligence, Science Advances, Science Robotics). Many HCI venues that publish electrical haptic feedback work, such as Virtual Reality (Springer), International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (Elsevier), and Human Factors (SAGE), are not included. Since the paper's headline claims are corpus-level distributions (e.g., the 47.3% forearm share and the statement that full-body feedback is underexplored), this coverage restriction can change those conclusions; the paper neither justifies the completeness of this set nor reports a sensitivity analysis. I recommend either expanding the search or explicitly documenting this coverage limitation as a bound on the claims.
  2. [Section II-D, Section II-E] The manuscript does not publish the list of the 110 included studies or the DE1-DE15 extraction data. As a result, the percentages in Section III-A, including the 47.3% forearm figure, cannot be independently audited: the reader cannot check which studies were coded to which DE5 location or verify the screening decisions. A supplementary file with the full corpus and the extraction table should be provided; at minimum, the per-DE5 counts per study and the exclusion decisions should be released so that the corpus-level claims can be reproduced.
  3. [Section III-C, Figure 6] The paper's key quantitative parameter summary is not fully reproducible. The pulse-width range is reported as "0-400 s" both in Section III-C and in the Discussion, but the unit should be microseconds (µs), as correctly stated earlier in Section I.C.2. In addition, the density plots do not report the number of studies contributing to each plot; because the text says only studies with explicitly reported data were included, the reader cannot judge how representative the reported ranges are. Please fix the unit and add the sample size (N) for each plot, ideally with the underlying extracted values.
  4. [Section II-C, Section III-A, Section IV.C.4] Eligibility criterion (3) excludes studies that do not address user experience, such as purely technical implementations or device development without experimental or user data. This is a defensible scope choice, but it directly shapes the device and body-site gap analysis: hardware-only electrotactile papers on underexplored body regions would be excluded by construction, which reinforces the conclusion that full-body feedback is underexplored. The authors should acknowledge this bias and, if possible, quantify how many technical-only papers were excluded and at which body sites, since this bears directly on the comprehensiveness claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II-B] The keyword list contains the term "electrotactile" twice; please remove the duplicate.
  2. [References] Reference [99] lists the author as "M. DrAlonzo"; this should likely be "M. D'Alonzo" and should be checked against the original publication.
  3. [Figure 3] The caption says "Publications Per Y ear" (typo for "Year"), and the figure plots only venues with annual publication counts of at least two; the caption should state this inclusion rule and, ideally, provide the remaining venues in a table for completeness.
  4. [Section II-E, Table II] The text at Section II.E describes DE9-DE12 as documenting "waveform, frequency, bandwidth, and intensity," but Table II labels DE11 as "Stimulation Duration" and does not use "bandwidth"; please align the terminology to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's quantitative claims are descriptive aggregates of the included studies, not derivations from fitted inputs or self-cited results.

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review, not a derivation chain with predictions or fitted parameters. Its central quantitative claims, such as the forearm being the most studied site (n=52, 47.3%) and typical stimulation parameters (0-6 mA, 0-400 microseconds, 0-300 Hz), are aggregates of data extracted from the 110 included studies via the DE1-DE15 rubric (Section II-E) and reported directly in Section III. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no definition of an input in terms of an output, and no uniqueness theorem invoked to force a choice. The electrical stimulation model equations in Section I-B are explicitly reproduced from Kajimoto [23] and Rattay [24] as background physiological explanation, and they are not used as evidence for the survey's corpus-level findings. Author self-citations (e.g., Lee et al. [4] and Bermejo and Hui [9]) appear only as examples of related work and metaverse/haptics context, not as load-bearing support for any survey conclusion. The concern that the corpus may be incomplete because only ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and six selected journals were searched is a correctness or external-validity risk, not circularity: the reported percentages are computed from the stated corpus by definition of a descriptive survey, and no circular step is exhibited. Therefore the central synthesis is self-contained with respect to the circularity criteria, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a survey, the paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. The load-bearing assumptions are about the literature search and eligibility scope, which determine the corpus and hence all quantitative summaries.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore, supplemented by six high-impact journals, are sufficient to capture the relevant HCI literature on electrical haptic feedback (Section II-B).
    The search strategy selects these databases based on the h-index of top-20 HCI venues; papers outside these venues are not systematically searched, so the corpus is a sample of the literature.
  • domain assumption The eligibility criteria (human users, HCI focus, user experience explored) define the field boundary; medical applications and purely technical implementations are excluded (Section II-C).
    This scope decision shapes all reported statistics and gaps; a different boundary would change the corpus and conclusions.
  • standard math PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines provide a valid framework for this systematic review (Section II).
    PRISMA is a methodological standard for reporting systematic reviews; using it is appropriate but does not guarantee search completeness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Survey of Electrical Stimulation Haptic Feedback in Human-Computer Interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/74Z5YEDU

@misc{pith2026250421477,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Survey of Electrical Stimulation Haptic Feedback in Human-Computer Interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/74Z5YEDU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.21477}
}
read the original abstract

Haptic perception and feedback play a pivotal role in interactive experiences, forming an essential component of human-computer interaction (HCI). In recent years, the field of haptic interaction has witnessed significant advancements, particularly in the area of electrical haptic feedback, driving innovation across various domains. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research and the latest developments in electrical haptic interaction, this study systematically reviews the literature in this area. Our investigation covers key aspects including haptic devices, haptic perception mechanisms, the comparison and integration of electrical haptic feedback with other feedback modalities, and their diverse applications. Specifically, we conduct a systematic analysis of 110 research papers to explore the forefront of electrical haptic feedback, providing insights into its latest trends, challenges, and future directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.21477 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electrical representation of electrical stimulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram showing the stages of identification, screening, and inclusion of our systematic search. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Publications Per Year (N=110). The chart marks the journals/conferences where the annual number of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electrotactile Devices. (a)(e) Fingertip solutions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Flow Perception Diagram: This Sankey diagram visualizes the data flow from different classifications through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Density plots. The left displays the density plot of stimulation intensity, the middle represents the density plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Flow Perception Diagram: This Sankey diagram visualizes the data flow from stimulation location through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities,

    J. D. N. Dionisio, W. G. B. Iii, and R. Gilbert, “3d virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities,” ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1–38, 2013

    2013

  2. [2]

    What is metaverse?a definition based on qualitative meta-synthesis,

    M. Weinberger, “What is metaverse?a definition based on qualitative meta-synthesis,” Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 310, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review,

    G. D. Ritterbusch and M. R. Teichmann, “Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review,” Ieee Access, vol. 11, pp. 12 368–12 377, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda,

    L.-H. Lee, T. Braud, P. Y . Zhou, L. Wang, D. Xu, Z. Lin, A. Kumar, C. Bermejo, P. Hui et al. , “All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda,” Foundations and trends® in human-computer interaction, vol. 18, no. 2–3, pp. 100–337, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    Electrotactile perception properties and its applications: A review,

    Z. Zhou, Y . Yang, J. Liu, J. Zeng, X. Wang, and H. Liu, “Electrotactile perception properties and its applications: A review,” IEEE Transac- tions on Haptics , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 464–478, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Haptic perception: A tutorial,

    S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, “Haptic perception: A tutorial,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1439–1459, 2009

    2009

  7. [7]

    Haptics in virtual reality and multimedia,

    N. Magnenat-Thalmann and U. Bonanni, “Haptics in virtual reality and multimedia,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 6–11, 2006

    2006

  8. [8]

    Survey on haptic feedback through sensory illusions in interactive systems,

    M. Kurzweg, Y . Weiss, M. O. Ernst, A. Schmidt, and K. Wolf, “Survey on haptic feedback through sensory illusions in interactive systems,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1–39, 2024

    2024

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality,

    C. Bermejo and P. Hui, “A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Information transmission across the skin: High- resolution tactile sensory aids for the deaf and the blind,

    F. A. Saunders, “Information transmission across the skin: High- resolution tactile sensory aids for the deaf and the blind,” International journal of neuroscience , vol. 19, no. 1-4, pp. 21–28, 1983

    1983

  3. [11]

    Physiological responses of sensory afferents in glabrous and hairy skin of humans and monkeys,

    A. Goodwin and H. Wheat, “Physiological responses of sensory afferents in glabrous and hairy skin of humans and monkeys,” 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in hci,

    Y . Visell, “Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in hci,” Interacting with Computers , vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 38–53, 2009

    2009

  5. [13]

    Superpowered skin,

    J. Gould, “Superpowered skin,” Nature, vol. 563, no. 7732, pp. S84– S85, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Grunwald, Human haptic perception: Basics and applications

    M. Grunwald, Human haptic perception: Basics and applications . Springer Science & Business Media, 2008

    2008

  7. [15]

    Physiology, sensory receptors,

    A. Marzvanyan and A. F. Alhawaj, “Physiology, sensory receptors,” 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Kinesthetic inputs,

    J. L. Taylor, “Kinesthetic inputs,” in Neuroscience in the 21st century: from basic to clinical . Springer, 2022, pp. 1339–1373

    2022

  9. [17]

    El Saddik, M

    A. El Saddik, M. Orozco, M. Eid, and J. Cha, Haptics technologies: Bringing touch to multimedia . Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    2011

  10. [18]

    B. M. Carlson, The human body: linking structure and function . Academic Press, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    The sensory neurons of touch,

    V . E. Abraira and D. D. Ginty, “The sensory neurons of touch,” Neuron, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 618–639. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.051

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Human haptic perception,

    A. El Saddik, M. Orozco, M. Eid, J. Cha, A. E. Saddik, M. Orozco, M. Eid, and J. Cha, “Human haptic perception,” Haptics technologies: Bringing touch to multimedia , pp. 45–66, 2011

    2011

  13. [21]

    Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations,

    K. S. Hale and K. M. Stanney, “Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations,” IEEE computer graphics and applications , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 33–39, 2004

    2004

  14. [22]

    Some experience with flight-related electrocutaneous and vibrotactile displays,

    T. Triggs, W. Levison, and R. Sanneman, “Some experience with flight-related electrocutaneous and vibrotactile displays,” Cutaneous communication systems and devices , pp. 57–64, 1974

    1974

  15. [23]

    Electro-tactile display: principle and hardware,

    H. Kajimoto, “Electro-tactile display: principle and hardware,” Perva- sive Haptics: Science, Design, and Application , pp. 79–96, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation,

    F. Rattay and M. Aberham, “Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1201–1209, 1993

    1993

  17. [25]

    Energy-efficient electrical stimulation sys- tems,

    A. Banerjee and S. Nag, “Energy-efficient electrical stimulation sys- tems,” Handbook of Neuroengineering , pp. 1–26, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Haptics: The present and future of artificial touch sensation,

    H. Culbertson, S. B. Schorr, and A. M. Okamura, “Haptics: The present and future of artificial touch sensation,” Annual review of control, robotics, and autonomous systems , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 385–409, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    New advances for haptic rendering: state of the art,

    P. Xia, “New advances for haptic rendering: state of the art,” The Visual Computer, vol. 34, pp. 271–287, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Haptic systems in user interfaces: state of the art survey,

    F. G. Hamza-Lup, K. Bergeron, and D. Newton, “Haptic systems in user interfaces: state of the art survey,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference , 2019, pp. 141–148

    2019

  21. [29]

    Haptic devices: Wearability-based taxonomy and literature review,

    A. Adilkhanov, M. Rubagotti, and Z. Kappassov, “Haptic devices: Wearability-based taxonomy and literature review,” IEEE Access , vol. 10, pp. 91 923–91 947, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    haptics on-demand: A survey on encountered-type haptic displays,

    V . R. Mercado, M. Marchal, and A. L ´ecuyer, “haptics on-demand: A survey on encountered-type haptic displays,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 449–464, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Survey on hand- based haptic interaction for virtual reality,

    Q. Tong, W. Wei, Y . Zhang, J. Xiao, and D. Wang, “Survey on hand- based haptic interaction for virtual reality,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 154–170, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    A systematic review of commercial smart gloves: Current status and applications,

    M. Caeiro-Rodr ´ıguez, I. Otero-Gonz ´alez, F. A. Mikic-Fonte, and M. Llamas-Nistal, “A systematic review of commercial smart gloves: Current status and applications,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 2667, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Toward whole-hand kinesthetic feedback: A survey of force feedback gloves,

    D. Wang, M. Song, A. Naqash, Y . Zheng, W. Xu, and Y . Zhang, “Toward whole-hand kinesthetic feedback: A survey of force feedback gloves,” IEEE transactions on haptics , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    A survey of glove-based systems and their applications,

    L. Dipietro, A. M. Sabatini, and P. Dario, “A survey of glove-based systems and their applications,” Ieee transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part c (applications and reviews) , vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 461–482, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: taxonomy, review, and perspectives,

    C. Pacchierotti, S. Sinclair, M. Solazzi, A. Frisoli, V . Hayward, and D. Prattichizzo, “Wearable haptic systems for the fingertip and the hand: taxonomy, review, and perspectives,” IEEE transactions on haptics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 580–600, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    A survey of mid-air ultrasonic tactile feedback,

    I. Rakkolainen, A. Sand, and R. Raisamo, “A survey of mid-air ultrasonic tactile feedback,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 94–944

    2019

  29. [37]

    A survey of mid-air ultrasound haptics and its applications,

    I. Rakkolainen, E. Freeman, A. Sand, R. Raisamo, and S. Brewster, “A survey of mid-air ultrasound haptics and its applications,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2–19, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Contactless haptic feedback: State of the art,

    F. Arafsha, L. Zhang, H. Dong, and A. El Saddik, “Contactless haptic feedback: State of the art,” in 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games (HAVE) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6. 20

    2015

  31. [39]

    Non-intrusive haptic interfaces: State-of-the art survey,

    M. Y . Tsalamlal, N. Ouarti, and M. Ammi, “Non-intrusive haptic interfaces: State-of-the art survey,” inInternational Workshop on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design . Springer, 2013, pp. 1–9

    2013

  32. [40]

    A survey on hap- tics: Communication, sensing and feedback,

    M. Emami, A. Bayat, R. Tafazolli, and A. Quddus, “A survey on hap- tics: Communication, sensing and feedback,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Tactile iot and 5g & beyond schemes as key enabling technologies for the future metaverse,

    K. A. Tychola, K. V oulgaridis, and T. Lagkas, “Tactile iot and 5g & beyond schemes as key enabling technologies for the future metaverse,” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 363–385, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    A comprehensive survey of the tactile internet: State-of-the-art and research directions,

    N. Promwongsa, A. Ebrahimzadeh, D. Naboulsi, S. Kianpisheh, F. Belqasmi, R. Glitho, N. Crespi, and O. Alfandi, “A comprehensive survey of the tactile internet: State-of-the-art and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 472– 523, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Methodology for maximizing information transmission of haptic devices: A survey,

    H. Z. Tan, S. Choi, F. W. Lau, and F. Abnousi, “Methodology for maximizing information transmission of haptic devices: A survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 945–965, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Toward haptic communications over the 5g tactile internet,

    K. Antonakoglou, X. Xu, E. Steinbach, T. Mahmoodi, and M. Dohler, “Toward haptic communications over the 5g tactile internet,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3034–3059, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Social touch technology: A survey of haptic technology for social touch,

    G. Huisman, “Social touch technology: A survey of haptic technology for social touch,” IEEE transactions on haptics , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 391–408, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    A descriptive analysis of a formative decade of research in affective haptic system design,

    P. Vyas, U. M. Desai, K. Yamakawa, and K. Maclean, “A descriptive analysis of a formative decade of research in affective haptic system design,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2023, pp. 1–23

    2023

  39. [47]

    Designing affective haptic experience for wellness and social communication: where designers need affective neuroscience and psychology,

    K. E. MacLean, “Designing affective haptic experience for wellness and social communication: where designers need affective neuroscience and psychology,” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences , vol. 45, p. 101113, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Affective haptics: Current research and future directions,

    M. A. Eid and H. Al Osman, “Affective haptics: Current research and future directions,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 26–40, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Soft, wearable robotics and haptics: Technologies, trends, and emerging applications,

    M. Zhu, S. Biswas, S. I. Dinulescu, N. Kastor, E. W. Hawkes, and Y . Visell, “Soft, wearable robotics and haptics: Technologies, trends, and emerging applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 246–272, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Wearable soft technologies for haptic sensing and feedback,

    J. Yin, R. Hinchet, H. Shea, and C. Majidi, “Wearable soft technologies for haptic sensing and feedback,” Advanced Functional Materials , vol. 31, no. 39, p. 2007428, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Survey of pseudo-haptics: Haptic feedback design and application proposals,

    Y . Ujitoko and Y . Ban, “Survey of pseudo-haptics: Haptic feedback design and application proposals,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 699–711, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Electrotactile feedback applications for hand and arm interactions: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and future directions,

    P. Kourtesis, F. Argelaguet, S. Vizcay, M. Marchal, and C. Pacchierotti, “Electrotactile feedback applications for hand and arm interactions: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and future directions,” IEEE trans- actions on haptics , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 479–496, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,

    M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. M. Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, S. E. Brennan et al., “The prisma 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” bmj, vol. 372, 2021

    2020

  46. [54]

    A proposal of virtual food texture by electric muscle stimulation,

    A. Niijima and T. Ogawa, “A proposal of virtual food texture by electric muscle stimulation,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–6

    2016

  47. [55]

    Thermal sensation presentation to the forehead using electrical stimulation: comparison with other tactile modalities,

    T. Saito, J. Zhang, T. Kameoka, and H. Kajimoto, “Thermal sensation presentation to the forehead using electrical stimulation: comparison with other tactile modalities,” in 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) . IEEE, Jul. 2021, p. 888893. [Online]. Available: http://dx.do...

    2021

  48. [56]

    Lipio: Enabling lips as both input and output surface,

    A. Jingu, Y . Tanaka, and P. Lopes, “Lipio: Enabling lips as both input and output surface,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI 23. ACM, Apr. 2023, p. 114. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580775

    2023

  49. [58]

    Can you ear me?: A comparison of different private and public notification channels for the earlobe,

    D. Stanke, T. Duente, K. C. Demir, and M. Rohs, “Can you ear me?: A comparison of different private and public notification channels for the earlobe,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , vol. 7, no. 3, p. 123, Sep

  50. [59]

    Design and study of a multi-channel electrical muscle stimulation toolkit for human augmentation,

    M. Kono, Y . Ishiguro, T. Miyaki, and J. Rekimoto, “Design and study of a multi-channel electrical muscle stimulation toolkit for human augmentation,” in Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference , ser. AH2018. ACM, Feb. 2018, p. 18. [Online]. Available: ...

    2018

  51. [60]

    Electrical head actuation: Enabling interactive systems to directly manipulate head orientation,

    Y . Tanaka, J. Nishida, and P. Lopes, “Electrical head actuation: Enabling interactive systems to directly manipulate head orientation,” in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 22. ACM, Apr. 2022, p. 115. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.114...

    2022

  52. [61]

    Shouldertapper: Providing directional cues through electrotactile feedback for target acquisition in pick-by-light systems,

    V . D. Seetohul, K. Schweitzer, and M. Bhmer, “Shouldertapper: Providing directional cues through electrotactile feedback for target acquisition in pick-by-light systems,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia , ser. MUM 24. ACM, De...

    2024

  53. [62]

    Providing haptics to walls & heavy objects in virtual reality by means of electrical muscle stimulation,

    P. Lopes, S. You, L.-P. Cheng, S. Marwecki, and P. Baudisch, “Providing haptics to walls & heavy objects in virtual reality by means of electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 17. ACM, May 2...

    2017

  54. [63]

    Multichannel electrotactile feedback with spatial and mixed coding for closed-loop control of grasping force in hand prostheses,

    S. Dosen, M. Markovic, M. Strbac, M. Belic, V . Kojic, G. Bijelic, T. Keller, and D. Farina, “Multichannel electrotactile feedback with spatial and mixed coding for closed-loop control of grasping force in hand prostheses,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitatio...

    2017

  55. [64]

    Let your body move: a prototyping toolkit for wearable force feedback with electrical muscle stimulation,

    M. Pfeiffer, T. Duente, and M. Rohs, “Let your body move: a prototyping toolkit for wearable force feedback with electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services , ser. MobileHCI ...

    2016

  56. [65]

    Paired-ems: Enhancing electrical muscle stimulation (ems)- based force feedback experience by stimulating both muscles in an- tagonistic pairs,

    C.-Y . Cheng, Y . Chen, S. W. Handani, A. Balabantaray, and M. Y . Chen, “Paired-ems: Enhancing electrical muscle stimulation (ems)- based force feedback experience by stimulating both muscles in an- tagonistic pairs,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in C...

    2024

  57. [66]

    Perception and performance of electrical stimulation for proprioception,

    C. M. Blondin, E. Ivanova, J. Eden, and E. Burdet, “Perception and performance of electrical stimulation for proprioception,” in 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 4550–4554

    2021

  58. [67]

    Optimal motor point search using mm-order electrode arrays,

    S. Matsubara, T. Watanabe, T. Suzuki, S. Wakisaka, K. Aoyama, and M. Inami, “Optimal motor point search using mm-order electrode arrays,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, p. 5897058981, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3285422

    2023

  59. [68]

    Stiffness display by muscle contraction via electric muscle stimulation,

    Y . Kurita, T. Ishikawa, and T. Tsuji, “Stiffness display by muscle contraction via electric muscle stimulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 1, no. 2, p. 10141019, Jul. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2016.2529689

    2016

  60. [69]

    The effect of multisensory pseudo-haptic feedback on perception of virtual weight,

    J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Lee, “The effect of multisensory pseudo-haptic feedback on perception of virtual weight,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, p. 51295140, 2022. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3140438

    2022

  61. [70]

    Two-channel electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback of fingers of prosthesis,

    K. Choi, P. Kim, K.-S. Kim, and S. Kim, “Two-channel electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback of fingers of prosthesis,” in 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, Oct. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/...

    2016

  62. [71]

    Dualems: Two-channel arbitrary waveform electrical muscle stimulation device to design interference stimulation,

    H. Ohara and S. Hasegawa, “Dualems: Two-channel arbitrary waveform electrical muscle stimulation device to design interference stimulation,” in Augmented Humans 2022 , ser. AHs 2022. ACM, Mar. 2022, p. 195202. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 3519391.3519415

    2022

  63. [72]

    Mixed-modality stimulation to evoke two modalities simultaneously in one channel for electrocutaneous sensory feedback,

    K. Choi, P. Kim, K.-S. Kim, and S. Kim, “Mixed-modality stimulation to evoke two modalities simultaneously in one channel for electrocutaneous sensory feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , p. 11, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.do...

    2017

  64. [73]

    Sync-vr: Synchronizing your senses to conquer motion sickness for enriching in-vehicle virtual reality,

    A. I. A. M. Elsharkawy, A. A. S. Ataya, D. Yeo, E. An, S. Hwang, and S. Kim, “Sync-vr: Synchronizing your senses to conquer motion sickness for enriching in-vehicle virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2024, pp. 1–17

    2024

  65. [74]

    Understanding challenges and opportunities of technology-supported sign language learning,

    S. Faltaous, T. Winkler, C. Schneegass, U. Gruenefeld, and S. Schneegass, “Understanding challenges and opportunities of technology-supported sign language learning,” in Augmented Humans 2022, ser. AHs 2022. ACM, Mar. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/351939...

    2022

  66. [76]

    Impacto: Simulating physical impact by combining tactile stimulation with electrical muscle stimulation,

    P. Lopes, A. Ion, and P. Baudisch, “Impacto: Simulating physical impact by combining tactile stimulation with electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, ser. UIST 15. ACM, Nov

  67. [77]

    Adding force feedback to mixed reality experiences and games using electrical muscle stimulation,

    P. Lopes, S. You, A. Ion, and P. Baudisch, “Adding force feedback to mixed reality experiences and games using electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 18. ACM, Apr. 2018, p

    2018

  68. [78]

    Impact of arm dominance and location on detecting electrotactile stimuli during voluntary motor activation in older adults,

    N. M. Cai, E. G. Medina, S. Gonzalez, A. Duong, and N. Gurari, “Impact of arm dominance and location on detecting electrotactile stimuli during voluntary motor activation in older adults,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 16, no. 4, p. 484490, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available...

    2023

  69. [79]

    A comparison between separated electrodes and concentric electrodes for electrotactile stim- ulation,

    B. Stephens-Fripp, R. Mutlu, and G. Alici, “A comparison between separated electrodes and concentric electrodes for electrotactile stim- ulation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 241–252, 2020

    2020

  70. [80]

    Self-powered electro-tactile system for virtual tactile experiences,

    Y . Shi, F. Wang, J. Tian, S. Li, E. Fu, J. Nie, R. Lei, Y . Ding, X. Chen, and Z. L. Wang, “Self-powered electro-tactile system for virtual tactile experiences,” Science Advances , vol. 7, no. 6, Feb

  71. [81]

    Embedded electrotactile feedback system for hand prostheses using matrix electrode and electronic skin,

    Y . Abbass, M. Saleh, S. Dosen, and M. Valle, “Embedded electrotactile feedback system for hand prostheses using matrix electrode and electronic skin,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 912925, Oct. 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dx.do...

    2021

  72. [82]

    A wearable armband ifeel for electrotactile stimulation,

    S. Cheng and D. Zhang, “A wearable armband ifeel for electrotactile stimulation,” in 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) . IEEE, Jul. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2017.8005012

    2017

  73. [83]

    The relationship between energy, phase charge, impedance, and perceived sensation in electrotactile stimulation,

    A. Akhtar, B. Boyce, and T. Bretl, “The relationship between energy, phase charge, impedance, and perceived sensation in electrotactile stimulation,” in 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS) . IEEE, 2014, pp. 69–74

    2014

  74. [84]

    Psy- chophysical characteristics of electrotactile stimulation: The impact of changes in stimulation pulse width and frequency on human percep- tion,

    D. J. Djozic, D. Bojanic, G. Krajoski, N. Popov, and V . Ilic, “Psy- chophysical characteristics of electrotactile stimulation: The impact of changes in stimulation pulse width and frequency on human percep- tion,” in 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics a...

    2015

  75. [85]

    The short-term repeatability of subdermal electrical stimulation for sensory feedback,

    J. Dong, E. N. Kamavuako, S. Dosen, W. Jensen, and B. Geng, “The short-term repeatability of subdermal electrical stimulation for sensory feedback,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, p. 6398363992, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984534

    2020

  76. [86]

    Inciting high fidelity tactile sensations using a single electrotactile electrode pair,

    S. Parsnejad, Y . Gtat, R. Aridi, J. W. Brascamp, and A. J. Mason, “Inciting high fidelity tactile sensations using a single electrotactile electrode pair,” in 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) . IEEE, Mar. 2019, p. 778781. [Online]. Avail...

    2019

  77. [87]

    Sensation feedback and muscle response of electrical stimulation on the upper limb skin: A case study,

    P. Shi and X. Shen, “Sensation feedback and muscle response of electrical stimulation on the upper limb skin: A case study,” in 2015 Seventh International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation . IEEE, Jun. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/1...

    2015 doi

  78. [88]

    Subjective sensation and force characteristics of electrical muscle stimulation due to waveform changes,

    T. Ishimaru and S. Saga, “Subjective sensation and force characteristics of electrical muscle stimulation due to waveform changes,” in 2022 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, Jan. 2022, p. 908913. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.110...

    2022

  79. [89]

    Whose touch is this?: Understanding the agency trade-off between user–driven touch vs. computer–driven touch,

    D. Tajima, J. Nishida, P. Lopes, and S. Kasahara, “Whose touch is this?: Understanding the agency trade-off between user–driven touch vs. computer–driven touch,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 127, Jan. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.d...

    2022 doi

  80. [90]

    Scenario-based investigation of acceptance of electric muscle stimulation,

    A. Shahu, P. Wintersberger, and F. Michahelles, “Scenario-based investigation of acceptance of electric muscle stimulation,” in Augmented Humans 2022 , ser. AHs 2022. ACM, Mar. 2022, p. 184194. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3519391. 3519416

    2022 doi

  81. [91]

    Experiencing electrical muscle stimulation,

    J. Knibbe, A. Alsmith, and K. Hornbæk, “Experiencing electrical muscle stimulation,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2018

    2018

  82. [92]

    A system for electrotactile feedback using electronic skin and flexible matrix electrodes: Experimental evaluation,

    M. Franceschi, L. Seminara, S. Dosen, M. Strbac, M. Valle, and D. Farina, “A system for electrotactile feedback using electronic skin and flexible matrix electrodes: Experimental evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 10, no. 2, p. 162172, Apr. 2017. [Online]. Availa...

    2017

  83. [93]

    Continuous transition impairs discrimination of electrotactile frequencies,

    S. Gholinezhad, S. Dosen, and J. Dideriksen, “Continuous transition impairs discrimination of electrotactile frequencies,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 753758, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2022.3208332

    2022

  84. [94]

    Electrotactile stimulation waveform modulation based on a customized portable stimulator: A pilot study,

    Y . Yang, Y . Zhou, J. Zeng, K. He, and H. Liu, “Electrotactile stimulation waveform modulation based on a customized portable stimulator: A pilot study,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, Oct. 2019, p. 18381843. [Online]. Avail...

    2019

  85. [95]

    Detecting visuo-haptic mismatches in virtual reality using the prediction error negativity of event-related brain potentials,

    L. Gehrke, S. Akman, P. Lopes, A. Chen, A. K. Singh, H.-T. Chen, C.-T. Lin, and K. Gramann, “Detecting visuo-haptic mismatches in virtual reality using the prediction error negativity of event-related brain potentials,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factor...

    2019

  86. [96]

    A comparison of vibrotactile feedback and electrical muscle stimulation (ems) for motor response during active hand movement,

    G. Korres, W. Park, and M. Eid, “A comparison of vibrotactile feedback and electrical muscle stimulation (ems) for motor response during active hand movement,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2022

    2022

  87. [97]

    Electrotactile and vibrotactile feedback enable similar performance in psychometric tests and closed-loop control,

    J. Dideriksen, M. Markovic, S. Lemling, D. Farina, and S. Dosen, “Electrotactile and vibrotactile feedback enable similar performance in psychometric tests and closed-loop control,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 222231, Jan. 2022. [Online]. Available: http:/...

    2022

  88. [98]

    Let me grab this: a comparison of ems and vibration for haptic feedback in free-hand interaction,

    M. Pfeiffer, S. Schneegass, F. Alt, and M. Rohs, “Let me grab this: a comparison of ems and vibration for haptic feedback in free-hand interaction,” in Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference , ser. AH 14. ACM, Mar. 2014, p. 18. [Online]. Available: htt...

    2014

  89. [99]

    Hyvehybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulationis an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback,

    M. DrAlonzo, S. Dosen, C. Cipriani, and D. Farina, “Hyvehybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulationis an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 7, no. 2, p. 181190, Apr. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ TOH.2013.52

    2014

  90. [100]

    Muscleio: Muscle- based input and output for casual notifications,

    T. Duente, J. Schulte, M. Pfeiffer, and M. Rohs, “Muscleio: Muscle- based input and output for casual notifications,” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2018

    2018

  91. [101]

    Force control on fingertip using ems to maintain light touch,

    M. Shindo, T. Isezaki, R. Aoki, and Y . Koike, “Force control on fingertip using ems to maintain light touch,” in 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) . IEEE, Nov. 2021, p. 46414644. [Online]. Available: htt...

    2021

  92. [102]

    3d virtual hand pointing with ems and vibration feedback,

    M. Pfeiffer and W. Stuerzlinger, “3d virtual hand pointing with ems and vibration feedback,” in 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, Mar. 2015, p. 117120. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131735

    2015

  93. [103]

    Task-dependent adaptations in closed-loop motor control based on electrotactile feedback,

    J. L. Dideriksen, I. U. Mercader, and S. Dosen, “Task-dependent adaptations in closed-loop motor control based on electrotactile feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems , vol. 52, no. 6, p. 12271235, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/THMS...

    2022

  94. [105]

    Proprioceptive interaction,

    P. Lopes, A. Ion, W. Mueller, D. Hoffmann, P. Jonell, and P. Baudisch, “Proprioceptive interaction,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 15. ACM, Apr. 2015, p. 939948. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/...

    2015

  95. [106]

    Fused spectatorship: Designing bodily experiences where spectators become players,

    R. Patibanda, A. Saini, N. Overdevest, M. F. Montoya, X. Li, Y . Chen, S. Nisal, J. Andres, J. Knibbe, E. van den Hoven, and F. . Mueller, “Fused spectatorship: Designing bodily experiences where spectators become players,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,...

    2023 doi

  96. [107]

    Muscle- plotter: An interactive system based on electrical muscle stimulation that produces spatial output,

    P. Lopes, D. Yksel, F. Guimbretire, and P. Baudisch, “Muscle- plotter: An interactive system based on electrical muscle stimulation that produces spatial output,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual 22 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , ser. UIST 16. ACM, Oct....

    2016

  97. [108]

    Assisting with fingertip force control by active bio-acoustic sensing and electrical muscle stimulation,

    A. Niijima and Y . Kubo, “Assisting with fingertip force control by active bio-acoustic sensing and electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI 23. ACM, Apr. 2023, p. 113. [Online]. Available: http:/...

    2023

  98. [109]

    Method of electrical muscle stimulation to improve hand-eye coordination training in gaming,

    S. Zhou and N. Segawa, “Method of electrical muscle stimulation to improve hand-eye coordination training in gaming,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , vol. 8, no. CHI PLAY , p. 120, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3677088

    2024 doi

  99. [110]

    Shared bodily fusion: Leveraging inter-body electrical muscle stimulation for social play,

    R. Patibanda, N. Overdevest, S. Nisal, A. Saini, D. S. Elvitigala, J. Knibbe, E. Van Den Hoven, and F. . Mueller, “Shared bodily fusion: Leveraging inter-body electrical muscle stimulation for social play,” in Designing Interactive Systems Conference , ser. DIS 24. ACM, Jul. 2...

    2024

  100. [111]

    Auto-paizo games: Towards understanding the design of games that aim to unify a players physical body and the virtual world,

    R. Patibanda, C. Hill, A. Saini, X. Li, Y . Chen, A. Matviienko, J. Knibbe, E. van den Hoven, and F. . Mueller, “Auto-paizo games: Towards understanding the design of games that aim to unify a players physical body and the virtual world,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Comput...

    2023 doi

  101. [112]

    Reawristic: Remote touch sensation to fingers from a wristband via visually augmented electro-tactile feedback,

    Y . Tanaka, N. Weiss, R. C. Bolger-Cruz, J. Hartcher-OBrien, B. Flynn, R. Boldu, and N. Colonnese, “Reawristic: Remote touch sensation to fingers from a wristband via visually augmented electro-tactile feedback,” in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Real...

    2024

  102. [113]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174020

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174020

  103. [114]

    Colorful electrotactile feedback on the wrist,

    T. Duente, J. Schulte, M. Lucius, and M. Rohs, “Colorful electrotactile feedback on the wrist,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 2023, pp. 172–184

    2023

  104. [115]

    Full-hand electro-tactile feedback without obstructing palmar side of hand,

    Y . Tanaka, A. Shen, A. Kong, and P. Lopes, “Full-hand electro-tactile feedback without obstructing palmar side of hand,” in Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI 23. ACM, Apr. 2023, p. 115. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.or...

    2023

  105. [116]

    Multimodal haptic feedback for virtual collisions combining vibrotactile and electrical muscle stimulation,

    J. Lee and S. Choi, “Multimodal haptic feedback for virtual collisions combining vibrotactile and electrical muscle stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 17, no. 1, p. 3338, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2024.3354268

    2024

  106. [117]

    Can a smartwatch move your fingers? compact and practical electrical muscle stimulation in a smartwatch,

    A. Takahashi, Y . Tanaka, A. Tamhane, A. Shen, S.-Y . Teng, and P. Lopes, “Can a smartwatch move your fingers? compact and practical electrical muscle stimulation in a smartwatch,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ser. ...

    2024

  107. [119]

    Encoding of tactile information in hand via skin-integrated wireless haptic interface,

    K. Yao, J. Zhou, Q. Huang, M. Wu, C. K. Yiu, J. Li, X. Huang, D. Li, J. Su, S. Hou, Y . Liu, Y . Huang, Z. Tian, J. Li, H. Li, R. Shi, B. Zhang, J. Zhu, T. H. Wong, H. Jia, Z. Gao, Y . Gao, Y . Zhou, W. Park, E. Song, M. Han, H. Zhang, J. Yu, L. Wang, W. J. Li, and X. Yu, “Enc...

    2022 doi

  108. [120]

    A skin-integrated multimodal haptic interface for immersive tactile feedback,

    Y . Huang, J. Zhou, P. Ke, X. Guo, C. K. Yiu, K. Yao, S. Cai, D. Li, Y . Zhou, J. Li, T. H. Wong, Y . Liu, L. Li, Y . Gao, X. Huang, H. Li, J. Li, B. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Zheng, X. Yang, H. Gao, Z. Zhao, X. Guo, E. Song, H. Wu, Z. Wang, Z. Xie, K. Zhu, and X. Yu, “A skin-integra...

    2023 doi

  109. [121]

    Tactilewear: A comparison of electrotactile and vibrotactile feedback on the wrist and ring finger,

    D. Stanke, T. Duente, and M. Rohs, “Tactilewear: A comparison of electrotactile and vibrotactile feedback on the wrist and ring finger,” in Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human- Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society , ser. NordiCHI 20. ACM, O...

    2020

  110. [122]

    First steps towards designing electrotactons: investigating intensity and pulse frequency as parameters for electrotactile cues,

    Y . Alotaibi, J. H. Williamson, and S. A. Brewster, “First steps towards designing electrotactons: investigating intensity and pulse frequency as parameters for electrotactile cues,” in Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2022, pp. 1–11

    2022

  111. [123]

    Super-resolution wearable electrotactile rendering system,

    W. Lin, D. Zhang, W. W. Lee, X. Li, Y . Hong, Q. Pan, R. Zhang, G. Peng, H. Z. Tan, Z. Zhang, L. Wei, and Z. Yang, “Super-resolution wearable electrotactile rendering system,” Science Advances , vol. 8, no. 36, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp8738

    2022 doi

  112. [124]

    Investigating electrotactile feedback on the hand,

    Y . Alotaibi, J. H. Williamson, and S. Brewster, “Investigating electrotactile feedback on the hand,” in 2020 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS). IEEE, Mar. 2020, p. 637642. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/HAPTICS45997.2020.ras.HAP20.13.8ee5dc37

    2020

  113. [125]

    Tactex: A textile interface with seamlessly- integrated electrodes for high-resolution electrotactile stimulation,

    H. Lin, X. Liu, S. Jiang, Q. Wang, Y . Tao, G. Wang, W. Sun, T. Han, and F. Tian, “Tactex: A textile interface with seamlessly- integrated electrodes for high-resolution electrotactile stimulation,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, se...

    2024

  114. [126]

    Electro-tactile cues for a haptic multimedia finger motoric learning system,

    D. S. Pamungkas and A. Turnip, “Electro-tactile cues for a haptic multimedia finger motoric learning system,” in 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (IC- SECC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 127–132

    2019

  115. [127]

    Tactlets: Adding tactile feedback to 3d objects using custom printed controls,

    D. Groeger, M. Feick, A. Withana, and J. Steimle, “Tactlets: Adding tactile feedback to 3d objects using custom printed controls,” in Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology , 2019, pp. 923–936

    2019

  116. [128]

    Novel electrode designs for electrotactile stimulation of the finger: A comparative assessment,

    M. A. Garenfeld, M. C. Henrich, M. Isakovi, J. Maleevi, M. trbac, and S. Doen, “Novel electrode designs for electrotactile stimulation of the finger: A comparative assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 748759, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.d...

    2023

  117. [129]

    Immersive teleoperation of a robot arm using electro-tactile feedback,

    D. Pamungkas and K. Ward, “Immersive teleoperation of a robot arm using electro-tactile feedback,” in 2015 6th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA). IEEE, Feb. 2015, p. 300305. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICARA.2015. 7081164

    2015 doi

  118. [130]

    Tactile perception modulation by tran- scutaneous electrical stimulation,

    H. An, J. Seul, and H.-C. Shin, “Tactile perception modulation by tran- scutaneous electrical stimulation,” in 2021 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 833–836

    2021

  119. [131]

    Development of an electrical stimulator system for tactile temporal and spatial study,

    J. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Shi, D. Suo, T. Yan, Z. Zhang, and J. Wu, “Development of an electrical stimulator system for tactile temporal and spatial study,” in 2022 16th ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME) . IEEE, Nov. 2022, p. 290293. [Online]. Ava...

    2022

  120. [132]

    Material roughness modulation via electrotactile augmentation,

    S. Yoshimoto, Y . Kuroda, M. Imura, and O. Oshiro, “Material roughness modulation via electrotactile augmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 8, no. 2, p. 199208, Apr. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015.2412942

    2015

  121. [133]

    Extedge: Haptic augmentation of visual experiences of a smartphone by electro- tactile sensation through the edges,

    T. Takami, T. Saito, T. Kameoka, and H. Kajimoto, “Extedge: Haptic augmentation of visual experiences of a smartphone by electro- tactile sensation through the edges,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, ser. SUI 23. ACM, Oct. 2023, p. 18. [On...

    2023

  122. [134]

    A lightweight electrotactile feedback device for grasp improvement in immersive virtual environments,

    J. Hummel, J. Dodiya, G. A. Center, L. Eckardt, R. Wolff, A. Gerndt, and T. W. Kuhlen, “A lightweight electrotactile feedback device for grasp improvement in immersive virtual environments,” in 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) . IEEE, Mar. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.do...

    2016

  123. [135]

    The impact of size and position of reference electrode on the localization of biphasic electrotactile stimulation on the fingertips,

    M. Isakovic, J. Malesevic, M. Kostic, S. Dosen, and M. Strbac, “The impact of size and position of reference electrode on the localization of biphasic electrotactile stimulation on the fingertips,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 15, no. 2, p. 255266, Apr. 2022. [Online]. ...

    2022

  124. [136]

    Double-sided tactile interactions for grasping in virtual reality,

    A. Jingu, A. Withana, and J. Steimle, “Double-sided tactile interactions for grasping in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , ser. UIST 23. ACM, Oct. 2023, p. 111. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/1...

    2023

  125. [137]

    Comparative evaluation of tactile sensation by electrical and mechanical stimulation,

    V . Yem and H. Kajimoto, “Comparative evaluation of tactile sensation by electrical and mechanical stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 130134, Jan. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2016.2605084

    2017

  126. [138]

    Tacttoo: A thin and feel-through tattoo for on-skin tactile output,

    A. Withana, D. Groeger, and J. Steimle, “Tacttoo: A thin and feel-through tattoo for on-skin tactile output,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ser. UIST 18. ACM, Oct. 2018, p. 365378. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi....

    2018

  127. [139]

    Haptic permeability: Adding holes to tactile devices improves dexterity,

    S.-Y . Teng, A. Gupta, and P. Lopes, “Haptic permeability: Adding holes to tactile devices improves dexterity,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 24. ACM, May 2024, p. 112. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/36139...

    2024

  128. [140]

    Design and evaluation of electrotactile rendering effects for finger- based interactions in virtual reality,

    S. Vizcay, P. Kourtesis, F. Argelaguet, C. Pacchierotti, and M. Marchal, “Design and evaluation of electrotactile rendering effects for finger- based interactions in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology , ser. VR...

    2022

  129. [141]

    Shaping compliance: Inducing haptic illusion of compliance in different shapes with electrotactile grains,

    A. Jingu, N. Sabnis, P. Strohmeier, and J. Steimle, “Shaping compliance: Inducing haptic illusion of compliance in different shapes with electrotactile grains,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI 24. ACM, May 2024, p. 113. [Onl...

    2024

  130. [142]

    Explore electrotactile parametric properties using an electrical stimulation system,

    Z. Zhou, Y . Yang, J. Zeng, X. Wang, and H. Liu, “Explore electrotactile parametric properties using an electrical stimulation system,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 22, no. 7, p. 70537062, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3152185

    2022

  131. [143]

    Interaction of perceived frequency and intensity in fingertip electrotactile stimulation: Dissimilarity ratings and multidimensional scaling,

    K. A. Kaczmarek, M. E. Tyler, U. O. Okpara, and S. J. Haase, “Interaction of perceived frequency and intensity in fingertip electrotactile stimulation: Dissimilarity ratings and multidimensional scaling,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol....

    2017

  132. [144]

    Non-linearity of skin properties in electrotactile applications: Identification and mitigation,

    M. Rahimi, F. Jiang, and Y . Shen, “Non-linearity of skin properties in electrotactile applications: Identification and mitigation,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, p. 169844169852, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2955648

    2019

  133. [145]

    A braille reading system based on electrotactile display with flexible electrode array,

    Z. Zhou, Y . Yang, and H. Liu, “A braille reading system based on electrotactile display with flexible electrode array,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica , vol. 9, no. 4, p. 735737, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.105476

    2022

  134. [146]

    Dynamic spatiotemporal pattern identification and analysis using a fingertip-based electro- tactile display array,

    M. Rahimi, F. Jiang, C. Ye, and Y . Shen, “Dynamic spatiotemporal pattern identification and analysis using a fingertip-based electro- tactile display array,” in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, Nov. 2019, p. 81328137. [On...

    2019

  135. [147]

    Presentation of finger- size shapes by combining force feedback and electro-tactile stimulation,

    Y . Suga, I. Mizoguchi, and H. Kajimoto, “Presentation of finger- size shapes by combining force feedback and electro-tactile stimulation,” in 2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) . IEEE, Mar. 2024, p. 590597. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/...

    2024

  136. [148]

    3d shape presentation by combination of force feedback and electro- tactile stimulation,

    Y . Suga, M. Miyakami, I. Mizoguchi, and H. Kajimoto, “3d shape presentation by combination of force feedback and electro- tactile stimulation,” in 2023 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, Jul. 2023, p. 361367. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/WHC56415.20...

    2023

  137. [149]

    Adaptive spatial mapping of electro- tactile threshold based on subdivision bio-impedance feedback,

    M. Rahimi and Y . Shen, “Adaptive spatial mapping of electro- tactile threshold based on subdivision bio-impedance feedback,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR). IEEE, Aug. 2019, p. 164169. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10...

    2019

  138. [150]

    Exploring the role of electro-tactile and kinesthetic feedback in telemanipulation task,

    D. Trinitatova, M. Altamirano Cabrera, P. Ponomareva, A. Fedoseev, and D. Tsetserukou, “Exploring the role of electro-tactile and kinesthetic feedback in telemanipulation task,” in 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, Aug....

    2022

  139. [151]

    Designing unobtrusive modulated electrotactile feedback on fingertip edge to assist blind and low vision (blv) people in comprehending charts,

    C. Jiang, Y . Fan, J. Xie, E. Kuang, K. Zhang, and M. Fan, “Designing unobtrusive modulated electrotactile feedback on fingertip edge to assist blind and low vision (blv) people in comprehending charts,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System...

    2024

  140. [152]

    Action-specific perception & performance on a fittss law task in virtual reality: The role of haptic feedback,

    P. Kourtesis, S. Vizcay, M. Marchal, C. Pacchierotti, and F. Argelaguet, “Action-specific perception & performance on a fittss law task in virtual reality: The role of haptic feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , vol. 28, no. 11, p. 37153726...

    2022

  141. [153]

    Opto- electrotactile feedback enabled text-line tracking control for a finger-wearable reading aid for the blind,

    M. Rahimi, Y . Shen, C. Peng, Z. Liu, and F. Jiang, “Opto- electrotactile feedback enabled text-line tracking control for a finger-wearable reading aid for the blind,” in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, May 2022, p. 70077013. [Online]. A...

    2022

  142. [154]

    Electrotactile augmentation for carving guidance,

    S. Yoshimoto, Y . Kuroda, M. Imura, O. Oshiro, K. Nozaki, Y . Taga, H. Machi, and H. Tamagawa, “Electrotactile augmentation for carving guidance,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4353, Jan. 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015. 2479229

    2016 doi

  143. [155]

    Exploring perceptual intensity properties using electrotactile stimulation on fingertips,

    Z. Zhou, X. Wang, Y . Yang, J. Zeng, and H. Liu, “Exploring perceptual intensity properties using electrotactile stimulation on fingertips,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics , vol. 16, no. 4, p. 805815, Oct. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2023.3327765

    2023

  144. [156]

    Ergopulse: Electrifying your lower body with biomechanical simulation-based electrical muscle stimulation haptic system in virtual reality,

    S. Hwang, J. Oh, S. Kang, M. Seong, A. I. A. M. Elsharkawy, and S. Kim, “Ergopulse: Electrifying your lower body with biomechanical simulation-based electrical muscle stimulation haptic system in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Comput...

    2024

  145. [157]

    Evaluating distinct sensations by modulating high-frequency electrotactile pulses for unobtrusive communication with iot devices,

    S. Parsnejad, S. Davila-Montero, and A. J. Mason, “Evaluating distinct sensations by modulating high-frequency electrotactile pulses for unobtrusive communication with iot devices,” in 2020 IEEE 6th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) . IEEE, Jun. 2020, p

    2020

  146. [158]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT48130.2020

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WF-IoT48130.2020. 9221040

    2020

  147. [159]

    Around the (virtual) world: Infinite walking in virtual reality using electrical muscle stimulation,

    J. Auda, M. Pascher, and S. Schneegass, “Around the (virtual) world: Infinite walking in virtual reality using electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 19. ACM, May 2019. [Online]. Available: htt...

    2019

  148. [160]

    Feetthrough: Electrotactile foot interface that preserves real-world sensations,

    K. Ushiyama and P. Lopes, “Feetthrough: Electrotactile foot interface that preserves real-world sensations,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology , ser. UIST 23. ACM, Oct. 2023, p. 111. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org...

    2023

  149. [161]

    Use of high- frequency pulses to generate unique electrotactile sensations for real-time feedback in wearable sensory systems,

    S. Parsnejad, S. Dvila-Montero, and A. J. Mason, “Use of high- frequency pulses to generate unique electrotactile sensations for real-time feedback in wearable sensory systems,” in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) . IEEE, Oct. 2020, p. 15. [Onl...

    2020

  150. [162]

    Legsense: Inducing walking sensation in seated vr by providing movement illusion via electrical muscle stimulation,

    J. Um, E. Jeon, Y . Kang, S. Kang, A. Elsharkawy, J. DelPreto, W. Matusik, D. Rus, and S. Kim, “Legsense: Inducing walking sensation in seated vr by providing movement illusion via electrical muscle stimulation,” in Companion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference o...

    2024

  151. [163]

    Cruise control for pedestrians: Controlling walking direction using electrical muscle stimulation,

    M. Pfeiffer, T. Dnte, S. Schneegass, F. Alt, and M. Rohs, “Cruise control for pedestrians: Controlling walking direction using electrical muscle stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ser. CHI 15. ACM, Apr. 2015, ...

    2015

  152. [164]

    Steinicke, Being really virtual

    F. Steinicke, Being really virtual . Springer, 2016

    2016

  153. [165]

    Two-point discrimination distances in the normal hand and forearm,

    M. CELLIS and R. POOL, “Two-point discrimination distances in the normal hand and forearm,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 1977

    1977

  154. [167]

    Investigating distinct intensity levels in electrotactile machine-to- human communication,

    S. Parsnejad, S. Davila-Montero, E. Ashoori, and A. J. Mason, “Investigating distinct intensity levels in electrotactile machine-to- human communication,” in 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, May 2022, p. 200204. [Online]. Available: http...

    2022

  155. [168]

    Understanding user acceptance of electrical muscle stimulation in human-computer interaction,

    S. Faltaous, J. R. Williamson, M. Koelle, M. Pfeiffer, J. Keppel, and S. Schneegass, “Understanding user acceptance of electrical muscle stimulation in human-computer interaction,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2024, pp. 1–16

    2024

  156. [2015]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807443

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807443

  157. [2021]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe2943

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe2943

    doi

  158. [2023]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3610925

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3610925

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.