pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17207 · v1 · pith:77Q7QR6Xnew · submitted 2026-06-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Wildly Oscillating Stars -- Unexplained dense ridge-like frequency agglomerations in A and F type pulsators

V. Antoci , J. Labadie-Bartz , M. Swiech , O. Deurfeldt-Pedros , S.J. Murphy , D.W. Kurtz , T.R. Bedding , G. Handler
show 9 more authors
J. Fuller R.-M. Ouazzani H. Kjeldsen L. Fellay M. Gade Pedersen E. Niemczura D.M. Bowman M. Deal P. Mani
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords wildly oscillating starsfrequency agglomerationsdelta Scuti starsgamma Doradus starspulsation modesKepler dataTESS datastellar oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dense ridge-like frequency clusters appear in A and F stars only near the delta Sct and gamma Dor overlap and are not reproduced by existing pulsation models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates dense, ridge-like frequency agglomerations observed in a subset of A and F type pulsating stars, called wildly oscillating stars. These clusters sit in a confined intermediate-frequency band below the fundamental radial mode and occur only in a narrow region of stellar parameter space. Standard explanations such as asymptotic g-mode patterns, low-order p modes, binarity, or rotational splitting do not reproduce the observed mode density or organised ridge structure. Non-adiabatic stability calculations match the classical instability strips but fail to predict unstable modes with the required density or morphology inside the agglomerated region.

Core claim

The WOS consist of dense ridge-like frequency agglomerations confined to a narrow region near the overlap of the delta Sct and gamma Dor instability strips. These cannot be reproduced by asymptotic g-mode behaviour, low-order p modes, binarity, or typical rotational splitting. In at least two stars a significant fraction of peaks can be explained as nonlinear combination frequencies, but this requires parent modes located inside the agglomerated band itself. Non-adiabatic stability calculations reproduce the classical instability domains yet do not predict unstable modes with the observed density or organised ridge structure, indicating that the WOS represent a pulsational regime not capture

What carries the argument

The agglomerated frequency regions, which are dense ridge-like clusters of peaks occupying a confined intermediate-frequency band below the fundamental radial mode.

If this is right

  • The WOS phenomenon is restricted to a narrow region of stellar parameter space near the delta Sct and gamma Dor overlap.
  • A mechanism is required that selects or excites modes in a confined intermediate-frequency band and organises them into ridges.
  • Some observed peaks arise as combinations of parent modes that must themselves lie inside the agglomerated region.
  • Current models of mode excitation and stability must be extended to account for this organised structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The confinement to a narrow parameter window may indicate a critical dependence on a specific combination of effective temperature, rotation, or evolutionary state.
  • Higher-precision photometry could test whether the ridges correspond to families of modes with a common spacing or geometry.
  • If the parent modes required for combinations are confirmed, the phenomenon supplies a direct probe of nonlinear coupling in this frequency range.

Load-bearing premise

Non-adiabatic stability calculations are assumed to predict all possible unstable modes, and the observed frequencies are assumed to be intrinsic stellar pulsations rather than residual instrumental effects or untested nonlinear processes.

What would settle it

A non-adiabatic calculation that produces unstable modes with the observed density and ridge morphology inside the intermediate-frequency band, or the detection of similar ridges in stars well outside the narrow overlap region of the two instability strips.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17207 by D.M. Bowman, D.W. Kurtz, E. Niemczura, G. Handler, H. Kjeldsen, J. Fuller, J. Labadie-Bartz, L. Fellay, M. Deal, M. Gade Pedersen, M. Swiech, O. Deurfeldt-Pedros, P. Mani, R.-M. Ouazzani, S.J. Murphy, T.R. Bedding, V. Antoci.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Upper panel: Amplitude spectrum of KIC 5443410, an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper panel: Amplitude spectrum of KIC 6875337, rep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Amplitude amplitude spectra of the type I stars. The region of agglomerated peaks is shaded in each panel, and predicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as Fig. 3, but for the type II stars. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams from our MESA model grid for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Period spacing patterns of g modes for three stars in our sample. The upper panels show a portion of the photometric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Upper panel: Échelle diagram for KIC 5443410 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Upper panel: Échelle diagram for KIC 6875337 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Upper panel: Échelle diagram for KIC 8460993 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Amplitude and phase variability for KIC 5443410. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Band-pass filtered, phase-folded Kepler light curves of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Amplitude and phase variability for KIC 6595315. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Phase-folded Kepler light curves of KIC 7900367 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Amplitude and phase variability for KIC 7900367. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Kepler light curves of KIC 7430757 phase-folded to a period of 5.1680 d in four consecutive time segments (MBJD ranges indicated in each panel), each binned into 200 phase bins. Each panel reveals clear, stable orbital or rotational modulation, indicating that some of the peaks are multiplets of the rotation frequency. To investigate the nature of the modulation, we applied the same phase-binned amplitude… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Amplitude and phase variability for KIC 8299332. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Amplitude and phase variability for KIC 10014548. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Hertzsprung–Russell diagram showing the distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Upper panel: échelle diagram for ℓ = 4 multiplet split by rotation. Lower panel: Corresponding amplitude spectrum with the ℓ = 4 multiplet and the corresponding harmonics and com￾bination frequencies. sation code (Dupret 2001; Dupret et al. 2002, 2005) in order to assess whether the observed agglomerated frequency regions in our stars can be reproduced theoretically. The MAD code includes a time-dependent… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Evolution of the frequencies of the ℓ = 2 modes as a function of the effective temperature for the 1.55 M⊙ star along its evolution. Orange dots indicate unstable modes, while grey dots correspond to stable modes. To summarise, the combined observational and theoreti￾cal constraints indicate that the agglomerated frequency phe￾nomenon requires a mechanism that (i) operates within a narrow region of stella… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the origin of the dense, ridge-like frequency clusters observed in a subset of A and F type pulsating stars, which we refer to as `wildly oscillating' stars (WOS). These agglomerated frequency regions occupy a confined part of the frequency spectrum, typically below the fundamental radial mode, and are not explained by pulsation theory. We analyse Kepler and TESS data, construct echelle diagrams, and perform searches for combination frequencies. We determine the fundamental radial mode in order to place the agglomerated regions in a seismic context. Rotational modulation is examined through phase-folded light curves and amplitude-phase analysis, and binarity and geometric modulation scenarios are tested. The WOS phenomenon is confined to a narrow region near the overlap of the delta Sct and gamma Dor instability strips. The observed ridge morphology and mode density cannot be reproduced by simple asymptotic g-mode behaviour, low-order p modes, binarity, or typical rotational splitting. In at least two stars, a significant fraction of peaks in the agglomerated region can be explained as nonlinear combination frequencies involving high-order g modes. However, these combinations require parent modes located within the agglomerated frequency band itself, indicating that intrinsic pulsation modes must be present there. Non-adiabatic stability calculations reproduce the classical instability domains but do not predict unstable modes with the observed density or organised ridge structure in the agglomerated region. The WOS appear to represent a pulsational regime not captured by current models of mode excitation or rotational modulation. The agglomerated frequency phenomenon requires a mechanism that selects or excites a confined intermediate-frequency band and produces organised ridge structures within a narrow region of stellar parameter space (abridged for arXiv).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a subset of A/F-type pulsators exhibit dense ridge-like frequency agglomerations (termed WOS) below the fundamental radial mode that cannot be explained by standard pulsation theory, rotational splitting, binarity, or asymptotic g-mode behaviour. Analysis of Kepler/TESS light curves, echelle diagrams, combination-frequency searches, and non-adiabatic stability calculations shows the phenomenon is confined to a narrow region near the δ Sct/γ Dor overlap; in at least two stars the agglomerated peaks include nonlinear combinations whose parents must lie inside the same band, implying intrinsic modes not predicted by current models.

Significance. If the central observational claim holds, the work identifies a previously unrecognised pulsational regime whose mode density and ridge organisation are not reproduced by existing non-adiabatic calculations or simple geometric/rotational effects. The requirement that parent modes reside inside the agglomerated band supplies a direct falsifiable test for any proposed excitation mechanism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Combination frequency search] Combination-frequency search (abstract and associated methods): the statement that 'a significant fraction of peaks ... can be explained as nonlinear combination frequencies' is load-bearing for the claim that intrinsic modes must exist inside the agglomerated band, yet no amplitude threshold, frequency-resolution criterion, or false-alarm probability is reported for the search completeness.
  2. [Non-adiabatic stability calculations] Non-adiabatic stability calculations (abstract): the assertion that these calculations 'reproduce the classical instability domains but do not predict unstable modes with the observed density or organised ridge structure' is central to the conclusion that current models fail; however, the convection treatment, the frequency range explicitly searched, and any test for missed intermediate-frequency modes are not specified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The parenthetical '(abridged for arXiv)' should be removed from the abstract in the manuscript version.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The two major comments identify important methodological details that were insufficiently specified in the original manuscript. We address each point below and will revise the text accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Combination frequency search] Combination-frequency search (abstract and associated methods): the statement that 'a significant fraction of peaks ... can be explained as nonlinear combination frequencies' is load-bearing for the claim that intrinsic modes must exist inside the agglomerated band, yet no amplitude threshold, frequency-resolution criterion, or false-alarm probability is reported for the search completeness.

    Authors: We agree that explicit search criteria are required to support the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add the following details to the methods section: (i) amplitude threshold of 4 times the local noise level in the periodogram, (ii) frequency match within 1.5 times the Rayleigh resolution, and (iii) false-alarm probability < 0.001 based on the analytic expression of Horne & Baliunas (1986). These criteria will be applied uniformly to the two stars discussed and the results tabulated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Non-adiabatic stability calculations] Non-adiabatic stability calculations (abstract): the assertion that these calculations 'reproduce the classical instability domains but do not predict unstable modes with the observed density or organised ridge structure' is central to the conclusion that current models fail; however, the convection treatment, the frequency range explicitly searched, and any test for missed intermediate-frequency modes are not specified.

    Authors: We accept that these computational details must be stated. The revised version will specify: convection treatment via mixing-length theory with α = 1.8 and no overshooting; frequency search performed from 0.05 d⁻¹ to 120 d⁻¹; and verification that all computed modes in the intermediate-frequency range (0.5–20 d⁻¹) were examined, with no additional unstable modes found that could account for the observed ridge density. These parameters will be added to the methods and figure captions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational comparison to external models

full rationale

The paper is an observational study that identifies frequency agglomerations in Kepler/TESS light curves of A/F stars, places them relative to the radial fundamental mode, searches for combination frequencies, and directly compares the observed ridge structures and mode densities against published non-adiabatic stability calculations. No derivation, equation, or parameter fit is introduced whose output is then relabeled as a prediction; the central claim that models fail to reproduce the phenomenon follows from the mismatch between observed frequencies and the instability domains already computed by independent codes. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and no renaming of known results occurs. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of photometry and existing pulsation models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the reliability of space photometry for frequency detection and on the completeness of existing non-adiabatic pulsation models. No free parameters are introduced or fitted in the reported analysis.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Kepler and TESS time-series photometry accurately recovers stellar pulsation frequencies without dominant instrumental artifacts in the analyzed targets.
    The entire frequency analysis depends on this assumption about the input data quality.
  • domain assumption Current non-adiabatic stability calculations capture the full set of linearly unstable modes in the relevant stellar parameter space.
    Used to conclude that the observed ridge density is not predicted by standard theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5931 in / 1448 out tokens · 66328 ms · 2026-06-27T02:27:43.346657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Abt, H. A. & Moyd, K. I. 1973, ApJ, 182, 809

    1973

  2. [2]

    G., García, A., Robertson, R

    Adelberger, E. G., García, A., Robertson, R. G. H., et al. 2011, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 83, 195

    2011

  3. [3]

    2025, A&A, 696, A111

    Antoci, V ., Cantiello, M., Khalack, V ., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A111

    2025

  4. [4]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 118

    Antoci, V ., Cunha, M., Houdek, G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 118

    2014

  5. [5]

    S., Bowman, D

    Antoci, V ., Cunha, M. S., Bowman, D. M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4040

    2019

  6. [6]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481

    2009

  7. [7]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

    2021

  8. [8]

    Balona, L. A. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 119

    1994

  9. [9]

    A., Krisciunas, K., & Cousins, A

    Balona, L. A., Krisciunas, K., & Cousins, A. W. J. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 905

    1994

  10. [10]

    R., Murphy, S

    Barac, N., Bedding, T. R., Murphy, S. J., & Hey, D. R. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2080

    2022

  11. [11]

    R., Murphy, S

    Bedding, T. R., Murphy, S. J., Crawford, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, L10

    2023

  12. [12]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 128

    Berry, I., Huber, D., Li, Y ., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 128

    2025

  13. [13]

    & Dziembowski, W

    Bigot, L. & Dziembowski, W. A. 2002, A&A, 391, 235

    2002

  14. [14]

    2013, MNRAS, 429, 2500

    Bouabid, M.-P., Dupret, M.-A., Salmon, S., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2500

    2013

  15. [15]

    Bowman, D. M. & Kurtz, D. W. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3169

    2018

  16. [16]

    2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Breger, M. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. Montgomery, 3

    2000

  17. [17]

    1999, A&A, 349, 225

    Breger, M., Handler, G., Garrido, R., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 225

    1999

  18. [18]

    1993, A&A, 271, 482

    Breger, M., Stich, J., Garrido, R., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 482

    1993

  19. [19]

    M., Latham, D

    Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., Everett, M. E., & Esquerdo, G. A. 2011, AJ, 142, 112

    2011

  20. [20]

    M., Antoci, V ., & Salmon, S

    Christophe, S., Ballot, J., Ouazzani, R. M., Antoci, V ., & Salmon, S. J. A. J. 2018, A&A, 618, A47

    2018

  21. [21]

    Cox, J. P. & Giuli, R. T. 1968, Principles of stellar structure

    1968

  22. [22]

    M., Still, M., Schellart, P., et al

    Crawford, S. M., Still, M., Schellart, P., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III, ed. D. R. Silva, A. B. Peck, & B. T. Soifer, 773725

    2010

  23. [23]

    L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al

    Creevey, O. L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A26

    2023

  24. [24]

    S., Antoci, V ., Holdsworth, D

    Cunha, M. S., Antoci, V ., Holdsworth, D. L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3523 Daszy´nska-Daszkiewicz, J., Dziembowski, W. A., Pamyatnykh, A. A., & Goupil, M.-J. 2002, A&A, 392, 151

    2019

  25. [25]

    2016, A&A, 589, A140

    Deal, M., Richard, O., & Vauclair, S. 2016, A&A, 589, A140

    2016

  26. [26]

    Dupret, M. A. 2001, A&A, 366, 166

    2001

  27. [27]

    A., De Ridder, J., Neuforge, C., Aerts, C., & Scuflaire, R

    Dupret, M. A., De Ridder, J., Neuforge, C., Aerts, C., & Scuflaire, R. 2002, A&A, 385, 563

    2002

  28. [28]

    A., Grigahcène, A., Garrido, R., Gabriel, M., & Scuflaire, R

    Dupret, M. A., Grigahcène, A., Garrido, R., Gabriel, M., & Scuflaire, R. 2005, A&A, 435, 927

    2005

  29. [29]

    2004, A&A, 414, L17 Dürfeldt-Pedros, O., Antoci, V ., Lecoanet, D., Guo, Z., & Labadie-Bartz, J

    Dupret, M.-A., Grigahcène, A., Garrido, R., Gabriel, M., & Scuflaire, R. 2004, A&A, 414, L17 Dürfeldt-Pedros, O., Antoci, V ., Lecoanet, D., Guo, Z., & Labadie-Bartz, J. 2026, A&A, arXiv:2606.12148 Dürfeldt-Pedros, O., Antoci, V ., Smalley, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    1977, Acta Astron., 27, 203

    Dziembowski, W. 1977, Acta Astron., 27, 203

    1977

  31. [31]

    Dziembowski, W. A. 2016, Commmunications of the Konkoly Observatory Hun- gary, 105, 23

    2016

  32. [32]

    2024, New A Rev., 98, 101694

    El-Badry, K. 2024, New A Rev., 98, 101694

    2024

  33. [33]

    Fitch, W. S. 1981, ApJ, 249, 218

    1981

  34. [34]

    2016, A&A, 594, A39 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A

    Frasca, A., Molenda- ˙Zakowicz, J., De Cat, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A39 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2022, Gaia Data Re- lease 3: Summary of the content and survey properties

    2016

  35. [35]

    2022, A&A, 662, A82

    Garcia, S., Van Reeth, T., De Ridder, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A82

    2022

  36. [36]

    J., & Bedding, T

    Gautam, A., Murphy, S. J., & Bedding, T. R. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.03561

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Ginestet, N., Prieur, J.-L., Carquillat, J.-M., & Griffin, R. F. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 61

    2003

  38. [38]

    Gray, R. O. & Garrison, R. F. 1989, ApJS, 70, 623

    1989

  39. [39]

    & Sauval, A

    Grevesse, N. & Sauval, A. J. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 85, 161 Grigahcène, A., Antoci, V ., Balona, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L192 Grigahcène, A., Dupret, M. A., Gabriel, M., Garrido, R., & Scuflaire, R. 2005, A&A, 434, 1055

    1998

  40. [40]

    A., Kaye, A

    Guzik, J. A., Kaye, A. B., Bradley, P. A., Cox, A. N., & Neuforge, C. 2000, ApJ, 542, L57

    2000

  41. [41]

    & Shobbrook, R

    Handler, G. & Shobbrook, R. R. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 251

    2002

  42. [42]

    Higgins, M. E. & Bell, K. J. 2023, AJ, 165, 141

    2023

  43. [43]

    L., Cunha, M

    Holdsworth, D. L., Cunha, M. S., Kurtz, D. W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 1073

    2021

  44. [44]

    L., Cunha, M

    Holdsworth, D. L., Cunha, M. S., Lares-Martiz, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9548

    2024

  45. [45]

    2008, Communications in Asteroseismology, 157, 137

    Houdek, G. 2008, Communications in Asteroseismology, 157, 137

    2008

  46. [46]

    & Dupret, M.-A

    Houdek, G. & Dupret, M.-A. 2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, 8

    2015

  47. [47]

    Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1993, ApJ, 412, 752

    1993

  48. [48]

    Iglesias, C. A. & Rogers, F. J. 1996, ApJ, 464, 943

    1996

  49. [49]

    Irwin, A. W. 2012, FreeEOS: Equation of State for stellar interiors calculations

    2012

  50. [50]

    S., Bauer, E

    Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15

    2023

  51. [51]

    M., et al

    Jordi, C., Gebran, M., Carrasco, J. M., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A48

    2010

  52. [52]

    B., Handler, G., Krisciunas, K., Poretti, E., & Zerbi, F

    Kaye, A. B., Handler, G., Krisciunas, K., Poretti, E., & Zerbi, F. M. 1999, PASP, 111, 840

    1999

  53. [53]

    G., Borucki, W

    Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79

    2010

  54. [54]

    Kurtz, D. W. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 807

    1982

  55. [55]

    Kurtz, D. W. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 31

    2022

  56. [56]

    W., Saio, H., Takata, M., et al

    Kurtz, D. W., Saio, H., Takata, M., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 102

    2014

  57. [57]

    W., Shibahashi, H., Murphy, S

    Kurtz, D. W., Shibahashi, H., Murphy, S. J., Bedding, T. R., & Bowman, D. M. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3015

    2015

  58. [58]

    Labadie-Bartz, J., Hümmerich, S., Bernhard, K., Paunzen, E., & Shultz, M. E. 2023, A&A, 676, A55

    2023

  59. [59]

    L., et al

    Lallement, R., Babusiaux, C., Vergely, J. L., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A135

    2019

  60. [60]

    M., & Van Reeth, T

    Lecoanet, D., Bowman, D. M., & Van Reeth, T. 2022, MNRAS, 512, L16

    2022

  61. [61]

    & Breger, M

    Lenz, P. & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    2005

  62. [62]

    R., et al

    Li, G., Van Reeth, T., Bedding, T. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3586 Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J. V . d. M., Hedges, C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library

    2020

  63. [63]

    Lovekin, C. C. & Guzik, J. A. 2017, ApJ, 849, 38

    2017

  64. [64]

    1985, A&A, 151, 315

    Mathys, G. 1985, A&A, 151, 315

    1985

  65. [65]

    2008, MNRAS, 386, 1487

    Miglio, A., Montalbán, J., Noels, A., & Eggenberger, P. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1487

    2008

  66. [66]

    Mombarg, J. S. G., Van Reeth, T., & Aerts, C. 2021, A&A, 650, A58

    2021

  67. [67]

    J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., & Bedding, T

    Murphy, S. J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., & Bedding, T. R. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2380

    2019

  68. [68]

    J., Moe, M., Kurtz, D

    Murphy, S. J., Moe, M., Kurtz, D. W., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4322

    2018

  69. [69]

    J., Shibahashi, H., & Kurtz, D

    Murphy, S. J., Shibahashi, H., & Kurtz, D. W. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2986 O’Connell, D. J. K. 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, 2, 85

    2013

  70. [70]

    Pamyatnykh, A. A. 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 119 Pápics, P. I. 2012, Astronomische Nachrichten, 333, 1053

    1999

  71. [71]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    2011

  72. [72]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    2013

  73. [73]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    2015

  74. [74]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34

    2018

  75. [75]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10

    2019

  76. [76]

    Pedersen, M. G. & Bell, K. J. 2023, AJ, 165, 239

    2023

  77. [77]

    A., Batten, A

    Pourbaix, D., Tokovinin, A. A., Batten, A. H., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 727

    2004

  78. [78]

    2019, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 19, 064

    Qian, S.-B., Shi, X.-D., Zhu, L.-Y ., et al. 2019, Research in Astronomy and As- trophysics, 19, 064

    2019

  79. [79]

    A., Jayaraman, R., Handler, G., et al

    Rappaport, S. A., Jayaraman, R., Handler, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.18836

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    & Manfroid, J

    Renson, P. & Manfroid, J. 2009, A&A, 498, 961

    2009

Showing first 80 references.