Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is a Finite Intersection of Balls Covered by a Finite Union of Balls in Euclidean Spaces ?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1804.06699 v2 pith:77TEBML5 submitted 2018-04-18 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords ballsintersectionfiniteproblemunionprogrammingalgorithmscovered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Considering a finite intersection of balls and a finite union of other balls in an Euclidean space, we propose an exact method to test whether the intersection is covered by the union. We reformulate this problem into quadratic programming problems. For each problem, we study the intersection between a sphere and a Voronoi-like polyhedron. That way we get information about a possible overlap between the frontier of the union and the intersection of balls. If the polyhedra are non-degenerate, the initial nonconvex geometric problem, which is NP-hard in general, is tractable in polynomial time by convex optimization tools and vertex enumeration. Under some mild conditions the vertex enumeration can be skipped. Simulations highlight the accuracy and efficiency of our approach compared with competing algorithms in Python for nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming. This work is motivated by an application in statistics to the problem of multidimensional changepoint detection using pruned dynamic programming algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools