pith. sign in

arxiv: 1106.1150 · v1 · pith:7ADKZGDYnew · submitted 2011-06-06 · 💻 cs.CC

Barbosa, Uniform Polynomial Time Bounds, and Promises

classification 💻 cs.CC
keywords barbosanotationevenproofsensedifferentliteraturemeaning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This note is a commentary on, and critique of, Andre Luiz Barbosa's paper entitled "P != NP Proof." Despite its provocative title, what the paper is seeking to do is not to prove P \neq NP in the standard sense in which that notation is used in the literature. Rather, Barbosa is (and is aware that he is) arguing that a different meaning should be associated with the notation P \neq NP, and he claims to prove the truth of the statement P \neq NP in his quite different sense of that statement. However, we note that (1) the paper fails even on its own terms, as due to a uniformity problem, the paper's proof does not establish, even in its unusual sense of the notation, that P \neq NP; and (2) what the paper means by the claim P \neq NP in fact implies that P \neq NP holds even under the standard meaning that that notation has in the literature (and so it is exceedingly unlikely that Barbosa's proof can be fixed any time soon).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.