Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 36 references

Surface plasmon polaritons with extended lifetime

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A quantum-emitter layer that creates a Fano resonance extends the lifetime of surface plasmon polaritons, boosting intensity at 5 micrometers by about 30 times and, with a silica-core design, by about 450 times.

desk verdict Fano-based SPP lifetime extension is a fresh idea, but the single-distance FDTD evidence does not yet prove the mechanism; worth a conditional peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22953 v1 pith:7BNBRXJ6 submitted 2025-05-29 physics.optics

Rasim Volga Ovali , Mehmet Emre Tasgin This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords surfaceplasmonpolaritonsFanoresonancequantumemitterlifetimeextensionpropagationdistancenanowireFDTDsimulationplasmonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a Fano resonance, created by a dense quantum-emitter layer on a gold nanowire, extends the lifetime of propagating surface plasmon polaritons. In full-wave simulations, the time-integrated electric-field intensity at a monitor $z_0=5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ from the source is about 30 times larger with the emitter layer than without it. It further claims that this factor multiplies the 15-fold enhancement already obtained with a silica core, giving a total 450-fold intensity gain. This matters because short SPP propagation distance is the main bottleneck for using nanowires as on-chip optical interconnects, and a multiplicative gain combines with other loss-reduction techniques instead of replacing them.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Fano resonance formed when the broad SPP mode of the nanowire couples to a narrow quantum-emitter transition in the defect-center layer. The coupling creates two interfering excitation paths, producing a transparency dip in the spectrum at the Fano frequency $\omega_f$; under pulsed excitation the same coupling stretches the plasmon oscillation lifetime. The paper drives the dipole at $\omega_f=550$ nm and measures the time-integrated mean intensity on a monitor plane at $z_0=5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, turning the lifetime extension into a directly observable intensity gain.

What would settle it

Run the same FDTD setup for four configurations—bare gold, silica-core only, quantum-emitter layer only, and silica-core plus quantum-emitter layer—and compare the time-integrated intensity at $z_0=5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$. If the full-stack gain over bare gold is far from 450, or the emitter-layer-only gain is far from 30, the multiplicative claim fails. A fabricated-nanowire measurement of SPP decay length with and without the emitter layer would directly test the lifetime extension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Fano resonance—the plasmonic analogue of electromagnetically induced transparency—extends the lifetime of propagating SPPs, not only localized plasmons. The authors simulate a gold-coated silica-core nanowire with and without a layer of densely implanted defect centers, modeled as a Lorentzian dielectric with resonance at the SPP resonance near 545 nm. The emitter layer produces a Fano dip near 550 nm, and when the dipole source is driven at that Fano frequency, the time-integrated intensity at $z_0=5\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ rises by $\mathrm{EF}_{\mathrm{fano}}\approx 30$ relative to the same nanowire without the emitter layer. Because the silica core alone is reported to give $\mathrm{EF}_{\mathrm{SiO_2}}=15$ over bare gold, the paper concludes the two enhancements are independent and multiplicative: $\mathrm{EF}_{\mathrm{tot}}=\mathrm{EF}_{\mathrm{fano}}\times \mathrm{EF}_{\mathrm{SiO_2}}=450$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two enhancement factors multiply: the roughly 30-fold Fano gain and the 15-fold silica-core gain are independent, so the combined gain reaches 450. The paper asserts this multiplicativity rather than demonstrating it in a single simulation of the full structure against a bare-gold baseline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SPP signals on nanowire interconnects could be read at several micrometers from the launch point with roughly 30 times more intensity than a plain gold wire.
  • The Fano-based gain can be added to other propagation-enhancement techniques, since the central claim is that the factors multiply rather than compete.
  • Parameter optimization of layer thicknesses, emitter oscillator strength, and drive frequency is expected to raise the enhancement beyond the reported values.
  • The reported 30-fold factor is described as a starting point, not a ceiling, because the simulations were run for only a few parameter sets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a single simulation of the full stack against bare gold would settle whether the two gains really multiply; the paper compares the Fano gain to the silica-core structure and the silica-core gain to bare gold separately.
  • Editorial inference: because the emitter layer is modeled as a Lorentzian line, electrically tunable defect centers could make the propagation-length extension switchable in a working device.
  • Editorial inference: reporting time-integrated intensity rather than a decay length leaves the effective lifetime gain implicit; converting the 30-fold intensity rise into a decay-length or lifetime change would make the result directly comparable to waveguide loss measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a Fano resonance induced by a quantum-emitter (QE) layer can extend the lifetime, and therefore the propagation distance, of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) on a gold-coated SiO2-core nanowire. Using 3D FDTD simulations with experimental dielectric functions, the authors report that the time-integrated mean electric-field intensity at a fixed distance z0 = 5 μm is about 30 times larger when the QE layer is present, and they claim this enhancement multiplies with the SiO2-core enhancement (EF_SiO2 = 15) to give EF_total = 450. The paper explicitly states that no parameter optimization was performed and that only a few parameter sets were tested.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed effect would be of clear interest for plasmonic interconnects, because a propagation-enhancement mechanism that multiplies other techniques would address a central limitation of SPP nanowire waveguides. The paper has several concrete strengths: it uses the actual experimental dielectric functions of gold and SiO2, it solves Maxwell's equations in 3D with a widely used FDTD package, it makes a falsifiable quantitative prediction (approximately 30-fold intensity enhancement at 5 μm), and it is unusually candid about the limited parameter exploration. The mechanism itself, Fano-resonance-induced lifetime extension, has prior support in the literature for localized plasmons, so the proposal is not implausible. However, as written, the evidence presented does not separately demonstrate the load-bearing claim of lifetime extension, and the reported enhancement factors rest on a single observable and on an asserted multiplicativity that is not directly simulated.

major comments (4)
  1. [FDTD Simulations, Fig. 4] The central claim that the QE layer extends the SPP lifetime is not supported by the reported observable. The quantity I(x,y) = ∫ dt |E(x,y,z0,t)|^2 at a single plane z0 = 5 μm conflates the launched SPP amplitude, the temporal pulse envelope, the mode overlap/group velocity, and the exponential decay rate of the propagating mode. A 30-fold increase in time-integrated intensity could result from improved end-fire coupling or pulse reshaping with an unchanged, or even shorter, SPP lifetime. To support the title and abstract claim, the authors should present either a time-resolved decay curve of the SPP field at z0, or a multi-z attenuation measurement from which the propagation loss (complex propagation constant) is extracted, for both configurations. Without this, the inference that the effect is 'lifetime extension' rather than 'better launching' is not established.
  2. [Notes [28] and closing paragraph] The multiplicative claim EF_total = EF_fano × EF_SiO2 = 450 is asserted rather than demonstrated. The bare-gold baseline is mentioned in Note [28] but not shown, and no simulation of the bare-gold-plus-QE configuration is reported, so the two mechanisms are never tested either jointly or in isolation in a way that would justify treating them as independent. The authors should present the bare-gold baseline and, at minimum, the three configurations (bare gold, SiO2 core without QE, SiO2 core with QE) under identical excitation and monitor conditions, and then show that the ratios are consistent with multiplication. Absent that, the central quantitative headline of 450x is not supported by the presented data.
  3. [Fig. 3 and FDTD Simulations paragraph] The radiative and nonradiative decay rates plotted in Fig. 3 characterize the dipole source (excitation and launching), not the attenuation of a propagating SPP mode. The propagation loss of an SPP is set by the complex propagation constant of the waveguide mode, and no mode analysis, attenuation-length extraction, or field-decay profile along z is presented. The authors should either explicitly connect the calculated γ_r and γ_nr to the propagation constant, or provide the missing waveguide-mode analysis. As it stands, Fig. 3 does not provide evidence for the claimed lifetime extension of the SPP.
  4. [Note [34] and 'approximately 30 times' claim] The central number EF_fano ~ 30 is the output of a single FDTD run (or a very small number of runs, per Note [34]), with no convergence study, no parameter scan, and no estimate of sensitivity to QE oscillator strength, linewidth, layer thicknesses, or dipole carrier frequency. The authors acknowledge this limitation, and I do not treat the absence of optimization as an error, but the paper presents 30 as a quantitative result. At minimum, the authors should state how many runs were performed, the spread of the resulting enhancement factors, and whether the reported 30x is representative or the best case. Without this, the 'approximately 30 times' claim is a single-sample observation rather than a demonstrated effect.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence 'In current CPUs the processing speed is limited by the poor electronic data transfer rates of the interconnects [5]' appears twice, once in the introduction and once in the FDTD Simulations section; one occurrence should be removed.
  2. [FDTD Simulations paragraph] There is a typo in 'We compare the the mean electric field intensity'; 'the the' should be 'the'.
  3. [Fig. 4] The color scale and normalization of the intensity maps in Fig. 4 are not defined. The authors should state whether the two panels use the same color scale and what the units (or arbitrary units) are, since the 30-fold ratio is the key quantitative result.
  4. [FDTD Simulations paragraph] The abbreviation 'FR' is used ('FR is the plasmon analog...') but is not explicitly defined; the authors should spell out 'Fano resonance' at first use.
  5. [FDTD Simulations paragraph] The parameters of the Lorentzian QE layer (Ω_QE = 545 nm, γ_QE = 10^10 Hz, f_osc = 0.2) are given without a reference or justification; the authors should cite the source for these values or state that they are representative choices.
  6. [References] The paper states that experimental dielectric functions for gold and SiO2 are used, but no reference or data source for these dielectric functions is provided. This should be added for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 30x enhancement is a new FDTD output, not a fit or a re-derivation of inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the FDTD-computed enhancement of SPP intensity when a QE layer is added. The simulation outputs are not constructed from the claimed result: no parameter is fitted to the 30x number, and the QE dielectric-function parameters are fixed a priori from literature values. The SiO2-core enhancement EF_SiO2=15 is also presented as a separate simulation result, not as a fitted input. The asserted multiplicativity EF_total=EF_fano×EF_SiO2=450 is an extrapolation rather than a demonstrated simulation, but it is not circular because it is not used to generate either factor. The paper does cite the authors' prior localized-plasmon lifetime-extension works [30,31], but this is background corroboration, and the SPP-specific claim rests on the new FDTD simulation. Any concern that the single-monitor integrated intensity conflates launch efficiency with SPP propagation lifetime is a validity or interpretation issue, not a circularity of derivation. No equation or fitted parameter in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a handful of chosen parameters (QE resonance, linewidth, oscillator strength, layer thicknesses) and on the transfer of the Fano-lifetime-extension mechanism from localized to propagating plasmons. The strongest structural assumption is multiplicativity of the two enhancement factors, which is asserted and not simulated.

free parameters (4)
  • QE layer oscillator strength f_osc = 0.2
    Chosen from refs [12-14, 17-19], not optimized; affects coupling strength and the depth of the Fano dip.
  • QE layer resonance wavelength Ω_QE = 545 nm
    Set equal to the SPP resonance Ω_p to achieve strong coupling; this choice creates the Fano dip near the drive frequency.
  • QE layer linewidth γ_QE = 10^10 Hz
    Chosen from prior literature; a narrow linewidth is required for a sharp Fano resonance.
  • NW geometry (gold/SiO2/QE layer thicknesses) = not stated in text (e.g., gold 20 nm in Fig. 2)
    Layer thicknesses affect mode confinement and loss; only a few values were tried.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption FDTD with Lumerical provides an exact solution of the 3D Maxwell equations for the simulated structure.
    Standard numerical method, but discretization, boundary conditions, and mesh settings are not described.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum-emitter layer can be modeled as a Lorentzian dielectric function.
    Defect-center ensembles are approximated by a Lorentzian permittivity with parameters from the literature; this is a standard effective-medium approximation.
  • domain assumption A Fano resonance induced by coupling a bright plasmon mode to a narrow quantum emitter extends the plasmon lifetime.
    This mechanism is established for localized plasmons in refs [30-33] and is here transferred to propagating SPPs.
  • domain assumption The SiO2 core reduces plasmon decay rates and provides an EF_SiO2=15 intensity enhancement relative to a bare gold NW.
    Taken from refs [21,22]; the bare-gold simulation is mentioned but not shown.
  • ad hoc to paper The two enhancement mechanisms (Fano and SiO2 core) act multiplicatively and independently.
    No simulation of the QE layer on a bare gold NW is presented, so the independence is assumed rather than demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Surface plasmon polaritons with extended lifetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7BNBRXJ6

@misc{pith2026250522953,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Surface plasmon polaritons with extended lifetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7BNBRXJ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22953}
}
read the original abstract

The propagation distance of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) on metal nanowires is severely limited by their short lifetime, primarily due to strong metallic losses. In this work, we show that the lifetime-and thus the propagation distance-of SPPs can be significantly extended through the use of Fano resonances. Our FDTD simulations demonstrate that the SPP intensity at a fixed propagation distance can be enhanced by approximately 30 times. Furthermore, this enhancement factor is multiplicative with improvements achieved through other methods. We emphasize that this result represents only a starting point, as no optimization was performed due to limited computational resources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22953 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. We investigate SPP propagation over a NW. The SPP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. We compare SPP propagation in two different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Radiative ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Mean electric-field intensity distribution on the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    We observed that using a SiO 2 insulator core [21, 22] enhances the intensity atz=z 0 = 5µm by a factor of EF SiO2 = 15

    We also performed similar FDTD simulations with a bare gold nanowire. We observed that using a SiO 2 insulator core [21, 22] enhances the intensity atz=z 0 = 5µm by a factor of EF SiO2 = 15. The enhancement from the Fano resonance multiplies this EF SiO2 . We obtained EF SiO2 without optimizing the gold layer length or SiO 2 core width shown in Fig. 2a. M...

    work page

  2. [34]

    We were only able to perform a few trials with different values of the oscillator strength [12– 14] in the defect-center layer

    Unfortunately, our computational capacity is limited to a single processor. We were only able to perform a few trials with different values of the oscillator strength [12– 14] in the defect-center layer. We could not explore more than two different thicknesses for the gold, SiO2, and QE layers

    work page

  3. [1]

    Surface plasmons on gratings.Surface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings, pages 91–116, 2006

    Heinz Raether. Surface plasmons on gratings.Surface plasmons on smooth and rough surfaces and on gratings, pages 91–116, 2006

    work page 2006

  4. [2]

    Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots.Nature, 450(7168):402–406, 2007

    A V Akimov, A Mukherjee, CL Yu, DE Chang, AS Zibrov, PR Hemmer, H Park, and MD Lukin. Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots.Nature, 450(7168):402–406, 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [3]

    Exciting surface plasmon polaritons in the kretschmann configuration by a light beam.Physical Review B, 97(23):235407, 2018

    AP Vinogradov, A V Dorofeenko, AA Pukhov, and AA Lisyansky. Exciting surface plasmon polaritons in the kretschmann configuration by a light beam.Physical Review B, 97(23):235407, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [4]

    Plasmonics: Merging photonics and elec- tronics at nanoscale dimensions.Science, 311(5758):189– 193, 2006

    Ekmel Ozbay. Plasmonics: Merging photonics and elec- tronics at nanoscale dimensions.Science, 311(5758):189– 193, 2006. doi:10.1126/science.1114849. URLhttps:// www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1114849

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1114849 2006

  7. [5]

    On-chip optical interconnects.Intel Technology Journal, 8(2), 2004

    Mauro J Kobrinsky, Bruce A Block, Brandon C Barnett, Edris Mohammed, Miriam Reshotko, Frank Robertson, Scott List, Ian Young, Kenneth Cadien, et al. On-chip optical interconnects.Intel Technology Journal, 8(2), 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [6]

    Surface plasmon subwavelength optics.nature, 424 (6950):824–830, 2003

    William L Barnes, Alain Dereux, and Thomas W Ebbe- sen. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics.nature, 424 (6950):824–830, 2003

    work page 2003

Show all 36 references
  1. [7]

    Plasmonics: Localization and guiding of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures.Journal of applied physics, 98(1), 2005

    Stefan A Maier and Harry A Atwater. Plasmonics: Localization and guiding of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures.Journal of applied physics, 98(1), 2005

    2005

  2. [8]

    Nanowire plasmon excitation by adiabatic mode transformation.Physical review letters, 102(20): 203904, 2009

    Ewold Verhagen, Marko Spasenovi´ c, Albert Polman, and L Kuipers. Nanowire plasmon excitation by adiabatic mode transformation.Physical review letters, 102(20): 203904, 2009

    2009

  3. [9]

    Long-range SPPs in dielectric-metal-dielectric structures propagation distance can reach even cm

    Note1. Long-range SPPs in dielectric-metal-dielectric structures propagation distance can reach even cm. How- ever, confinement in these structures is over microns that limits the their use regarding the miniaturization

  4. [10]

    Limitations of particle-based spasers.Physical Review Letters, 118(23):237402, 2017

    G¨ unter Kewes, Kathrin Herrmann, Rogelio Rodr ´ ıguez- Oliveros, Alexander Kuhlicke, Oliver Benson, and Kurt Busch. Limitations of particle-based spasers.Physical Review Letters, 118(23):237402, 2017

    2017

  5. [11]

    Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers.Light: Science & Applications, 9(1):90, 2020

    Shaimaa I Azzam, Alexander V Kildishev, Ren-Min Ma, Cun-Zheng Ning, Rupert Oulton, Vladimir M Shalaev, Mark I Stockman, Jia-Lu Xu, and Xiang Zhang. Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers.Light: Science & Applications, 9(1):90, 2020

    2020

  6. [12]

    Strong coupling and induced trans- 4 parency at room temperature with single quantum dots and gap plasmons.Nature Communications, 9(1):4012, 2018

    Haixu Leng, Brian Szychowski, Marie-Christine Daniel, and Matthew Pelton. Strong coupling and induced trans- 4 parency at room temperature with single quantum dots and gap plasmons.Nature Communications, 9(1):4012, 2018

    2018

  7. [13]

    Quantum-dot-induced transparency in a nanoscale plas- monic resonator.Optics Express, 18(23):23633–23645, 2010

    Xiaohua Wu, Stephen K Gray, and Matthew Pelton. Quantum-dot-induced transparency in a nanoscale plas- monic resonator.Optics Express, 18(23):23633–23645, 2010

    2010

  8. [14]

    Ultrafast reversal of a fano resonance in a plasmon-exciton system.Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 88(7): 075411, 2013

    Raman A Shah, Norbert F Scherer, Matthew Pelton, and Stephen K Gray. Ultrafast reversal of a fano resonance in a plasmon-exciton system.Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 88(7): 075411, 2013

    2013

  9. [15]

    Fano resonances in the linear and nonlinear plas- monic response.Fano Resonances in Optics and Microwaves: Physics and Applications, 219, 2018

    Mehmet Emre Tasgin, Alpan Bek, and Selen Postacı. Fano resonances in the linear and nonlinear plas- monic response.Fano Resonances in Optics and Microwaves: Physics and Applications, 219, 2018. URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/ 978-3-319-99731-5_1

    2018

  10. [16]

    Fano resonances in photonics

    Mikhail F Limonov, Mikhail V Rybin, Alexander N Pod- dubny, and Yuri S Kivshar. Fano resonances in photonics. Nature Photonics, 11(9):543–554, 2017

    2017

  11. [17]

    High-density g- centers, light-emitting point defects in silicon crystal

    Koichi Murata, Yuhsuke Yasutake, Koh-ichi Nittoh, Susumu Fukatsu, and Kazushi Miki. High-density g- centers, light-emitting point defects in silicon crystal. AIP Advances, 1(3), 2011

    2011

  12. [18]

    Enhanced photoluminescence from nanopatterned carbon-rich silicon grown by solid-phase epitaxy.Applied Physics Letters, 91(5), 2007

    Efraim Rotem, Jeffrey M Shainline, and Jimmy M Xu. Enhanced photoluminescence from nanopatterned carbon-rich silicon grown by solid-phase epitaxy.Applied Physics Letters, 91(5), 2007

    2007

  13. [19]

    Hot ion implantation to create dense NV center ensembles in diamond.Applied Physics Let- ters, 124(13):134002, 03 2024

    Midrel Wilfried Ngandeu Ngambou, Pauline Perrin, Ionut Balasa, Alexey Tiranov, Ovidiu Brinza, Fabien B´ en´ edic, Justine Renaud, Morgan Reveillard, J´ er´ emie Silvent, Philippe Goldner, Jocelyn Achard, and Alexan- dre Tallaire. Hot ion implantation to create dense NV center ...

    2024 doi

  14. [20]

    Lumerical Inc., https://www.lumerical.com/

  15. [21]

    F¨ orster resonance energy transfer and molecular fluores- cence near gain assisted refractory nitrides based plas- monic core-shell nanoparticle.Plasmonics, 15(6):2081– 2093, 2020

    Pratima Rajput and Manmohan Singh Shishodia. F¨ orster resonance energy transfer and molecular fluores- cence near gain assisted refractory nitrides based plas- monic core-shell nanoparticle.Plasmonics, 15(6):2081– 2093, 2020

    2020

  16. [22]

    Epsilon-near-zero nanoparticles.Physical Review A, 107 (2):023501, 2023

    Ibrahim Issah, Jesse Pietila, Tommi Kujala, Matias Koivurova, Humeyra Caglayan, and Marco Ornigotti. Epsilon-near-zero nanoparticles.Physical Review A, 107 (2):023501, 2023

    2023

  17. [23]

    Radiative engineering of plas- mon lifetimes in embedded nanoantenna arrays.Optics Express, 18(5):4526–4537, 2010

    Ronen Adato, Ahmet Ali Yanik, Chih-Hui Wu, Gennady Shvets, and Hatice Altug. Radiative engineering of plas- mon lifetimes in embedded nanoantenna arrays.Optics Express, 18(5):4526–4537, 2010

    2010

  18. [24]

    This well-known mechanism is different from the Fano resonances caused by quantum emitters (QEs)

    Fano resonances can also occur when a dark plasmon mode—narrower than a bright mode—is coupled to a bright plasmon mode [16]. This well-known mechanism is different from the Fano resonances caused by quantum emitters (QEs). The latter is more suitable for integrated circuits b...

  19. [25]

    Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media.Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(2):633–673, 2005

    Michael Fleischhauer, Atac Imamoglu, and Jonathan P Marangos. Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media.Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(2):633–673, 2005

    2005

  20. [26]

    C. L. Garrido Alzar, M. A. G. Martinez, and P. Nussen- zveig. Classical analog of electromagnetically induced transparency.American Journal of Physics, 70(1):37–41, 01 2002. ISSN 0002-9505. doi:10.1119/1.1412644

    2002 doi

  21. [27]

    However, when the spatial profile of the plasmonic excitation is large, retardation effects can shift the Fano resonance substan- tially, as seen in Fig

    When the plasmonic system or the hotspot size is small, Fano resonances appear atω f = ΩQE, assuming all inter- actions occur at a single point [15, 35]. However, when the spatial profile of the plasmonic excitation is large, retardation effects can shift the Fano resonance su...

  22. [29]

    We note that another—third—effect can appear in the steady-state spectrum

    The Fano dip can also be observed by illuminating the coupled system with a pulsed laser and analyzing its spec- trum. We note that another—third—effect can appear in the steady-state spectrum. A QE can also be used to bring a plasmonic excitation into resonance. In this case,...

  23. [30]

    Plasmon lifetime enhancement in a bright-dark mode coupled system.Physical Review B, 101(3):035416, 2020

    Bilge Can Yildiz, Alpan Bek, and Mehmet Emre Tas- gin. Plasmon lifetime enhancement in a bright-dark mode coupled system.Physical Review B, 101(3):035416, 2020

    2020

  24. [31]

    Single-molecule-resolution ultra- fast near-field optical microscopy via plasmon lifetime ex- tension.Applied Physics Letters, 118(24), 2021

    Rasim Volga Ovali, Ramazan Sahin, Alpan Bek, and Mehmet Emre Tasgin. Single-molecule-resolution ultra- fast near-field optical microscopy via plasmon lifetime ex- tension.Applied Physics Letters, 118(24), 2021

    2021

  25. [32]

    Correlation between plasmon lifetime and near-field enhancement in nanoparticle-on- film systems.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 40(9):2330–2338, 2023

    Baixun Sun, Peng Lang, Boyu Ji, Yang Xu, Xiaowei Song, and Jingquan Lin. Correlation between plasmon lifetime and near-field enhancement in nanoparticle-on- film systems.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 40(9):2330–2338, 2023

    2023

  26. [33]

    Tailoring femtosecond lsp resonance and lifetime in a nanoresonator via phase retardation.Optics Express, 32(22):39718–39726, 2024

    Yulu Qin, Hanmin Hu, Haoyang Cheng, and Xiaolong Zhou. Tailoring femtosecond lsp resonance and lifetime in a nanoresonator via phase retardation.Optics Express, 32(22):39718–39726, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Enhancement of four-wave mixing via interference of multiple plasmonic conversion paths.Physical Review B, 93(3):035410, 2016

    Shailendra K Singh, M Kurtulus Abak, and Mehmet Emre Tasgin. Enhancement of four-wave mixing via interference of multiple plasmonic conversion paths.Physical Review B, 93(3):035410, 2016

    2016

  28. [36]

    Silent enhancement of sers signal without increasing hot spot intensities.Nanophotonics, 7(10):1687–1695, 2018

    Selen Postaci, Bilge Can Yildiz, Alpan Bek, and Mehmet Emre Tasgin. Silent enhancement of sers signal without increasing hot spot intensities.Nanophotonics, 7(10):1687–1695, 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.