REVIEW 1 cited by
Meta-Diagrams for 2-Parameter Persistence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We first introduce the notion of meta-rank for a 2-parameter persistence module, an invariant that captures the information behind images of morphisms between 1D slices of the module. We then define the meta-diagram of a 2-parameter persistence module to be the M\"{o}bius inversion of the meta-rank, resulting in a function that takes values from signed 1-parameter persistence modules. We show that the meta-rank and meta-diagram contain information equivalent to the rank invariant and the signed barcode. This equivalence leads to computational benefits, as we introduce an algorithm for computing the meta-rank and meta-diagram of a 2-parameter module $M$ indexed by a bifiltration of $n$ simplices in $O(n^3)$ time. This implies an improvement upon the existing algorithm for computing the signed barcode, which has $O(n^4)$ runtime. This also allows us to improve the existing upper bound on the number of rectangles in the rank decomposition of $M$ from $O(n^4)$ to $O(n^3)$. In addition, we define notions of erosion distance between meta-ranks and between meta-diagrams, and show that under these distances, meta-ranks and meta-diagrams are stable with respect to the interleaving distance. Lastly, the meta-diagram can be visualized in an intuitive fashion as a persistence diagram of diagrams, which generalizes the well-understood persistence diagram in the 1-parameter setting.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Barcoding Invariants and Their Comparison
All barcoding invariants of poset representations with the same basis have isomorphic kernels, hence equal generic discriminating power even when pairwise incomparable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.