REVIEW 1 cited by
Hybrid Multi-Criteria Preference Ranking by Subsorting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multi-criteria recommender systems can improve the quality of recommendations by considering user preferences on multiple criteria. One promising approach proposed recently is multi-criteria ranking, which uses Pareto ranking to assign a ranking score based on the dominance relationship between predicted ratings across criteria. However, applying Pareto ranking to all criteria may result in non-differentiable ranking scores. To alleviate this issue, we proposed a hybrid multi-criteria ranking method by using subsorting. More specifically, we utilize one ranking method as the major sorting approach, while we apply another preference ordering method as subsorting. Our experimental results on the OpenTable and Yahoo!Movies data present the advantages of this hybrid ranking approach. In addition, the experiments also reveal more insights about the sustainability of the multi-criteria ranking for top-N item recommendations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
OpenTable data with multi-criteria ratings
A new OpenTable dataset with 19,536 ratings, four criteria dimensions, and known user-ID cleaning issues is released for multi-criteria recommender research.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.