Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Too Slow to Be Useful? On Incorporating Humans in the Loop of Smart Speakers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.03969 v1 pith:7DYUVNYO submitted 2022-12-07 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords systemshumanslatencysmartautomatedincorporatinglongerloop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-time crowd-powered systems, such as Chorus/Evorus, VizWiz, and Apparition, have shown how incorporating humans into automated systems could supplement where the automatic solutions fall short. However, one unspoken bottleneck of applying such architectures to more scenarios is the longer latency of including humans in the loop of automated systems. For the applications that have hard constraints in turnaround times, human-operated components' longer latency and large speed variation seem to be apparent deal breakers. This paper explicates and quantifies these limitations by using a human-powered text-based backend to hold conversations with users through a voice-only smart speaker. Smart speakers must respond to users' requests within seconds, so the workers behind the scenes only have a few seconds to compose answers. We measured the end-to-end system latency and the conversation quality with eight pairs of participants, showing the challenges and superiority of such systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools