pith. sign in

arxiv: 2309.09449 · v1 · pith:7EA5AQ2Pnew · submitted 2023-09-18 · 💻 cs.DL

Multi-Affiliated Authors Behave Differently across Fields and Host Country Preferences: A Comparison in G7 and BRICS

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords countriesfieldsaffiliationsmulti-affiliatedmultiplesciencesacrossactive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper study author simultaneously engaged in multiple affiliations based on bibliometric data covered in the Web of Science for the 2017-2021 period. Based on the affiliation information in publication records, we propose a general classification for multiple affiliations within-country or cross-country for analyzing authors' behavior in multiple affiliations and preferences of host countries across research fields. We find a decrease in publications led by international multi-affiliated authorship after 2020, and China has shown a falling trend after 2018. More G7 countries are active in fields like Social Sciences, Clinical and Life Sciences. China, India, and Russia are active in physical sciences-related fields. Countries prefer to affiliate with G7 countries, especially in Clinical and Life Sciences. These findings may provide more insights into the understanding of the behavior and productivity of multi-affiliated researchers in the current academic landscape.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Foreign co-affiliations and performance measurement of universities and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2020-2023

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Foreign co-affiliated articles in Ukrainian institutions rose during 2022-2023, matched international co-authorship citation levels, and exceeded domestic-only output, but distort national performance measurement.