REVIEW 3 cited by
Taut foliations and contact pairs in dimension three
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present a new construction of codimension-one foliations from pairs of contact structures in dimension three. This constitutes a converse result to a celebrated theorem of Eliashberg and Thurston on approximations of foliations by contact structures. Under suitable hypotheses on the initial contact pairs, the foliations we construct are taut, allowing us to characterize taut foliations entirely in terms of contact geometry. This viewpoint reveals some surprising flexible phenomena for taut foliations, and provides new insight into the $L$-space conjecture. The first part of the proof builds upon the work on Colin and Firmo on positive contact pairs. The second part involves a wide generalization of a technical result of Burago and Ivanov on the construction of branching foliations tangent to continuous plane fields, and might be of independent interest.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Pseudo-Anosov flows on hyperbolic L-spaces
For every even n≥4, infinitely many surgeries on the n-chain link are hyperbolic L-spaces with n orbit-inequivalent pseudo-Anosov flows and n universally tight non-contactomorphic contact structures.
-
Infinite ECH Capacities and Anosov Flows
ECH capacities are infinite for cotangent disk bundles over genus at least two surfaces, obstructing oriented Anosov Hamiltonian flows in dimension four.
-
Topological invariance of Liouville structures for taut foliations and Anosov flows
Topologically conjugate taut foliations and orbit-equivalent Anosov flows produce exact symplectomorphic Liouville thickenings; the smoothing method also yields new collapsed Anosov flows.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.