Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.04024 v1 pith:7FOG3YSW submitted 2022-08-08 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords socialsimulacracomputingdesignsystemcommunitypopulatedbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Social computing prototypes probe the social behaviors that may arise in an envisioned system design. This prototyping practice is currently limited to recruiting small groups of people. Unfortunately, many challenges do not arise until a system is populated at a larger scale. Can a designer understand how a social system might behave when populated, and make adjustments to the design before the system falls prey to such challenges? We introduce social simulacra, a prototyping technique that generates a breadth of realistic social interactions that may emerge when a social computing system is populated. Social simulacra take as input the designer's description of a community's design -- goal, rules, and member personas -- and produce as output an instance of that design with simulated behavior, including posts, replies, and anti-social behaviors. We demonstrate that social simulacra shift the behaviors that they generate appropriately in response to design changes, and that they enable exploration of "what if?" scenarios where community members or moderators intervene. To power social simulacra, we contribute techniques for prompting a large language model to generate thousands of distinct community members and their social interactions with each other; these techniques are enabled by the observation that large language models' training data already includes a wide variety of positive and negative behavior on social media platforms. In evaluations, we show that participants are often unable to distinguish social simulacra from actual community behavior and that social computing designers successfully refine their social computing designs when using social simulacra.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 15 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. How Managers Perceive AI-Assisted Conversational Training for Workplace Communication

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Managers view AI-assisted role-play as useful low-stakes practice for workplace conversations, provided it offers customizable scenarios, actionable feedback, and human-AI teaming.

  2. AgoraSim: A Hybrid Agent-Based Modeling Framework

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgoraSim is a hybrid agent-based modeling framework that runs LLM, vision-language, and classical agents under a shared action space and compares scenario trajectories against matched classical ABM reference dynamics.

  3. Finding Common Ground: Using Large Language Models to Detect Agreement in Multi-Agent Decision Conferences

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM agents can run a simulated decision conference, and a dedicated agreement-detection agent helps the debate cover topics that match a real expert workshop.

  4. A Survey on LLM-based Multi-Agent System: Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Application

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This survey organizes recent LLM-based multi-agent research into task-solving, simulation, and agent-evaluation applications, and identifies efficiency and evaluation gaps as key open problems.

Pith tools