Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 103 references

Tracing Galaxy Evolution in infalling galaxies of Abell 496: From Starburst to Quenching

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Infalling late-type galaxies in Abell 496 pass through five stages — pre-triggering, starburst, peak, fading, quenching — in a few times 10^8 yr, with ram pressure driving massive galaxies and tides driving low-mass ones.

desk verdict New FUV data for A496 are solid, but the five-stage evolutionary sequence is a post-hoc narrative not supported by the tabulated sSFR values. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21983 v1 pith:7IKIGEKY submitted 2025-05-28 astro-ph.GA

M. M. López-Gutiérrez , H. Bravo-Alfaro , P. T. Rahna , G. A. Mamon , Y. L. Jaffé , L. F. Madrigal-Ayala , E. Acosta-Espinoza This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyevolutionAbell496rampressurestrippingtidalinteractionsstarformationquenchingFUVimagingHIdeficiencyclusterinfall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that late-type galaxies falling into the cluster Abell 496 do not die slowly: they pass through a short, five-stage burst of star formation and then quench, all within a few times $10^{8}$ yr. The evidence comes from 22 cluster galaxies detected in far-ultraviolet light, combined with their atomic-hydrogen (HI) content from radio observations. The authors propose a sequence: pre-triggering, initial star-formation triggering, peak star formation, star-formation fading, and quenching. Along this path, ordinary gas-rich spirals become HI-deficient, their star formation falls well below the star-forming main sequence, and the objects are on their way to becoming red passive galaxies. If the sequence is right, it provides a concrete timeline for the environmental transformation of cluster spirals and identifies which physical mechanism dominates for which galaxy mass.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the pairing of FUV emission with HI imaging, read against a projected phase-space diagram (line-of-sight velocity versus projected cluster-centric radius). FUV traces recent star formation through young massive stars; HI traces the cold gas that fuels it and that environmental processes strip away. The projected phase-space diagram divides the cluster into infalling, virialized, ram-pressure-stripped, and backsplash regions, letting the authors assign each galaxy an infall time and interpret its FUV morphology and HI disruption code as a stage along a single evolutionary track. Combining these two tracers turns 22 snapshot images into a proposed timeline.

What would settle it

A direct test is to measure resolved HI kinematics and optical velocities for the 22 galaxies to identify backsplash or pre-processed members: if a 'stage 1' galaxy projected near the core has already passed pericenter, the monotonic ordering fails. A simpler check is to compare each galaxy's assigned stage with its infall time inferred from the projected phase-space zones; later stages should show longer infall times, and a sample-level mismatch would falsify the quoted few-times-$10^{8}$ yr timescale.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is an evolutionary sequence for infalling late-type galaxies in Abell 496, read off from the combined FUV and HI properties of 22 cluster members. In the authors' picture, a normal gas-rich spiral enters the cluster, gets its star formation triggered (stage 2), reaches a peak of star formation with strong FUV asymmetries and HI disruption (stage 3), fades while the HI becomes deficient (stage 4), and finally drops below the main sequence into quenching (stage 5). The sequence is proposed to last a few times $10^{8}$ yr, and it splits by stellar mass: galaxies above $10^{9}$ M_sun with high specific star formation rates have no close companions and are attributed mainly to ram pressure stripping, while most low-mass objects have companions and are attributed mainly to tidal interactions. The authors emphasize that most FUV galaxies still retain significant HI, so the gas depletion is in its early stages and the infall is recent.

Load-bearing premise

The five-stage sequence stands or falls on the assumption that these 22 galaxies are first-infall objects caught at different moments of one monotonic path; if some are backsplash, group-pre-processed, or viewed at misleading projection angles, the ordering and the few-times-$10^{8}$ yr timescale do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • According to the paper, the transformation from normal gas-rich spiral to gas-poor, red, passive object in a cluster like A496 can happen in a few times 10^8 yr, much faster than the cluster's dynamical timescale.
  • Massive FUV galaxies in late stages having no close companions implies ram pressure stripping is the dominant agent for galaxies above about 10^9 M_sun.
  • Low-mass FUV galaxies mostly having companions implies tidal interactions, possibly pre-processing, are the dominant trigger for star formation in dwarfs.
  • The presence of blue, HI-rich galaxies projected near the cluster core implies A496 is being fed by fresh, gas-rich galaxies falling in from the foreground along the line of sight.
  • Since most FUV galaxies still have substantial HI, the paper concludes that gas depletion is in its early stages and most of the sample has not yet reached first pericenter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sequence is generic, the same FUV-plus-HI snapshot method could be applied cluster by cluster to build a statistical clock for environmental quenching, with each stage's duration testable by fitting stellar populations in larger samples.
  • The paper's mass split implies a boundary near 10^9 M_sun: above it the cluster's hot gas wins, below it gravity wins; whether that boundary shifts with cluster mass or gas density is an extension the paper does not test.
  • Because the UVIT fields were chosen where blue galaxies are common, the sample is not cluster-representative; a full-volume FUV survey would show whether stage-5 objects are truly rare or just outside the observed fields.
  • The prominence of FUV-peculiar but HI-normal galaxies suggests the star-formation response to infall precedes detectable gas removal; comparing young-star indicators with HI deficiency in individual galaxies could test this sequence of events.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents FUV imaging from UVIT-AstroSat and HI data from the VLA for 22 late-type galaxies in the central region of the cluster Abell 496. The authors derive FUV-based SFRs and sSFRs, classify the galaxies by HI and FUV morphology, place them in projected phase space, search for close companions, and propose a five-stage evolutionary sequence from pre-triggering to SF-quenching, with a total timescale of a few times 10^8 yr and a mass-dependent split between ram-pressure stripping and tidal interactions. The observational material is new and the photometric and statistical steps are generally careful, but the central evolutionary-sequence claim rests on a visual, non-quantitative assignment of galaxies to stages in Section 4.2, and the quoted timescale is imported from literature arguments rather than measured from the sample.

Significance. If the five-stage sequence and its short timescale were established, this would be a valuable contribution to our understanding of how infalling cluster galaxies are transformed from star-forming late types to quenched objects, and it would strengthen the case for a mass-dependent competition between ram-pressure stripping and tidal interactions. The paper has genuine strengths: it provides the first UV imaging of A496, uses two independent aperture methods for photometry, applies extinction and K-corrections, supports the high-sSFR excess with a binomial test, supports the velocity asymmetry with a shuffling test, and uses conservative companion criteria. However, the central interpretive layer is not yet quantitatively supported: the stage assignments in Table 3 do not follow from the tabulated sSFR, HI, and morphological parameters, and no ordering test is presented. The claimed few-times-10^8 yr timescale therefore currently functions as an assumption rather than a measured outcome.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.2 / Table 3] The five-stage evolutionary sequence is the central claim, but the stage assignments in Table 3, column 16, are not derivable from the quantitative columns 10-14. Section 4.2 defines the stages in prose without thresholds or ordering criteria, and the assigned stages are inconsistent with the tabulated sSFR values: ID 21 is placed in stage 4 ('SF-fading') while having log(sSFR_FUV) = -8.1, the highest specific star-formation rate in the entire sample, while ID 5, with log(sSFR_FUV) = -8.4, is placed in stage 2. ID 16 is the sole stage 5 object, with log(sSFR_FUV) = -10.8, but the text gives no quantitative criterion for this placement and notes only that it is too faint in FUV and HI to be displayed. No rank test (for example, Spearman correlation between stage number and sSFR, HI-deficiency, or FUV morphological class) is presented. Without such a test, the ordering is a post-hoc narrative; the table as it stands is equally compatible with a non-monotonic or heterogeneous population.
  2. [4.2 / Section 5] The quoted timescale of 'a few times 10^8 yr' is not measured from the A496 sample. Section 4.2 reasons that because most FUV galaxies retain fairly normal HI content and because literature starburst and HI-stripping timescales are of order 10^8 to several 10^8 yr, this constitutes a reasonable upper limit to the infall time. Even if the stage ordering were valid, this argument assumes a homogeneous first-infall history and that HI depletion begins at stage 1. The paper itself notes in Section 4.1 that the small sample cannot distinguish first infallers from backsplash or pre-processed galaxies, and Section 5 concedes that the UVIT fields were selected ad hoc and are not representative of the cluster. The timescale is therefore an assumption imported from external studies, not a result of this analysis, and it should be presented as such or supported by orbital modeling or simulation comparison.
  3. [4.1 / 4.2] The central claim that the 22 galaxies trace a single, monotonic first-infall evolutionary path is not protected against alternative orbital histories. Section 4.1 states that the sample cannot resolve whether the blue, HI-rich objects projected near the core are truly first infallers along the line of sight, and that the infall hypothesis is 'not totally supported' by the Mahajan et al. (2011) simulations. The PPS zones used in Figure 8 have broad, overlapping infall-time distributions (Table 4), so a galaxy's position does not uniquely determine its time since infall. Under these conditions, the five-stage sequence can absorb a heterogeneous mix of projection angles, backsplash orbits, and group-preprocessed galaxies. The data are consistent with an unordered collection of galaxies at different orbital phases; the authors should either restrict the claim to a phenomenological morphological sequence or provide a quantitative test that separates first infallers from other histories.
  4. [4.3] The mass-dependent split between ram-pressure stripping and tidal interactions is based on a small and partially contradictory subsample. Section 4.3 reports that eleven of the 22 FUV galaxies have a close companion, with isolated objects preferentially among the massive galaxies and companions preferentially among low-mass galaxies. However, the two lowest-mass, highest-sSFR galaxies (IDs 5 and 21) explicitly do not follow this trend, and the companion search uses conservative thresholds (100 kpc, 500 km/s) that exclude fast flybys, as the authors acknowledge for the possible neighbor of ID 9 at 700 km/s. With n = 22 and the acknowledged exceptions, the statistical separation between the two channels is marginal; binomial confidence intervals on the 11/22 fraction and on the mass-dependence contrast are needed before the claim that 'pre-processing does not appear to play a major role' for massive galaxies can be evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Section 2.1] The abstract contains a typo ('conduted' for 'conducted'), and the first sentence of the Introduction uses 'experiment' where 'experience' is meant; 'BGC' in Section 2.1 should be 'BCG'.
  2. [Table 3] The table header for column (15) is printed as 'olumn (15)'; also, the stage numbers in the last column are not defined in the table caption, requiring the reader to consult Section 4.2.
  3. [4.2] The subsection heading 'Infering the orbital histories' should be 'Inferring the orbital histories'.
  4. [Equation (2)] Equation (2) has mismatched parentheses: Flux[Jy] = 10^{(m(AB)_corr - 8.9)/2.5} should be written with a consistent bracketing structure.
  5. [Figure 9 / Figure A1] The captions state that evolutionary stage numbers are indicated in red in the bottom-left corner, but the only stage-5 object, ID 16, is deliberately not displayed because it is too faint; this should be stated explicitly in the caption of Figure 9.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild self-definitional element in the five-stage sequence; no load-bearing circularity.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.2, 'Evolutionary sequence from star forming to quenching'; Table 3, column (16)]
    "Considering the FUV and HI properties of the studied sample we propose an evolutionary pathway consisting of five steps. (1) Pre-triggering: galaxies display normal HI and their SFR remains close to the main sequence."

    The five stages are defined by the same FUV/SFR and HI observables that are later used to assign each object a stage in Table 3, column (16): stage 2 requires the FUV luminosity to rise and only minor HI perturbations; stage 4 requires the SFR to fade and the HI to appear disrupted; stage 5 is assigned to the one object that is faint in FUV and HI-deficient. The ordered list is then presented as an 'evolutionary sequence' lasting 'a few times 10^8 yr', with the timescale imported from literature rather than measured from the sample. Thus the chronological ordering is largely a re-description of the input classifications instead of a test against an independent dynamical clock.

full rationale

The central five-stage sequence is built from the same FUV and HI properties that define the stages, so the evolutionary ordering is partly self-referential: the paper proposes a time-ordered path and then assigns galaxies to that path using the same morphology and gas-deficiency indicators. This is a mild self-definitional element rather than a quantitative circular derivation, because no equation forces the result and the paper does not claim to predict an independent quantity from a fitted parameter. The main physical dichotomy, ram-pressure stripping versus tidal interactions, is supported by independent proxies: companion counts within 100 kpc and |Delta v| < 500 km/s, stellar mass cuts, and r-band asymmetry residuals. The self-citations to LG22 provide the HI catalog, cluster parameters, and the RPS anchoring pressure; those are data and measurements with independent content, not an unverified theorem on which the conclusion uniquely rests. The paper itself flags its limitations, including the small sample and the inability to distinguish true first infallers from projection effects (Section 4.1) and the ad-hoc field selection (Section 5). These are interpretive and statistical concerns, not circularity. Overall, no load-bearing circular step was found; the score reflects only the descriptive, self-referential construction of the five-stage taxonomy.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the calibration of FUV SFR, the phase-space infall-time zones, and the qualitative assumption that visual differences map to temporal stages. The companion criteria and mass threshold are user-chosen thresholds that shape the main astrophysical conclusions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Stellar mass threshold for low-mass vs. massive galaxies = log(M*/Msun) = 9.0
    Used to split the 22 galaxies into sub-samples; the central RPS-versus-tidal interpretation is based on this division. The threshold is taken from LG22, not re-derived here.
  • Companion search projected separation = 100 kpc
    Section 4.3; galaxies within this radius and within the velocity window are classified as having a close companion. The conclusion that low-mass galaxies are preferentially paired depends on this radius.
  • Companion search velocity window = |dv| <= 500 km/s
    Same section; the paper notes that wider windows would include flyby interactions, so this choice materially affects the companion classification.
  • sSFR threshold for high star-formation activity = log(sSFR) = -9.7 yr^-1 (0.2 Gyr^-1)
    Used to identify 19 of 22 galaxies as having elevated star formation; the paper acknowledges this threshold is conventional rather than a universal definition of a starburst.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The observed diversity in FUV morphology and HI structure among the 22 galaxies represents different phases of a single temporal sequence, rather than a set of unrelated physical states.
    This is the interpretive core of Section 4.2. There is no independent age indicator (e.g., spectral fitting or dynamical modeling) for individual galaxies that would place them on a common timeline.
  • domain assumption FUV luminosity converted to SFR using the Salim et al. (2007) calibration with the Chabrier IMF correctly traces recent star formation.
    Equation (3) in Section 3.2; this is a standard assumption in the literature, but the SFR enters directly into the sSFR values used to argue that most of the sample is above the main sequence.
  • domain assumption The projected phase-space infall times and zone boundaries from Pasquali et al. (2019) and Mahajan et al. (2011) are valid for Abell 496.
    Used in Section 4.1 to interpret the location of FUV galaxies in the PPS diagram and to argue that most are first infallers. These calibrations come from simulations of other clusters and carry large scatter.
  • domain assumption The Chabrier IMF and the adopted LCDM cosmology (Omega_m=0.3, Omega_Lambda=0.7, H0=70) are assumed.
    Stated in the introduction; this affects stellar masses, luminosities, and cluster scales.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tracing Galaxy Evolution in infalling galaxies of Abell 496: From Starburst to Quenching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IKIGEKY

@misc{pith2026250521983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tracing Galaxy Evolution in infalling galaxies of Abell 496: From Starburst to Quenching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IKIGEKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21983}
}
abstract

During the fall of late-type galaxies into clusters, they can experiment a variety of evolutionary mechanisms according their local environment. Consequently, studying the UV emission and the cold gas of late-type galaxies provide key insights in the evolution of short-lived starburst and galaxy quenching. In this work, we conduted a study of two 28' fields observed with UVIT-AstroSat in the central region of the Abell cluster A496 ($z=0.033$), including HI, data from NRAO VLA. We reported 22 cluster members detected in FUV; all of them are detected in HI, or have upper limits for the HI-mass. We find our FUV detected galaxies generally have higher specific star formation rates than other star forming galaxies. Most of the FUV galaxies with masses above 10$^9 \mathrm{M}_{\odot}$,and showing high sSFR have no close neighbors, pointing at RPS as the dominant mechanism affecting them. In contrast, most of the low-mass FUV objects present at least one companion, suggesting that tidal interactions also play an important role in the triggering of infalling galaxies. Combining the FUV-SFR with the HI properties of the observed galaxies in A496 we identify an evolutionary sequence consisting of five stages: (1) Pre-triggering, (2) Initial SF-triggering, (3) Peak of star-formation, (4) SF-fading, and (5) SF-quenching. During this path, normal gas-rich objects reach a gas-deficiency phase with SFR well below the main sequence. This process, prior to becoming a full passive galaxy, can be accomplished within a few 10$^{8}$ yr.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two degrees region around A496 showing the 1 𝑅200 (red circle). The two UVIT fields are shown with green circles and the VLA-Hi survey is indicated with a blue polygon. The Hi-detected galaxies are shown with blue squares (Hi-normal) and black diamonds (Hi-abnormal), see Sect. 2.3. The distribution of cluster members (not shown here) is rather regular, as seen in figure 3 of LG22. The cluster center is indicated wit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. UVIT FUV image of A496 with the 22 detected galaxies. FoV images of UV fields are shown in bluescale. Squares and diamonds represent Hi normal and abnormal galaxies, respectively, with color indicating the stellar mass: dark blue for masses above 109 M⊙, and magenta for masses below this threshold. The numbers correspond to the IDs listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The SFR upper panel and sSFR (bottom panel) vs. stellar mass diagram of the FUV galaxies. IDs come from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The relation between FUV flux and Hi-mass. The red line indicates the linear regression fit: log(fluxFUV ) = 0.3835 log(𝑀HI)−0.9093. The cor￾responding correlation factor is close to 0.5. The galaxy IDs are taken from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic orbit of a galaxy from infalling to the virialized zone in phase space. Individual blue-shaded ellipses represent the gas component that is diminished as the galaxy moves to denser regions. The black dashed line represents the cluster escape velocity, and the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Projected phase space diagram showing eight zones of 𝑇inf within 1 𝑅/𝑅200, defined by Pasquali et al. (2019). Each region corresponds to a different time since infall, indicated with dashed lines and red numbers running from 1 to 8 with decreasing infall lookback times…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of galaxies in the first four evolutionary stages of SF triggering/quenching. The UVIT FUV surface density (left panels) and the Hi maps (right panels) are overlaid on optical. The galaxy names are displayed in the upper-right corner, the galaxy IDs appear in …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Two examples of low-mass FUV galaxies showing clear asymme￾tries in the 𝑟-band (left panels). Residuals after subtracting an axial symmetric BMODEL are shown (right panels). [SDG99]-SRC 1275 (ID 4) is on top, and [SDG99]-SRC 1482 (ID 15) on the bottom. 5 SUMMARY AND C…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plane of sky motions (arrows) of FUV galaxies within the UVIT fields. Crosses (points) indicate motion along the LOS, away from (towards) the observer. The color code separates line-of-sight velocities in three slots (see text): low (blue), medium (green), and high (r…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    L., Morris S

    Balogh M. L., Morris S. L., Yee H. K. C., Carlberg R. G., Ellingson E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...488L..75B 488, L75

    doi:10.1086/310927 1997

  3. [3]

    L., Baldry I

    Balogh M. L., Baldry I. K., Nichol R., Miller C., Bower R., Glazebrook K., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/426079 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...615L.101B 615, L101

    doi:10.1086/426079 2004

  4. [4]

    E., Hernquist L., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ARA&A..30..705B 30, 705

    Barnes J. E., Hernquist L., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003421 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ARA&A..30..705B 30, 705

    arXiv 1992

  5. [5]

    Barsanti S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab61a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...71B 857, 71

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab61a 2018

  6. [6]

    Bellhouse C., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1285B 500, 1285

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3298 2021

  7. [7]

    Bertin E., Arnouts S., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1996164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..117..393B 117, 393

    doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  8. [8]

    Bianchi L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-011-0612-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Ap&SS.335...51B 335, 51

    doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0612-2 2011

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Bigiel F., Leroy A., Walter F., Blitz L., Brinks E., de Blok W. J. G., Madore B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1194B 140, 1194

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Boselli A., Gavazzi G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PASP..118..517B 118, 517

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    Boselli A., Cortese L., Boquien M., Boissier S., Catinella B., Lagos C., Saintonge A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A..66B 564, A66

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    Boselli A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039046 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646A.139B 646, A139

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Cayatte V., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...479..335B 479, 335

    Bou \'e G., Adami C., Durret F., Mamon G. A., Cayatte V., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...479..335B 479, 335

    2008 doi

  6. [14]

    H., Balkowski C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119..580B 119, 580

    Bravo-Alfaro H., Cayatte V., van Gorkom J. H., Balkowski C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301194 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119..580B 119, 580

    2000 doi

  7. [15]

    H., Balkowski C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...379..347B 379, 347

    Bravo-Alfaro H., Cayatte V., van Gorkom J. H., Balkowski C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...379..347B 379, 347

    2001 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Lobo C., Durret F., Scott T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...495..379B 495, 379

    Bravo-Alfaro H., Caretta C. A., Lobo C., Durret F., Scott T., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...495..379B 495, 379

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    Byrd G., Valtonen M., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/168362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...350...89B 350, 89

    1990 doi

  10. [18]

    A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RMxAA..59..345C 59, 345

    Caretta C. A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023RMxAA..59..345C 59, 345

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Catinella B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty089 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476..875C 476, 875

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    Cavaliere A., Fusco-Femiano R., 1976, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976A&A....49..137C 49, 137

    1976

  13. [21]

    H., Balkowski C., Kotanyi C., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ....100..604C 100, 604

    Cayatte V., van Gorkom J. H., Balkowski C., Kotanyi C., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115545 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ....100..604C 100, 604

    1990 doi

  14. [22]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    H., B \"o hringer H., Ikebe Y., Zhang Y

    Chen Y., Reiprich T. H., B \"o hringer H., Ikebe Y., Zhang Y. Y., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066471 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...466..805C 466, 805

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    Chen H., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.4654C 496, 4654

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    H., Kenney J

    Chung A., van Gorkom J. H., Kenney J. D. P., Crowl H., Vollmer B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138.1741C 138, 1741

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    Cortese L., Catinella B., Smith R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2021.18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PASA...38...35C 38, e035

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    L., Songaila A., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1038/266501a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977Natur.266..501C 266, 501

    Cowie L. L., Songaila A., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1038/266501a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977Natur.266..501C 266, 501

    1977 doi

  20. [28]

    S., McGaugh S

    Das M., Yadav J., Patra N., Dwarakanath K. S., McGaugh S. S., Schombert J., Rahna P. T., Murthy J., 2021, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-021-09749-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JApA...42...85D 42, 85

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    De Lucia G., Hirschmann M., Fontanot F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3059 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.5041D 482, 5041

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Donnari M., Pillepich A., Nelson D., Marinacci F., Vogelsberger M., Hernquist L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.4760D 506, 4760

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Dressler A., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157753 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...236..351D 236, 351

    1980 doi

  24. [32]

    A., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/114694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988AJ.....95..985D 95, 985

    Dressler A., Shectman S. A., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/114694 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988AJ.....95..985D 95, 985

    1988 doi

  25. [33]

    Durret F., Felenbok P., Lobo C., Slezak E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..139..525D 139, 525

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    George K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.4126G 479, 4126

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    George K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3593 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519.2426G 519, 2426

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07114.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346..601G 346, 601

    Goto T., Yamauchi C., Fujita Y., Okamura S., Sekiguchi M., Smail I., Bernardi M., Gomez P. L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07114.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346..601G 346, 601

    2003

  29. [37]

    E., Gott III J

    Gunn J. E., Gott III J. R., 1972, @doi [ ] 10.1086/151605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...176....1G 176, 1

    1972 doi

  30. [38]

    P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..101H 806, 101

    Haines C. P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..101H 806, 101

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    P., Giovanelli R., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984AJ.....89..758H 89, 758

    Haynes M. P., Giovanelli R., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/113573 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984AJ.....89..758H 89, 758

    1984 doi

  32. [40]

    S., Lee M

    Hwang H. S., Lee M. G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/528733 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...676..218H 676, 218

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    L., Smith R., Candlish G

    Jaff \'e Y. L., Smith R., Candlish G. N., Poggianti B. M., Sheen Y.-K., Verheijen M. A. W., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv100 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448.1715J 448, 1715

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    S., Tandon S

    Joseph P., Stalin C. S., Tandon S. N., Ghosh S. K., 2021, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-020-09680-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JApA...42...25J 42, 25

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Kenney J. D. P., van Gorkom J. H., Vollmer B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/420805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....127.3361K 127, 3361

    2004 doi

  36. [44]

    Kenney J. D. P., Abramson A., Bravo-Alfaro H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/2/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...59K 150, 59

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K 36, 189

    Kennicutt Robert C. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..189K 36, 189

    1998 doi

  38. [46]

    S., den Herder J.-W

    Kumar A., et al., 2012, in Takahashi T., Murray S. S., den Herder J.-W. A., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 8443, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray. p. 84431N ( @eprint arXiv 1208.4670 ), @...

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    B., Tinsley B

    Larson R. B., Tinsley B. M., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155753 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...219...46L 219, 46

    1978 doi

  40. [48]

    B., Tinsley B

    Larson R. B., Tinsley B. M., Caldwell C. N., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157917 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...237..692L 237, 692

    1980 doi

  41. [49]

    Lee B., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.1382L 466, 1382

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Lin X., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/accea2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956..148L 956, 148

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.1218L 517, 1218

    L \'o pez-Guti \'e rrez M. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.1218L 517, 1218

    2022 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Raychaudhury S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19236.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416.2882M 416, 2882

    Mahajan S., Mamon G. A., Raychaudhury S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19236.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416.2882M 416, 2882

    2011

  45. [53]

    Mahajan S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3202 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475..788M 475, 788

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    P., Postma J

    Mahajan S., Singh K. P., Postma J. E., Pradeep K. G., George K., C \^o t \'e P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2022.45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASA...39...48M 39, e048

    2022 doi

  47. [55]

    A., Biviano A., Bou \'e G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts565 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.3079M 429, 3079

    Mamon G. A., Biviano A., Bou \'e G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts565 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.3079M 429, 3079

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Cava A., Biviano A., Moretti A., Poggianti B., Bettoni D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.131M 631, A131

    Mamon G. A., Cava A., Biviano A., Moretti A., Poggianti B., Bettoni D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...631A.131M 631, A131

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    R., Sarazin C

    Markevitch M., Vikhlinin A., Forman W. R., Sarazin C. L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...527..545M 527, 545

    1999 doi

  50. [58]

    Molinari E., Chincarini G., Moretti A., de Grandi S., 1997, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997Msngr..90...23M 90, 23

    1997

  51. [59]

    Moore B., Katz N., Lake G., Dressler A., Oemler A., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1038/379613a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.379..613M 379, 613

    1996 doi

  52. [60]

    Moretti A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9f3b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897L..30M 897, L30

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Y., Hwang H

    Mun J. Y., Hwang H. S., Lee M. G., Chung A., Yoon H., Lee J. C., 2021, @doi [Journal of Korean Astronomical Society] 10.5303/JKAS.2021.54.1.17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JKAS...54...17M 54, 17

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    T., Sutaria F., Safonova M., Gudennavar S

    Murthy J., Rahna P. T., Sutaria F., Safonova M., Gudennavar S. B., Bubbly S. G., 2017, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2017.07.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&C....20..120M 20, 120

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    Nulsen P. E. J., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/198.4.1007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982MNRAS.198.1007N 198, 1007

    1982 doi

  56. [64]

    A., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194....1O 194, 1

    Oemler Jr. A., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...194....1O 194, 1

    1974 doi

  57. [65]

    A., Hudson M

    Oman K. A., Hudson M. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.463.3083O 463, 3083

    2016 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Bah \'e Y

    Oman K. A., Bah \'e Y. M., Healy J., Hess K. M., Hudson M. J., Verheijen M. A. W., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3845 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.5073O 501, 5073

    2021 doi

  59. [67]

    K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.1702P 484, 1702

    Pasquali A., Smith R., Gallazzi A., De Lucia G., Zibetti S., Hirschmann M., Yi S. K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3530 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.1702P 484, 1702

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    Peng Y.-j., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...721..193P 721, 193

    2010 doi

  61. [69]

    W., Pointecouteau E., Melin J

    Piffaretti R., Arnaud M., Pratt G. W., Pointecouteau E., Melin J. B., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...534A.109P 534, A109

    2011 doi

  62. [70]

    M., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..188P 642, 188

    Poggianti B. M., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..188P 642, 188

    2006 doi

  63. [71]

    M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697L.137P 697, L137

    Poggianti B. M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697L.137P 697, L137

    2009 doi

  64. [72]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887..155P 887, 155

    Poggianti B. M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887..155P 887, 155

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    T., Murthy J., Safonova M., Sutaria F., Gudennavar S

    Rahna P. T., Murthy J., Safonova M., Sutaria F., Gudennavar S. B., Bubbly S. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1748 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3028R 471, 3028

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    K., Jaff \'e Y., Candlish G., S \'a nchez-J \'a nssen R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d6c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843..128R 843, 128

    Rhee J., Smith R., Choi H., Yi S. K., Jaff \'e Y., Candlish G., S \'a nchez-J \'a nssen R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d6c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843..128R 843, 128

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    L., Han S., Yi S

    Rhee J., Smith R., Choi H., Contini E., Jung S. L., Han S., Yi S. K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...45R 247, 45

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    D., Parker L

    Roberts I. D., Parker L. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495..554R 495, 554

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    Saintonge A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1749S 462, 1749

    2016 doi

  70. [78]

    Salim S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..267S 173, 267

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    Salim S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..227....2S 227, 2

    2016 doi

  72. [80]

    Salinas V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533..341S 533, 341

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..103S 737, 103

    2011 doi

  74. [82]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  75. [83]

    Schmidt M., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/146614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959ApJ...129..243S 129, 243

    1959 doi

  76. [84]

    C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16204.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1175S 403, 1175

    Scott T. C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16204.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.403.1175S 403, 1175

    2010

  77. [85]

    Scott T. C., Cortese L., Brinks E., Bravo-Alfaro H., Auld R., Minchin R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01169.x10.1086/122162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419L..19S 419, L19

    2012

  78. [86]

    C., Morrison G., Windhorst R

    Sengupta A., Keel W. C., Morrison G., Windhorst R. A., Miller N., Smith B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3761 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...32S 258, 32

    2022 doi

  79. [87]

    Serna A., Gerbal D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9509080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...309...65S 309, 65

    1996 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    Slezak E., Durret F., Guibert J., Lobo C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999408 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..139..559S 139, 559

    1999 doi

  81. [89]

    Smith R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ab5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934...86S 934, 86

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    S., Steinhardt C

    Speagle J. S., Steinhardt C. L., Capak P. L., Silverman J. D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..214...15S 214, 15

    2014 doi

  83. [91]

    N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..128T 154, 128

    Tandon S. N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..128T 154, 128

    2017 doi

  84. [92]

    Tonnesen S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874..161T 874, 161

    2019 doi

  85. [93]

    Venkatapathy Y., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8df8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154..227V 154, 227

    2017 doi

  86. [94]

    Vollmer B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..427V 502, 427

    2009 doi

  87. [95]

    J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...561..708V 561, 708

    Vollmer B., Cayatte V., Balkowski C., Duschl W. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...561..708V 561, 708

    2001 doi

  88. [96]

    Vollmer B., Braine J., Pappalardo C., Hily-Blant P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810432 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...491..455V 491, 455

    2008 doi

  89. [97]

    Vulcani B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.3152V 480, 3152

    2018 doi

  90. [98]

    Wang J., Xu W., Lee B., Du M., Overzier R., Shao L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb9aa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...903..103W 903, 103

    2020 doi

  91. [99]

    Wang J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfc52 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...915...70W 915, 70

    2021 doi

  92. [100]

    Yagi M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1814 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1814Y 140, 1814

    2010 doi

  93. [101]

    Yagi M., Yoshida M., Gavazzi G., Komiyama Y., Kashikawa N., Okamura S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa68e3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...65Y 839, 65

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...81Y 838, 81

    Yoon H., Chung A., Smith R., Jaff \'e Y. L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...81Y 838, 81

    2017 doi

  95. [103]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.