Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Removing Skill Bias from Gaming Statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.05484 v1 pith:7J4JBNRD submitted 2018-03-14 physics.soc-ph stat.APstat.ME

classification physics.soc-phstat.APstat.ME
keywords datagoodmoveplayersbiaschanceeasilygaming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

"The chance to win given a certain move" is an easily obtainable quantity from data and often quoted in gaming statistics. It is also the fundamental quantity that reinforcement learning AI bases on. Unfortunately, this conditional probability can be misleading. Unless all players are equally skilled, this number does not tell us the intrinsic value of such move. That is because conditioning on one good move also inevitably selects a subset of better players. They tend to make other good moves, which also contribute to the extra winning chance. We present a simple toy model to quantify this "skill bias" effect, and then propose a general method to remove it. Our method is modular, generalizable, and also only requires easily obtainable quantities from data. In particular, it gets the same answer independent of whether the data comes from a group of good or bad players. This may help us to eventually break free from the conventional wisdom of "learning from the experts" and avoid the Group Thinking pitfall.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Engine-Equal, Human-Unequal: A Reproducible Outcome Skew in Engine-Assessed Equal Chess Positions

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Engine-equal chess positions carry small, reproducible human outcome skews that replicate across disjoint player groups, calendar halves, rating bands, and an out-of-sample month.

Pith tools