Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 76 references

The long-term optical flux variations of Compact Symmetric Objects

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that compact symmetric objects show low-amplitude optical variability—about two to three times weaker than blazars—and that the difference traces to weaker relativistic beaming, not to a different emission mechanism.

desk verdict Useful first census of CSO optical variability; the beaming interpretation is not yet isolated from host-galaxy dilution. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03236 v1 pith:7KIEN4EO submitted 2025-05-06 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Subhashree Swain , Vaidehi S. Paliya , D. J. Saikia , C. S. Stalin , Arya Venugopal , A. K. Bhavya , C. D. Ravikumar This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords compactsymmetricobjectsAGNopticalvariabilityrelativisticjetsblazarsbluer-when-brighterfractionalamplitudeDopplerbeamingZwickyTransientFacility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that compact symmetric objects (CSOs), the young, small radio galaxies whose jets are thought to lie at large angles to the line of sight, are low-amplitude optical variables whose light comes from the relativistic jet rather than from the host galaxy alone. Using five years of Zwicky Transient Facility data in g, r, and i bands for 38 bona fide CSOs and a matched sub-sample of 17 blazars, it reports mean fractional variability amplitudes of $F_{\mathrm{var}} \approx 0.084$, $0.070$, and $0.066$ in g, r, and i—roughly two to three times below the blazar values. It also reports that both populations turn bluer as they brighten. The paper concludes that the shared bluer-when-brighter behaviour points to the same jet-dominated emission mechanism, while the smaller CSO amplitude follows because their jets are seen at large angles and are only weakly Doppler-boosted. If correct, this makes CSOs a useful low-beaming control population for jet-physics studies.

What carries the argument

The main measurement is the fractional variability amplitude $F_{\mathrm{var}} = \sqrt{(S^2 - \bar{f}_{\mathrm{err}}^2)/\bar{f}^2}$, which compares the excess variance of a light curve to its mean flux and serves as the paper's yardstick for how variable a source is. The second piece is the matched-sample comparison, in which CSOs, FSRQs, and BL Lacs are paired by redshift and g-band brightness so that any variability difference is attributed to orientation rather than distance or luminosity. The third is the colour-magnitude diagram of near-simultaneous g-r colour against g magnitude, fit with a weighted least-squares line, whose slope reveals the bluer-when-brighter behaviour. The physical mechanism invoked to explain the amplitude gap is relativistic Doppler beaming tied to viewing angle.

What would settle it

Measure the host-galaxy light in the ZTF images of the nine matched CSOs by fitting and subtracting a galaxy profile, then recompute $F_{\mathrm{var}}$ from the nuclear flux alone. If the host-subtracted amplitudes rise to blazar levels, the variability gap is an artifact of steady starlight rather than weaker beaming; if the gap persists, the viewing-angle interpretation is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that a bona fide sample of 38 compact symmetric objects varies optically on month-to-year timescales with low amplitude: roughly 76% of those with usable g data, 87% of those with r data, and 78% of those with i data are variable, with 21 sources variable in all three bands. For the nine CSOs matched by redshift and g-band brightness to 5 flat-spectrum radio quasars and 12 BL Lac objects, the same analysis shows the CSO variability to be about two to three times weaker, with mean $F_{\mathrm{var}}$ values of $0.081\pm0.006$, $0.078\pm0.001$, and $0.065\pm0.002$, against $0.236\pm0.003$, $0.188\pm0.001$, and $0.136\pm0.004$ for FSRQs and $0.251\pm0.001$, $0.228\pm0.001$, and $0.185\pm0.001$ for BL Lacs. In addition, both CSOs and blazars show a bluer-when-brighter colour-magnitude trend, with 20 of the 25 CSOs that have detectable colour variations showing it. The paper interprets these results as evidence that the optical emission of CSOs is jet-produced and that the variability gap is a beaming effect: blazar jets point nearly at us, so perturbations are Doppler-amplified, while CSO jets lie at large viewing angles and receive only modest amplification.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the smaller CSO variability is caused by weaker Doppler beaming assumes that steady host-galaxy starlight does not dilute the measured variability, even though 31 of the 38 CSOs are galaxies while the comparison blazars are point-like.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CSOs join the class of jet-dominated, optically variable AGN rather than being quiet young radio sources in the optical band.
  • The shared bluer-when-brighter trend in CSOs and blazars implies that the same basic jet process, likely particle acceleration in shocks, operates across a wide range of jet orientations and Doppler factors.
  • The tentatively higher variability of CSO quasars over CSO galaxies in the r band supports orientation-based unification and motivates a larger sample to test it.
  • The measured $F_{\mathrm{var}}$ ratios between blazars and CSOs provide a route to estimate relative Doppler-boosting factors once host-galaxy light is accounted for.
  • Longer or higher-cadence monitoring of CSOs can connect their optical flickering to their known gamma-ray detections and test whether the jets remain active at small scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If host-galaxy starlight substantially dilutes CSO variability, the beaming interpretation would need revision; a clean test is to recompute $F_{\mathrm{var}}$ from host-subtracted images of the matched CSOs.
  • Because CSOs show bluer-when-brighter colour changes at amplitudes near the noise floor, they offer a low-Doppler-boost regime in which particle-injection and cooling models can be compared without the extreme amplification seen in blazars.
  • Extending the matching scheme to rest-frame bands and k-corrected luminosities could sharpen the colour-slope comparison and reveal whether the bluer-when-brighter slope itself depends on viewing angle.
  • A larger CSO sample could test a quantitative prediction: if beaming drives variability, the fractional variability amplitude should scale with radio core prominence, a proxy for viewing angle, across the population.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a ZTF-based study of long-term optical variability of 38 compact symmetric objects (CSOs) from the Kiehlmann et al. (2024a) bona fide catalog. The authors compute chi-square variability classifications and fractional variability amplitudes (Fvar) in g, r, and i bands, and compare a redshift- and magnitude-matched sub-sample of 9 CSOs with 5 FSRQs and 12 BL Lacs. They report low-amplitude variability in CSOs (mean Fvar roughly 0.084, 0.070, and 0.066 in g, r, and i), a 2-3x larger Fvar in blazars, and a bluer-when-brighter (BWB) colour trend in both classes. They interpret these results as evidence that CSO optical emission is jet-dominated and that the smaller amplitude in CSOs reflects weaker Doppler beaming due to larger viewing angles.

Significance. The descriptive census is useful: this appears to be the first systematic multi-band optical variability characterization of a bona fide CSO sample, and it uses standard, reproducible recipes on public ZTF data. The detection of variability in roughly half of the CSOs in all three bands and the BWB trend are interesting empirical results that will be a useful reference for future CSO work. However, the beaming interpretation is not uniquely supported because host-galaxy starlight can mimic both the amplitude suppression and the colour trend. If the authors can bound or remove the host contribution, the comparison would become a valuable constraint on orientation-based unification. As it stands, the central comparative claim is weakened.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4 / Conclusions item 4] The attribution of the lower CSO variability to weaker Doppler beaming is not isolated from host-galaxy dilution. In Section 2.1, 31 of 38 CSOs are classified as galaxies, and the matched sub-sample used for Table 4 includes six galaxies, whereas the blazar comparison objects are point-like. For a constant host flux H and a variable nuclear flux N(t), the fractional variability amplitude defined in Eq. (3) satisfies Fvar_obs = Fvar_nuc * <N>/(<N>+H); therefore a 2-3x suppression can be produced by host starlight alone, with no difference in beaming. Similarly, adding a red constant host to a variable blue nucleus produces a BWB colour-magnitude correlation even if the nuclear colour is constant. The manuscript does not measure or bound H/N, so the beaming interpretation stated in Section 4 and Conclusions items 4 and 5 is one possibility but not a demonstrated one. I ask for a host-subtraction or host-fraction analysis (for example, surface-brightness decomposition of the ZTF/SDSS images, or an upper limit on H/N derived from quasar-dominated CSOs) and a re-comparison on host-corrected nuclear fluxes.
  2. [Section 3.1.2 / Table 4] The claim that blazars are two to three times more variable than CSOs is not supported by a statistical test. The comparison in Table 4 involves only 7 CSOs, 5 FSRQs, and 10 BL Lacs, yet the paper reports only mean values and errors. Please add a two-sample test per band (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Mann-Whitney) on the Fvar distributions, and also test whether the ordering Fvar_g > Fvar_r > Fvar_i is significant within each class rather than inferred from the means.
  3. [Section 3.2 / Table 5] The colour-magnitude slopes reported in Table 5 are not consistent with the 'similar BWB behaviour' narrative. The CSO slopes are typically 0.8-1.5 mag per mag, while the blazar slopes are mostly below 0.5 mag per mag. A steep CSO slope is a natural signature of dilution by a red constant host, so this quantitative difference needs to be fitted with the host model and not simply grouped with blazars under the same jet interpretation. Please report the host-corrected slopes or explain the difference explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2] The matching criteria are stated as r-band magnitude within ±0.5 mag, the abstract says similar g-band magnitudes, and Table 1 lists only g; please clarify which quantity was matched and list the r magnitudes used.
  2. [Figure 5] The panel labelled J1158+1022 corresponds to the source J1158+2450 in Table 1; fix the label.
  3. [Section 3.1.2 / Table 4] After requiring variability in all three bands, the matched sample in Table 4 has 7 CSOs and 10 BL Lacs, while Section 2.2 introduces 9 CSOs and 12 BL Lacs; state the reduction explicitly.
  4. [Section 2.1] The quasar/galaxy classification via absolute B magnitude uses total SDSS magnitudes and therefore includes host starlight; this should be stated as a caveat when interpreting Table 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the variability statistics are measured from ZTF photometry and the beaming interpretation rests on independent radio-morphology priors.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are descriptive statistics computed directly from ZTF light curves (Eq. 3 for Fvar and the chi-square test of Eq. 2) plus an interpretive comparison with blazars. No parameter is fitted to the CSO/blazar contrast and then renamed a prediction; the Fvar values in Tables 2-4 and the colour-magnitude slopes in Table 5 are measurements, and the beaming interpretation is imported from prior radio-morphology work (e.g., Krezinger et al. 2020 and the orientation expectations for CSOs) rather than derived from the optical data. The CSO catalogue comes from the independent Kiehlmann et al. (2024a) compilation, and the blazar sample is selected from ROMA-BZCAT, so the sample definitions do not presuppose the variability outcome. Self-citations (Saikia et al. 1995; O'Dea and Saikia 2021; Swain et al. 2024) are used for background orientation expectations or a gamma-ray detection, not to force the variability comparison. The main caveat is physical, not logical: constant host-galaxy light can dilute Fvar and can in principle produce an apparent BWB trend, but this is an alternative explanation that the paper does not rule out, not a step in which the conclusion is identical to the input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the CSO catalog of Kiehlmann et al. (2024a) being correct, the standard assumption that CSOs are seen at large angles with weak Doppler boosting, and the implicit assumption that host galaxy starlight does not dominate the variability comparison. The statistical estimators are standard math. No free parameters are fitted to produce the main claim; the color-magnitude slopes are descriptive fits.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Kiehlmann et al. (2024a) catalog provides a correct bona fide list of CSOs.
    The sample is drawn entirely from this catalog; any contamination or incompleteness propagates into the variability statistics. Invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption CSOs are oriented at large angles to the line of sight with small Doppler factors.
    Used to interpret the lower Fvar of CSOs compared to blazars as a beaming effect rather than an intrinsic difference. Invoked in Section 4.
  • ad hoc to paper The optical emission from the CSO nucleus dominates over host galaxy light in the variability signal.
    The paper attributes the observed variability and BWB trend to the jet, but 31 of 38 CSOs are galaxies and host starlight is neither subtracted nor quantified, so this assumption is not tested. Invoked in Sections 3.2 and 4.
  • standard math Standard estimators (chi-square, Fvar) are unbiased for these unevenly sampled light curves.
    The variability statistics assume Gaussian errors and ignore red noise; this is standard practice but not explicitly justified. Invoked in Section 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The long-term optical flux variations of Compact Symmetric Objects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KIEN4EO

@misc{pith2026250503236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The long-term optical flux variations of Compact Symmetric Objects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KIEN4EO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03236}
}
read the original abstract

Compact Symmetric Objects (CSOs) are a distinct category of jetted active galactic nuclei (AGN) whose optical variability characteristics have not been well investigated. We present here the results of our investigation on the optical flux and colour variability properties of a bona fide sample of 38 CSOs. We used the g-, r- and i-bands data from the Zwicky Transient Facility survey that spans a duration of about 5 years. We also considered a comparison sub-sample of blazars that includes 5 flat spectrum radio quasars and 12 BL Lac objects with redshifts and g-band magnitudes similar to the limited sub-sample of 9 CSOs. These two sub-samples of AGN, chosen for this comparative study of their long-term optical variability, represent different orientations of their relativistic jets with respect to the observer. We found that both CSOs and blazars exhibit optical flux variations, although variability of CSOs is lower than that of blazars. The observed variability in both CSOs and blazars is attributed to the relativistic jets and the increased optical variations in blazars relative to CSOs are likely due to beaming effects. CSOs and blazars exhibit similar colour variations, with both of them showing a bluer when brighter trend. Such a colour variability pattern is expected due to processes associated with their relativistic jets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url doi volume year archivePrefix primaryClass eid adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.sta...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTION find.integer 't := #0 'int := int not t empty not and t #1 #1 substring 's :=...

  4. [4]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sent...

  5. [5]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or or or or FUNCTION ...

  6. [6]

    write newline

    " write newline " cite write " FUNCTION editor.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION editor.trans.postfix editor num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION trans.postfix translator num.names #1 > "( )" "( )" if FUNCTION authors.editors.reflist.apa5 'field := 'dot := field num.names 'numnames := numnames 'format.num.names := format.num.names na...

  7. [7]

    Available from:

    ENTRY address assignee author booktitle chapter cartographer day edition editor howpublished institution inventor journal key keywords month note number organization pages part publisher school series title type volume word year eprint doi url lastchecked updated archive archivePrefix primaryClass eid adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS output.state bef...

  8. [8]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize ":" * " " *...

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.doi doi empty skip "doi:" doi * "" * output if FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "] " * if FUNCTION format....

  2. [10]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

  3. [11]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year eprint archive archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label INTEGERS o...

  4. [12]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or...

  5. [13]

    716:30--70

    Abdo AA, Ackermann M, Agudo I, et al (2010) The Spectral Energy Distribution of Fermi Bright Blazars . 716:30--70. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/30, https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2040 arXiv:0912.2040 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    760(1):77

    An T, Baan WA (2012) The Dynamic Evolution of Young Extragalactic Radio Sources . 760(1):77. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/77, https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1760 arXiv:1211.1760 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    131(995):018002

    Bellm EC, Kulkarni SR, Graham MJ, et al (2019) The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results . 131(995):018002. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01932 arXiv:1902.01932 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 210(1):9

    Bilicki M, Jarrett TH, Peacock JA, et al (2013) Two micron all sky survey photometric redshift catalog: A comprehensive three-dimensional census of the whole sky. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 210(1):9. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/9, ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-00...

    2013 doi

  9. [17]

    756(1):13

    Bonning E, Urry CM, Bailyn C, et al (2012) SMARTS Optical and Infrared Monitoring of 12 Gamma-Ray Bright Blazars . 756(1):13. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/13, https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.4380 arXiv:1201.4380 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 226(2):20

    Fan JH, Yang JH, Liu Y, et al (2016) The spectral energy distributions of fermi blazars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 226(2):20. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/20, ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/226/2/20

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    484(4):5633--5644

    Gaur H, Gupta AC, Bachev R, et al (2019) Optical variability of TeV blazars on long time-scales . 484(4):5633--5644. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz322, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10731 arXiv:1901.10731 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    515(7527):376--378

    Ghisellini G, Tavecchio F, Maraschi L, et al (2014) The power of relativistic jets is larger than the luminosity of their accretion disks . 515(7527):376--378. doi:10.1038/nature13856, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.5368 arXiv:1411.5368 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    586(1):L25--L28

    Gopal-Krishna , Stalin CS, Sagar R, et al (2003) Clear Evidence for Intranight Optical Variability in Radio-quiet Quasars . 586(1):L25--L28. doi:10.1086/374655, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302188 arXiv:astro-ph/0302188 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  14. [22]

    131(1001):078001

    Graham MJ, Kulkarni SR, Bellm EC, et al (2019) The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives . 131(1001):078001. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01945 arXiv:1902.01945 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    157(3):95

    Gupta AC, Gaur H, Wiita PJ, et al (2019) Characterizing Optical Variability of OJ 287 in 2016-2017 . 157(3):95. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafe7d, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03964 arXiv:1803.03964 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    373(3):972--992

    Gupta N, Salter CJ, Saikia DJ, et al (2006) Probing radio source environments via HI and OH absorption . 373(3):972--992. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11064.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0605423 arXiv:astro-ph/0605423 [astro-ph]

    2006

  17. [25]

    Hartman RC, Webb JR, Marscher AP, et al (1996) Simultaneous Multiwavelength Spectrum and Variability of 3C 279 from 10 9 to 10 24 Hz . 461:698. doi:10.1086/177095

    1996 doi

  18. [26]

    460(1):339--347

    Jordi K, Grebel EK, Ammon K (2006) Empirical color transformations between SDSS photometry and other photometric systems . 460(1):339--347. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066082, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0609121 arXiv:astro-ph/0609121 [astro-ph]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kiehlmann S, Lister ML, Readhead ACS, et al (2024 a ) Compact symmetric objects. i. toward a comprehensive bona fide catalog. The Astrophysical Journal 961(2):240. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0c56, ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0c56

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Kiehlmann S, Readhead ACS, O’Neill S, et al (2024 b ) Compact symmetric objects. ii. confirmation of a distinct population of high-luminosity jetted active galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal 961(2):241. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0cc2, ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad0cc2

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    333:452--458

    Kirk JG, Rieger FM, Mastichiadis A (1998) Particle acceleration and synchrotron emission in blazar jets . 333:452--458. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801265, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9801265 arXiv:astro-ph/9801265 [astro-ph]

    1998 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496(2):1811--1818

    Krezinger M, Frey S, An T, et al (2020) J1110+4817 – a compact symmetric object candidate revisited . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496(2):1811--1818. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1669, ://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1669, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup....

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    899(2):141

    Lister ML, Homan DC, Kovalev YY, et al (2020) TXS 0128+554: A Young Gamma-Ray-emitting Active Galactic Nucleus with Episodic Jet Activity . 899(2):141. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba18d, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16970 arXiv:2006.16970 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    250(1):8

    Lyke BW, Higley AN, McLane JN, et al (2020) The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: Sixteenth Data Release . 250(1):8. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aba623, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09001 arXiv:2007.09001 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The Astrophysical Journal 780(1):87

    Marscher AP (2013) Turbulent, extreme multi-zone model for simulating flux and polarization variability in blazars. The Astrophysical Journal 780(1):87. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/87, ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/87

    2013 doi

  26. [35]

    298:114--127

    Marscher AP, Gear WK (1985 b ) Models for high-frequency radio outbursts in extragalactic sources, with application to the early 1983 millimeter-to-infrared flare of 3C 273. 298:114--127. doi:10.1086/163592

    1985 doi

  27. [36]

    A short presentation

    Massaro E, Maselli A, Leto C, et al (2015) The 5th edition of the Roma-BZCAT. A short presentation . 357(1):75. doi:10.1007/s10509-015-2254-2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07755 arXiv:1502.07755 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [37]

    19(1):138--142

    Mastichiadis A, Kirk JG (2002) Models of Variability in Blazar Jets . 19(1):138--142. doi:10.1071/AS01108

    2002 doi

  29. [38]

    821(2):L31

    Migliori G, Siemiginowska A, Sobolewska M, et al (2016) First Detection in Gamma-Rays of a Young Radio Galaxy: Fermi-LAT Observations of the Compact Symmetric Object PKS 1718-649 . 821(2):L31. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L31, https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01987 arXiv:1604.01987 [...

    2016 arXiv

  30. [39]

    O'Dea CP, Saikia DJ (2021) Compact steep-spectrum and peaked-spectrum radio sources . 29(1):3. doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00131-w, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02750 arXiv:2009.02750 [astro-ph.GA]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [40]

    266:713--717

    Oke JB, Gunn JE (1983) Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry. 266:713--717. doi:10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  32. [41]

    811(2):143

    Paliya VS, B \"o ttcher M, Diltz C, et al (2015 a ) The Violent Hard X-Ray Variability of Mrk 421 Observed by NuSTAR in 2013 April . 811(2):143. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/143, https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06399 arXiv:1508.06399 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [42]

    803(1):15

    Paliya VS, Sahayanathan S, Stalin CS (2015 b ) Multi-Wavelength Observations of 3C 279 During the Extremely Bright Gamma-Ray Flare in 2014 March-April . 803(1):15. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/15, https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.07363 arXiv:1501.07363 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Paliya VS, Stalin CS, Ajello M, et al (2017) Intra-night Optical Variability Monitoring of Fermi Blazars: First Results from 1.3 m J. C. Bhattacharya Telescope . 844(1):32. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa77f5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.10614 arXiv:1812.10614 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [44]

    , Raiteri, C

    Papadakis IE, Villata, M. , Raiteri, C. M. (2007) The long-term optical spectral variability of bl lacertae*. A&A 470(3):857--863. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077516, ://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077516

    2007 doi

  36. [45]

    In: Blazar Variability across the Electromagnetic Spectrum, p 9, doi:10.22323/1.063.0009, 0807.2119

    Perlman E, Addison B, Georganopoulos M, et al (2008) Thermal AGN signatures in blazars . In: Blazar Variability across the Electromagnetic Spectrum, p 9, doi:10.22323/1.063.0009, 0807.2119

    2008 arXiv

  37. [46]

    404:871--881

    Pihlstr \"o m YM, Conway JE, Vermeulen RC (2003) The presence and distribution of H I absorbing gas in sub-galactic sized radio sources . 404:871--881. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030469, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0304305 arXiv:astro-ph/0304305 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  38. [47]

    635:A185

    Principe G, Migliori G, Johnson TJ, et al (2020) NGC 3894: a young radio galaxy seen by Fermi-LAT . 635:A185. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937049, https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01476 arXiv:2003.01476 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [48]

    552(7685):374--377

    Raiteri CM, Villata M, Acosta-Pulido JA, et al (2017) Blazar spectral variability as explained by a twisted inhomogeneous jet . 552(7685):374--377. doi:10.1038/nature24623, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.02098 arXiv:1712.02098 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [49]

    526(3):4502--4513

    Raiteri CM, Villata M, Carnerero MI, et al (2023) Extreme photometric and polarimetric variability of blazar S4 0954+65 at its maximum optical and -ray brightness levels . 526(3):4502--4513. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3064, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11108 arXiv:2310.11108 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Rajput B, Stalin CS, Rakshit S (2020) Long term -ray variability of blazars . 634:A80. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936769, https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01105 arXiv:2001.01105 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [51]

    835(2):275

    Rakshit S, Stalin CS, Muneer S, et al (2017) Flux and Polarization Variability of OJ 287 during the Early 2016 Outburst . 835(2):275. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/275, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.07464 arXiv:1612.07464 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [52]

    466(3):3309--3322

    Rani P, Stalin CS, Rakshit S (2017) X-ray flux variability of active galactic nuclei observed using NuSTAR . 466(3):3309--3322. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3228, https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02768 arXiv:1612.02768 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [53]

    In: Objects of High Redshift, pp 165--175

    Readhead ACS (1980) VLBI mapping of the nuclei of radio galaxies and quasars . In: Objects of High Redshift, pp 165--175

    1980

  45. [54]

    276:768--771

    Readhead ACS, Cohen MH, Pearson TJ, et al (1978) Bent beams and the overall size of extragalactic radio sources . 276:768--771. doi:10.1038/276768a0

    1978 doi

  46. [55]

    Readhead ACS, Taylor GB, Xu W, et al (1996) The Statistics and Ages of Compact Symmetric Objects . 460:612. doi:10.1086/176996

    1996 doi

  47. [56]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2303.11361

    Readhead ACS, Ravi V, Blandford RD, et al (2023) The Evolution of Compact Symmetric Objects -- A Possible Connection with Tidal Disruption Events . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2303.11361. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.11361, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11361 arXiv:2303.11361 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 doi arXiv

  48. [57]

    van Roestel J, Duev DA, Mahabal AA, et al (2021) The ztf source classification project. i. methods and infrastructure. The Astronomical Journal 161(6):267. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abe853, ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/abe853

    2021 doi

  49. [58]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030635, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0304532 arXiv:astro-ph/0304532 [astro-ph]

    Saikia DJ, Gupta N (2003) Polarization asymmetry in CSS sources: Evidence of AGN fuel? 405:499--504. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030635, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0304532 arXiv:astro-ph/0304532 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  50. [59]

    276(4):1215--1223

    Saikia DJ, Jeyakumar S, Wiita PJ, et al (1995) Compact steep-spectrum radio sources and unification schemes . 276(4):1215--1223. doi:10.1093/mnras/276.4.1215

    1995 doi

  51. [60]

    737(2):103

    Schlafly EF, Finkbeiner DP (2011) Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD . 737(2):103. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103, https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4804 arXiv:1012.4804 [astro-ph.GA]

    2011 arXiv

  52. [61]

    269:352--374

    Schmidt M, Green RF (1983) Quasar evolution derived from the Palomar bright quasar survey and other complete quasar surveys. 269:352--374. doi:10.1086/161048

    1983 doi

  53. [62]

    134(6):2236--2251

    Sesar B, Ivezi \'c Z , Lupton RH, et al (2007) Exploring the Variable Sky with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey . 134(6):2236--2251. doi:10.1086/521819, https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0655 arXiv:0704.0655 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  54. [63]

    884(2):166

    Sobolewska M, Siemiginowska A, Guainazzi M, et al (2019 a ) First Hard X-Ray Observation of a Compact Symmetric Object: A Broadband X-Ray Study of a Radio Galaxy OQ+208 with NuSTAR and Chandra . 884(2):166. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3ec3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02084 arXiv:1...

    2019 arXiv

  55. [64]

    871(1):71

    Sobolewska M, Siemiginowska A, Guainazzi M, et al (2019 b ) The Impact of the Environment on the Early Stages of Radio Source Evolution . 871(1):71. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee78, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02147 arXiv:1812.02147 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [65]

    948(2):81

    Sobolewska M, Siemiginowska A, Migliori G, et al (2023) Obscuring Environment and X-Ray Variability of Compact Symmetric Objects Unveiled with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR . 948(2):81. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbb6c

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    366(4):1337--1345

    Stalin CS, Gopal-Krishna , Sagar R, et al (2006) Multiband optical monitoring of the blazars S5 0716+714 and BL Lacertae . 366(4):1337--1345. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09939.x

    2006

  58. [67]

    399(3):1357--1366

    Stalin CS, Kawabata KS, Uemura M, et al (2009) Simultaneous MITSuME g'R _ C I _ C monitoring of S5 0716+714 . 399(3):1357--1366. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15354.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1155 arXiv:0907.1155 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009

  59. [68]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2412.12857

    Swain S, Paliya VS, Saikia DJ, et al (2024) DA 362: A Gamma-ray Emitting Compact Symmetric Object . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2412.12857. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12857 arXiv:2412.12857 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Taylor GB, Readhead ACS, Pearson TJ (1996) Pinpointing the Center of Activity in Compact Symmetric Objects. I. Sources from the Pearson-Readhead Survey . 463:95. doi:10.1086/177225

    1996 doi

  61. [70]

    541(1):112--119

    Taylor GB, Marr JM, Pearson TJ, et al (2000) Kinematic Age Estimates for Four Compact Symmetric Objects from the Pearson-Readhead Survey . 541(1):112--119. doi:10.1086/309428, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0005209 arXiv:astro-ph/0005209 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  62. [71]

    35:445--502

    Ulrich MH, Maraschi L, Urry CM (1997) Variability of Active Galactic Nuclei . 35:445--502. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.445

    1997 doi

  63. [72]

    345(4):1271--1284

    Vaughan S, Edelson R, Warwick RS, et al (2003) On characterizing the variability properties of X-ray light curves from active galaxies . 345(4):1271--1284. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0307420 arXiv:astro-ph/0307420 [astro-ph]

    2003

  64. [73]

    Villata M, Raiteri, C. M. , Kurtanidze, O. M. , et al (2004) The webt bl lacertae campaign 2001 and its extension - optical light curves and colour analysis 1994–2002. A&A 421(1):103--114. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035895, ://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20035895

    2004 doi

  65. [74]

    33:163--198

    Wagner SJ, Witzel A (1995) Intraday Variability In Quasars and BL Lac Objects . 33:163--198. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.001115

    1995

  66. [75]

    Wilkinson PN, Polatidis AG, Readhead ACS, et al (1994) Two-sided Ejection in Powerful Radio Sources: The Compact Symmetric Objects . 432:L87. doi:10.1086/187518

    1994 doi

  67. [76]

    259(2):49

    Zhang BK, Zhao XY, Wu Q (2022) Optical Spectral Variations of a Large Sample of Fermi Blazars . 259(2):49. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac5a52, https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02034 arXiv:2204.02034 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [77]

    519(4):5263--5270

    Zhang BK, Tang WF, Wang CX, et al (2023) The optical spectral features of 27 Fermi blazars . 519(4):5263--5270. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3795, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12331 arXiv:2212.12331 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.