pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.03818 · v1 · pith:7L5AVYKWnew · submitted 2019-07-08 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · math.DS

Optimal Control and Analysis of a Modified Trojan Y-Chromosome Strategy

Matthew A. Beauregard , Rana D. Parshad , Sarah Boon , Harley Conaway , Thomas Griffin , Jingjing Lyu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 00:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE math.DS
keywords Trojan Y-chromosome strategyoptimal controlinvasive speciesAllee effectmate competitionbiological controlpopulation extinctiondifferential equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified Trojan Y-chromosome model with mate competition and Allee effects shows optimal supermale releases can drive invasive populations to extinction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an updated model of the Trojan Y-chromosome strategy that adds intraspecies competition for mates and a strong Allee effect to the population equations. Optimal control theory is applied to this system to determine effective release schedules for supermales. A sympathetic reader would care because the results indicate that the eradication approach can still succeed under these more realistic conditions. The work therefore supplies concrete guidance for using the strategy against invasive species that damage ecosystems.

Core claim

The paper claims that the new TYC model incorporating mate competition and a strong Allee effect admits optimal control strategies that drive the invasive population to extinction, and that several conclusions about the viability of the approach follow directly from the analysis.

What carries the argument

The optimal control problem posed on the system of differential equations for female, male, and supermale densities, which yields the time-dependent release rate that achieves extinction.

If this is right

  • The strategy can still achieve extinction even after the added realism of mate competition and Allee effects.
  • Optimal release schedules can be calculated for given initial population sizes to minimize total supermales used.
  • The results supply large-scale implications for practical biological control of invasive species.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optimal-control approach might be tested on related sex-ratio manipulation methods such as sterile-insect releases.
  • Laboratory population experiments could check whether the chosen functional forms for competition and Allee effects match observed dynamics.
  • Early application of the optimal schedule may prove more efficient than constant-release policies.

Load-bearing premise

The specific functional forms chosen for intraspecies mate competition and the strong Allee effect must remain accurate across the full range of population densities that occur during control.

What would settle it

A field trial that applies the computed optimal supermale release schedule to a real invasive population and measures whether extinction occurs would directly test the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.03818 by Harley Conaway, Jingjing Lyu, Matthew A. Beauregard, Rana D. Parshad, Sarah Boon, Thomas Griffin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The pedigree tree of the TYC model (that demonstrates Trojan Y￾Chromosome eradication strategy). (a) Mating of a wild-type XX female (f) and a wild-type XY male (m). (b) Mating of a wild-type XX female (f) and a YY supermale (s). Red color represents wild types, and white color represents pheno￾types. The classical population model of the TYC strategy relates the popu￾lations of the wild-type XX females (f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the region where q(r, a) > 0 and q(r, a) < 0. While the Allee threshold is difficult to know precisely for any biological system [10], it is reasonable to expect values less than 5% of the carrying capacity [10, 20]. In such case, g(f+) > 0 then by the Intermediate Value Theorem we have f1 < f+ < f2. Subsequently, (f1, f1, 0) and (f2, f2, 0) are a saddle and a sink, respectively. We call (f2, f2, 0) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Female (top-red), male (top-green) and supermale (top-blue) densities and op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Female (top-red), male (top-green) and supermale (top-blue) densities and op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A plot of the integrands of the objective functions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A plot of the optimal controls for increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A plot of numerical simulations for increasing size of noise ranging from 0% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Trojan Y Chromosome (TYC) Strategy is a promising eradication method that attempts to manipulate the female to male ratio to promote the reduction of the population of an invasive species. The manipulation stems from an introduction of sex-reversed males, called supermales, into an ecosystem. The offspring of the supermales is guaranteed to be male. Mathematical models have shown that the population can be driven to extinction with a continuous supply of supermales. In this paper, a new model of the TYC strategy is introduced and analyzed that includes two important modeling characteristics, that are neglected in all previous models. First, the new model includes intraspecies competition for mates. Second, a strong Allee effect is included. Several conclusions about the strategy via optimal control are established. These results have large scale implications for the biological control of invasive species.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a modified mathematical model of the Trojan Y-Chromosome (TYC) eradication strategy that adds intraspecies competition for mates and a strong Allee effect to prior models. It then applies optimal control theory to derive supermale release strategies and claims several conclusions about the strategy's effectiveness, with stated large-scale implications for invasive species control.

Significance. Incorporating mate competition and Allee effects addresses two biologically plausible omissions in earlier TYC models. If the chosen functional forms prove robust, the optimal-control results could inform practical release schedules. The work is a modeling extension rather than a data-driven validation or field test; its impact therefore depends on whether the new terms alter the qualitative predictions in a manner that survives changes in functional form or parameter values.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (model formulation): The specific functional forms chosen for intraspecies mate competition and the strong Allee effect are introduced without derivation from data, without comparison to alternative functional forms, and without any sensitivity or robustness analysis. Because the optimal-control conclusions and eradication thresholds are derived directly from these terms, the absence of such checks makes the large-scale implications dependent on untested modeling choices.
  2. [§3] §3 (optimal control problem): No proof or numerical verification is supplied that the controlled system is well-posed (existence of solutions, boundedness, or existence of an optimal control). The abstract states that conclusions follow from optimal control, yet the well-posedness step required before interpreting the resulting release strategies is missing.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the new competition and Allee parameters is introduced without an explicit table of symbols or units, making it difficult to track dimensional consistency across the subsequent optimal-control analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will incorporate to strengthen the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (model formulation): The specific functional forms chosen for intraspecies mate competition and the strong Allee effect are introduced without derivation from data, without comparison to alternative functional forms, and without any sensitivity or robustness analysis. Because the optimal-control conclusions and eradication thresholds are derived directly from these terms, the absence of such checks makes the large-scale implications dependent on untested modeling choices.

    Authors: The functional forms are standard choices drawn from the ecological modeling literature for mate competition (density-dependent mating success) and strong Allee effects (threshold population density for positive growth). As a theoretical extension of prior TYC models, the manuscript focuses on qualitative impacts rather than data fitting. We agree, however, that the lack of sensitivity analysis leaves the robustness of eradication thresholds open to question. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection performing local sensitivity analysis on the competition and Allee parameters, together with a brief comparison to an alternative (e.g., Holling-type) functional form, to quantify how the optimal release schedules and extinction thresholds change. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (optimal control problem): No proof or numerical verification is supplied that the controlled system is well-posed (existence of solutions, boundedness, or existence of an optimal control). The abstract states that conclusions follow from optimal control, yet the well-posedness step required before interpreting the resulting release strategies is missing.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. The state system is a standard four-dimensional ODE with locally Lipschitz right-hand side and non-negative initial data, so global existence and boundedness follow from standard comparison theorems; the optimal-control existence follows from the Filippov–Cesari theorem given the compact control set and linear dependence on the control. These arguments were assumed rather than written out. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short subsection in §3 that states the relevant theorems, verifies the hypotheses, and adds a brief numerical check confirming that sample trajectories remain bounded under the computed controls. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new model equations and optimal control analysis are self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a new dynamical model that explicitly adds intraspecies mate competition and a strong Allee effect via chosen functional forms, then performs optimal control analysis on the resulting system. No quoted step shows a derived quantity reducing by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz imported from the authors' prior work. The functional forms are presented as modeling choices rather than outputs of the analysis itself, and the optimal-control conclusions are obtained by solving the stated problem; therefore the derivation chain does not collapse to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents enumeration of specific free parameters or axioms; the central claim rests on the unstated functional forms chosen for mate competition and the Allee effect, plus standard assumptions of optimal-control theory on ODEs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1075 out tokens · 14842 ms · 2026-05-25T00:26:15.932712+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large and Small Data Blow-Up Solutions in the Trojan Y Chromosome Model

    math.DS 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The TYC model admits finite-time blow-up with negative male solutions when trojan introduction rate is zero or large enough, under large or arbitrary positive initial data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Allee, Animal aggregations, The Quarterly Review of Biology 2, 367398 (1927)

    W.C. Allee, Animal aggregations, The Quarterly Review of Biology 2, 367398 (1927)

    work page 1927

  2. [2]

    Allee, Animal Aggregations

    W.C. Allee, Animal Aggregations. A Study in General Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1931

    work page 1931

  3. [3]

    M. Arim, S. Abades, P. Neill, M. Lima and P. Marquet,Spread Dynamics of invasive species , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 103, no.2, pp 374-378, 2006

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Averill and Y.Lou, On several conjectures from evolution of dispersal, , Journal of Biological Dynamics, vol.6, no.2, pp 117-130, 2012

    I. Averill and Y.Lou, On several conjectures from evolution of dispersal, , Journal of Biological Dynamics, vol.6, no.2, pp 117-130, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Bampfylde and M.A

    C.J. Bampfylde and M.A. Lewis, Biological control through intraguild predation:case studies in pest control, invasive species and range expan- sion, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol 69, pp 1031-1066, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Clark, M

    J.S. Clark, M. Lewis and L. Horvath, Invasion by extremes: Popula- tion spread with variation in dispersal and reproduction , The American Naturalist, vol 157, no.5, 2001

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Cotton and C

    S. Cotton and C. Wedekind Control of introduced species using Trojan sex chromosomes, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol 22, pp 441-443, 2007. 15

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Cotton and C

    S. Cotton and C. Wedekind, Introduction of Trojan sex chromosomes to boost population growth , Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol 249, pp 153-161, 2007

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Cotton and C

    S. Cotton and C. Wedekind, Population consequences of environmental sex reversal, Conservation Biology, vol 23, pp 196-206, 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Drake and A.M

    J.M. Drake and A.M. Kramer, Allee Effects, Nature Education Knowl- edge, 3(10):2, 2011

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    A. Gray, D. Greenhalgh, L. Hu, X. Mao, and J. Pan, A stochastic dif- ferential equation SIS epidemic model , SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71 (2011) 876902

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Gutierrez and J

    J.B. Gutierrez and J. Teem A model describing the effect of sex-reversed YY fish in an established wild population: the use of a Trojan Y- Chromosome to cause extinction of an introduced exotic species, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol 241, no.22, pp 333-341, 2006

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    J. B. Gutierrez, M. K. Hurdal, R. D. Parshad and J. L. Teem, Analysis of the Trojan Y Chromosome Model for Eradication of Invasive Species in a Dendritic Riverine System , Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol 64, no.1-2, pp 319-340, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Kennedy, K.A

    P.A. Kennedy, K.A. Meyer, D.J. Schill, M. R. Campbell, and N.V. Vue, Survival and reproduction success of hatchery YY male brook trout stocked in Idaho streams , Transactions of the American Fisheries Soci- ety, vol. 147, pp. 419-430, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Kramer, The evidence for Allee effects , Population Ecology 51, 341354 (2009)

    A.M. Kramer, The evidence for Allee effects , Population Ecology 51, 341354 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Lenhart and J.T

    S. Lenhart and J.T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Lou and D

    Y. Lou and D. Munther, Dynamics of a three species competition model, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-A, vol.32, pp 3099-3131, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Lyu, P.J

    J. Lyu, P.J. Schofield, K. M. Reaver, M.A. Beauregard, R.D. Parshad, A comparison of the Trojan Y Chromosome strategy to harvesting models 16 for eradication of non-native species , Nat. Resour. Model., in press (see arXiv:1810.08279)

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Myers, D

    J.H. Myers, D. Simberloff, A.M. Kuris and J.R. Carey, Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species , Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol.15, pp. 316-320, 2000

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Odum and W.C

    H.T. Odum and W.C. Allee, A note on thestable point of populations showing both intraspecies cooperation and disoperation , Ecol 35: 95-97, 1954

    work page 1954

  21. [21]

    Okubo, P.K

    A. Okubo, P.K. Maini, M.H. Williamson and J.D. Murray, The spread of the grey squirrel in Britain, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, vol.238, pp. 113-125

    work page

  22. [22]

    R. D. Parshad, On the long time behavior of a PDE model for invasive species control, International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, vol 5, no.40, pp 1991-2015, 2011

    work page 1991

  23. [23]

    R. D. Parshad and J. B. Gutierrez, On the Global Attractor of the Trojan Y-Chromosome Model, Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol 10, pp 339-359, 2011

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    R. D. Parshad and J. B. Gutierrez, On the well posedness of the Trojan Y Chromosome model, Boundary Value Problems, Volume 2010, Article ID 405816, pp 1-29, 2010

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    R. D. Parshad, S. Kouachi and J. B. Gutierrez, Global existence and asymptotic behavior of a model for biological control of invasive species via supermale introduction, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, vol 11, no.4, pp 951-972, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Perrin, Sex reversal: a fountain of youth for sex chromosomes ? Evolution, vol 63, pp

    N. Perrin, Sex reversal: a fountain of youth for sex chromosomes ? Evolution, vol 63, pp. 3043-3049, 2009

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    D. J. Schill, K.A. Meyer, and M. J. Hansen, Simulated effects of YY- male stocking and manual suppression for eradicating nonnative brook trout populations, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 37:10541066, 2017. 17

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Schill, J.A

    D.J. Schill, J.A. Heindel, M.R. Campbell, K.A. Meyer & E.R. Mamer, Production of a YY Male Brook Trout Broodstock for Potential Eradi- cation of Undesired Brook Trout Populations . North American Journal of Aquaculture, 78(1), 72-83, 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Schofield and W

    P. Schofield and W. Loftus, Nonnative fishes in Florida freshwaters: a literature review and synthesis , Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 25, no.1, pp. 117-145

    work page

  30. [30]

    Biological invasions: Theory and prac- tice

    N. Shigesada and K. Kawasaki, “Biological invasions: Theory and prac- tice”, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Stephens and W.J

    P.A. Stephens and W.J. Sutherlan, Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation, Trends Ecol Evol 14: 401-405, 1999

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Teem, J.B

    J.L. Teem, J.B. Gutierrez and R.D. Parshad, A comparison of the Tro- jan Y Chromosome model and daughterless carp eradication strategies , Biological Invasions, DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0475-2, Published online May 2013

    work page doi:10.1007/s10530-013-0475-2 2013

  33. [33]

    Biological Control

    R. Van Driesche and T. Bellows “Biological Control”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, 1996

    work page 1996

  34. [34]

    X. Wang, R. D. Parshad and J. Walton, The Stochastic Trojan Y Chro- mosome model for eradication of an invasive species , Journal of Biolog- ical Dynamics, vol 10, issue 1, pp 179-199, 2016

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    X. Wang, J. R. Walton, R. D. Parshad, K. Storey and M. Boggess,Anal- ysis of Trojan Y-Chromosome eradication strategy , Journal of Mathe- matical Biology, vol 68, issue 7, pp. 1731-1756, 2014

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Zhang and X

    W. Zhang and X. Men, Stochastic analysis of a novel nonautonomous periodic SIRI epidemic system with random disturbances, Physica A, 492 (2018), 1290-1301

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    X. Zhao, B. Liu and D. Ning, Existence of global attractor for the Tro- jan Y Chromosome model , Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, No.36, 16, 2012. 18

    work page 2012