Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.18783 v2 pith:7LTUWPQ3 submitted 2024-07-26 cs.DL

classification cs.DL
keywords circuitregionalgenderwomenacademicamericagloballatin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Latin-American scientific community has achieved significant progress towards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men scientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be underrepresented in scholarly communication. Throughout the 20th century, Latin America established its academic circuit, focusing on research topics of regional significance. Through an analysis of scientific publications, this article explores the relationship between gender inequalities in science and the integration of Latin-American researchers into the regional and global academic circuits between 1993 and 2022. We find that women are more likely to engage in the regional circuit, while men are more active within the global circuit. This trend is attributed to a thematic alignment between women's research interests and issues specific to Latin America. Furthermore, our results reveal that the mechanisms contributing to gender differences in symbolic capital accumulation vary between circuits. Women's work achieves equal or greater recognition compared to men's within the regional circuit, but generally garners less attention in the global circuit. Our findings suggest that policies aimed at strengthening the regional academic circuit would encourage scientists to address locally relevant topics while simultaneously fostering gender equality in science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Delineating Feminist Studies through bibliometric analysis

    cs.DL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid core-journal plus topic-modeling keyword workflow delineates 1.97 million gender/sex related publications in four languages from the Dimensions database, without relying on standard disciplinary classifications.

Pith tools