pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.17254 · v2 · pith:7MMAC2VInew · submitted 2026-03-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

The dominance of turbulence over magnetism in the formation of massive star cluster seeds

Junhao Liu , Patricio Sanhueza , Piyali Saha , Kaho Morii , Josep Miquel Girart , Qizhou Zhang , Fumitaka Nakamura , Paulo C. Cortes
show 27 more authors
Valeska Valdivia Benoit Commercon Patrick M. Koch Kate Pattle Xing Lu Janik Karoly Manuel Fernandez-Lopez Ian W. Stephens Huei-Ru Vivien Chen Chi-Yan Law Keping Qiu Shanghuo Li Henrik Beuther Eun Jung Chung Jia-Wei Wang Fernando A. Olguin Yu Cheng Jihye Hwang Sandhyarani Panigrahy Chakali Eswaraiah Maria T. Beltran Qiuyi Luo Spandan Choudhury Ji-hyun Kang Wenyu Jiao Luis A. Zapata A. -Ran Lyo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords massive star formationturbulencemagnetic fieldsprotoclustersdust polarizationALMA observationsstar cluster seedscondensations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observations show condensation elongations aligned parallel to magnetic fields, indicating turbulence dominates magnetism in massive star cluster seeds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents ALMA dust polarization observations across 30 massive star-forming regions that reveal smaller-scale condensations elongated preferentially parallel to local magnetic fields. This orientation reverses the perpendicular preference known for larger clouds and clumps. Matched simulations produce the observed parallel alignment only in runs where initial turbulence exceeds magnetic field strength; magnetically dominated runs instead yield perpendicular alignments. The data-simulation agreement implies turbulence, not magnetic fields, primarily shapes these condensations that set the stellar initial mass function and multiplicity in clusters.

Core claim

High-resolution dust polarization data from massive protoclusters show condensation elongations aligned parallel to B fields. Simulations of clustered massive star formation produce this parallel alignment exclusively when turbulence dominates magnetic fields initially, while B-field dominated models yield perpendicular alignments. The observational-simulation agreement implies turbulence plays the more important role in condensation formation, opposing predictions of magnetically regulated models. Additionally, a turbulence-induced misalignment between B fields and condensation rotation axes may reduce magnetic braking and enable larger protostellar disks.

What carries the argument

The statistical preference in alignment between the major axes of condensations and the directions of local magnetic fields, compared across observations and simulations varying the initial turbulence-to-magnetic field energy ratio.

If this is right

  • Turbulence dominates the shaping of condensations in protoclusters.
  • Classical magnetically regulated models do not apply at the condensation scale.
  • A preferential misalignment between magnetic fields and rotation axes may facilitate large disk formation by reducing magnetic braking.
  • This affects understanding of the initial mass function and stellar multiplicity in massive clusters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests magnetic regulation weakens at smaller scales within protoclusters.
  • Future observations could test if similar alignments appear in lower-mass star-forming regions.
  • Simulations with varying initial conditions could map the transition between turbulence and magnetic dominance.
  • The result may imply that protostellar disks in massive stars are larger than magnetic braking alone would allow.

Load-bearing premise

The initial turbulence-to-magnetic-field energy ratios chosen for the simulations accurately represent conditions in real protoclusters and projection effects do not produce the observed parallel alignment.

What would settle it

A statistically significant sample of protoclusters showing perpendicular rather than parallel alignment between condensation elongations and magnetic fields would falsify the turbulence-dominance claim.

read the original abstract

High-mass stars form in protoclusters, where gravo-magnetic processes shape collapsing clouds and clumps to be elongated preferentially perpendicular to magnetic (B) fields. Yet it remains unclear whether gravo-magnetic processes still govern the formation of smaller-scale condensations in massive-star-forming protoclusters, which are crucial for understanding the stellar initial mass function and multiplicity. Here we report the first statistical evidence that the condensation elongations are preferentially aligned with local B fields, based on high-resolution data from the largest dust polarization survey toward 30 massive star-forming regions with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). Our clustered massive star formation simulations reveal that this more parallel alignment is exclusively observed in models where initial turbulence dominates B fields. In contrast, models with initial B fields dominating turbulence distinctly exhibit a more perpendicular alignment. The comparison between observations and simulations suggests that turbulence could play a more important role than B fields in the formation of condensations in the context of clustered massive star formation, contradicting the prediction of classical magnetically regulated models. Moreover, we find a possibly turbulence-induced preferential misalignment between the B field and rotation axis of condensations, which may potentially reduce the magnetic braking efficiency and facilitate the formation of large protostellar disks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports ALMA dust polarization observations of 30 massive star-forming regions showing that condensations have elongations preferentially aligned parallel to local B-field directions. Clustered star-formation simulations are used to demonstrate that this parallel alignment appears exclusively in runs where initial turbulence dominates over magnetic fields, while magnetically dominated runs produce perpendicular alignments. The authors conclude that turbulence plays the dominant role in condensation formation, contradicting classical magnetically regulated models, and additionally report a possible turbulence-induced misalignment between B fields and condensation rotation axes that may reduce magnetic braking.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies the first statistical observational evidence, backed by targeted simulations, that turbulence rather than magnetic fields sets the geometry of small-scale condensations inside massive protoclusters. This has direct implications for the stellar initial mass function and for the formation of large protostellar disks. The use of an independent, large ALMA polarization survey and the explicit simulation-observation comparison are positive features.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation comparison] Simulation comparison section: the claim that parallel alignment occurs exclusively in turbulence-dominated models rests on the specific initial Mach number, plasma β, and turbulence-to-B energy ratios adopted. The manuscript must demonstrate that these values bracket the range inferred for real protoclusters (e.g., from observed linewidths and polarization fractions); otherwise the exclusivity of the parallel signature could be an artifact of the chosen parameter space rather than a robust discriminator against magnetically regulated models.
  2. [Observational analysis] Observational statistics (abstract and results): the reported preferential parallel alignment lacks quoted uncertainties, explicit data-exclusion criteria, projection-effect corrections, or quantitative metrics (e.g., Rayleigh statistic or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p-values) for the 30-region sample. These details are required to establish that the observed distribution is statistically inconsistent with the perpendicular alignment predicted by classical magnetic models.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Figure captions and text should clarify how synthetic polarization maps are generated and whether the same spatial filtering and signal-to-noise cuts applied to ALMA data are reproduced in the simulated observations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation comparison] Simulation comparison section: the claim that parallel alignment occurs exclusively in turbulence-dominated models rests on the specific initial Mach number, plasma β, and turbulence-to-B energy ratios adopted. The manuscript must demonstrate that these values bracket the range inferred for real protoclusters (e.g., from observed linewidths and polarization fractions); otherwise the exclusivity of the parallel signature could be an artifact of the chosen parameter space rather than a robust discriminator against magnetically regulated models.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the representativeness of the adopted simulation parameters strengthens the robustness of the turbulence-dominated interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct comparison of our initial Mach numbers, plasma β values, and turbulence-to-magnetic energy ratios against observational constraints from linewidths and polarization fractions reported for massive protoclusters in the literature. This addition will clarify that our parameter choices are consistent with typical conditions and reduce the possibility that the parallel-alignment signature is an artifact of a narrow parameter space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Observational analysis] Observational statistics (abstract and results): the reported preferential parallel alignment lacks quoted uncertainties, explicit data-exclusion criteria, projection-effect corrections, or quantitative metrics (e.g., Rayleigh statistic or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p-values) for the 30-region sample. These details are required to establish that the observed distribution is statistically inconsistent with the perpendicular alignment predicted by classical magnetic models.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current statistical presentation can be made more rigorous. In the revision we will report uncertainties on the measured alignment angles, explicitly list the data-exclusion criteria applied to the 30-region sample, discuss possible projection effects, and include quantitative tests (Rayleigh statistic and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p-values) comparing the observed distribution against both a uniform distribution and the perpendicular alignment expected from classical magnetic models. These additions will provide a clearer statistical basis for the claimed preference. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claim rests on independent observations and emergent simulation outcomes

full rationale

The paper derives its conclusion from external ALMA polarization data across 30 regions (showing parallel condensation-B alignments) compared against separate hydrodynamic/MHD simulation runs with varying initial turbulence-to-magnetic ratios. The parallel alignment emerges as a simulation outcome only in turbulence-dominated cases, not by definitional construction or parameter fitting within the paper. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no ansatzes are smuggled, and no predictions reduce to fitted inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained against the provided external benchmarks and simulation physics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract; the work relies on standard domain assumptions about gravo-magnetic processes at larger scales.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gravo-magnetic processes shape collapsing clouds and clumps to be elongated preferentially perpendicular to magnetic fields at larger scales.
    Invoked as established background to contrast with the new small-scale result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5926 in / 1125 out tokens · 22923 ms · 2026-05-25T06:42:51.892767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    & Tafalla, M

    Beuther, H., Kuiper, R. & Tafalla, M. Star Formation from Low to High Mass: A Comparative View.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.63, 1–44 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    A., Vine, S

    Bonnell, I. A., Vine, S. G. & Bate, M. R. Massive star formation: nurture, not nature. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.349, 735–741 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    J.792, 116 (2014)

    Zhang, Q.et al.Magnetic Fields and Massive Star Formation.Astrophys. J.792, 116 (2014). 25

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Li, H.-B.et al.Self-similar fragmentation regulated by magnetic fields in a region forming massive stars.Nature520, 518–521 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Planck Collaborationet al.Planck intermediate results. XXXV . Probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds.Astron. Astrophys.586, A138 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    & Goldsmith, P

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T. & Goldsmith, P. F. Low Virial Parameters in Molecular Clouds: Implications for High-mass Star Formation and Magnetic Fields.Astrophys. J.779, 185 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    & Zhang, Q

    Liu, J., Qiu, K. & Zhang, Q. Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: A Complete Compilation of All the DCF Estimations.Astrophys. J.925, 30 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Mouschovias, T. C. Nonhomologous contraction and equilibria of self-gravitating, mag- netic interstellar clouds embedded in an intercloud medium: star formation. II. Results. Astrophys. J.207, 141–158 (1976)

    work page 1976

  9. [9]

    & Li, Z.-Y

    Nakamura, F. & Li, Z.-Y . Magnetically Regulated Star Formation in Three Dimensions: The Case of the Taurus Molecular Cloud Complex.Astrophys. J.687, 354–375 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    D., Hildebrand, R

    Tassis, K., Dowell, C. D., Hildebrand, R. H., Kirby, L. & Vaillancourt, J. E. Statistical Assessment of Shapes and Magnetic Field Orientations in Molecular Clouds through Polarization Observations.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.399, 1681–1693 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    T.et al.Self-similarity of the magnetic field at different scales: The case of G31.41+0.31.Astron

    Beltr ´an, M. T.et al.Self-similarity of the magnetic field at different scales: The case of G31.41+0.31.Astron. Astrophys.686, A281 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    A suite of radiative magnetohydro- dynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.Astron

    Lebreuilly, U.et al.The Rosetta Stone Project: I. A suite of radiative magnetohydro- dynamics simulations of high-mass star-forming clumps.Astron. Astrophys.701, A217 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    J.904, 168 (2020)

    Beuther, H.et al.Gravity and Rotation Drag the Magnetic Field in High-mass Star Formation.Astrophys. J.904, 168 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    S., Bonnell, I

    Klos, K. S., Bonnell, I. A. & Smith, R. J. The role of magnetic fields in the formation of high-mass star-forming cores.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.539, 2307–2322 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    & Kainulainen, J

    Li, H.-b., Fang, M., Henning, T. & Kainulainen, J. The link between magnetic fields and filamentary clouds: bimodal cloud orientations in the Gould Belt.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.436, 3707–3719 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Sanhueza, P.et al.Gravity-driven Magnetic Field at 1000 au Scales in High-mass Star Formation.Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L10 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    C.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR)

    Cort ´es, P. C.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). II. Tomography through Dust and Molecular Line Polarization in NGC 6334I(N). Astrophys. J.923, 204 (2021). 26

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Fern ´andez-L´opez, M.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (Mag- MaR). I. Linear Polarized Imaging of the Ultracompact H II Region G5.89-0.39. Astrophys. J.913, 29 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    C.et al.MagMaR III—Resisting the Pressure, Is the Magnetic Field Overwhelmed in NGC6334I?Astrophys

    Cort ´es, P. C.et al.MagMaR III—Resisting the Pressure, Is the Magnetic Field Overwhelmed in NGC6334I?Astrophys. J.972, 115 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Saha, P.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR): Unveiling an Hourglass Magnetic Field in G333.46–0.16 Using ALMA.Astrophys. J. Lett.972, L6 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    A.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR)

    Zapata, L. A.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). IV . Tracing the Magnetic Fields in the O-type Protostellar System IRAS 16547–4247. Astrophys. J.974, 257 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Sanhueza, P.et al.Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). V . The Magnetic Field at the Onset of High-mass Star Formation.Astrophys. J.980, 87 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    W., Pineda, J

    Rosolowsky, E. W., Pineda, J. E., Kauffmann, J. & Goodman, A. A. Structural Analysis of Molecular Clouds: Dendrograms.Astrophys. J.679, 1338–1351 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Multiscale, multiwavelength extraction of sources and filaments using separation of the structural components: getsf.Astron

    Men’shchikov, A. Multiscale, multiwavelength extraction of sources and filaments using separation of the structural components: getsf.Astron. Astrophys.649, A89 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Astrophys

    Padoan, P.et al.Theoretical Models of Polarized Dust Emission from Protostellar Cores. Astrophys. J.559, 1005–1018 (2001)

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    D.et al.The relation between the column density structures and the magnetic field orientation in the Vela C molecular complex.Astron

    Soler, J. D.et al.The relation between the column density structures and the magnetic field orientation in the Vela C molecular complex.Astron. Astrophys.603, A64 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    & Arzoumanian, D

    Misugi, Y ., Inutsuka, S.-i. & Arzoumanian, D. Evolution of the Angular Momentum of Molecular Cloud Cores Formed from Filament Fragmentation.Astrophys. J.943, 76 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Ishihara, K.et al.Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). IV . Fragmentation in High-mass Star-forming Clumps.Astrophys. J.974, 95 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Motte, F.et al.ALMA-IMF. I. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Introduction to the Large Program and first results.Astron. Astrophys.662, A8 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Massive Star Formation

    Tan, J. C.et al.Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T. (eds) Massive Star Formation. (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.)Protostars and Planets VI, 149–172 (2014). 1402.0919

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    & Henning, T

    Commerc ¸on, B., Hennebelle, P. & Henning, T. Collapse of Massive Magnetized Dense Cores Using Radiation Magnetohydrodynamics: Early Fragmentation Inhibition. Astrophys. J. Lett.742, L9 (2011). 27

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    J.912, 159 (2021)

    Palau, A.et al.Does the Magnetic Field Suppress Fragmentation in Massive Dense Cores?Astrophys. J.912, 159 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Astrophys.682, A81 (2024)

    Beuther, H.et al.Density distributions, magnetic field structures, and fragmentation in high-mass star formation.Astron. Astrophys.682, A81 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    J.895, 142 (2020)

    Liu, J.et al.Magnetic Fields in the Early Stages of Massive Star Formation as Revealed by ALMA.Astrophys. J.895, 142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    J.945, 160 (2023)

    Liu, J.et al.Multi-scale Physical Properties of NGC 6334 as Revealed by Local Rela- tive Orientations between Magnetic Fields, Density Gradients, Velocity Gradients, and Gravity.Astrophys. J.945, 160 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    J.966, 120 (2024)

    Liu, J.et al.Dark Dragon Breaks Magnetic Chain: Dynamical Substructures of IRDC G28.34 Form in Supported Environments.Astrophys. J.966, 120 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Zhang, Y ., Guo, Z., Wang, H. H. & Li, H. b. Anchoring Magnetic Fields in Turbulent Molecular Clouds. II. From 0.1 to 0.01 pc.Astrophys. J.871, 98 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    & Shu, F

    Allen, A., Li, Z.-Y . & Shu, F. H. Collapse of Magnetized Singular Isothermal Toroids. II. Rotation and Magnetic Braking.Astrophys. J.599, 363–379 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    & Li, Z.-Y

    Wurster, J. & Li, Z.-Y . The role of magnetic fields in the formation of protostellar discs. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences5, 39 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    S., Dullemond, C

    Frank, A.et al.Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T. (eds) Jets and Outflows from Star to Cloud: Observations Confront Theory. (eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R. S., Dullemond, C. P. & Henning, T.)Protostars and Planets VI, 451–474 (2014). 1402.3553

    work page arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    Ohashi, N., Hayashi, M., Ho, P. T. P. & Momose, M. Interferometric Imaging of IRAS 04368+2557 in the L1527 Molecular Cloud Core: A Dynamically Infalling Envelope with Rotation.Astrophys. J.475, 211–223 (1997)

    work page 1997

  42. [42]

    Morphological comparison of molecular and thermal dust emission using the histogram of oriented gradients method.Astron

    Mininni, C.et al.ALMAGAL: IV . Morphological comparison of molecular and thermal dust emission using the histogram of oriented gradients method.Astron. Astrophys.699, A34 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    N., Matsumoto, T., Hanawa, T

    Machida, M. N., Matsumoto, T., Hanawa, T. & Tomisaka, K. Evolution of Rotating Molecular Cloud Core with Oblique Magnetic Field.Astrophys. J.645, 1227–1245 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    & Fromang, S

    Joos, M., Hennebelle, P., Ciardi, A. & Fromang, S. The influence of turbulence during magnetized core collapse and its consequences on low-mass star formation.Astron. Astrophys.554, A17 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Tracing magnetic fields with aligned grains.J

    Lazarian, A. Tracing magnetic fields with aligned grains.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.106, 225–256 (2007). 28

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. Shaw, R. A., Hill, F. & Bell, D. J. (eds)CASA Architecture and Applications. (eds Shaw, R. A., Hill, F. & Bell, D. J.)Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, V ol. 376 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 127 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    A.et al.Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA)

    Olguin, F. A.et al.Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). I. Dissecting the High-mass Star-forming Core G335.579-0.292 MM1.Astrophys. J.909, 199 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Vaillancourt, J. E. Placing Confidence Limits on Polarization Measurements.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.118, 1340–1343 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    & Clarke, D

    Naghizadeh-Khouei, J. & Clarke, D. On the statistical behaviour of the position angle of linear polarization.Astron. Astrophys.274, 968 (1993)

    work page 1993

  50. [50]

    M.et al.Resolving the Polarized Dust Emission of the Disk around the Massive Star Powering the HH 80-81 Radio Jet.Astrophys

    Girart, J. M.et al.Resolving the Polarized Dust Emission of the Disk around the Massive Star Powering the HH 80-81 Radio Jet.Astrophys. J. Lett.856, L27 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    J.861, 14 (2018)

    Contreras, Y .et al.Infall Signatures in a Prestellar Core Embedded in the High-mass 70µm Dark IRDC G331.372-00.116.Astrophys. J.861, 14 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    J.919, 79 (2021)

    Liu, J.et al.Calibrating the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi Method with Numerical Simu- lations: Uncertainties in Estimating the Magnetic Field Strength from Statistics of Field Orientations.Astrophys. J.919, 79 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement

    Teyssier, R. Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. A new high resolution code called RAMSES.Astron. Astrophys.385, 337–364 (2002)

    work page 2002

  54. [54]

    Mouschovias, T. C. & Spitzer, J., L. Note on the collapse of magnetic interstellar clouds. Astrophys. J.210, 326 (1976)

    work page 1976

  55. [55]

    Astrophys.528, A72 (2011)

    Hennebelle, P.et al.Collapse, outflows and fragmentation of massive, turbulent and magnetized prestellar barotropic cores.Astron. Astrophys.528, A72 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    K.et al.The Jeans Condition: A New Constraint on Spatial Resolution in Simulations of Isothermal Self-gravitational Hydrodynamics.Astrophys

    Truelove, J. K.et al.The Jeans Condition: A New Constraint on Spatial Resolution in Simulations of Isothermal Self-gravitational Hydrodynamics.Astrophys. J. Lett.489, L179–L183 (1997)

    work page 1997

  57. [57]

    & Teyssier, R

    Bleuler, A. & Teyssier, R. Towards a more realistic sink particle algorithm for the RAMSES CODE.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.445, 4015–4036 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    & Brauer, R

    Reissl, S., Wolf, S. & Brauer, R. Radiative transfer with POLARIS. I. Analysis of magnetic fields through synthetic dust continuum polarization measurements.Astron. Astrophys.593, A87 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Houde, M., Hull, C. L. H., Plambeck, R. L., Vaillancourt, J. E. & Hildebrand, R. H. Dis- persion of Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. IV . Analysis of Interferometry Data. Astrophys. J.820, 38 (2016). 29

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Taniguchi, K.et al.Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with the ALMA (DIHCA). III. The Chemical Link between NH 2CHO, HNCO, and H 2CO.Astrophys. J.950, 57 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    L., van der Tak, F

    Sch ¨oier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F. & Black, J. H. An atomic and molecular database for analysis of submillimetre line observations.Astron. Astrophys. 432, 369–379 (2005)

    work page 2005

  62. [62]

    A., Benson, P

    Goodman, A. A., Benson, P. J., Fuller, G. A. & Myers, P. C. Dense Cores in Dark Clouds. VIII. Velocity Gradients.Astrophys. J.406, 528 (1993)

    work page 1993

  63. [63]

    Astropy Collaborationet al.Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys.558, A33 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment.Computing in Science and Engineering9, 90–95 (2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    D.et al.An Imprint of Molecular Cloud Magnetization in the Morphology of the Dust Polarized Emission.Astrophys

    Soler, J. D.et al.An Imprint of Molecular Cloud Magnetization in the Morphology of the Dust Polarized Emission.Astrophys. J.774, 128 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    The shapes of molecular cloud cores in Orion.Mon

    Tassis, K. The shapes of molecular cloud cores in Orion.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.379, L50–L54 (2007)

    work page 2007

  67. [67]

    & Qiu, K

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q. & Qiu, K. Magnetic field properties in star formation: A review of their analysis methods and interpretation.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 9, 943556 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    L., Evans, I., N

    Kauffmann, J., Bertoldi, F., Bourke, T. L., Evans, I., N. J. & Lee, C. W. MAMBO mapping of Spitzer c2d small clouds and cores.Astron. Astrophys.487, 993–1017 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    M., Tang, Y .-W

    Koch, P. M., Tang, Y .-W. & Ho, P. T. P. Magnetic Field Strength Maps for Molecular Clouds: A New Method Based on a Polarization-Intensity Gradient Relation.Astrophys. J.747, 79 (2012). 30

    work page 2012