Improved stability threshold for 2D Navier-Stokes Couette flow in an infinite channel

Jiahong Wu; Tao Liang; Xiaoping Zhai

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Improved stability threshold for 2D Navier-Stokes Couette flow in an infinite channel

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves a global stability threshold of ν^{1/2} for 2D Navier–Stokes Couette flow in an infinite channel, removing the logarithmic loss of the previous best result.

desk verdict Genuine step toward the ν^{1/2} threshold, but Lemma 3.5's contradictory frequency set leaves the no-log bound unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00694 v2 pith:7MYB47PD submitted 2025-08-31 math.AP

Tao Liang , Jiahong Wu , Xiaoping Zhai This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q3535B6576B03

keywords stabilitythresholdCouetteflowNavier–StokesequationsNavierslipboundaryconditionsenhanceddissipationinvisciddampinginfinitechannelnonlinear

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the 2D Navier–Stokes Couette flow in the infinite channel R×[−1,1] with Navier slip boundary conditions is nonlinearly stable against vorticity perturbations of size ν^{1/2}, measured in an anisotropic Sobolev norm that keeps a small ε of extra x-integrability. This is the sharpest threshold obtained so far in this geometry: it removes the logarithmic factor (1+ln(1/ν))^{1/2} that Arbon–Bedrossian needed to pay for the difficulty of low-frequency, continuous-spectrum interactions. The ν^{1/2} scale is what linear theory and hydrodynamic-stability heuristics single out as critical, so the result identifies it as the natural stability threshold. The proof runs through a weighted energy method over the continuous frequency line: each Fourier mode k is assigned a ν-scaled weight and a singular-integral operator that encodes inviscid damping, and the nonlinear terms are partitioned by frequency so that a bootstrap closes without losing a logarithm. Thresholds of this type mark the quantitative boundary between the regime where shear flows return to Couette structure and the regime where perturbations may grow.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by a mode-wise weighted energy E_k[ω_k] on the continuous frequency line, built from an anisotropic weight α_k (ν^{2/3}|k|^{−2/3} for |k| ≥ ν, 1 for |k| ≤ ν) and a self-adjoint singular integral operator J_k defined via the Green's function of the channel Laplacian with homogeneous Dirichlet conditions in y; J_k converts inviscid damping into a coercive term. Summing over k with weight ⟨k⟩^{2m}⟨k−1⟩^{2ε} and exponential e^{2cλ_k t} gives the total energy E and dissipation D; the ⟨k−1⟩^{2ε} factor is the frequency trace of the (1/∂x)^{2ε} smoothing in the data norm and absorbs the low-frequency accumulation that previously cost a logarithm. The nonlinear fluxes N1, N2, N3

What would settle it

Resolve the two inconsistent characterizations of the set Ω1 in Lemma 3.5 (one line requires |k| ≥ ν, the next |k| ≤ ν) and verify that the bound N2 ≲ ν^{−1/2}E^{1/2}D_2^{1/2}D_4^{1/2} holds on the intended region with a ν-independent constant. Then test the pointwise inequality |ℓ|^{−1/2} ≲ ⟨ℓ−1⟩^ε⟨1/(k−ℓ)⟩^ε⟨k−1⟩^{1/2−2ε} over triples (k,ℓ,k−ℓ) spanning the three frequency regimes with |k| ∈ [ν,1]; a single configuration whose implied constant grows like (1+ln(1/ν))^c breaks the bootstrap and falsifies the ν^{1/2} threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for any m > 1 and ε ∈ (0, 1/12), if the initial vorticity ω_in of the perturbation satisfies Σ_{j=0}^{1} ||(ν^{1/3}∂y)^j ⟨∂x⟩^{(m−j)/3}(1/∂x)^ε ω_in||_{L²} ≤ ε0 ν^{1/2}, then System (1.3) is globally well-posed and the evolved vorticity obeys the uniform bound Σ_{j=0}^{1} ||e^{δλ_k t}(ν^{1/3}∂y)^j ⟨∂x⟩^{(m−j)/3}(1/∂x)^ε ω||_{L²} ≤ C ε0 ν^{1/2} for all t ≥ 0, where λ_k = ν^{1/3}|k|^{2/3} for |k| ≥ ν and λ_k = ν for |k| ≤ ν; the velocity perturbation additionally satisfies inviscid damping in L²_t. Enhanced dissipation means each non-zero Fourier mode decays on the time scale t ∼ ν^{−1/3} rather than the viscous scale ν^{−1}, so the flow forgets the perturbati

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear estimates of Lemmas 3.4–3.6 and the cited linear decay of Proposition 2.4 must hold with constants independent of ν and free of logarithmic factors in 1/ν; if any pointwise frequency bound (such as |ℓ|^{−1/2} ≲ ⟨ℓ−1⟩^ε⟨1/(k−ℓ)⟩^ε⟨k−1⟩^{1/2−2ε}) or hidden constant carries a log, the bootstrap E_total ≲ E_total(0) + ν^{−1/2}E^{3/2}_{total} does not close at the ν^{1/2} threshold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any perturbation whose initial vorticity is of size ν^{1/2} in the weighted anisotropic space remains at size C ε0 ν^{1/2} for all time, so the Couette background is globally stable at this amplitude.
Non-zero Fourier modes decay at the enhanced-dissipation rate ν^{1/3}|k|^{2/3}, meaning the relaxation time is t ∼ ν^{−1/3} instead of the viscous t ∼ ν^{−1}.
The velocity perturbation exhibits inviscid damping: horizontal velocity is square-integrable in time, so the flow returns to the shear profile.
The logarithmic factor in the previous best threshold is an artifact of the estimates, not of the physics: the natural ν^{1/2} scale is the correct threshold in this setting.
The bootstrap inequality E_total ≲ E_total(0) + ν^{−1/2}E^{3/2}_{total} is the quantitative engine of the result; closing it without logarithms is precisely the content of Lemmas 3.4–3.6.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same frequency-weighting idea plausibly sharpens the companion results of [2] on the plane and half-plane from ν^{1/2}(1+ln(1/ν))^{−1/2} to ν^{1/2}, because the logarithmic loss there originates from the same continuous-spectrum low-frequency interactions; this is an extension the paper does not itself state.
The paper proves stability at the ν^{1/2} scale but does not show that larger perturbations actually destabilize; a matching nonlinear-instability construction in this geometry would confirm that ν^{1/2} is the sharp threshold rather than merely a sufficient condition.
The (1/∂x)^ε condition in the data norm reads as a mild price in x-integrability paid to control the zero mode; for data whose x-average vanishes exactly, this suggests the threshold should hold with ε = 0, a testable weakening of the theorem's hypothesis.
The appearance of ν^ε losses precisely on the regions where one frequency crosses the ν-cutoff (|k| ≤ ν ≤ |k−ℓ|) shows the cutoff is the delicate point of the method; pushing ε up to 1/12 would require a new idea at that corner.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my take on Liang-Wu-Zhai. They claim to remove the log loss from Arbon-Bedrossian's ν^{1/2}(ln(1/ν))^{-1/2} threshold and get ν^{1/2} for the infinite channel with Navier slip. That's a real improvement if it works. The structure is sensible: import the linear theory (Proposition 2.4) and the J_k operator from [2] and [7], then add frequency-weighted nonlinear estimates to close the bootstrap at ν^{1/2}. The paper is honest about what it imports, so the circularity burden is low. Lemma 3.4 and many pieces of 3.6 look plausible, and the bootstrap (3.21) would close if every constant is ν-uniform.

But the stress-test note is right: Lemma 3.5 contains a set contradiction. Ω1 is first defined as {2|k−ℓ|≤|k|, |k−ℓ|≤ν, |k|≥ν}, then later rewritten as {2|k−ℓ|≤|k|≤ν, |k−ℓ|≤ν, |k|≥ν}, which is empty. That means the displayed estimate for the fourth term in (3.12) does not actually bound the intended low-high interaction region (small |k−ℓ|, moderate |k|) where Arbon–Bedrossian got their log. The no-log bound for that region is unproven. This is not a minor typo; it's the crux of the improvement. I also share the reader's unease about hidden ν-dependence in the cited Proposition 2.4 and in the many pointwise frequency inequalities that are asserted without proof. They might be true, but the text doesn't show them.

One more thing: Remark 1.1 calls ν^{1/2} the "optimal scale" based only on the stability side. That overreaches; there's no matching instability result. The right phrase is "expected scaling."

Who is this for? Researchers in the stability-threshold program. If the Lemma 3.5 gap is fixable—and it might be, by redoing that region with a sharper inequality—the result would be a solid contribution. As it stands, I wouldn't cite it as a theorem. But it deserves a serious referee and probably a round of revision. My recommendation: send it to peer review, with instructions to the referee to focus on Lemma 3.5 and the ν-uniformity of constants.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear stability of 2D Navier–Stokes Couette flow in the infinite channel R×[-1,1] with Navier slip boundary conditions. The main result (Theorem 1.1) asserts that perturbations of the initial vorticity of size ε0 ν^{1/2} in an anisotropic Sobolev space with a mild (1/∂x)^ε weight remain globally stable, enjoy enhanced dissipation at rate λ_k, and exhibit inviscid damping, for any m>1 and ε∈(0,1/12). This is claimed to improve the threshold of Arbon–Bedrossian by removing a logarithmic factor. The proof follows a standard bootstrap: a linear dissipation estimate (Proposition 2.4, imported from [2]), nonlinear weighted estimates (Lemmas 3.4–3.6), and an energy closure in Section 3.3.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it identifies the ν^{1/2} scaling as the sharp nonlinear stability threshold for Couette flow in an unbounded channel and removes a logarithmic loss that appeared in the only previous fully nonlinear result in this setting. The paper builds on the recent framework of Arbon–Bedrossian and contributes new frequency-weighted nonlinear estimates. The claimed theorem also gives explicit rates for enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping. However, the proof as written contains several load-bearing gaps in the low-frequency estimates, which are precisely the places where the logarithmic loss should be eliminated. At present the central claim is not convincingly established.

major comments (4)

[Lemma 3.5, Eq. (3.12) and Ω1]
[Section 3.1, definition of E; Theorem 1.1]
[Lemma 3.1, inequalities involving |k|^{-1/2} L^1 norms]
[Proposition 2.4 and Lemmas 2.1–2.3]

minor comments (4)

[Lemma 3.5, Eq. (3.12)]
[Section 3.3, Eq. (3.21)]
[Notation]
[Lemma 3.6, proof structure]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the threshold improvement depends on external cited linear estimates and the paper's own new nonlinear estimates; the flagged frequency-set contradiction is a correctness gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain of Theorem 1.1 is not circular. The linear dissipation estimate (Proposition 2.4) and the operator facts (Lemmas 2.1–2.3) are imported from Arbon–Bedrossian [2] and Bedrossian–He–Iyer–Wang [7]; none of these references is authored by Liang, Wu, or Zhai, so no self-citation is load-bearing. The new content is the frequency-weighted nonlinear bounds in Lemmas 3.4–3.6 and the bootstrap (3.21). None of these estimates assumes the logarithmic-loss bound they aim to remove; the bootstrap closes with E_total ≲ E_total(0)+ν^{-1/2}E_total^{3/2}, which is the usual nonlinear a priori estimate and does not define its conclusion into its hypotheses. The reader and skeptic correctly identify a serious internal gap in Lemma 3.5: the set Ω1 is displayed with contradictory conditions (both |k|≤ν and |k|≥ν), making that particular partition empty and leaving the intended low-frequency estimate textually unproven. That is a correctness/manuscript-quality issue, not a circularity: it does not show that any claimed prediction reduces to its inputs by construction. Similarly, the reliance on external results with ν-independent constants is a verification burden, not a circular step. Accordingly the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or data-fitted parameters. Its central claim rests on the cited linear framework of Arbon-Bedrossian and on frequency-weighted nonlinear estimates whose constants are asserted to be ν-uniform but are not made fully transparent in the provided text. The hand-chosen constants c_τ, c_α, c_β and δ are proof parameters, not empirical fits.

free parameters (2)

c_τ, c_α, c_β
Hand-chosen constants in the energy functional E_k used to ensure coercivity and to make the linear estimate in Proposition 2.4 hold. They are not fitted to data but are introduced ad hoc to make the proof work.
δ = sufficiently small positive constant
Decay-rate parameter in the exponential weight e^{δλ_k t} appearing in Theorem 1.1. Chosen small and independent of ν; its existence is asserted without explicit value.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Proposition 2.4: linear energy dissipation estimate for the linearized vorticity equation
Stated without proof and cited to Arbon-Bedrossian [2]. The entire nonlinear bootstrap depends on this linear estimate.
domain assumption Lemmas 2.1-2.3: boundedness and commutator estimates for the singular integral operator J_k
Imported from [2,7] without proof. The nonlinear estimates in Section 3 rely on these bounds.
standard math Standard Fourier analysis, Sobolev embedding, Gagliardo-Nirenberg, and Young's inequalities
Used throughout Lemmas 3.1-3.6 without proof, as is standard in the field.
domain assumption Navier slip boundary condition model and the vorticity formulation (1.3)
The governing PDE and boundary conditions are taken as given without derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improved stability threshold for 2D Navier-Stokes Couette flow in an infinite channel." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7MYB47PD

@misc{pith2026250900694,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improved stability threshold for 2D Navier-Stokes Couette flow in an infinite channel},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7MYB47PD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00694}
}

abstract

We study the nonlinear stability of the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations around the Couette shear flow in the channel domain $\mathbb{R}\times[-1,1]$ subject to Navier slip boundary conditions. We establish a quantitative stability threshold for perturbations of the initial vorticity $\omega_{in}$, showing that stability holds for perturbations of order $\nu^{1/2}$ measured in an anisotropic Sobolev space. This sharpens the recent work of Arbon and Bedrossian [Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 129] who proved stability under the threshold $\nu^{1/2}(1+\ln(1/\nu))^{-1/2}$. Our result removes the logarithmic loss and identifies the natural scaling $\nu^{1/2}$ as the critical size of perturbations for nonlinear stability in this setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[2]

Arbon, J

R. Arbon, J. Bedrossian, Quantitative hydrodynamic stability for Couette flow on unbounded domains with Navier boundary conditions, Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 129, 57 pp

work page 2025
[7]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Stability threshold of nearly-Couette shear flows with Navier boundary conditions in 2D, Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 28, 42 pp. 21

work page 2025
[1]

Albritton, R

D. Albritton, R. Beekie, M. Novack, Enhanced dissipation and H ¨ormander’s hypoellipticity, J. Funct. Anal, 283 (2022), Paper No. 109522, 38 pp

work page 2022
[3]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, On the stability threshold for the 3D Couette flow in Sobolev regularity, Ann. of Math., 185 (2017), 541–608

work page 2017
[4]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette flow I: Below threshold case, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 266 (2020), pp.v+158

work page 2020
[5]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette flow II: Above threshold case, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 279 (2022), pp.v+135

work page 2022
[6]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Uniform inviscid damping and inviscid limit of the 2D Navier-Stokes equation with Navier boundary conditions, arXiv:2405.19249

arXiv
[8]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Pseudo-Gevrey smoothing for the passive scalar equations near Couette, J. Funct. Anal., 289 (2025), Paper No. 110987, 178 pp

work page 2025

Show all 33 references

[9]

Bedrossian, N

J. Bedrossian, N. Masmoudi, Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar shear flows in the 2D Euler equations, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci., 122 (2015), 195–300

2015
[10]

Bedrossian, N

J. Bedrossian, N. Masmoudi, V . Vicol, Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid limit of the Navier-Stokes equations near the two dimensional Couette flow, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 219 (2016), 1087– 1159

2016
[11]

Bedrossian, V

J. Bedrossian, V . Vicol, F. Wang, The Sobolev stability threshold for 2D shear flows near Couette, J. Nonlinear Sci., 28 (2018), 2051–2075

2018
[12]

Q. Chen, T. Li, D. Wei, Z. Zhang, Transition threshold for the 2-D Couette flow in a finite channel,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 238 (2020), 125–183

2020
[13]

Q. Chen, D. Wei, Z. Zhang, Transition threshold for the 3D Couette flow in a finite channel, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 296 (2024)

2024
[14]

Y . Deng, N. Masmoudi, Long-time instability of the Couette flow in low Gevrey spaces, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 76 (2023), 2804–2887

2023
[15]

Ionescu, H

A. Ionescu, H. Jia, Inviscid damping near the Couette flow in a channel, Comm. Math. Phys., 374 (2020), 2015– 2096

2020
[16]

A. D. Ionescu, H. Jia, Nonlinear inviscid damping near monotonic shear flows, Acta Math., 230 (2023), pp. 321– 399

2023
[17]

Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion: rectilinear motion of viscous fluid between two parallel plates, Phil

L. Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion: rectilinear motion of viscous fluid between two parallel plates, Phil. Mag, 24 (1887), 188–196
[18]

H. Li, N. Liu, W. Zhao, Stability threshold of the two-dimensional Couette flow in the whole plane, arXiv:2501.10818

arXiv
[19]

H. Li, N. Masmoudi, W. Zhao, Asymptotic stability of two-dimensional Couette flow in a viscous fluid, arXiv:2208.14898

arXiv
[20]

H. Li, N. Masmoudi, W. Zhao, A dynamical approach to the study of instability near Couette flow, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 77 (2024), 2863–2946

2024
[21]

Masmoudi, W

N. Masmoudi, W. Zhao, Enhanced dissipation for the 2D Couette flow in critical space, Comm. Partial Differen- tial Equations, 45 (2020), 1682–1701

2020
[22]

Masmoudi, W

N. Masmoudi, W. Zhao, Stability threshold of two-dimensional Couette flow in Sobolev spaces, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´e C, Analyse Non lin´eaire, 39 (2022), 245–325

2022
[23]

Masmoudi, W

N. Masmoudi, W. Zhao, Nonlinear inviscid damping for a class of monotone shear flows in a finite channel, Ann. of Math., 199 (2024), 1093–1175

2024
[24]

Orr, The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid, Proc

W. Orr, The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid, Proc. Ir. Acad. Sect. A, Math Astron. Phys. Sci, 27 (1907),9–68

1907
[25]

Rayleigh, On the Stability, or Instability, of certain Fluid Motions, Proc

L. Rayleigh, On the Stability, or Instability, of certain Fluid Motions, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. , 11 (1879/80), 57–70
[26]

S. Ren, Z. Zhang, Linear inviscid damping in the presence of an embedding eigenvalue,Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 39, 70 pp

2025
[27]

Sommerfeld, Ein beitrag zur hydrodynamischen erkl ¨arung der turbulenten fl¨ussigkeitsbewegung, Atti del IV Congresso internazionale dei matematici, (1908), 116–124

A. Sommerfeld, Ein beitrag zur hydrodynamischen erkl ¨arung der turbulenten fl¨ussigkeitsbewegung, Atti del IV Congresso internazionale dei matematici, (1908), 116–124

1908
[28]

G. Wang, W. Wang, Transition threshold for the 2-D Couette flow in whole space via Green’s function, arXiv:2404.11878

arXiv
[29]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, Transition threshold for the 3D Couette flow in Sobolev space, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 74 (2021), 2398–2479

2021
[30]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, Nonlinear enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping for the 2D Couette flow,Tunis. J. Math., 5 (2023), 573–592

2023
[31]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, W. Zhao, Linear inviscid damping and vorticity depletion for Shear Flows, Ann. PDE, 5, (2019), Paper No. 3, 101 pp

2019
[32]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, W. Zhao, Linear inviscid damping and enhanced dissipation for the Kolmogorov flow, Adv. Math., 362 (2020), 106963

2020
[33]

D. Wei, Z. Zhang, H. Zhu, Linear inviscid damping for the β-plane equation, Commun. Math. Phys., 375 (2020), 127–174. 22 (T. Liang) SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS , SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY , GUANGZHOU , 510640, CHINA Email address: taolmath@163.com (J. Wu) DEPARTMENT OF MA...

2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Arbon, J

R. Arbon, J. Bedrossian, Quantitative hydrodynamic stability for Couette flow on unbounded domains with Navier boundary conditions, Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 129, 57 pp

work page 2025

[2] [7]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Stability threshold of nearly-Couette shear flows with Navier boundary conditions in 2D, Comm. Math. Phys., 406 (2025), Paper No. 28, 42 pp. 21

work page 2025

[3] [1]

Albritton, R

D. Albritton, R. Beekie, M. Novack, Enhanced dissipation and H ¨ormander’s hypoellipticity, J. Funct. Anal, 283 (2022), Paper No. 109522, 38 pp

work page 2022

[4] [3]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, On the stability threshold for the 3D Couette flow in Sobolev regularity, Ann. of Math., 185 (2017), 541–608

work page 2017

[5] [4]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette flow I: Below threshold case, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 266 (2020), pp.v+158

work page 2020

[6] [5]

Bedrossian, P

J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette flow II: Above threshold case, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 279 (2022), pp.v+135

work page 2022

[7] [6]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Uniform inviscid damping and inviscid limit of the 2D Navier-Stokes equation with Navier boundary conditions, arXiv:2405.19249

arXiv

[8] [8]

Bedrossian, S

J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, F. Wang, Pseudo-Gevrey smoothing for the passive scalar equations near Couette, J. Funct. Anal., 289 (2025), Paper No. 110987, 178 pp

work page 2025