pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01865 · v1 · pith:7NQAQYZSnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 📡 eess.AS · cs.SD

Neural Audio Codec with Adjustable Token Temporal Resolution Using Sampling-Frequency-Independent Convolutional Layers

Tomohiko Nakamura , Wataru Nakata , Kanami Imamura , Yuki Saito This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 05:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS cs.SD
keywords neural audio codectoken temporal resolutionconvolutional layersaudio reconstructionenvironmental soundsdiscrete tokenssampling-frequency-independent layers
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single neural audio codec model can handle multiple token temporal resolutions by deriving resolution-specific convolutional kernels from shared parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that neural audio codecs need not be retrained or switched for each token temporal resolution, since TTR controls the balance between capturing fast sound events and keeping token sequences short. The method treats each TTR as a sampling period and builds the required convolutional kernels on the fly from one shared parameter set while scaling kernel size and stride accordingly. This mechanism is inserted into an existing codec while leaving its quantizer untouched. On environmental sound reconstruction the single model beats a baseline that swaps in separate TTR-specific layers for each resolution.

Core claim

The sampling-frequency-independent convolutional layers enable one NAC to produce tokens at any chosen TTR by generating TTR-dependent kernels from a shared parameter set and adjusting kernel size and stride to match the target sampling period, with the quantizer held fixed.

What carries the argument

sampling-frequency-independent convolutional layers that generate TTR-dependent kernels from a shared parameter set while adjusting kernel size and stride for each TTR

If this is right

  • One trained model suffices for any TTR instead of requiring separate models or layer sets per resolution.
  • The quantizer can remain unchanged across all supported TTRs.
  • Reconstruction quality on environmental sounds exceeds that of a baseline that switches TTR-specific layers.
  • Token sequences can be produced at the resolution that best matches the acoustic content without reloading model weights.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kernel-generation logic could be tested on speech or music to check whether the quality advantage generalizes beyond environmental sounds.
  • Dynamic selection of TTR during inference becomes feasible if the model can switch resolutions without retraining.
  • Training compute drops because only one model needs optimization rather than one model per target TTR.

Load-bearing premise

The convolutional mechanism continues to preserve reconstruction quality when the quantizer stays fixed and the model processes environmental sounds at different token temporal resolutions.

What would settle it

Measure reconstruction metrics on the same environmental sound test set at several TTR values; if the single model underperforms a set of separately trained models at any TTR, the claim does not hold.

read the original abstract

Discrete tokens obtained from neural audio codecs (NACs) have been used as compact representations in audio generation and understanding models. In such token-based systems, token temporal resolution (TTR), defined as the time interval between adjacent token frames, is important because it controls the trade-off between representing rapid acoustic events and reducing token-sequence length. However, most NACs are trained at a single TTR and require separate training for each TTR. This paper proposes a mechanism that enables a single NAC to operate at multiple TTRs using sampling-frequency-independent convolutional layers. The mechanism regards TTR as the sampling period of the token sequence and generates TTR-dependent convolutional kernels from a shared parameter set, while adjusting the kernel size and stride for each TTR. We incorporate the mechanism into Descript Audio Codec, leaving the quantizer unchanged. Experiments on environmental sound reconstruction show that the proposed model outperforms a single-model baseline that switches TTR-specific layers for each TTR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a sampling-frequency-independent convolutional mechanism that allows a single neural audio codec (based on Descript Audio Codec) to operate at multiple token temporal resolutions (TTRs) by generating TTR-dependent kernels from shared parameters while adjusting kernel size and stride; the quantizer remains fixed. Experiments on environmental sound reconstruction are reported to show outperformance versus a baseline that switches TTR-specific layers.

Significance. If the central mechanism preserves encoder latent statistics compatible with the fixed quantizer, the approach could reduce the need for separate NAC models per TTR and improve flexibility in token-based audio pipelines. The shared-parameter design is a clear architectural strength, but the absence of any reported metrics or distribution analyses prevents assessment of whether the result holds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the claim that the proposed model 'outperforms' the baseline on environmental sound reconstruction is stated without any quantitative metrics (e.g., reconstruction error, perceptual scores), error bars, dataset details, or ablation results. This directly undermines evaluation of the central experimental claim.
  2. [Method / Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: no analysis is provided of pre-quantization latent distributions, codebook usage, or perplexity across TTR values. Because the quantizer is left unchanged, evidence that encoder outputs remain statistically compatible when TTR changes is load-bearing for the claim that the mechanism works without quality drop.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the exact TTR values tested and how kernel size/stride are computed from the shared parameters; an equation or pseudocode would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on experimental validation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the claim that the proposed model 'outperforms' the baseline on environmental sound reconstruction is stated without any quantitative metrics (e.g., reconstruction error, perceptual scores), error bars, dataset details, or ablation results. This directly undermines evaluation of the central experimental claim.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support is required to substantiate the outperformance claim. The revised manuscript will include tables with reconstruction metrics (e.g., SI-SDR, Mel-spectrogram distance), perceptual scores where applicable, standard deviations from repeated runs, full dataset specifications (environmental sound corpora, sampling rates, train/test splits), and ablations isolating the effect of the shared-parameter mechanism versus the TTR-specific baseline. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method / Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: no analysis is provided of pre-quantization latent distributions, codebook usage, or perplexity across TTR values. Because the quantizer is left unchanged, evidence that encoder outputs remain statistically compatible when TTR changes is load-bearing for the claim that the mechanism works without quality drop.

    Authors: We concur that compatibility of encoder latents with the fixed quantizer is central. The revision will add: (i) statistical comparisons (means, variances, KL divergence) of pre-quantization latent distributions across TTRs, (ii) codebook usage histograms and entropy, and (iii) perplexity of the quantized sequences, to demonstrate that the sampling-frequency-independent convolutions preserve the necessary statistics without inducing distribution shift. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: architectural mechanism and empirical comparison are independent of fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper introduces a sampling-frequency-independent convolutional mechanism that generates TTR-dependent kernels from shared parameters while adjusting size and stride, then inserts it into the existing Descript Audio Codec with the quantizer held fixed. The central result is an empirical outperformance on environmental-sound reconstruction against an explicit single-model baseline that switches TTR-specific layers. No equations, derivations, or claims reduce any reported quantity to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain. The comparison is external and falsifiable; the mechanism is presented as a direct architectural change rather than a re-derivation of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard properties of convolutional layers and the assumption that TTR can be treated as a sampling period without additional domain-specific constraints. No free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Convolutional layers can be made sampling-frequency-independent by generating kernels from a shared parameter set while adjusting size and stride.
    Invoked when the mechanism is introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5707 in / 1192 out tokens · 20190 ms · 2026-07-03T05:13:32.248497+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION Neural audio codecs (NACs) encode audio signals into discrete to- kens and reconstruct waveforms from them [1]. While conventional codecs such as Opus [2] are primarily designed for audio compres- sion, NACs have gathered attention because their learned tokens can also serve as compact representations for other audio models. For example, NAC ...

  2. [2]

    Neural Audio Codec with Adjustable Token Temporal Resolution Using Sampling-Frequency-Independent Convolutional Layers

    RELA TED WORK 2.1. NAC A typical NAC consists of an encoder, a quantizer, and a decoder. The encoder maps an input waveform into a latent sequence, the quantizer converts this sequence into discrete tokens, and the de- coder reconstructs the waveform from the tokens. SoundStream es- tablished this framework using convolutional encoder–decoder net- works a...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    6HoUS1xGgvSzNYQf6HfFI7D236Q=

    PROPOSED METHOD This section describes the proposed TTR-adjustment mechanism. The mechanism makes the TTR adjustable by using SFI convolu- tional layers and by setting their sampling period, kernel size, and stride according to the target TTR. We first review SFI convolutional layers and then describe the incorporation of this mechanism into DAC as a base...

  4. [4]

    Experimental Setup To evaluate the proposed mechanism, we conducted sound recon- struction experiments on the CochlScene dataset [23]

    EXPERIMENTS 4.1. Experimental Setup To evaluate the proposed mechanism, we conducted sound recon- struction experiments on the CochlScene dataset [23]. This dataset is a crowdsourced environmental sound dataset consisting of monau- ral audio signals recorded in 13 acoustic scenes. Each signal is10 s long and originally sampled at44.1 kHz. The official spl...

  5. [5]

    The mechanism gen- erates TTR-dependent weights from shared trainable parameters and modifies only the layers adjacent to the quantizer

    CONCLUSION In this paper, we proposed a mechanism that enables a single NAC to operate at multiple TTRs using SFI layers. The mechanism gen- erates TTR-dependent weights from shared trainable parameters and modifies only the layers adjacent to the quantizer. Experiments on an environmental sound dataset showed that the proposed model outperformed a single...

  6. [6]

    Discrete audio tokens: More than a survey!,

    P. Mousavi, G. Maimon, A. Moumen, D. Petermann, J. Shi, H. Wu, H. Yang, A. Kuznetsova, A. Ploujnikov, R. Marxer, B. Ramabhadran, B. Elizalde, L. Lugosch, J. Li, C. Subakan, P. Woodland, M. Kim, H.-Y . Lee, S. Watanabe, Y . Adi, and M. Ravanelli, “Discrete audio tokens: More than a survey!,” Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Definition of the Opus audio codec,

    J.-M. Valin, K. V os, and T. B. Terriberry, “Definition of the Opus audio codec,” RFC 6716, Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 2012, Standard specification for the Opus interac- tive audio codec

    2012

  8. [8]

    AudioLM: A language modeling ap- proach to audio generation,

    Z. Borsos, R. Marinier, D. Vincent, E. Kharitonov, O. Pietquin, M. Sharifi, D. Roblek, O. Teboul, D. Grangier, M. Tagliasac- chi, and N. Zeghidour, “AudioLM: A language modeling ap- proach to audio generation,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 31, pp. 2523–2533, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    MusicLM: Generating Music From Text

    A. Agostinelli, T. I. Denk, Z. Borsos, J. Engel, M. Verzetti, A. Caillon, Q. Huang, A. Jansen, A. Roberts, M. Tagliasacchi, M. Sharifi, N. Zeghidour, and C. Frank, “MusicLM: Generat- ing music from text,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2301.11325, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listen

    P. K. Rubenstein, C. Asawaroengchai, D. D. Nguyen, A. Bapna, Z. Borsos, F. de Chaumont Quitry, P. Chen, D. El Badawy, W. Han, E. Kharitonov, H. Muckenhirn, D. Pad- field, J. Qin, D. Rozenberg, T. Sainath, J. Schalkwyk, M. Shar- ifi, M. Tadmor Ramanovich, M. Tagliasacchi, A. Tudor, M. Ve- limirovi´c, D. Vincent, J. Yu, Y . Wang, V . Zayats, N. Zeghidour, Y...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Speech- Tokenizer: Unified speech tokenizer for speech large language models,

    X. Zhang, D. Zhang, S. Li, Y . Zhou, and X. Qiu, “Speech- Tokenizer: Unified speech tokenizer for speech large language models,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    WavTokenizer: An efficient acoustic discrete codec tokenizer for audio language modeling,

    S. Ji, Z. Jiang, W. Wang, Y . Chen, M. Fang, J. Zuo, Q. Yang, X. Cheng, Z. Wang, R. Li, Z. Zhang, X. Yang, R. Huang, Y . Jiang, Q. Chen, S. Zheng, and Z. Zhao, “WavTokenizer: An efficient acoustic discrete codec tokenizer for audio language modeling,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    SemantiCodec: An ultra low bitrate semantic audio codec for general sound,

    H. Liu, X. Xu, Y . Yuan, M. Wu, W. Wang, and M. D. Plumbley, “SemantiCodec: An ultra low bitrate semantic audio codec for general sound,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1448–1461, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    DualCodec: A low-frame-rate, semantically-enhanced neural audio codec for speech generation,

    J. Li, X. Lin, Z. Li, S. Huang, Y . Wang, C. Wang, Z. Zhan, and Z. Wu, “DualCodec: A low-frame-rate, semantically-enhanced neural audio codec for speech generation,” inProc. INTER- SPEECH, 2025, pp. 4883–4887

    2025

  15. [15]

    NanoCodec: To- wards high-quality ultra fast speech LLM inference,

    E. Casanova, P. Neekhara, R. Langman, S. Hussain, S. Ghosh, X. Yang, A. Jukic, J. Li, and B. Ginsburg, “NanoCodec: To- wards high-quality ultra fast speech LLM inference,” inProc. INTERSPEECH, 2025, pp. 5028–5032

    2025

  16. [16]

    FlexiCodec: A dynamic neural audio codec for low frame rates,

    J. Li, Y . Qian, Y . Hu, L. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Lu, M. Thakker, J. Li, S. Zhao, and Z. Wu, “FlexiCodec: A dynamic neural audio codec for low frame rates,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Representations, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Sampling-frequency-independent convolutional layer and its application to audio source separation,

    K. Saito, T. Nakamura, K. Yatabe, and H. Saruwatari, “Sampling-frequency-independent convolutional layer and its application to audio source separation,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Au- dio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 30, pp. 2928–2943, 2022

    2022

  18. [18]

    Neural analog filter for sampling-frequency-independent con- volutional layer,

    K. Imamura, T. Nakamura, K. Yatabe, and H. Saruwatari, “Neural analog filter for sampling-frequency-independent con- volutional layer,”APSIPA Trans. Signal Inf. Process., vol. 13, no. 1, e28, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Stride conversion algorithms for convolutional layers and its application to sampling-frequency-independent deep neural networks,

    K. Imamura, T. Nakamura, N. Takamune, K. Yatabe, and H. Saruwatari, “Stride conversion algorithms for convolutional layers and its application to sampling-frequency-independent deep neural networks,”Signal Process., vol. 242, no. 110420, 2026

    2026

  20. [20]

    High-fidelity audio compression with improved RVQGAN,

    R. Kumar, P. Seetharaman, A. Luebs, I. Kumar, and K. Kumar, “High-fidelity audio compression with improved RVQGAN,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    SoundStream: An end-to-end neural audio codec,

    N. Zeghidour, A. Luebs, A. Omran, J. Skoglund, and M. Tagliasacchi, “SoundStream: An end-to-end neural audio codec,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 30, pp. 495–507, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    High fidelity neural audio compression,

    A. D ´efossez, J. Copet, G. Synnaeve, and Y . Adi, “High fidelity neural audio compression,”Trans. Mach. Learn. Res., 2023

    2023

  23. [23]

    SNAC: Multi-scale neural audio codec,

    H. Siuzdak, F. Gr ¨otschla, and L. A. Lanzend ¨orfer, “SNAC: Multi-scale neural audio codec,” inProc. Audio Imagination, NeurIPS 2024 Workshop, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Un- locking temporal flexibility: Neural speech codec with variable frame rate,

    H. Zhang, Y . Guo, Z. Li, X. Hao, X. Chen, and K. Yu, “Un- locking temporal flexibility: Neural speech codec with variable frame rate,” inProc. INTERSPEECH, 2025, pp. 5003–5007

    2025

  25. [25]

    Neural networks fail to learn periodic functions and how to fix it,

    Z. Liu, T. Hartwig, and M. Ueda, “Neural networks fail to learn periodic functions and how to fix it,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, vol. 33, pp. 1583–1594

    2020

  26. [26]

    Weight normalization: A simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neu- ral networks,

    T. Salimans and D. P. Kingma, “Weight normalization: A simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neu- ral networks,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2016, pp. 901–909

    2016

  27. [27]

    Neu- ral discrete representation learning,

    A. van den Oord, O. Vinyals, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Neu- ral discrete representation learning,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2017, pp. 6309–6318

    2017

  28. [28]

    Cochlscene: Acquisition of acoustic scene data using crowdsourcing,

    I.-Y . Jeong and J. Park, “Cochlscene: Acquisition of acoustic scene data using crowdsourcing,” inProc. Asia-Pacific Signal Inf. Process. Assoc. Annu. Summit Conf., 2022, pp. 17–21

    2022

  29. [29]

    Zimtohrli: An efficient psychoacoustic audio sim- ilarity metric,

    J. Alakuijala, M. Bruse, S. Boukortt, J. M. Coldenhoff, and M. Cernak, “Zimtohrli: An efficient psychoacoustic audio sim- ilarity metric,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.26133, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025