Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 52 references

Kerr nonlinearity, self-injection locking and correlation in a microresonator

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first phase-matched nondegenerate four-wave mixing driven by two counterpropagating, self-injection-locked lasers in a whispering-gallery-mode microresonator, and shows that the two pump lasers become correlated…

desk verdict A plausible new phase-matching geometry for counterpropagating pumps, but the experiment doesn't yet tie the observed sidebands to the predicted process. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09243 v1 pith:7PWQ267N submitted 2025-06-10 physics.optics

Andrey Matsko , Abdelkrim El Amili , Lute Maleki This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords four-wavemixingwhisperinggallerymoderesonatorself-injectionlockingcounterpropagatingpumpsKerrnonlinearityparametricoscillationphasematchingphotonpairgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates a new geometry for four-wave mixing in an optical microresonator: two nondegenerate, counterpropagating pump beams, each self-injection locked to a different mode family of the same whispering-gallery-mode resonator, can be phase-matched to generate a single signal/idler pair. The key is selecting two mode families with different radial quantum numbers p but the same axial quantum number q, so the four-point spatial overlap integral is nonzero even though the pumps counterpropagate. Because the pumps travel in opposite directions, the generated harmonics emerge through spatially separated ports, which is attractive for photon-pair sources. The paper supports this with an experiment using two locked semiconductor lasers on a magnesium-fluoride resonator, observing sidebands in both directions and, above threshold, a transfer of amplitude modulation from one pump laser to the other that disappears below threshold.

What carries the argument

The central object is a pair of whispering-gallery modes from two different mode families of the same resonator, parameterized by azimuthal number $m$, radial number $p$, and axial number $q$; phase matching is evaluated through the four-point spatial overlap integral $\int_V \Psi_i\Psi_j\Psi_k\Psi_l\,dV$. Choosing modes with pairwise-matched azimuthal numbers but different families makes this overlap nonzero for counterpropagating pumps. The second load-bearing mechanism is self-injection locking: resonant Rayleigh backscattering feeds each laser's output back into its own cavity mode, producing a locking coefficient $K$ that enters Eq. (11) and converts the nonlinear cavity response into frequency pulling of the pump difference, which in turn locks the product of pump amplitudes above threshold and transfers modulation between the two lasers.

What would settle it

Tune the two pump lasers to a different pair of locked modes with a different frequency separation and verify that the generated sideband pair still satisfies the predicted mode-family phase-matching relation; if the sideband spacing moves with the pump spacing instead of locking to the selected cavity-mode frequency difference, the claimed phase-matching mechanism is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that nondegenerate four-wave mixing can be phase-matched in a whispering-gallery resonator with two counterpropagating pumps, and that the frequency spacing of the generated harmonics is set by the chosen cavity-mode pair, not by the pump frequency separation. Writing the modes in cylindrical coordinates as $\Psi\sim e^{\pm im\phi}e^{\pm i\int \beta(z)dz}R(\rho(z))$, the paper shows that selecting two mode families with different radial quantum numbers $p$, the same axial quantum number $q$, and pairwise-matched azimuthal numbers $m$ makes the four-point overlap integral in Eq. (4) nonzero, whereas a one-dimensional counterpropagating geometry cannot satisfy the phase-matching condition for strongly nondegenerate frequencies. The paper further shows that self-injection locking of the two pump lasers pulls the pump frequency difference toward the cross-phase-modulation-shifted cavity-mode difference, as expressed in Eq. (11), which stabilizes the product of intracavity pump powers above threshold and produces measurable correlation between the two independent lasers. Experimentally, two self-injection-locked semiconductor lasers separated by 10.7 GHz in a 37 GHz free-spectral-range magnesium-fluoride resonator generate the predicted nondegenerate sidebands in both directions, with the unwanted direction suppressed by roughly an order of magnitude.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental interpretation rests on the assumption that the sidebands seen in the spectra are the particular phase-matched mode pair selected by the theory, and not a different four-wave-mixing process in the same resonator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two counterpropagating pumps locked to different mode families produce bright, spectrally distinct signal and idler sidebands whose frequency difference is set by the cavity mode pair, not by the pump separation.
  • The generated harmonics emerge from the resonator through physically separate output ports, so photon routing for a pair source needs no additional filters or circulators.
  • When the parametric oscillation is above threshold, the two pump lasers become correlated: modulating one laser's current modulates the other's output, and this transfer vanishes below threshold.
  • Self-injection locking acts as an active participant in the nonlinear process: it pulls the pump frequency difference toward the nonlinear cavity-mode difference, stabilizing the product of intracavity pump powers.
  • Because the phase matching selects a single mode pair with no competing signal pair, the process yields a canonical two-harmonic four-wave-mixing output rather than a multi-harmonic comb.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unstated consequence of the frequency-pulling relation is that the same cavity could transfer modulation or timing signals from one free-running laser to another without direct optical injection, which the correlation measurement already hints at.
  • A testable extension is to vary the locked pump separation across several pairs of modes and check whether the sideband separation stays pinned to the cavity-mode pair, as the phase-matching picture predicts, rather than following the pumps.
  • The observed two-way emission with roughly tenfold suppression suggests that residual Rayleigh scattering couples the two directions; quantifying that coupling could turn the asymmetry into a tuning knob for unidirectional emission.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and experimentally claims a nondegenerate four-wave mixing (FWM) process in a whispering-gallery-mode resonator pumped by two counterpropagating, self-injection-locked semiconductor lasers locked to two different mode families. The theory section presents phase-matching conditions based on four-point overlap integrals and claims that a specific pair of modes is uniquely phase-matched. It then states threshold and frequency-pulling formulas for the parametric oscillation and predicts a correlation between the two pump lasers. The experimental section shows optical spectra (Fig. 3) with sidebands generated in both directions and an order-of-magnitude asymmetry, plus modulation-transfer measurements (Fig. 4) interpreted as FWM-induced correlation between the pumps. The authors conclude that this is the first demonstration of nondegenerate FWM with two nondegenerate counterpropagating pumps and suggest utility for entangled-photon-pair sources.

Significance. If the central claim were fully validated, the counterpropagating-pump geometry would be a useful new configuration for Kerr FWM, because it offers spatial separation of the generated harmonics without external filters. The use of two self-injection-locked lasers to two distinct modes is also potentially practical for integrated photonics. However, the experimental validation is incomplete: the spectra are not frequency-calibrated, the predicted mode pair is not identified from measured frequencies, and the observed bidirectional emission is in tension with the predicted directionality. The theoretical core is also condensed, with several central equations stated without derivation. The concept is promising, but the paper in its current form does not provide the evidence needed to establish the claimed effect.

major comments (5)
  1. [Two-photon oscillation, Fig. 3] The experimental identification of the generated sidebands is incomplete. The paper does not report the measured frequencies or wavelength separations of the pump and sideband lines, so the reader cannot verify the energy-conservation condition ωp1 + ωp2 = ωs1 + ωs2 or the claim that the sideband frequency difference is not related to the pump frequency difference. Without this identification, the observed lines could be degenerate FWM, Raman lasing, or another parametric process, and the claimed validation of the phase-matching condition does not land. Please provide the OSA traces with a calibrated frequency axis and the resonator mode spectrum, and explicitly assign the observed lines to the predicted mode pair.
  2. [Phase matching conditions, 'there are no other signal pairs'] The assertion that 'there are no other signal pairs that can compete with the identified signal pair' is unsupported. No exhaustive search over the mode families, no computed four-point overlap integrals, and no threshold comparison with alternative pairs are shown. Since the uniqueness of the identified mode pair is load-bearing for the interpretation of the experiment, please provide the mode-search methodology and the numerical values of the overlap integrals for the candidate pairs.
  3. [Two-photon oscillation, Fig. 3 caption] The predicted directionality is contradicted by the observation: the text states that the sideband emission 'should ideally exhibit a well-defined directionality', yet the measured emission appears in both directions with a 'significant asymmetry' that is attributed to Rayleigh scattering. The Rayleigh-scattering rate is not quantified, and no model is provided to show that it explains the observed suppression of roughly an order of magnitude. Please quantify the scattering contribution and show that it is consistent with the observed bidirectional pattern.
  4. [Kerr induced laser correlation, Eqs. (9)-(11)] Equations (9), (10), and (11) are central to the theoretical claims but are introduced without derivation. In particular, Eq. (11) imports the self-injection-locking pulling formula from Ref. 15, but the coefficient K is not defined in this paper, and the modifications due to the nonlinear frequency shifts are not derived. Please provide a derivation or an explicit appendix that defines all variables and justifies each step, so that the threshold condition and the frequency-locking claim can be assessed.
  5. [Laser power correlation induced by the SIL, Fig. 4] The claim of FWM-induced correlation between the two pump lasers is based on modulation-transfer measurements, but the figures show no quantitative modulation depths, noise floors, or calibration. The text states that below threshold modulation of laser #1 had 'almost no effect' on laser #2, yet no number or statistical comparison is given. Please report quantitative modulation depths with uncertainties and address possible crosstalk paths (electrical, thermal, or through shared resonator heating) that could produce the observed transfer.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Results, near Eq. (5)] The phrase 'wave lectors' should be 'wave vectors'.
  2. [Introduction] 'Multiple experiments have demonstrating the use of two lasers' should be 'Multiple experiments have demonstrated the use of two lasers'.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The phrase 'thevalues of lasers’ power' contains a typo and should read 'the values of the lasers’ powers'.
  4. [Phase matching conditions, text near Fig. 2] The text refers to 'the mode structure shown in Fig. (1a)' and 'illustrated in Fig. (1b)', but the mode configuration and the MgF2 spectrum appear to be in Fig. 2, not Fig. 1. Please check and correct the figure references.
  5. [Kerr induced laser correlation, Eq. (11)] Equation (11) contains a stray '+' at the end of the first displayed line; the formatting should be cleaned up.
  6. [Fig. 3] The spectra in Fig. 3 have no frequency axis, wavelength axis, or line annotations. Adding these would substantially improve the reader's ability to verify the claimed effect.
  7. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion emphasize quantum correlations and entangled photon pairs, but the paper reports only classical optical spectra and amplitude-modulation transfer. Please temper the quantum claims or clearly state that quantum correlation measurements are left for future work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase-matching theory is self-contained and the experimental observations are independent of any fitted parameter.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claim, phase-matched nondegenerate four-wave mixing with two counterpropagating pumps in different mode families, is derived from energy conservation (Eqs. 1-2), the overlap-integral phase-matching criterion (Eq. 4), and a specific construction of azimuthal mode quantum numbers across two mode families. None of these inputs is defined in terms of the observed sidebands. The experimental section reports sideband generation and pump-modulation transfer, but no parameter is fitted to those data; no theoretical curve is adjusted to match Fig. 3. Equation (11), for self-injection-locking frequency pulling, is imported from the literature (ref. 15), but that reference is not authored by the present paper's authors, and the correlation claim is tested independently through amplitude-modulation transfer rather than by re-deriving Eq. (11) from the data. The unproved assertion that no other signal pair can compete, and the absence of measured sideband frequencies, weaken the experimental identification, but those are evidence-completeness concerns, not circular reductions: neither the phase-matching condition nor the predicted correlation depends on the measured spectra for its definition. Self-citations in the paper (e.g., refs. 6, 12, 16, 39, and 43) serve as background or as prior devices and are not load-bearing for the new phase-matching geometry or for the claimed first observations. The derivation is therefore self-contained, and the experimental validation is external to the theory's construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard FWM theory, a specific but unproven assertion about mode competition, and an imported SIL formula. No new physical entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted to the data, but the mode-selection step and the K value are not independently verified.

free parameters (1)
  • Self-injection locking coefficient K = not measured
    Appears in Eq. (11); the pump-frequency pulling and the resulting power correlation assume K is large, but K is not measured or fitted in the experiment.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard four-wave mixing energy conservation and phase-matching requirements, Eqs. (1) and (4) to (6).
    Textbook conditions assumed throughout the 'Phase matching conditions' section.
  • domain assumption Intracavity fields can be written as Ej = Ψj(r)cj(t) and the nonlinear interaction is governed by the four-point overlap integral.
    Eqs. (3) and (4); standard for WGM resonators but not proven in the paper.
  • domain assumption The two lasers are locked such that Eq. (11), with a constant self-injection coefficient K, describes the pump frequency difference.
    Imported from ref [15]; no derivation or measurement of K is given in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The selected mode families have no competing signal pairs for the FWM process.
    Explicit assertion in the Results that 'there are no other signal pairs that can compete with the identified signal pair', without showing the exhaustive search or overlap integrals.
  • standard math The mode spectrum of the MgF2 resonator is described by the cylindrical model of Eq. (8) with quantum numbers (m,p,q).
    Cites refs [49,50]; used to construct Fig. 2 and to justify the phase-matched mode pair.
  • domain assumption Zero internal loss and a symmetric coupling rate γ0 for the cavity modes in deriving Eq. (9).
    Stated explicitly: the optical modes are assumed to have zero internal loss and coupling rate γ0; this idealized limit may not hold in the experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kerr nonlinearity, self-injection locking and correlation in a microresonator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7PWQ267N

@misc{pith2026250609243,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kerr nonlinearity, self-injection locking and correlation in a microresonator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7PWQ267N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09243}
}
read the original abstract

Production of entangled photon pairs is important in secure communication systems, quantum computing, and fundamental physics experiments. Achieving efficient generation of such photon pairs with low-loss parametric oscillators is a key objective in advancing integrated quantum technologies. However, spatially separating the generated photons while preserving their entanglement represents a significant technical challenge. In this work, we demonstrate nonlinear generation of correlated optical harmonics based on non-degenerate four-wave mixing with an optimally pumped optical microcavity with Kerr nonlinearity. The phase matching of the process is achieved with self-injection locked lasers producing parametric oscillation while locked to two different modes of the microresonator. This condition is reminiscent of slow-light technique developed for coherent atomic systems. The experimental design, utilizing counterpropagating light from two self-injection locked lasers, also effectively addresses the challenge of spatial separation of the generated harmonics. We validate the theoretical predictions using two self-injection locked semiconductor lasers integrated with a crystalline whispering gallery mode resonator with optimized spectral structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09243 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical resonators with whispering gallery modes I: basics,

    Matsko, A.B. and Ilchenko, V.S., "Optical resonators with whispering gallery modes I: basics," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron, 12(3), 3-14 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Spherical whispering‐gallery‐mode microresonators,

    Chiasera, A., Dumeige, Y., Feron, P., Ferrari, M., Jestin, Y., Nunzi Conti, G., Pelli, S., Soria, S. and Righini, G.C., "Spherical whispering‐gallery‐mode microresonators," Laser & Photonics Reviews, 4(3), pp.457-482 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Ultimate Q of optical microsphere resonators,

    Gorodetsky, M.L., Savchenkov, A.A. and Ilchenko, V.S., "Ultimate Q of optical microsphere resonators," Optics Letters, 21(7), 453-455 (1996)

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Optical resonators with ten million finesse,

    Savchenkov, A.A., Matsko, A.B., Ilchenko, V.S. and Maleki, L., "Optical resonators with ten million finesse," Optics Express, 15(11), pp.6768-6773 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator,

    Del’Haye, P., Schliesser, A., Arcizet, O., Wilken, T., Holzwarth, R. and Kippenberg, T.J., "Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator," Nature, 450(7173), 1214-1217 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Tunable optical frequency comb with a crystalline whispering gallery mode resonator,

    Savchenkov, A.A., Matsko, A.B., Ilchenko, V.S., Solomatine, I., Seidel, D. and Maleki, L., "Tunable optical frequency comb with a crystalline whispering gallery mode resonator," Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(9), art. no. 093902 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    and Diddams, S.A., 2011

    Kippenberg, T.J., Holzwarth, R. and Diddams, S.A., 2011. Microresonator-based optical frequency combs. Science, 332(6029), pp.555-559 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Whispering-gallery-moderesonator- based ultranarrow linewidth external-cavity semiconductor laser,

    Liang, W., Ilchenko, V. S., Savchenkov, A. A., Matsko, A. B., Seidel, D., and Maleki, L., "Whispering-gallery-moderesonator- based ultranarrow linewidth external-cavity semiconductor laser," Opt. Lett. 35, 2822 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Reducing negative resistance oscillator noise by self injection,

    Ohta, T. and Murakami, K., "Reducing negative resistance oscillator noise by self injection," Electron. Commun. Jpn. 51-B, 80 (1968)

    1968

  2. [10]

    Frequency stabilization of semiconductor lasers by resonant optical feedback,

    Dahmani, B., Hollberg, L., and Drullinger, R., "Frequency stabilization of semiconductor lasers by resonant optical feedback," Opt. Lett. 12, 876 (1987)

    1987

  3. [11]

    Rayleigh scattering in high-Q microspheres,

    Gorodetsky, M. L., Pryamikov, A. D., and Ilchenko, V. S., "Rayleigh scattering in high-Q microspheres," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17, 1051 (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    Ultralow noise miniature external cavity semiconductor laser,

    Liang, W., Ilchenko, V., Eliyahu, D., Savchenkov, A. A., Matsko, A. B., Seidel, D., and Maleki, L., "Ultralow noise miniature external cavity semiconductor laser," Nat. Commun. 6, 7371 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Dynamics of soliton self-injection locking in optical microresonators,

    Voloshin, A. S., Kondratiev, N. M., Lihachev, G. V., Liu, J., Lobanov, V. E., Dmitriev, N. Y., Weng, W., Kippenberg, T.J., and Bilenko, I. A., "Dynamics of soliton self-injection locking in optical microresonators," Nature Communications, 12(1), art. no. 235 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    The optoelectronic oscillator,

    Maleki, L., "The optoelectronic oscillator," Nature Photonics, 5(12), 728-730 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Recent advances in laser self-injection locking to high-Q microresonators,

    Kondratiev, N.M., Lobanov, V.E., Shitikov, A.E., Galiev, R.R., Chermoshentsev, D.A., Dmitriev, N.Y., Danilin, A.N., Lonshakov, E.A., Min’kov, K.N., Sokol, D.M. and Cordette, S.J., Luo, Y.-H., Liang, W., Liu, J., and Bilenko, I. A., "Recent advances in laser self-injection lock...

    2023

  8. [16]

    High spectral purity Kerr frequency comb radio frequency photonic oscillator,

    Liang, W., Eliyahu, D., Ilchenko, V.S., Savchenkov, A.A., Matsko, A.B., Seidel, D. and Maleki, L., "High spectral purity Kerr frequency comb radio frequency photonic oscillator," Nature Communications, 6(1), art. no. 7957 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Integrated turnkey soliton microcombs,

    Shen, B., Chang, L., Liu, J., Wang, H., Yang, Q.F., Xiang, C., Wang, R.N., He, J., Liu, T., Xie, W. Guo, J., Kinghorn, D., Wu, L., Ji, Q.-X., Kippenberg, T. J., Vahala, K., Bowers, J. E., "Integrated turnkey soliton microcombs," Nature, 582(7812), pp.365-369 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Wavelength-division multiplexing communications using integrated soliton microcomb laser source,

    Geng, Y., Xiao, Y., Bai, Q., Han, X., Dong, W., Wang, W., Xue, J., Yao, B., Deng, G., Zhou, Q. and Qiu, K., "Wavelength-division multiplexing communications using integrated soliton microcomb laser source," Opt. Lett. 47(23), pp.6129-6132 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Frequency comb spectroscopy,

    Picque, N. and Hänsch, T.W.,"Frequency comb spectroscopy," Nature Photonics, 13(3), pp.146-157 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Application of a self-injection locked cyan laser for barium ion cooling and spectroscopy,

    Savchenkov, A.A., Christensen, J.E., Hucul, D., Campbell, W.C., Hudson, E.R., Williams, S. and Matsko, A.B., "Application of a self-injection locked cyan laser for barium ion cooling and spectroscopy," Scientific Reports, 10(1), p.16494 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coherence,

    Voloshin, A., Siddharth, A., Bianconi, S., Attanasio, A., Bancora, A., Shadymov, V., Leni, S., Wang, R.N., Riemensberger, J., Bhave, S.A. and Kippenberg, T.J., "Monolithic piezoelectrically tunable hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coherence," arXiv preprint arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hybrid integrated ultra-low linewidth coil stabilized isolator-free widely tunable external cavity laser,

    Heim, D.A., Bose, D., Liu, K., Isichenko, A. and Blumenthal, D.J., "Hybrid integrated ultra-low linewidth coil stabilized isolator-free widely tunable external cavity laser," arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15010 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    and Bowers, J.E., Integrated optical frequency comb technologies

    Chang, L., Liu, S. and Bowers, J.E., Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nature Photonics, 16(2), 95-108 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Bichromatically pumped microresonator frequency combs,

    Hansson, T. and Wabnitz, S., “Bichromatically pumped microresonator frequency combs,” Phys. Rev. A, 90(1), 013811 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    and Hu, H., “Dual-pump Kerr micro-cavity optical frequency comb with varying FSR spacing

    Wang, W., Chu, S.T., Little, B.E., Pasquazi, A., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, W., Wang, L., Hu, X., Wang, G. and Hu, H., “Dual-pump Kerr micro-cavity optical frequency comb with varying FSR spacing. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 28501 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Theoretical study on dual-comb generation and soliton trapping in a single microresonator with orthogonally polarized dual pumping,

    Suzuki, R., Fujii, S., Hori, A. and Tanabe, T., “Theoretical study on dual-comb generation and soliton trapping in a single microresonator with orthogonally polarized dual pumping,” IEEE Photonics J. 11(1), pp.1-11 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    All-optical dissipative discrete time crystals,

    Taheri, H., Matsko, A.B., Maleki, L. and Sacha, K., “All-optical dissipative discrete time crystals,” Nature Communications, 13(1), 848 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Sideband injection locking in microresonator frequency combs,

    Wildi, T., Ulanov, A., Englebert, N., Voumard, T. and Herr, T., “Sideband injection locking in microresonator frequency combs,” APL photonics, 8(12), 120801 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Parametrically driven pure-Kerr temporal solitons in a chip-integrated microcavity,

    Moille, G., Leonhardt, M., Paligora, D., Englebert, N., Leo, F., Fatome, J., Srinivasan, K. and Erkintalo, M., “Parametrically driven pure-Kerr temporal solitons in a chip-integrated microcavity,” Nature Photonics 18(6), pp.617-624 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Simultaneous self-injection locking of two VCSELs to a single whispering-gallery-mode microcavity,

    Jiang, L., Shi, L., Luo, J., Gao, Q., Bai, M., Lan, T., Iroegbu, P. I., Dang, L., Huang, L., Zhu, T., “Simultaneous self-injection locking of two VCSELs to a single whispering-gallery-mode microcavity,” Opt. Express 29(23), 37845–37851 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Dual-laser self-injection locking to an integrated microresonator

    Chermoshentsev, D.A., Shitikov, A.E., Lonshakov, E.A., Grechko, G.V., Sazhina, E.A., Kondratiev, N.M., Masalov, A.V., Bilenko, I.A., Lvovsky, A.I. and Ulanov, A.E., “Dual-laser self-injection locking to an integrated microresonator.” Optics Express, 30(10), pp.17094-17105 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Quantum dynamics of Kerr optical frequency combs below and above threshold: Spontaneous four-wave mixing, entanglement, and squeezed states of light,

    Chembo, Y.K., "Quantum dynamics of Kerr optical frequency combs below and above threshold: Spontaneous four-wave mixing, entanglement, and squeezed states of light," Physical Review A, 93(3), 033820 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Near-degenerate quadrature-squeezed vacuum generation on a silicon-nitride chip,

    Zhao, Y., Okawachi, Y., Jang, J.K., Ji, X., Lipson, M. and Gaeta, A.L., “Near-degenerate quadrature-squeezed vacuum generation on a silicon-nitride chip,” Physical Review Letters, 124(19), 193601 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    and Gaeta, A.L., 2015

    Okawachi, Y., Yu, M., Luke, K., Carvalho, D.O., Ramelow, S., Farsi, A., Lipson, M. and Gaeta, A.L., 2015. Dual-pumped degenerate Kerr oscillator in a silicon nitride microresonator. Optics letters, 40(22), pp.5267-5270 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Numerical simulation and temporal characterization of dual-pumped microring-resonator-based optical frequency combs,

    Hu, X., Wang, W., Wang, L., Zhang, W., Wang, Y. and Zhao, W., “Numerical simulation and temporal characterization of dual-pumped microring-resonator-based optical frequency combs,” Photonics Research, 5(3), pp.207-211, (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Degenerate squeezing in a dual-pumped integrated microresonator: Parasitic processes and their suppression,

    Seifoory, H., Vernon, Z., Mahler, D.H., Menotti, M., Zhang, Y. and Sipe, J.E., “Degenerate squeezing in a dual-pumped integrated microresonator: Parasitic processes and their suppression,” Physical Review A, 105(3), p.033524 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Photonic crystal optical parametric oscillator,

    Marty, G., Combrie, S. , Raineri, F., and De Rossi, A., “Photonic crystal optical parametric oscillator,” Nature Photon., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 53–58 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    and Lipson, M., 2015

    Dutt, A., Luke, K., Manipatruni, S., Gaeta, A.L., Nussenzveig, P. and Lipson, M., 2015. On-chip optical squeezing. Physical Review Applied, 3(4), 044005 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    and Maleki, L., 2016

    Matsko, A.B., Savchenkov, A.A., Huang, S.W. and Maleki, L., 2016. Clustered frequency comb. Optics Letters, 41(21), pp.5102-5105 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Soliton bursts and deterministic dissipative Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted microcavities,

    Zhou, H., Geng, Y., Cui, W., Huang, S.W., Zhou, Q., Qiu, K. and Wei Wong, C., “Soliton bursts and deterministic dissipative Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted microcavities,” Light: Science & Applications, 8(1), p.50 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Symmetry breaking of counter-propagating light in a nonlinear resonator,

    Del Bino, L., Silver, J.M., Stebbings, S.L. and Del'Haye, P., “Symmetry breaking of counter-propagating light in a nonlinear resonator,” Scientific Reports, 7(1), p.43142 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Observation of energy oscillation between strongly-coupled counter-propagating ultra-high Q whispering gallery modes,

    Yoshiki, W., Chen-Jinnai, A., Tetsumoto, T. and Tanabe, T., “Observation of energy oscillation between strongly-coupled counter-propagating ultra-high Q whispering gallery modes,” Optics Express, 23(24), pp.30851-30860 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Bose–Hubbard hopping due to resonant Rayleigh scattering,

    Matsko, A. B., and Maleki, L., "Bose–Hubbard hopping due to resonant Rayleigh scattering," Opt. Lett. 42, 4764-4767 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Integrated photon pairs source based on counter-propagating spontaneous four wave mixing in a silicon nitride microring resonator,

    Rodríguez Becerra, G.J., Durán Gómez, J.S.S., Tavares Ramírez, P.M.C., Ramírez Alarcón, R., Gómez Robles, M. and Salas-Montiel, R., “Integrated photon pairs source based on counter-propagating spontaneous four wave mixing in a silicon nitride microring resonator,”Applied Optic...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Nondegenerate parametric self-oscillation via multiwave mixing in coherent atomic media,

    Zibrov, A.S., Lukin, M.D. and Scully, M.O., "Nondegenerate parametric self-oscillation via multiwave mixing in coherent atomic media," Physical Review Letters, 83(20), 4049 (1999)

    1999

  38. [46]

    Interference-induced quantum squeezing enhancement in a two-beam phase-sensitive amplifier,

    Liu, S., Lou, Y. and Jing, J., "Interference-induced quantum squeezing enhancement in a two-beam phase-sensitive amplifier," Physical Review Letters, 123(11), 113602 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Strong low-frequency quantum correlations from a four-wave-mixing amplifier,

    McCormick, C.F., Marino, A.M., Boyer, V. and Lett, P.D., "Strong low-frequency quantum correlations from a four-wave-mixing amplifier," Physical Review A, 78(4), 043816 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    Quantum correlated light beams from nondegenerate four-wave mixing in an atomic vapor: the D1 and D2 lines of 85Rb and 87Rb,

    Pooser, R. C., Marino, A. M., Boyer, V., Jones, K. M., Lett, P. D., “Quantum correlated light beams from nondegenerate four-wave mixing in an atomic vapor: the D1 and D2 lines of 85Rb and 87Rb,” Opt. Express, Vol. 17, No. 19, 16722 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Whispering-gallery bottle microcavities: the three-dimensional etalon,

    Sumetsky, M., “Whispering-gallery bottle microcavities: the three-dimensional etalon,” Opt. Lett. 29, 8–10 (2004)

    2004

  42. [50]

    Analytical estimates of eigenfrequencies, dispersion, and field distribution in whispering gallery resonators,

    Demchenko, Y. A., Gorodetsky, M. L., "Analytical estimates of eigenfrequencies, dispersion, and field distribution in whispering gallery resonators," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 3056-3063 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Direct observation of stopped light in a whispering-gallery-mode microresonator,

    Savchenkov, A.A., Matsko, A.B., Ilchenko, V.S., Strekalov, D. and Maleki, L., "Direct observation of stopped light in a whispering-gallery-mode microresonator," Physical Review A 76(2), 023816 (2007)

    2007

  44. [52]

    Threshold and linewidth of a mirrorless parametric oscillator,

    Fleischhauer, M., Lukin, M.D., Matsko, A.B. and Scully, M.O., "Threshold and linewidth of a mirrorless parametric oscillator," Physical Review Letters, 84(16), 3558 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.