Dynamics of Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations

Alexandra Neamtu; Christian Kuehn

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Dynamics of Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that the right solution concept for an SPDE is dictated by the roughness of its noise, and that pathwise and rough-path methods now cover quasilinear equations and multiplicative fractional noise, enabling…

desk verdict A useful survey of SPDE solution theory and dynamics with a solid classical core, but Section 3.2 prints an incorrect large-deviation rate function that undermines the metastability discussion, and the bibliography conflates two of the authors' own preprints under one arXiv identifier. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09177 v1 pith:7Q7VJXKY submitted 2019-08-24 math.PR math.DS

Christian Kuehn , Alexandra Neamtu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.DS MSC 60H1537H0535R6060G22

keywords stochasticpartialdifferentialequationsreaction-diffusionsolutiontheoryroughpathsrandomdynamicalsystemscentermanifoldsattractorsmetastability

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a survey, and its pith is a map: each type of stochastic forcing—additive, multiplicative, fractional, space-time white—selects a solution concept, and the choice of concept determines which dynamical tools can be applied. For semilinear equations the classical Itô mild, weak, and variational theories are mutually consistent; for quasilinear equations the paper reports a pathwise mild solution theory; for rough multiplicative noise it reports rough-path solutions and a local center-manifold theorem. The survey then connects these solution theories to stability, metastability, random invariant manifolds, and random attractors. A sympathetic reader takes this as a working roadmap: if the noise is additive or linear multiplicative, reduce to a random PDE and use random dynamical systems; if the noise is rough, use pathwise or rough-path methods; if the equation is singular, renormalize with regularity structures.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a sequence of named objects: metric dynamical systems with the Wiener shift, the cocycle property that makes a solution map a random dynamical system, pathwise mild solutions defined through a generalized stochastic convolution (Definition 2.14), rough-path solutions encoded by a path component $u$ and an area component $z$, and the Lyapunov-Perron map whose fixed point is the graph of the center manifold. For quasilinear equations the load-bearing identity is the variation-of-constants formula (2.19); for rough equations it is the pair of equations (2.32)-(2.33), built from the sewing lemma. Regularity structures, built from abstract symbols with parabolic homogeneity, play the same role for singular SPDEs.

What would settle it

Compute the small-noise large-deviation rate function for the Allen-Cahn SPDE (3.12) on a transition path between the two stable constant states: the displayed $F_{[0,T]}(\gamma) = \frac{1}{2}\int_0^T \int_{\mathbb{S}^1} |\partial_t \gamma(t,x)|^2 \, dx \, dt$ has an infimum of order $1/T$, whereas the cited sharp exit-time asymptotics require a barrier-height action independent of $T$, so a direct check of whether the printed LDP reproduces those asymptotics would settle the matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is organizational: the correct solution theory for an SPDE is forced by the regularity of its noise, and the resulting map extends far enough to cover quasilinear and rough equations. For semilinear SPDEs with Lipschitz coefficients, the Itô-based mild, weak, and variational notions agree under the stated conditions (Theorems 2.8 and 2.13). For quasilinear SPDEs whose linear part is a sectorial random operator depending on the solution, an adapted Itô formulation fails because the evolution operator is not future-measurable, and the paper reports a unique local pathwise mild solution (Theorem 2.15). For multiplicative fractional noise with Hurst index in $(1/3,1/2]$, the paper presents a unique local rough-path solution pair $(u,z)$ (Theorem 2.17). On the dynamical side, it reports that pathwise and rough-path methods turn the SPDE into a random dynamical system and yield a local random center manifold (Theorem 3.15), while additive and linear multiplicative noise admit random attractors through reduction to random PDEs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the results reported as established theorems, especially the quasilinear pathwise mild solution theorem and the rough center-manifold theorem, are correct and traceable to the cited sources.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For semilinear SPDEs with Lipschitz coefficients, mild and variational solutions coincide, so dynamical results proved in one setting transfer to the other.
Quasilinear SPDEs with sectorial, Lipschitz-in-$u$ operators admit local pathwise mild solutions, opening cross-diffusion population models to the random-dynamical-systems toolbox.
SPDEs driven by fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index in $(1/3,1/2]$ and smooth multiplicative diffusion have unique local rough-path solutions, and the solution map is a genuine random dynamical system.
Under a spectral gap between center and stable directions, rough SPDEs have a local random center manifold, so finite-dimensional stochastic bifurcation analysis becomes possible.
For additive and linear multiplicative noise, pullback random attractors exist whenever the reduced random PDE has an absorbing compact set.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the reported rough-path center-manifold theorem extends to stable and unstable manifolds, the discrete-time Lyapunov-Perron scheme would also provide a multiplicative ergodic theorem for fractional-noise SPDEs, something the survey lists as open.
The large-deviation discussion suggests a check: the displayed rate function for the Allen-Cahn SPDE omits the drift, so the printed formula alone would not produce the barrier-dependent metastability asymptotics attributed to the cited literature; a corrected rate function would make that section self-contained.
The claimed absence of general random-attractor results for nonlinear multiplicative noise is likely a temporary state: the pathwise random dynamical system from rough-path solutions supplies the cocycle, and the usual compactness estimates should carry over once a suitable absorbing set is found.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I read the survey, and the reader's take mostly matches mine, with one caveat: the large-deviation issue in Section 3.2 is not just a localized typo. The displayed rate function F[0,T](γ) = (1/2)∫∫|∂tγ|^2 dx dt is the rate function for pure additive noise with no drift. For the Allen-Cahn equation (3.12), the Freidlin–Wentzell rate function must contain the deterministic drift: roughly (1/2)∫∫|∂tγ − (∂x^2γ + γ − γ^3)|^2 dx dt. As printed, the minimal cost of a transition from u ≡ −1 to u ≡ +1 over time horizon T is 2/T, which tends to zero as T grows. The paragraph explicitly uses this F to conclude that exit probabilities are exponentially small and to invoke the Kramers-type metastability asymptotics of [18]. That conclusion does not follow from the formula shown. This is a load-bearing error in a section advertised as covering metastability, one of the paper's central dynamical topics. It is fixable, but it must be fixed before the survey is used as a reference.

The classical core of the survey is genuinely good. Sections 2.1–2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 3.1, and most of 3.2 and 3.4 report standard results with mostly correct attributions. The didactic organization is a real service: a graduate student coming from deterministic PDEs can use this to get a map of mild, weak, strong, martingale, and variational solutions, the random field approach, rough paths, and regularity structures without drowning in the primary literature. The worked examples—especially Example 3.14 on the center manifold approximation—are helpful and correctly executed. The paper is honest about being a survey; the abstract says so and the content matches.

Two smaller issues are worth noting. The reference list assigns the same arXiv number, 1802.10016, to both [123] (pathwise mild solutions for quasilinear SPDEs) and [124] (rough center manifolds). That makes one of the two preprints effectively unlocatable from the bibliography. And Theorem 3.15, presented as an established result, rests on an arXiv preprint; the survey does give proof sketches, so I would not call it a fatal flaw, but the identifier conflation makes verification harder. The assertion in Remark 1 of Section 3.4 that no general random-attractor results exist for nonlinear multiplicative noise is a knowledge claim the survey cannot fully verify; the authors do cite [22] and [79] as partial exceptions, so this is a reasonable best-knowledge statement rather than a fabricated gap.

On the citation pattern: the authors cite themselves heavily in the recent-development sections, which is expected when they are among the few people working on rough-path dynamics and quasilinear SPDEs in this direction. Self-citation alone is not the problem here; the bibliography error is.

Who is this for? A wide community, as the abstract says. A reader who wants a readable map of solution concepts and dynamical tools for SPDEs will get real value from the classical sections and the bibliography, once the reference list is corrected. The recent-development sections are useful as pointers but should be treated as preprints-in-progress rather than settled theory.

Recommendation: yes, send this to a serious referee. A referee who knows SPDE dynamics can check the classical core quickly and will come back with a focused list of corrections, centered on Section 3.2 and the bibliography. The survey deserves that referee time. I would not cite it in my own work until the rate function is corrected and the preprint identifiers are disambiguated.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of solution theory and dynamical systems for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations. It reviews classical Itô-type mild, weak, strong, martingale, and variational solution concepts; quasilinear pathwise mild solutions; Walsh-type random field solutions; rough-path mild solutions for fractional noise; and regularity-structure renormalized solutions. On the dynamics side, it discusses random dynamical systems, stability concepts, large deviations and metastability, random invariant manifolds, and random pullback attractors, including recent results of the authors. The survey is intended as an accessible reference for a broad audience and is organized largely by solution-theoretic framework and by dynamical quantity.

Significance. If the accuracy issues identified below are corrected, the paper would be a useful survey that collects many recent developments in one place. Its classical sections (2.1–2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 3.1, 3.4) report standard material with generally correct attributions, and it gives a readable account of rough-path and quasilinear methods that are not always covered in survey form. The authors are also explicit about which results are their own recent work and provide proof sketches for these items. The main value of the paper is therefore bibliographic and expository; its reliability depends on the correctness of the statements and references it reports.

major comments (2)

[Section 3.2 and references [123], [124]] The large-deviation statement for the Allen-Cahn SPDE (3.12) is incorrect as printed. The displayed rate function F[0,T](γ) = (1/2)∫_0^T∫_{S^1}|∂_t γ|^2 dx dt is the rate function for a pure additive-noise process with no drift, whereas for du = [∂_x^2 u + u − u^3] dt + √(2ε) dW_Id the Freidlin–Wentzell rate function should contain the full deterministic drift, i.e. (1/2)∫_0^T∫_{S^1}|∂_t γ − (∂_x^2 γ + γ − γ^3)|^2 dx dt (up to the usual spatial regularity conventions). This is not a cosmetic issue: with the printed rate function, the minimal cost of a transition from u ≡ −1 to u ≡ +1 over a time horizon T is 2/T (attained by the linear interpolation on S^1), which tends to zero as T → ∞, so the exit probabilities would not be exponentially small in 1/ε with a fixed, T-independent exponent. The paragraph explicitly uses this F to conclude that metastability occurs and to connect to the sharp exit-time asymptotics of [18, 15]. The displayed formula must be corrected and the subsequent discussion reworded accordingly.
[Section 2.4, proof sketch after Theorem 2.15] The bibliography lists the same arXiv identifier, 1802.10016, for both [123] and [124], although they are cited as two distinct sources supporting different results: Theorem 2.15 (pathwise mild solutions for quasilinear SPDEs) is attributed to [123], and Theorem 3.15 (rough center manifolds) is attributed to [124]. As a survey whose central value is trustworthy attribution, the paper must give distinct, locatable references for these two results, or explicitly state that they are two papers sharing an identifier but distinguish them by title and version. Without this, the reader cannot verify either theorem from the reference list.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.3, paragraph after Eq. (3.15)–(3.16)] The displayed solution formula in the proof sketch contains an apparent typo: it reads −∫_0^t A_v(s)U^v(t,s)A_v(s)∫_s^t g(u(r)) dW_U(r) ds, with A_v(s) appearing twice, whereas Definition 2.14 and the preceding derivation give a single A(u(s)) in that term. This should be corrected for consistency with (2.19).
[Section 2.6, Remark 4] The sentence 'Since H is finite-dimensional we obtain that S_c(t) := e^{tA_c} is a group' is inaccurate: H is an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space throughout the paper, and the relevant finite-dimensional object is the center subspace H_c. The wording should be changed to 'Since H_c is finite-dimensional'.
[Section 3.2, metastability discussion] There are two remarks labeled '4)' in Section 2.6: one about decomposing the integral into one-dimensional integrals and fractional calculus, and a later one about additive fractional noise. The second of these should be labeled '5)'.
[Section 3.4, Remark 1] The invariant measure written in (3.13) is described as 'technically ... to be understood more precisely using the Gaussian free field' but no precise definition is given. Since this is a survey, a citation to a rigorous treatment of the Gibbs measure for the Allen-Cahn SPDE would help the reader.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Two load-bearing theorems in the survey are deferred to the authors' own preprints, and the bibliography gives [123] and [124] the same arXiv ID; no independent derivation or external verification is supplied.

self citation load bearing [Section 2.4, Theorem 2.15 and the following proof sketch]
"Theorem 2.15. Under the previous assumptions, the quasilinear problem (2.16) has a unique local-in-time pathwise mild solution. The statement can be proved using fixed-point arguments as in [123]."

The unique-existence theorem is the load-bearing content of Section 2.4, and the proof is not carried out in the paper; it is deferred to [123], a preprint by the same two authors. The preceding 'two steps' (reduce to (2.20), invoke [151, Theorem 5.3], show Phi is a contraction) are an outline, not a proof, and the contraction argument in the needed function space is precisely what is delegated to [123]. Thus the survey's account of quasilinear pathwise mild solutions rests on the authors' own unverified preprint rather than on an argument contained in the paper. The reference list gives no independent locator because [123] is arXiv:1802.10016.
self citation load bearing [Section 3.3, Theorem 3.15 and the following proof outline]
"However, modifying the Lyapunov-Perron method one obtains the following result, see [124]. ... The proof essentially combines rough path techniques with the Lyapunov-Perron method for discrete-time dynamical systems. For further details on this topic see [124]."

The local center manifold for the rough SPDE (2.26) is the central advertised result of Section 3.3, but its existence is asserted by reference to [124], the authors' own preprint. The two bullet points (discretize the Lyapunov-Perron map; apply the Lyapunov-Perron method in a sequence space) are only a sketch and contain none of the estimates needed to justify the fixed point. No external theorem establishes the result, and the bibliography assigns [124] the same arXiv identifier (1802.10016) as [123], so the cited support cannot even be distinguished or independently checked. The result thus reduces, as presented, to a self-citation chain.

full rationale

This is a survey rather than a derivation paper, so most of its content is attribution to the external literature and is not circular; the classical Itô, Walsh, variational, rough-path, and regularity-structure sections are self-contained surveys with citations that can be checked independently. The only circularity-load-bearing points are the two recent theorems credited to the authors' own preprints [123] and [124], for which the in-text arguments are sketches and the bibliography conflates the two sources under one arXiv ID. The Section 3.2 LDP rate function for (3.12), which omits the drift and Laplacian, is a correctness/accuracy defect rather than a circular reduction, so it does not raise the circularity score. Since the survey has substantial independent content outside these two delegated theorems, the score is 4 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 11 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey contributes no free parameters and no invented entities. Its load-bearing inputs are quoted theorems from the literature; the least independently supported inputs are the authors' own recent results in Sections 2.4, 2.6, and 3.3, which are stated with sketches and delegated to preprints the bibliography does not cleanly identify. Everything else (Ito integration, variational theory, regularity structures, RDS formalism) is standard material attributed to external monographs and papers.

assumptions (11)

domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions for semilinear SPDEs under Lipschitz and linear-growth conditions (Theorem 2.8, cited to [51, Theorem 7.2])
Invoked in Section 2.1 as the classical baseline solution theory; the survey gives no proof, only the fixed-point remark.
domain assumption Variational solution theory for Gelfand triples under hemicontinuity, local monotonicity, coercivity, and boundedness (Theorem 2.13, cited to [130, Theorem 1.1])
Section 2.3; underpins the stability theorems of Section 3.2.
standard math Ito isometry and stochastic integration for Hilbert-space-valued integrands (Theorem 2.4)
Background for all Ito-type solution concepts in Section 2; stated without proof.
domain assumption Dalang's condition (2.25) characterizes well-posedness of the heat equation with spatially correlated noise
Section 2.5; used to conclude (2.21) is ill-posed in d >= 2; attributed to [52] and [164].
domain assumption Regularity structures provide renormalized local solutions for locally subcritical singular SPDEs (cited to [99])
Section 2.7; the basis for the renormalized Nagumo and Allen-Cahn solution statement (2.40).
domain assumption Rough path integration machinery, including the Sewing Lemma, defines the stochastic convolution (2.28) (cited to [106] and [76])
Section 2.6; the basis for Theorem 2.17. The survey sketches the Taylor expansion and cites [106] for the limiting argument.
ad hoc to paper Existence of a unique local pathwise mild solution for quasilinear SPDEs (Theorem 2.15)
Section 2.4; stated as a theorem but supported only by a sketch and the authors' preprint [123], which shares its arXiv identifier with [124] in the bibliography.
ad hoc to paper Existence of a local center manifold for rough SPDEs (Theorem 3.15)
Section 3.3; the 'proof' is a five-line discretization sketch and the source is the authors' preprint [124], conflated with [123] in the reference list.
domain assumption Random pullback attractor existence via compact absorbing sets (Theorem 3.21, cited to [156] and [45])
Section 3.4; the standard criterion behind the attractor examples.
standard math Doss-Sussmann transformations reduce additive and linear multiplicative noise SPDEs to random-coefficient PDEs (Examples 3.5 and 3.6)
Section 3.1; the basis for the invariant-manifold and attractor constructions; asserted and cited to [60], [157].
domain assumption Kolmogorov's continuity theorem does not extend to random fields indexed by infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces (cited to [142])
Section 3.1; used to explain why SPDE solutions generally do not generate cocycle RDS directly.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamics of Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7Q7VJXKY

@misc{pith2026190809177,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamics of Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7Q7VJXKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09177}
}

read the original abstract

Stochastic partial differential equations (SPDEs) represent a very active research field with numerous recent developments and breakthrough results. There are several well-established approaches and methods used to construct solutions for SPDEs, which is always a challenge due to the irregularity of the noise terms that perturb the equation. In applications, such noise terms can quantify the lack of knowledge of certain parameters, finite-size effects, and/or fluctuations occurring due to external perturbations. Since SPDEs have become a key modelling tool in applications, there has been a growing interest in studying their dynamical phenomena. The main goal of this work is to provide a survey on different approaches to solution theory and dynamical properties for SPDEs, which is accessible for a wide community interested in modern methods in stochastic analysis, dynamics and applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

An optimal local theory for reaction-diffusion equations driven by non-trace-class noise
math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Reaction-diffusion SPDEs with non-trace-class multiplicative noise are shown to be locally well-posed in critical Besov spaces of initial data, with regularization, blow-up criteria, and positivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

169 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[18]

Berglund and B

N. Berglund and B. Gentz. Sharp estimates for metastabl e lifetimes in parabolic SPDEs: Kramers’ law and beyond. Electron. J. Probab. , 24(18):1–58, 2013

2013
[124]

Pathwise mild solutions for quasilinear stochastic partial differential equations

C. Kuehn and A. Neamt ¸u. Rough center manifolds. arXiv:1802.10016, pages 1–41, 2018

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[22]

Bessaih, M

H. Bessaih, M. Garrido-Atienza, B. Schmalfuß. Pathwis e solutions and attractors for retarded SPDEs with time smooth diﬀusion coeﬃ cients. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 34(10): 3945–3968, 2014

2014
[79]

Gao, M.J

H. Gao, M.J. Garrido-Atienza and B. Schmalfuß. Random a ttractors for stochastic evolution equations driven by fractional Br ownian mo- tion. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 46(4):2281– 2309, 2014. 55

2014
[1]

H. Amann. Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Volume I: Abstract Linear Theory . Springer, 1995

1995
[2]

Antonopoulou, P.W

D.C. Antonopoulou, P.W. Bates, D. Bl¨ omker, G.D. Karali . Motion of a droplet for the stochastic mass-conserving Allen-Cahn equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(1):670–708, 2016. 50

2016
[3]

L. Arnold. Stochastic systems: qualitative theory and L yapunov ex- ponents. Fluctuations and Sensitivity in Nonequilibrium S ystems. Springer Proc. Phys., 1, pp. 11–18, Springer, Berlin, 1984

1984
[4]

L. Arnold. Random Dynamical Systems . Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2003

2003

Show all 169 references

[5]

Babin and M.I

A.V. Babin and M.I. Vishik. Attractors of Evolution Equations . North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1992

1992
[6]

Bailleul

I. Bailleul. Flows driven by Banach space-valued rough paths. S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XL VI, pp. 195–205, 2014

2014
[7]

Bailleul, A

I. Bailleul, A. Debussche and M. Hofmanov´ a. Quasilinea r generalized parabolic Anderson model equation. Stochastics and Partial Diﬀeren- tial Equations: Analysis and Computation , 7(1):40–63, 2019

2019
[8]

Bailleul and M

I. Bailleul and M. Hoshino. Paracontrolled calculus and regularity structures. arXiv:1812.07919, pages 1–27, 2018

2018 arXiv
[9]

Bailleul, S

I. Bailleul, S. Riedel and M. Scheutzow. Random dynamica l system, rough paths and rough ﬂows. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 262(12):5792–5823, 2017

2017
[10]

Balan, M

R.M. Balan, M. Jolis and L. Quer-Sardanyons. Intermitt ency for the Hyperbolic Anderson Model with rough noise in space. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 127(7):2316–2338, 2017

2017
[11]

Balan and J

R.M. Balan and J. Song. Second order Lyapunov exponents for parabolic and hyperbolic Anderson models. To appear in Bernoulli
[12]

Barbu, G

V. Barbu, G. Da Prato and M. R¨ ockner. Existence of stron g solutions for stochastic porous media equations under general monoto nicity con- ditions. Ann. Probab., 37(2):428–452, 2009

2009
[13]

Barbu and M

V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner. An operatorial approach to sto chastic partial diﬀerential equations driven by linear multiplicat ive noise. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 17(7):1789-1915, 2015

1915
[14]

Barbu and M

V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner. Nonlinear Fokker–Planck equa tions driven by Gaussian linear multiplicative noise. arXiv:1708.08768, pages 1–42, 2017

2017 arXiv
[15]

F. Barret. Sharp asymptotics of metastable transition times for one-dimensional SPDEs. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. , 51(1):129–166, 2015

2015
[16]

Bates, K

P. Bates, K. Lu and B. Wang. Random attractors for stocha stic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains. J. Diﬀer. Equa- tions, 246(2):845–869, 2009

2009
[17]

Berglund

N. Berglund. An introduction to singular stochastic PD Es: Allen-Cahn equations, metastability and regularity structures. arXiv:1901.07420, pages 1–95, 2019. 51

1901 arXiv
[19]

Berglund and C

N. Berglund and C. Kuehn. Regularity structures and ren ormalisation of FitzHughNagumo SPDEs in three space dimensions. Electron. J. Probab., 21(18):1–48, 2016

2016
[20]

Berglund and C

N. Berglund and C. Kuehn. Model spaces of regularity str uctures of space-fractional SPDEs. J. Stat. Phys. , 168(2):331–368, 2017

2017
[21]

Bessaih, Y

H. Bessaih, Y. Efendiev and R.F. Maris. Stochastic homo genization for a diﬀusion-reaction model. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 39(9):5403– 5429, 2019

2019
[23]

W. Beyn, B. Gess, P. Lescot and M. Roeckner. The global ra ndom attractor for a class of stochastic porous media equations. Comm. Par- tial Diﬀerential Equations , 36(3):446-469, 2011

2011
[24]

Bl¨ omker

D. Bl¨ omker. Amplitude Equations for Stochastic Partial Diﬀerential Equations. World Scientiﬁc, 2007

2007
[25]

Bl¨ omker and M

D. Bl¨ omker and M. Hairer. Amplitude equations for SPDE s: Approx- imate centre manifolds and invariant measures. Probability and partial diﬀerential equations in modern applied mathematics . Springer, 2005

2005
[26]

Bl¨ omker, M

D. Bl¨ omker, M. Hairer and G. Pavliotis. Modulation Equ ations: Stochastic Bifurcation in Large Domains. Comm. Math. Phys , 258(2):479–512, 2015

2015
[27]

Bl¨ omker and W.W

D. Bl¨ omker and W.W. Mohammed. Amplitude equations for SPDEs with cubic nonlinearities. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes . 85(2):181–215, 2013

2013
[28]

Bl¨ omker and W

D. Bl¨ omker and W. Wang. Qualitative properties of loca l random invariant manifolds for SPDEs with quadratic nonlinearity . J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equations , 22(4):677–695, 2010

2010
[29]

Bogachev, N

V.I. Bogachev, N. V. Krylov, M. R¨ ockner, S.V. Shaposhn ikov. Fokker- Planck-Kolmogorov Equations . Mathematical Surverys and Mono- graphs, vol. 207, 2015

2015
[30]

A. Brault. Solving rough diﬀerential equations with the theory of regularity structures. arXiv:1712.06285, pages 1–38, 2017

2017 arXiv
[31]

Bruned, A

Y. Bruned, A. Chandra, I. Chevyrev and M. Hairer. Renorm alising SPDEs in regularity structures. arXiv:1711.10239, pages 1–85, 2017

2017 arXiv
[32]

Bruned, M

Y. Bruned, M. Hairer and L. Zambotti. Algebraic renorma lisation of regularity structures. Invent. Math. , 215(3):1039–1156, 2019. 52

2019
[33]

Brze´ zniak, B

Z. Brze´ zniak, B. Goldys and Q.T. Le Gia. Random Attract ors for the Stochastic Navier-Stokes Equations on the 2D Unit Sphere. J. Math. Fluid Mech. , 20:227–253, 2018

2018
[34]

Brze´ zniak and E

Z. Brze´ zniak and E. Motyl. The existence of martingale solutions to the stochastic Boussinesq equations. Global Stoch. Anal. 1(2):175–216, 2014

2014
[35]

Brze´ zniak, D

Z. Brze´ zniak, D. Salopek and J.M.A.M. van Neerven. Sto chastic evolution equations driven by Liouville fractional Browni an motion. Czech. Math.J. , 62(1):1–27, 2012

2012
[36]

Callaway, T.S

M. Callaway, T.S. Doan, J.S.W. Lamb and M. Rasmussen. Th e di- chotomy spectrum for random dynamical systems and pitchfor k bifur- cations with additive noise. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. , 53(4):1548–1574, 2017

2017
[37]

Caraballo, J

T. Caraballo, J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Invariant manifolds for random and stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. Adv. Nonlin- ear Studies , 10(1):23–52, 2010

2010
[38]

Caraballo and K

T. Caraballo and K. Liu. On exponential stability crite ria of stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. Stoch. Proc. Appl., 83(2): 289–301, 1999

1999
[39]

Caraballo and S

T. Caraballo and S. Sonner. Random pullback exponentia l attrac- tors: general existence results for random dynamical syste ms in Ba- nach spaces. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 37(12):6383–6403, 2017

2017
[40]

Catellier and K

R. Catellier and K. Chouk. Paracontrolled distributio ns and the 3-dimensional stochastic quantization equation. Ann. Probab. , 46(5):2621–2679, 2018

2018
[41]

Chandra and M

A. Chandra and M. Hairer. An analytic BPHZ theorem for re gularity structures. arXiv:1612.08138, pages 1–129, 2016

2016 arXiv
[42]

Crauel, A

H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli. Random attract ors. J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. , 9(2):307–341, 1997

1997
[43]

S. Cerrai. A Khasminskii type averaging principle for s tochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations. Ann. Appl. Probab., 19(3):899–948, 2009

2009
[44]

Cerrai and M

S. Cerrai and M. R¨ ockner. Large deviations for stochas tic reaction- diﬀusion systems with multiplicative noise and non-Lipschi tz reaction term. Ann. Probab., 32(1B):1100–1139, 2004

2004
[45]

Crauel and F

H. Crauel and F. Flandoli. Attractors for random dynami cal systems. Probab. Theory Rel. Fields , 100(3):365– 393, 1994

1994
[46]

Chekroun, E

M.D. Chekroun, E. Simonnet and M. Ghil. Stochastic clim ate dy- namics: Random attractors and time-dependent invariant me asures. Physica D , 240(21):1685–1700, 2011

2011
[47]

Chekroun, H

M.D. Chekroun, H. Liu and S. Wang. Approximation of stochas- tic invariant manifolds. Stochastic manifolds for nonline ar SPDEs I . Springer, 2015. 53

2015
[48]

Chen, A.J

X. Chen, A.J. Roberts and J. Duan. Centre manifolds for s tochastic evolution equations. J. Diﬀer. Equ. Appl. , 21(7):602–632
[49]

Chenal and A

F. Chenal and A. Millet. Uniform large deviations for pa rabolic SPDEs and applications. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 72(2):161–186, 1997

1997
[50]

Crauel and P.E

H. Crauel and P.E. Kloeden. Nonautonomous and random at tractors. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.- Ver. , 117(3):173–206, 2015

2015
[51]

Da Prato and J

G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk. Stochastic Equations in Inﬁnite Dimen- sions. Cambridge University Press, 1992

1992
[52]

Extending the martingale measure stochast ic integral with applications to spatially homogeneous s.p.d.e.’s

R.C Dalang. Extending the martingale measure stochast ic integral with applications to spatially homogeneous s.p.d.e.’s. Electron. J. Probab., 4(6):1–29, 1999

1999
[53]

Dalang and L

R.C. Dalang and L. Quer-Sardanyons. Stochastic integr als for spdes’s. A comparison. Expositiones Mathematicae, 29(1):67–109, 2011

2011
[54]

Dareiotis and B

K. Dareiotis and B. Gess. Nonlinear diﬀusion equations w ith nonlinear gradient noise. arXiv:1811.08356, pages 1–42, 2019

2019 arXiv
[55]

Debussche

A. Debussche. On the ﬁnite dimensionality of random att ractors. Stoch. Anal. Appl. , 15:473–491, 1997

1997
[56]

Debussche, M

A. Debussche, M. Hofmanov´ a and J. Vovelle. Degenerate parabolic stochastic partial diﬀerential equations: quasilinear cas e. Ann. Probab., 44(3):1916–1955, 2016

1916
[57]

A. Deya, M. Gubinelli and S. Tindel. Non-linear rough he at equations. Probab. Theory Related Fields. 153:(1–2)97–147, 2012

2012
[58]

A. Deya, M. Gubinelli, M. Hofmanova and S. Tindel. A prio ri esti- mates for rough PDEs with application to rough conservation laws. arXiv:1604.00437, pages 1–51, 2016

2016 arXiv
[59]

Deya and S

A. Deya and S. Tindel. Rate of convergence to equilibriu m of fractional driven stochastic diﬀerential equations with rough multipl icative noise. Ann. Probab., 47(1):464–518, 2019

2019
[60]

H. Doss. Liens entre ´ equations diﬀ´ erentielles stochastiques et ordinar- ies. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Sect B (N.S.) , 13(2):99–125, 1977

1977
[61]

Du and J

A. Du and J. Duan. Invariant manifold reduction for stoc hastic dy- namical systems. Dynamic Systems and Applications 16:681-696, 2007

2007
[62]

J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. Ann. Probab., 31(4):2109–2135, 2003

2003
[63]

J. Duan, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Smooth Stable and Unstab le Man- ifolds for Stochastic Evolutionary Equations. J. Dynam. Diﬀ. Eq. , 16(4) 949–972, 2004

2004
[64]

J. Duan, W. Wang. Eﬀective Dynamics of Stochastic Partial Diﬀer- ential Equations . Elsevier, 2014. 54

2014
[65]

Duncan, B

T.E. Duncan, B. Pasik-Duncan and B. Maslowski. Fractio nal Brow- nian motion and stochastic equations in Hilbert spaces. Stoch. Dyn. , 2(2):225–250, 2002

2002
[66]

Eichinger, C

K. Eichinger, C. Kuehn and A. Neamt ¸u. Sample Paths Esti mates for Stochastic Fast-Slow Systems driven by Fractional Brownia n Motion. arXiv:1905.06824, pages 1–44, 2019

1905 arXiv
[67]

Faris and G

W.G. Faris and G. Jona-Lasinio. Large ﬂuctuations for a nonlinear heat equation with noise. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. , 15:3025–3055, 1982

1982
[68]

Fehrmann and B

B. Fehrmann and B. Gess. Well-posedness of stochastic p orous media equations with nonlinear, conservative noise. To appear in Arch. Ra- tion. Mech. Anal
[69]

Flandoli, B

F. Flandoli, B. Gess and M. Scheutzow. Synchronization by noise for order-preserving random dynamical systems. Annals. Probab. , 45(2):1325–1350, 2017

2017
[70]

Flandoli and K.-U

F. Flandoli and K.-U. Schauml¨ oﬀel. Stochastic parabol ic equations in bounded domains: random evolution operator and Lyapunov ex- ponents. Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 29(4):461–485, 1990

1990
[71]

Fenichel

N. Fenichel. Persistence and smoothness of invariant m anifolds for ﬂows. J. Indiana Math. , 21(3):193–226, 1972

1972
[72]

Foondun and D

M. Foondun and D. Khoshnevisan. Intermittence and nonl in- ear stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. Electron. J. Probab. , 14(21):548–568, 2009

2009
[73]

Freidlin

M.I. Freidlin. Random perturbations of reaction-diﬀus ion equations: the quasideterministic approximation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 305(2):665–697, 1988

1988
[74]

Freidlin and A.D

M.I. Freidlin and A.D. Wentzell. Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems. Springer, 1998

1998
[75]

Freidlin and A.D

M.I. Freidlin and A.D. Wentzell. Averaging principle f or stochastic perturbations of multifrequency systems. Stoch. Dynam. , 3:393–408, 2003

2003
[76]

Friz and M

P.K. Friz and M. Hairer. A Course on Rough Paths . Springer, 2014

2014
[77]

Friz and N.B

P.K. Friz and N.B. Victoir. Multidimensional Stochastic Processes as Rough Paths: Theory and Applications . Cambridge Studies in Ad- vanced Mathematics, 2010

2010
[78]

Furlan and M

M. Furlan and M. Gubinelli. Paracontrolled quasilinea r SPDEs. Ann. Probab., 47(2):1096–1135, 2019

2019
[80]

Garcia-Ojalvo and J

J. Garcia-Ojalvo and J. Sancho. Noise in Spatially Extended Systems . Springer, 1999

1999
[81]

Garrido-Atienza, K

M.J. Garrido-Atienza, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Random dy nami- cal systems for stochastic evolution equations driven by mu ltiplicative fractional Brownian noise with Hurst parametes H ∈ (1/3, 1/2]. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst . 15(1), 625–654, 2016

2016
[82]

Garrido-Atienza, A

M.J. Garrido-Atienza, A. Neuenkirch and B. Schmalfuß. Asymptotical stability of diﬀerential equations driven by H¨ older contin uous paths. J. Dyn. Diﬀ. Equat. , 30:359–377 2018

2018
[83]

Garrido-Atienza, B

M.J. Garrido-Atienza, B. Schmalfuß. Local Stability o f Diﬀerential Equations Driven by H¨ older-Continuous Paths with H¨ older Index in (1/3,1/2). SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 17(3):2352–2380, 2018

2018
[84]

Garrido-Atienza, K

M.J. Garrido-Atienza, K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Unstable invariant manifolds for stochastic PDEs driven by a fractional Browni an motion. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 248(7):1637–1667, 2010

2010
[85]

Gerasimoviˇ cs and M

A. Gerasimoviˇ cs and M. Hairer. H¨ ormander’s theorem for semilinear SPDEs. arXiv:1811.06339, pages 1–60, 2018

2018 arXiv
[86]

Gerencs´ er and M

M. Gerencs´ er and M. Hairer. A solution theory for quasi linear singular SPDEs. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 2019

2019
[87]

B. Gess. Random attractors for singular stochastic evo lution equa- tions. J. Diﬀ. Equations , 255(3):524–559, 2013

2013
[88]

B. Gess. Random attractors for stochastic porous media equations perturbed by space-time linear multiplicative noise. Ann. Probab. , 42(2):818–864, 2014

2014
[89]

B. Gess, W. Liu and M. R¨ ockner. Random attractors for a c lass of stochastic partial diﬀerential equations driven by gener al additive noise. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 251(4-5):1225–1253, 2011

2011
[90]

Ghani Varzaneh and S

M. Ghani Varzaneh and S. Riedel. A dynamical theory for s ingular stochastic delay diﬀerential equations with a multiplicati ve ergodic theorem on ﬁelds of Banach spaces. arXiv:1903.01172, pages 1–47, 2019

1903 arXiv
[91]

Gnann, C

M. Gnann, C. Kuehn and A. Pein. Towards sample path estim ates for fast-slow SPDEs. Euro. J. Appl. Math., accepted / to appear
[92]

Gowda and C

K. Gowda and C. Kuehn. Early-warning signs for pattern f ormation in stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. Commun. Nonlinear. Sci. , 22(1):55–69, 2015

2015
[93]

Grafke, T

T. Grafke, T. Sch¨ afer and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Long term eﬀects of small random perturbations on dynamical systems: Theoreti cal and computational tools. In Recent Progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computational Science , pages 17–
[94]

Gubinelli

M. Gubinelli. Controlling rough paths. J. Func. Anal. , 216(1):86–140, 2004

2004
[95]

Gubinelli, P

M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller and N. Perkowski. Paracontro lled distribu- tions and singular PDEs. Forum of Mathematics , Pi, Vol. 3, no. 6, 2015

2015
[96]

Gubinelli and N

M. Gubinelli and N. Perkowski. KPZ reloaded. Comm. Math. Phys. , 349(1):165–269, 2017

2017
[97]

Gubinelli, A

M. Gubinelli, A. Lejay and S. Tindel. Young integrals an d SPDEs. Potential Anal. , 25(4):307–326, 2006

2006
[98]

Gubinelli and S

M. Gubinelli and S. Tindel. Rough evolution equations. Ann. Probab., 38(1):1–75, 2010

2010
[99]

M. Hairer. A theory of regularity structures. Invent. Math. , 198(2):269–504, 2014

2014
[100]

M. Hairer. Solving the KPZ equation. Ann. Math. , 178(2):559–664, 2013

2013
[101]

M. Hairer. Regularity structures and the dynamical Φ 4 3 model. arXiv:1508.05261, pages 1–46, 2015

2015 arXiv
[102]

Hairer and H

M. Hairer and H. Shen. The dynamical Sine-Gordon model . Commun. Math. Phys. , 341(3):933–989, 2016

2016
[103]

D. Henry. Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations . Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 1981

1981
[104]

M. Hairer. Ergodicity of stochastic diﬀerential equat ions driven by fractional Brownian motion. Ann. Probab., 33(2):703–758, 2005

2005
[105]

Hamster and H.J

C. Hamster and H.J. Hupkes. Stability of Traveling Wav es for Reaction-Diﬀusion Equations with Multiplicative Noise . SIAM. J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 18(1):205–278, 2017

2017
[106]

Hesse and A

R. Hesse and A. Neamt ¸u. Local mild solutions for rough stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. To appear in J. Diﬀer. Equations , 2019

2019
[107]

Hesse and A

R. Hesse and A. Neamt ¸u. Global solutions and random dy namical systems for rough evolution equations. arXiv:1811.09517, pages 1–30, 2019

2019 arXiv
[108]

Hocquet and M

A. Hocquet and M. Hofmanov´ a. An energy method for roug h partial diﬀerential equations. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 265(4):313–345, 2018

2018
[109]

Hofmanov´ a and T

M. Hofmanov´ a and T. Zhang. Quasilinear parabolic sto chastic partial diﬀerential equations: existence, uniqueness. To Appear in Stoch. Proc. Appl
[110]

W. Hu, M. Salins and K. Spiliopoulos. Large deviations and averaging for systems of slow-fast stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equa tions. To appear in Stochastics and Partial Diﬀerential Equations: Analysis a nd Computations, 2019. 57

2019
[111]

Khasminskii

R.Z. Khasminskii. Stochastic Stability of Diﬀerential Equations . Springer, 2011

2011
[112]

Kloeden and T

P. Kloeden and T. Lorenz. Mean-square random dynamica l systems. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 253(5):1422–1438, 2012

2012
[113]

Kloeden, C

P.E. Kloeden, C. P¨ otzsche and Martin Rasmussen. Limi tations of pullback attractors for processes. J. Diﬀerence Equ. Appl. , 18(4):693– 701, 2012

2012
[114]

Kloeden and M

P.E. Kloeden and M. Rasmussen. Nonautonomous Dynamical Sys- tems. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 176, 264 pp, 201 1
[115]

Y. Hu, J. Huang and D. Nualart. On the intermittency fro nt of stochastic heat equation driven by colored noises. Electron. Commun. Probab., 21(21):1–13, 2016

2016
[116]

Y. Hu, J. Huang, K. Lˆ e, D. Nualart and S. Tindel. Stocha s- tic heat equation with rough dependence in space. Annal. Probab. , 45(6B):4561–4616, 2017

2017
[117]

A. Hutt, A. Longtin, and L. Schimansky-Geier. Additiv e noise- induced Turing transitions in spatial systems with applica tion to neu- ral ﬁelds and the Swift-Hohenberg equation. Physica D , 237(6):755– 773, 2008

2008
[118]

Krylov and B.L

N.V. Krylov and B.L. Rozovskii. Stochastic evolution equations. J. Sov. Math. , 16(4):1233–1277, 1981

1981
[119]

C. Kuehn. Warning signs for wave speed transitions of n oisy Fisher- KPP invasion fronts. Theor. Ecol., 6(3):295–308, 2013

2013
[120]

C. Kuehn. Numerical continuation and SPDE stability f or the 2d cubic-quintic Allen-Cahn equation. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quan- tif., 3(1):762–789, 2015

2015
[121]

C. Kuehn. Travelling Waves in Monostable and Bistable Stochastic Partial Diﬀerential Equations Jahresber. DMV, accepted / to appear
[122]

C. Kuehn. PDE Dynamics: An Introduction . SIAM, 2019

2019
[125]

Kuehn, A

C. Kuehn, A. Neamt ¸u and A. Pein. Random attractors for stochastic partly dissipative systems. arXiv:1906.08594, pages 1–25, 2019

1906 arXiv
[126]

Kuehn and F

C. Kuehn and F. Romano. Scaling laws and bifurcations f or SPDEs. Eur. J. Appl. Math., accepted / to appear
[127]

H. Kunita. Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Diﬀerential Equations . Cambridge University Press, 1990. 58

1990
[128]

Langa and J.C

J.A. Langa and J.C. Robinson. Fractal dimension of an i nvariant set. J. Math. Pure. Appl. , 85(2):269–294, 2006

2006
[129]

Lian and K

Z. Lian and K. Lu. Lyapunov Exponents and Invariant Man ifolds for Random Dynamical Systems in a Banach Space. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 206(967):vi+106, 2010

2010
[130]

Liu and M

W. Liu and M. R¨ ockner. SPDE in Hilbert space with local ly mono- tone coeﬃcients. J. Func. Anal. , 259(11):2902–2922, 2010

2010
[131]

K. Lu, A. Neamt ¸u and B. Schmalfuß. On the Oseledets-sp litting for inﬁnite-dimensional random dynamical systems. Discrete Con- tin. Dyn.Syst. , 23(3):1219–1242, 2018

2018
[132]

Lu and B

K. Lu and B. Schmalfuß. Invariant manifolds for stocha stic wave equations. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 236(2): 460–492, 2007

2007
[133]

Lv and J

G. Lv and J. Duan. Impacts of noise on a class of partial d iﬀerential equations. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 258(6):2196–2220, 2015

2015
[134]

T. Lyons. Diﬀerential equations driven by rough signal s. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 14(2):215–310, 1998

1998
[135]

Lyons and Z

T. Lyons and Z. Qian. System control and rough paths . Oxford Math- ematical Monographs, Oxford Science Publications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

2002
[136]

Mandelbrot and J

B. Mandelbrot and J. van Ness. Fractional Brownian mot ions, frac- tional noises and applications. SIAM Review . 10(4):1–16, 1968

1968
[137]

X. Mao. Exponential stability of stochastic diﬀerential equation s. Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1 82. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1994

1994
[138]

Maslowski and J

B. Maslowski and J. van Neerven. Equivalence of laws an d null con- trollability for SPDEs driven by a fractional Brownian moti on. Non- linear Diﬀerential Equations Appl. , 20(4):1473–1498, 2013

2013
[139]

Maslowski and D

B. Maslowski and D. Nualart. Evolution equations driv en by a frac- tional Brownian motion. J. Funct. Anal. , 202(1):277–305, 2003

2003
[140]

Maslowski and B

B. Maslowski and B. Schmalfuß. Random dynamical syste ms and stationary solutions of diﬀerential equations driven by the fractional Brownian motion. Stochastic Anal. Appl. , 22(6):1577–1607, 2004

2004
[141]

Millet and M

A. Millet and M. Sanz-Sol´ e. Approximation of rough pa ths of frac- tional Brownian motion. Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Ra ndom Fields and Applications V, 275– 303, Progr. Probab., 59, Bir kh¨ auser, Basel, 2008

2008
[142]

Mohammed, T

S. Mohammed, T. Zhang, H. Zhao. The stable manifold theorem for semilinear stochastic evolution equations and stochastic partial diﬀer- ential equations. Memoirs of the AIMS, vol. 196, nr. 197, 2008. 59

2008
[143]

Mueller, L

C. Mueller, L. Mytnik and J. Quastel. Eﬀect of noise on fr ont prop- agation in reaction-diﬀusion equations of KPP type. Invent. Math. , 184(2):401–453, 2011

2011
[144]

Mueller and R.B

C. Mueller and R.B. Sowers. Blowup for the heat equatio n with a noise term. Prob. Theor. Rel. Fields , 97(3):287–320, 1993

1993
[145]

Nualart Stochastic calculus with respect to the fra ctional Brown- ian motion and applications

D. Nualart Stochastic calculus with respect to the fra ctional Brown- ian motion and applications. Contemp. Math., 336:3–39, 2003

2003
[146]

Ondrej´ at

M. Ondrej´ at. Uniqueness of stochastic evolution equ ations in Banach spaces. Dissertationes Math. 426, 63 pp., Warszawa, 2004

2004
[147]

Otto and H

F. Otto and H. Weber. Quasilinear SPDEs via Rough Paths . Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. , 232(2):873–950, 2019

2019
[148]

A. Pazy. Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Par- tial Diﬀerential Equations . Springer Applied Mathematical Series. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1983

1983
[149]

P¨ otzsche.Geometric Theory of Discrete Nonautonomous Dynami- cal Systems

C. P¨ otzsche.Geometric Theory of Discrete Nonautonomous Dynami- cal Systems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2002, Springer-Verlag , Berlin, 2010

2002
[150]

Pr` evˆ ot and M

C. Pr` evˆ ot and M. R¨ ockner. A concise course on Stocha stic Partial Diﬀerential Equations. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1905, Sp ringer 2007

1905
[151]

Pronk and M.C

M. Pronk and M.C. Veraar. A new approach to stochastic e volution equations with adapted drift. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 256:3634–3684, 2015

2015
[152]

R¨ ockner and Y

M. R¨ ockner and Y. Wang. A Note on variational solution s to SPDE perturbed by Gaussian noise in a general class. Inﬁn. Di- mens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. , 12(2):353–358, 2009

2009
[153]

Russo and P

F. Russo and P. Vallois. Forward, backward and symmetr ic stochastic integration. Probab. Theory Rel. , 97(3):403–421, 1993

1993
[154]

Scheutzow

M. Scheutzow. On the perfection of crude cocycles. Random Comput. Dynam., 4(4):235–255, 1996

1996
[155]

Scheutzow

M. Scheutzow. Comparison of various concepts of a rand om attractor: a case study. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 78(3):233–240, 2002

2002
[156]

Schmalfuß

B. Schmalfuß. Backward Cocycles and Attractors of Stochastic Dif- ferential Equations . Nonlinear Dynamics: Attractor Approximation and Global Behaviour, Contributions to the International. Seminar ISAM’92, 1992

1992
[157]

Sussmann

H.J. Sussmann. On the gap between deterministic and st ochastic ordinary diﬀerential equations. Ann. Probab., 6(1):19–41, 1978

1978
[158]

Sell and Y

G. Sell and Y. You. Dynamics of Evolutionary Equations . Springer- Verlag New York, 2002. 60

2002
[159]

van Neerven

J.M.A.M. van Neerven. Stochastic Evolution Equations . ISEM Lec- ture Notes 2007/08, 2008

2007
[160]

R. Temam. Inﬁnite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

1997
[161]

van Neerven, M.C

J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar and L. Weis. Stochas tic evolu- tion equations in UMD Banach spaces J. Funct. Anal. 255(4):940–993, 2008

2008
[162]

van Neerven, M.C

J.M.A.M. van Neerven, M.C. Veraar and L. Weis. Stochas tic maximal Lp-regularity. Ann. Probab., 40(2):788–812, 2012

2012
[163]

M.C. Veraar. Stochastic integration in Banach spaces and applica- tions to parabolic evolution equations. PhD Thesis, Delft U niversity, 2006

2006
[164]

J.B. Walsh. An introduction to stochastic partial diﬀe rential equa- tions. Ecole d’Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIV - 19 84, Lect. Notes Math. 1180, 265-437, 1986

1986
[165]

B. Wang. Random attractors for non-autonomous stocha stic wave equations with multiplicative noise. Discrete Contin. Dyn . Syst., 34(1):269–300,2014

2014
[166]

Wang and J

W. Wang and J. Duan. A dynamical approximation of stoch astic partial diﬀerential equations. J. Math. Phys. , 48(10):102701–102701- 14, 2007

2007
[167]

Wang and A.J

W. Wang and A.J. Roberts. Average and deviation for slo w– fast stochastic partial diﬀerential equations. J. Diﬀer. Equations , 253(1):1265–1286, 2012

2012
[168]

Waymire and J

E. Waymire and J. Duan. Probability and Partial Diﬀerential Equa- tions in Modern Applied Mathematics . Springer–Verlag, 2005

2005
[169]

A. Yagi. Quasilinear abstract parabolic evolution equations with a ppli- cations. Progress in Nonlinear Diﬀerential Equations and Their Appl i- cations, Vol. 50, 381–397, Birkhauser Verlag Basel/Switze rland, 2002

2002
[170]

L.C. Young. An integration of H¨ older type, connected with Stieltjes integration. Acta Math. , 67(1):251–282, 1936. 61

1936

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [18]

Berglund and B

N. Berglund and B. Gentz. Sharp estimates for metastabl e lifetimes in parabolic SPDEs: Kramers’ law and beyond. Electron. J. Probab. , 24(18):1–58, 2013

2013

[2] [124]

Pathwise mild solutions for quasilinear stochastic partial differential equations

C. Kuehn and A. Neamt ¸u. Rough center manifolds. arXiv:1802.10016, pages 1–41, 2018

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[3] [22]

Bessaih, M

H. Bessaih, M. Garrido-Atienza, B. Schmalfuß. Pathwis e solutions and attractors for retarded SPDEs with time smooth diﬀusion coeﬃ cients. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 34(10): 3945–3968, 2014

2014

[4] [79]

Gao, M.J

H. Gao, M.J. Garrido-Atienza and B. Schmalfuß. Random a ttractors for stochastic evolution equations driven by fractional Br ownian mo- tion. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 46(4):2281– 2309, 2014. 55

2014

[5] [1]

H. Amann. Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Volume I: Abstract Linear Theory . Springer, 1995

1995

[6] [2]

Antonopoulou, P.W

D.C. Antonopoulou, P.W. Bates, D. Bl¨ omker, G.D. Karali . Motion of a droplet for the stochastic mass-conserving Allen-Cahn equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48(1):670–708, 2016. 50

2016

[7] [3]

L. Arnold. Stochastic systems: qualitative theory and L yapunov ex- ponents. Fluctuations and Sensitivity in Nonequilibrium S ystems. Springer Proc. Phys., 1, pp. 11–18, Springer, Berlin, 1984

1984

[8] [4]

L. Arnold. Random Dynamical Systems . Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2003

2003