New clues on the extended HeII ionization in IZw18 from GTC/MEGARA and JWST/MIRI

A. Arroyo-Polonio; C. Kehrig; D. Reverte; E. Perez-Montero; J. Gallego; J. Iglesias-P\'aramo; J.M. V\'ilchez; S. Duarte Puertas

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

New clues on the extended HeII ionization in IZw18 from GTC/MEGARA and JWST/MIRI

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The first detection of the high-ionization [Ne V]14.32 μm line in IZw18 is spatially extended and coincides with the He II λ4686 peak, indicating ionizing sources above 97 eV.

desk verdict First [Ne V] detection in IZw18 is a high-stakes claim, but the paper does not yet show the line. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01742 v1 pith:7QAIKQH7 submitted 2025-07-02 astro-ph.GA

A. Arroyo-Polonio , C. Kehrig , J.M. Vílchez , J. Iglesias-Páramo , E. Perez-Montero , S. Duarte Puertas , J. Gallego , D. Reverte This is my paper

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords IZw18HeIIemission[NeV]JWST/MIRIGTC/MEGARAlow-metallicitygalaxiesgalaxykinematicsstellarfeedback

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the extremely metal-poor galaxy IZw18 emits the high-ionization [Ne V]14.32 μm line, detected here for the first time, and that this emission is spatially extended and peaks at the same location as the He II λ4686 line. Since producing [Ne V] requires photons above 97 eV, the detection implies the presence of ionizing sources more energetic than the mechanisms previously proposed on the basis of He II emission alone. The paper also reports that the He II-emitting gas is kinematically decoupled from the H II gas traced by Hβ, with higher velocity dispersions and a blueshifted wing that may indicate an early-stage stellar-driven outflow. If correct, the results provide a sharper view of what powers high-ionization emission in low-metallicity galaxies like those expected in the early Universe.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the joint analysis of two integral-field data sets: optical GTC/MEGARA maps of Hβ and He II λ4686, and JWST/MIRI mid-infrared maps of the [Ne V]14.32 μm line. The argument works by comparing ionization potentials (13.6 eV for Hβ, 54.4 eV for He II, 97.1 eV for [Ne V]) and by registering the two data cubes through matching the Hβ peak to the Humphrey-α peak. The line-profile analysis, including Gaussian fits and center-of-mass velocities with bootstrap uncertainties, underlies the kinematic and outflow claims.

What would settle it

Re-reducing the MIRI data with a full noise model, or checking the alignment with a different emission line, would determine whether the [Ne V]14.32 μm detection and its peak coincidence are real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the first detection of the [Ne V]14.32 μm line in IZw18, an ion with an ionization potential of 97.1 eV, roughly twice that needed to produce He II. The [Ne V] emission is extended over about 160 pc and its peak coincides with the peak of He II λ4686, while both are offset from the Hβ peak by about 140 pc. The paper argues that this spatial coincidence implies that the same highly energetic sources likely power both lines, and that those sources exceed the energies of the mechanisms considered in earlier work based only on He II. It also finds that the He II gas has higher velocity dispersions and a different velocity pattern than Hβ, and that the integrated He II profile shows a blueshifted extension interpreted as an early-stage outflow.

Load-bearing premise

The central interpretation rests on the assumption that the faint [Ne V]14.32 μm feature is genuinely present in the MIRI data and that the optical and infrared maps are aligned accurately enough for the peak coincidence to be real.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the [Ne V] detection holds, models of IZw18 must incorporate sources producing photons above 97 eV, excluding explanations that rely solely on typical Wolf-Rayet stars or X-ray binaries.
The spatial coincidence of the [Ne V] and He II peaks supports a common origin for the bulk of the He II emission and the extreme-UV radiation field.
The blueshifted wing in the He II profile indicates an early-stage outflow that, depending on the gas it encounters, could later open a path for Lyman-continuum photon escape.
The 140 pc offset between the Hβ and He II peaks implies that the hardest ionizing sources are not at the site of peak star formation, complicating simple starburst interpretations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the [Ne V] peak indeed tracks He II, the same 14.32 μm line could serve as a mid-infrared diagnostic for >97 eV photons in other low-metallicity He II-emitting galaxies, including high-redshift analogues where the optical [Ne V] λ3426 line is too faint.
The cross-instrument registration is a critical step; an independent astrometric check using a different emission line would test whether the claimed spatial coincidence is genuine.
Because the paper does not display the extracted [Ne V] spectrum or its signal-to-noise, a follow-up presentation of the spectrum and noise model would allow the community to assess the detection strength directly.
The outflow interpretation relies on one integrated line profile; spatially resolved kinematic maps could determine whether the blueshifted component is a global outflow or a localized feedback region.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this one for the claim, not for the execution. The result is the first reported [Ne V]14.32 μm detection in IZw18, the benchmark local analogue to reionization-era galaxies. If it holds, it pushes the required ionizing photon energy above 97 eV and directly challenges the PopIII-like star explanations proposed from He II alone. That is a real potential advance.

What is genuinely new: the [Ne V] map, the 140 pc offset between He II and Hβ peaks, and the blue wing in the integrated He II profile. The optical MEGARA work is carefully done: Gaussian fits, bootstrap uncertainties, instrumental/thermal broadening subtracted, and thresholds stated. The Ekin estimate is order-of-magnitude and compared to Starburst99 without tuning, so it is not a circular fit. The authors are also appropriately hedged about the outflow interpretation.

The soft spot, and it is load-bearing, is the [Ne V] detection itself. Section 3.2 reports the line and points to maps, but gives no extracted spectrum, no signal-to-noise ratio, no flux uncertainty, and no line-profile plot. At R~2400, a faint continuum residual or artifact at 14.32 μm would be mistaken for the line. The emissivity argument for why the MIR line is easier than the optical search is fine, but it does not substitute for a spectrum. The spatial coincidence with the He II peak is also sold as central to the interpretation, but the registration between the MIRI and MEGARA cubes is described only as "careful" alignment of Hβ and Huα peaks, with no quoted tolerance. A 0.2–0.4 arcsec offset is plausible and would smear the peak coincidence over a substantial fraction of the claimed 160 pc extension.

Everything else in the paper is consistent with the existing literature and does not depend on the [Ne V] detection. The kinematic results, the velocity offsets, and the previous Kehrig et al. context are all solid. The self-citations are appropriate, not inflationary.

This paper deserves a serious referee. The referee needs to request the extracted [Ne V] spectrum with S/N and flux uncertainty, and an explicit statement of the astrometric alignment error. I would not desk-reject it, but I would not accept the central claim on the current text.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The letter combines new GTC/MEGARA optical IFU data (Hβ and He II λ4686) with archival JWST/MIRI MRS mid-infrared IFU data to study the high-ionization gas in the low-metallicity galaxy IZw18. It reports the first detection of the [Ne V] 14.32 μm emission line in this galaxy, claims that the [Ne V] emission is spatially extended (~160 pc) and peaks very close to the He II λ4686 peak, and uses this to argue for ionizing sources with photon energies above 97 eV, beyond what is needed for He II. The kinematic analysis shows that the He II-emitting gas has higher velocity dispersions and a different velocity field than the Hβ-emitting gas, and an integrated He II profile shows a blueshifted wing interpreted as a possible early-stage outflow. The paper also reports a 140 pc projected offset between the Hβ and He II peaks, suggesting distinct spatial distributions of moderate and extreme ionizing sources.

Significance. If the [Ne V] detection is secure, this is a potentially important result: IZw18 is a key local analogue for early-Universe star-forming galaxies, and a robust detection of a 97.1 eV ionization tracer would place strong new constraints on the spectral energy distribution of its ionizing sources, going beyond the long-debated He II constraint. The manuscript's use of public JWST/MIRI archival data, its transparent description of the optical line-fitting and bootstrap uncertainties, and its order-of-magnitude comparison with Starburst99 energy injection are all strengths. However, the central claim currently rests on a line detection that is presented only as spatial maps, with no extracted spectrum, signal-to-noise ratio, flux uncertainty, or quantitative line-identification check, and the peak-coincidence argument depends on a spatial registration whose uncertainty is not stated. These are fixable in revision, but they are load-bearing for the letter's headline conclusion.

major comments (2)

[Section 3.2, spatial matching paragraph] The [Ne V] 14.32 μm detection is reported only through contour maps; no extracted spectrum, line profile, S/N, continuum level, flux, or flux uncertainty is shown anywhere in the letter. Because the entire >97 eV inference rests on this one line being real and correctly identified at R~2400, the manuscript must display the spectrum at the [Ne V] peak (and preferably an integrated spectrum over the extended region), report the line centroid in observed wavelength and compare it with the expected redshifted position using the galaxy's systemic velocity, and quantify the S/N and line flux with uncertainties. The claim that the emission is extended over ~1.8 arcsec also needs a quantitative definition (e.g., the contour level at which the extent is measured, or the area above a noise-based threshold), rather than an eyeball contour. Without this documentation, the central claim cannot be independently checked.
[Section 3.2, spatial matching paragraph] The letter states that a 'careful spatial matching' of the Hβ peak with the Humphreys-α peak was performed, but it gives no alignment uncertainty or validation. With a MIRI PSF of ~0.5 arcsec and MEGARA spaxels of 0.62 arcsec, an uncorrected offset of only ~0.2–0.3 arcsec could shift the apparent [Ne V] peak relative to the He II peak by a substantial fraction of a spaxel, weakening the claimed peak coincidence. The authors should quantify the registration error (e.g., centroiding uncertainty of the matched peaks, cross-correlation residual, or astrometric calibration uncertainty) and show that the [Ne V]–He II spatial coincidence is robust to plausible misalignments. This is essential because the shared-source interpretation in Conclusion 4 depends directly on the peak coincidence.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.1, kinetic energy estimate] The Ekin estimate adopts R = 200 pc, ne = 100 cm−3, f = 0.1, and σ = 30 km s−1 without sensitivity analysis; because these parameters are uncertain by factors of a few, the agreement with Starburst99 should be presented as a range (e.g., with plausible parameter variations) rather than a single value of 3×10^53 erg.
[Section 3.1, integrated line profiles] The significance of the blueshifted wing is not quantified; the residual in Figure 2 shows an excess near −100 km s−1, but no S/N or confidence interval is given for this excess, and it is unclear whether the ±165 km s−1 integration window affects Hβ and He II differently. Please add a significance estimate for the blue-wing asymmetry.
[Section 3.2, line identification] The identification of the line as [Ne V] 14.32 μm should include a check for possible confusion with other lines or MIRI fringing residuals at similar wavelengths, and the expected observed wavelength should be stated explicitly using the known systemic velocity of IZw18.
[Throughout] There are several typographical issues: '1.6 arscec' should be '1.6 arcsec', 'Humphrey-α' should be 'Humphreys α', 'pannel' should be 'panel', 'Ryb' should be 'Ryd', and '[Nev]' is sometimes written without the space in '[Ne v]'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the [Ne V] detection and its spatial coincidence with He II are new measurements; prior self-citations provide context, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

The paper's central new claim is the first detection of [Ne V]14.32 µm in IZw18 and its spatial association with He II λ4686; this is an observational measurement rather than a quantity derived from a fitted model. No equation in the paper reduces to a fitted parameter: the Ekin estimate uses explicitly adopted values (R=200 pc, ne=100 cm^-3, f=0.1, σ=30 km/s) and is then compared with an external Starburst99 prediction as an order-of-magnitude consistency check. The [Ne V] line identification rests on the MIRI wavelength calibration and the atomic ionization potential (97.1 eV), not on the paper's own assumptions. Self-citations (e.g., Kehrig et al. 2015, 2021; Arroyo-Polonio et al. 2024) are used for observational context, reduction procedures, and previously proposed He II mechanisms, and the paper explicitly labels the He II ionizing source as 'still an open question,' so those citations are not load-bearing. The spatial registration is performed by matching Hβ (GTC/MEGARA) with Humphreys α (JWST/MIRI); the subsequent comparison of [Ne V] with He II is not forced by that alignment. The absence of an extracted [Ne V] spectrum, S/N, and flux uncertainty is a verification weakness, but it is a data-quality/correctness issue, not an instance of a claim reducing to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The energy budget argument depends on three adopted parameters (R, n_e, f). The main results, the [Ne V] detection and the He II/Hβ morphological and kinematic comparison, do not depend on these parameters.

free parameters (3)

Radius R of the He III region = 200 pc
Adopted (not measured) in the kinetic energy estimate Ekin = 3/2 M sigma^2; the result scales as R^3.
Mean electron density n_e of He III region = 100 cm^-3
Adopted value in the mass estimate; not directly measured, and IZw18 has ne < 300 cm^-3 from the literature.
Volume filling factor f = 0.1
Adopted value in the mass estimate; not measured; directly multiplies the gas mass.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Distance to IZw18 is 18.2 Mpc
All projected sizes (140 pc offset, 160 pc [Ne V] extent) and the He II luminosity scale with the assumed distance from Aloisi et al. 2007.
domain assumption Electron temperature and density of IZw18 are Te ~ 20,000 K and ne < 300 cm^-3
Used to compute the [Ne V] emissivity ratio favoring 14.32 μm over 3426 Å; cited from Kehrig et al. 2016.
standard math CHIANTI v11 and PyNeb atomic data correctly compute the [Ne V] emissivity ratio
The claim that the IR [Ne V] line is about 70% more emissive than the optical line depends on these atomic calculations.
standard math Single-Gaussian line fitting within S/N>3 and FWHM thresholds
All kinematic measurements assume the quoted fitting procedure and thresholds; biased fits would alter velocity and dispersion maps.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New clues on the extended HeII ionization in IZw18 from GTC/MEGARA and JWST/MIRI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7QAIKQH7

@misc{pith2026250701742,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New clues on the extended HeII ionization in IZw18 from GTC/MEGARA and JWST/MIRI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7QAIKQH7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01742}
}

abstract

IZw18 is one of the lowest-metallicity star-forming galaxies known at z$\sim$0, considered a unique local analogue of the first galaxies. The origin of its hard ionizing continuum, expected to be a common feature in the early Universe and traced by He\textsc{ii} emission lines, remains intensely debated and challenging to explain. Here we combine optical (GTC/MEGARA) and mid-infrared (JWST/MIRI) integral field spectroscopic observations for IZw18 to shed new light on the high-ionization phenomenon. This letter reports the first detection of the high-ionization [Ne\textsc{v}]14.32 $\mu$m line in IZw18. Its emission is spatially extended and coincident with the He\textsc{ii} peak, revealing the presence of highly energetic ionizing sources that surpass mechanisms previously proposed on the basis of He\textsc{ii} alone. Our kinematic studies highlight that the He\textsc{ii}$\lambda$4686-emitting gas displays higher velocity dispersions and a different velocity pattern compared to the H$\beta$ emission, suggesting the presence of energetic processes such as shocks or stellar-driven feedback. Additionally, integrated spectra show asymmetric blueshifted profiles in the He\textsc{ii}$\lambda$4686 line, possibly indicating \textbf{early-stage} stellar-driven outflows potentially facilitating future ionizing photon leakage. Our spatial analysis also reveals differences in structure between the emission of H$\beta$ and He\textsc{ii}$\lambda$4686, with the He\textsc{ii}$\lambda$4686 peak offset by a projected distance of 140 pc from the peak H$\beta$ emission. This indicates distinct locations for the most extreme ionizing sources compared to moderate ionizing sources. Our findings underscore the complex interplay of physical processes in extremely metal-poor environments with \textbf{high-ionized} gas, offering new insights into the conditions prevailing in the early galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.01742 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Maps of the flux (left), radial velocity (middle) and radial velocity dispersion (right) of the selected emission lines: Hβ (top), and Heiiλ4686 (bottom). The isocontours overplotted in all panels (except for the top-left one) represent the Hβ flux for reference. The white bar represented in the top-left panel represents 1 arcsec (i.e. ∼ 88 pc) which is the FWHM of the Gaussian kernel used to smooth the data. Black … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Line profiles of Hβ (in red), and Heiiλ4686 (in blue). In the upper part, solid lines represent the observed line profiles and dashed lines the best Gaussian fit of each line. Vertical dotted lines represent the centroid of each Gaussian. Vertical solid lines represent the center of mass of each profile. In the bottom part the residuals (observation - Gaussian fit) are represented. The flux of each line is normalize… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (Left panel) The MEGARA Hβ emission map as a color-filled contour plot, smoothed using bilinear interpolation. For reference, the isocontours of the MEGARA Heiiλ4686 and the MIRI [NeV]14.32µm emissions are overplotted in white and black, respectively. (Righ panel) Color-composite image in three bandpasses: near-infrared JWST NIRCam/F115W continuum at ∼ 1.15µm (red), optical HST ACS/F606W continuum at ∼ 6060˚A (green… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (Left panel) The MIRI Huα emission map. For reference, the isocontours of the MEGARA Hβ emission is overplotted in white. (Right panel) The MIRI [Nev]14.32µm emission map. Again, for reference, the isocontours of the MEGARA Hβ emission is overplotted in white. ACKNOWLE…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 667, L151 Amor ´ ın, R., Rodr ´ ıguez-Henr ´ ıquez, M., Fern´ andez, V., et al

Aloisi, A., Clementini, G., Tosi, M., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 667, L151 Amor ´ ın, R., Rodr ´ ıguez-Henr ´ ıquez, M., Fern´ andez, V., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 682, L25 8

work page 2007
[2]

2013, The Astronomical Journal, 146, 144

Annibali, F., Cignoni, M., Tosi, M., et al. 2013, The Astronomical Journal, 146, 144

work page 2013
[3]

I., et al

Arroyo-Polonio, A., Kehrig, C., Paramo, J. I., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics

work page 2024
[4]

2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 502, 791

Atek, H., Schaerer, D., & Kunth, D. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 502, 791

work page 2009
[5]

2002, in The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, Vol

Bomans, D., & Weis, K. 2002, in The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, Vol. 262, 141

work page 2002
[6]

A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al

Carr, C. A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 137

work page 2025
[7]

2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A68

Cassata, P., Le F` evre, O., Charlot, S., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A68

work page 2013
[8]

2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 3133

Wofford, A. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 3133

work page 2016

Show all 49 references

[9]

L., Groves, B., Kewley, L

Davies, R. L., Groves, B., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 470, 4974

2017
[10]

2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 71

Dufresne, R., Del Zanna, G., Young, P., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 71

2024
[11]

1985, Behaviormetrika, 12, 1

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. 1985, Behaviormetrika, 12, 1

1985
[12]

J., & Stanway, E

Eldridge, J. J., & Stanway, E. R. 2022, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 60, 455

2022
[13]

U., Bomans, D

Enders, A. U., Bomans, D. J., & Wittje, A. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 672, A11

2023
[14]

R., Moran, E

Flury, S. R., Moran, E. C., & Eleazer, M. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 4231

2023
[15]

R., Jaskot, A

Flury, S. R., Jaskot, A. E., Saldana-Lopez, A., et al. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12118

2024 arXiv
[16]

R., Kennicutt, R

Garnett, D. R., Kennicutt, R. C., Chu, Y.-H., & Skillman, E. D. 1991, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 103, 850 Gil de Paz, A. G., Carrasco, E., Gallego, J., et al. 2016, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, Vol. 9908, SPIE, 420–439

1991
[17]

G., Izotov, Y

Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 531, 776

2000
[18]

2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 2556

Izotov, Y., Thuan, T., & Guseva, N. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 2556

2021
[19]

A., V ´ ılchez, J., & Ramos-Larios, G

Kehrig, C., Guerrero, M. A., V ´ ılchez, J., & Ramos-Larios, G. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L54

2021
[20]

A., et al

Kehrig, C., V ´ ılchez, J., Guerrero, M. A., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 1081

2018
[21]

2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 801, L28

Kehrig, C., V ´ ılchez, J., P´ erez-Montero, E., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 801, L28

2015
[22]

2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 526, A128

Kehrig, C., Oey, M., Crowther, P., et al. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 526, A128

2011
[23]

2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459, 2992

Kehrig, C., V ´ ılchez, J., P´ erez-Montero, E., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459, 2992

2016
[24]

D., et al

Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 123, 3

1999
[25]

Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 573, A42

2015
[26]

C., et al

Maiolino, R., Russell, H., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2017, Nature, 544, 202

2017
[27]

G., James, B

Mingozzi, M., Del Valle-Espinosa, M. G., James, B. L., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07662

2025 arXiv
[28]

2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.06831

Mondal, C., Saha, K., Borgohain, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.06831. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06831

2025 arXiv
[29]

P., Matthee, J., Oesch, P

Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 510, 4582

2022
[30]

2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 624, A89

Nanayakkara, T., Brinchmann, J., Boogaard, L., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 624, A89

2019
[31]

M., & Schaerer, D

Oskinova, L. M., & Schaerer, D. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 661, A67 P´ erez-Montero, E., Kehrig, C., V ´ ılchez, J., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 643, A80

2022
[32]

2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 978

Plat, A., Charlot, S., Bruzual, G., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 978

2019
[33]

2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08376

Roy, A., Krumholz, M., Salvadori, S., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.08376

2025 arXiv
[34]

Rupke, D. S. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 138

2018
[35]

2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 3796

Saxena, A., Pentericci, L., Schaerer, D., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496, 3796

2020
[36]

2002, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 382, 28

Schaerer, D. 2002, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 382, 28

2002
[37]

2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, L4

Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Barrufet, L., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, L4

2022
[38]

P., Mirocha, J., et al

Senchyna, P., Stark, D. P., Mirocha, J., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494, 941

2020
[39]

2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 421, 1043

Shirazi, M., & Brinchmann, J. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 421, 1043

2012
[40]

2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A127

Simmonds, C., Schaerer, D., & Verhamme, A. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A127

2021
[41]

J., Franx, M., et al

Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Franx, M., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 801, 122

2015
[42]

R., & Eldridge, J

Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. 2019, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 15, 84

2019
[43]

X., Bauer, F

Thuan, T. X., Bauer, F. E., Papaderos, P., & Izotov, Y. I. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 606, 213

2004
[44]

X., & Izotov, Y

Thuan, T. X., & Izotov, Y. I. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 161, 240

2005
[45]

2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 1093 9

Vanzella, E., Caminha, G., Calura, F., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 1093 9

2020
[46]

Vaught, R. J. R., Sandstrom, K. M., & Hunt, L. K. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 911, L17

2021
[47]

L., et al

Venditti, A., Bromm, V., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 973, L12 V ´ ılchez, J. M., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 508, 248

2024
[48]

Exter, K. M. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ, 381, 913, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12252.x

2007
[49]

2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 4463

Yu, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Y., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 486, 4463

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 667, L151 Amor ´ ın, R., Rodr ´ ıguez-Henr ´ ıquez, M., Fern´ andez, V., et al

Aloisi, A., Clementini, G., Tosi, M., et al. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 667, L151 Amor ´ ın, R., Rodr ´ ıguez-Henr ´ ıquez, M., Fern´ andez, V., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 682, L25 8

work page 2007

[2] [2]

2013, The Astronomical Journal, 146, 144

Annibali, F., Cignoni, M., Tosi, M., et al. 2013, The Astronomical Journal, 146, 144

work page 2013

[3] [3]

I., et al

Arroyo-Polonio, A., Kehrig, C., Paramo, J. I., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics

work page 2024

[4] [4]

2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 502, 791

Atek, H., Schaerer, D., & Kunth, D. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 502, 791

work page 2009

[5] [5]

2002, in The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, Vol

Bomans, D., & Weis, K. 2002, in The High Energy Universe at Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, Vol. 262, 141

work page 2002

[6] [6]

A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al

Carr, C. A., Cen, R., Scarlata, C., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 137

work page 2025

[7] [7]

2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A68

Cassata, P., Le F` evre, O., Charlot, S., et al. 2013, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 556, A68

work page 2013

[8] [8]

2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 3133

Wofford, A. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 457, 3133

work page 2016