Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 29 references

Low-loss thin-film periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser photolithography

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that periodically poled lithium niobate ridge waveguides made by femtosecond-laser photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching reach a record-low propagation loss of 0.106 dB/cm, with near-record second-harmonic…

desk verdict A credible fabrication advance—record-low loss for PPLNOI waveguides via PLACE and post-etch poling—but the headline loss number comes from a ring measurement, not the actual SHG device, and error bars are missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14950 v3 pith:7R6IKPL3 submitted 2025-04-21 physics.optics

Guanghui Zhao , Jintian Lin , Renhong Gao , Jianglin Guan , Chuntao Li , Xinzhi Zheng , Minghui Li , Qifeng Hou
show 5 more authors
Xiaochao Luo Yingnuo Qiu Lingling Qiao Min Wang Ya Cheng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Ky42.82.Et
keywords periodicallypoledlithiumniobatethin-filmPPLNOIwaveguidesfemtosecondlaserphotolithographychemomechanicaletchingsecond-harmonicgenerationpropagationlossquasi-phasematching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that periodically poled lithium niobate on insulator (PPLNOI) ridge waveguides can be made with record-low loss by reversing the usual fabrication order: first cut ultra-smooth ridges with chemo-mechanical etching through a femtosecond-laser-written mask, then invert the ferroelectric domains with high-voltage pulses. The resulting 7-mm waveguide shows a propagation loss of 0.106 dB/cm, about half the best prior value for such devices, and converts a telecom pump into second-harmonic light at 805% per watt, close to the record set by electron-beam-lithographed waveguides. If true, this means high-efficiency nonlinear photonics could be fabricated at lower cost and larger scale than the current e-beam-plus-dry-etch route. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that fabrication order and surface smoothness, not material quality, are the main barriers to low-loss PPLNOI devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is PLACE, photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching, followed by post-etch high-voltage pulse poling. A femtosecond laser ablates a chromium mask on the lithium niobate film, chemo-mechanical polishing transfers the ridge pattern into the film with sub-nanometer smoothness, and comb-shaped electrodes then apply 400-V pulses to invert the domains beneath the ridge. The poling period is set by the quasi-phase-matching condition $\Lambda = \lambda_{2\omega}/(n_{2\omega}-n_\omega)$, giving 3.62 µm for a 1550-nm pump.

What would settle it

Measure the straight-waveguide propagation loss directly by cut-back: compare end-to-end transmission through PPLNOI ridge waveguides of different lengths and see whether the extracted loss matches 0.106 dB/cm, and repeat the SHG slope measurement with independently calibrated facet coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that doing chemo-mechanical etching before ferroelectric poling eliminates the two known loss sources in PPLNOI: rough sidewalls and etch-rate differences between oppositely poled domains. The PLACE process, followed by 400-V pulse poling through comb electrodes, produces sidewalls with 0.27 nm average roughness and a single-mode 7-mm ridge waveguide whose loss is measured at 0.106 dB/cm in the telecom band. That waveguide then delivers quasi-phase-matched second-harmonic generation with normalized efficiency 1643% W⁻¹ cm⁻² and a slope efficiency of 805%/W at 24.8 °C, improving to 1742% W⁻¹ cm⁻² at 59 °C, with absolute conversion of 15.8% at 21.6 mW pump power.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 0.106 dB/cm propagation loss derived from the intrinsic Q factor of a 2-mm racetrack microring is representative of the 7-mm straight ridge waveguide actually used for second-harmonic generation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Over the 7-mm device length, 0.106 dB/cm means roughly 1.7% total propagation loss, so most pump power stays in the waveguide and longer cascaded devices become practical.
  • Because poling occurs after etching, the method avoids domain-selective etch rates and can be applied to any pre-etched LNOI ridge without extra processing.
  • The room-temperature SHG slope of 805%/W approaches the 814%/W record from e-beam/dry-etched PPLNOI, indicating comparable nonlinear performance at lower fabrication cost.
  • Raising the device temperature to 59 °C shifts the phase-matching wavelength from 1556.56 nm to 1561.51 nm and increases normalized efficiency to 1742% W⁻¹ cm⁻².

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ring-derived loss transfers to straight guides, this fabrication route should also benefit quantum photon-pair sources, where on-chip loss directly suppresses pair-generation brightness.
  • A cut-back measurement on straight waveguides would be a stricter test than ring-Q loss, since bends and coupling can either mask sidewall scattering or add loss not present in the SHG device.
  • Combining PLACE with duty-cycle engineering or chirped poling could plausibly push normalized efficiency beyond the current benchmark, since the method already removes the loss that limits net conversion.
  • The same laser-mask-plus-CMP sequence should transfer to other ferroelectric thin films such as lithium tantalate, where dry-etch roughness is likewise a bottleneck.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the fabrication of a 7-mm-long periodically poled lithium niobate on insulator (PPLNOI) ridge waveguide using photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE) followed by high-voltage pulse poling. The authors measure an average surface roughness of 0.27 nm, extract a propagation loss of 0.106 dB/cm from the intrinsic Q of a 2-mm racetrack microring, and demonstrate second-harmonic generation with a normalized efficiency of 1643%·W⁻¹·cm⁻² and a slope of 805%/W at room temperature, increasing to 1742%·W⁻¹·cm⁻² at 59 °C. The central claims are a record-low propagation loss in PPLNOI waveguides and near-record SHG conversion efficiency at low fabrication cost.

Significance. If the loss and efficiency figures are robust, the work is significant: it provides a low-cost, lithography-based alternative to electron-beam lithography for PPLNOI waveguides, with ultra-smooth sidewalls that mitigate scattering loss. The internal consistency between the QPM period calculation and the SHG wavelength, as well as the agreement between the normalized efficiency and the slope (805%/W over 0.7 cm yields 1643%/W/cm²), support the plausibility of the reported conversion performance. The paper, however, does not supply uncertainty estimates or repeated-device statistics, and the loss measurement is not performed on the straight waveguide used for SHG.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fabrication and characterization (Fig. 2 and propagation loss paragraph)] The propagation loss of 0.106 dB/cm is extracted from the intrinsic Q factor of a 2-mm racetrack PPLNOI microring, but the SHG device is a 7-mm straight ridge waveguide. The manuscript does not state explicitly that the racetrack and the straight waveguide were co-fabricated on the same chip with identical cross-section and poling parameters, nor does it show the racetrack structure. Because the record-low-loss claim is a central advance, a direct measurement on the straight waveguide (e.g., cut-back or out-scattering) or a clear demonstration of co-fabrication with an upper-bound argument for bend loss is needed. Additionally, no error bars or multiple devices are reported, so the statistical basis for the 'record-low' claim is not established.
  2. [Results, SHG efficiency comparison (Fig. 4(e) and ref. 28)] The comparison to the record conversion efficiency (814%/W, ref. 28) is made using a non-normalized slope (805%/W) without specifying the length of the reference device. The authors also report a normalized efficiency (1643%·W⁻¹·cm⁻²), which is substantially lower than some published normalized values (e.g., 4600%·W⁻¹·cm⁻² in ref. 24). The benchmark should be stated in consistent units (slope versus normalized efficiency) and with the relevant lengths and coupling-loss conventions for the reference, so that the claim of being 'close to the best' is quantitatively justified.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout (title, abstract, fabrication steps)] The term 'PLCAE' appears in the fabrication description and conclusion, inconsistent with the acronym 'PLACE' used elsewhere; also the title contains a stray space in 'waveguide s'.
  2. [Abstract and text] 'closed to the best' should be 'close to the best' (abstract, main text and conclusion).
  3. [Fabrication and characterization (poling period calculation)] The designed poling period of 3.62 μm is calculated for a 1550 nm pump, but the measured phase-matching peak at room temperature is at 1556.56 nm; a brief comment on this 6.5 nm discrepancy (e.g., fabrication tolerances or index-model accuracy) would clarify the reliability of the QPM design.
  4. [Experimental setup paragraph] The calibration of the ~11 dB/facet and ~24 dB/facet coupling losses is described only in one sentence; a short explanation of how these values are de-embedded from the linear transmission measurement would help the reader understand the quoted on-chip efficiencies.
  5. [Figures and typography] The units of normalized efficiency are typeset inconsistently ('%W-1·cm-2' vs '%·W⁻¹·cm⁻²') across the abstract, main text, and figure captions.
  6. [References] Reference 27 contains a typo in the title ('Litium'); also, the temperature values in Fig. 4(b)–(d) are given as 24.8 °C, 44.5 °C, and 59.0 °C, but the text refers to the first as 'room temperature' without specifying whether this was an actively controlled temperature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The results are directly measured; no load-bearing derivation reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental fabrication and characterization report. The central quantities—0.27 nm surface roughness, 3.1×10^6 intrinsic Q factor, 0.106 dB/cm propagation loss, and the SHG conversion efficiencies—are measured values, not derived from the model or from each other. The poling period is obtained from the standard quasi-phase-matching formula Λ = λ2ω/(n2ω − nω) with finite-element simulated effective indices, which is a conventional design calculation rather than a circular prediction. The SHG slope of 805%/W and normalized efficiency of 1643%·W⁻¹·cm⁻² are connected by the physical length squared, an arithmetic relation, not a logical circularity. Self-citations to prior PLACE work (refs. 27, 29) provide context and prior fabrication capability, but the loss and efficiency claims are independently measured in this paper; the cited work is not used as the sole justification for the headline numbers. One validity caveat exists: the propagation-loss value is measured on a 2-mm racetrack microring and then attributed to the 7-mm straight ridge waveguide used for SHG. That is a representativeness/extrapolation assumption about device consistency, not a circular argument, because the loss was not fitted from, nor defined in terms of, the SHG result. No step in the paper's derivation chain reduces by construction to its inputs, so no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard QPM theory, simulated refractive indices, and a set of measured calibration values. No new free parameters are fitted to make the results work. The weakest links are the transfer of ring-measured loss to the straight waveguide, the lack of uncertainty quantification, and the assumption that the poling process does not degrade the polished sidewalls.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The refractive indices of the guided TE modes at 1550 nm and 775 nm, computed by finite element analysis, are accurate (n=1.8656 and 2.0797).
    Used to set the QPM period of 3.62 μm via Λ=λ2ω/(n2ω−nω). If simulated indices are off, the poling period is wrong; the measured phase-matching peak at 1556.56 nm rather than 1550 nm suggests a small offset.
  • domain assumption The intrinsic Q of the racetrack microring is dominated by waveguide propagation loss, allowing extraction of 0.106 dB/cm, and this value transfers to the straight waveguide used for SHG.
    The paper reports the propagation loss from a 2-mm racetrack ring Q, then applies it to the 7-mm straight waveguide. No direct straight-waveguide loss measurement is shown.
  • domain assumption Applying 400 V, 5 ms pulses across 7 μm electrode gaps produces uniform periodic domain inversion in the thin-film LN without degrading sidewall smoothness.
    The paper confirms domain inversion via confocal SH microscopy, but the uniformity and duty cycle along the full 7 mm are not quantified.
  • domain assumption The chemo-mechanical polishing (CMP) process from ref [27] yields ultra-smooth surfaces; the measured 0.27 nm AFM roughness is representative of the sidewall.
    Sidewall roughness is inferred from a surface AFM image; the paper does not show direct sidewall roughness measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low-loss thin-film periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser photolithography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7R6IKPL3

@misc{pith2026250414950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low-loss thin-film periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser photolithography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7R6IKPL3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14950}
}
read the original abstract

Periodically poled lithium niobate on insulator (PPLNOI) ridge waveguides are critical photonic components for both classical and quantum information processing. However, dry etching of PPLNOI waveguides often generates rough sidewalls and variations in the etching rates of oppositely poled lithium niobate ferroelectric domains, leading a relatively high propagation losses (0.25 - 1 dB/cm), which significantly limits net conversion efficiency and hinders scalable photonic integration. In this work, a low-loss PPLNOI ridge waveguide with a length of 7 mm was fabricated using ultra-smooth sidewalls through photolithography-assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE) followed by high-voltage pulse poling with low cost. The average surface roughness was measured at just 0.27 nm, resulting in record-low propagation loss of 0.106 dB/cm in PPLNOI waveguides. Highly efficient second-harmonic generation was demonstrated with a normalized efficiency of 1643%/(W*cm^2) without temperature tuning, corresponding to a conversion efficiency of 805%/W, which is closed to the best conversion efficiency (i.e., 814%/W) reported in nanophotonic PPLNOI waveguide fabricated by expensive electron-beam lithography followed by dry etching. The absolute conversion efficiency reached 15.8% at a pump level of 21.6 mW. And the normalized efficiency can be even improved to 1742%/(W*cm^2) at optimal temperature of 59{\deg}C.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the fabrication the PPLNOI waveguide. The optical microscope image of the fabricated PPLNOI ridge waveguide shows an ultra-smooth surface, as depicted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical micrograph of the single-mode PPLNOI waveguide. (b) The SEM image of the cross section of the ridge waveguide. (c) Mode field profiles and effective refractive indices of the fundamental and second harmonic modes in the waveguide.(d) Simulation of optimum poling period varied with pump wavelengths. (e) Image of the domain inversion structure of the waveguide recorded using the confocal SH microscopy, where t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Bright SHG generated in the waveguide captured by a smartphone. Normalized conversion efficiency of second harmonic as a function of pump wavelength at (b) 24.8C, (c) 44.5C, and (d) 59.0C. (e) Quadratic power dependence of the second harmonic signal on the pump light at 24.8C. The pump wavelength was scanned from 1545 nm to 1565 nm, and the generated second harmonic signal was record by the OSA. When the tempera… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,

    J. Lin, F. Bo, Y. Cheng, et al., “Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,” Photonics Res. 8(12), 1910– 1936 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: Recent advances and perspectives,

    Y. Jia, L. Wang, and F. Chen, “Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: Recent advances and perspectives,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 8(1), 011307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,

    G. Chen, N. Li, J. Ng, et al., “Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,” Adv. Photonics 4(3), 034003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics,

    Z. Xie, F. Bo, J. Lin, et al., “Recent development in integrated Lithium niobate photonics,” Advances in Physics: X 9(1), 2322739 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Nonlinear wave mixing in lithium niobate thin film,

    Y. Zheng and X. Chen, “Nonlinear wave mixing in lithium niobate thin film,” Advances in Physics: X 6(1), 1889402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Broadband Quasi-Phase-Matched Harmonic Generation in an On-Chip Monocrystalline Lithium Niobate Microdisk Resonator,

    J. Lin, N. Yao, Z. Hao, et al., “Broadband Quasi-Phase-Matched Harmonic Generation in an On-Chip Monocrystalline Lithium Niobate Microdisk Resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(17), 173903 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Integrated Pockels laser,

    M. Li, L. Chang, L. Wu, et al., “Integrated Pockels laser,” Nat. Commun. 13(1), 5344 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature 562(7725), 101–104 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Soliton microcomb generation by cavity polygon modes,

    B. Fu, R. Gao, N. Yao, et al., “Soliton microcomb generation by cavity polygon modes,” Opto-Electron. Adv. 7(8), 240061 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Nonlinear Lithium Niobate Metasurfaces for Second Harmonic Generation,

    J. Ma, F. Xie, W. Chen, et al., “Nonlinear Lithium Niobate Metasurfaces for Second Harmonic Generation,” Laser Photonics Rev. 15(5), 2000521 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    An Erbium‐Doped Waveguide Amplifier on Thin Film Lithium Niobate with an Output Power Exceeding 100 mW,

    R. Bao, Z. Fang, J. Liu, et al., “An Erbium‐Doped Waveguide Amplifier on Thin Film Lithium Niobate with an Output Power Exceeding 100 mW,” Laser Photonics Rev. 19(1), 2400765 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    On-Chip Generation and Manipulation of Entangled Photons Based on Reconfigurable Lithium-Niobate Waveguide Circuits,

    H. Jin, F. Liu, P. Xu, et al., “On-Chip Generation and Manipulation of Entangled Photons Based on Reconfigurable Lithium-Niobate Waveguide Circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(10), 103601 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Quantum frequency conversion and single-photon detection with lithium niobate nanophotonic chips,

    X. Wang, X. Jiao, B. Wang, et al., “Quantum frequency conversion and single-photon detection with lithium niobate nanophotonic chips,” npj Quantum Information 9(1), 38 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    High Quality Entangled Photon Pair Generation in Periodically Poled Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Waveguides,

    J. Zhao, C. Ma, M. Rusing, et al., “High Quality Entangled Photon Pair Generation in Periodically Poled Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(16), 163603 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Ultrabright Multiplexed Energy-Time- Entangled Photon Generation from Lithium Niobate on Insulator Chip,

    G. Xue, Y. Niu, X. Liu, et al., “Ultrabright Multiplexed Energy-Time- Entangled Photon Generation from Lithium Niobate on Insulator Chip,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 15(6), 064059 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Second-harmonic generation using d33 in periodically poled lithium niobate microdisk resonators,

    Z. Hao, L. Zhang, W. Mao, et al., “Second-harmonic generation using d33 in periodically poled lithium niobate microdisk resonators,” Photonics Res. 8(3), 311–317 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators,

    J. Lu, M. Li, C. Zou, et al., “Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators,” Optica 7(12), 1654–1659 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Broadband second-harmonic generation in step-chirped periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,

    X. Wu, L. Zhang, Z. Hao, et al., “Broadband second-harmonic generation in step-chirped periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 47(7), 1574–1577 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium- niobate-on-insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,

    Y. Zhang, H. Li, T. Ding, et al., “Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium- niobate-on-insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,” Optica 10(6), 688–693 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Broadband sum-frequency generation using d33 in periodically poled LiNbO3 thin film in the telecommunications band,

    G. Li, Y. Chen, H. Jiang, et al., “Broadband sum-frequency generation using d33 in periodically poled LiNbO3 thin film in the telecommunications band,” Opt. Lett. 42(5), 939–942 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,

    C. Wang, C. Langrock, A. Marandi, et al., “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica 5(11), 1438–1441 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Advancing large-scale thin-film PPLN nonlinear photonics with segmented tunable micro-heaters,

    X. Li, H. Li, Z. Wang, et al., “Advancing large-scale thin-film PPLN nonlinear photonics with segmented tunable micro-heaters,” Photonics Res. 12(8), 1703–1708 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Adapted poling to break the nonlinear efficiency limit in nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides,

    P.K. Chen, I. Briggs, C. Cui, et al., “Adapted poling to break the nonlinear efficiency limit in nanophotonic lithium niobate waveguides,” Nat Nanotechnol 19(1), 44–50 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Actively-monitored periodic-poling in thin-film lithium niobate photonic waveguides with ultrahigh nonlinear conversion efficiency of 4600 %W-1cm-2,

    A. Rao, K. Abdelsalam, T. Sjaardema, et al., “Actively-monitored periodic-poling in thin-film lithium niobate photonic waveguides with ultrahigh nonlinear conversion efficiency of 4600 %W-1cm-2,” Opt. Express 27(18), 25920–25930 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    High-efficiency nonlinear frequency conversion enabled by optimizing the ferroelectric domain structure in x-cut LNOI ridge waveguide,

    Y. Su, X. Zhang, H. Chen, et al., “High-efficiency nonlinear frequency conversion enabled by optimizing the ferroelectric domain structure in x-cut LNOI ridge waveguide,” Nanophotonics 13(18), 3477–3484 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Locally periodically poled LNOI ridge waveguide for second harmonic generation,

    B. Mu, X. Wu, Y. Niu, et al., “Locally periodically poled LNOI ridge waveguide for second harmonic generation,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 19(6), 060007 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Long Low-Loss-Litium Niobate on Insulator Waveguides with Sub-Nanometer Surface Roughness,

    R. Wu, M. Wang, J. Xu, et al., “Long Low-Loss-Litium Niobate on Insulator Waveguides with Sub-Nanometer Surface Roughness,” Nanomaterials 8(11), 910 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Ultra-broadband and low-loss edge coupler for highly efficient second harmonic generation in thin-film lithium niobate,

    X. Liu, S. Gao, C. Zhang, et al., “Ultra-broadband and low-loss edge coupler for highly efficient second harmonic generation in thin-film lithium niobate,” Adv. Photon. Nexus 1(01), 016001 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Ultra-high-speed high-resolution laser lithography for lithium niobate,

    J. Chen, Z. Liu, L. Song, et al., “Ultra-high-speed high-resolution laser lithography for lithium niobate, ” Proc. SPIE 12411, Frontiers in Ultrafast Optics: Biomedical, Scientific, and Industrial Applications XXIII, 1241109 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.