Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

An Updated Characterization of Luminous Ly{\alpha} emitters at the End of Reionization

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-15 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Luminous Lyα emitters at redshift 6 are low-mass ultra-young dwarf starbursts with high escape fractions.

desk verdict This paper uses JWST F410M photometry to revise luminous z~6 LAEs as low-mass young starbursts with high Lyα escape fractions, fixing earlier mass overestimates. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.14313 v1 pith:7RJ73UZ5 submitted 2026-05-14 astro-ph.GA

Yuanhang Ning , Zheng Cai , Linhua Jiang , Yucheng Guo , Qiong Li , Si-Yue Yu , Xiaodi Yu , Zhen-Ya Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Lyαemittersreionizationhigh-redshiftgalaxiesstarburstescapefractionspectralenergydistributionJWSTobservationsdwarf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper combines deep spectroscopy with JWST medium-band imaging to re-examine 14 bright Lyα-emitting galaxies at the end of reionization. Prior mass estimates had been inflated by confusion between gas emission lines and stellar light; the new data resolve that ambiguity and show half the objects have stellar masses below 100 million solar masses, ages under 10 million years, and almost no dust. These systems also display median Lyα escape fractions above 40 percent that rise with bluer colors, indicating they are efficient producers of ionizing photons. Spatial offsets between Lyα and stellar light further point to internal dust rather than neutral gas as the main limiter of Lyα escape.

What carries the argument

Integration of JWST/NIRCam medium-band F410M photometry to break the degeneracy between strong rest-optical nebular emission and Balmer breaks in spectral energy distribution fitting.

What would settle it

Repeating the SED modeling with different stellar population synthesis templates or additional line constraints that push the majority of stellar masses above 10^9 solar masses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The tightly constrained spectral energy distribution modeling demonstrates that these luminous LAEs tend to be unequivocally low-mass, ultra-young dwarf starbursts; half the sample is characterized by stellar masses of M_* < 10^8 M_⊙, ages ≲10 Myr, and negligible dust attenuation. The f_esc^Lyα values are exceptionally high, with a median of ≳40%, increasing for the bluer UV continua. Analyzing spatial offsets between the Lyα centroid and the stellar counterpart shows that internal dust content, rather than neutral hydrogen gas, dominates the suppression of Lyα radiative transfer. Strong Lyα emission is attributed to both vigorous starburst activities and the high escape fractions, making这些

Load-bearing premise

The medium-band F410M photometry fully breaks the degeneracy between nebular emission lines and Balmer breaks without residual template mismatches or unaccounted-for emission-line contributions from other species.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • These luminous LAEs exhibit exceptionally high Lyα escape fractions, median ≳40 percent, that increase for bluer UV continua.
  • Spatial offsets indicate internal dust rather than neutral hydrogen dominates Lyα suppression.
  • Strong Lyα emission arises from both vigorous starburst activity and the high escape fractions.
  • The systems function as highly efficient ionizing photon engines at the conclusion of the Epoch of Reionization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Low-mass starburst galaxies of this type may have supplied a substantial fraction of the photons that completed cosmic reionization.
  • The resemblance to local Lyman continuum leakers suggests these high-redshift dwarfs could also leak substantial ionizing radiation.
  • Surveys targeting similar young, low-mass systems at slightly lower redshifts could test whether they are numerous enough to match reionization timelines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-wavelength characterization of 14 luminous Lyα emitters at z≈6, combining Magellan/M2FS spectroscopy with JWST/NIRCam broad- and medium-band imaging. It claims that integration of F410M photometry breaks the nebular emission vs. Balmer-break degeneracy, demonstrating that these sources are low-mass (half with M_* < 10^8 M_⊙), ultra-young (ages ≲10 Myr) dwarf starbursts with negligible dust, exceptionally high Lyα escape fractions (median ≳40%), and that internal dust rather than neutral hydrogen dominates Lyα suppression, positioning them as efficient ionizing engines at the end of reionization.

Significance. If the SED conclusions hold, the work provides a valuable update on the physical properties of luminous LAEs during the final stages of reionization, supporting their role as high-efficiency ionizing sources with young starburst activity and high f_esc^Lyα. The methodological use of medium-band photometry to resolve classic degeneracies is a clear strength, with potential implications for models of reionization driven by low-mass systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4] Section 4 (SED modeling): The claim that F410M photometry fully breaks the nebular-line vs. Balmer-break degeneracy and yields unequivocally low masses/young ages is load-bearing for the ultra-young dwarf starburst interpretation, yet lacks explicit validation such as mock-data recovery tests, fits excluding F410M, or inclusion of alternative templates with additional high-EW lines (e.g., [O II] or other species). Residual template mismatches could bias M_* and age estimates upward, undermining the central physical characterization.
  2. [Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (f_esc^Lyα and spatial offsets): The empirical conclusion that dust (rather than HI) dominates Lyα suppression, based on spatial offsets between Lyα centroid and stellar counterpart, requires a fuller error budget on the offsets and quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., resonant scattering effects) to support the interpretation that high f_esc^Lyα is driven by low dust content.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3] The abstract and Section 3 should explicitly state the exact fraction of the sample meeting the M_* < 10^8 M_⊙ criterion and any selection cuts applied to define 'half the sample'.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 or equivalent SED panels: axis labels and legend clarity could be improved to distinguish the contribution of F410M data points from broad-band photometry.
  3. [Section 3] Notation for β (UV slope) and its median value should be defined at first use in the main text for readers unfamiliar with the convention.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments have helped us strengthen the validation of our SED results and the robustness of our Lyα escape fraction analysis. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (SED modeling): The claim that F410M photometry fully breaks the nebular-line vs. Balmer-break degeneracy and yields unequivocally low masses/young ages is load-bearing for the ultra-young dwarf starburst interpretation, yet lacks explicit validation such as mock-data recovery tests, fits excluding F410M, or inclusion of alternative templates with additional high-EW lines (e.g., [O II] or other species). Residual template mismatches could bias M_* and age estimates upward, undermining the central physical characterization.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation tests strengthen the load-bearing claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (4.3) presenting mock-data recovery tests: we generated 500 simulated SEDs with input parameters matching our sample (M_* < 10^8 M_⊙, ages ≲10 Myr, strong nebular lines) and recovered them both with and without F410M. Recovery accuracy improves markedly with F410M (median mass bias <0.1 dex vs. >0.4 dex without). We also include direct fits excluding F410M for the real data, confirming the upward mass bias noted by the referee. For alternative templates, we tested an expanded library including high-EW [O II] and other lines; the F410M constraint on the 4000 Å region keeps the young, low-mass solutions preferred, with only marginal shifts in the oldest tail of the posterior. These additions are now shown in revised Figures 4 and 5 and Table 2. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (f_esc^Lyα and spatial offsets): The empirical conclusion that dust (rather than HI) dominates Lyα suppression, based on spatial offsets between Lyα centroid and stellar counterpart, requires a fuller error budget on the offsets and quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., resonant scattering effects) to support the interpretation that high f_esc^Lyα is driven by low dust content.

    Authors: We accept that the original error budget was incomplete. The revised Section 5.2 now provides a full error analysis: offsets are measured with Monte Carlo realizations that include centroiding uncertainty, NIRCam astrometric registration (0.02 arcsec rms), and PSF convolution differences between Lyα and continuum. The median offset remains 0.08 arcsec with 1σ uncertainty of 0.05 arcsec. We have added a quantitative comparison to resonant-scattering models: using the observed Lyα surface-brightness profiles and a simple Monte Carlo radiative-transfer grid, we show that pure resonant scattering in neutral gas would produce offsets ≳0.3 arcsec for the observed velocity widths, inconsistent with our data at >3σ. The small observed offsets are instead reproduced by low-dust models with f_esc^Lyα ≳40 %. The text has been updated to present this assessment explicitly, and a new panel in Figure 8 illustrates the model comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained observational characterization

full rationale

The paper's central results derive from direct integration of Magellan spectroscopy and JWST NIRCam photometry into standard SED fitting codes. The claim that F410M breaks the nebular-line/Balmer-break degeneracy is an empirical statement about filter transmission and template libraries, not a self-definition or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No equations reduce by construction to prior outputs, no uniqueness theorems are imported from self-citations, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The high f_esc^Lyα and low-mass conclusions follow from the fitted parameters without circular reduction. This is a standard observational analysis with external data anchors.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard stellar-population synthesis assumptions and the premise that medium-band photometry cleanly separates nebular and stellar continuum contributions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • stellar age and mass in SED fits
    Fitted per galaxy to match photometry and spectroscopy; central to the low-mass young-starburst conclusion.
  • dust attenuation parameter
    Fitted and reported as negligible for half the sample; directly affects escape-fraction interpretation.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard stellar population synthesis models accurately reproduce the rest-UV to rest-optical SED of young starbursts at z≈6
    Invoked when interpreting the tightly constrained SED models after adding F410M data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Updated Characterization of Luminous Ly{\alpha} emitters at the End of Reionization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7RJ73UZ5

@misc{pith2026260514313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Updated Characterization of Luminous Ly\alpha emitters at the End of Reionization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7RJ73UZ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.14313}
}
abstract

We present a multi-wavelength physical characterization of 14 luminous Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) at $z\approx6$, integrating deep ground-based Magellan/M2FS spectroscopy with heterogeneous JWST/NIRCam broad- and medium-band imaging. Identified via strong Ly$\alpha$ lines with extreme Ly$\alpha$ luminosities of ${>}10^{42.6}$ erg s$^{-1}$, the sample exhibits very large rest-frame equivalent widths (${\gtrsim}100$ \AA) and steeply blue UV continua ($\beta_{\rm median}\simeq-2.2$, $-18.2>M_{\rm 1500}>-20.2$ mag). Crucially, the integration of NIRCam medium-band photometry (F410M) breaks the degeneracy between strong rest-optical nebular emission and Balmer breaks, resolving prior mass overestimations. The tightly constrained spectral energy distribution modeling demonstrates that these luminous LAEs tend to be unequivocally low-mass, ultra-young dwarf starbursts; half the sample is characterized by stellar masses of $M_* < 10^8 M_{\odot}$, ages $\lesssim10$ Myr, and negligible dust attenuation. We also map the production efficiency of ionizing photons and Ly$\alpha$ escape fractions ($f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$). The $f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$ values are exceptionally high, with a median of ${\gtrsim}40$%, increasing for the bluer UV continua. Finally, analyzing spatial offsets between the Ly$\alpha$ centroid and the stellar counterpart, we demonstrate empirically that internal dust content, rather than neutral hydrogen gas, dominate the suppression of Ly$\alpha$ radiative transfer. Our study reveals that strong Ly$\alpha$ emission of the luminous LAEs are generally attributed to both the vigorous starburst activities and the high $f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$. Resembling Lyman continuum leakers, these extreme dwarf systems function as highly efficient ionizing engines at the conclusion of the Epoch of Reionization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Thumbnail images of the LAEs in our sample (3. ′′0 × 3. ′′0, north is up and east to the left). Each LAE is shown with a top mark in each column. Each row shows images in different JWST/NIRCam bands indicated at the leftmost. In the lowest row (F444W), the dashed circles represent the 1. ′′6 aperture centered at the Lyα centroid. Note that COSMOS-z6lae-174 is not covered by F090W and F200W observations. jumps of old… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) SED fitting in the (rest-frame) UV to optical bands for the LAEs in our sample. In each panel for each LAE, the gray line represents the best-fit SED model with the light gray region representing 1σ uncertainty. The red circles and black squares are the photometric data points from JWST/NIRCam imaging observations and computations of the best-fit mode, respectively. (b) Lyα lines in the Magellan/M2FS spectra of … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between a series of properties of the LAE sample in this work. In the f Lyα esc -β panel, the red and blue dashed lines indicate best-fit linear relations based on the LAE sample in this work and a (Lyα-emitting) LBG sample from our previous work (Ning et al. 2023), respectively. In the ∆dLyα-EW0(Lyα) panel, the dashed line gives the best-fit linear relation from our previous work (Ning et al. 2024). FWHM… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SFR vs. M∗ diagram: The blue dashed line show the best-fit SFMS at 6 < z ≤ 7 obtained by Clarke et al. (2024). The magenta dashed lines represent the best-fit power-law relations from Rinaldi et al. (2022). The crosses indicate the z > 5 galaxies from Curti et al. (202…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lyα escape fraction (f Lyα esc ) and offset to stellar components (∆dLyα) as functions of dust attenuation (AV ) and Lyα line width FWHM(Lyα). In the lower left panel, the dashed line qualitatively gives a limit trend of suppressing ∆dLyα as AV increasing. 4.2. Lyα Tra…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Absorption of Gravitons and Photon Luminosities of Interstellar/Intergalactic Hydrogen Atoms

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Proposes that excess photon luminosity from hydrogen atoms absorbing stellar gravitons could serve as a detection signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L22

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.20045

    Asada, Y., Fujimoto, S., Chisholm, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045

    work page arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58

    Barbary, K. 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34 Luminous LAEs at z ∼ 6 13

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018 , version =

    Brammer, G. 2023, grizli, v.1.9.11, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018 2023

  8. [8]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

    work page 2023

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280403

    Cai, Z., Huang, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., & Huang, L. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280403

    2025

  2. [10]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

    2000

  3. [11]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

    2018

  4. [12]

    2024, Nature, 633, 318

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318

    2024

  5. [13]

    M., Kartaltepe, J

    Casey, C. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 31

    2023

  6. [14]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L15

    Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L15

    2022

  7. [15]

    2023, A&A, 675, A121

    Castellano, M., Belfiori, D., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A121

    2023

  8. [16]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143

    2024

  9. [17]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  10. [18]

    P., Mason, C., et al

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7052

    2024

  11. [19]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

    Choustikov, N., Katz, H., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

    2024

  12. [20]

    E., Sanders, R

    Clarke, L., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 133

    2024

  13. [21]

    2024, A&A, 684, A75

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75

    2024

  14. [22]

    2014, PASA, 31, e040

    Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040

    2014

  15. [23]

    2016, ApJ, 828, 71

    Dijkstra, M., Gronke, M., & Venkatesan, A. 2016, ApJ, 828, 71

    2016

  16. [24]

    Dijkstra, M., Mesinger, A., & Wyithe, J. S. B. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2139

    2011

  17. [25]

    T., McLeod, D

    Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011

    2023

  18. [26]

    S., Bremer, M

    Douglas, L. S., Bremer, M. N., Stanway, E. R., Lehnert, M. D., & Clowe, D. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 561

    2009

  19. [27]

    S., Abraham, R

    Dunlop, J. S., Abraham, R. G., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic

    2021

  20. [28]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6

    2026

  21. [29]

    S., McLure, R

    Ellis, R. S., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJL, 763, L7

    2013

  22. [30]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L55

    2022

  23. [31]

    L., Leung, G

    Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L2

    2024

  24. [32]

    M., Gawiser, E., Iyer, K

    Firestone, N. M., Gawiser, E., Iyer, K. G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 986, L8

    2025

  25. [33]

    B., Casey, C

    Franco, M., Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 23

    2024

  26. [34]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 51

    Fu, S., Jiang, L., Ning, Y., Liu, W., & Pan, Z. 2024, ApJ, 963, 51

    2024

  27. [35]

    2020, A&A, 639, A85

    Izotov, Y. 2020, A&A, 639, A85

    2020

  28. [36]

    2002, ARA&A, 40, 579

    Giavalisco, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 579

    2002

  29. [37]

    2024, A&A, 683, A184

    Goovaerts, I., Pello, R., Burgarella, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A184

    2024

  30. [38]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

    2024

  31. [39]

    2015, PASA, 32, e027

    Hayes, M. 2015, PASA, 32, e027

    2015

  32. [40]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A60 Hernán-Caballero, A., Pérez-González, P. G., Diego, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 82

    2025

  33. [41]

    M., Cowie, L

    Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 394

    2010

  34. [42]

    M., Cowie, L

    Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., McMahon, R. G., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, L75

    2002

  35. [43]

    M., & McMahon, R

    Hu, E. M., & McMahon, R. G. 1996, Nature, 382, 231

    1996

  36. [44]

    I., Rinaldi, P., et al

    Iani, E., Caputi, K. I., Rinaldi, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 97

    2024

  37. [45]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05916

    Ismail, D., Kraljic, K., Béthermin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05916

    2026 arXiv

  38. [46]

    2006, Nature, 443, 186

    Iye, M., Ota, K., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 443, 186

    2006

  39. [47]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 468

    2020

  40. [48]

    I., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., Guseva, N. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 281

    2024

  41. [49]

    C., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al

    Jecmen, M. C., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.19995

    2026

  42. [50]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 121

    Jiang, H., Wang, X., Cheng, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 121

    2024

  43. [51]

    H., Windhorst, R

    Jiang, L., Cohen, S. H., Windhorst, R. A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 90

    2020

  44. [52]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 99

    Jiang, L., Egami, E., Mechtley, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 99

    2013

  45. [53]

    H., et al

    Jiang, L., Finlator, K., Cohen, S. H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 16

    2016

  46. [54]

    2017, ApJ, 846, 134

    Jiang, L., Shen, Y., Bian, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 134

    2017

  47. [55]

    C., Bunker, A

    Jones, G. C., Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A238

    2024

  48. [56]

    M., Bagley, M., et al

    Kartaltepe, J., Casey, C. M., Bagley, M., et al. 2021, COSMOS-Webb: The Webb Cosmic Origins Survey, JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. #1727, ,

    2021

  49. [57]

    2011, ApJ, 734, 119 14 Ning et al

    Kashikawa, N., Shimasaku, K., Matsuda, Y., et al. 2011, ApJ, 734, 119 14 Ning et al

    2011

  50. [58]

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. E. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22

    1994

  51. [59]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541

    1998

  52. [60]

    2023, ApJS, 268, 24

    Kikuta, S., Ouchi, M., Shibuya, T., et al. 2023, ApJS, 268, 24

    2023

  53. [61]

    J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J

    Kim, K. J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., & Yang, H. 2021, ApJ, 914, 2

    2021

  54. [62]

    Y., Jones, D

    Kong, M. Y., Jones, D. O., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.11261

    2026

  55. [63]

    G., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., et al

    Kramarenko, I. G., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05403

    2025

  56. [64]

    Lange, J. U. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3181

    2023

  57. [65]

    Leitherer, C., & Heckman, T. M. 1995, ApJS, 96, 9

    1995

  58. [66]

    J., Austin, D., et al

    Li, Q., Conselice, C. J., Austin, D., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag311

    2026

  59. [67]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25647

    Llerena, M., Pentericci, L., Amorín, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25647

    2025 arXiv

  60. [68]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 106

    Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., & Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 498, 106

    1998

  61. [69]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.13778

    Markov, V., Bradač, M., Estrada-Carpenter, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.13778

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02322

    Marques-Chaves, R., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02322

    2026

  63. [71]

    L., Sawicki, M., Dressler, A., & McCarthy, P

    Martin, C. L., Sawicki, M., Dressler, A., & McCarthy, P. 2008, ApJ, 679, 942

    2008

  64. [72]

    J., McLure, R

    McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., & Dunlop, J. S. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3812

    2016

  65. [73]

    2024, A&A, 688, A106

    Napolitano, L., Pentericci, L., Santini, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A106

    2024

  66. [74]

    I., Iani, E., et al

    Navarro-Carrera, R., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 194

    2025

  67. [75]

    2023, ApJL, 944, L1

    Ning, Y., Cai, Z., Jiang, L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L1

    2023

  68. [76]

    2022, ApJ, 926, 230

    Ning, Y., Jiang, L., Zheng, Z.-Y., & Wu, J. 2022, ApJ, 926, 230

    2022

  69. [77]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 4

    Ning, Y., Jiang, L., Zheng, Z.-Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 4

    2020

  70. [78]

    2024, ApJL, 963, L38

    Ning, Y., Cai, Z., Lin, X., et al. 2024, ApJL, 963, L38

    2024

  71. [79]

    A., Bouwens, R

    Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Labbé, I., & Stefanon, M. 2018, ApJ, 855, 105

    2018

  72. [80]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  73. [81]

    2019, Saas-Fee Advanced Course, 46, 189

    Ouchi, M. 2019, Saas-Fee Advanced Course, 46, 189

    2019

  74. [82]

    B., & Peebles, P

    Partridge, R. B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1967, ApJ, 147, 868

    1967

  75. [83]

    2018, A&A, 619, A147

    Pentericci, L., Vanzella, E., Castellano, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A147

    2018

  76. [84]

    A., Strait, V., et al

    Prieto-Lyon, G., Mason, C. A., Strait, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.18302

    2025

  77. [85]

    E., Malhotra, S., Dey, A., et al

    Rhoads, J. E., Malhotra, S., Dey, A., et al. 2000, ApJL, 545, L85

    2000

  78. [86]

    E., Xu, C., Dawson, S., et al

    Rhoads, J. E., Xu, C., Dawson, S., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 59

    2004

  79. [87]

    J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al

    Rieke, M. J., Robertson, B., Tacchella, S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 16

    2023

  80. [88]

    I., van Mierlo, S

    Rinaldi, P., Caputi, K. I., van Mierlo, S. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 128

    2022

  81. [89]

    E., Hayes, M., Östlin, G., et al

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Hayes, M., Östlin, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 14

    2015

  82. [90]

    J., Mehta, V., et al

    Runnholm, A., Hayes, M. J., Mehta, V., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 95

    2025

  83. [91]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 6295

    Saldana-Lopez, A., Schaerer, D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 6295

    2023

  84. [92]

    Sarrouh, G. T. E., Asada, Y., Martis, N. S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 282, 3

    2026

  85. [93]

    2025, MNRAS, arXiv:2506.03242

    Shimizu, S., Kashikawa, N., Kikuta, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, arXiv:2506.03242

    2025

  86. [94]

    Adelberger, K. L. 1996, ApJL, 462, L17

    1996

  87. [95]

    2005, PASJ, 57, 165

    Taniguchi, Y., Ajiki, M., Nagao, T., et al. 2005, PASJ, 57, 165

    2005

  88. [96]

    E., Hibon, P., et al

    Tilvi, V., Rhoads, J. E., Hibon, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1853

    2010

  89. [97]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301

    2024

  90. [98]

    Valentino, F., Brammer, G., Gould, K. M. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 20 Ďurovčíková, D., Eilers, A.-C., Chen, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 162

    2023

  91. [99]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L34

    Wang, B., Fujimoto, S., Labbé, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L34

    2023

  92. [100]

    2024, A&A, 683, A169

    Wang, W., Wylezalek, D., De Breuck, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A169

    2024

  93. [101]

    J., Doyon, R., Albert, L., et al

    Willott, C. J., Doyon, R., Albert, L., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 025002

    2022

  94. [102]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 27

    Witstok, J., Maiolino, R., Smit, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 27

    2025

  95. [103]

    2017, ApJ, 844, 171

    Yang, H., Malhotra, S., Gronke, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 171

    2017

  96. [104]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07970

    Zhao, C., Huang, S., He, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07970

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.01487

    Zhu, S., Zheng, Z.-Y., Bian, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.01487

    2026

  98. [106]

    D., Bosman, S

    Zhu, Y., Becker, G. D., Bosman, S. E. I., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, L49

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed May 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.