Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 45 references

Efficient GHz electro-optical modulation with a nonlocal lithium niobate metasurface in the linear and nonlinear regime

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single lithium-niobate metasurface modulates both reflected telecom light and its second harmonic at gigahertz speeds with less than 10 volts.

desk verdict A credible first demonstration of CW-pumped electrically modulated SHG in an LNOI metasurface, but the abstract's order-of-magnitude SHG claim exceeds the data; fix the numbers and it's a solid paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03422 v1 pith:7TLOBVTC submitted 2024-12-04 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Agostino Di Francescantonio , Alessandra Sabatti , Helena Weigand , Elise Bailly , Maria Antonietta Vincenti , Luca Carletti , Jost Kellner , Attilio Zilli
show 3 more authors
Marco Finazzi Michele Celebrano Rachel Grange
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 78.20.Jq42.79.Hp42.65.Ky
keywords lithiumniobatemetasurfaceelectro-opticmodulationPockelseffectboundstatesinthecontinuumsecond-harmonicgenerationguided-moderesonanceCMOS-compatiblephotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a flat, free-space electro-optic modulator made from a single 600 nm layer of lithium niobate patterned into an asymmetric array of nanowires. The device supports a nearly dark (quasi-bound-state-in-the-continuum) resonance with a quality factor above 8000, so that a few volts applied through CMOS-compatible electrodes shift the resonance enough to change the reflected power by about 10 per cent at gigahertz speeds. The same shift also modulates the intensity of the second harmonic generated by a continuous-wave pump, producing more than an order-of-magnitude change in the upconverted signal. Because lithium niobate is an established, transparent electro-optic material with a large Pockels coefficient, the result suggests that nonlocal metasurfaces can close the performance gap between bulk or on-chip modulators and free-space flat optics. If confirmed, this makes ultrafast electrical control of free-space light, both fundamental and frequency-upconverted, available in a compact, CMOS-compatible platform.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is a quasi-bound-state-in-the-continuum guided-mode resonance (a dark guided mode made weakly radiating by breaking its symmetry) in a one-dimensional lithium-niobate-on-insulator grating. The grating is an asymmetric pair of nanowires with period 800 nm, fill factor 0.3, and asymmetry around 0.2 on a 450 nm lithium-niobate film over silicon dioxide on silicon; the asymmetry opens a controllable radiative channel, giving a sharp Fano line shape with Q near $10^{4}$. The Pockels effect shifts this resonance: the static field applied along the crystal z-axis changes the extraordinary index by half the cube of the index times the effective electro-optic coefficient times the field, displacing the resonance peak by a fraction of its linewidth per volt. In-plane interdigitated electrodes produce a uniform static field across the film, maximizing overlap with the confined optical mode. The same resonance shift is then read out twice: directly in reflectivity at a fixed wavelength, and squared in second-harmonic generation, where the quadratic field dependence sharpens the effective spectral linewidth and amplifies the modulation depth.

What would settle it

Record the full reflected spectrum while a DC bias is swept, and test whether the Fano-fit background parameters (offset and phase) remain constant; if they move with voltage, the reported 5.6 pm/V shift and the derived efficiencies collapse, whereas a stationary background with a linearly moving resonance peak confirms the Pockels mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a monolithically patterned lithium-niobate-on-insulator metasurface can act as a high-speed electro-optic modulator in both the linear and nonlinear regimes. The metasurface uses a guided-mode resonance whose symmetry-protected dark character is broken by a small asymmetry between neighbouring nanowires, turning it into a quasi-BIC with a theoretical Q of 11000 (measured Q greater than 8000) and a spectral width of about 0.18 nm near 1553 nm. An applied bias shifts the resonance through the Pockels effect, with a measured tuning sensitivity of 5.6 pm/V; this yields a relative reflectivity modulation of about 0.12 at 20 V peak-to-peak and a linear modulation efficiency of about 0.015 per volt, with a 3 dB bandwidth around 800 MHz and measurable response beyond 1.4 GHz. For the nonlinear response, pumping the same resonance with a narrow-linewidth continuous-wave laser at 12 kW/cm squared produces second-harmonic light whose excitation linewidth is about 0.14 nm, narrower than the fundamental resonance; applying a static bias of 9 V modulates the second-harmonic intensity by more than a factor of five on resonance and by more than 1.1 on the resonance slopes, corresponding to a modulation efficiency greater than 0.12 per volt. The paper therefore establishes that the same electrical signal can control both the fundamental reflection and the upconverted emission of a free-space metasurface.

Load-bearing premise

The extracted tuning sensitivity of 5.6 pm/V assumes the broad Fabry-Perot background in the measured spectrum is completely unmodulated; if that background responds to the applied voltage, the reported modulation efficiencies would be inflated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single all-dielectric flat device can modulate a free-space telecom beam with a relative reflectivity swing of about 0.1 and a modulation efficiency above 0.01 per volt at CMOS-compatible voltages.
  • The same bias shifts the resonance enough to modulate continuous-wave second-harmonic emission by more than an order of magnitude, with efficiency around 0.12 per volt.
  • The quasi-BIC resonance, with Q above 8000 and a linewidth below 0.2 nm, makes the modulation sensitive to sub-nanometre refractive-index changes, so the required voltages stay below 10 V.
  • Because second-harmonic generation responds quadratically to the resonance field, the nonlinear modulation depth exceeds the linear one, and it can be driven by a low-power continuous-wave pump rather than pulsed lasers.
  • Electrode capacitance currently limits the 3 dB electrical bandwidth to about 800 MHz; reducing the 1.5 mm electrode length should extend the speed further.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: suppressing the unmodulated reflectance background, for example with a buried reflector or a transmission configuration, should recover a large part of the five-fold gap between measured and simulated linear modulation.
  • Beyond the paper: the same resonance-shift mechanism should apply to sum-frequency and difference-frequency generation, since the nonlinear gain is set by the resonance linewidth and the Pockels coefficient rather than by the specific harmonic process.
  • Beyond the paper: the second-harmonic modulation depth should scale quadratically with the continuous-wave pump power at fixed bias; measuring that scaling would directly test the claim that the effect enters through the resonance-enhanced fundamental field.
  • Beyond the paper: shortening the 1.5 mm interdigitated electrodes should push the 3 dB bandwidth beyond 800 MHz, with the trade-off that the illuminated area must stay large enough to preserve the nonlocal resonance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a monolithic lithium-niobate-on-insulator (LNOI) metasurface supporting a quasi-bound-state-in-the-continuum resonance, and demonstrates electro-optic modulation of the reflected fundamental and of the second-harmonic signal. The linear characterization yields Q > 8000, a resonance shift of about 0.05 nm for a 9 V bias, a relative reflectivity modulation of up to about 0.12 for Vpp = 20 V with a low-voltage efficiency near 0.015 V^-1, and a 3-dB bandwidth around 800 MHz. The SHG experiments show a factor-of-5 reduction on resonance and a relative variation greater than 1.1 on the resonance slopes under ±9 V DC bias. The abstract and conclusion claim 'more than one order of magnitude' SHG intensity modulation and fast modulation of both linear and nonlinear signals, but these statements are not supported by the numbers reported in the body.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are corrected, this is a valuable demonstration: it uses a standard LNOI platform, top-down fabrication, CMOS-compatible voltages, and independent COMSOL simulations based on literature values for electro-optic and nonlinear coefficients, with no fitting of the target effect to the data. The measured linear modulation depth, bandwidth, and quality factor are credible and represent a useful step toward free-space electro-optic modulators. The SHG modulation result is interesting even at the reduced factor-of-5 or factor-of-2 levels actually demonstrated, because it shows that Pockels control of nonlinear upconversion is possible with a CW pump. The main weakness is the overstatement of the SHG modulation depth and the unsupported claim of fast nonlinear modulation, not the underlying experiment.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusion, SHG modulation (Fig. 4)] The abstract states 'more than one order of magnitude intensity modulation of the second harmonic' and the conclusion states 'a SHG intensity modulation exceeding one order of magnitude by applying ΔVEO = 9 V bias'. These claims are contradicted by the body: on resonance the paper reports 'a reduction up to a factor of 5' for ΔVDC = ±9 V (Fig. 4e), and on the slopes it reports (P_SH(9V) − P_SH(0V))/P_SH(0V) > 1.1 (Fig. 4d,f), i.e., an increase by a factor of about 2.1. Neither value reaches a factor of 10. The stated efficiency η > 0.12 V^-1 is computed from the 110% slope change, so it corresponds to the factor-2.1 effect, not to a decade-scale modulation. This quantitative overstatement is load-bearing because the SHG modulation depth is one of the two headline results; the text should be corrected to report the actually demonstrated factors (about 5 on resonance, about 2.1 on the slopes).
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract claims that the metasurface 'achieve[s] fast electrical modulation of both linear and nonlinear optical properties', and the conclusion says 'high-speed, efficient EO modulation'. However, the linear modulation is the only quantity characterized as a function of frequency (Fig. 3f, up to about 1 GHz). The SHG modulation is demonstrated only under static DC bias (Fig. 4c-f); no AC or frequency-resolved measurement of the modulated SHG is presented anywhere in the paper. The claim of fast nonlinear modulation is therefore unsupported and should be removed or explicitly qualified as DC-only until such a measurement is provided.
  3. [Design and linear characterization, Fig. 3a,d] The tuning sensitivity ΔλEO/ΔV = 5.6 pm/V is extracted from Fano fits to reflectance spectra recorded at different DC biases. The text notes that the shift is 'superimposed to an unmodulated instrumental artifact' and that the measured linear modulation is about five times smaller than simulation due to a 'high level of unmodulated reflectance' (Fig. 3c,d). This assumes that the broad Fabry–Pérot background is strictly bias-independent, but no control experiment or error analysis is provided to support that assumption. If the background changes with bias, the extracted resonance shift and hence the reported tuning sensitivity and the comparison with the simulated 0.06 nm shift would be inaccurate. The direct lock-in modulation measurement at the derivative extrema is less affected, but the paper should either demonstrate background stability or quantify the sensitivity of the extracted shift to the background parameters.
  4. [SHG modulation, Conclusion] The conclusion states 'we report the first experimental demonstration of electrically modulated SHG in subwavelength devices using CW pumping [40]'. This claim is not adequately supported in the manuscript: Ref. [40] demonstrates continuous-wave SHG in a gallium-phosphide metasurface, but not electro-optic modulation, while Ref. [39], cited nearby, is titled 'Electro-optically Modulated Nonlinear Metasurfaces'. The authors should clarify what precisely is claimed as 'first' (e.g., first CW-pumped EO-modulated SHG in a lithium niobate metasurface) and explicitly distinguish their result from Ref. [39]; otherwise the novelty claim should be softened.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The sentence 'Our experimental results reveal a modulation efficiency exceeding 10%, driven by less than 10 V' is inconsistent with the paper's own definition of efficiency as relative modulation per applied volt, and with the later number of 0.07 modulation at Vpp = 10 V. Please clarify whether 10% refers to modulation depth or efficiency, and use consistent units.
  2. [Figure 4 caption] The caption of Fig. 4a says 'sample with FF = 0.3 and α = 0', but the text and the rest of the paper refer to the sample with α = 0.19. This appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [SHG modulation section] The phrase 'good agreement with the nonlinear simulation under same excitation conditions (a factor 2 higher)' is internally contradictory: a factor-of-2 discrepancy is not 'good agreement'. Please report the simulated value separately and describe the discrepancy quantitatively.
  4. [SHG modulation section] The sentence 'Importantly, the low SHG signal outside the resonance leads to a high modulation efficiency, close to the simulated value' is confusing because the preceding sentence states that off-resonant excitation shows 'no electro-optic modulation thereof'. Please clarify which condition yields the high efficiency and how the off-resonant background affects it.
  5. [Methods] There are minor language issues: 'We models a plane-wave excitation' should be 'We model', and 'in herent' should be 'inherent'. The duplicated reference [32]/[34] (same Huang et al. paper) should also be merged.
  6. [SHG modulation section] The efficiency definition for the SHG modulation uses ΔVDC = 9 V while the linear efficiency uses Vpp/2. Please state explicitly whether the quoted efficiencies are referenced to the peak voltage excursion or to the peak-to-peak voltage, and keep the convention consistent across the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured EO tuning and SHG modulation are checked against independent COMSOL simulations using literature coefficients, not against fitted versions of the target results.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are experimental observables, not outputs of a derivation whose inputs contain the same observables. The linear resonance shift is extracted by Fano fitting of measured reflectance spectra (Fig. 3a) and is compared with a COMSOL simulation (Fig. 3b) that uses literature electro-optic coefficients (r13=10.3 pm/V, r33=34.1 pm/V) and the measured geometry; the reported 5.6 pm/V is a measurement, and the simulated shift is an independent prediction. The SHG modulation (Fig. 4c-f) is measured directly and compared with a nonlinear simulation based on literature d33=-27 pm/V and d22=2.1 pm/V; no fitted parameter from the experiment is inserted into the model to reproduce the data. Citations to related work by overlapping authors ([25], [26], [28], [31]) supply design expectations (e.g., 'assuming a tuning sensitivity ΔλEO/ΔVEO ≈ 0.01 nm/V [26][28]') and physical context, but they do not by themselves force the measured results; the cited values are experimentally falsifiable and are used only for design, not as the target claim. The Fano-fit extraction assumes a voltage-independent background, and the paper itself notes a 'high level of unmodulated reflectance' that makes the measured linear modulation five times smaller than simulation; this is an experimental systematic uncertainty, not a circularity. Separately, as a non-circular correctness flag, the abstract/conclusion claim of 'more than one order of magnitude intensity modulation' of SHG is not supported by the paper's own reported factor-of-5 on-resonance reduction and the >1.1 relative slope variation (about a factor of 2.1); this is a quantitative-overstatement issue, not a derivation loop. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained: the simulations use external material constants and measured geometry, and the experiments are compared with, not fitted into, those simulations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters were fit to data in this paper. All material coefficients and geometry are either measured or taken from prior literature, and the quoted tuning sensitivity is a measured value. The main modeling simplifications are listed as axioms above.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Pockels effect: index change is Δn = -0.5 n^3 r_eff E_EO, with r13=10.3 pm/V and r33=34.1 pm/V at 1.32 μm applied at 1550 nm.
    Used in Eq. (1) and step 1 of simulations; EO coefficients at 1550 nm are assumed equal to values at 1.32 μm [44].
  • standard math Sellmeier equations for LiNbO3 refractive indices.
    Used in simulations for dispersion of n_o and n_e [41].
  • domain assumption Quasi-BIC mode theory: asymmetric nanowire widths turn a symmetry-protected BIC into a leaky resonance with finite Q.
    Basis of the design in Figure 2e; established in BIC metasurface literature.
  • domain assumption Undepleted pump approximation for SHG.
    SHG current density uses fundamental field from linear simulation, ignoring pump depletion; stated in Methods step 3.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform static electric field in LiNbO3, represented by its average value.
    The simulations extract the averaged E_EO field and apply it to compute the refractive index change; this simplification is acknowledged in Methods step 2.
  • domain assumption Literature d-coefficients at 1.313 μm (d31=-4.3 pm/V, d33=-27 pm/V) and d22=2.1 pm/V apply at 1550 nm.
    Stated in Methods: 'the second order nonlinear coefficients d_ij are unknown at 1.5 μm'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient GHz electro-optical modulation with a nonlocal lithium niobate metasurface in the linear and nonlinear regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7TLOBVTC

@misc{pith2026241203422,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient GHz electro-optical modulation with a nonlocal lithium niobate metasurface in the linear and nonlinear regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7TLOBVTC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03422}
}
read the original abstract

Electro-optical modulation is widely employed for optical signal processing and in laser technology. To date, it is efficiently realized in integrated photonic systems as well as in bulk optics devices. Yet, the achievement of modulators exploiting Pockels effect in flat optics, essential to scale down the electric radiation-optical control in free space, currently lag behind bulk and on-chip integrated platforms in terms efficiency and speed. We bridge this gap realizing a metasurface based on lithium niobate (LiNbO3) on insulator that leverages on resonances with quality-factor as high as 8e3 to achieve fast electrical modulation of both linear and nonlinear optical properties. LiNbO3, well known for its high nonlinear susceptibility and wide transparency window across the infrared and visible spectrum, is employed to realize an asymmetric, one-dimensional array of nanowires, exhibiting resonances with linewidth < 0.2 nm. By applying a CMOS-compatible electrical bias, the metasurface imparts a relative reflectivity modulation around 0.1, with a modulation efficiency, defined as relative modulation per applied Volt, larger than 0.01 V^-1 on a bandwidth of about 1 GHz. We also demonstrated more than one order of magnitude intensity modulation of the second harmonic seeded by a continuous-wave laser, with a modulation efficiency of about 0.12 V^-1. This dual modulation capability, rooted in the interplay between optical resonances and electric field manipulation, holds significant potential for cutting-edge applications in high-speed photonics, nonlinear optics, and reconfigurable communication systems. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of LiNbO3-based metasurfaces for integration into next-generation optical technologies that demand rapid, efficient electrical control of light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03422 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. illustrates the design and working principle of our device. We investigate a nonlocal lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) metasurface made by asymmetric, periodically arranged nanostripes obtained from an x-cut LiNbO3 thin film on a finite SiO2 layer on top of a Si substrate (Figure 1a). We aim at observing efficient and fast electric modulation of the metasurface optical properties induced by a control voltage, VEO… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Characterization of the reflected signal modulation by applying DC and AC electrical stimuli [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. a) Spectrum of the reflected signal from the sample with FF = 0.3 and α = 0. b) Normalized SHG excitation spectrum, obtained by sweeping the wavelength of the fundamental beam with a constant optical intensity on the sample of 12 kW/cm2 . c–f) EO modulation of SHG, excited with four different wavelengths (identified by vertical dashed lines in panels a, b) depending on the applied DC voltage VDC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Electro-optically Modulated Nonlinear Metasurfaces,

    Z. He et al., “Electro-optically Modulated Nonlinear Metasurfaces, ” Nano Lett, vol. 24, no. 45, pp. 14215–14221, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03369

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03369 2024

  2. [40]

    Continuous Wave Second Harmonic Generation Enabled by Quasi-Bound- States in the Continuum on Gallium Phosphide Metasurfaces,

    A. P . Anthur et al., “Continuous Wave Second Harmonic Generation Enabled by Quasi-Bound- States in the Continuum on Gallium Phosphide Metasurfaces, ” Nano Lett, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 8745–8751, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03601

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03601 2020

  3. [1]

    Roadmap on photonic metasurfaces,

    S. A. Schulz et al., “Roadmap on photonic metasurfaces, ” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 124, no. 26, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0204694

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0204694 2024

  4. [2]

    Space and Time Modulations of Light with Metasurfaces: Recent Progress and Future Prospects,

    E. Mikheeva, C. Kyrou, F . Bentata, S. Khadir, S. Cueff, and P . Genevet, “Space and Time Modulations of Light with Metasurfaces: Recent Progress and Future Prospects, ” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1458–1482, May 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01833

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01833 2022

  5. [3]

    Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface,

    S.-Q. Li, X. Xu, R. Maruthiyodan Veetil, V . Valuckas, R. Paniagua-Domínguez, and A. I. Kuznetsov, “Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface, ” Science (1979), vol. 364, no. 6445, pp. 1087–1090, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1126/science.aaw6747

    doi:10.1126/science.aaw6747 1979

  6. [4]

    Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials,

    Q. Wang et al., “Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials, ” Nat Photonics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 60–65, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.247

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.247 2015

  7. [5]

    Electrically programmable solid-state metasurfaces via flash localised heating,

    K. Zangeneh Kamali et al., “Electrically programmable solid-state metasurfaces via flash localised heating, ” Light Sci Appl, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 40, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41377-023- 01078-6

    doi:10.1038/s41377-023- 2023

  8. [6]

    Optical tuning of dielectric nanoantennas for thermo-optically reconfigurable nonlinear metasurfaces,

    M. Celebrano et al., “Optical tuning of dielectric nanoantennas for thermo-optically reconfigurable nonlinear metasurfaces, ” Opt Lett, vol. 46, no. 10, p. 2453, May 2021, doi: 10.1364/OL.420790

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.420790 2021

Show all 45 references
  1. [7]

    Electrically tunable space–time metasurfaces at optical frequencies,

    J. Sisler, P . Thureja, M. Y . Grajower, R. Sokhoyan, I. Huang, and H. A. Atwater, “Electrically tunable space–time metasurfaces at optical frequencies, ” Nat Nanotechnol, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41565-024-01728-9

    2024 doi

  2. [8]

    Gigahertz free-space electro-optic modulators based on Mie resonances,

    I.-C. Benea-Chelmus et al., “Gigahertz free-space electro-optic modulators based on Mie resonances, ” Nat Commun, vol. 13, no. 1, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30451-z

    2022 doi

  3. [9]

    All-Dielectric Active Terahertz Photonics Driven by Bound States in the Continuum,

    S. Han et al., “All-Dielectric Active Terahertz Photonics Driven by Bound States in the Continuum,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 37, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1002/adma.201901921

    2019 doi

  4. [10]

    Ultrafast, All Optically Reconfigurable, Nonlinear Nanoantenna,

    E. A. A. Pogna et al., “Ultrafast, All Optically Reconfigurable, Nonlinear Nanoantenna, ” ACS Nano, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 11150–11157, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03386

    2021 doi

  5. [11]

    All-optical free-space routing of upconverted light by metasurfaces via nonlinear interferometry,

    A. Di Francescantonio et al., “All-optical free-space routing of upconverted light by metasurfaces via nonlinear interferometry, ” Nat Nanotechnol, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 298–305, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41565-023-01549-2

    2024 doi

  6. [12]

    Chapter 11 - The Electrooptic and Photorefractive Effects,

    R. W. Boyd, “Chapter 11 - The Electrooptic and Photorefractive Effects, ” in Nonlinear Optics (Third Edition), Third Edition., R. W. Boyd, Ed., Burlington: Academic Press, 2008, pp. 511–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369470-6.00011-3

    2008 doi

  7. [13]

    110 GHz CMOS compatible thin film LiNbO3 modulator on silicon,

    A. J. Mercante, P . Yao, S. Shi, G. Schneider, J. Murakowski, and D. W. Prather, “110 GHz CMOS compatible thin film LiNbO3 modulator on silicon, ” Opt Express, vol. 24, no. 14, p. 15590, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1364/OE.24.015590

    2016 doi

  8. [14]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS- compatible voltages,

    C. Wang et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS- compatible voltages, ” Nature, vol. 562, no. 7725, pp. 101–104, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41586- 018-0551-y

    2018 doi

  9. [15]

    Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum,

    A. Boes et al., “Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum, ” Science (1979), vol. 379, no. 6627, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1126/science.abj4396

    1979 doi

  10. [16]

    Evaluation of crystals of LiNbo3 doped with MgO or TiO2 for electrooptic devices,

    R. J. Holmes, Y . S. Kim, C. D. Brandle, and D. M. Smyth, “Evaluation of crystals of LiNbo3 doped with MgO or TiO2 for electrooptic devices, ” Ferroelectrics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 41–45, Nov. 1983, doi: 10.1080/00150198308009051

    1983 doi

  11. [17]

    Simplified characterization of uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear optical crystals: a plea for standardization of nomenclature and conventions,

    D. A. Roberts, “Simplified characterization of uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear optical crystals: a plea for standardization of nomenclature and conventions, ” IEEE J Quantum Electron, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2057–2074, 1992, doi: 10.1109/3.159516

    1992 doi

  12. [18]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators: when performance meets scalability,

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, P . Kharel, D. Zhu, and M. Lončar, “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators: when performance meets scalability, ” Optica, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 652, May 2021, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.415762

    2021 doi

  13. [19]

    Lithium Niobate Meta-O p t i c s ,

    A. Fedotova et al., “Lithium Niobate Meta-O p t i c s ,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 3745–3763, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00835

    2022 doi

  14. [20]

    500 GHz plasmonic Mach-Zehnder modulator enabling sub-THz microwave photonics,

    M. Burla et al., “500 GHz plasmonic Mach-Zehnder modulator enabling sub-THz microwave photonics, ” APL Photonics, vol. 4, no. 5, May 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5086868

    2019 doi

  15. [21]

    Sub-1 Volt and high-bandwidth visible to near-infrared electro-optic modulators,

    D. Renaud et al., “Sub-1 Volt and high-bandwidth visible to near-infrared electro-optic modulators, ” Nat Commun, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1496, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36870- w

    2023 doi

  16. [22]

    Nanoimprinting Solution-Derived Barium Titanate for Electro-Optic Metasurfaces,

    H. C. Weigand, Ü.-L. Talts, A.-L. Vieli, V . V Vogler-Neuling, A. Nardi, and R. Grange, “Nanoimprinting Solution-Derived Barium Titanate for Electro-Optic Metasurfaces, ” Nano Lett., vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 5536–5542, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00711

    2024 doi

  17. [23]

    A strong electro-optically active lead-free ferroelectric integrated on silicon,

    S. Abel et al., “A strong electro-optically active lead-free ferroelectric integrated on silicon, ” Nat Commun, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1671, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1038/ncomms2695

    2013 doi

  18. [24]

    Benzocyclobutene barrier layer for suppressing conductance in nonlinear optical devices during electric field poling,

    W. Jin et al., “Benzocyclobutene barrier layer for suppressing conductance in nonlinear optical devices during electric field poling, ” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 104, no. 24, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4884829

    2014 doi

  19. [25]

    Enhanced Electro-Optic Modulation in Resonant Metasurfaces of Lithium N i o b a t e ,

    H. Weigand et al., “Enhanced Electro-Optic Modulation in Resonant Metasurfaces of Lithium N i o b a t e ,” ACS Photonics, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3004–3009, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00935

    2021 doi

  20. [26]

    Tunable Metasurface Using Thin-Film Lithium Niobate in the Telecom Regime,

    A. Weiss et al., “Tunable Metasurface Using Thin-Film Lithium Niobate in the Telecom Regime, ” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 605–612, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01582

    2022 doi

  21. [27]

    High quality factor resonant metasurface with etchless lithium niobate,

    X. Chen et al., “High quality factor resonant metasurface with etchless lithium niobate, ” Opt Laser Technol, vol. 161, p. 109163, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109163

    2023

  22. [28]

    Electro-optic lithium niobate metasurfaces,

    B. Gao, M. Ren, W. Wu, W. Cai, and J. Xu, “Electro-optic lithium niobate metasurfaces, ” Science China, vol. 64, no. 4, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11433-021-1668-y

    2021 doi

  23. [29]

    The electro-optic spatial light modulator of lithium niobate metasurface based on plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum,

    Y. J u et al., “The electro-optic spatial light modulator of lithium niobate metasurface based on plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum, ” Nanoscale, vol. 15, no. 34, pp. 13965–13970, 2023, doi: 10.1039/D3NR02278A

    2023 doi

  24. [30]

    Surface-normal plasmonic modulator using sub-wavelength metal grating on electro-optic polymer thin film,

    F . Ren et al., “Surface-normal plasmonic modulator using sub-wavelength metal grating on electro-optic polymer thin film, ” Opt Commun, vol. 352, pp. 116–120, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.04.058

    2015 doi

  25. [31]

    Extremely high extinction ratio electro-optic modulator via frequency upconversion to visible wavelengths,

    A. Sabatti et al., “Extremely high extinction ratio electro-optic modulator via frequency upconversion to visible wavelengths, ” Opt Lett, vol. 49, no. 14, p. 3870, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1364/OL.525733

    2024 doi

  26. [33]

    Infinite-Q guided modes radiate in the continuum,

    K. Sun et al., “Infinite-Q guided modes radiate in the continuum, ” Phys Rev B, vol. 107, no. 11, p. 115415, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115415

    2023 doi

  27. [34]

    Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All-dielectric metasurface,

    L. Huang et al., “Ultrahigh-Q guided mode resonances in an All-dielectric metasurface, ” Nat Commun, vol. 14, no. 1, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39227-5

    2023 doi

  28. [35]

    Rigorous coupled-wave analysis of planar-grating diffraction,

    M. G. Moharam and T. K. Gaylord, “Rigorous coupled-wave analysis of planar-grating diffraction, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 71, no. 7, p. 811, Jul. 1981, doi: 10.1364/josa.71.000811

    1981 doi

  29. [36]

    Nonlinear Metasurfaces Governed by Bound States in the Continuum,

    K. Koshelev, Y . Tang, K. Li, D.-Y . Choi, G. Li, and Y . Kivshar, “Nonlinear Metasurfaces Governed by Bound States in the Continuum, ” ACS Photonics, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1639–1644, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00700

    2019 doi

  30. [37]

    Redeposition-free inductively-coupled plasma etching of lithium niobate for integrated photonics,

    F . Kaufmann, G. Finco, A. Maeder, and R. Grange, “Redeposition-free inductively-coupled plasma etching of lithium niobate for integrated photonics, ” Nanophotonics, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1601–1611, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2022-0676

    2023 doi

  31. [38]

    Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts,

    U. Fano, “Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts, ” Physical Review, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 1866–1878, Dec. 1961, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866

    1961 doi

  32. [41]

    Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol% magnesium oxide –doped lithium niobate,

    D. E. Zelmon, D. L. Small, and D. Jundt, “Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol% magnesium oxide –doped lithium niobate, ” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 3319, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.14.003319

    1997 doi

  33. [42]

    Uncertainty analysis for the coefficient of band-to-band absorption of crystalline silicon,

    C. Schinke et al., “Uncertainty analysis for the coefficient of band-to-band absorption of crystalline silicon, ” AIP Adv, vol. 5, no. 6, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1063/1.4923379

    2015 doi

  34. [43]

    Infrared Refractive Indexes of Silicon Germanium and Modified Selenium Glass* ,

    C. D. Salzberg and J. J. Villa, “Infrared Refractive Indexes of Silicon Germanium and Modified Selenium Glass* , ” J Opt Soc Am, vol. 47, no. 3, p. 244, Mar. 1957, doi: 10.1364/JOSA.47.000244

    1957 doi

  35. [44]

    Electro-optic coefficients of lithium tantalate at near-infrared wavelengths,

    J. L. Casson et al., “Electro-optic coefficients of lithium tantalate at near-infrared wavelengths, ” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 1948, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.21.001948

    1948 doi

  36. [45]

    Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients,

    I. Shoji, T. Kondo, A. Kitamoto, M. Shirane, and R. Ito, “Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients, ” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 14, no. 9, p. 2268, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.14.002268

    1997 doi

  37. [46]

    M. J. Weber, Handbook of Optical Materials. CRC Press, 2018. doi: 10.1201/9781315219615

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.