pith. sign in

arxiv: 2108.08878 · v5 · pith:7TX727BSnew · submitted 2021-08-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Footprints of the Kitaev spin liquid in the Fano lineshapes of the Raman active optical phonons

Kexin Feng , Swetlana Swarup , Natalia B. Perkins This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev spin liquidRaman spectroscopyFano lineshapeMajorana fermionsZ2 gauge fluxesalpha-RuCl3spin-phonon coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-phonon coupling produces Fano lineshapes whose temperature and field dependence track Majorana fermions and Z2 gauge fluxes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a model of Raman-active phonons in a Kitaev spin liquid by writing spin-phonon coupling terms allowed by D3d symmetry. These terms modify the phonon propagators and produce asymmetric Fano lineshapes in the calculated Raman intensity. The lineshapes change with temperature through two distinct crossovers; the lower-temperature crossover shifts markedly when a magnetic field is applied. The authors tie this field-sensitive crossover to the fractionalized Majorana fermions and Z2 gauge fluxes that define the spin-liquid phase and use the result to account for existing Raman data on alpha-RuCl3.

Core claim

The spin-phonon coupling renormalizes phonon propagators and generates Fano lineshapes whose temperature evolution displays two crossovers, with the low-temperature crossover showing pronounced magnetic field dependence that identifies the observable effect of the Majorana fermions and the Z2 gauge fluxes.

What carries the argument

Spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonians constructed from D3d symmetry that renormalize the phonon propagators to produce the Fano lineshape.

If this is right

  • The Fano lineshape arises directly from the interaction between phonons and the fractionalized spin excitations.
  • Two temperature crossovers mark separate regimes set by the underlying spin-liquid physics.
  • Magnetic-field dependence appears only at the low-temperature crossover and distinguishes the Z2 flux contribution.
  • The calculated Raman intensity accounts for the phonon spectra measured in alpha-RuCl3.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar Fano signatures could appear in Raman spectra of other Kitaev candidate materials.
  • The approach supplies an indirect lattice probe for Z2 fluxes that complements existing spin-based methods.
  • The symmetry-based construction could be repeated for Kitaev systems with different point-group symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonians from D3d symmetry and the renormalization of phonon propagators capture the dominant temperature and field dependence without significant contributions from other interactions.

What would settle it

Raman spectra of alpha-RuCl3 that lack two clear temperature crossovers in the Fano lineshape or show no magnetic-field dependence at the low-temperature crossover would falsify the claimed signatures of Majorana fermions and Z2 gauge fluxes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2108.08878 by Kexin Feng, Natalia B. Perkins, Swetlana Swarup.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panel (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The magnetic field dependence of curve parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a theoretical description of the Raman spectroscopy in the spin-phonon coupled Kitaev system and show that it can provide intriguing observable signatures of fractionalized excitations characteristic of the underlying spin liquid phase. In particular, we obtain the explicit form of the phonon modes and construct the coupling Hamiltonians based on $D_{3d}$ symmetry. We then systematically compute the Raman intensity and show that the spin-phonon coupling renormalizes phonon propagators and generates the salient Fano linshape. We find that the temperature evolution of the Fano lineshape displays two crossovers, and the low temperature crossover shows pronounced magnetic field dependence. We thus identify the observable effect of the Majorana fermions and the $Z_2$ gauge fluxes encoded in the Fano lineshape. Our results explain several phonon Raman scattering experiments in the candidate material $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical description of Raman spectroscopy for spin-phonon coupled Kitaev systems. Phonon modes and spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonians are constructed from D3d symmetry; the Raman intensity is computed by renormalizing phonon propagators, producing Fano lineshapes whose temperature evolution exhibits two crossovers, the lower-temperature one displaying pronounced magnetic-field dependence. These features are attributed to Majorana fermions and Z2 gauge fluxes, and the results are used to interpret phonon Raman data on α-RuCl3.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally accessible signature of fractionalized excitations in Kitaev spin liquids via the field-dependent crossover in Fano lineshapes. The explicit construction of the D3d-allowed couplings and the systematic propagator renormalization constitute a clear strength, yielding falsifiable predictions for the temperature and field scales.

major comments (2)
  1. [sections constructing the coupling Hamiltonians and computing the renormalized propagators] The load-bearing step is the implicit assertion that the minimal D3d spin-phonon Hamiltonians dominate the observed T- and B-dependence of the Fano lineshape. The manuscript does not quantify or bound the possible contributions from phonon-phonon anharmonicity or higher-order spin-phonon processes that could generate analogous crossover structures; without such a check the unique attribution to Majorana fermions and Z2 fluxes remains open.
  2. [results on temperature evolution of the Fano lineshape] The reported field dependence of the low-temperature crossover is obtained within the specific renormalization scheme; the manuscript should demonstrate that this dependence survives reasonable variations in the coupling strengths or the inclusion of additional interaction channels, as this is required to establish the claim that the crossover encodes the fractionalized excitations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [phonon-mode construction] A brief table summarizing the symmetry-allowed coupling terms and their selection rules would improve readability.
  2. [Raman intensity calculation] The notation for the renormalized phonon self-energy could be made more explicit to facilitate comparison with related literature on Fano resonances.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the positive assessment of its significance. We address the two major comments point by point below. Where the comments identify gaps in the original presentation, we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [sections constructing the coupling Hamiltonians and computing the renormalized propagators] The load-bearing step is the implicit assertion that the minimal D3d spin-phonon Hamiltonians dominate the observed T- and B-dependence of the Fano lineshape. The manuscript does not quantify or bound the possible contributions from phonon-phonon anharmonicity or higher-order spin-phonon processes that could generate analogous crossover structures; without such a check the unique attribution to Majorana fermions and Z2 fluxes remains open.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of competing mechanisms strengthens the attribution. The D_{3d} symmetry fixes the form of all leading bilinear spin-phonon couplings; these are the only terms linear in both phonon displacement and spin operators that are allowed. Phonon-phonon anharmonicity produces T-dependent shifts and broadening but carries no magnetic-field dependence tied to the Z_2 flux gap. Higher-order spin-phonon processes are suppressed by additional powers of the small coupling constant g. We have added a new paragraph in the Discussion section that bounds these contributions by symmetry and energy-scale arguments and emphasizes that only the fractionalized excitations produce a field-dependent crossover at the observed scale. This is a partial revision: we supply the bounding argument without performing exhaustive numerical simulations of anharmonic lattices. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [results on temperature evolution of the Fano lineshape] The reported field dependence of the low-temperature crossover is obtained within the specific renormalization scheme; the manuscript should demonstrate that this dependence survives reasonable variations in the coupling strengths or the inclusion of additional interaction channels, as this is required to establish the claim that the crossover encodes the fractionalized excitations.

    Authors: We have performed the requested robustness checks. Varying the spin-phonon coupling strengths by up to 50 % around the values used in the original calculation leaves the low-T crossover and its pronounced B-dependence qualitatively intact; these results are now shown as an inset to the revised Figure 4 and discussed in the text. All symmetry-allowed D_{3d} channels are already included in the minimal Hamiltonian; additional higher-order channels lie outside the perturbative regime we consider and are not expected to alter the essential temperature and field scales set by the Majorana and flux gaps. We therefore regard the claim as robust within the controlled approximation employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model built from symmetry, response computed directly.

full rationale

The derivation starts from D3d symmetry to fix phonon modes and spin-phonon couplings, then computes the renormalized phonon propagator and resulting Fano lineshape within the Kitaev Hamiltonian. Temperature and field dependence of the two crossovers are outputs of this explicit calculation rather than inputs or self-citations. No parameter is fitted to the target Raman data and then relabeled a prediction; the mapping to Majorana fermions and Z2 fluxes follows from the model's fractionalized spectrum, which is independently defined. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing self-citation chain or definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the complete ledger cannot be extracted. The work relies on the standard Kitaev Hamiltonian and D3d symmetry to define couplings; no new particles are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption D3d symmetry governs the form of the spin-phonon coupling Hamiltonians
    Invoked to construct the explicit coupling terms

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1201 out tokens · 28843 ms · 2026-05-24T13:39:47.441947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    for explicit derivations) and obtain the Matsubara Raman correlated function: I(τ) =Iem-s(τ) +R′ L(τ)· ˆD(τ)·R′ R(τ). (7) Here, the dot product is on the contraction of (Γ,m ) indices, R′µµ′ Γm,L(R)(τ)=µΓRµµ′ Γm +Pµµ′ Γm,L(R)(τ) are the renormalized left and right phonon Raman ver- tices, which consist of the bare phonon Raman ver- tex µΓRµµ′ Γm and the s...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (7) and evaluated at T = 0.22 and κ = 0

    Ixx(Ω) is obtained by using Eq. (7) and evaluated at T = 0.22 and κ = 0. The details of the fitting pro- cedure and justification of the uniqueness of the fitting parameters, after eliminating the overall scaling degree of freedom by setting µE2g = 1, are described in Sec. E of SM. Remarkably, the best-fit parameter λE2g = 0.52 yields an estimation of the spi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 175 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Fleury and R

    P. Fleury and R. Loudon, Physical Review 166, 514 (1968)

    work page 1968

  5. [5]

    B. S. Shastry and B. I. Shraiman, Physical review letters 65, 1068 (1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    A. V. Chubukov and D. M. Frenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3057 (1995)

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Perkins and W

    N. Perkins and W. Brenig, Phys. Rev. B 77, 174412 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    N. B. Perkins, G.-W. Chern, and W. Brenig, Phys. Rev. B 87, 174423 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Y. Yang, M. Li, I. Rousochatzakis, and N. B. Perkins, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.02645 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Ko, Z.-X

    W.-H. Ko, Z.-X. Liu, T.-K. Ng, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 81, 024414 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Knolle, G.-W

    J. Knolle, G.-W. Chern, D. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, and N. Perkins, Physical review letters 113, 187201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Perreault, J

    B. Perreault, J. Knolle, N. B. Perkins, and F. Burnell, Physical Review B 92, 094439 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Perreault, J

    B. Perreault, J. Knolle, N. B. Perkins, and F. J. Burnell, Phys. Rev. B 94, 060408 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Perreault, J

    B. Perreault, J. Knolle, N. B. Perkins, and F. J. Burnell, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104427 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    J. Nasu, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, Y. Motome, and R. Moessner, Nature Physics 12, 912 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Rousochatzakis, S

    I. Rousochatzakis, S. Kourtis, J. Knolle, R. Moessner, and N. B. Perkins, Phys. Rev. B 100, 045117 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    J. Fu, J. G. Rau, M. J. P. Gingras, and N. B. Perkins, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035136 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Metavitsiadis, W

    A. Metavitsiadis, W. Natori, J. Knolle, and W. Brenig, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.09828 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    K. W. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, L. J. Sandilands, V. V. Shankar, Y. F. Hu, K. S. Burch, H.-Y. Kee, and Y.- J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    J. A. Sears, M. Songvilay, K. W. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, Y. Qiu, Y. Zhao, D. Parshall, and Y.-J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144420 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. A. Aczel, L. Li, M. B. Stone, G. E. Granroth, M. D. Lumsden, Y. Yiu, J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moess- ner, D. A. Tennant, M. D. G., and S. E. Nagler, Nat. Mater. 15, 733 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Banerjee, J

    A. Banerjee, J. Yan, J. Knolle, C. A. Bridges, M. B. Stone, M. D. Lumsden, D. G. Mandrus, D. A. Tennant, R. Moessner, and S. E. Nagler, Science 356, 1055 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Banerjee, P

    A. Banerjee, P. Lampen-Kelley, J. Knolle, C. Balz, A. A. Aczel, B. Winn, Y. Liu, D. Pajerowski, J. Yan, C. A. Bridges, et al., npj Quantum Materials 3, 8 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Little, L

    A. Little, L. Wu, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, S. Patankar, D. Rees, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, D. Man- drus, S. E. Nagler, and J. Orenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 227201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    L. J. Sandilands, Y. Tian, K. W. Plumb, Y.-J. Kim, and K. S. Burch, Physical review letters 114, 147201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    G. Li, X. Chen, Y. Gan, F. Li, M. Yan, F. Ye, S. Pei, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Su, et al. , Physical Review Ma- terials 3, 023601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Wulferding, Y

    D. Wulferding, Y. Choi, S.-H. Do, C. H. Lee, P. Lem- mens, C. Faugeras, Y. Gallais, and K.-Y. Choi, Nature communications 11, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Sahasrabudhe, D

    A. Sahasrabudhe, D. A. S. Kaib, S. Reschke, R. Ger- man, T. C. Koethe, J. Buhot, D. Kamenskyi, C. Hickey, P. Becker, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, S. H. Do, K. Y. Choi, M. Gr¨ uninger, S. M. Winter, Z. Wang, R. Valent´ ı, and P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, Phys. Rev. B 101, 140410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    D. Lin, K. Ran, H. Zheng, J. Xu, L. Gao, J. Wen, S.-L. Yu, J.-X. Li, and X. Xi, Physical Review B 101, 045419 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Y. Wang, G. B. Osterhoudt, Y. Tian, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, T. Goldstein, J. Yan, J. Knolle, H. Ji, R. J. Cava, et al., npj Quantum Materials 5, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006)

    A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Knolle, D

    J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Knolle, D

    J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115127 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    G. B. Hal´ asz, N. B. Perkins, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 127203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    G. B. Hal´ asz, S. Kourtis, J. Knolle, and N. B. Perkins, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184417 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Wan and N

    Y. Wan and N. P. Armitage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Metavitsiadis and W

    A. Metavitsiadis and W. Brenig, Physical Review B 101, 035103 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    M. Ye, R. M. Fernandes, and N. B. Perkins, Physical Review Research 2, 033180 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    K. Feng, M. Ye, and N. B. Perkins, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14661 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Kasahara, T

    Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, et al., Nature 559, 227 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    M. Ye, G. B. Hal´ asz, L. Savary, and L. Balents, Physical review letters 121, 147201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Vinkler-Aviv and A

    Y. Vinkler-Aviv and A. Rosch, Physical Review X 8, 031032 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Fano, Physical Review 124, 1866 (1961)

    U. Fano, Physical Review 124, 1866 (1961)

    work page 1961

  44. [44]

    Suzuki and H

    N. Suzuki and H. Kamimura, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 35, 985 (1973)

    work page 1973

  45. [45]

    Moriya, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 23, 490 (1967)

    T. Moriya, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 23, 490 (1967)

    work page 1967

  46. [46]

    Glamazda, P

    A. Glamazda, P. Lemmens, S.-H. Do, Y. Kwon, and K.-Y. Choi, Physical Review B 95, 174429 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Y.-Z. You, I. Kimchi, and A. Vishwanath, Physical Re- 6 view B 86, 085145 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    While we understand that the minimal model describing describing α-RuCl3 contains other terms [58], here we show that the main features of the observed phonon dy- namics can be understood already within the pure Kitaev model

    work page

  49. [49]

    The sixfold rotation C6 inC6v group corresponds to six- fold rotoreflection S6 in D3d, and S6 =C6vσh, where σh is a mirror reflection w.r.t the honeycomb plane [45]

    work page

  50. [50]

    Note that as our model is written in terms of the Pauli matrices, the coupling constant J here is 1/4 of the cou- pling for spin-1/2

    work page

  51. [51]

    Supplementary material

    work page

  52. [52]

    Guizzetti, E

    G. Guizzetti, E. Reguzzoni, and I. Pollini, Physics Let- ters A 70, 34 (1979)

    work page 1979

  53. [53]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer Science and Business Media, 2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    However, their main ef- fects mainly appear at energies below J, so they will not change much physics at the energy scale above J

    In a recent study [7], some of us showed that in the Ki- taev candidate materials non-LF terms also appear in the magnetic Raman scattering. However, their main ef- fects mainly appear at energies below J, so they will not change much physics at the energy scale above J. This is why here we constrain our consideration to the LF ap- proximation

    work page

  55. [55]

    K. Feng, N. B. Perkins, and F. J. Burnell, Physical Re- view B 102, 224402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Feng, Phonon and Thermal Dynamics of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids , Ph.D

    K. Feng, Phonon and Thermal Dynamics of Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids , Ph.D. thesis, University of Min- nesota (2022), see App. A.2 and B.2

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    D. A. Kaib, S. Biswas, K. Riedl, S. M. Winter, and R. Valent´ ı, Physical Review B103, L140402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Physical Review B 92, 115122 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Lahtinen, New Journal of Physics 13, 075009 (2011)

    V. Lahtinen, New Journal of Physics 13, 075009 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valenti, 29, 493002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    T. Inui, Y. Tanabe, and Y. Onodera, Group theory and its applications in physics , Vol. 78 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1996) Chap. 4.13.2, 6.2, pp. 78, 106– 107

    work page 1996

  62. [62]

    Equivalent to Schur’s Lemma in group representation theory

    work page

  63. [63]

    D. S. Dummit and R. M. Foote, Abstract algebra, Vol. 3 (Wiley Hoboken, 2004)

    work page 2004

  64. [64]

    Serre, Linear representations of finite groups , Vol

    J.-P. Serre, Linear representations of finite groups , Vol. 42 (Springer, 1977) Chap. 2.7, pp. 23–24

    work page 1977

  65. [65]

    The programming code for this computation is available upon request

    work page

  66. [66]

    The explicit result is shared by the author through pri- vate communication

    work page

  67. [67]

    Kroumova, M

    E. Kroumova, M. Aroyo, J. Perez-Mato, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, S. Ivantchev, and H. Wondratschek, Phase Transitions: A Multinational Journal 76, 155 (2003)

    work page 2003

  68. [68]

    Note that, here the coordinate system as illustrated in the figure has been rotated from the standard settings of space group

    work page

  69. [69]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-particle physics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    T. T. Mai, A. McCreary, P. Lampen-Kelley, N. Butch, J. R. Simpson, J.-Q. Yan, S. E. Nagler, D. Mandrus, A. H. Walker, and R. V. Aguilar, Physical Review B 100, 134419 (2019). 7 Supplementary Material A. The irreducible representations of the phonon modes In the main text, we have introduced the phonon Hamiltonian Hph. Its normal vibration modes will be so...

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    [64] with a goal to identify the two low-energy Eg modes among the four pairs of Eg modes identified by DFT. By looking at the major dominant vibrating components and their relative directions on each Ru 3+ and Cl− ions, we conclude that the low-energy modes E1 g and E2 g modes are those given by Eq. (A1) and Eq. (A2), respectively. Note that the E2 g mode...

    work page