pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.18740 · v1 · pith:7YUII43Hnew · submitted 2025-04-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

LBT IR observations of candidate super-Eddington quasars

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords highlinequasarsaccretingaccretionadditionchemicalfeedback
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Quasars accreting at very high rates are believed to be prime movers of galactic evolution because of their high radiative and mechanical output. The study presented in this paper investigates a sample of six highly accreting quasars at redshifts \( z = 2-3 \) using near-infrared observations from the LUCI spectrograph at the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). The aim is obtain a precise measure of the quasar systemic redshift and accretion parameters (black hole mass and Eddington ratio) primarily from the \hb\ line, \ and on second stance from other intermediate and low ionization lines. Outflow dynamical parameters (mass rate of outflowing gas, its kinetic power and momentum rate) were estimated from the \civ\ emission line that is perhaps the most easily accessible tracer of high-ionization winds from the accretion disk, obtained from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In addition, the joint analysis of the rest-frame optical and UV spectra allowed us to estimate the chemical composition of the broad line emitting gas. The high metal content of the outflowing gas ($Z \gtrsim 10 Z_\odot$) and the high values of thrust and kinetic power may induce a chemical feedback effect in the quasar host, in addition to mechanical feedback.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Preliminary cosmological results using extreme accretors Quasar formalism

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A compiled sample of xA quasars yields H0 = 69.8 ± 2.2 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1} alone and 69.0 ± 0.9 when combined with SNIa, chronometers and CMB priors, with weak Bayesian preference for wCDM and w0waCDM over ΛCDM.