Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 40 references

NGC 1261: A time-series \emph{VI} study of its variable stars

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using complete VI light curves of member RR Lyrae stars together with Gaia DR2 membership, this paper revises NGC 1261's metallicity to [Fe/H]ZW = -1.42 ± 0.05 and its distance to 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc, and finds its pulsation modes cleanly…

desk verdict Solid observational study of NGC 1261's variables, but the headline distance and metallicity are not consistently derivable from the paper's own tables; needs a careful revision before it is citable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04808 v1 pith:7Z4N3WDK submitted 2019-08-13 astro-ph.SR

A. Arellano Ferro , I.H. Bustos Fierro , J.H. Calderón , J.A. Ahumada This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords globularclustersNGC1261RRLyraestarsFourierdecompositionOosterhofftypeIGaiaDR2propermotionsdistancedeterminationhorizontalbranchmorphology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using 330 V-band and 412 I-band CCD images of the globular cluster NGC 1261, this paper tries to turn its RR Lyrae stars into distance and metallicity probes. By Fourier-decomposing the light curves and applying empirical calibrations for fundamental and first-overtone pulsators, the authors derive a cluster metallicity of [Fe/H]ZW = -1.42 ± 0.05 dex and a distance of 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc, both slightly more metal-poor and more distant than the catalog values in common use. The paper also argues that the RRab and RRc stars are cleanly separated around the first-overtone red edge, matching the red-horizontal-branch Oosterhoff type I pattern, and that no new variables are hiding in its data. A sympathetic reader would take this as a demonstration that complete VI light curves of RR Lyrae stars, combined with Gaia DR2 membership, can revise a cluster's fundamental parameters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is Fourier decomposition of the VI light curves: each RR Lyrae magnitude series is written as $m(t) = A_0 + \sum_k A_k \cos(2\pi k(t-E_0)/P + \phi_k)$, and the phase combinations $\phi_{21}$, $\phi_{31}$, $\phi_{41}$ and amplitude ratios $R_{ij}$ feed empirical calibration formulae — Jurcsik & Kovács (1996) and Kovács & Walker (2001) for RRab stars, Morgan et al. (2007) and Kovács & Kanbur (1998) for RRc stars — that return individual [Fe/H], $M_V$, radius and mass. Membership is vetted before the parameters are averaged: a hierarchical clustering over Gaia DR2 positions and proper motions separates cluster members from field stars, and Gaia photometry is used to correct the magnitudes and amplitudes of variables blended with close neighbours. The first-overtone red edge (FORE), the empirical boundary between RRc and RRab pulsation in the instability strip, is the diagnostic object for the mode-segregation claim.

What would settle it

Measure the iron abundance of a handful of NGC 1261 red giants spectroscopically; if the mean is near -1.27 rather than -1.42, the Fourier-calibration metallicity and the distance derived from it are biased. Similarly, a direct geometric distance for member stars from Gaia parallaxes or from a detached eclipsing binary in the cluster that lands near 16.4 kpc rather than 17.2 kpc would falsify the revised distance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the RR Lyrae population of NGC 1261, observed in V and I over seventeen nights, yields a cluster metallicity [Fe/H]ZW = -1.42 ± 0.05 dex and a distance d = 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc once Gaia DR2 proper motions are used to confirm membership and unresolved neighbouring stars are subtracted. It further claims that the fundamental (RRab) and first-overtone (RRc) pulsators are cleanly separated around the first-overtone red edge, as expected for an Oosterhoff type I cluster with a very red horizontal branch, and that a careful multi-method search found no previously unknown variable stars in the field.

Load-bearing premise

The empirical Fourier calibrations that turn light-curve shapes into [Fe/H] and absolute magnitude are assumed to apply to NGC 1261's RR Lyrae stars without a metallicity-dependent or period-dependent bias, and the paper checks them only against photometric estimates, not against an independent spectroscopic metallicity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NGC 1261's catalog entries for distance and metallicity should be revised from about 16.4 kpc and [Fe/H] = -1.27 to about 17.2 kpc and [Fe/H]ZW = -1.42 if these results hold.
  • The clean mode split around the FORE adds NGC 1261 to the small set of red-horizontal-branch Oo I clusters where RRc and RRab stars do not mix, supporting the link between horizontal-branch morphology and pulsation-mode distribution.
  • The I-band P-L relation distance (16.65 ± 0.27 kpc) and the Fourier distance (17.2 ± 0.4 kpc) agree within uncertainties, indicating the RR Lyrae-based distance ladder is internally consistent for this cluster.
  • The paper's reported individual masses and radii for member RR Lyrae stars can serve as test points for horizontal-branch evolution models at [Fe/H] ≈ -1.4.
  • The null result of the variable search sets a photometric limit on undiscovered variables in the 10×10 arcmin² field, so future discoveries in NGC 1261 will have to come from deeper or higher-resolution data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the revised distance of 17.2 kpc holds, the cluster's position in the Milky Way's inner halo shifts by roughly 0.8 kpc, which would affect any orbital or dynamical models built on the older catalog distance.
  • A spectroscopic metallicity of member red giants could decide between the RRab-based value (-1.42) and the RRc-based value (-1.51), revealing whether the two independent Fourier calibrations carry a small systematic offset.
  • The claimed link between red horizontal branches and clean mode segregation could be tested in the other unstudied red-HB Oo I clusters the paper lists, such as NGC 362; if any of them shows mixed modes, the connection would be cluster-specific rather than general.
  • The reported null search for new variables is only as deep as the CCD photometry; a space-based or longer-baseline search could plausibly turn up additional low-amplitude or crowded-core variables that this ground-based survey would miss.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new time-series VI CCD photometry of the globular cluster NGC 1261, obtained with the 1.54 m telescope at Bosque Alegre over 2017–2018. After a Gaia DR2 proper-motion membership analysis, the authors Fourier-decompose the light curves of member RR Lyrae stars and apply empirical calibrations to derive individual metallicities, absolute magnitudes, radii, and masses. They also use an I-band period-luminosity relation for RR Lyrae stars. The paper reports a mean metallicity [Fe/H]_ZW = -1.42 ± 0.05 dex and a distance d = 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc, identifies NGC 1261 as an Oosterhoff type I cluster with a clean separation of RRab and RRc stars around the first-overtone red edge, and reports that a multi-approach search found no new variable stars in the 10 × 10 arcmin^2 field.

Significance. If the quoted values are correct, the paper revises the cluster distance from the Harris (1996) value of about 16.4 kpc to about 17.2 kpc and its metallicity from about -1.27 to about -1.42 dex, a meaningful update for a cluster with no published spectroscopic metallicity. The paper's strengths include a substantial homogeneous time series, the use of a Gaia DR2 membership analysis, explicit corrections for blended light from unresolved Gaia sources, and a documented search for new variables. The mode-segregation discussion around the FORE is also a useful addition to the ongoing mapping of Oosterhoff properties. However, the headline quantitative claims are not internally consistent as written, and the reported uncertainties are internal fitting errors rather than total errors, so the central results are not yet auditable.

major comments (5)
  1. [§8, §10, Abstract] The central distance claim is not self-consistent. Section 8 reports Fourier RRab and RRc distances of 17.2 ± 0.4 and 17.6 ± 0.7 kpc, then states that the best RRab-only Fourier estimate is 17.2 ± 0.7 kpc, and then combines the RRab Fourier result with the I-band P-L result of 16.65 ± 0.27 kpc to quote an average of 16.7 kpc. The Abstract and §10 nevertheless state that the best distance is 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc. These numbers cannot all be the adopted best value, so the headline distance is not derivable from the tables and equations as written.
  2. [§7, §10, Table 6] The metallicity claim is internally inconsistent. Table 6 and §7 give the RRab weighted mean as [Fe/H]_ZW = -1.42 ± 0.05, while §10 states [Fe/H]_ZW = -1.45 ± 0.02 for the same RRab stars. These cannot both be the weighted mean of Table 6. The §10 value appears to be an erroneous or outdated average and must be reconciled with Table 6.
  3. [§6, Abstract] The Abstract presents [Fe/H] = -1.42 ± 0.05 dex and d = 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc without qualification, but §6 explicitly states that the quoted uncertainties are only internal errors from the Fourier fitting procedure and exclude systematic calibration errors. The Abstract should either quote the standard deviation of the mean values, which §6 identifies as a more reliable estimate of systematic errors, or explicitly state that the reported uncertainties are internal only.
  4. [Table 3, V2] Table 3 lists V2 as an RRab star with <V> = 16.780 and <I> = 12.285, which gives V−I = 4.495 and is unphysical for an RR Lyrae star, while the light curve in Fig. 3 is clearly not that extreme. This appears to be a typographical error, likely <I> = 16.285, but as printed it would corrupt the distance estimate for V2 and must be corrected.
  5. [§6, §7] The entire distance and metallicity derivation depends on empirical Fourier calibrations (Jurcsik & Kovács 1996; Kovács & Walker 2001; Morgan et al. 2007; Kovács & Kanbur 1998), and the paper notes that no spectroscopic metallicity for NGC 1261 has been published. A metallicity- or period-dependent bias in these calibrations would shift both [Fe/H] and M_V, and hence the distance, in a coherent way that the comparison with earlier photometric estimates cannot break. I recommend an explicit external consistency check, for example spectroscopy of two or three RRab stars or a comparison with Gaia DR2 parallaxes of the member RR Lyrae, to demonstrate that the revised cluster parameters are not calibration artefacts.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, §8] The Harris (1996) distance to NGC 1261 is quoted as 16.4 kpc in §1 and as 16.3 kpc in §8; please harmonize these values.
  2. [§6, §1] There are typographical errors, including 'respctively' in §6 and 'inestability' in §1, which should be corrected.
  3. [§5] The sentence 'the average of which, converted to E(V−I)/1.259 is 0.055 ± 0.051' is unclear; presumably the intended relation is E(B−V) = E(V−I)/1.259. Please rewrite for clarity.
  4. [§3.3] The description of the non-variable star C1 says it 'lies a bit above the red clump,' but the position is not quantified; please give the offset or a direct figure reference so readers can assess the non-variability claim.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'either-or or bimodal region' is not defined in the Abstract; please introduce the standard terminology in §1 or define it at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the quoted [Fe/H] and distance are outputs of external Fourier calibrations and P-L relations, not self-referential fits; self-citations such as the FORE line are peripheral to the headline numbers.

full rationale

I followed the derivation chain through §§6–10. The metallicity is obtained by applying the external empirical Fourier calibrations of Jurcsik & Kovács (1996), Kovács & Walker (2001), Morgan et al. (2007), and Kovács & Kanbur (1998) to the period and Fourier parameters of the RR Lyrae light curves; the equations are imported from Deras et al. (2019), which itself applies those same external calibrations, and NGC 1261 is not part of the calibration samples. The RRab distance of 17.2 ± 0.4 kpc follows from the calibrated M_V values plus the observed mean V magnitudes, and the I-band P-L check uses the independent Catelan et al. (2004) relation. Membership and reddening are established before the parameter estimates, using Gaia DR2 proper motions and the Sturch/Guldenschuh method, respectively. The FORE line used in the mode-segregation discussion is cited to Arellano Ferro et al. (2016), a self-citation, but it is an empirical boundary determined from other clusters and it does not enter the headline [Fe/H] or distance. I find no step where an output is defined in terms of itself, where a fitted parameter is relabelled a prediction, or where a uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The paper does contain internal inconsistencies in the quoted distance and RRab metallicity (17.2 ± 0.4 versus 17.2 ± 0.7 and 16.7 kpc; −1.42 ± 0.05 versus −1.45 ± 0.02), and it explicitly states that quoted uncertainties are internal Fourier-fit errors, but these are auditability and reproducibility defects, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters are fitted in this paper; the central values are derived by applying published empirical calibrations to the observed light curves. The external calibration coefficients and adopted reddening are the main unvalidated inputs, listed here as domain assumptions.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The empirical RRab calibration of Jurcsik & Kovács (1996) and Kovács & Walker (2001) maps Fourier parameters to [Fe/H] and M_V without bias.
    Invoked in §6 to convert Fourier decomposition of RRab light curves into physical parameters.
  • domain assumption The empirical RRc calibrations of Morgan et al. (2007) and Kovács & Kanbur (1998) are similarly valid.
    Invoked in §6 for RRc stars.
  • domain assumption The cluster reddening is E(B-V)=0.01.
    Adopted from Schlegel et al. (1998) and Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011); the paper's own E(V-I) estimate is 0.055±0.051, so this value is within uncertainties but assumed.
  • domain assumption The Catelan et al. (2004) I-band P-L relation with [alpha/Fe]=0.4 applies to this cluster.
    Used in §8 for the independent distance estimate.
  • domain assumption The Gaia DR2 membership method of Bustos Fierro & Calderón (2019) and the Gaia-to-VI colour transformations correctly identify members and contaminants.
    Used in §3.1 to assign membership and correct amplitudes.
  • domain assumption The Victoria-Regina isochrones and ZAHB models (VandenBerg et al. 2014) for [Fe/H]=-1.4, Y=0.25, [alpha/Fe]=0.4 describe the cluster CMD.
    Overplotted in Fig. 4 to verify age and distance; not used directly for the headline values but supports interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of NGC 1261: A time-series \emph{VI} study of its variable stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7Z4N3WDK

@misc{pith2026190804808,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: NGC 1261: A time-series \emphVI study of its variable stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7Z4N3WDK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04808}
}
abstract

Time-series \emph{VI} CCD photometry of the globular cluster NGC 1261 is employed to study its variable star population. A membership analysis of most variables based on Gaia~DR2 proper motions and colours, was performed prior to the estimation of the mean cluster distance and metallicity. For the member RR Lyrae, their light curves were Fourier decomposed to calculate their individual values of distance, [Fe/H], radius and mass. The $I$-band P-L for RR Lyrae stars was also employed. Our best estimates of the metallicity and distance of this Oo I cluster are [Fe/H]$_{\rm ZW}$=$-1.42 \pm 0.05$ dex and $d=17.2 \pm 0.4$ kpc. No mixture of fundamental and first overtone RR Lyrae stars in the either-or or bimodal region is seen in this cluster, as it seems to be the rule for Oo~I clusters with a red horizontal branch. A multi-approach search in a region of about 10$\times$10 arcmin$^2$ around the cluster revealed no new variable stars within the limitations of our CCD photometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04808 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Transformation relations obtained for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. rms of all light curves measured in our images as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. VI light curves of known RRab, RRc stars and the SX Phe V25 in NGC 1261. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Colour-magnitude diagram of NGC 1261. In the left panel, black and light blue symbols are used to distinguish [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expansion of the HB branch of NGC 1261. The left panel shows the HB region built from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Period-Amplitude diagram of NGC 1261. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Identification charts of all known variables in NGC 1261. The field of the left chart is 5.4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The HB structure parameter L as function of [Fe/H]. Circles and squares are used for inner and outer halo clusters respectively. The black-rimmed sym￾bols represent globular clusters where the fundamental and first overtone modes are well segregated around the FORE, as…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2011, MNRAS, 416, 2265 Arellano Ferro, A., Luna, A., Bramich, D

    Kuppuswamy, K. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2265 Arellano Ferro, A., Luna, A., Bramich, D. M., Giridhar, S., Ahumada, J. A., & Muneer, S. 2016, Ap&SS, 361, 175 Arellano Ferro, A., Mancera Piña, P. E., Bramich, D. M.,

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    A., Kains, N., & Kup- puswamy, K

    Giridhar, S., Ahumada, J. A., Kains, N., & Kup- puswamy, K. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 727 Arellano Ferro, A., Rojas Galindo, F. C., Muneer, S., &

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Bartolini, C., Grilli, F., & Robertson, J. W. 1971, Infor- mation Bulletin on Variable Stars, 594

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    Bono, G., Caputo, F., & Stellingwerf, R. F. 1994, ApJ, 423, 294

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Bramich, D. M. 2008, MNRAS, 386, L77

    2008

  6. [6]

    M., Bachelet, E., Alsubai, K

    Bramich, D. M., Bachelet, E., Alsubai, K. A., Mislis, D., & Parley, N. 2015, A&A, 577, A108 Bramich,D.M.,FigueraJaimes,R.,Giridhar,S.,&Arel- lano Ferro, A. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1275

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Bramich, D. M. & Freudling, W. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1584

    2012

  8. [8]

    R., & Girid- har, S

    Kains, N., Arellano Ferro, A., Figuera, J. R., & Girid- har, S. 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2275

    work page 2013

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    W., & Boy, W

    Burke, Edward W., J., Rolland, W. W., & Boy, W. R. 1970, Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 64, 353 Bustos Fierro, I. H. & Calderón, J. H. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3024

    1970

  2. [10]

    M., & Carney, B

    Cacciari, C., Corwin, T. M., & Carney, B. W. 2005, AJ, 129, 267

    2005

  3. [11]

    1978, A&A, 67, 107

    Caputo, F., Castellani, V., & Tornambe, A. 1978, A&A, 67, 107

    1978

  4. [12]

    2009, A&A, 508, 695

    Lucatello, S. 2009, A&A, 508, 695

    2009

  5. [13]

    J., & Smith, H

    Catelan, M., Pritzl, B. J., & Smith, H. A. 2004, ApJS, 154, 633

    2004

  6. [14]

    M., Muzzin, A., Dufton, Q., Ponnampalam, T., Wang, J., Burford, J., Richardson, A., Rosebery, T., Rowe, J., & Hogg, H

    Clement, C. M., Muzzin, A., Dufton, Q., Ponnampalam, T., Wang, J., Burford, J., Richardson, A., Rosebery, T., Rowe, J., & Hogg, H. S. 2001, AJ, 122, 2587

    2001

  7. [15]

    Clement, C. M. & Shelton, I. 1997, AJ, 113, 1711

    1997

  8. [16]

    Muraveva, T., Rimoldini, L., Guy, L. P., Jevardat de Fombelle, G., Nienartowicz, K., Marchal, O., Au- dard, M., Holl, B., Leccia, S., Marconi, M., Musella, I., Mowlavi, N., Lecoeur-Taibi, I., Eyer, L., De Rid- der, J., Regibo, S., Sarro, L. M., Szabados, L., Evans, D. W., & Ri...

    2019

  9. [17]

    Cohen, R. E. & Sarajedini, A. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 342

    2012

  10. [18]

    H., Calderón, J

    Deras, D., Arellano Ferro, A., Lázaro, C., Bustos Fierro, I. H., Calderón, J. H., Muneer, S., & Giridhar, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2791

    2019

  11. [19]

    Dworetsky, M. M. 1983, MNRAS, 203, 917

    1983

  12. [20]

    R., Clementini, G., Fusi-Pecci, F., Vitiello, E., & Buonanno, R

    Ferraro, F. R., Clementini, G., Fusi-Pecci, F., Vitiello, E., & Buonanno, R. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 273

    1993

  13. [21]

    Fourcade, C. R. & Laborde, J. R. 1966, Atlas y Catálogo de Estrellas Variables en Cúmulos globulares al sur de -29◦, Cordoba, Argentina Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., 16 ARELLANO FERRO ET AL

    1966

  14. [22]

    Jones, C. A. L., Biermann, M., Evans, D. W., Eyer, L., & et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1

    2018

  15. [23]

    2010, AJ, 140, 1830

    Sarajedini, A., & Woodley, K. 2010, AJ, 140, 1830

    2010

  16. [24]

    2005, PASP, 117, 721

    Young, A. 2005, PASP, 117, 721

    2005

  17. [25]

    Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487

    1996

  18. [26]

    & Kovács, G

    Jurcsik, J. & Kovács, G. 1996, A&A, 312, 111 Kovács, G. & Kanbur, S. M. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 834 Kovács, G. & Walker, A. R. 2001, A&A, 374, 264

    1996

  19. [27]

    L., Matsunaga, N., Salaris, M., Lee, J.-W., & Chaboyer, B

    Clem, J. L., Matsunaga, N., Salaris, M., Lee, J.-W., & Chaboyer, B. 2013, AJ, 146, 119

    2013

  20. [28]

    Laborde, J. R. & Fourcade, C. R. 1966, Mem. Soc. As- tron. Italiana, 37, 251

    1966

  21. [29]

    & Breger, M

    Lenz, P. & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Astero- seismology, 146, 53

    2005

  22. [30]

    M., Wahl, J

    Morgan, S. M., Wahl, J. N., & Wieckhorst, R. M. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1421

    2007

  23. [31]

    V., Greco, C., Ma- teo, M., Dell’Arciprete, L., Rizzi, L., Gullieuszik, M., & Maio, M

    Poretti, E., Clementini, G., Held, E. V., Greco, C., Ma- teo, M., Dell’Arciprete, L., Rizzi, L., Gullieuszik, M., & Maio, M. 2008, ApJ, 685, 947

    2008

  24. [32]

    1993, ApJ, 414, 580

    Salaris, M., Chieffi, A., & Straniero, O. 1993, ApJ, 414, 580

    1993

  25. [33]

    A., & Pritzl, B

    Salinas, R., Catelan, M., Smith, H. A., & Pritzl, B. J. 2007, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5744

    2007

  26. [34]

    B., & Simunovic, M

    Catelan, M., Peacock, M. B., & Simunovic, M. 2016, AJ, 152, 55 Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    2016

  27. [35]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525

    1998

  28. [36]

    Stetson, P. B. 2000, PASP, 112, 925

    2000

  29. [37]

    1966, ApJ, 143, 774

    Sturch, C. 1966, ApJ, 143, 774

    1966

  30. [38]

    A., Bergbusch, P

    VandenBerg, D. A., Bergbusch, P. A., Ferguson, J. W., & Edvardsson, B. 2014, ApJ, 794, 72

    2014

  31. [39]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 134

    Casagrande, L. 2013, ApJ, 775, 134

    2013

  32. [40]

    & West, M

    Zinn, R. & West, M. J. 1984, ApJS, 55, 45 A. Arellano Ferro (armando@astro.unam.mx): Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. I Bustos Fierro (ivanbf@oac.unc.edu.ar), J. H. Calderón (calderon@oac.unc.edu.ar), J. A. Ahumada (javier.ahumada@unc.e...

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.