REVIEW 1 cited by
The Shiny Scary Future of Automated Research Synthesis in HCI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automation and semi-automation through computational tools like LLMs are also making their way to deployment in research synthesis and secondary research, such as systematic reviews. In some steps of research synthesis, this has the opportunity to provide substantial benefits by saving time that previously was spent on repetitive tasks. The screening stages in particular may benefit from carefully vetted computational support. However, this position paper argues for additional caution when bringing in such tools to the analysis and synthesis phases, where human judgement and expertise should be paramount throughout the process.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Emphasizing Deliberation and Critical Thinking in an AI Hype World
An HCI researcher argues that resisting AI solutionism requires slow, deliberate use and critical thinking rather than outright bans.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.