pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23314 · v1 · pith:A5T7RSG2new · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Wedge-avoidance Fisher Forecasts for Primordial Non-Gaussianity from Dark-Ages 21-cm Power Spectrum and Bispectrum

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords 21-cm cosmologyprimordial non-Gaussianityforeground wedgeFisher forecastsdark agesinflationary featurespower spectrumbispectrum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Foreground wedge avoidance in 21-cm observations significantly weakens constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a Fisher forecast framework that directly incorporates the loss of Fourier modes caused by avoiding the foreground wedge when measuring the 21-cm power spectrum and bispectrum from the dark ages. This mode loss is propagated into the variances used to forecast constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity amplitudes in two inflation models that produce oscillatory features. The central finding is that the wedge effect removes many modes in both observables, producing substantially weaker bounds than forecasts that omit it. A sympathetic reader would care because it supplies a more realistic limit on what lunar arrays can extract about early-universe physics. The framework is presented as usable for any redshift where the wedge is severe.

Core claim

By building a wedge-aware Fisher framework and applying it to resonant and step inflation models, the authors demonstrate that wedge avoidance reduces available Fourier modes substantially in both the cylindrical 21-cm power spectrum and reduced bispectrum, resulting in much weaker constraints on PNG amplitudes for a lunar far-side array that includes thermal noise.

What carries the argument

The wedge-aware Fisher framework that propagates the removed modes from foreground wedge avoidance directly into the variances of the cylindrical 21-cm power spectrum and reduced bispectrum.

If this is right

  • Constraints on PNG amplitudes become significantly weaker in both resonant and step models once wedge avoidance is included.
  • The same mode-loss effect appears in forecasts for both the power spectrum and the bispectrum.
  • The method applies to 21-cm forecasts at any redshift where the foreground wedge is important, including the epoch of reionization.
  • Thermal noise from a lunar array is folded into the forecasts alongside the wedge effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Array designs for high-redshift 21-cm observations may need to prioritize baselines that stay outside the wedge to restore some lost constraining power.
  • The similar degradation in both observables suggests that adding the bispectrum does not automatically compensate for wedge losses.
  • Accurate foreground modeling becomes a limiting factor for any PNG search that relies on high-redshift 21-cm data.

Load-bearing premise

Foreground wedge avoidance can be accurately modeled by directly propagating the removed modes into the variances of the power spectrum and bispectrum without additional unaccounted systematics or modeling errors.

What would settle it

A measurement or simulation that shows the actual variance in the retained cylindrical modes differs substantially from the prediction obtained by simple removal of wedge modes would falsify the framework.

read the original abstract

The Dark Ages offer a uniquely clean window on primordial physics, making the redshifted 21-cm signal a promising probe of primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG). Forecasts for interferometric 21-cm measurements must account for foreground wedge avoidance, which removes a substantial fraction of Fourier modes, and this effect is especially severe at high redshifts. We develop a wedge-aware Fisher framework in which this mode loss is propagated directly into the variances of the cylindrical 21-cm power spectrum and reduced bispectrum. As a case study, we apply the method to forecast PNG constraints in two inflation models with different oscillatory features, a resonant model and a step model, for a lunar far-side array including thermal noise. Since these features affect both the power spectrum and the bispectrum, we apply wedge avoidance to both forecasts and compare their constraining power on PNG amplitudes in these oscillatory feature models. We find that wedge avoidance reduces available Fourier modes significantly in both observables, leading to much weaker constraints on PNG. This framework is broadly applicable to 21-cm power spectrum and bispectrum forecasts across redshifts and is particularly useful in regimes where foreground wedge effect is severe, such as the epoch of reionization and the higher-redshift Dark Ages.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a wedge-aware Fisher matrix framework for forecasting constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) amplitudes in resonant and step inflation models from the cylindrical 21-cm power spectrum and reduced bispectrum during the Dark Ages. Mode loss from foreground wedge avoidance is propagated directly into the variances of both observables for a lunar far-side array that includes thermal noise; the central result is that this mode removal substantially weakens PNG constraints relative to forecasts that ignore the wedge.

Significance. If the direct-propagation approximation holds, the work supplies a practical, broadly applicable tool for including realistic foreground effects in high-redshift 21-cm forecasts. It quantifies how wedge avoidance degrades both power-spectrum and bispectrum constraints on oscillatory PNG features, which is relevant for array design and survey strategy at z ≳ 30.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Fisher framework): the central claim that wedge avoidance produces 'much weaker constraints' rests on the assumption that excised modes can be propagated directly into the variances of the cylindrical PS and reduced BS without residual systematics, mode-coupling, or bispectrum triangle reconfiguration. No explicit validation or error budget for this approximation is described; if residuals are non-negligible the reported degradation factor is not robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the reduced bispectrum and the precise definition of the cylindrical power spectrum should be stated explicitly in the methods section to allow reproduction of the Fisher matrix.
  2. The abstract states that the framework is 'broadly applicable' but does not indicate whether the code or Fisher matrices will be made public; adding a reproducibility statement would strengthen the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (Fisher framework): the central claim that wedge avoidance produces 'much weaker constraints' rests on the assumption that excised modes can be propagated directly into the variances of the cylindrical PS and reduced BS without residual systematics, mode-coupling, or bispectrum triangle reconfiguration. No explicit validation or error budget for this approximation is described; if residuals are non-negligible the reported degradation factor is not robust.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this key aspect of our methodology. The manuscript explicitly adopts the approximation that excised modes are propagated directly into the variances of the cylindrical power spectrum and reduced bispectrum (as stated in the abstract and §3) in order to isolate the leading-order impact of wedge avoidance on the Fisher information for PNG amplitudes. This is presented as a practical forecasting tool rather than a full end-to-end simulation. We agree that the current text does not provide an explicit validation, quantitative error budget, or discussion of potential residuals, mode-coupling, or bispectrum triangle reconfiguration. In the revised manuscript we will expand §3 with a new subsection discussing the assumptions and limitations of the direct-propagation approximation, including references to analogous treatments in the 21-cm literature and a qualitative assessment of regimes where residuals could become non-negligible. This will make clear that the reported degradation factors are conditional on the stated approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward-model Fisher forecast is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a modeling framework that directly excises wedge-affected modes from the cylindrical power spectrum and reduced bispectrum variances before computing the Fisher matrix for PNG constraints. This is an explicit modeling choice rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are described in the abstract or reader's summary. The central result (weaker constraints after mode removal) follows from the chosen propagation of mode loss and is externally falsifiable against actual 21-cm data or more complete simulations. This qualifies as an honest non-finding under the guidelines.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; full details of parameters and assumptions unavailable. The central claim rests on standard cosmological assumptions about 21-cm signal and foregrounds plus the specific array model.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Foreground wedge avoidance removes a substantial fraction of Fourier modes at high redshifts.
    Explicitly stated as the key effect to be propagated into the Fisher matrix.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5768 in / 1238 out tokens · 33152 ms · 2026-06-26T07:28:29.111887+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

    J.M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]

  2. [2]

    Creminelli and M

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga,Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function, JCAP10(2004) 006 [astro-ph/0407059]

  3. [3]

    Byrnes and K.-Y

    C.T. Byrnes and K.-Y. Choi,Review of local non-Gaussianity from multi-field inflation,Adv. Astron.2010(2010) 724525 [1002.3110]. [4]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A9 [1905.05697]

  4. [4]

    Benetti,Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data,Phys

    M. Benetti,Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 087302 [1308.6406]

  5. [5]

    Hazra, A

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky,Primordial features and Planck polarization,JCAP09(2016) 009 [1605.02106]

  6. [6]

    Raffaelli, M

    A. Raffaelli, M. Ballardini and N. Barbieri,Signals from the early Universe: a comprehensive search for primordial features in Planck CMB datasets,2605.30236

  7. [7]

    Alvarez et al.,Testing Inflation with Large Scale Structure: Connecting Hopes with Reality, 1412.4671

    M. Alvarez et al.,Testing Inflation with Large Scale Structure: Connecting Hopes with Reality, 1412.4671. – 24 –

  8. [8]

    Chaussidon et al.,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples,JCAP06(2025) 029 [2411.17623]

    E. Chaussidon et al.,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with DESI 2024 LRG and QSO samples,JCAP06(2025) 029 [2411.17623]. [10]Euclidcollaboration,Euclid preparation: Expected constraints on initial conditions, 2507.15819

  9. [9]

    Pritchard and A

    J.R. Pritchard and A. Loeb,21-cm cosmology,Rept. Prog. Phys.75(2012) 086901 [1109.6012]

  10. [10]

    Lewis and A

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor,The 21cm angular-power spectrum from the dark ages,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 083005 [astro-ph/0702600]

  11. [11]

    Fl¨ oss, T

    T. Fl¨ oss, T. de Wild, P.D. Meerburg and L.V.E. Koopmans,The Dark Ages’ 21-cm trispectrum,JCAP06(2022) 020 [2201.08843]

  12. [12]

    Mondal and R

    R. Mondal and R. Barkana,Prospects for precision cosmology with the 21 cm signal from the dark ages,Nature Astron.7(2023) 1025 [2305.08593]

  13. [13]

    Vanetti, E

    E. Vanetti, E. Vanzan, N. Bellomo and A. Raccanelli,Testing the growth of cosmic structures during the Dark Ages,JCAP09(2025) 054 [2502.08562]

  14. [14]

    Smith and J.C

    W. Smith and J.C. Pober,Detecting the 21 cm Signal from the Cosmic Dark Ages,Astrophys. J.984(2025) 116 [2504.08965]

  15. [15]

    Loeb and M

    A. Loeb and M. Zaldarriaga,Measuring the small - scale power spectrum of cosmic density fluctuations through 21 cm tomography prior to the epoch of structure formation,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 211301 [astro-ph/0312134]

  16. [16]

    Y. Mao, M. Tegmark, M. McQuinn, M. Zaldarriaga and O. Zahn,How accurately can 21 cm tomography constrain cosmology?,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 023529 [0802.1710]

  17. [17]

    Silk,The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,Phil

    J. Silk,The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.379 (2021) 20190561 [2011.04671]

  18. [18]

    Pillepich, C

    A. Pillepich, C. Porciani and S. Matarrese,The bispectrum of redshifted 21-cm fluctuations from the dark ages,Astrophys. J.662(2007) 1 [astro-ph/0611126]

  19. [19]

    Camera, M.G

    S. Camera, M.G. Santos and R. Maartens,Probing primordial non-Gaussianity with SKA galaxy redshift surveys: a fully relativistic analysis,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.448(2015) 1035 [1409.8286]

  20. [20]

    Karagiannis, A

    D. Karagiannis, A. Slosar and M. Liguori,Forecasts on Primordial non-Gaussianity from 21 cm Intensity Mapping experiments,JCAP11(2020) 052 [1911.03964]

  21. [21]

    Chen et al.,Large-scale Array for Radio Astronomy on the Farside,Phil

    X. Chen et al.,Large-scale Array for Radio Astronomy on the Farside,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A382(2024) 20230094 [2403.16409]

  22. [22]

    Burns et al.,A Lunar Farside Low Radio Frequency Array for Dark Ages 21-cm Cosmology, 2103.08623

    J. Burns et al.,A Lunar Farside Low Radio Frequency Array for Dark Ages 21-cm Cosmology, 2103.08623

  23. [23]

    Polidan, J.O

    R.S. Polidan, J.O. Burns, A. Ignatiev, A. Hegedus, J. Pober, N. Mahesh et al.,FarView: An in-situ manufactured lunar far side radio array concept for 21-cm Dark Ages cosmology,Adv. Space Res.74(2024) 528 [2404.03840]

  24. [24]

    Burns et al.,The FarView Low Frequency Radio Array on the Moon’s Far Side: Science and Array Architecture,2601.16170

    J.O. Burns et al.,The FarView Low Frequency Radio Array on the Moon’s Far Side: Science and Array Architecture,2601.16170

  25. [25]

    Pober and W

    J.C. Pober and W. Smith,The impact of foregrounds on dark ages measurements with the highly redshifted 21 cm line,The Astrophysical Journal990(2025) 34

  26. [26]

    Y. Xu, J. Hamann and X. Chen,Precise measurements of inflationary features with 21 cm observations,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 123518 [1607.00817]

  27. [27]

    Furlanetto, S.P

    S. Furlanetto, S.P. Oh and F. Briggs,Cosmology at Low Frequencies: The 21 cm Transition and the High-Redshift Universe,Phys. Rept.433(2006) 181 [astro-ph/0608032]. – 25 –

  28. [28]

    Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, P.D

    Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, P.D. Meerburg and S. Yuan,New light on 21 cm intensity fluctuations from the dark ages,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083506 [1312.4948]

  29. [29]

    Mu˜ noz, Y

    J.B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud and M. Kamionkowski,Primordial non-gaussianity from the bispectrum of 21-cm fluctuations in the dark ages,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 083508 [1506.04152]

  30. [30]

    Matarrese and L

    S. Matarrese and L. Verde,The effect of primordial non-Gaussianity on halo bias,Astrophys. J. Lett.677(2008) L77 [0801.4826]

  31. [31]

    Karagiannis, A

    D. Karagiannis, A. Lazanu, M. Liguori, A. Raccanelli, N. Bartolo and L. Verde,Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and power spectrum from upcoming optical and radio surveys,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478(2018) 1341 [1801.09280]

  32. [32]

    doi:10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2 , author =

    S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt,Modern Cosmology, Academic Press (2020), 10.1016/C2017-0-01943-2

  33. [33]

    Scoccimarro and H.M.P

    R. Scoccimarro and H.M.P. Couchman,A fitting formula for the nonlinear evolution of the bispectrum,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.325(2001) 1312 [astro-ph/0009427]

  34. [34]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga and R. Scoccimarro,Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory,Phys. Rept.367(2002) 1 [astro-ph/0112551]

  35. [35]

    Desjacques and U

    V. Desjacques and U. Seljak,Primordial non-Gaussianity in the large scale structure of the Universe,Adv. Astron.2010(2010) 908640 [1006.4763]

  36. [36]

    Yankelevich and C

    V. Yankelevich and C. Porciani,Cosmological information in the redshift-space bispectrum, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.483(2019) 2078 [1807.07076]

  37. [37]

    McAllister, E

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal,Gravity waves and linear inflation from axion monodromy,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 046003

  38. [38]

    Flauger, L

    R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal and G. Xu,Oscillations in the cmb from axion monodromy inflation,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 009

  39. [39]

    Adams, B

    J. Adams, B. Cresswell and R. Easther,Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 123514

  40. [40]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP 06(2007) 023 [astro-ph/0611645]

  41. [41]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Generation and Characterization of Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP04(2008) 010 [0801.3295]

  42. [42]

    Adshead, C

    P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E.A. Lim,Non-gaussianity from step features in the inflationary potential,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023531

  43. [43]

    Morales, B

    M.F. Morales, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan and A. Beardsley,Four Fundamental Foreground Power Spectrum Shapes for 21 cm Cosmology Observations,Astrophys. J.752(2012) 137 [1202.3830]

  44. [44]

    Parsons, J.C

    A.R. Parsons, J.C. Pober, J.E. Aguirre, C.L. Carilli, D.C. Jacobs and D.F. Moore,A Per-Baseline, Delay-Spectrum Technique for Accessing the 21cm Cosmic Reionization Signature,Astrophys. J.756(2012) 165 [1204.4749]

  45. [45]

    Liu, A.R

    A. Liu, A.R. Parsons and C.M. Trott,Epoch of reionization window. II. Statistical methods for foreground wedge reduction,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023019 [1404.4372]

  46. [46]

    Bull, P.G

    P. Bull, P.G. Ferreira, P. Patel and M.G. Santos,Late-time cosmology with 21cm intensity mapping experiments,Astrophys. J.803(2015) 21 [1405.1452]

  47. [47]

    Chiang, A.M

    C.-T. Chiang, A.M. Cieplak, F. Schmidt and A. Slosar,Response approach to the squeezed-limit bispectrum: application to the correlation of quasar and Lyman-αforest power spectrum,JCAP 06(2017) 022 [1701.03375]. – 26 –

  48. [48]

    X. Chen, N. Padmanabhan and D.J. Eisenstein,Probing primordial non-Gaussianity by reconstructing the initial conditions,JCAP08(2025) 055 [2412.00968]

  49. [49]

    Sefusatti, M

    E. Sefusatti, M. Crocce, S. Pueblas and R. Scoccimarro,Cosmology and the Bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023522 [astro-ph/0604505]

  50. [50]

    P. Bull, C. Guandalin and C. Addis,Modes of the Dark Ages 21cm field accessible to a lunar radio interferometer,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A382(2024) 20230072 [2403.16955]

  51. [51]

    Gagnon-Hartman, Y

    S. Gagnon-Hartman, Y. Cui, A. Liu, S. Ravanbakhsh and J. Kennedy,Recovering the wedge modes lost to 21-cm foregrounds,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504(2021) 4716 [2102.08382]

  52. [52]

    Q. Li, X. Wang, X. Li, J. Ding, T. Luan and X. Luo,Restoring missing modes of 21cm intensity mapping with deep learning: impact on BAO reconstruction,JCAP04(2025) 082 [2412.04021]

  53. [53]

    Mergulh˜ ao, F

    T. Mergulh˜ ao, F. Beutler and J.A. Peacock,Primordial feature constraints from BOSS + eBOSS,JCAP08(2023) 012 [2303.13946]. [56]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

  54. [54]

    Diemer,Colossus: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]

    B. Diemer,Colossus: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]

  55. [55]

    Robitaille, E.J

    Astropy Collaboration, T.P. Robitaille, E.J. Tollerud, P. Greenfield, M. Droettboom, E. Bray et al.,Astropy: A community python package for astronomy,Astronomy & Astrophysics558 (2013) A33 [1307.6212]

  56. [56]

    Price-Whelan, B.M

    Astropy Collaboration, A.M. Price-Whelan, B.M. Sip˝ ocz, H.M. G¨ unther, P.L. Lim, S.M. Crawford et al.,The astropy project: Building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package,The Astronomical Journal156(2018) 123 [1801.02634]

  57. [57]

    Price-Whelan, P.L

    Astropy Collaboration, A.M. Price-Whelan, P.L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley et al., The astropy project: Sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the v5.0 core package,The Astrophysical Journal935(2022) 167 [2206.14220]

  58. [58]

    Harris, K.J

    C.R. Harris, K.J. Millman, S.J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau et al., Array programming with numpy,Nature585(2020) 357

  59. [59]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby,Efficient computation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies in closed friedmann–robertson–walker models,The Astrophysical Journal538 (2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177]

  60. [60]

    Gradshteyn and I.M

    I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press (Elsevier), Amsterdam, 7th ed. (2007). – 27 –