Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Flow-pattern switching in a Motored Spark Ignition Engine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.4287 v1 pith:A72BHCH4 submitted 2014-12-13 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords flowenginepatternintaketestcycle-to-cycleobservedother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cyclic-to-cycle variability, CCV, of intake-jet flow in an optical engine was measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV), revealing the possibility of two different flow patterns. A phase-dependent proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis showed that one or the other flow pattern would appear in the average flow, sampled from test to test or sub-sampled within a single test; each data set contained individual cycles showing one flow pattern or the other. Three-dimensional velocity data from a large-eddy simulation (LES) of the engine showed that the PIV plane was cutting through a region of high shear between the intake jet and another large flow structure. Rotating the measurement plane 10{\deg} revealed one or the other flow structure observed in the PIV measurements. Thus, it was hypothesized that cycle-to-cycle variations in the swirl ratio result in the two different flow patterns in the PIV plane. Having an unambiguous metric to reveal large-scale flow CCV, causes for this variability were examined within the possible sources present in the available testing. In particular, variations in intake-port and cylinder pressure, lateral valve oscillations, and engine RPM were examined as potential causes for the cycle-to-cycle flow ariations using the phase-dependent POD coefficients. No direct correlation was seen between the intake port pressure, or the pressure drop across the intake valve, and the in-cylinder flow pattern. A correlation was observed between dominant flow pattern and cycle-to-cycle variations in intake valve horizontal position. RPM values and in-cylinder flow patterns did not correlate directly. However, a shift in flow pattern was observed between early and late cycles in a 2900-cycle test after an approximately 5 rpm engine speed perturbation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools