Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Fast Alternating Radial Beamforming for Speed-of-Sound Imaging Based on Apparent Speckle Shifts

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Radial beamforming with fast pair alternation lets standard ultrasound scanners acquire speed-of-sound maps above 20 frames per second while matching Cartesian accuracy on breast lesions.

desk verdict Solid engineering paper that makes SoS imaging practical on ordinary line-based scanners; quality matches Cartesian software beamforming and the >20 fps claim is a clean timing calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06244 v1 pith:A76MAQXJ submitted 2026-07-07 eess.IV physics.med-ph

Dieter Schweizer , Can Deniz Bezek , Orcun Goksel This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVphysics.med-ph
keywords speed-of-soundimagingradialbeamformingvirtual-sourcetransmitspair-alternatingspeckletrackingreal-timeultrasoundbreastlesion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Standard ultrasound machines form images line-by-line with limited receive channels and cannot easily beamform full Cartesian frames for every transmit, so pulse-echo speed-of-sound imaging has stayed offline. This paper shows that the same machines can instead beamform on a radial grid whose origin sits between a pair of virtual-source transmits, then alternate those transmits line-by-line so that every tracking location is acquired only one pulse-echo cycle apart. The resulting displacement maps feed the same inverse problem used by earlier Cartesian methods and produce comparable speed-of-sound images on simulations, tissue-mimicking phantoms and in-vivo breast carcinomas. Because the sequence re-uses ordinary line-based hardware and can be interleaved with B-mode, dual-mode imaging becomes feasible at more than 20 frames per second. The practical consequence is that quantitative tissue-speed maps, previously confined to research scanners, can run on ordinary clinical systems without sacrificing contrast or accuracy.

What carries the argument

Fast pair-alternating radial beamforming (R9-grid with Rx origin placed between the two virtual-source foci, lines alternated every Tx–Rx cycle) supplies displacement estimates that are motion-robust down to a single pulse-echo interval and lie fully inside the transmit-overlap region, so the same L1-regularized inverse problem recovers the local speed-of-sound map.

What would settle it

Acquire the identical phantom or breast-lesion data on a conventional line-based scanner that implements the proposed radial sequence in hardware; if the reconstructed speed-of-sound contrast or RMSE systematically falls below the Cartesian software baseline reported here, the claim of parity fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Radial-grid beamforming of virtual-source transmit pairs, combined with fast pair-alternating acquisition of congruent beamforming lines, yields speed-of-sound reconstructions whose accuracy and lesion contrast match those of conventional Cartesian software beamforming, while remaining implementable on the line-based, limited-channel front-ends of ordinary ultrasound systems and supporting dual-mode frame rates above 20 fps.

Load-bearing premise

That the residual tissue motion occurring between two successive pulse-echo cycles is small enough not to corrupt clinical speed-of-sound reconstructions, and that a typical mid-range scanner can run the sequence without the offline data transfer still used in the present experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ordinary clinical ultrasound systems can display quantitative speed-of-sound maps interleaved with B-mode at real-time rates without hardware redesign.
  • Motion sensitivity of pulse-echo SoS imaging is reduced to the physical limit of a single pulse-echo cycle, improving robustness in freehand breast scanning.
  • The same radial geometry extends naturally to trapezoidal formats used by curved arrays and to pre-beamformed 2-D arrays for volumetric SoS imaging.
  • Because only tracked displacements (or a few tens of milliseconds of network inference) need leave the scanner, full RF transfer is no longer required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may lower the barrier for multi-center clinical studies of SoS as a breast-cancer biomarker, because data can be collected on the same machines already used for routine B-mode.
  • Pair-alternating radial acquisition could be reused for other differential-delay modalities (e.g., attenuation or shear-wave tracking) that currently rely on full-frame Cartesian beamforming.
  • If residual single-cycle motion still dominates error in highly mobile organs, the same sequence could be further accelerated by increasing the parallel-beamforming factor already assumed in the timing budget.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes radial (R-grid) beamforming with virtual-source transmits, together with fast pair-alternating beamforming (PAB), for pulse-echo speed-of-sound (SoS) imaging from apparent speckle shifts. The goal is compatibility with conventional line-based, on-the-fly beamformers of mid-range ultrasound systems. Two radial variants (R9-grid with virtual Rx origin behind the array and R0-grid with origin on the surface) are compared against conventional Cartesian-grid (C-grid) software beamforming. Evaluation uses k-Wave simulations of a circular inclusion, CIRS tissue-mimicking phantoms with positive and negative SoS contrast, and three biopsy-confirmed invasive ductal carcinomas. Metrics are RMSE against manufacturer ground truth (phantoms) and ΔSoS contrast (phantoms and in vivo). A sample timing calculation (Fig. 2) argues that the sequences support >20 fps SoS data acquisition interleaved with B-mode under modest parallel-beamforming assumptions.

Significance. If the engineering claim holds, the work is a concrete step toward clinical duplex SoS imaging on standard hardware rather than research-grade full-frame RF systems. Strengths include transparent arithmetic for the duplex timing budget (Section II-F / Fig. 2), explicit ablations of angular line density and addressable Rx channel count (Fig. 5), multi-domain validation (simulation, two-contrast phantoms, three in-vivo lesions), and open acknowledgment that reconstruction and buffer transport remain offline in the present experiments. The contribution is primarily systems-level feasibility rather than a new inverse-problem formulation; the L1-regularized reconstruction (Eq. 2) is taken from prior work. That is appropriate for the stated goal.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III-A / II-F / Fig. 2] Section III-A and the timing argument of Section II-F / Fig. 2: the experimental pipeline still incurs a 37.5 ms buffer-transport overhead to a PC for every Tx event and performs reconstruction offline. The >20 fps duplex claim is therefore an arithmetic extrapolation under stated parallel-beamforming and reconfiguration assumptions, not a closed-loop measurement. The paper correctly uses the language “would allow” and “step towards,” yet the abstract and conclusion should more explicitly separate demonstrated image-quality parity from the still-unrealized on-system real-time pipeline so that readers do not over-read the frame-rate claim.
  2. [Eq. (2) / Results] Equation (2) and all reconstruction figures: the regularization weight λ is never reported, nor is a selection or cross-validation procedure described. Because the same inverse problem is used for every grid comparison, an undocumented λ choice can affect absolute RMSE/ΔSoS values and the visual appearance of inclusions. For reproducibility and for fair comparison across C-/R-grids, λ (or the procedure used to set it) should be stated for each experiment series.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3] Figure 3 caption and color-bar note: the statement that color ranges were offset by ≈8 m/s to aid visual comparison of contrast should also appear in the main text or a methods subsection so that quantitative readers do not misinterpret absolute SoS levels.
  2. [Section II-C] Section II-C: the choice of the 9 mm virtual Rx origin depth for the R9-grid is stated as “without loss of generality” matching the Tx focal depth; a short sensitivity remark (or reference to the ablation in Fig. 5) would clarify whether this depth is critical.
  3. [Section IV-C / Fig. 6] In vivo evaluation uses only three lesions and reports ΔSoS without uncertainty or inter-observer variability on the radiologist masks. For a methods paper this is acceptable, but a sentence noting the limited sample size would temper any clinical-generalization reading.
  4. [Section II-A] Notation: σ vs. c and σ₀ vs. c₀ are introduced cleanly, yet the conversion between delay maps Δτ (ns) and the reconstructed SoS maps (m/s) is left implicit; a one-line reminder of the scaling would help readers moving between DMs and SoS images.
  5. [Throughout] Minor typography: “e.g.,” and “i.e.,” spacing is inconsistent; “R 9-grid” vs. “R9-grid” appears in both forms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: radial/PAB feasibility is an empirical engineering claim validated against external phantom GT and independent annotations, not a self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are comparative image quality (RMSE, ΔSoS) of R9/R0-grid vs C-grid beamforming plus a transparent arithmetic timing argument (Fig. 2 / Sec. II-F) under stated parallel-beamforming and reconfiguration assumptions. The inverse problem (Eqs. 1–2) and VS sequences are taken from prior literature (including author-overlapping citations [23], [27]), but both grids are processed identically with the same solver, so the parity result does not reduce to those citations by construction. Phantom ground-truth values are manufacturer-reported; in-vivo lesion masks are radiologist-annotated. No parameter is fitted then re-presented as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the radial choice, and no ansatz is smuggled. Residual single-cycle motion and offline PC transfer are acknowledged implementation limits, not hidden circular premises. Minor self-citation of the established SoS pipeline is normal and non-load-bearing for the new acquisition geometry; score 1 reflects only that residual self-reference.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard ultrasound physics (time-of-flight = path length × slowness), the previously published differential-path matrix L and L1-regularized reconstruction, plus the engineering premise that commercial on-the-fly beamformers can be programmed for radial lines and rapid Tx-pair switching. No new physical constants or free parameters are fitted to force the result; the free parameters that appear (λ, angular density, f-number) are conventional imaging choices whose influence is ablated.

free parameters (3)
  • regularization weight λ
    Controls edge-preserving regularization strength in the inverse problem (Eq. 2); value not reported but standard for the method family.
  • angular resolution r (beams per degree)
    Chosen as 2–4 beams/deg; ablated in Fig. 5 but still a free design parameter that affects both compute and image quality.
  • Rx f-number / aperture size
    Determines receive aperture width; fixed but not derived from first principles.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Apparent axial speckle shift Δd between two transmits equals (c0/2)·L(σ−σ0), i.e., the differential path matrix correctly maps local slowness deviations to observed delays.
    Taken from prior SoS literature (Eq. 1) and used without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Commercial line-based on-the-fly beamformers can be reconfigured to radial origins and can switch Tx parameters within ~10 µs.
    Stated as feasible for ‘standard hardware’ (Section II-E) but demonstrated only offline on a research-capable Fukuda system.
  • ad hoc to paper Motion between a single consecutive Tx–Rx cycle pair is negligible for clinical SoS accuracy.
    Core justification for pair-alternating beamforming; not quantified with measured tissue velocities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fast Alternating Radial Beamforming for Speed-of-Sound Imaging Based on Apparent Speckle Shifts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A76MAQXJ

@misc{pith2026260706244,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fast Alternating Radial Beamforming for Speed-of-Sound Imaging Based on Apparent Speckle Shifts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A76MAQXJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06244}
}
read the original abstract

Pulse-echo speed-of-sound (SoS) imaging based on minute misalignments between consecutively acquired ultrasound images traditionally relies on images beamformed on Cartesian grids. Existing SoS imaging developments do not allow for real-time imaging and typically do not prioritize feasibility in conventional ultrasound systems that have limited resources and rigid processing structures. In this work, we propose a resource-efficient approach based on radial beamforming with virtual source transmits for implementation within an on-the-fly beamformer. We also introduce alternating transmissions with fast pair-alternating beamforming for motion-robust displacement tracking with typical line-based beamformers. We tested these methods comparatively on numerical simulations, tissue-mimicking phantom experiments, and in vivo data from breast lesion examinations. We demonstrate that the proposed radial grid beamforming approach performs comparably to a Cartesian grid approach, while allowing implementation on standard hardware for beamforming. Our proposed sequences would allow for SoS data acquisition frame rates of more than 20 fps in parallel to conventional B-mode imaging. The proposed speckle-shift based radial approach with fast alternation between congruent beamforming lines is a major step towards real-time SoS imaging on standard ultrasound systems with moderate resources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06244 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Method of standard Cartesian-grid (C-grid) beamforming: A pair of VS transmits Tx [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Tx/Rx sequence of B-mode with interleaved SoS imaging using a 4-fold parallel beamformer. The sequence is based on a fast virtual-source sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) K-wave phantom, (b) B-mode images for a central Tx pair, (c) Displacement maps (DM), (d) Displacement tracking correlation map (CM), and (e) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DMs and SoS reconstructions for two phantom inclusions, with negative (left) and positive (right) SoS contrast. The beamforming method is Cartesian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial R9-grid SoS reconstruction of SoS tissue phantoms with radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SoS reconstruction for three breast lesions (ductal carcinomas) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: DMs for a ductal carcinoma shown in Figure 6 (right column) for different beamforming methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. S. C. Cobbold,F oundations of Biomedical Ultrasound. Oxford University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    US quantification of liver fat: Past, present, and future,

    D. T. Fetzer, T. T. Pierce, M. L. Robbin, G. Cloutier, A. Mufti, T. J. Hall, A. Chauhan, R. Kubale, and A. Tang, “US quantification of liver fat: Past, present, and future,”RadioGraphics, vol. 43, no. 7, p. e220178, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Speed of sound ultrasound: a pilot study on a novel technique to identify sarcopenia in seniors,

    S. J. Sanabria, K. Martini, G. Freyst ¨atter, L. Ruby, O. Goksel, T. Frauen- felder, and M. B. Rominger, “Speed of sound ultrasound: a pilot study on a novel technique to identify sarcopenia in seniors,”European Radiology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Breast density assessment via quantitative sound-speed measure- ment using conventional ultrasound transducers,

    C. D. Bezek, M. Farkas, D. Schweizer, R. A. Kubik-Huch, and O. Gok- sel, “Breast density assessment via quantitative sound-speed measure- ment using conventional ultrasound transducers,”European Radiology, vol. 35, pp. 1490–1501, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Pulse-echo imaging of breast speed-of-sound as a potential biomarker for breast cancer,

    D. Schweizer, M. Farkas, C. D. Bezek, C. Leo, R. A. Kubik-Huch, and O. Goksel, “Pulse-echo imaging of breast speed-of-sound as a potential biomarker for breast cancer,”Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1831–1839, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Estimation of the speed of ultrasound propagation in biological tissues: A beam-tracking method,

    J. Ophir, “Estimation of the speed of ultrasound propagation in biological tissues: A beam-tracking method,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 359–368, 1986. 8 Radial R9-gridCartesian C-grid Radial R0-grid 10mm -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 ns Fig. 7. DMs for a ductal carcinoma shown in Figure 6 (right co...

    work page 1986

  7. [7]

    The direct estimation of sound speed using pulse-echo ultrasound,

    M. E. Anderson and G. E. Trahey, “The direct estimation of sound speed using pulse-echo ultrasound,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 104, pp. 3099–3106, 1998

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Sound speed estimation using automatic ultrasound image registration,

    J. Krucker, J. B. Fowlkes, and P. L. Carson, “Sound speed estimation using automatic ultrasound image registration,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1095–1106, 2004

    work page 2004

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Sound speed correction in ultrasound imaging,

    D. Napolitano, C.-H. Chou, G. McLaughlin, T.-L. Ji, L. Mo, D. DeBuss- chere, and R. Steins, “Sound speed correction in ultrasound imaging,” Ultrasonics, vol. 44, pp. e43–e46, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    Estimation of average speed of sound using deconvolution of medical ultrasound data,

    H.-C. Shin, R. Prager, H. Gomersall, N. Kingsbury, G. Treece, and A. Gee, “Estimation of average speed of sound using deconvolution of medical ultrasound data,”Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 623–636, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Average sound speed estimation using speckle analysis of medical ultrasound data,

    X. Qu, T. Azuma, J. T. Liang, and Y . Nakajima, “Average sound speed estimation using speckle analysis of medical ultrasound data,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 891–899, 2012

    2012

  4. [12]

    In vitro estimation of mean sound speed based on minimum average phase variance in medical ultrasound imaging,

    C. Yoon, Y . Lee, J. H. Chang, T.-k. Song, and Y . Yoo, “In vitro estimation of mean sound speed based on minimum average phase variance in medical ultrasound imaging,”Ultrasonics, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 795–802, 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Mean sound speed estimation with focusing quality evaluation for medical ultrasound imaging,

    S. Park, J. Lee, W. Lee, and Y . Yoo, “Mean sound speed estimation with focusing quality evaluation for medical ultrasound imaging,” in2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2011, p. 2205–2208

    2011

  6. [14]

    Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals,

    H. Hasegawa and R. Nagaoka, “Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals,”Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, vol. 46, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Analytical estimation of beamforming speed-of-sound using transmission geometry,

    C. D. Bezek and O. Goksel, “Analytical estimation of beamforming speed-of-sound using transmission geometry,”Ultrasonics, vol. 134, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode for imaging speed of sound using pulse-echo sonography: Proof of principle,

    M. Jaeger, G. Held, S. Peeters, S. Preisser, M. Gr ¨unig, and M. Frenz, “Computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode for imaging speed of sound using pulse-echo sonography: Proof of principle,”Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 235–250, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assessment,

    M. Imbault, A. Faccinetto, B.-F. Osmanski, A. Tissier, T. Deffieux, J.-L. Gennisson, V . Vilgrain, and M. Tanter, “Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assessment,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 62, no. 9, p. 3582, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Spatial domain reconstruction for imaging speed-of-sound with pulse-echo ultrasound: simulation and in vivo study,

    S. J. Sanabria, E. Ozkan, M. Rominger, and O. Goksel, “Spatial domain reconstruction for imaging speed-of-sound with pulse-echo ultrasound: simulation and in vivo study,”Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 63, no. 21, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Local speed of sound estimation in tissue using pulse- echo ultrasound: Model-based approach,

    M. Jakovljevic, S. Hsieh, R. Ali, G. Chau Loo Kung, D. Hyun, and J. J. Dahl, “Local speed of sound estimation in tissue using pulse- echo ultrasound: Model-based approach,”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 254–266, 07 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Novel approach for ultrafast aberration correction and real-time speed-of-sound mapping,

    H. Bendjador, T. Deffieux, and M. Tanter, “Novel approach for ultrafast aberration correction and real-time speed-of-sound mapping,” inMedical Imaging 2021: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, B. C. Byram and N. V . Ruiter, Eds., vol. 11602, International Society for Optics and...

    2021

  13. [21]

    Refraction-based speed of sound estimation in layered media: An angular approach,

    B. H ´eriard-Dubreuil, A. Besson, F. Wintzenrieth, C. Cohen-Bacrie, and J.-P. Thiran, “Refraction-based speed of sound estimation in layered media: An angular approach,”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Fer- roelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 486–497, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Learning the imaging model of speed-of-sound reconstruction via a convolutional formula- tion,

    C. D. Bezek, M. Haas, R. Rau, and O. Goksel, “Learning the imaging model of speed-of-sound reconstruction via a convolutional formula- tion,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 3600– 3609, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Robust imaging of speed of sound using virtual source transmission,

    D. Schweizer, R. Rau, C. D. Bezek, R. A. Kubik-Huch, and O. Goksel, “Robust imaging of speed of sound using virtual source transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Con- trol, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1308–1318, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Image reconstruction via variational network for real-time hand-held sound-speed imaging,

    V . Vishnevskiy, S. J. Sanabria, and O. Goksel, “Image reconstruction via variational network for real-time hand-held sound-speed imaging,” inMICCAI Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Image Recon- struction, 2018, pp. 120–128

    2018

  17. [25]

    Deep variational networks with exponential weighting for learning computed tomography,

    V . Vishnevskiy, R. Rau, and O. Goksel, “Deep variational networks with exponential weighting for learning computed tomography,” inMICCAI, 2019, pp. 310–318

    2019

  18. [26]

    Improved forward model for quantitative pulse-echo speed-of-sound imaging,

    P. St ¨ahli, M. Kuriakose, M. Frenz, and M. Jaeger, “Improved forward model for quantitative pulse-echo speed-of-sound imaging,”Ultrasonics, vol. 108, p. 106168, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Speed-of-sound imaging using diverging waves,

    R. Rau, D. Schweizer, V . Vishnevskiy, and O. Goksel, “Speed-of-sound imaging using diverging waves,”International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 16, p. 1201–1211, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    So you think you can DAS? A viewpoint on delay-and-sum beamforming,

    V . Perrot, M. Polichetti, F. Varray, and D. Garcia, “So you think you can DAS? A viewpoint on delay-and-sum beamforming,”Ultrasonics, vol. 111, p. 106309, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields,

    B. E. Treeby and B. T. Cox, “k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields,”Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 021314, 2010

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.