Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Molecular laser cooling using serrodynes: Implementation, characterization and prospects

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Serrodyne modulation lets a single fiber-coupled laser deliver the optical spectrum needed to cool molecules, and concentrating power on the strongest transitions outperforms replicating the full spectrum.

desk verdict Serrodyne cooling is a real advance; the headline design rule is well-supported, but the force metric is simulation-calibrated and deserves one more experimental check. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10725 v1 pith:A7ED5Y3C submitted 2025-01-18 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gas

Felix Kogel , Tatsam Garg , Marian Rockenhäuser , Sebastián A. Morales-Ramírez , Tim Langen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords serrodynemolecularlasercoolingopticalcyclingbariummonofluoridehyperfinestructureSisyphuselectro-opticmodulatorsidebandoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Serrodyne modulation—driving an electro-optic modulator with sawtooth voltage ramps so the laser frequency steps through a sequence of values—offers a compact, fiber-integrated way to create the multiple optical frequencies needed to keep molecules cycling between laser-cooling transitions. The paper demonstrates this on barium monofluoride (BaF), whose resolved hyperfine structure normally demands several modulators; a single serrodyne waveform reproduces the required spectrum. The central result is a design rule: replicating the molecular spectrum exactly is not the best strategy. Measurements with three-sideband configurations show that concentrating most of the laser power on the few strongest transitions, while weakly repumping the rest, produces larger Sisyphus cooling forces than the four-component spectrum-matching configuration. If correct, this gives a practical route to laser cooling molecules with many nuclear spins, including species relevant to precision tests of fundamental symmetries.

What carries the argument

The central object is the serrodyne waveform: a periodic sawtooth phase ramp applied to an electro-optic modulator, in which each linear segment shifts the laser frequency by an amount proportional to the segment's slope, and the segment's duration sets the relative amplitude of that frequency component. By concatenating segments, nearly arbitrary time-sequenced optical spectra can be generated with a single fiber-coupled modulator. The argument is carried by a sideband-configuration comparison scored with the double-Gaussian peak-height ratio—the height of the cooled molecular peak divided by the uncooled background envelope—which simulations relate approximately linearly to the average cooling force. The optimization loop combines optical Bloch simulations of force profiles with experimental scans of detuning, power, interaction length, and serrodyne cycle time.

What would settle it

Measure the actual transverse velocity distribution of the molecular beam after cooling using a model-independent method, such as time-of-flight imaging or absorption velocimetry, for the Serro Cycling, Serro I, and Serro II configurations at their optimal detunings; if the velocity-based forces do not show Serro II exceeding Serro Cycling while the peak-height ratio does, the proxy assumption is invalid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in its conclusion, is that "fewer frequency components dedicated to addressing only the strongest transitions can lead to higher cooling efficiencies compared to exactly replicating the molecular spectra with the laser sidebands." It establishes this by comparing four sideband configurations on the quasi-closed $X^2\Sigma^+ \to A^2\Pi_{1/2}$ cycling transition of $^{138}$BaF: a conventional sinusoidal spectrum, a serrodyne spectrum matching all four hyperfine peaks, and two optimized three-sideband spectra (Serro I and Serro II). The best inferred cooling efficiency comes from Serro II, which puts 78% of the power into one component addressing the $J=3/2$ ground-state manifold and uses two weak components only to repump the $J=1/2$ manifold, avoiding the heating/cooling competition caused by an extra, oppositely detuned sideband. The paper also shows that serrodyne optical cycling is competitive with sinusoidal modulation at the powers studied, while the scattering rate keeps rising as the serrodyne cycle time is shortened, pointing to faster waveform generators as a clear improvement path.

Load-bearing premise

The ranking of sideband configurations rests on the assumption that the double-Gaussian peak-height ratio of cooled to uncooled molecules scales roughly linearly with the true cooling force; the authors note this follows from simulations and depends sensitively on alignment and implementation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For molecules with too many hyperfine transitions to address individually, the design rule becomes: identify the ground-state manifold with the highest multiplicity, put most laser power there, and weakly repump the remaining transitions to close the cycle.
  • Serrodyne spectra can be switched rapidly between configurations, making them suitable for blue-detuned magneto-optical traps and $\Lambda$-enhanced molasses that require quick spectral reconfiguration.
  • Because the optical cycling scattering rate was still increasing at the shortest serrodyne cycle times studied, faster arbitrary waveform generators should push scattering rates beyond what conventional sinusoidal modulation achieves.
  • The fiber-integrated serrodyne setup reduces optical power loss and setup complexity compared to banks of free-space modulators, which matters for experiments requiring many parallel cooling and repumping lasers.
  • The same three-sideband principle should transfer to other bosonic alkaline-earth monofluorides, where the $J=3/2$-type manifold dominates the Sisyphus forces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the peak-height proxy holds, the "strong transition plus weak repump" design rule should be testable in other species such as CaF or SrF, where the ratio of strongest to weakest hyperfine transitions differs; the prediction is that a Serro II-style spectrum will again beat a spectrum-matching comb.
  • The authors' observation that a single serrodyne component with weak higher-order comb lines nearly matches Serro II suggests that deliberately adding controlled weak sidebands could relax the bandwidth requirements of the waveform generator while keeping the force high.
  • Time-sequenced spectra open a possibility the paper does not pursue: synchronizing the serrodyne segment sequence with the molecular beam's arrival or with a pulsed source could address different velocity classes or isotopologues at different times using one laser.
  • For precision-measurement molecules like odd BaF isotopologues, a single serrodyne waveform could combine state preparation, cycling, and readout in one optical path, reducing the complexity of experiments searching for nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on the implementation and characterization of serrodyne-generated optical spectra for laser cooling of 138BaF molecules. It describes a fiber-based EOM setup for generating time-sequenced optical spectra, characterizes optical cycling as a function of laser power and serrodyne cycle time, and presents transverse Sisyphus laser-cooling measurements for several sideband configurations: conventional sinusoidal modulation, a serrodyne spectrum replicating the BaF hyperfine spectrum (Serro Cycling), a three-sideband optimized spectrum (Serro I), a three-sideband spectrum concentrating power on the J=3/2 manifold (Serro II), and a single serrodyne component (Serro Single). The central claim is that optimized spectra with fewer frequency components produce higher cooling efficiencies than exactly replicating the full molecular hyperfine spectrum, and that this design principle should transfer to other molecules with complex hyperfine structure.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper establishes a practical and useful design rule for molecular laser cooling: concentrate the available laser power on the strongest hyperfine transitions and only weakly repump the remaining states. The manuscript is experimental, internally consistent, and unusually transparent about its limitations, such as the higher losses of Serro II and the simulation-based nature of the force metric. It also provides useful technical characterizations, including the effects of amplifier bandwidth on higher-order serrodyne components and the verification that seeding a tapered amplifier with phase-modulated light does not introduce observable nonlinearities. The paper makes falsifiable predictions, for example that faster serrodyne switching should further improve cycling and that higher-bandwidth waveform generation reduces parasitic higher-order components.

major comments (2)
  1. [Transversal Sisyphus laser cooling, Fig. 5 caption and Table I] The cooling-efficiency metric used to rank all sideband configurations is the peak-height ratio of a double-Gaussian fit to the transverse beam profile, and the only justification for treating this ratio as a measure of the laser cooling force is the statement in the section 'Transversal Sisyphus laser cooling' that simulations suggest an approximately linear scaling. No independent experimental calibration of this mapping is provided. Because the Serro I and Serro II configurations were selected using the same optical-Bloch simulations (Ref. [8]) that motivate this scaling, the data establish consistency between simulation and a simulation-calibrated observable rather than independently verifying the design rule. The ratio can in principle also depend on the capture range, the final transverse temperature, and on losses that affect cooled and uncooled populations differently; the paper itself notes that Serro II suffers higher losses. Please add an experimental check of the metric, for example a deflection-based force measurement or a demonstration that the peak-height ratio responds monotonically to an experimentally varied force for a single configuration, or alternatively explicitly limit the central conclusion to the measured peak-height-ratio metric and state that the force interpretation and the transfer to other species rest on simulation.
  2. [Conclusion; Table I and Fig. 5] The headline comparison does not isolate the number of sidebands as the causal variable. The configurations compared in Table I differ simultaneously in the number of frequency components, their frequencies, their relative amplitudes, and in the detuning procedure, and the Serro I and Serro II configurations are simulation-optimized. The observation that Serro II outperforms Serro Cycling is consistent with the stated mechanism of reduced competition and concentrated power, but it does not by itself prove that 'fewer frequency components' is the operative factor. A controlled comparison, for example a fixed spectrum with one component removed or with its amplitude reallocated without any re-optimization, would substantially strengthen the claim. In the absence of such a test, the conclusion in the final section that 'our measurements verify that fewer frequency components dedicated to addressing only the strongest transitions can lead to higher cooling efficiencies' is stronger than the data support and should be rephrased to describe what was actually measured, namely that simulation-optimized spectra concentrating power on the strongest transitions achieve higher measured peak-height-ratio cooling efficiencies in this setup.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption and Table I] The Fig. 5 caption states that 'Serro II demonstrates the best performance overall but results in slightly higher losses with the current laser arrangement, which causes it to be outperformed by Serro Single in (a)', while Table I reports Serro II as having the largest maximum peak-height ratio (0.65 versus 0.61 for Serro Single). Please clarify whether 'outperformed' refers to the absolute signal height or to the peak-height ratio, and make the two statements consistent.
  2. [Table I] The table lists maximum peak-height ratios for each sideband configuration without uncertainties. Please add error bars or explicitly state that these values are extracted from the fits shown in Fig. 5 and indicate where the corresponding statistical uncertainties are presented.
  3. [Optical cycling, Fig. 3b] The sentence stating that 'saturation' will be approached 'only when these two timescales are comparable' should specify which two timescales are meant, namely the serrodyne cycle time and the inverse of the maximum scattering rate, R_max = 1/224 ns, to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Conclusion] The phrase 'fewer frequency components dedicated to addressing only the strongest transitions can lead to higher cooling efficiencies' should be qualified as applying to the optimized, simulation-selected configurations studied here; the data do not address arbitrary spectra with fewer components.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the measured cooling efficiencies are independent data; simulation-based configuration choices and the peak-height-ratio proxy are stated assumptions, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by direct measurements of optical cycling depletion and transverse beam-profile peak-height ratios, not by quantities that were fitted into the model and then read back out. The only simulation dependence appears in two places: the selection of Serro I and Serro II sideband configurations using optical Bloch simulations (Refs. [5,8] and Fig. 6), and the interpretation of the double-Gaussian peak-height ratio as an approximate proxy for cooling force ('Simulations suggest that this peak height ratio scales approximately linearly with the average force applied to the molecular beam in our setup, although the exact details will depend sensitively on the specific experimental implementation and alignment'). Neither step injects the measured peak-height ratios into the simulation as adjustable parameters, so the ranking of configurations is measured rather than forced by construction. The theoretical expectation that fewer, carefully tuned sidebands can improve forces is also attributed to external work (Refs. [17-19]), not solely to self-citations. The paper explicitly acknowledges the proxy's sensitivity, which is an honest limitation rather than a hidden identity between input and output. No equation defines a predicted quantity in terms of the measured quantity, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to prior work [5,8] provide context and simulation inputs, but the experimental verification in this paper is independent data. Therefore, under the stated rules, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central claim rests on one standard phase-modulation identity and on several domain assumptions about how time-sequenced spectra, fitted peak ratios, and optical Bloch simulations represent molecular cooling. The sideband configurations themselves are free parameters tuned to maximize force, so the paper demonstrates an optimization procedure rather than a parameter-free prediction.

free parameters (2)
  • Sideband frequencies and amplitudes for optimized configurations (Serro I, Serro II, Serro Single) = Serro I: 89, 68, -48 MHz with amplitudes 43%, 9%, 47%; Serro II: 74, 53, -52 MHz with amplitudes 18%, 4%, 78%
    Chosen by optical Bloch simulation optimization and hand tuning to maximize cooling force; the central ranking claim depends on these choices.
  • Laser detunings for each sideband configuration = Optimal detuning per configuration, e.g. Serro II scanned in detuning Delta_2
    Each configuration is scanned and evaluated at its own optimum detuning, which is standard practice but means the comparison is between individually optimized cases, not fixed parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math A linear phase ramp on an EOM shifts the laser frequency by the ramp slope, and a periodic sawtooth of ramps produces a time-sequenced set of frequencies.
    Basic phase-modulation identity E(t)=E0 exp(i(omega0+alpha)t) used in the Serrodynes section; standard Fourier and phase-optics background.
  • domain assumption Molecules respond to time-sequenced frequency components almost as if the sidebands were present simultaneously, provided the switching is fast compared to relevant timescales.
    Central to comparing serrodyne and sinusoidal performance; tested indirectly through cycle-time scans in Figs. 3b and 7c, but not exact.
  • domain assumption The double-Gaussian peak-height ratio of the molecular beam image scales approximately linearly with the average cooling force.
    Stated in the Fig. 5 caption as suggested by simulations and sensitive to alignment; used to rank sideband configurations.
  • domain assumption Optical Bloch equation simulations with BaF molecular parameters from the prior literature capture the relevant hyperfine transitions and loss channels well enough to select optimal sideband configurations.
    Used to design Serro I and Serro II in Fig. 6; the simulations are the authors' own [5,8], and the experiment confirms but does not independently validate all model inputs.
  • domain assumption The tapered amplifier does not introduce nonlinear distortions when seeded with phase-modulated light.
    Checked experimentally in Appendix Fig. 8, but only for the tested conditions; the power budget and sideband amplitudes assume this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Molecular laser cooling using serrodynes: Implementation, characterization and prospects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A7ED5Y3C

@misc{pith2026250110725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Molecular laser cooling using serrodynes: Implementation, characterization and prospects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A7ED5Y3C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10725}
}
read the original abstract

An important effort is currently underway to extend optical cycling and laser cooling to more molecular species. Significant challenges arise in particular when multiple nuclear spins give rise to complex, resolved hyperfine spectra, as is the case for several molecular species relevant to precision tests of fundamental symmetries. We provide a detailed introduction to the use of optical spectra generated via serrodyne waveforms to address this complexity. We discuss our experimental implementation of these serrodynes, characterize their properties, and outline procedures to find optimized sideband configurations that generate strong laser cooling forces. We demonstrate the application of these techniques to barium monofluoride molecules and explore their prospects for the cooling of other species relevant to the study of fundamental physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10725 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Example of a serrodyne waveform that is im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental setup for optical cycling and laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Optical cycling characterized using depletion of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sustained optical cycling characterized using deple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Characterization of laser cooling for different sideband configurations of the cooling laser. (a) Integrated line profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation and optimization of Sisyphus-type cool [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Laser cooling efficiency, as characterized by the peak height ratio. The dots are experimental data while the shaded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the optical spectra before (solid line) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Comparison of optical spectra (Serro Cycling) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Kogel, M

    F. Kogel, M. Rockenh¨ auser, R. Albrecht, and T. Langen, A laser cooling scheme for precision measurements using fermionic barium monofluoride (137Ba19F) molecules, New Journal of Physics 23, 095003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    Fitch and M

    N. Fitch and M. Tarbutt, Laser-cooled molecules, Ad- vances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 70, 157 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nature Physics 20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    M. D. Di Rosa, Laser-cooling molecules, The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics 31, 395 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [4]

    B. K. Stuhl, B. C. Sawyer, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Magneto- optical trap for polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 243002 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Rockenh¨ auser, F

    M. Rockenh¨ auser, F. Kogel, T. Garg, S. A. Morales- Ram ´ ırez, and T. Langen, Laser cooling of barium monofluoride molecules using synthesized optical spec- tra, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043161 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [6]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Λ-enhanced imaging of molecules in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 083201 (2018)

    2018

  8. [7]

    Truppe, H

    S. Truppe, H. J. Williams, M. Hambach, L. Caldwell, N. J. Fitch, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Molecules cooled below the Doppler limit, Nature Physics 13, 1173 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    DeMille, S

    D. DeMille, S. B. Cahn, D. Murphree, D. A. Rahmlow, and M. G. Kozlov, Using Molecules to Measure Nuclear Spin-Dependent Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 23003 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    V. V. Flambaum, D. DeMille, and M. G. Kozlov, Time- reversal symmetry violation in molecules induced by nu- clear magnetic quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103003 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    S. M. Udrescu, A. J. Brinson, R. F. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bis- sell, A. A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, K. T. Flanagan, T. F. Giesen, R. P. de Groote, S. Franchoo, F. P. Gustafsson, T. A. Isaev, A. Koszor´ us...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Grasdijk, O

    O. Grasdijk, O. Timgren, J. Kastelic, T. Wright, S. Lam- oreaux, D. DeMille, K. Wenz, M. Aitken, T. Zelevinsky, T. Winick, and D. Kawall, Centrex: a new search for time-reversal symmetry violation in the 205Tl nucleus, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 044007 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Y. Zeng, A. Jadbabaie, A. N. Patel, P. Yu, T. C. Steimle, and N. R. Hutzler, Optical cycling in polyatomic molecules with complex hyperfine structure, Phys. Rev. A 108, 012813 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Arrowsmith-Kron, M

    G. Arrowsmith-Kron, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M. Au, J. Ballof, R. Berger, A. Borschevsky, A. A. Breier, F. Buchinger, D. Budker, L. Caldwell, C. Charles, N. Dattani, R. P. de Groote, D. DeMille, T. Dickel, J. Dobaczewski, C. E. D¨ ullmann, E. Eliav, J. Engel, M. Fan, V. Fl...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Physikalisches Institut and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology, Universit¨ at Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 2Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, Stadionallee 2, A-1020 Vienna, Austria An important...

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gaul and R

    K. Gaul and R. Berger, Global analysis of CP-violation in atoms, molecules and role of medium-heavy systems, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024, 100 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Rockenh¨ auser, F

    M. Rockenh¨ auser, F. Kogel, E. Pultinevicius, and T. Lan- gen, Absorption spectroscopy for laser cooling and high- fidelity detection of barium monofluoride molecules, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062812 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. R. Tarbutt, Magneto-optical trapping forces for atoms and molecules with complex level structures, New Jour- nal of Physics 17, 015007 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    J. A. Devlin and M. R. Tarbutt, Laser cooling and magneto-optical trapping of molecules analyzed using optical Bloch equations and the Fokker-Planck-Kramers equation, Phys. Rev. A 98, 063415 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Alauze, J

    X. Alauze, J. Lim, M. A. Trigatzis, S. Swarbrick, F. J. Collings, N. J. Fitch, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, An ultracold molecular beam for testing fundamental physics, Quantum Science and Technology 6, 044005 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    M. Yeo, M. T. Hummon, A. L. Collopy, B. Yan, B. Hem- merling, E. Chae, J. M. Doyle, and J. Ye, Rotational state microwave mixing for laser cooling of complex diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 223003 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of pho- tonics: Part 1: Optics; 3rd edition , Wiley series in pure and applied optics (Wiley, Hoboken, 2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    R. C. Cumming, The serrodyne frequency translator, Proceedings of the IRE 45, 175 (1957)

    1957

  16. [24]

    D. M. S. Johnson, J. M. Hogan, S. w. Chiow, and M. A. Kasevich, Broadband optical serrodyne frequency shift- ing, Opt. Lett. 35, 745 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Balla, H

    P. Balla, H. T¨ unnermann, S. H. Salman, M. Fan, S. Al- isauskas, I. Hartl, and C. M. Heyl, Ultrafast serrodyne optical frequency translator, Nature Photonics 17, 187 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    C. E. Rogers, J. L. Carini, J. A. Pechkis, and P. L. Gould, Creation of arbitrary time-sequenced line spectra with an electro-optic phase modulator, Review of Scientific In- struments 82, 073107 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Synthesizing op- tical spectra using computer-generated holography tech- niques, New Journal of Physics 23, 033028 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Houtz, C

    R. Houtz, C. Chan, and H. M¨ uller, Wideband, efficient optical serrodyne frequency shifting with a phase modu- lator and a nonlinear transmission line, Opt. Express 17, 19235 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Lauermann, C

    M. Lauermann, C. Weimann, A. Knopf, W. Heni, R. Palmer, S. Koeber, D. L. Elder, W. Bogaerts, J. Leuthold, L. R. Dalton, C. Rembe, W. Freude, and C. Koos, Integrated optical frequency shifter in silicon- organic hybrid (soh) technology, Optics Express 24, 11694 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Aggarwal, H

    P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, P. A. B. Haase, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, K. Jung- mann, T. B. Meijknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmer- 10 mans, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, and A. Zapara, Measur- ing the electric dipole moment of the electron in BaF, E...

    2018

  23. [31]

    Altuntas, J

    E. Altuntas, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. De- Mille, Demonstration of a Sensitive Method to Measure Nuclear-Spin-Dependent Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 142501 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    A. C. Vutha, M. Horbatsch, and E. A. Hessels, Orientation-dependent hyperfine structure of polar molecules in a rare-gas matrix: A scheme for measur- ing the electron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032513 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Kogel, T

    F. Kogel, T. Garg, M. Rockenh¨ auser, S. Morales- Ramirez, and T. Langen, Isotopologue-selective laser cooling of molecules, New Journal of Physics (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Denis, P

    M. Denis, P. A. B. Haase, M. C. Mooij, Y. Chamorro, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Boeschoten, A. Borschevsky, K. Esajas, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, J. W. F. van Hofslot, V. R. Marshall, T. B. Mei- jknecht, R. G. E. Timmermans, A. Touwen, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, and Y. Yin (NL- eEDM...

    2022

  27. [35]

    W. Bu, Y. Zhang, Q. Liang, T. Chen, and B. Yan, Saturated absorption spectroscopy of buffer-gas-cooled barium monofluoride molecules, Frontiers of Physics 17, 62502 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Z. Zeng, S. Deng, S. Yang, and B. Yan, Three- dimensional magneto-optical trapping of barium monofluoride, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 143404 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Albrecht, M

    R. Albrecht, M. Scharwaechter, T. Sixt, L. Hofer, and T. Langen, Buffer-gas cooling, high-resolution spec- troscopy, and optical cycling of barium monofluoride molecules, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013413 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Aggarwal, V

    P. Aggarwal, V. R. Marshall, H. L. Bethlem, A. Boeschoten, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esa- jas, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann, T. B. Mei- jknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmermans, A. Touwen, W. Ubachs, S. M. Vermeulen, L. Willmann, Y. Yin, and A. Zapara (NL-eEDM Collabor...

    2019

  31. [39]

    J. C. Shaw, J. C. Schnaubelt, and D. J. McCarron, Reso- nance raman optical cycling for high-fidelity fluorescence detection of molecules, Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042041 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Y. Hao, L. F. Paˇ steka, L. Visscher, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Boeschoten, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann, V. R. Marshall, T. B. Meijknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmermans, A. Touwen, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, Y. Yin, and A. Za- para, High ...

    2019

  33. [41]

    M. Fan, C. A. Holliman, A. L. Wang, and A. M. Jayich, Laser cooling of radium ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 223001 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    N¨ otzold, R

    M. N¨ otzold, R. Wild, C. Lochmann, and R. Wester, Spec- troscopy and ion thermometry of C2 − using laser-cooling transitions, Phys. Rev. A 106, 023111 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Huang, C

    C. Huang, C. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Hu, Z. Wang, Z. Mao, S. Li, P. Hou, Y. Wu, Z. Zhou, and L. Duan, Electromag- netically induced transparency cooling of high-nuclear- spin ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 113204 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Altunta¸ s, J

    E. Altunta¸ s, J. Ammon, S. B. Cahn, and D. DeMille, Measuring nuclear-spin-dependent parity violation with molecules: Experimental methods and analysis of sys- tematic errors, Phys. Rev. A 97, 042101 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Lasner and D

    Z. Lasner and D. DeMille, Statistical sensitivity of phase measurements via laser-induced fluorescence with optical cycling detection, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053823 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    J. J. Burau, P. Aggarwal, K. Mehling, and J. Ye, Blue- detuned magneto-optical trap of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 193401 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Blue- detuned magneto-optical trap of CaFmolecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 233402 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    J. C. Zappala, K. Bailey, Z.-T. Lu, T. P. O’Connor, and W. Jiang, Note: Efficient generation of optical sidebands at GHz with a high-power tapered amplifier, Review of Scientific Instruments 85, 046104 (2014). APPENDIX Modulated injection into a tapered amplifier The flexibili...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.