Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Wideband Glide-Symmetric Slow-Wave Structure for Millimeter-Wave Sheet Beam TWTs

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A glide-symmetric staggered-pillar structure gives a V-band sheet-beam TWT a 13.1 GHz gain bandwidth.

desk verdict New staggered-pillar glide-symmetric SWS for V-band sheet-beam TWTs shows 22% simulated gain bandwidth at 5.2 kV; solid design study, but the practical claims rest on unquantified symmetry tolerances and uniform-solenoid beam confinement. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22927 v1 pith:A7EFG47B submitted 2025-05-28 physics.plasm-ph

Robert Marosi , Muhammed Zuboraj , Filippo Capolino This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords traveling-wavetubeslow-wavestructureglidesymmetrysheetelectronbeammillimeter-waveamplifierV-bandfieldemitterarraybackward-waveoscillation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a slow-wave structure for a millimeter-wave sheet-beam traveling-wave tube (TWT) that is deliberately built with glide symmetry, so its pillar pattern repeats after a half-period shift plus a mirror flip. The claim is that this symmetry lets the structure sustain beam–wave synchronism over a wide band: a 5.2 kV, 11 mA sheet beam is synchronized to the forward wave across 55–68 GHz, giving a 3-dB gain bandwidth of 13.1 GHz (22% relative bandwidth) and 19 dB peak gain in particle-in-cell simulation. The same symmetry cancels the on-axis interaction impedance of the backward wave, which suppresses the backward-wave oscillation risk that usually limits wideband TWT designs. The paper reports 741 mW saturated output power at 62 GHz with about 1.2% DC-to-RF efficiency, and argues that the low beam voltage makes the design compatible with a diamond field-emitter-array cathode.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the glide-symmetric staggered pillar unit cell: rectangular metal pillars of length $d/4$ protrude from opposite narrow walls of a rectangular waveguide, staggered by half the period $d$ along the axis, making the cell invariant under a combined mirror reflection and half-period translation. Glide symmetry is what lets the dispersion curves of adjacent spatial harmonics cross at $\beta_n d = 3\pi$ without forming a stopband, and it forces the longitudinal field component $E_z$ of the backward even mode to vanish on axis for the harmonics used, so the backward-wave interaction impedance computed from $Z_P = |E_{z,n}|^2/(2\beta_n^2 P)$ is effectively zero. The forward even mode, excited by a coupler designed to be symmetric, carries the interaction with the beam. The design operates between the first and second Floquet harmonics, with synchronization chosen above the $3\pi$ point to offset the smaller interaction impedance at high frequencies.

What would settle it

A cold test of a fabricated 60-cell staggered-pillar structure would settle it: if a stopband appears near the $3\pi$ point (about 61 GHz) or the 55–68 GHz passband narrows, the glide-symmetry bandwidth claim fails; a hot test using a periodic magnetic focusing system instead of the uniform solenoid that shows beam interception or gain ripple would test the confinement assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a staggered-pillar rectangular waveguide, whose pillars protrude alternately from opposite narrow walls with a half-period stagger, is a glide-symmetric slow-wave structure whose dispersion has no stopband at the $3\pi$ point: the forward and backward Floquet harmonics cross there instead of opening a bandgap. Because of this property, the backward even mode has a vanishing on-axis longitudinal electric field over the space-harmonic interval of interest, so its on-axis interaction impedance is effectively $0\Omega$, while the forward even mode keeps a strong, beam-uniform interaction impedance of 1.3–3.8 $\Omega$ across the operating band. Operating the beam slightly above the $3\pi$ point at 5.2 kV compensates for the smaller interaction impedance at high frequencies and flattens the gain. In a 60-cell copper structure with input and output couplers, the simulated small-signal gain peaks at 19 dB at 58 GHz, the 3-dB bandwidth spans 55–68 GHz, and saturation gives 741 mW at 62 GHz.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the fabricated structure preserves the alternating pillar pattern exactly enough that no bandgap opens, and that the 11 mA sheet beam stays confined under a practical magnet system as well as it does under the simulated uniform field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A TWT built from this structure should amplify across 55–68 GHz with less than 3 dB of gain variation, peaking at 19 dB at 58 GHz.
  • Backward-wave oscillation risk is largely removed by the glide-symmetry-induced zero of on-axis backward-wave impedance, so stability effort can concentrate on regenerative oscillations from port mismatches.
  • The design reaches bandwidth comparable to staggered double-grating TWTs while synchronizing at 5.2 kV instead of about 20 kV, a regime suited to field-emitter-array cathodes.
  • The demonstrated efficiency is low (about 1.2%), but the paper's scaling argument predicts it can be raised by increasing beam current or by choosing a lower-frequency, more narrowband operating point with higher interaction impedance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the backward-wave impedance vanishes only under exact glide symmetry and for an on-axis beam, real beams with finite thickness and transverse displacement will see a small nonzero backward interaction; quantifying that residual as a function of beam offset is a natural next step the paper does not take.
  • The paper gives no tolerance budget, but its own warning implies a testable design rule: the half-period stagger must be held much tighter than the bandgap width it would create near $3\pi$, so a sensitivity sweep of stagger error versus gain bandwidth would tell fabricators how precise the assembly must be.
  • The uniform 0.7 T solenoid is a stand-in for a periodic permanent-magnet system; a plausible extension is to simulate the same 60-cell structure with a periodic cusped field to see whether beam confinement and stability survive without adding parasitic modes.
  • The low-voltage, wideband operating point trades efficiency for bandwidth; increasing the diamond cathode's area compression to raise beam current could push efficiency toward the values of higher-voltage staggered-grating designs while keeping the 5.2 kV synchronism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a V-band sheet-beam TWT slow-wave structure based on a rectangular waveguide with staggered rectangular pillars. The design exploits glide symmetry to close the 3π bandgap and to suppress the on-axis backward-wave interaction impedance. The unit-cell dimensions, beam parameters (5.2 kV, 11 mA), and coupler dimensions are specified. CST eigenmode simulations give the dispersion, phase velocity, and interaction impedance; cold-S-parameter simulations for a 60-cell structure give a -10 dB match over 16.6 GHz. PIC simulations yield a peak small-signal gain of 19 dB at 58 GHz, a 3-dB gain bandwidth of 13.1 GHz (55-68 GHz), and a saturation output power of about 741 mW at 62 GHz, corresponding to 1.2% DC-to-RF efficiency. Appendices describe the coupler, the vanishing backward-wave impedance, and assembly considerations.

Significance. The design idea is significant because glide symmetry offers a path to wide bandwidth at a substantially lower beam voltage (5.2 kV) than comparable staggered double-grating designs (typically approximately 20 kV), which is attractive for compact sheet-beam TWTs using field-emitter cathodes. The paper is unusually complete in specifying all dimensions, mesh and particle counts, and the Appendix B simulation independently reproduces the zero on-axis backward-wave impedance, so the central design result does not reduce to a fitted quantity. The cold and PIC numbers are internally consistent, for example the synchronization point at approximately 66 GHz matches the stated small-signal response. The main limitation is that the headline results are unconditional simulation results for an ideal glide-symmetric structure with an idealized uniform solenoid; the practical robustness of the symmetry and beam transport is not demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, after Fig. 1] The paper states that tight tolerances are required to preserve glide symmetry and that breaking it produces biperiodicity, a bandgap at the 3π point, reduced bandwidth, and possible oscillations, but it provides no quantitative tolerance or sensitivity analysis. Since the claimed 22% bandwidth and the BWO-suppression property both rest on exact glide symmetry, the manuscript should give a bound on allowed asymmetry, for example pillar staggering error or sidewall misalignment, and show how dispersion, the 3π bandgap, and interaction impedance degrade within that bound. Without this, the practical relevance of the design for microfabrication at V-band is unverified.
  2. [Section III, paragraph beginning 'Using the PIC solver'] The PIC gain and saturation results are obtained with a uniform 0.7 T solenoid, and the paper concedes that a periodic magnetic confinement system will be necessary in practice. Beam interception or altered transverse beam dynamics under a periodic cusped or staggered PCM could change the effective current and gain, and the interaction of the PCM with the SWS modes is not addressed. A beam-transport simulation with the proposed focusing scheme, or at least a discussion of the beam interception sensitivity to the magnetic field, is needed to support the claimed gain and output power as representative of a practical device.
  3. [Section III, PIC setup sentence] The PIC results are based on 4.5 million mesh cells and 3.6 million particles, but no convergence study is reported. Given that the headline claims of 19 dB gain, 13.1 GHz bandwidth, and 741 mW saturation power are quantitative, the manuscript should show that these numbers are stable with respect to mesh refinement and particle count, and ideally with respect to simulation time and steady-state criterion.
  4. [Appendix B and Section II] The backward-wave-impedance argument is qualitative: Fig. 11 shows a small but nonzero backward-wave interaction impedance near the beam edges, yet no start-oscillation current or gain margin is computed for the 60-cell structure. Since the abstract claims stable operation, the paper should relate the residual backward-wave impedance to a start-oscillation criterion and show that the 11 mA operating current is below it, including the effect of port mismatches because the coupler S11 is finite.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'topological properties' is used loosely; the paper does not compute a topological invariant. Consider using 'symmetry-induced properties' or providing a reference that defines the topological nature of the glide-symmetry effect.
  2. [Section II, Fig. 3] The synchronization condition should be labeled on the phase-velocity plot with the exact beam line or the operating point; the text refers to 66 GHz and βnd = 3.3π, but the figure caption does not identify these values.
  3. [Appendix A] The sentence 'The TE10 mode ... couples to the SWS through the SWS's Ez field directly' is potentially confusing because TE10 has no longitudinal electric field; clarify that the TE10 mode of the feed excites a mode with Ez in the ridged SWS region.
  4. [Table II] The table heading lists 's l r' while the text and figure use lr; standardize the notation for the ramp length.
  5. [Fig. 7] The text says the smaller gain peak is at 68 GHz, but the figure axes and the bandwidth statement should be annotated so the 3-dB limits at 55 and 68 GHz are clearly visible.
  6. [Section III, comparison paragraph] Reference [21] is a helix TWT with a pencil beam; the comparison should state explicitly that the beam and circuit type differ from the sheet-beam design, to avoid implying a direct efficiency comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the glide-symmetry bandgap closure and backward-wave impedance suppression are reproduced by the paper's own CST simulations, and the gain/efficiency numbers are fresh PIC outputs rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The wideband design is grounded in (i) a cold dispersion calculation (Fig. 2) showing the even/odd mode crossing at beta_n d = 3 pi without a stopband, which is a computed eigenmode result and not a fitted parameter; (ii) interaction-impedance calculations (Fig. 5) and coupling design (Appendix A); and (iii) CST PIC simulations (Figs. 7-8) that produce the 13.1 GHz 3-dB gain bandwidth, 19 dB peak gain, and 741 mW saturated output power from an explicit 60-cell model with copper walls. The vanishing on-axis backward-wave interaction impedance is demonstrated in the paper's own Appendix B / Fig. 11 by an independent CST eigenmode calculation, so the self-authored citations [23] and [25] (which include author Capolino) are corroborative rather than load-bearing: even if those citations were removed, the numerical demonstrations in this manuscript remain. The authors also explicitly flag the genuine practical limitations (tight GS fabrication tolerances, need for periodic magnetic confinement, coupler/window simplifications), and those external-validity concerns are not circularity. No parameter is fitted to the predicted gain/efficiency data; the only free choices are geometric dimensions and operating point, and the output metrics are simulation results. Hence no circular step exists.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard electromagnetic theory, commercial simulation software, and literature results on glide symmetry. The main ad hoc choices are the geometry dimensions, beam voltage, beam current, and focusing field; these are design inputs rather than fitted results, but they are tuned by hand and not justified by an optimization or sensitivity study.

free parameters (6)
  • Unit cell dimensions (a, b, d, w, l, t) = 1.4, 0.8, 1.05, 1.08, 0.27, 0.1 mm
    Hand-selected to set dispersion and velocity synchronization; no optimization or sensitivity study is given.
  • Beam voltage V0 = 5.2 kV
    Chosen so the slow space-charge wave synchronizes near βnd=3.3π; appears as a design input, not a derived result.
  • Beam current I0 = 11 mA
    Follows from an assumed 20 A/cm2 diamond FEA current density with 4:1 area compression; the FEA is not part of this demonstration.
  • Beam cross-section wb, tb and clearance g = 0.55, 0.1, 0.1 mm
    Chosen for interaction impedance and interception risk; values are stated without optimization.
  • Focusing magnetic field Bz = 0.7 T
    Uniform solenoid used in PIC; the paper states a periodic magnetic focusing system will be needed in practice.
  • Coupler dimensions (a2, b2, wt, tt, s, lr) = 3.76, 0.39, 0.75, 0.3, 0.19, 0.6 mm
    Hand-tuned for matching; coupler behavior affects the reported 16.6 GHz cold match bandwidth.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Glide symmetry closes the bandgap at the 3π point and forces the on-axis Ez component of the backward even mode to vanish.
    Taken from refs [22] and [25] and reproduced numerically in Appendix B (Fig. 11); it is the physical basis for the wideband and stability claims.
  • domain assumption CST Studio Suite eigenmode, frequency-domain, and PIC solvers give accurate cold dispersion, interaction impedance, S-parameters, and beam-wave gain for this structure.
    All quantitative results come from CST 2022 with 4.5M mesh cells and 3.6M particles; no convergence study or independent solver comparison is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The ideal, perfectly glide-symmetric copper geometry in simulation represents the structure that would be fabricated and assembled.
    The paper acknowledges that fabrication tolerances can break GS and open a bandgap, but no tolerance analysis is given, so the simulation depends on an idealized geometry.
  • domain assumption An 11 mA sheet beam can be transported through the 60-cell SWS without interception or instability using the assumed focusing.
    PIC uses a uniform 0.7 T solenoid; the authors note a periodic magnetic confinement system will be needed in practice, so the transport model is an assumption, not a demonstrated design.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wideband Glide-Symmetric Slow-Wave Structure for Millimeter-Wave Sheet Beam TWTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A7EFG47B

@misc{pith2026250522927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wideband Glide-Symmetric Slow-Wave Structure for Millimeter-Wave Sheet Beam TWTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A7EFG47B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22927}
}
abstract

We introduce a slow-wave structure (SWS) for a millimeter-wave sheet-beam traveling-wave tube (TWT) with wide bandwidth. The wideband and stable operation is enabled through the topological properties associated with glide-symmetry that close the bandgap at the $3\pi$-point and also make the on-axis interaction impedance negligible for the backward wave. This space harmonic structure is designed to operate in the $V$-band over 55-68 GHz with synchronism to a 5.2 kV, 11 mA sheet electron beam that will be produced by a diamond field-emitter array.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22927 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unit cell of the periodic structure with sheet electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dispersion diagram of modes in the cold SWS. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase velocity of forward even mode (solid blue) over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Finite length SWS consisting of input coupler, output [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Electric field distribution of even eigenmode that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Interaction impedance for the forward even mode as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Output power vs input drive for the TWT at a center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) The small interaction impedance for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scattering parameters for the 60-cell cold SWS with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Surface currents of the forward even mode in the unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_12.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Propagation in periodically loaded waveguides with higher symmetries,

    A. Hessel, M. H. Chen, R. C. Li, and A. A. Oliner, “Propagation in periodically loaded waveguides with higher symmetries,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 183–195, 1973

    work page 1973

  2. [25]

    Wide band interaction impedance and mode excitation in glide symmetric double corrugated waveguides for mm-wave twts,

    N. Castro, M. Saavedra-Melo, E. Rajo-Iglesias, and F. Capolino, “Wide band interaction impedance and mode excitation in glide symmetric double corrugated waveguides for mm-wave twts,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Millimeter wave traveling wave tubes for the 21st century,

    C. Paoloni, D. Gamzina, R. Letizia, Y . Zheng, and N. C. Luhmann Jr, “Millimeter wave traveling wave tubes for the 21st century,” Journal of MAROSI et. al. : WIDEBAND GS SWS FOR MM-W A VE SHEET BEAM TWTS, UC IRVINE, APRIL 2025 7 Electromagnetic Waves and Applications , vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 567–603, 2021

    work page 2025

  4. [2]

    Frontiers in the application of RF vacuum electronics,

    C. M. Armstrong, E. C. Snively, M. Shumail, C. Nantista, Z. Li, S. Tantawi, B. W. Loo, R. J. Temkin, R. G. Griffin, J. Feng et al. , “Frontiers in the application of RF vacuum electronics,” IEEE transac- tions on electron devices , vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 2643–2655, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Wideband RF structure for millimeter wave twts,

    L. Earley, B. Carlsten, F. Krawczyk, J. Potter, F. Sigler, E. Smirnova, R. Wheat, C. Heath, and A. Bailey, “Wideband RF structure for millimeter wave twts,” in AIP Conference Proceedings , vol. 807, no. 1. American Institute of Physics, 2006, pp. 335–341

    work page 2006

  6. [4]

    Microfabrication of high-frequency vacuum electron de- vices,

    R. L. Ives, “Microfabrication of high-frequency vacuum electron de- vices,” IEEE Transactions on plasma science , vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1277– 1291, 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [5]

    Evaluation of some slow-wave vane structures for aminiature traveling-wave tube at 30 ghz,

    F. Kavanagh, B. Ebihara, T. M. Wallett, and J. A. Dayton Jr, “Evaluation of some slow-wave vane structures for aminiature traveling-wave tube at 30 ghz,” Tech. Rep., 1994

    work page 1994

  8. [6]

    Microfabrication and characterization of a selectively metallized w-band meander-line twt circuit,

    S. Sengele, H. Jiang, J. H. Booske, C. L. Kory, D. W. Van der Weide, and R. L. Ives, “Microfabrication and characterization of a selectively metallized w-band meander-line twt circuit,” IEEE transactions on electron devices, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 730–737, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 43 references
  1. [7]

    Design and fabrication of a novel high power thz slow wave structure based on mems technology,

    H. Zheng, J. Yao, R. Zheng, Q. Zhang, and X. Lu, “Design and fabrication of a novel high power thz slow wave structure based on mems technology,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series , vol. 2002, no. 1. IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012059

    2002

  2. [8]

    Experimental investigations on miniaturized vacuum electron devices,

    S.-T. Han, S.-G. Jeon, Y .-M. Shin, K.-H. Jang, J.-K. So, J.-H. Kim, S.- S. Chang, and G.-S. Park, “Experimental investigations on miniaturized vacuum electron devices,” in IVESC 2004. The 5th International V acuum Electron Sources Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX839...

    2004

  3. [9]

    Novel coupled- cavity twt structure using two-step liga fabrication,

    Y .-M. Shin, G.-S. Park, G. P. Scheitrum, and B. Arfin, “Novel coupled- cavity twt structure using two-step liga fabrication,” IEEE transactions on plasma science , vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1317–1324, 2003

    2003

  4. [10]

    Theory of the large signal behavior of traveling-wave amplifiers,

    A. Nordsieck, “Theory of the large signal behavior of traveling-wave amplifiers,” Proceedings of the IRE , vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 630–637, 1953

    1953

  5. [11]

    Planar microstrip slow-wave structure for low-voltage v-band traveling-wave tube with a sheet electron beam,

    N. M. Ryskin, A. G. Rozhnev, A. V . Starodubov, A. A. Serdobintsev, A. M. Pavlov, A. I. Benedik, R. A. Torgashov, G. V . Torgashov, and N. I. Sinitsyn, “Planar microstrip slow-wave structure for low-voltage v-band traveling-wave tube with a sheet electron beam,” IEEE Electron ...

    2018

  6. [12]

    Study on w-band sheet-beam traveling-wave tube based on flat-roofed sine waveguide,

    S. Fang, J. Xu, X. Jiang, X. Lei, G. Wu, Q. Li, C. Ding, X. Yu, W. Wang, Y . Gonget al., “Study on w-band sheet-beam traveling-wave tube based on flat-roofed sine waveguide,” AIP Advances , vol. 8, no. 5, 2018

    2018

  7. [13]

    Demonstration of a wideband 10-kw ka-band sheet beam twt amplifier,

    D. E. Pershing, K. T. Nguyen, D. K. Abe, E. Wright, P. B. Larsen, J. Pasour, S. J. Cooke, A. Balkcum, F. N. Wood, R. E. Myers et al. , “Demonstration of a wideband 10-kw ka-band sheet beam twt amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1637–1642, 2014

    2014

  8. [14]

    Modeling investigation of an ultrawideband terahertz sheet beam traveling-wave tube amplifier circuit,

    Y .-M. Shin, A. Baig, L. R. Barnett, N. C. Luhmann, J. Pasour, and P. Larsen, “Modeling investigation of an ultrawideband terahertz sheet beam traveling-wave tube amplifier circuit,” IEEE transactions on elec- tron devices, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 3213–3218, 2011

    2011

  9. [15]

    Development of a 100-w 200-ghz high bandwidth mm-wave amplifier,

    M. Field, T. Kimura, J. Atkinson, D. Gamzina, N. C. Luhmann, B. Stockwell, T. J. Grant, Z. Griffith, R. Borwick, C. Hillman et al. , “Development of a 100-w 200-ghz high bandwidth mm-wave amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2122–2128, 2018

    2018

  10. [16]

    Design and analysis of the staggered double grating slow wave circuit for 263 ghz sheet beam twt,

    Y . Zheng, D. Gamzina, L. Himes, M. Gonzalez, and N. C. Luhmann, “Design and analysis of the staggered double grating slow wave circuit for 263 ghz sheet beam twt,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 411–418, 2020

    2020

  11. [17]

    Gain analysis of a 0.2-thz traveling- wave tube with sheet electron beam and staggered grating slow wave structure,

    T. A. Karetnikova, A. G. Rozhnev, N. M. Ryskin, A. E. Fedotov, S. V . Mishakin, and N. S. Ginzburg, “Gain analysis of a 0.2-thz traveling- wave tube with sheet electron beam and staggered grating slow wave structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , vol. 65, no. 6, pp....

    2018

  12. [18]

    Fabrication of enhanced diamond field emitter arrays for thz vacuum tubes,

    D. Kim, H. L. Andrews, C.-C. Chang, E. I. Simakov, and M. Zuboraj, “Fabrication of enhanced diamond field emitter arrays for thz vacuum tubes,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS), 2023, pp. 1–1

    2023

  13. [19]

    Field-emitter arrays for vacuum microelectronics,

    C. Spindt, C. Holland, A. Rosengreen, and I. Brodie, “Field-emitter arrays for vacuum microelectronics,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2355–2363, 1991

    1991

  14. [20]

    Arrays of gated field-emitter cones having 0.32 µm tip-to-tip spacing,

    C. O. Bozler, C. T. Harris, S. Rabe, D. D. Rathman, M. A. Hollis, and H. I. Smith, “Arrays of gated field-emitter cones having 0.32 µm tip-to-tip spacing,” Journal of V acuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenome...

    1994

  15. [21]

    Application of field emitter arrays to microwave power amplifiers,

    D. R. Whaley, B. M. Gannon, C. R. Smith, C. M. Armstrong, and C. A. Spindt, “Application of field emitter arrays to microwave power amplifiers,” IEEE transactions on plasma science , vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 727–747, 2000

    2000

  16. [23]

    Wideband glide-symmetric double-corrugated gap- waveguide traveling-wave tube for millimeter waves,

    M. Saavedra-Melo, N. Castro, R. Marosi, E. Rajo-Iglesias, and F. Capolino, “Wideband glide-symmetric double-corrugated gap- waveguide traveling-wave tube for millimeter waves,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.05238, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Demonstration of a high efficiency and wide band 30-w g-band continuous wave traveling wave tube,

    X. Bian, P. Pan, X. Du, B. Song, L. Zhang, J. Cai, and J. Feng, “Demonstration of a high efficiency and wide band 30-w g-band continuous wave traveling wave tube,” IEEE Electron Device Letters , 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Staggered-vane traveling- wave tube (svtwt) amplifier for high-power v-band applications: Design, fabrication, and test,

    Y .-M. Shin, B. Stockwell, R. Begum, A. Moyer, K. Childs, C. Nilsen, L. Roeder, M. Cusick, P. Kolda, and T. Grant, “Staggered-vane traveling- wave tube (svtwt) amplifier for high-power v-band applications: Design, fabrication, and test,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices ,...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Demonstration of a high power, wideband 220-ghz traveling wave amplifier fabricated by uv-liga,

    C. D. Joye, A. M. Cook, J. P. Calame, D. K. Abe, A. N. Vlasov, I. A. Chernyavskiy, K. T. Nguyen, E. L. Wright, D. E. Pershing, T. Kimura et al., “Demonstration of a high power, wideband 220-ghz traveling wave amplifier fabricated by uv-liga,” IEEE transactions on electron devi...

    2014

  20. [28]

    Passband broadening of sub-wavelength resonator-based glide-symmetric siw fil- ters,

    J. Mart ´ınez, A. Coves, F. Mesa, and O. Quevedo-Teruel, “Passband broadening of sub-wavelength resonator-based glide-symmetric siw fil- ters,” AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications , vol. 125, p. 153362, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Design methodology and experimental verification of serpentine/folded-waveguide twts,

    K. T. Nguyen, A. N. Vlasov, L. Ludeking, C. D. Joye, A. M. Cook, J. P. Calame, J. A. Pasour, D. E. Pershing, E. L. Wright, S. J. Cooke et al. , “Design methodology and experimental verification of serpentine/folded-waveguide twts,” IEEE Transactions on Electron De- vices, vol....

    2014

  22. [30]

    Characteristics study of 3π stopbands of folded waveguide slow-wave structures in v-band traveling- wave tubes,

    S. Liu, J. Cai, J. Feng, and X. Wu, “Characteristics study of 3π stopbands of folded waveguide slow-wave structures in v-band traveling- wave tubes,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1294–1298, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Design and fabrication of a dielectric-supported symmetric dual meander-line slow wave structure,

    Y . Wang, D. Xu, L. Yang, J. Guo, D. Yang, Y . Zheng, Z. Wang, Z. Lu, S. Wang, and Y . Gong, “Design and fabrication of a dielectric-supported symmetric dual meander-line slow wave structure,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Planar slow-wave structure with parasitic mode control,

    L. B. Nguyen, T. M. Antonsen, and G. S. Nusinovich, “Planar slow-wave structure with parasitic mode control,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1655–1660, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Symmetric double v-shaped microstrip meander-line slow- wave structure for w-band traveling-wave tube,

    F. Shen, Y . Wei, X. Xu, Y . Liu, M. Huang, T. Tang, Z. Duan, and Y . Gong, “Symmetric double v-shaped microstrip meander-line slow- wave structure for w-band traveling-wave tube,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1551–1557, 2012

    2012

  26. [34]

    w-band traveling wave tube amplifier based on planar slow wave structure,

    G. Ulisse and V . Krozer, “ w-band traveling wave tube amplifier based on planar slow wave structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters , vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 126–129, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    ka- band symmetric v-shaped meander-line slow wave structure,

    S. Wang, S. Aditya, X. Xia, Z. Ali, J. Miao, and Y . Zheng, “ ka- band symmetric v-shaped meander-line slow wave structure,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4650–4657, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Traveling-wave amplifiers,

    J. W. Gewartowski and H. A. Watson, “Traveling-wave amplifiers,” in Principles of electron tubes: including grid-controlled tubes, microwave tubes, and gas tubes . Van Nostrand, 1965, ch. 10, p. 357

    1965

  29. [37]

    Theoretical and experimental research on a novel small tunable pcm system in staggered double vane twt,

    X. Shi, Z. Wang, T. Tang, H. Gong, Y . Wei, Z. Duan, X. Tang, Y . Wang, J. Feng, and Y . Gong, “Theoretical and experimental research on a novel small tunable pcm system in staggered double vane twt,” IEEE Transactions on electron devices , vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4258–4264, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    Stability and confinement of nonrelativistic sheet electron beams with periodic cusped magnetic focusing,

    J. H. Booske, B. D. McVey, and T. M. Antonsen Jr, “Stability and confinement of nonrelativistic sheet electron beams with periodic cusped magnetic focusing,” Journal of applied physics , vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 4140– 4155, 1993

    1993

  31. [39]

    Periodic magnetic focusing of sheet electron beams,

    J. H. Booske, M. A. Basten, A. Kumbasar, T. M. Antonsen Jr, S. W. Bidwell, Y . Carmel, W. W. Destler, V . L. Granatstein, and D. J. Radack, “Periodic magnetic focusing of sheet electron beams,” Physics of plasmas , vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1714–1720, 1994

    1994

  32. [40]

    Staggered closed pcm for stable rectangular sheet electron beam transport,

    P. C. Panda, V . Srivastava, and A. V ohra, “Staggered closed pcm for stable rectangular sheet electron beam transport,” IEEE transactions on electron devices, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2918–2923, 2013. MAROSI et. al. : WIDEBAND GS SWS FOR MM-W A VE SHEET BEAM TWTS, UC IRVINE, APRIL 2025 8

    2013

  33. [41]

    Intense sheet electron beam transport in a uniform solenoidal magnetic field,

    K. T. Nguyen, J. A. Pasour, T. M. Antonsen, P. B. Larsen, J. J. Petillo, and B. Levush, “Intense sheet electron beam transport in a uniform solenoidal magnetic field,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 744–752, 2009

    2009

  34. [42]

    Investigation of a novel planar meander slot- line slow-wave structure,

    Y . Wang, S. Wang, Y . Dong, J. Guo, D. Xu, Y . Zheng, Z. Wang, Z. Lu, H. Gong, Z. Duan et al. , “Investigation of a novel planar meander slot- line slow-wave structure,” IEEE Electron Device Letters , vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 476–479, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    A staggered vane-shaped slot-line slow-wave structure for w- band dual-sheet electron-beam-traveling wave tubes,

    Y . Wang, J. Guo, Y . Dong, D. Xu, Y . Zheng, Z. Lu, Z. Wang, and S. Wang, “A staggered vane-shaped slot-line slow-wave structure for w- band dual-sheet electron-beam-traveling wave tubes,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 3709, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.