Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 1 cited by

Constraining shear modulus of polycrystalline neutron star crust: Hashin-Shtrikman variational approach

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The neutron star crust's effective shear modulus lies in a Hashin-Shtrikman band that excludes the standard Voigt estimate under uncorrelated crystallites.

desk verdict First application of Hashin-Shtrikman bounds to neutron star crust; solid, honest, and with the right caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12266 v1 pith:AAIGQZ3D submitted 2025-07-16 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-ph

Nikita A. Zemlyakov , Andrey I. Chugunov (Ioffe Institute) This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-ph
keywords neutronstarcrustshearmodulusHashin-ShtrikmanboundspolycrystallinematterCoulombcrystalVoigt-Reusselasticpropertieswhitedwarfcore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the effective shear modulus of a polycrystalline neutron star crust or white dwarf core is not a single calculable number but is constrained to a band whose endpoints are given by the Hashin-Shtrikman variational bounds. Because the crust is locally assumed isotropic, its elasticity reduces to bulk and shear moduli; the bulk modulus is already fixed by cubic symmetry, while the shear modulus is not. The paper shows that, for a static one-component Coulomb crystal, the allowed interval is roughly 50 percent narrower than the Voigt-Reuss interval: $0.0712 \le \mu \le 0.1028$ in units of $n Z^2 e^2 / a$, whereas Voigt gives $0.1195$ and Reuss gives $0.0510$. It then extends the bounds to screened Yukawa crystals, crystals with thermal and zero-point nuclear motion, and ordered binary Coulomb crystals. A reader should care because crust shear stiffness enters glitch, torsional oscillation, and gravitational-wave models, and the widely used Voigt estimate lies above the upper Hashin-Shtrikman bound.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Hashin-Shtrikman variational principle for polycrystals of cubic crystallites. It supplies explicit algebraic bounds by comparing the actual displacement field with a reference isotropic material and choosing the reference shear modulus equal to the two single-crystal shear stiffnesses, $c_{44}$ and $(c_{11}-c_{12})/2$; because the crust bulk modulus $K$ is much larger than these shear stiffnesses, the simplified forms depend only on shear coefficients. The approach requires no assumption about crystallite shape, only that orientation correlations of any order are absent.

What would settle it

A molecular-dynamics or phase-field simulation of a polycrystalline Coulomb crystal with deliberately correlated crystallite orientations, measuring the effective shear modulus directly, would settle whether the Hashin-Shtrikman interval can be violated; a measured value outside $[0.0712, 0.1028]$ in static bcc Coulomb units would falsify the paper's central claim as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, under the assumption of uncorrelated crystallite orientations, the effective shear modulus of neutron star crust matter obeys $\mu_{\mathrm{HS}}^{(1)} \le \mu \le \mu_{\mathrm{HS}}^{(2)}$, and these Hashin-Shtrikman bounds are strictly tighter than the Voigt-Reuss bounds. For the static one-component Coulomb crystal with a bcc lattice, $\mu_R = 0.0510$, $\mu_{\mathrm{HS}}^{(1)} = 0.0712$, $\mu_{\mathrm{HS}}^{(2)} = 0.1028$, and $\mu_V = 0.1195$; thus the Voigt estimate, the value most astrophysical models use, overestimates the shear modulus within these assumptions. Electron screening and nuclear motion lower both bounds, and the same bracketing holds for Yukawa and ordered binary crystals; at charge ratio $R_Z \approx 2.29$ the bounds merge because the crystallites become elastically isotropic. The paper does not claim to know the exact effective shear modulus; it claims that the true value must lie in the stated interval unless crystallite orientations are correlated.

Load-bearing premise

The entire tightness of the bounds rests on the assumption that crystallite orientations are completely uncorrelated; if growth processes such as epitaxy align crystallites, the true shear modulus can lie outside the Hashin-Shtrikman interval.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Models of torsional crust oscillations, glitches, and crust-breaking events that use the Voigt estimate are stiffer than the Hashin-Shtrikman upper bound permits; within the stated assumptions they should use the Hashin-Shtrikman interval or at least not exceed $\mu_{\mathrm{HS}}^{(2)}$.
  • Electron screening and nuclear motion lower both bounds, so the effective stiffness is reduced further in deeper, hotter, or more neutron-rich layers.
  • The self-consistent estimate of Kobyakov and Pethick lies inside the Hashin-Shtrikman interval, so it remains a plausible point value but is not guaranteed by the same assumptions.
  • At charge ratio $R_Z \approx 2.29$ in ordered binary crystals, all estimates coincide, so in that special composition the effective shear modulus is insensitive to microstructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if epitaxial growth produces correlated crystallite orientations, the effective shear modulus could fall outside the Hashin-Shtrikman interval, so the bounds should be used only as conditional constraints until crust microstructure is known.
  • Editorial extension: the same variational machinery could be applied to nuclear pasta phases or amorphous solids, where anisotropy and shape correlations play a role, but this paper does not address those cases.
  • Editorial extension: observational inference may help test this claim, since a crustal torsional oscillation frequency that requires shear stiffness above the Hashin-Shtrikman upper bound would indicate either correlated growth or unmodeled physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Hashin-Shtrikman (HS) variational bounds to constrain the effective shear modulus of polycrystalline matter in neutron star crusts and white-dwarf cores. Under the stated assumptions of local isotropy and uncorrelated crystallite orientations, the HS formulas for cubic crystallites are specialized and simplified in the crust-appropriate limit K >> c44, c11 - c12. The bounds are then evaluated for static one-component Coulomb crystals, Yukawa crystals, Coulomb crystals with phonon corrections, and ordered binary (sc2) crystals. For the static bcc Coulomb crystal the HS interval is [0.0712, 0.1028] in units of n Z^2 e^2 / a, substantially narrower than the Voigt-Reuss interval [0.0510, 0.1195]; the self-consistent estimate falls inside. Fitting formulae are provided for astrophysical applications, and the paper concludes that, within its stated assumptions, the Voigt estimate typically overestimates the effective shear modulus.

Significance. The central derivation is sound: the HS bounds from Refs. [45,46] are correctly specialized to cubic crystallites, the K-dominated simplification of Eqs. (11)-(12) is justified for crust conditions, and the numerical evaluations are consistent with the known elastic constants. The main contribution is a parameter-free tightening of the Voigt-Reuss interval for the shear modulus, with practical fitting formulae covering electron screening, phonon corrections, and binary crystals. I particularly note the paper's transparency: Section IV explicitly states that the uncorrelated-crystallite assumption 'is not proved for stellar matter,' and the conclusions are framed conditionally. This caveat is the only load-bearing limitation I see; it does not constitute an internal inconsistency. The paper should be a useful reference for glitch, oscillation, and gravitational-wave modeling.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (13)] The argument of the square root should be written as sqrt(1 + 12(c11 - c12)/c44); as typeset, the expression is ambiguous and could be misread as sqrt(1 + 12 c11 - c12/c44).
  2. [Section IV] The phrase 'We straighten constraints' should read 'We tighten constraints'; in the same section, 'the bounds becomes broader' should be 'the bounds become broader.'
  3. [Section III.B and Fig. 1] The fitting formula (16) is calibrated for kappa a < 1, but the plotted curves extend to kappa a = 3; the caption or text should state that the curves beyond kappa a = 1 are extrapolations.
  4. [Section III.C, Eq. (18)] The right-hand side of Eq. (18), denoted mu(T = 0), is the static-lattice value excluding zero-point phonon corrections; this should be stated explicitly, since Eq. (18) at T = 0 still contains the b_q term.
  5. [Section II.C] The simplified bounds (11) and (12) are derived in the limit K >> c44, c11 - c12; please add a sentence quantifying the small finite-K correction or stating explicitly that it is negligible at crust densities.
  6. [Section III.C] The statement 'By construction, our approximation for the Voigt estimate coincides with formulae suggested by [24]' is stronger than the preceding description of matching two asymptotic limits; please rephrase or justify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds are an external variational theorem applied to independently calculated monocrystal elastic coefficients; the few self-citations provide analytic Voigt formulations only and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds (Eqs. 9-12) are taken from the external variational theory of Refs. [45, 46, 52]; the monocrystal elastic coefficients (c44, c11 - c12) feeding those formulae come from independent prior calculations, not fitted in this paper. For the static Coulomb crystal, c44 and c11 - c12 are quoted from Ewald-summation calculations [21, 24, 26, 31]; for Yukawa crystals the coefficients use fits from Ref. [21]; phonon corrections use fits from Ref. [24]; binary crystals use Ref. [26]. None of these inputs encodes the target conclusion. The central claim that the effective shear modulus is bounded by mu_HS(1) <= mu <= mu_HS(2) with mu_HS(2) = 0.1028 < mu_V = 0.1195 follows from the external HS theorem applied to those external coefficients; it is not a fit to data that mu_V was intended to predict. The paper's own fitting expressions (Eqs. 16, 18, 20) are presented as interpolation formulas for convenience and are calibrated to the very quantities they describe, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations [33, 34] supply the analytic Voigt expression and screening-correction remarks; the Voigt estimate is also derived by the standard rotational-invariant route [50], so these self-citations are not load-bearing. The no-correlation microstructural premise is stated explicitly and its limitation (epitaxial growth producing correlated crystallites) is honestly acknowledged in Section IV; this is a caveat on applicability to real stellar matter, not a circular step. Overall the derivation is a legitimate first application of an established bound to independent inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The rigorous Hashin-Shtrikman bounds are parameter-free once the monocrystal elastic coefficients are supplied. The many listed coefficients are transparent curve-fitting parameters for the approximate formulas (16), (18), and (20), which summarize previously computed numerical data. No new physical entity is introduced, and none of the fit parameters is used to force the main conclusion.

free parameters (8)
  • dY(bcc) = 0.29 (Reuss), 0.27 (HS lower), 0.24 (self-consistent), 0.23 (HS upper), 0.23 (Voigt)
    Screening fit coefficient in Eq. (16) for bcc Yukawa polycrystals; fitted to elastic coefficients from Kozhberov (2022), intended for kappa a < 1.
  • dY(fcc) = 0.16 (Reuss), 0.18 (HS lower), 0.21 (self-consistent), 0.22 (HS upper), 0.23 (Voigt)
    Screening fit coefficient in Eq. (16) for fcc Yukawa polycrystals; fitted to Kozhberov (2022) elastic coefficients.
  • bq = 0.090 (Reuss), 0.151 (HS lower), 0.258 (self-consistent), 0.305 (HS upper), 0.369 (Voigt)
    Quantum-limit coefficient in the phonon correction fit Eq. (18); adjusted to reproduce the T << Tp asymptotes of Baiko (2011) fits.
  • bcl = 2.91 (Reuss), 3.79 (HS lower), 4.31 (self-consistent), 4.57 (HS upper), 5.15 (Voigt)
    Classical-limit coefficient in the phonon correction fit Eq. (18); adjusted to reproduce the T >> Tp asymptotes of Baiko (2011) fits.
  • b0 (binary sc2 fit) = 0.425 (Reuss), 0.593 (HS lower), 0.775 (self-consistent), 0.857 (HS upper)
    Zero-order coefficient in Eq. (20) for the ordered binary sc2 lattice; ratios to the ion-sphere Voigt estimate from the one-component limit.
  • b1 (binary sc2 fit) = 0.36 (Reuss), 0.83 (HS lower), 0.38 (self-consistent), 0.11 (HS upper)
    First-order coefficient in Eq. (20) for the binary sc2 lattice; fitted to elastic data from Kozhberov (2019).
  • b2 (binary sc2 fit) = 0.001 (Reuss), 0.007 (HS lower), -0.01 (self-consistent), -0.002 (HS upper)
    Second-order coefficient in Eq. (20) for the binary sc2 lattice; fitted to Kozhberov (2019) elastic data.
  • bV0 = 0.995
    Multiplicative constant in the Voigt estimate fit for the binary sc2 crystal, around Eq. (20).
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Hashin-Shtrikman variational theorem for isotropic and homogeneous polycrystals of cubic crystallites, giving Eqs. (9) and (10).
    The theorem is quoted from Refs. [45, 46] and not rederived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The neutron star crust is locally isotropic on macroscopic scales.
    Stated in the Introduction as the commonly believed assumption; the authors acknowledge that epitaxial growth could make the crust anisotropic.
  • domain assumption Crystallite orientations are uncorrelated, with correlation functions of any order isotropic and homogeneous.
    Introduced in Section II.C as the assumption underlying the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds; the authors flag it as unproved for stellar matter.
  • domain assumption The monocrystal elastic coefficients c11, c12, and c44 from Refs. [21, 24, 26] are accurate for the models considered.
    All numerical bounds inherit the accuracy of the input elastic coefficients from prior Coulomb, Yukawa, and binary-lattice calculations.
  • domain assumption The bulk modulus K of the crust greatly exceeds c44 and c11 - c12, allowing Eqs. (11) and (12).
    Used in Section II.C and justified by the dominance of electron and neutron pressure contributions in the crust.
  • domain assumption Leading-order Thomas-Fermi screening, represented by the Yukawa potential, is sufficient for the screening corrections discussed in Section III.B.
    The authors state the Yukawa approach is a leading-order approximation and may be inaccurate for order (kappa a)^4 corrections.
  • domain assumption The harmonic lattice approximation describes nuclear motion, with anharmonic corrections neglected.
    Inherited from Baiko (2011) [24] and stated in Section III.C to be inaccurate close to the melting temperature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining shear modulus of polycrystalline neutron star crust: Hashin-Shtrikman variational approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AAIGQZ3D

@misc{pith2026250712266,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining shear modulus of polycrystalline neutron star crust: Hashin-Shtrikman variational approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AAIGQZ3D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12266}
}
read the original abstract

The elastic properties of the neutron star crust are thought to play a crucial role in various phenomena of neutron stars (glitches, oscillations, gravitational wave emission) and should be described quantitatively to model these phenomena. The fundamental problem of this description is associated with the polycrystalline nature of the crust: similar to terrestrial materials, the elastic moduli, strictly speaking, depend on the shape and orientation of crystallites, but for the crust, they are unknown. As a result, some assumptions are generally required to predict the elastic properties or constrain their possible range. In this paper, we follow the commonly believed assumption that the crust is (locally) isotropic, which allows us to describe elastic properties by two (effective) parameters: bulk and shear moduli. The bulk modulus is well determined by the Voigt-Reuss bounds, and we constrain the shear modulus by applying, for the first time in astrophysics of compact stars, the variational Hashin-Shtrikman approach, based on the additional assumption that there are no correlations in the orientation of crystallites. We analyse the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds for the one-component crust taking into account the electron screening and the motion of the nuclei, and for two-component static crystals. In particular, we demonstrate that within applied assumptions the effective shear modulus should be lower than the Voigt estimate, typically applied in the astrophysical literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12266 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Effective shear modulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The effective shear modulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Similar to Fig. 2, but for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effective shear modulus sc2 of the crystal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tidal deformation and strain accumulation of solid compact stars

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Solid strangeon stars of 1.4 Msun differ by ~40% in tidal deformability from fluid counterparts and release up to 10^46 erg via central-peaking strain fracture at hundreds of Hz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Haensel, A

    P. Haensel, A. Potekhin, and D. Yakovlev, Neutron Stars 1: Equation of State and Structure , Astrophysics and Space Science Library (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Chamel and P

    N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Physics of Neutron Star Crusts, Liv. Rev. Relativ. 11, 10 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Ogata, S

    S. Ogata, S. Ichimaru, and H. M. van Horn, Thermonu- clear Reaction Rates for Dense Binary-Ionic Mixtures, Astrophys. J. 417, 265 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    M. D. Jones and D. M. Ceperley, Crystallization of the One-Component Plasma at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4572 (1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    A. Y. Potekhin and G. Chabrier, Equation of state of fully ionized electron-ion plasmas. II. Extension to rela- tivistic densities and to the solid phase, Phys. Rev. E 62, 8554 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0009261 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Medin and A

    Z. Medin and A. Cumming, Crystallization of classi- cal multicomponent plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 81, 036107 (2010), arXiv:1002.3327 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    M. E. Caplan and C. J. Horowitz, Colloquium: Astro- material science and nuclear pasta, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    M. E. Caplan, A. Cumming, D. K. Berry, C. J. Horowitz, and R. Mckinven, Polycrystalline Crusts in Ac- creting Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. 860, 148 (2018), arXiv:1804.06942 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    A. F. Fantina, S. De Ridder, N. Chamel, and F. Gul- minelli, Crystallization of the outer crust of a non- accreting neutron star, Astron. Astrophys. 633, A149 (2020), arXiv:1912.02849 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Carreau, F

    T. Carreau, F. Gulminelli, N. Chamel, A. F. Fantina, and J. M. Pearson, Crystallization of the inner crust of a neu- tron star and the influence of shell effects, Astron. Astro- phys. 635, A84 (2020), arXiv:1912.01265 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Arnold, J

    B. Arnold, J. Daligault, D. Saumon, A. B´ edard, and S. X. Hu, Crystal nucleation rates in one-component Yukawa systems, Phys. Rev. E 111, 025206 (2025), arXiv:2503.05902 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hamaguchi, R

    S. Hamaguchi, R. T. Farouki, and D. H. E. Dubin, Triple point of Yukawa systems, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4671 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    D. A. Baiko, Effect of the electron gas polarizability on the specific heat of phonons in Coulomb crystals, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056405 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    Kozhberov, Electrostatic energy and phonon proper- ties of Yukawa crystals, Phys

    A. Kozhberov, Electrostatic energy and phonon proper- ties of Yukawa crystals, Phys. Rev. E 98, 063205 (2018), arXiv:1901.04427 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    A. A. Kozhberov and A. Y. Potekhin, Electro- static energy of Coulomb crystals with polarized elec- tron background, Phys. Rev. E 103, 043205 (2021), arXiv:2104.09964 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Landau, E

    L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, A. Kosevich, and L. Pitaevskii, Theory of Elasticity , Course of theoretical physics (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1986)

    1986

  9. [17]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Hughto, Molecular Dynamics Sim- ulation of Shear Moduli for Coulomb Crystals, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:0812.2650 (2008), arXiv:0812.2650 [astro- ph]

    2008 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hoffman and J

    K. Hoffman and J. Heyl, Mechanical properties of non- accreting neutron star crusts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 2404 (2012), arXiv:1208.3258 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D. A. Baiko, Shear Modulus of a Coulomb Crystal of Ions: Effects of Ion Motion and Electron Background Polarization, Contributions to Plasma Physics 52, 157 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    D. A. Baiko, Screening corrections to the Coulomb crys- tal elastic moduli, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 3055 (2015), arXiv:1603.04227 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    A. A. Kozhberov, Elastic properties of Yukawa crystals, Physics of Plasmas 29, 043701 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0083168

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    via another approach (averaging of the shear wave velocity), which leads to the same result as Voigt’s as- sumption (Eq. 4). Within the Coulomb crystal approxi- mation, the Voigt estimate for the effective shear modu- lus can be calculated analytically, leading to a simple ex-...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Ogata and S

    S. Ogata and S. Ichimaru, First-principles calculations of shear moduli for Monte Carlo-simulated Coulomb solids, Phys. Rev. A 42, 4867 (1990)

    1990

  16. [24]

    Strohmayer, S

    T. Strohmayer, S. Ogata, H. Iyetomi, S. Ichimaru, and H. M. van Horn, The shear modulus of the neutron star crust and nonradial oscillations of neutron stars, Astro- phys. J. 375, 679 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    D. A. Baiko, Shear modulus of neutron star crust, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 22 (2011), arXiv:1104.0173 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Igarashi and H

    T. Igarashi and H. Iyetomi, Phase characteristics and elastic properties of binary Coulomb compounds, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 36, 6197 (2003)

    2003

  19. [27]

    A. A. Kozhberov, Elastic properties of binary crystals in neutron stars and white dwarfs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 4473 (2019), arXiv:1912.11395 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    D. A. Baiko, Liquid-phase epitaxy of neutron star crusts and white dwarf cores, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 528, 408 (2024), arXiv:2312.17544 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    D. A. Baiko, Elastic and breaking properties of epi- taxial face-centered crystals in neutron star crusts and white dwarf cores, Contributions to Plasma Physics 64, e202400004 (2024), arXiv:2403.11991 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. A. Morales and C. J. Horowitz, Anisotropic neu- tron star crust, solar system mountains, and grav- 11 itational waves, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044016 (2024), arXiv:2309.04855 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. A. Morales and C. J. Horowitz, Limiting Rotation Rate of Neutron Stars from Crust Breaking and Grav- itational Waves, Astrophys. J. Lett. 978, L8 (2025), arXiv:2410.19111 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Fuchs, A quantum mechanical calculation of the elas- tic constants of monovalent metals, Proc

    K. Fuchs, A quantum mechanical calculation of the elas- tic constants of monovalent metals, Proc. of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engi- neering Sciences 153, 622 (1936)

    1936

  25. [33]

    Voigt, Theoretische Studien uber die Elas- tizit¨ atsverhh¨ altnisse der Kristalle., Abh

    W. Voigt, Theoretische Studien uber die Elas- tizit¨ atsverhh¨ altnisse der Kristalle., Abh. Kgl. Ges. Wis. G¨ ottingen34, 1 (1887)

  26. [34]

    A. I. Chugunov, Neutron star crust in Voigt approxima- tion: general symmetry of the stress-strain tensor and an universal estimate for the effective shear modulus, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, L17 (2021), arXiv:2010.08398 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    A. I. Chugunov, Neutron star crust in Voigt approxima- tion II: general formula for electron screening correction for effective shear modulus, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 4607 (2022), arXiv:2207.14649 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. G. Yakovlev, Self-similarity relations for torsional os- cillations of neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 1148 (2023), arXiv:2210.02931 [astro-ph.SR]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A. A. Kozhberov and D. G. Yakovlev, Deformed crys- tals and torsional oscillations of neutron star crust, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 10.1093/mnras/staa2715 (2020), arXiv:2009.04952 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Passamonti and J

    A. Passamonti and J. A. Pons, Quasi-periodic oscillations in superfluid, relativistic magnetars with nuclear pasta phases, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463, 1173 (2016), arXiv:1606.02132 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kobyakov and C

    D. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, Elastic properties of polycrystalline dense matter, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449, L110 (2015), arXiv:1502.02461 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Reuss, Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mis- chkristallen auf Grund der Plastizit¨ atsbedingung f¨ ur Einkristalle ., Zeitschrift Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 9, 49 (1929)

    A. Reuss, Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mis- chkristallen auf Grund der Plastizit¨ atsbedingung f¨ ur Einkristalle ., Zeitschrift Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 9, 49 (1929)

    1929

  33. [41]

    Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate, Proceedings of the Physical Society A 65, 349 (1952)

    R. Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate, Proceedings of the Physical Society A 65, 349 (1952)

    1952

  34. [42]

    Kr¨ oner, Berechnung der elastischen Konstanten des Vielkristalls aus den Konstanten des Einkristalls, Zeitschrift fur Physik 151, 504 (1958)

    E. Kr¨ oner, Berechnung der elastischen Konstanten des Vielkristalls aus den Konstanten des Einkristalls, Zeitschrift fur Physik 151, 504 (1958)

    1958

  35. [43]

    J. D. Eshelby, Prog. Solid Mech. 2, 87 (1961)

    1961

  36. [44]

    deWit, Elastic constants and thermal expansion aver- ages of a nontextured polycrystal, Journal of mechanics of materials and structures 3, 195 (2008)

    R. deWit, Elastic constants and thermal expansion aver- ages of a nontextured polycrystal, Journal of mechanics of materials and structures 3, 195 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Y. Wu, M. Jia, X. Gou, and W. Xu, Average eshelby tensor of an arbitrarily shaped inclusion from convexity to non-convexity: Effective elastic properties of compos- ites, International Journal of Solids and Structures 269, 112183 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Hashin and S

    Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, On some variational princi- ples in anisotropic and nonhomogeneous elasticity, Jour- nal of Mechanics Physics of Solids 10, 335 (1962)

    1962

  39. [47]

    Hashin and S

    Z. Hashin and S. Shtrikman, A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of polycrystals, Jour- nal of Mechanics Physics of Solids 10, 343 (1962)

    1962

  40. [48]

    C. M. Kube and A. P. Arguelles, Bounds and self- consistent estimates of the elastic constants of polycrys- tals, Computers and Geosciences 95, 118 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    J. M. Brown, Determination of Hashin-Shtrikman bounds on the isotropic effective elastic moduli of poly- crystals of any symmetry, Computers and Geosciences 80, 95 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    D. C. Wallace, Thermoelasticity of Stressed Materials and Comparison of Various Elastic Constants, Physical Review 162, 776 (1967)

    1967

  43. [51]

    D. N. Blaschke, Averaging of elastic constants for poly- crystals, Journal of Applied Physics 122, 145110 (2017), arXiv:1706.07132 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Avellaneda and G

    M. Avellaneda and G. W. Milton, Optimal bounds on the effective bulk modulus of polycrystals, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 49, 824 (1989)

    1989

  45. [53]

    Kr¨ oner, Bounds for effective elastic moduli of disor- dered materials, Journal of Mechanics Physics of Solids 25, 137 (1977)

    E. Kr¨ oner, Bounds for effective elastic moduli of disor- dered materials, Journal of Mechanics Physics of Solids 25, 137 (1977)

    1977

  46. [54]

    Chamel, N

    N. Chamel, N. N. Shchechilin, and A. I. Chugunov, Pressure and chemical potentials in the inner crust of a cold neutron star within Hartree-Fock and extended Thomas-Fermi methods, Phys. Rev. C 111, 015805 (2025), arXiv:2501.08075 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    N. A. Zemlyakov and A. I. Chugunov, Neutron star in- ner crust: reduction of shear modulus by nuclei finite size effect, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 3813 (2023), arXiv:2209.05821 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    C.-J. Xia, T. Maruyama, N. Yasutake, T. Tatsumi, and Y.-X. Zhang, Elastic properties of nuclear pasta in a fully three-dimensional geometry, Physics Letters B 839, 137769 (2023), arXiv:2209.13310 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    J. D. Eshelby, The Determination of the Elastic Field of an Ellipsoidal Inclusion, and Related Problems, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 241, 376 (1957)

    1957

  50. [58]

    Jancovici, On the relativistic degenerate electron gas, Il Nuovo Cimento 25, 428 (1962)

    B. Jancovici, On the relativistic degenerate electron gas, Il Nuovo Cimento 25, 428 (1962)

    1962

  51. [59]

    V. E. Fortov, A. V. Ivlev, S. A. Khrapak, A. G. Khra- pak, and G. E. Morfill, Complex (dusty) plasmas: Cur- rent status, open issues, perspectives, Phys. Rep. 421, 1 (2005)

    2005

  52. [60]

    Donk´ o, G

    Z. Donk´ o, G. J. Kalman, and P. Hartmann, Dynamical correlations and collective excitations of Yukawa liquids, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 20, 413101 (2008), arXiv:0808.1963 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    B. A. Klumov, On melting criteria for complex plasma, Physics Uspekhi 53, 1053 (2010)

    2010

  54. [62]

    S. A. Khrapak, Thermodynamics of Yukawa systems and sound velocity in dusty plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 014022 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Khrapak and B

    S. Khrapak and B. Klumov, High-frequency elastic moduli of two-dimensional Yukawa fluids and solids, Physics of Plasmas 25, 033706 (2018), arXiv:1803.05295 [physics.plasm-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. Lu, D. Huang, and Y. Feng, Shear softening and hard- ening of a two-dimensional yukawa solid, Phys. Rev. E 105, 035203 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Beckers, J

    J. Beckers, J. Berndt, D. Block, M. Bonitz, P. J. Brugge- man, L. Couedel, G. L. Delzanno, Y. Feng, R. Gopalakr- ishnan, F. Greiner, P. Hartmann, M. Horanyi, H. Ker- sten, C. A. Knapek, U. Konopka, U. Kortshagen, E. G. Kostadinova, E. Kovacevic, S. I. Krasheninnikov, I. Mann, ...

    2023

  58. [66]

    Zhukhovitskii and E

    D. Zhukhovitskii and E. Perevoshchikov, Structural Transition in Strongly Coupled Coulomb Clusters, High Temperature 62, 421 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    A. M. Lipaev, V. N. Naumkin, S. A. Khrapak, A. D. Usachev, O. F. Petrov, M. H. Thoma, M. Kretschmer, C.-R. Du, O. D. Kononenko, and A. V. Zobnin, Wave dispersion in a three-dimensional complex plasma solid under microgravity conditions, Phys. Rev. E111, 015209 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    D. A. Baiko and A. I. Chugunov, Ab initio thermodynam- ics of one-component plasma for astrophysics of white dwarfs and neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.510, 2628 (2022), arXiv:2112.04822 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Chamel and A

    N. Chamel and A. F. Fantina, Binary and ternary ionic compounds in the outer crust of a cold nonaccreting neu- tron star, Phys. Rev. C 94, 065802 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    A. A. Kozhberov and D. A. Baiko, Physical Features of Binary Coulomb Crystals: Madelung Energy, Collec- tive Modes and Phonon Heat Capacity, Contributions to Plasma Physics 52, 153 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    E. E. Salpeter, Electrons Screening and Thermonuclear Reactions, Australian Journal of Physics 7, 373 (1954)

    1954

  64. [72]

    J. P. Hansen and P. Vieillefosse, Equation of state of the classical two-component plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 391 (1976)

    1976

  65. [73]

    P. H. Dederichs and R. Zeller, Variational treatment of the elastic constants of disordered materials, Zeitschrift fur Physik 259, 103 (1973)

    1973

  66. [74]

    Gairola and E

    B. Gairola and E. Kr¨ oner, A simple formula for calcu- lating the bounds and the self-consistent value of the shear modulus of a polycrystalline aggregate of cubic crystals, International Journal of Engineering Science19, 865 (1981)

    1981

  67. [75]

    C. M. Kube and M. de Jong, Elastic constants of poly- crystals with generally anisotropic crystals, Journal of Applied Physics 120, 165105 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    J. G. Berryman, Bounds and self-consistent estimates for elastic constants of random polycrystals with hexagonal, trigonal, and tetragonal symmetries, Journal of Mechan- ics Physics of Solids 53, 2141 (2005)

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.