REVIEW 3 cited by
Accelerating Community Detection by Using K-core Subgraphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Community detection is expensive, and the cost generally depends at least linearly on the number of vertices in the graph. We propose working with a reduced graph that has many fewer nodes but nonetheless captures key community structure. The K-core of a graph is the largest subgraph within which each node has at least K connections. We propose a framework that accelerates community detection by applying an expensive algorithm (modularity optimization, the Louvain method, spectral clustering, etc.) to the K-core and then using an inexpensive heuristic (such as local modularity maximization) to infer community labels for the remaining nodes. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can reduce the running time by more than 80% while preserving the quality of the solutions. Recent theoretical investigations provide support for using the K-core as a reduced representation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithm (LPA) for Community Detection on Large Graphs
Replacing per-vertex hash tables with 8-slot Misra-Gries sketches makes GPU label propagation use O(|V|) memory instead of O(|E|), cutting memory up to 98x with roughly 5% modularity loss.
-
$\nu$-LPA: Fast GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithm (LPA) for Community Detection
A GPU label propagation algorithm reaches 3B edges per second and claims large speedups over existing CPU and GPU community detection tools while producing slightly lower modularity.
-
Diffusion Models for Influence Maximization on Temporal Networks: A Guide to Make the Best Choice
A survey that groups diffusion models into five categories and proposes a flowchart for choosing among them in temporal-network influence maximization.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.