Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 28 references

Global bifurcation for steady viscous roll waves on an incline

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A global bifurcation theorem constructs a full curve of large-amplitude periodic roll waves from the Nusselt shear flow; the branch either blows up in one of a listed set of ways or returns to the shear flow.

desk verdict First global bifurcation result for free-boundary viscous roll waves, with a solid elliptic core and two statement-level gaps that should be fixed before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21142 v1 pith:ABALJVJI submitted 2026-07-23 math.AP

Daniel Abraham , Miles H. Wheeler This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035B3276D0576E17
keywords rollwavesfree-boundaryNavier–StokesglobalbifurcationOrr–Sommerfeldconformalmappingellipticsystemsinclinedflowtravelling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs steady, periodic, travelling “roll wave” solutions of the two-dimensional free-boundary Navier–Stokes equations for a viscous film flowing down an incline, subject only to gravity and possibly surface tension. Starting from the flat parallel Nusselt shear flow, the authors prove a local bifurcation curve of nontrivial waves whenever two natural conditions on the associated Orr–Sommerfeld operator hold. They then show this local curve extends to a global curve of solutions; along that curve, either a precise blow-up event occurs—surface self-intersection, corners, large curvature, unbounded velocity or stress, stagnation, or vanishing incline angle—or the curve returns to the original shear flow. They verify the hypotheses in two regimes, small wavenumber and low Reynolds number, matching the classic asymptotic neutral-stability curves. A sympathetic reader would care because this is the first global, large-amplitude construction for the full steady free-boundary viscous problem, where previously only perturbative or shallow-water results existed.

What carries the argument

The driving mechanism is the reformulation of the free-boundary problem as an elliptic system for (ψ, p, η) on a periodic strip, where η is the imaginary part of a conformal map flattening the fluid domain. For this system the verification of the algebraic covering (Shapiro–Lopatinsky) condition gives the uniform a priori estimate Proposition 5.2; the decisive boundary determinant is |det M''₁(ik)|² = 65536 k¹⁶ |∇η|⁻¹⁴ (σ²|∇η|² + 4|ψ_y|²), whose positivity is exactly what keeps the linearized operator semi-Fredholm. Because the linearization at the Nusselt solution has Fredholm index −1, the local construction uses a multiparameter analytic bifurcation theorem, and the global branch is obtai

What would settle it

Compute the boundary determinant |det M''₁(ik)|² along a numerically continued branch with σ = 0; if inf_T |ψ_y| approaches 0 while sup_T |∇η|, sup_T |D²η|, sup_R |∇ψ|, and sup_S |DV| remain bounded, then the a priori bound (5.3) is false and the global continuation proof collapses. Conversely, a direct numerical solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld system at the predicted low-Reynolds-number point should find a simple eigenvalue crossing; if instead the kernel is empty or two-dimensional, the hypotheses fail there.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central assertion, Theorem 1.4, is that a one-parameter local family of nontrivial periodic travelling-wave solutions bifurcating from the Nusselt profile at a parameter pair (θ*, γ*) can be continued as a continuous curve of solutions, real-analytic away from a discrete set, that is global. The continuation is unconditional except for an explicit dichotomy: as the curve parameter goes to infinity, the quantity measuring conformal-map degeneracy, second derivatives, velocity, stress, and—when surface tension is zero—the reciprocal surface-stagnation margin must blow up, or the curve closes by returning to the Nusselt solution. The key structural insight is to recast the problem, includin

Load-bearing premise

The whole continuation relies on the uniform estimate that, when surface tension is absent, the fluid velocity on the free surface never vanishes—if a sequence of solutions approached a surface stagnation point while all other controlled quantities stayed bounded, the linearized operator would cease to satisfy the covering condition and the branch could not be continued.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Roll waves exist at finite, not just infinitesimal, amplitude: the constructed branch contains solutions that leave any small neighbourhood of the Nusselt profile.
  • The only possible singular terminations of a branch are explicitly classified; for zero surface tension one of them is approach to surface stagnation, which is therefore the natural breaking mechanism in this model.
  • The bifurcation points predicted at small wavenumber (cot θ ≈ 4R/5, γ ≈ 2) and at low Reynolds number (θ = π/2, γ₀ = 1 + 1/(k² + cosh² k), σ = 0) give explicit, checkable parameter values at which large waves can be sought.
  • If the closed-loop alternative occurs, the theorem produces genuinely periodic solution loops in parameter space—an outcome not ruled out by the available arguments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, not pursued in the paper, is to determine numerically whether the global branches actually reach a blow-up alternative or close into loops; the blow-up list, especially the stagnation term, gives a precise diagnostic for such computations.
  • The same elliptic-system/conformal-map scaffolding may transfer to other free-boundary viscous settings—multilayer films, flows with Navier slip, or three-dimensional periodic waves—where a uniform covering condition would play the same role.
  • The small-wavenumber and low-Reynolds-number theorems identify bifurcation points but do not track the physical wavenumber along the branch; an extension would be to show the branch remains in a thin-film or Stokes regime, which the authors note need not happen.
  • Because surface tension removes the stagnation alternative but not the corner or curvature alternatives, adding surface tension could be the cleanest way to test whether stagnation is the only physically reachable blow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs global curves of nontrivial travelling periodic roll-wave solutions to the two-dimensional free-boundary incompressible Navier–Stokes equations on an inclined plane, bifurcating from the Nusselt shear flow. The main theorem (Theorem 1.1) gives local bifurcation under hypotheses on the Orr–Sommerfeld operator; Theorem 1.4 extends the local curve to a global curve via analytic global bifurcation, with a blow-up alternative or a closed loop. The authors reformulate the problem on a fixed strip via conformal maps, prove that the linearized operator is elliptic in the Agmon–Douglis–Nirenberg sense with a Shapiro–Lopatinsky condition, compute its Fredholm index, and reduce the bifurcation hypotheses to conditions on the Orr–Sommerfeld operator. They then verify these hypotheses in two regimes: small wavenumber (Theorem 1.5) and low Reynolds number (Theorem 1.6).

Significance. If the statement-level gaps identified below are fixed, this would be a substantial advance: it appears to be the first global large-amplitude construction for the steady free-boundary Navier–Stokes problem with only gravity as external force, and the first rigorous construction of laminar roll waves in this system. The technical work is impressive and mostly careful: the ADN elliptic-system framework is implemented in detail, the Shapiro–Lopatinsky determinant is computed explicitly in (3.12), the Fredholm index calculation in Proposition 3.2 is complete, and the uniform a priori estimates of Proposition 5.2 are the right backbone for the global continuation. The verification of the Orr–Sommerfeld hypotheses in the small-k and low-R regimes uses explicit, parameter-free asymptotic expansions and determinant computations, rather than numerical or fitted arguments. The paper also correctly identifies and handles the lack of reflection symmetry and the absence of a maximum principle. However, the current statement of the main theorems contains two load-bearing gaps: the exclusion of γ=1 is missing, and the small-wavenumber branch for R=0, σ>0 yields angles outside the range allowed b

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 1.1; Section 4.1, Eq. (4.1), (4.4)] The parameter set γ* ∈ (0,∞) \ {2} is not sufficient. The Orr–Sommerfeld operator in (4.1) and the embedding E in (4.4) contain the factor (Ψ'_0(1))^{-1} = (1-γ)^{-1}; for γ=1 the boundary terms (1.8b)–(1.8c) and the ODE for ζ in (4.4) are singular, so hypotheses (I)–(II) are not well-formed. Since Theorem 1.1 feeds into the global continuation Theorem 1.4 (and Theorems 6.1–6.2), the statement must exclude γ=1. The verified regimes avoid this: Theorem 1.5 has γ~(k)=2+O(k^2), and Theorem 1.6 has γ0(k)=1+(k^2+cosh^2 k)^{-1}>1. The fix is local—add the exclusion γ≠1 and a remark—but it is necessary for the main theorem as stated.
  2. [Theorem 1.5; Section 6.2, Eq. (6.11)] Theorem 1.5 asserts that for every R≥0 and all small k outside a countable set, θ*=θ~(k) and γ*=γ~(k) satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1, which requires θ* ∈ (0,π/2]. However, the expansion (6.11) gives cot θ~(k) = 4R/5 + k^2(-σ/2 - 7743R/2800 + 16R^3/1126125) + O(k^3). For R=0 and σ>0 this becomes cot θ~(k) = -σ k^2/2 + O(k^3), so θ~(k) > π/2 for all sufficiently small k≠0, violating the angle bound in Theorem 1.1. Thus Theorem 1.5 is false as stated in this case. Either Theorem 1.1 should be relaxed to allow θ* ∈ (0,π) (which the proof of Theorem 6.1 actually supports, since U uses θ∈(0,π)), or Theorem 1.5 should exclude R=0 when σ>0.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1.14) vs. Eq. (6.13)] The introduction's expansion (1.14) for the small-wavenumber kernel φ~(y;k) has O(k) term with nonzero imaginary part at y=1 (it equals ikR/15), contradicting the phase constraint Im φ(1)=0 in X_os. The rigorous expansion (6.13) is -1/60 ikR y^2(1-y)(2-y)^2, which vanishes at y=1. Please correct (1.14).
  2. [Section 6.2, proof of Lemma 6.4] In showing Γ_n is not identically zero for n≠1, the contradiction uses γ~(k)=2-2k^2+O(k^3) (so γ~(nk)≠γ~(k)). This second-order coefficient is not explicitly stated before the proof; please make it explicit for readability.
  3. [Theorem 1.6] The soft perturbation argument (Lemma A.2) gives analytic functions θ~(R), γ~(R) with θ~(0)=π/2, but it does not ensure θ~(R) ≤ π/2 for R>0. If Theorem 1.1 is relaxed to θ∈(0,π), this is moot; otherwise a sign check for the first-order correction is needed.
  4. [General] There are several typographical issues: 'BIFURCA TION' and 'W A VES' in the title, 'Thorem 1.4' in Section 1.5, and inconsistent notation 'inf_T |∇ψ|+σ' versus 'inf_T |ψ_y|+σ'. These do not affect the mathematics but should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: local bifurcation is conditional on explicit Orr–Sommerfeld assumptions, and the regime verifications are independent asymptotic/adjoint computations.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Theorem 1.1 is a conditional statement: under hypotheses (I) and (II) on the Orr–Sommerfeld operator, a local bifurcation curve exists. These hypotheses are not assumed to prove themselves; they are shown in Section 4 to be equivalent to kernel and transversality conditions on the linearized operator LQ via Lemma 4.1 and Lemma 4.3, with the transversality condition further reduced to a determinant condition through the explicit formal adjoint in Lemma 4.4 and Corollary 4.5. No fitted parameters are involved. The small-wavenumber verification (Section 6.2) uses a Crandall–Rabinowitz argument on an auxiliary map G and computes kernels of the OS operator and its adjoint via rigorous asymptotic expansions; the low-Reynolds-number verification (Section 6.3) solves the R=0 Stokes problem explicitly and verifies the determinant is nonzero. These are independent computations, not re-statements of the conclusion. The global continuation argument uses standard semi-Fredholm/global-bifurcation theory (Dancer, Buffoni–Toland, Hale), with the required ellipticity and Shapiro–Lopatinsky estimates proved in Proposition 3.1 and the a priori estimates in Proposition 5.2. The blow-up alternative includes stagnation as one possible failure; the paper does not assert stagnation cannot occur, so including 1/(inf_T |∇ψ|+σ) is not circular. Citations to prior work by one author (Haziot–Wheeler, Chen–Walsh–Wheeler) are for technique and standard global-bifurcation variants, and proofs or standard references are provided; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from those papers. A reviewer caveat about the excluded case γ*=1, where Ψ'_0(1)=0 makes the OS boundary terms singular, is a statement-level correctness concern, not a circularity: the verified regimes have γ away from 1, and the derivation chain does not reduce to an input. Overall, no prediction is equivalent by construction to its own hypothesis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters, invented entities, or ad hoc postulates. The central claim is conditional on Orr–Sommerfeld hypotheses in the general theorem; the two regime verifications use explicit asymptotic constructions. The axioms are either standard mathematical background or the stated physical model.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Agmon–Douglis–Nirenberg elliptic systems theory: Schauder and Sobolev estimates (Theorems B.1, B.2) for properly elliptic systems satisfying the Shapiro–Lopatinsky condition.
    Used in Proposition 3.1 to prove the linearized operator is semi-Fredholm and in Section 5 for a priori estimates; stated and applied as a black box.
  • standard math Hale's multiparameter bifurcation theorem and Buffoni–Toland analytic global bifurcation theorem (Theorems 2.2, 2.3), with proofs sketched in Appendix A.
    Provides the local curve and its global continuation; the paper supplies a proof of the adapted version.
  • standard math Darboux–Picard theorem for injectivity of C^1 conformal maps between a rectangle and the fluid domain (Lemma 2.1).
    Ensures the conformal reformulation (2.10) is equivalent to the free-boundary problem; cited from [Bur21].
  • standard math Classical elliptic regularity, maximum principle for harmonic functions, Lax–Milgram, Sobolev embedding, and Fredholm theory for ODE boundary-value problems.
    Used throughout Sections 3–6, e.g., in the index computation (3.16)–(3.18) and the ODE analyses in Section 6.
  • domain assumption The free-boundary Navier–Stokes model (1.2) with no-slip bed, surface tension, and travelling-wave reduction; the Nusselt shear solution (1.7) as the trivial branch.
    The entire theorem is within this physical model; the paper does not derive the model, and the Nusselt solution's uniqueness is computed in (1.4)–(1.5).
  • domain assumption The Orr–Sommerfeld operator (1.8) correctly describes the linearization of the nonlinear problem around the Nusselt solution; hypotheses (I)–(II) on its kernel and transversality are sufficient for bifurcation (Lemma 4.1).
    The reduction in Section 4 (composition (4.7) and Fredholm alternative Lemma 4.4) establishes this; the general theorem is conditional on these hypotheses, which are then verified in two regimes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global bifurcation for steady viscous roll waves on an incline." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABALJVJI

@misc{pith2026260721142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global bifurcation for steady viscous roll waves on an incline},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABALJVJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21142}
}
read the original abstract

We construct a branch of travelling periodic `roll wave' solutions to the free-boundary incompressible Navier--Stokes equations on an inclined plane in two dimensions. These solutions bifurcate from a parallel shear flow, under natural assumptions on the related Orr--Sommerfeld equation. Using techniques from analytic global bifurcation theory, we extend the local branch to a global curve of solutions. A key step of the proof is reformulating the problem, including the unknown free boundary, as an elliptic system in the sense of Agmon--Douglis--Nirenberg. Finally, we verify the hypotheses on the Orr--Sommerfeld equation for two regimes: small wavenumber and low Reynolds number.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21142 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A sample portion of the fluid domain. The equations on S are then given by a kinematic boundary condition, representing no penetration across the surface, V · ν = 0 on S, (1.2c) and a dynamic boundary condition, which represents the force balance on the surface, [(P + σH)I − µDV ] ν = 0 on S. (1.2d) We assume a standard no-slip condition on B, i.e. that the fluid velocity vanishes at the lower boundary in the lab fr… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. II

    [ADN64] S. Agmon, A. Douglis, and L. Nirenberg. “Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. II”.Comm. Pure Appl. Math.17 (1964), 35–92. [ANP85] S. V. Alekseenko, V. E. Nakoryakov, and B. G. Pokusaev. “Wave formation on vertical falling liquid films”.Int. J. Multiphase Flow11...

    1964

  2. [4]

    Global bifurcation of steady gravity water waves with critical layers

    arXiv:2603.21434. [CSV16] A. Constantin, W. Strauss, and E. V˘ arv˘ aruc˘ a. “Global bifurcation of steady gravity water waves with critical layers”.Acta Math.217.2 (2016), 195–262. [Cor34] V. Cornish.Ocean waves and kindred geophysical phenomena

    arXiv 2016

  3. [11]

    Traveling wave solutions to the free boundary incompressible Navier- Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions

    [KT24] J. Koganemaru and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solutions to the free boundary incompressible Navier- Stokes equations with Navier boundary conditions”.J. Differential Equations411 (2024), 381–

    2024

  4. [14]

    Large travelling capillary-gravity waves for Darcy flow

    arXiv:2601.11800. [Ngu26] H. Q. Nguyen. “Large travelling capillary-gravity waves for Darcy flow”.Nonlinearity39.3 (2026), Paper No. 035008,

    arXiv 2026

  5. [18]

    Accurate solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld stability equation

    1907, 69–138. [Ors71] S. A. Orszag. “Accurate solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld stability equation”.J. Fluid Mech.50 (1971), 689–703. [Pad13] M. Padula. “On stability of a capillary liquid down an inclined plane”.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S6.5 (2013), 1343–1353. [Rab71] P. H. Rabinowitz. “Some global results for nonlinear eigenvalue problems”.J. Funct...

    1907

  6. [22]

    Traveling wave solutions to the one-phase Muskat problem: existence and stability

    [NT24] H. Q. Nguyen and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solutions to the one-phase Muskat problem: existence and stability”.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.248.1 (2024), Paper No. 5,

    2024

  7. [23]

    Well-posedness of the traveling wave problem for the free boundary compressible Navier-Stokes equations

    arXiv:2502.11899. [ST23] N. Stevenson and I. Tice. “Well-posedness of the traveling wave problem for the free boundary compressible Navier-Stokes equations”

    arXiv

  8. [27]

    The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. part II: a viscous liquid

    1907, 9–68. [Orr07b] W. M. Orr. “The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. part II: a viscous liquid”.Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect. A. Vol

    1907

Show all 28 references
  1. [32]

    A new model of roll waves: comparison with Brock’s exper- iments

    [RG12] G. L. Richard and S. L. Gavrilyuk. “A new model of roll waves: comparison with Brock’s exper- iments”.J. Fluid Mech.698 (2012), 374–405. [RM00] C. Ruyer-Quil and P. Manneville. “Improved modeling of flows down inclined planes”.Eur. Phys. J. B15 (2000), 357–369. [RM98] C...

    2012

  2. [36]

    Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues

    Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2004, 1–28. [CR71] M. G. Crandall and P. H. Rabinowitz. “Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues”.J. Functional Analysis8 (1971), 321–340. [CM09] R. V. Craster and O. K. Matar. “Dynamics and stability of thin liquid films”.Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (3 2009), 1131–1...

    2004

  3. [39]

    On a pseudo-differential equation for Stokes waves

    [Tol02] J. F. Toland. “On a pseudo-differential equation for Stokes waves”.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 162.2 (2002), 179–189. [Tol96] J. F. Toland. “Stokes waves”.Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.7.1 (1996), 1–48. [TK78] J. Topper and T. Kawahara. “Approximate equations for long no...

    2002

  4. [49]

    Traveling water waves—the ebb and flow of two centuries

    [Haz+22] S. V. Haziot et al. “Traveling water waves—the ebb and flow of two centuries”.Quart. Appl. Math.80.2 (2022), 317–401. [HW22] V. M. Hur and M. H. Wheeler. “Overhanging and touching waves in constant vorticity flows”. J. Differential Equations338 (2022), 572–590. [Jef25...

    2022

  5. [58]

    Surface waves of viscous fluid down an inclined plane

    [Nin+92] H. Ninomiya et al. “Surface waves of viscous fluid down an inclined plane”.Developments in partial differential equations and applications to mathematical physics (Ferrara, 1991). 1992, 105–114. [NTW93] T. Nishida, Y. Teramoto, and H. A. Win. “Navier-Stokes flow down ...

    1991

  6. [75]

    On the evolution of roll waves

    [Kra92] C. Kranenburg. “On the evolution of roll waves”.J. Fluid Mech.245 (1992), 249–261. [Kra61] J. P. Krasovski ˘ ı. “On the theory of steady-state waves of finite amplitude”. ˇZ. Vyˇ cisl. Mat i Mat. Fiz.1 (1961), 836–855. [LT23] G. Leoni and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solut...

    1992

  7. [79]

    Traveling wave solutions to the multilayer free boundary incompress- ible Navier-Stokes equations

    [ST21] N. Stevenson and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solutions to the multilayer free boundary incompress- ible Navier-Stokes equations”.SIAM J. Math. Anal.53.6 (2021), 6370–6423. 46 REFERENCES [ST24] N. Stevenson and I. Tice. “Well-posedness of the stationary and slowly traveling...

    2021

  8. [85]

    Steady water waves

    [Str10] W. A. Strauss. “Steady water waves”.Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)47.4 (2010), 671–694. [Sun97] S. M. Sun. “On stability of liquid flow down an inclined plane”.Quart. Appl. Math.55.2 (1997), 375–397. [Ter92] Y. Teramoto. “On the Navier-Stokes flow down an inclined plane...

    2010

  9. [437]

    Traveling wave solutions to the inclined or periodic free boundary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

    [KT23] J. Koganemaru and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solutions to the inclined or periodic free boundary incompressible Navier-Stokes equations”.J. Funct. Anal.285.7 (2023), Paper No. 110057,

    2023

  10. [1934]

    Progressive waves in rivers

    [Cor07] V. Cornish. “Progressive waves in rivers”.Geog. J.29.1 (1907), 23–31. [Cra04] A. D. D. Craik. “The origins of water wave theory”.Annual review of fluid mechanics. Vol

    1907

  11. [1966]

    On the existence theory for irrotational water waves

    [KN78] G. Keady and J. Norbury. “On the existence theory for irrotational water waves”.Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.83.1 (1978), 137–157. [Kie12] H. Kielh¨ ofer.Bifurcation theory. Second. Vol

    1978

  12. [1981]

    Mathematical solution of the problem of roll-waves in inclined open channels

    [Dre49] R. F. Dressler. “Mathematical solution of the problem of roll-waves in inclined open channels”. Comm. Pure Appl. Math.2 (1949), 149–194. 44 REFERENCES [EEV12] M. Ehrnstr¨ om, J. Escher, and G. Villari. “Steady water waves with multiple critical layers: interior dynamic...

    1949

  13. [1995]

    Stability of liquid flow down an inclined plane

    [Yih63] C.-S. Yih. “Stability of liquid flow down an inclined plane”.Phys. Fluids6 (1963), 321–334. [Zad04] E. Zadrzy´ nska. “Free boundary problems for nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations”.Disserta- tiones Math. (Rozprawy Mat.)424 (2004), 1–135. [Zei95] E. Zeidler.Applied f...

    1963

  14. [2001]

    Free boundary problems for a viscous incompressible fluid

    [SS07] Y. Shibata and S. Shimizu. “Free boundary problems for a viscous incompressible fluid”. RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu B1 (2007), 356–358. [Shk67] V. Y. Shkadov. “Wave flow regimes of a thin layer of viscous fluid subject to gravity”.Fluid Dyn. 2 (1967), 29–34. [Som09] A. ...

    2007

  15. [2002]

    Existence and qualitative theory for stratified solitary water waves

    [CWW18] R. M. Chen, S. Walsh, and M. H. Wheeler. “Existence and qualitative theory for stratified solitary water waves”.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire35.2 (2018), 517–576. [CT26] J. H. Choi and I. Tice. “Traveling wave solutions to a general incompressible Nav...

    2018

  16. [2011]

    Large-amplitude steady gravity water waves with general vorticity and critical layers

    [WW24] E. Wahl´ en and J. Weber. “Large-amplitude steady gravity water waves with general vorticity and critical layers”.Duke Math. J.173.11 (2024), 2197–2258. [WRL95] J. T. Wloka, B. Rowley, and B. Lawruk.Boundary value problems for elliptic systems

    2024

  17. [2012]

    Wave flow of thin viscous liquid films

    [KK49] P. L. Kapitza and S. P. Kapitza. “Wave flow of thin viscous liquid films”.Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 19 (1949), 105–120. [Kat66] T. Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators. Vol. Band

    1949

  18. [2023]

    Periodic gravity-capillary roll wave solutions to the inclined viscous shallow water equations in two dimensions

    arXiv:2301.00773. [Ste25] N. Stevenson. “Periodic gravity-capillary roll wave solutions to the inclined viscous shallow water equations in two dimensions”.SIAM J. Math. Anal.57.2 (2025), 1342–1369. [ST26] N. Stevenson and I. Tice. “The traveling wave problem for the shallow wa...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [2025]

    Stationary wave solutions to two dimensional viscous shallow water equations: theory of small and large solutions

    arXiv:2505.24562. [ST25b] N. Stevenson and I. Tice. “Stationary wave solutions to two dimensional viscous shallow water equations: theory of small and large solutions”

    arXiv

  20. [2026]

    Stability of viscous St. Venant roll waves: from onset to infinite Froude number limit

    arXiv:2601.14085. [Bar+17] B. Barker et al. “Stability of viscous St. Venant roll waves: from onset to infinite Froude number limit”.J. Nonlinear Sci.27.1 (2017), 285–342. [Bea84] J. T. Beale. “Large-time regularity of viscous surface waves”.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.84.4 (198...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.