REVIEW 2 cited by
dm2gal: Mapping Dark Matter to Galaxies with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Maps of cosmic structure produced by galaxy surveys are one of the key tools for answering fundamental questions about the Universe. Accurate theoretical predictions for these quantities are needed to maximize the scientific return of these programs. Simulating the Universe by including gravity and hydrodynamics is one of the most powerful techniques to accomplish this; unfortunately, these simulations are very expensive computationally. Alternatively, gravity-only simulations are cheaper, but do not predict the locations and properties of galaxies in the cosmic web. In this work, we use convolutional neural networks to paint galaxy stellar masses on top of the dark matter field generated by gravity-only simulations. Stellar mass of galaxies are important for galaxy selection in surveys and thus an important quantity that needs to be predicted. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art benchmark model and allows the generation of fast and accurate models of the observed galaxy distribution.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks
Physics-informed generative U-Nets evolve and super-resolve fuzzy dark matter fields under Schrödinger–Poisson constraints with far less supervised data than pure data-driven baselines.
-
SPINN: Advancing Cosmological Simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter with Physics Informed Neural Networks
A physics-informed neural network (SPINN) solves the Schrödinger-Poisson equations for fuzzy dark matter collapse in 1D and 3D, matching a spectral solver on a sinusoidal test case.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.