Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Discriminating Power of Centrality Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1305.3146 v1 pith:ACIILC4D submitted 2013-05-14 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords centralitymeasuresverticesattemptcentralitiesconjecturedifferentestrada
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The calculation of centrality measures is common practice in the study of networks, as they attempt to quantify the importance of individual vertices, edges, or other components. Different centralities attempt to measure importance in different ways. In this paper, we examine a conjecture posed by E. Estrada regarding the ability of several measures to distinguish the vertices of networks. Estrada conjectured that if all vertices of a graph have the same subgraph centrality, then all vertices must also have the same degree, eigenvector, closeness, and betweenness centralities. We provide a counterexample for the latter two centrality measures and propose a revised conjecture.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools