Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLaRA: Large Language-Recommendation Assistant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.02445 v4 pith:AF4IFYDW submitted 2023-12-05 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords llmssequentialbehavioralhybriditemsknowledgelanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sequential recommendation aims to predict users' next interaction with items based on their past engagement sequence. Recently, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked interest in leveraging them for sequential recommendation, viewing it as language modeling. Previous studies represent items within LLMs' input prompts as either ID indices or textual metadata. However, these approaches often fail to either encapsulate comprehensive world knowledge or exhibit sufficient behavioral understanding. To combine the complementary strengths of conventional recommenders in capturing behavioral patterns of users and LLMs in encoding world knowledge about items, we introduce Large Language-Recommendation Assistant (LLaRA). Specifically, it uses a novel hybrid prompting method that integrates ID-based item embeddings learned by traditional recommendation models with textual item features. Treating the "sequential behaviors of users" as a distinct modality beyond texts, we employ a projector to align the traditional recommender's ID embeddings with the LLM's input space. Moreover, rather than directly exposing the hybrid prompt to LLMs, a curriculum learning strategy is adopted to gradually ramp up training complexity. Initially, we warm up the LLM using text-only prompts, which better suit its inherent language modeling ability. Subsequently, we progressively transition to the hybrid prompts, training the model to seamlessly incorporate the behavioral knowledge from the traditional sequential recommender into the LLM. Empirical results validate the effectiveness of our proposed framework. Codes are available at https://github.com/ljy0ustc/LLaRA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Not Just What, But When: Integrating Irregular Intervals to LLM for Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IntervalLLM integrates irregular time intervals into an LLM recommender via interval embeddings and interval-infused attention, improving next-item Hit Rate@1 on three benchmarks and adding a new interval-perspective ...

  2. LLM4MEA: Data-free Model Extraction Attacks on Sequential Recommenders via Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-driven agent generates synthetic interaction sequences that, when queried against a target sequential recommender, produce surrogate models with higher agreement to the target than random or autoregressive data...

  3. R4ec: A Reasoning, Reflection, and Refinement Framework for Recommendation Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    R4ec trains a small reflection model to critique and refine LLM-generated user and item knowledge, which then improves downstream recommendation accuracy.

Pith tools