Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 300 references

The Degree of Fine-Tuning Needed for a Viable Universe: Not Fragile?

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A viable universe is not fragile: most of the dozen key constants and cosmological parameters can shift by orders of magnitude and still produce galaxies, stars, planets, and complex nuclei.

desk verdict Useful synthesis that softens several classic stellar fine-tuning anecdotes with real stellar/BBN work, but the “not fragile” headline outruns the one- and two-parameter slices. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23374 v1 pith:AGBAZAWH submitted 2026-07-25 astro-ph.CO

Fred C. Adams This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords fine-tuningmultiversefundamentalconstantscosmologystellarevolutionnucleosynthesishabitability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review maps how far the laws of physics and cosmology can be changed before a universe fails to build long-lived complex structure. Roughly a dozen quantities—force strengths, light particle masses, and cosmological knobs such as the fluctuation amplitude, baryon-to-photon ratio, and vacuum energy—control whether galaxies, stars, planets, and heavy nuclei can form. Across that set the windows that still work are typically wide, often spanning several orders of magnitude. Classic stellar “fine-tuning” cases (the triple-alpha resonance, stable diprotons, unbound deuterium) do not shut down stars or nucleosynthesis as tightly as often claimed; alternate nuclear paths and self-regulating stellar structure keep energy generation and element production alive. Hierarchy problems, especially the tiny vacuum energy relative to the Planck scale, remain, but the small-tolerance sense of fine-tuning is weaker than the fragile-universe picture suggests.

What carries the argument

One- and two-parameter slices through the space of force couplings (α, α_G, α_s, α_w), light particle masses (m_u, m_d, m_e/β), and cosmological parameters (Ω, ρ_Λ/λ, η, δ, Q, D), constrained by BBN proton retention, long cosmic lifetime, galaxy formation and cooling, stellar structure solutions with adequate lifetime and surface temperature, planetary mass scales, and nuclear/atomic stability.

What would settle it

Show that simultaneous multi-parameter variations open large failure regions that one- and two-parameter slices miss, or that realistic chemistry and planetary climate require windows much narrower than the stellar and galactic bounds derived here.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When habitability is defined as the capacity to produce long-lived galaxies, stars, planets, and complex nuclei, the allowed ranges for the dominant coupling constants, light quark and electron masses, and key cosmological parameters are typically orders of magnitude wide. Several textbook stellar fine-tuning arguments fail to render stars non-viable once full stellar structure and alternate nucleosynthesis channels are included, so a working universe is “not fragile” in the narrow-tolerance sense—while vacuum energy remains hierarchically small compared with the Planck scale.

Load-bearing premise

Habitability is treated as the production of long-lived complex structures plus crude thresholds such as billion-year timescales and rocky planets with atmospheres; if life needs far narrower chemistry or environment, the wide astrophysical windows do not prove low fine-tuning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Classic claims that stable diprotons or unbound deuterium kill stars are overstated; stars can still live for Gyr–Tyr and make heavy elements by alternate paths.
  • The triple-alpha resonance can shift by hundreds of keV and still yield net carbon, or beryllium-8 can bind and remove the need for the resonance altogether.
  • Vacuum energy can be many orders of magnitude larger than observed if Q and η also vary, yet must stay far below the Planck scale.
  • Universes without a weak force, or with Q up to ~10^{-2}, can still form stars and potentially habitable planets over substantial fractions of galactic real estate.
  • Assessing true odds still requires unknown prior distributions over the parameters; range width alone does not fix the probability of a working universe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If log-uniform priors are more natural than flat ones for dimensionful parameters, the effective fine-tuning of quark masses and vacuum energy drops sharply relative to flat-prior estimates.
  • The review’s emphasis on alternate nucleosynthesis channels suggests habitability maps may be even broader once three-or-more-parameter correlations and non-Standard-Model force laws are systematically explored.
  • Hierarchy problems (especially Λ) remain the sharpest residual tuning issues once small-tolerance fragility is relaxed, pointing future work toward dynamical mechanisms rather than anthropic range arguments alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This is a review (commissioned for an FQXi collection) surveying the allowed ranges of roughly a dozen fundamental constants and cosmological parameters (α, α_G, α_s, α_w, m_u, m_d, β, Ω, ρ_Λ, η, δ, Q, D) consistent with a "viable" universe — one that produces long-lived galaxies, stars, planets, and complex nuclei. Section by section it compiles constraints from BBN, structure formation, galactic cooling, stellar structure, the triple-alpha resonance, diproton and deuterium scenarios, the weak force, planetary mass scales, nuclear stability, quark masses, and spacetime dimensionality. Its central conclusions are: (i) most individual parameters admit windows spanning several orders of magnitude, so the universe is "not fragile" in the small-tolerance sense; (ii) several classic stellar fine-tuning cases (triple-alpha, stable diprotons, unstable deuterium) are far less restrictive than commonly claimed, based largely on the author's prior numerical stellar-evolution work; (iii) hierarchy-type tuning (especially the vacuum energy vs. the Planck scale) survives; and (iv) no probabilistic assessment is possible because the underlying priors are unknown (Appendix A).

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful and timely consolidation of the quantitative case that astrophysical viability is broadly tolerant: most of the ~12 parameters surveyed admit windows of several orders of magnitude, and several canonical fine-tuning exemplars (Hoyle resonance, diproton stability, deuterium instability) are shown to be less constraining than the textbook narrative suggests. Concrete strengths worth crediting: the triple-alpha bounds come from actual IMF-weighted MESA stellar-evolution grids rather than order-of-magnitude rescaling (Fig. 9); the diproton and unstable-deuterium stellar models are full stellar-structure solutions with explicit cross-section modifications (Figs. 10–11); the BBN constraints use a published, reproducible code (Fig. 4); and the 92 keV vs. ~500 keV comparison in §9 is a clean, falsifiable internal benchmark. The author is also commendably explicit that probability distributions over parameters are unknown and that the "not fragile" conclusion is therefore restricted to the small-tolerance sense, with hierarchy problems (vacuum energy) explicitly conceded. The paper does not ship machine-checked proofs or a joint-volume estimate, and its

major comments (2)
  1. [§18 (Summary), with §5/Fig. 5 and §4/Fig. 4] The headline tolerance for the vacuum energy density (rho_Lambda up to ~10^10-10^11 times observed, Eq. 22 and Fig. 5) is attained only at a corner of parameter space: Q pushed to ~10^-2, which is simultaneously the black-hole-overproduction ceiling of Eq. (25), and eta increased by ~10^3, near the edge of the BBN proton-retention map (Fig. 4, where the proton fraction is already down to ~10%). Similarly, the BBN 'wide range' (G up by 10^6, eta up by 10^4) is read off the upper-right corner of Fig. 4. These widest windows are therefore edge lengths of a joint viable region, not independent per-parameter tolerances, and wide marginals are logically compatible with a small joint viable volume (e.g., a thin diagonal band in (Q, rho_Lambda, eta) space). The manuscript is aware of the issue (Section 2 notes correlated variations; Appendix A's final paragraph defers the joint-distribution prob
  2. [§8, §10, §11, §14 (Figs. 8, 10, 11, 14)] The tolerance claims of different sections rest on mutually exclusive slices: the +/-100x range for alpha in §8 (Fig. 8) and the alpha-beta plane of §14 (Fig. 14) are computed with nuclear cross sections and reaction rates held fixed, whereas the diproton (§10, Fig. 10) and deuterium (§11, Fig. 11) results vary the cross sections with alpha and alpha_G fixed, and the quark-mass constraints of §15 (Fig. 16) vary m_u, m_d with everything else fixed. In a physically primary parameterization (alpha, alpha_s, m_q, alpha_G), the Coulomb-barrier sensitivity of Fig. 8 and the cross-section sensitivity of Figs. 10-11 are driven by the same underlying nuclear parameters, so these slices cannot be simultaneously realized. The paper would be substantially strengthened by (i) an explicit statement, in each figure caption or accompanying text, of which underlying parameters are held fixed, and (ii) a
minor comments (7)
  1. [§9] §9: the 'one in four chance of being sufficiently near a resonance' (comparing the 800 keV window to the ~3 MeV level spacing) is an implicit flat-measure statement of exactly the kind Appendix A warns against. It would be more consistent to present the 800 keV window as the result and note that any probability statement requires a prior on resonance placement.
  2. [§§8, 13 (Eq. 51)] The habitability proxies (~1 Gyr minimum timescale scaled as alpha^-2, the epsilon ~ 0.001 chemistry fraction in Eq. 51, the Earth-like planet mass range in §13) are acknowledged as uncertain, but the caveats are scattered. A single consolidated discussion of how the headline windows scale with these proxy choices would help the reader assess robustness.
  3. [throughout] A significant fraction of the load-bearing numerical inputs (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11) come from the author's own prior calculations. For a review this is acceptable, but the text should more clearly flag which results have independent corroboration (e.g., the MESA-based triple-alpha yields of [164] vs. the semi-analytic stellar-structure bounds) and which rest on a single research line.
  4. [Appendix A] Appendix A: in the quark-mass example the lower cutoff of the prior is written as 'm_1 = 1 eV', but m_1 is already defined as the lower edge of the target range; this should read m_min.
  5. [throughout] The manuscript contains an unusually large number of typographical errors (a non-exhaustive list: 'nontrival', 'developement', 'parmaeter', 'geoemtry', 'obsereved', 'mangtiude', 'proprotional', 'exhancement', 'digram', 'furnances', 'obivate', 'expolosive', 'adundance', 'acccretion', 'disucssion', 'concensus', 'contrained', 'mechnaism', 'manuccript', 'unvierse', 'probabiltiy'; section heading 'Galaxies and their Propertiess'). A full proofread is needed before publication.
  6. [Figs. 8, 11, 1-3, 7, 13] Figure 8's in-figure labels are garbled in the present version (e.g., 'sPaOO JaOa[LHs Qot HQoXJK tLPH'); Figure 11's legend renders the decay width as '°(d)' rather than Gamma(d). Figs. 1, 2, 3, 7, and 13 are AI-generated placeholders; the text promises artist replacements, which should be confirmed at proof stage.
  7. [§3, §12, §13] Eq. (5): the vacuum component presumably reads rho_Lambda0 a^{-3(1+w)}; please check the exponent formatting. Eq. (47): the derivation of the neutrino optical-depth bound is very compressed; one intermediate line connecting to standard stellar-structure scalings would help. §13: the claim of 'more than 6000 planets' detected needs a citation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Heavy self-citation of the author's prior stellar/BBN/structure calculations underpins many quoted ranges, but those results solve independent structure equations against external benchmarks rather than redefine the targets by construction.

  1. self citation load bearing [§§5, 8, 10–11 and Summary; citations [2],[3],[4],[6],[8],[9],[10]]
    "Using the modifications for nuclear reactions outlined above, one can solve the equations of stellar structure [70, 188, 235], using either a semi-analytic approach [2, 3, 31] or state-of-the-art computational modules [229, 230]. One example is shown by the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram of Figure 10 (from [4], see also [10])... Bottom line: In universes with stable diprotons, stars can live for trillions of years."

    Several of the review's most distinctive 'not fragile' windows (diproton main sequence lasting Gyr–Tyr, unstable-deuterium CNO/triple-nucleon channels, wide α–α_G stellar existence region, and the loosest ρ_Λ bounds when Q and η co-vary) are justified primarily by citing the author's own prior numerical papers rather than re-deriving them here. This is load-bearing self-citation for the synthesis claim. It is not circular in the strong sense: those priors solve the ordinary stellar-structure/BBN equations with modified constants and remain externally falsifiable; no target observable is being redefined as its own input.

full rationale

This is a career-spanning review whose central claim—that roughly a dozen couplings, masses, and cosmological parameters typically admit orders-of-magnitude windows for long-lived galaxies, stars, planets, and complex nuclei—is assembled from solving the standard equations of stellar structure, BBN, and structure formation with varied inputs. Those calculations are externally specified (MESA, known BBN networks, Friedmann/growth equations, semi-empirical mass formula, etc.) and are checked against ordinary astrophysical benchmarks; they are not self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction tricks, uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors, or renamed empirical patterns. Appendix A explicitly refuses to convert the ranges into a joint viable probability without unknown priors. The only circularity-adjacent feature is load-bearing dependence on the author's earlier numerical papers for several headline windows (diproton/deuterium main sequences, combined Λ–Q–η bounds, α–α_G stellar grids). That is normal review practice and does not reduce the claimed ranges to their inputs by construction, so the score stays at 2 rather than 0 only to register that dependence. Joint-volume vs marginal-slice concerns raised by critics are overclaim/correctness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central “not fragile” reading rests on (i) a multiverse/parameter-variation premise, (ii) a structure-based proxy for habitability, (iii) mostly independent one- and two-parameter scans inside Standard-Model-like physics, and (iv) numerous order-of-magnitude thresholds chosen as benchmarks rather than derived from a theory of life. No new particles are introduced; the landscape/multiverse is an adopted setting. Free parameters are the numerical cutoffs and proxy definitions that set the edges of “viable.”

free parameters (6)
  • Minimum habitability timescale (~1 Gyr, scaled with α for atomic times) = ~1 Gyr benchmark
    Used repeatedly to cut stellar lifetime and negative-Λ cosmic lifetime regions (§§5, 8, 18); not derived from a first-principles biology model.
  • Q viability window edges (Q_min ~ 6e-7, Q_max ~ 1e-2) = approx. 6e-7 to 1e-2
    Cooling, metal retention, planetary scattering, radiation, and black-hole overproduction bounds are assembled into a working interval (§6); edges depend on chosen survival-fraction and galaxy-mass assumptions.
  • Habitable planet mass/atmosphere chemistry fraction ε ~ 0.001 = ε ≈ 0.001
    Converts atomic energy scales into “chemistry temperature” and atmospheric retention mass (§13); order-of-magnitude choice.
  • Triple-alpha allowed ΔE_R window (~ -300 to +500 keV) = ~800 keV span
    Taken from stellar yield compilations for a limited massive-star mass range and IMF weighting (§9); depends on what carbon fraction counts as success.
  • Diproton cross-section enhancement factor X (~1e15–1e18) = X ~ 10^15 used in Fig. 10
    Controls the alternate main sequence (§10); motivated by analogy to deuterium burning but not a measured constant of another universe.
  • Dark-matter to baryon ratio band δ/η ~ 1–300 = 1 to ~300
    Suggested range for disk stability/star formation similar to ours (§7); acknowledged as not a sharp habitability limit.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Laws keep Standard-Model-like form; only constants/parameters vary across universes.
    Stated in §2 as the tractable approach versus rewriting all of physical law.
  • domain assumption A universe is “viable/habitable” if it can form long-lived complex structures: nuclei, planets, stars, galaxies.
    Introduction explicitly adopts this proxy in the absence of a theory of life.
  • domain assumption Inflation or a replacement can solve flatness/horizon issues so long-lived Ω≈1 universes are dynamically attainable.
    §3 treats flatness as required for longevity and inflation as the leading mechanism, while noting model dependence.
  • domain assumption Observer selection / anthropic reasoning is optional commentary; primary task is mapping astrophysical windows.
    §17 reviews anthropic arguments but the quantitative core is constraint delineation, not a specific anthropic probability measure.
  • standard math Unknown selection priors prevent converting allowed ranges into probabilities of habitability.
    Appendix A states the measure problem clearly; used to bound what the review can claim.
  • ad hoc to paper Order-of-magnitude nuclear/stellar/cosmological estimates suffice to locate failure boundaries even when coefficients are O(1) uncertain.
    Throughout §§4–15 many limits are scaling arguments; adequate for decades-wide windows, weaker for percent-level claims (e.g. quark masses).
invented entities (2)
  • Multiverse / string-landscape ensemble of vacuum realizations
    purpose: Motivates why constants might take different values in different regions and frames the review’s parameter survey.
    Introduced as a controversial premise (§1, Figs. 1–2), not derived here; review’s constraint maps still function as a thought experiment without realized other universes.
  • Galactic Habitable Zone for high-Q dense galaxies
    purpose: Argues that denser galaxies can still host large numbers of temperate planets in intermediate annuli (§6, Fig. 7).
    Phenomenological zone defined from radiation/scattering balance in prior Adams et al. work; useful organizing picture but not a new fundamental entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Degree of Fine-Tuning Needed for a Viable Universe: Not Fragile?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGBAZAWH

@misc{pith2026260723374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Degree of Fine-Tuning Needed for a Viable Universe: Not Fragile?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGBAZAWH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23374}
}
abstract

(abridged) In order for the universe to develop astrophysical structures and support life, the fundamental constants that determine the laws of physics and the cosmological parameters that specify cosmic properties must fall within a range of values. The goal of this review is to delineate these ranges. We start with the premise that multiple universes can exist and can sample different realizations of the laws of physics. This treatment focuses on the coupling constants that determine the strength of the fundamental forces $(\alpha,\alpha_G,\alpha_{\rm s},\alpha_{\rm w})$ and the masses of the particles $(m_u,m_d,m_e)$ that make up atomic matter. We also consider cosmological parameters, including the energy density parameter $\Omega$, the dark energy density $\rho_v$, the baryon-to-photon ratio $\eta$, the dark matter contribution $\delta$, the amplitude $Q$ of primordial density fluctuations, and the number ${\cal D}$ of spatial dimensions. These quantities are constrained by the need for the universe to emerge from its epoch of nucleosynthesis with an acceptable chemical composition, live for a long time, and ultimately produce galaxies, stars, and planets. Stellar lifetimes must be long enough and surface temperatures must be high enough to support life. These requirements place constraints on the fundamental constants and cosmological parameters. This overview discusses several classic instances of possible fine-tuning in stars, including the triple alpha reaction, stable diprotons, and unstable deuterium. Finally, we note that for universes with significantly different parameters, a variety of astrophysical processes can generate energy, drive nucleosynthesis, and potentially support habitability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23374 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagramatic representation of a small portion of the multiverse. Within the larger ensemble, each individual universe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Diagramatic representation of the landscape of possible vacuum states of the universe. As the universe evolves from its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The universe has at least a dozen parameters that determine its ability to live for a long time, and form complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Remaining hydrogen (proton) mass fractions after Big Bang Nucleosynthesis for varying gravitational constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Constraints on the vacuum energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fraction of galactic real estate that remains habitable as a function of the amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Galactic Habitable Zone. In universes with moderately large [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Allowed region in the α-αG plane for the existence of stars (adapated from [3]). Solutions to the stellar structure equations exist only for the region of parameter space below the black curve. The red curve delineates the regime where the main sequence lifetimes are l…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Yields of alpha elements (composed of multiple helium nuclei) from nucleosynthesis in massive stars as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: H-R Diagram comparing the main sequence for standard hydrogen burning (blue curve on the left) and that for universes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: H-R Diagram for stars in universes without stable deuterium (adapated from [8]). Dashed curves (left side of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Allowed region for Habitable Planets in the plane of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Planets provide the most likely environments for life to develop. The constraints on the fundamental constants required [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Allowed region of parameter space in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Allowed region of parameter space in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_15.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: In order for nuclei to remain stable, the strong coupling constant must lie above the green curve. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Allowed masses for the light quarks (mu, md). For large departures of the quark masses from their observed values, constituent quarks decay inside hadrons (beyond the green curves). For more modest departures (beyond the blue curves), protons and neutrons could decay …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    E. A. Abbott,Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions, Seeley (1884)

  2. [2]

    F. C. Adams,Stars in other Universes: Stellar structure with different fundamental constants,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.08(2008) 010

    2008

  3. [3]

    F. C. Adams,Constraints on Alternate Universes: Stars and habitable planets with different fundamental con- stants,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.02(2016) 042

    2016

  4. [4]

    F. C. Adams,The Degree of Fine-Tuning in our Universe – and Others,Phys. Rep.807(2019) 1

    2019

  5. [5]

    F. C. Adams,Possible Solution to the Triple-Alpha Fine-Tuning Problem: Spallation reactions during planet formation,Astropart. Phys.141(2022) 102731

    2022

  6. [6]

    F. C. Adams, K. R. Coppess, and A. M. Bloch,Planets in other Universes: Habitability constraints on density fluctuations and galactic structure,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.09(2015) 030

    2015

  7. [7]

    F. C. Adams and E. Grohs,Stellar Helium Burning in Other Universes: A solution to the triple-alpha fine-tuning problem,Astropart. Phys.87(2017) 40

    2017

  8. [8]

    F. C. Adams and E. Grohs,On the Habitability of Universes without Stable Deuterium,Astropart. Phys.91 (2017) 90

    2017

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    F. C. Adams, S. Alexander, E. Grohs, and L. Mersini-Houghton,Constraints on Vacuum Energy from Structure Formation and Nucleosynthesis,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.03(2017) 021

    2017

  2. [10]

    F. C. Adams, A. R. Howe, E. Grohs, and G. M. Fuller,Effects of Bound Diprotons and Enhanced Nuclear Reaction Rates on Stellar Evolution,Astropart. Phys.130(2021) 102584

    2021

  3. [11]

    P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, et al., Planck Collaboration,Planck 2013 Results. XVI: Cosmo- logical Parameters,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) 16 65

    2013

  4. [12]

    P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, et al., Planck Collaboration,Planck 2015 Results. XX: Con- straints on Inflation,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) 20

    2015

  5. [13]

    Aghanim, Y

    N. Aghanim, Y . Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al., Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2018) 6

    2018

  6. [14]

    Agrawal, S

    V . Agrawal, S. M. Barr, J. F. Donoghue, and D. Sekel,Anthropic Considerations in Multiple-Domain Theories and the Scale of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 1822

    1998

  7. [15]

    Agrawal, S

    V . Agrawal, S. M. Barr, J. F. Donoghue, and D. Sekel,Viable Range of the Mass Scale of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev.D57(1998) 5480

    1998

  8. [16]

    Aguirre,Cold Big-Bang Cosmology as a Counterexample to Several Anthropic Arguments,Phys

    A. Aguirre,Cold Big-Bang Cosmology as a Counterexample to Several Anthropic Arguments,Phys. Rev.D64 (2001) 3508

    2001

  9. [17]

    Aguirre,Making Predictions in a Multiverse: Conundrums, dangers, coincidences, inUniverse or Multi- verse, ed

    A. Aguirre,Making Predictions in a Multiverse: Conundrums, dangers, coincidences, inUniverse or Multi- verse, ed. B. Carr,Cambridge University Press(2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    Aguirre and M

    A. Aguirre and M. Tegmark,Multiple Universes, Cosmic Coincidences, and other Dark Matters,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.01(2005) 003

    2005

  11. [19]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

    1982

  12. [20]

    Andrew and J

    K. Andrew and J. Supplee,A Hydrogenic Atom in d-Dimensions,Amer. J. Physics58(1990) 1177

    1990

  13. [21]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V . Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt,Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cos- mological Constant and Late-Time Cosmic Acceleration,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 4438

    2000

  14. [22]

    P. J. Armitage,Astrophysics of Planet Formation, Cambridge Univ. Press (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Baer, K.-Y

    H. Baer, K.-Y . Choi, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski,Dark Matter Production in the Early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm,Phys. Reports555(2015) 1

    2015

  16. [24]

    Y . V . Balashov,Resource Letter AP-1: The anthropic principle,Amer. J. Phys.59(1991) 1069

    1991

  17. [25]

    Banks,TCP , Quantum Gravity, the Cosmological Constant and all that

    T. Banks,TCP , Quantum Gravity, the Cosmological Constant and all that . . .,Nuc. Phys.B249(1985) 332

    1985

  18. [26]

    Banks,The Top10 500 Reasons Not to Believe in the Landscape, arXiv:1208.5715 (2012)

    T. Banks,The Top10 500 Reasons Not to Believe in the Landscape, arXiv:1208.5715 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Banks, M

    T. Banks, M. Dine, and E. Gorbatov,Is There a String Theory Landscape?J. High Energy Phys.08(2004) 58

    2004

  20. [28]

    J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, and G. Efstathiou,Cosmic Fluctuation Spectra with Large-Scale Power,Astrophys. J.321(1987) 28

    1987

  21. [29]

    J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner,Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale-free Density Pertur- bations in an Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev.D28(1983) 679

    1983

  22. [30]

    L. A. Barnes,The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life,Pub. Astron. Soc. Australia29(2012) 529

    2012

  23. [31]

    L. A. Barnes,Binding the Diproton in Stars: Anthropic Limits on the Strength of Gravity,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.12(2015) 050

    2015

  24. [32]

    L. A. Barnes and G. F. Lewis,Producing the Deuteron in Stars: Anthropic limits on fundamental constants,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.07(2017) 036 66

    2017

  25. [33]

    S. M. Barr and A. Khan,Anthropic Tuning of the Weak Scale and of m u/md in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models, Phys. Rev.D76(2007) 5002

    2007

  26. [34]

    J. D. Barrow,The Lore of Large Numbers – Some Historical Background to the Anthropic Principle,Quart. J. R. Astron. Soc.22(1981) 388

    1981

  27. [35]

    J. D. Barrow,Dimensionality,Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London310(1983) 337

    1983

  28. [36]

    J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler,The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford Univ. Press (1986)

    1986

  29. [37]

    J. D. Barrow, H. B. Sandvik, and J. Magueijo,Anthropic Reasons for Nonzero Flatness andΛ,Phys. Rev.D65 (2002) 123501

    2002

  30. [38]

    Basdevant, J

    J.-L. Basdevant, J. Rich, and M. Spiro,Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics from Nuclear Structure to Cosmology, Springer (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Baumann,TASI Lectures on Inflation, arXiv:0907.5424 (2009)

    D. Baumann,TASI Lectures on Inflation, arXiv:0907.5424 (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. R. Beane and M. J. Savage,The Quark-mass Dependence of Two-nucleon Systems,Nuc. Phys.A717(2003) 91

    2003

  33. [41]

    P. F. Bedaque, T. Luu, and L. Platter,Quark Mass Variation Constraints from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev.C83(2011) 045803

    2011

  34. [42]

    Bena and M

    I. Bena and M. Gra ˜na,String Cosmology and the Landscape,Comp. Ren. Physique18(2017) 200

    2017

  35. [43]

    A. J. Benson,Galaxy Formation Theory,Phys. Reports495(2010) 33

    2010

  36. [44]

    J. C. Berengut, E. Epelbaum, V . V . Flambaum, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nebreda, and J. R. Peláez,Varying the Light Quark Mass: Impact on the Nuclear Force and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev.D87(2013) 5018

    2013

  37. [45]

    E. A. Bergin, G. A. Blake, F. Ciesla, M. M. Hirschmann, and J. Li,Tracing the Ingredients for a Habitable Earth from Interstellar Space through Planet Formation,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.112(2015) 8965

    2015

  38. [46]

    Binder and G.F.R

    P.-M. Binder and G.F.R. Ellis,Nature, Computation and Complexity,Physica Scripta91(2016) 064004

    2016

  39. [47]

    G. R. Blumenthal, A. Dekel, and J. R. Primack,Very Large Scale Structure in an Open Cosmology of Cold Dark Matter and Baryons,Astrophys. J.326(1988) 539

    1988

  40. [48]

    Borstnik and H

    M. Borstnik and H. B. Nielsen,Why Nature has Made a Choice of One Time and Three Space Coordinates?J. Phys.A35(2002) 10563

    2002

  41. [49]

    Bostrom,Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy, Routledge (2002)

    N. Bostrom,Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy, Routledge (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    Bousso,The Cosmological Constant,Gen

    R. Bousso,The Cosmological Constant,Gen. Rel. Gravitation40(2008) 607

    2008

  43. [51]

    Bousso and L

    R. Bousso and L. J. Hall,Why Comparable? A Multiverse Explanation of the Dark Matter-Baryon Coincidence, Phys. Rev.D88(2013) 3503

    2013

  44. [52]

    Bousso, L

    R. Bousso, L. J. Hall, and Y . Nomura,Multiverse Understanding of Cosmological Coincidences,Phys. Rev.D 80(2009) 3510

    2009

  45. [53]

    Bousso and J

    R. Bousso and J. Polchinski,Quantization of Four-Form Fluxes and Dynamical Neutralization of the Cosmo- logical Constant,J. High Energy Phys.6(2000) 006 67

    2000

  46. [54]

    Bradford,The Effect of Hypothetical Diproton Stability on the Universe,J

    R.A.W. Bradford,The Effect of Hypothetical Diproton Stability on the Universe,J. Astrophys. Astron.30 (2009) 119

    2009

  47. [55]

    R. H. Brandenberger,Alternatives to the Inflationary Paradigm of Structure Formation,Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. 1(2011) 67

    2011

  48. [56]

    Bureš and P

    M. Bureš and P. Siegl,Hydrogen Atom in Space with a Compactified Extra Dimension and Potential Defined by Gauss’ Law,Annals Phys.354(2015) 316

    2015

  49. [57]

    Burgbacher, C

    F. Burgbacher, C. Lammerzahl, and A. Macias,Is There a Stable Hydrogen Atom in Higher Dimensions?,J. Math. Phys.40(1999) 625

    1999

  50. [58]

    Busso, R

    M. Busso, R. Gallino, and G. J. Wasserburg,Nucleosynthesis in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: Relevance for Galactic Enrichment and Solar System Formation,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.37(1999) 239

    1999

  51. [59]

    Buttazzo, G

    D. Buttazzo, G. Degrassi, P. P. Giardino, G. F. Giudice, F. Sala, A. Salvio, and A. Strumia,Investigating the Near-Criticality of the Higgs Boson,J. High Energy Phys.12(2013) 089

    2013

  52. [60]

    R. N. Cahn,The Eighteen Arbitrary Parameters of the Standard Model in Your Everyday Life,Rev. Mod. Phys. 68(1996) 951

    1996

  53. [61]

    Caprini and P

    C. Caprini and P. G. Ferreira,Constraints on the Electrical Charge Asymmetry of the Universe,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.02(2005) 006

    2005

  54. [62]

    Carr and G

    B. Carr and G. Ellis,Universe or Multiverse?Astron. Geophys.49(2008) 2.29

    2008

  55. [63]

    B. J. Carr and M. J. Rees,The Anthropic Principle and the Structure of the Physical World,Nature278(1979) 611

    1979

  56. [64]

    S. M. Carroll,In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned?essay commemorating David Albert’sTime and Chance, arXiv:1406.3057 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    S. M. Carroll, W. H. Press, and E. L. Turner,The Cosmological Constant,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.30 (1992) 499

    1992

  58. [66]

    S. M. Carroll and H. Tam,Unitary Evolution and Cosmological Fine-Tuning, arXiv:1007.1417 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    B. Carter,Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology, in: Confrontation of Cos- mological Theories with Observational Data,Proceedings of IAU Symposium63(1974) 291

    1974

  60. [68]

    Carter,The Anthropic Principle and its Implications for Biological Evolution,Philos

    B. Carter,The Anthropic Principle and its Implications for Biological Evolution,Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A310(1983) 347

    1983

  61. [69]

    Caruso, J

    F. Caruso, J. Martins, and V . Oguri,On the Existence of Hydrogen Atoms in Higher Dimensional Euclidean Spaces, Phys. Lett. A377(2013) 694

    2013

  62. [70]

    Chandrasekar,An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure, Univ

    S. Chandrasekar,An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure, Univ. Chicago Press (1939)

    1939

  63. [71]

    Chavanis,White Dwarf Stars in D Dimensions,Phys

    P.-H. Chavanis,White Dwarf Stars in D Dimensions,Phys. Rev.D76(2007) 3004

    2007

  64. [72]

    C. F. Chyba and K. P. Hand,Astrobiology:The Study of the Living Universe,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.43 (2005) 31

    2005

  65. [73]

    M. M. ´Cirkovi´c,The Anthropic Argument Against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe,Serb. Astron. J.161(2000) 33

    2000

  66. [74]

    Clavelli and R

    L. Clavelli and R. E. White, III,Problems in a Weakless Universe, hep-ph/0609050 (2006) 68

    2006 arXiv

  67. [75]

    D. D. Clayton,Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, Univ. Chicago Press (1983)

    1983

  68. [76]

    A. Coc, N. J. Nunes, K. A. Olive, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni,Coupled Variations of Fundamental Couplings and Primordial Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev.D76(2007) 023511

    2007

  69. [77]

    A. Coc, P. Descouvemont, K. A. Olive, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni,Variation of Fundamental Constants and the role of A=5and A=8Nuclei on Primordial Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev.D86(2012) 043529

    2012

  70. [78]

    A. Coc, M. Psopelov, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni,Modified Big Bang Nucleosynthesis with Nonstandard Neutron Sources,Phys. Rev.D90(2014) 5018

    2014

  71. [79]

    Coc, J.-P

    A. Coc, J.-P. Uzan, and E. Vangioni,Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and PrimordialCNOAbundances after Planck,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.10(2014) 050

    2014

  72. [80]

    Coleman,Fate of the False Vacuum: Semiclassical theory,Phys

    S. Coleman,Fate of the False Vacuum: Semiclassical theory,Phys. Rev.D15(1977) 2929

    1977

  73. [81]

    C. J. Copi, D. Huterer, D. J. Schwarz, and G. D. Starkman,On the Large-Angle Anomalies of the Microwave Sky,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.367(2006) 79

    2006

  74. [82]

    Corichi and D

    A. Corichi and D. Sloan,Inflationary Attractors and their Measures,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 062001

    2014

  75. [83]

    Csótó, H

    A. Csótó, H. Oberhummer, and H. Schlattl,Fine-Tuning the Basic Forces of Nature Through the Triple-Alpha Process in Red Giant Stars,Nuclear PhysicsA688(2001) 560

    2001

  76. [84]

    Damour and J

    T. Damour and J. F. Donoghue,Constraints on the Variability of Quark Masses from Nuclear Binding,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 014014

    2008

  77. [85]

    Davies,Time Variation of the Coupling Constants,J

    P.C.W. Davies,Time Variation of the Coupling Constants,J. Phys.A5(1972) 1296

    1972

  78. [86]

    Davies,The Anthropic Principle,Prog

    P.C.W. Davies,The Anthropic Principle,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.10(1983) 1

    1983

  79. [87]

    Davies,Multiverse Cosmological Models,Mod

    P.C.W. Davies,Multiverse Cosmological Models,Mod. Phys. Lett.19(2004) 727

    2004

  80. [88]

    Davies,The Goldilocks Enigma: Why is the Universe Just Right for Life?Allen Lane (2006)

    P.C.W. Davies,The Goldilocks Enigma: Why is the Universe Just Right for Life?Allen Lane (2006)

    2006

  81. [89]

    Davies and S

    P.C.W. Davies and S. D. Unwin,Why is the Cosmological Constant so Small,Proc. Royal Soc. LondonA377 (1981) 147

    1981

  82. [90]

    R. J. deBoer, J. Görres, M. Wiescher, R. E. Azuma, A. Best, C. R. Brune, C. E. Fields, S. Jones, M. Pignatari, D. Sayre, K. Smith, F. X. Timmes, and E. Uberseder,The12C(α,γ) 16OReaction and its Implications for Stellar Helium Burning,Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017) 035007

    2017

  83. [91]

    Dent and M

    T. Dent and M. Fairbairn,Time-varying Coupling Strengths, Nuclear Forces and Unification,Nuc. Phys.B653 (2003) 256

    2003

  84. [92]

    Deutsch,The Structure of the Multiverse,Proc

    D. Deutsch,The Structure of the Multiverse,Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A458(2002) 2911

    2002

  85. [93]

    Dine,Naturalness Under Stress,Ann

    M. Dine,Naturalness Under Stress,Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Phys.65(2015) 43

    2015

  86. [94]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and J. Silk,Planck Evidence for a Closed Universe and a Possible Crisis for Cosmology,Nature Astronomy4(2020) 196

    2020

  87. [95]

    J. F. Donoghue,The Weight for Random Quark Masses,Phys. Rev.D57(1998) 5499

    1998

  88. [96]

    J. F. Donoghue, K. Dutta, and A. Ross,Quark and Lepton Masses and Mixing in the Landscape,Phys. Rev.D 73(2006) 3002 69

    2006

  89. [97]

    J. F. Donoghue, K. Dutta, A. Ross, and M. Tegmark,Likely Values of the Higgs Vacuum Expectation Value, Phys. Rev.D81(2010) 3003

    2010

  90. [98]

    J. F. Donoghue,The Multiverse and Particle Physics,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci66(2016) 1

    2016

  91. [99]

    D. N. Dunbar, R. E. Pixley, W. A. Wenzel, and W. Whaling,The 7.68-MeV State in C 12,Phys. Rev.92(1953) 649

    1953

  92. [100]

    F. J. Dyson,Energy in the Universe,Scientific American225(1971) 50

    1971

  93. [101]

    Ehrenfest,In What Way does it become Manifest in the Fundamental Laws of Physics that Space has Three Dimensions?Proc

    P. Ehrenfest,In What Way does it become Manifest in the Fundamental Laws of Physics that Space has Three Dimensions?Proc. Amst. Acad.20(1918) 200

    1918

  94. [102]

    Ehrenfest,Welche Rolle spielt die Dreidimensionalität des Raumes in den Grundgesetzen der Physik?An- nalen der Physik366(1920) 440

    P. Ehrenfest,Welche Rolle spielt die Dreidimensionalität des Raumes in den Grundgesetzen der Physik?An- nalen der Physik366(1920) 440

    1920

  95. [103]

    Einstein,Autobiographical Notes, in P

    A. Einstein,Autobiographical Notes, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.)Albert Einstein-Philosopher Scientist, Tudor Pub- lishing, New York (1951)

    1951

  96. [104]

    Ellis, U

    G.F.R. Ellis, U. Kirchner, and W. R. Stoeger,Multiverses and Physical Cosmology,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 347(2004) 921

    2004

  97. [105]

    Ellis and J

    G.F.R. Ellis and J. Silk,Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics,Nature516(2014) 321

    2014

  98. [106]

    Ellis and D

    J. Ellis and D. V . Nanopoulos,A Refined Estimate of the Fine-Structure Constant,Nature292(1981) 436

    1981

  99. [107]

    Epelbaum, U.-G

    E. Epelbaum, U.-G. Meißner, and Glöckle,Nuclear Forces in the Chiral Limit,Nuc. Phys.A714(2003) 535

    2003

  100. [108]

    Epelbaum, H.-W

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner,Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces,Rev. Mod. Phys.81 (2009) 1773

    2009

  101. [109]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner,Ab Initio Calculation of the Hoyle State,Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(2011) 192501

    2011

  102. [110]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner,Structure and Rotations of the Hoyle State, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 2501

    2012

  103. [111]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner,Dependence of the Triple-alpha Process on the Fundamental Constants of Nature,European Phys. J.A49(2013) 82

    2013

  104. [112]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner,Viability of Carbon-Based Life as a Function of the Light Quark Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 2502

    2013

  105. [113]

    Efstathiou,An Anthropic Argument for a Cosmological Constant,Mon

    G. Efstathiou,An Anthropic Argument for a Cosmological Constant,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.274(1995) L73

    1995

  106. [114]

    J. L. Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann. Rev. Astron. As- trophys.48(2010) 495

    2010

  107. [115]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, and R. R. V olkas,Electric-Charge Quantization,J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.19(1993) 361

    1993

  108. [116]

    Foster and B

    J. Foster and B. Müller,Physics with Two Time Dimensions, arXiv:1001.2485 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  109. [117]

    W. A. Fowler,Experimental and Theoretical Nuclear Astrophysics: The quest for the origin of the elements, Rev. Mod. Phys.56(1984) 149

    1984

  110. [118]

    Frebel and T

    A. Frebel and T. C. Beers,The Formation of the Heaviest Elements,Phys. Today71(2018) 30 70

    2018

  111. [119]

    Freiburghaus, S

    C. Freiburghaus, S. Rosswog, and F.-K. Thielemann,R-Process in Neutron Star Mergers,Astrophys. J.525 (1999) 121

    1999

  112. [120]

    Freivogel,Making Predictions in the Multiverse,Class

    B. Freivogel,Making Predictions in the Multiverse,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 4007

    2011

  113. [121]

    Friederich,Fine Tuning, inThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed

    S. Friederich,Fine Tuning, inThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    J. A. Frieman, M. S. Turner, and D. Huterer,Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.46(2008) 385

    2008

  115. [123]

    Fukugita and P.J.E

    M. Fukugita and P.J.E. Peebles,The Cosmic Energy Inventory,Astrophys. J.616(2004) 643

    2004

  116. [124]

    M. K. Gaillard, P. D. Grannis, and F. J. Sciulli,The Standard Model of Particle Physics,Rev. Mod. Phys.71 (1999) S96

    1999

  117. [125]

    Gamow,Electricity, Gravity and Cosmology,Phys

    G. Gamow,Electricity, Gravity and Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.19(1967) 759

    1967

  118. [126]

    Garriga, T

    J. Garriga, T. Tanaka, and A. Vilenkin,Density Parameter and the Anthropic PrinciplePhys. Rev.D60(1999) 3501

    1999

  119. [127]

    Garriga and A

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin,On Likely Values of the Cosmological Constant,Phys. Rev.D61(2000) 083502

    2000

  120. [128]

    Garriga and A

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin,Solutions to the Cosmological Constant Problems,Phys. Rev.D64(2001) 023517

    2001

  121. [129]

    Garriga and A

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin,Anthropic Prediction forΛand the Q Catastrophe,Prog. Theor. Phys.163(2006) 245

    2006

  122. [130]

    Garriga and A

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin,Prediction and Explanation in the Multiverse,Phys. Rev.D77(2008) 043526

    2008

  123. [131]

    Gedalia, A

    O. Gedalia, A. Jenkins, and G. Perez,Why Do We Observe a Weak Force? The hierarchy problem in the multiverse,Phys. Rev.D83(2011) 5020

    2011

  124. [132]

    Gibbons and N

    G. Gibbons and N. Turok,The Measure Problem in Cosmology,Phys. Rev.D77(2008) 063516

    2008

  125. [133]

    Gleiser,Drake Equation for the Multiverse: from the String Landscape to Complex Life,Int

    M. Gleiser,Drake Equation for the Multiverse: from the String Landscape to Complex Life,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D19(2010) 1299

    2010

  126. [134]

    Gould,Anthropic Argument for Three Generations, arXiv:1011.2761 (2010)

    A. Gould,Anthropic Argument for Three Generations, arXiv:1011.2761 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  127. [135]

    M. L. Graesser, S. D. Hsu, A. Jenkins, and M. B. Wise,Anthropic Distribution for Cosmological Constant and Primordial Density Perturbations,Phys. Lett.B600(2004) 15

    2004

  128. [136]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,Superstring Theory: V olume 1, Cambridge University Press (2012)

    2012

  129. [137]

    Grohs, G

    E. Grohs, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto, and M. W. Paris,Probing Neutrino Physics with a Self-Consistent Treatment of the Weak Decoupling, Nucleosynthesis, and Photon Decoupling Epochs,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.5(2015) 017

    2015

  130. [138]

    Grohs, G

    E. Grohs, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto, M. W. Paris, and A. Vlasenko,Neutrino Energy Transport in Weak Decoupling and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev.D93(2016) 083522

    2016

  131. [139]

    Grohs, A

    E. Grohs, A. R. Howe, and F. C. Adams,Universes without the Weak Force: Astrophysical Processes with Stable Neutrons,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 3003

    2018

  132. [140]

    Gurevich and V

    L. Gurevich and V . Mostepanenko,On the Existence of Atoms in N-dimensional Space,Phys. Lett.A35(1971) 201 71

    1971

  133. [141]

    Gustafsson, T

    B. Gustafsson, T. Karlsson, E. Olsson, B. Edvardsson, and N. Ryde,The Origin of Carbon, Investigated by Spectral Analysis of Solar-type Stars in the Galactic Disk,Astron. Astrophys.342(1999) 426

    1999

  134. [142]

    A. H. Guth,Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev.D 23(1981) 347

    1981

  135. [143]

    A. H. Guth,Inflation and Eternal Inflation,Phys. Reports333(2000) 555

    2000

  136. [144]

    A. H. Guth,Eternal Inflation and its Implications,J. Phys.A40(2007) 6811

    2007

  137. [145]

    A. H. Guth and S.-Y . Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110

    1982

  138. [146]

    A. H. Guth, D. I. Kaiser, and Y . Nomura,Inflationary Paradigm after Planck 2013,Phys. Lett.B733(2014) 112

    2013

  139. [147]

    L. J. Hall and Y . Nomura,Evidence for the Multiverse in the Standard Model and Beyond,Phys. Rev.D78 (2008) 5001

    2008

  140. [148]

    L. J. Hall and Y . Nomura,A Finely-Predicted Higgs Boson Mass from a Finely-Tuned Weak Scale,J. High Energy Phys.3(2010) 076

    2010

  141. [149]

    L. J. Hall, D. Pinner and J. T. Ruderman,The Weak Scale from BBN,J. High Energy Phys.12(2014) 134

    2014

  142. [150]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, and B. Sung,On the Scarcity of Weak Coupling in the String Landscape,J. High Energy Phys.02(2018) 113

    2018

  143. [151]

    C. J. Hansen and S. D. Kawaler,Stellar Interiors: Physical Principles, Structure, and Evolution, Springer (1994)

    1994

  144. [152]

    Harnik, G

    R. Harnik, G. D. Kribs, and G. Perez,A Universe without Weak Interactions,Phys. Rev.D74(2006) 035006

    2006

  145. [153]

    Hartle and M

    J. Hartle and M. Srednicki,Are We Typical?Phys. Rev.D75(2007) 123523

    2007

  146. [154]

    Hartle and T

    J. Hartle and T. Hertog,Anthropic Bounds onΛfrom the No-Boundary Quantum State,Phys. Rev.D88 (2013) 123516

    2013

  147. [155]

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page,How Probable is Inflation?Nuc. Phys.B298(1988) 789

    1988

  148. [156]

    Helbig,Is there a Flatness Problem in Classical Cosmology?Mon

    P. Helbig,Is there a Flatness Problem in Classical Cosmology?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.421(2012) 561

    2012

  149. [157]

    Henry, M

    R.B.C. Henry, M. G. Edmunds, and J. Köppen,On the Cosmic Origins of Carbon and Nitrogen,Astrophys. J. 541(2000) 660

    2000

  150. [158]

    C. J. Hogan,Why the Universe is Just So,Rev. Mod. Phys.72(2000) 1149

    2000

  151. [159]

    C. J. Hogan,Nuclear Astrophysics of Worlds in the String Landscape,Phys. Rev.D74(2006) 123514

    2006

  152. [160]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald,An Alternative to Inflation,Gen. Rel. Grav.34(2002) 2043

    2002

  153. [161]

    Hossenfelder,Screams for Explanation: Fine-tuning and Naturalness in the Foundations of Physics, arXiv:1801.02176 (2018)

    S. Hossenfelder,Screams for Explanation: Fine-tuning and Naturalness in the Foundations of Physics, arXiv:1801.02176 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  154. [162]

    A. R. Howe, E. Grohs, and F. C. Adams,Nuclear Processes in Other Universes: Varying the strength of the weak force,Phys. Rev.D98(2018) 3014

    2018

  155. [163]

    Hoyle,On Nuclear Reactions Occuring in Very Hot Stars

    F. Hoyle,On Nuclear Reactions Occuring in Very Hot Stars. I. The Synthesis of Elements from Carbon to Nickel,Astrophys. J. Suppl.1(1954) 121 72

    1954

  156. [164]

    Huang, F

    L. Huang, F. C. Adams, and E. Grohs,Sensitivity of Carbon and Oxygen Yields to the Triple-Alpha Resonance in Massive Stars,Astropart. Phys.105(2019) 13

    2019

  157. [165]

    Huterer,A Course in Cosmology: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2024

    D. Huterer,A Course in Cosmology: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2024

    2024

  158. [166]

    M. Ibe, A. Kusenko, and T. T. Yanagida,Why Three Generations?Phys. Lett.B758(2016) 365

    2016

  159. [167]

    Ijjas, P

    A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, and A. Loeb,Inflationary Paradigm in Trouble after Planck2013,Phys. Lett.B723 (2013) 261

    2013

  160. [168]

    Ikoma and H

    M. Ikoma and H. Genda,Constraints on the Mass of a Habitable Planet with Water of Nebular Origin,Astro- phys. J.648(2006) 696

    2006

  161. [169]

    Iwamoto, F

    K. Iwamoto, F. Brachwitz, K. Nomoto, N. Kishimoto, H. Umeda, W. R. Hix, and F.-K. Thielemann,Nucle- osynthesis in Chandrasekhar Mass Models for Type IA Supernovae and Constraints on Progenitor Systems and Burning-Front Propagation,Astrophys. J. Suppl.125(1999) 439

    1999

  162. [170]

    R. L. Jaffe, A. Jenkins, and I. Kimchi,Quark Masses: An Environmental Impact Statement,Phys. Rev.D79 (2009) 5014

    2009

  163. [171]

    Janka,Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae,Ann

    H.-Th. Janka,Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae,Ann. Rev. Nuc. Part. Sci.62(2012) 407

    2012

  164. [172]

    Janka, K

    H.-Th. Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and B. Müller,Theory of Core-Collapse Super- novae,Phys. Reports442(2007) 38

    2007

  165. [173]

    T. E. Jeltema and M. Sher,Triple-alpha Process and the Anthropically Allowed Values of the Weak Scale,Phys. Rev.D61(2000) 017301

    2000

  166. [174]

    G. G. Jonsson and K. Lindgren,Compilation and Analysis of Intermediate-and High-energy Photon and Elec- tron Induced Spallation Yields,Physica Scripta7(1973) 49

    1973

  167. [175]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest,Supersymmetric Dark Matter,Phys. Reports267(1996) 195

    1996

  168. [176]

    Kaib,Galactic Effects on Habitability, Review Chapter forHandbook of Exoplanets, arXiv:1801.01474 (2018)

    N. Kaib,Galactic Effects on Habitability, Review Chapter forHandbook of Exoplanets, arXiv:1801.01474 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi,de Sitter Vacua in String Theory,Phys. Rev.D68(2003) 046005

    2003

  170. [178]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,M Theory, Cosmological Constant, and Anthropic Principle,Phys. Rev.D67(2003) 3510

    2003

  171. [179]

    Kaloper, M

    N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. Lawrence, S. Shenker, and L. Susskind,Initial Conditions for Inflation,J. High Energy Phys.11(2002) 037

    2002

  172. [180]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess,The Hubble Tension and Early Dark EnergyAnn. Rev. Nucl. Part Sci.71 (2023) 153

    2023

  173. [181]

    Kane,Modern Elementary Particle Physics, Cambridge Univ

    G. Kane,Modern Elementary Particle Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press (2017)

    2017

  174. [182]

    G. L. Kane, M. J. Perry, and A. N. Zytkow,The Beginning of the End of the Anthropic Principle,New Astron- omy7(2002) 45

    2002

  175. [183]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Relaxing to Three Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 1601

    2005

  176. [184]

    Abdul Karim et al

    M. Abdul Karim et al. [DESI],DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints, arXiv:2503.14738 73

    arXiv

  177. [185]

    J. F. Kasting, D. P. Whitmire, and R. T. Reynolds,Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars,Icarus101 (1993) 108

    1993

  178. [186]

    J. F. Kasting and D. Catling,Evolution of a Habitable Planet,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.41(2003) 429

    2003

  179. [187]

    R. A. King, A. Siddiqi, W. D. Allen, and H. F. Schaefer III,Chemistry as a Function of the Fine-Structure Constant and the Electron-Proton Mass Ratio,Phys. Rev.A81(2010) 042523

    2010

  180. [188]

    Kippenhahn and A

    R. Kippenhahn and A. Weigert,Stellar Structure and Evolution, Springer (1990)

    1990

  181. [189]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Addison-Wesley (1990)

    1990

  182. [190]

    Lahav and A

    O. Lahav and A. R. Liddle,The Cosmological Parameters 2024, inThe Review of Particle Physics 2024, arXiv:2403.15526 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  183. [191]

    T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner,Dependence of the Triple-alpha Process on the Fundamental Constants of Nature,European Phys. J.A49(2013) 82

    2013

  184. [192]

    Lammer, J

    H. Lammer, J. H. Bredehöft, A. Coustenis, M. L. Khodachenko, L. Kaltenegger, O. Grasset, D. Prieur, F. Raulin, P. Ehrenfreund, M. Yamauchi, J.-E. Wahlund, J.-M. Grießmeier, G. Stangl, C. D. Cockell, Yu. N. Kulikov, J. L. Grenfell, and H. Rauer,What Makes a Planet Habitable?Ast...

    2009

  185. [193]

    Langacker,Grand Unified Theories and Proton Decay,Phys

    P. Langacker,Grand Unified Theories and Proton Decay,Phys. Reports72(1981) 185

    1981

  186. [194]

    G. F. Lewis and L. A. Barnes,A Fortunate Universe, Cambridge Univ. Press (2016)

    2016

  187. [195]

    A. R. Lidde,How Many Cosmological Parameters?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.351(2004) L49

    2004

  188. [196]

    E. H. Lieb,The Stability of Matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1975) 553

    1975

  189. [197]

    E. H. Lieb,The Stability of Matter: From Atoms to Stars,Bull. Amer. Math Soc.22(1990) 1

    1990

  190. [198]

    E. H. Lieb and H.-T. Yau,Many-body Stability Implies a Bound on the Fine-structure Constant,Phys. Rev.D 61(1988) 1695

    1988

  191. [199]

    E. H. Lieb and H.-T. Yau,The Stability and Instability of Relativistic Matter,Comm. Math. Phys.118(1988) 177

    1988

  192. [200]

    A. D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Lett.B129(1983) 177

    1983

  193. [201]

    A. D. Linde,The Inflationary Universe,Rep. Prog. Phys.47(1984) 925

    1984

  194. [202]

    A. D. Linde,Eternal Chaotic Inflation,Mod. Phys. Lett.A1(1986) 81

    1986

  195. [203]

    A. D. Linde,A Brief History of the Multiverse,Ref. Prog. Phys.80(2017) 022001

    2017

  196. [204]

    A. D. Linde and V . Vanchurin,How Many Universes are in the Multiverse?Phys. Rev.D81(2010) 083525

    2010

  197. [205]

    Livio, D

    M. Livio, D. Hollowell, J. M. Truran, and A. Weiss,The Anthropic Significance of the Existence of an Excited State of C-12,Nature340(1989) 281

    1989

  198. [206]

    Livio and M

    M. Livio and M. J. Rees,Anthropic Reasoning,Science309(2005) 1022

    2005

  199. [207]

    Livio and M

    M. Livio and M. J. Rees,Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse, inConsolidation of Fine-Tuning, arXiv:1801.06944 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  200. [208]

    J. I. Lunine,Earth: Evolution of a Habitable World, Cambridge Univ. Press (1999) 74

    1999

  201. [209]

    J. I. Lunine,Astrobiology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Pearson (2005)

    2005

  202. [210]

    R. A. Lyttleton and H. Bondi,On the Physical Consequences of a General Excess of Charge,Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A252(1959) 313

    1959

  203. [211]

    MacDonald and D

    J. MacDonald and D. J. Mullan,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: The strong nuclear force meets the weak anthropic principle,Phys. Rev.D80(2009) 043507

    2009

  204. [212]

    Martel, P

    H. Martel, P. R. Shapiro, and S. Weinberg,Likely Values of the Cosmological Constant,Astrophys. J.492 (1998) 29

    1998

  205. [213]

    Martin,Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Cosmological Constant Problem (but were afraid to ask),Comp

    J. Martin,Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Cosmological Constant Problem (but were afraid to ask),Comp. Rendus Phys.13(2012) 566

    2012

  206. [214]

    C. P. McKay,Requirements and Limits for Life in the Context of Exoplanets,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.111(2014) 12628

    2014

  207. [215]

    Meißner,Anthropic Considerations in Nuclear Physics,Sci

    U.-G. Meißner,Anthropic Considerations in Nuclear Physics,Sci. Bull.60(2015) 43

    2015

  208. [216]

    Meißner,The Long and Winding Road from Chiral Effective Lagrangians to Nuclear Structure,Physica Scripta91(2016) 3005

    U.-G. Meißner,The Long and Winding Road from Chiral Effective Lagrangians to Nuclear Structure,Physica Scripta91(2016) 3005

    2016

  209. [217]

    Mersini-Houghton and F

    L. Mersini-Houghton and F. C. Adams,Limitations of Anthropic Predictions for the Cosmological Constant Λ: Cosmic heat death of anthropic observers,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 165002

    2008

  210. [218]

    J. Muir, S. Adhikari, and D. Huterer,The Covariance of CMB Anomalies,Phys. Rev.D98(2018) 023521

    2018

  211. [219]

    Nath and P

    P. Nath and P. Fileviez Pérez,Proton Stability in Grand Unified Theories, in Strings and in Branes,Phys. Reports441(2007) 191

    2007

  212. [220]

    Nomoto, K

    K. Nomoto, K. Iwamoto, N. Nakasato, F.-K. Thielemann, F. Brachwitz, T. Tsujimoto, Y . Kubo, and N. Kishi- moto,Nucleosynthesis in Type Ia Supernovae,Nuc. Phys.A621(1997) 467

    1997

  213. [221]

    Oberhummer, A

    H. Oberhummer, A. Csótó, and H. Schlattl,Stellar Production Rates of Carbon and Its Abundance in the Universe,Science289(2000) 88

    2000

  214. [222]

    B. K. Oh, J. A. Peacock, S. Khochfar, and B. D. Smith,The Fate of Baryons in Counterfactual Universes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.517(2022) 59

    2022

  215. [223]

    L. E. Orgel,The Origin of Life – How Long did it Take?Orig. Life Evol. Bio.28(1998) 91

    1998

  216. [224]

    Orito and M

    S. Orito and M. Yoshimura,Can the Universe be Charged?Phys. Rev. Lett.54(1985) 2457

    1985

  217. [225]

    Padmanabhan,Cosmological Constant – The Weight of the Vacuum,Phys

    T. Padmanabhan,Cosmological Constant – The Weight of the Vacuum,Phys. Reports380(2003) 235

    2003

  218. [226]

    D. N. Page,Anthropic Estimates of the Charge and Mass of the Proton,Phys. Lett.B675(2009) 398

    2009

  219. [227]

    D. N. Page,Anthropic Estimates for Many Parameters of Physics and Astronomy, arXiv:1703.03462 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  220. [228]

    Parizot and L

    E. Parizot and L. Drury,Spallative Nucleosynthesis in Supernova Remnants. I. Analytical Estimates,Astron. Astrophys.346(1999) 329

    1999

  221. [229]

    Paxton, L

    B. Paxton, L. Bildsten, A. Dotter, F. Herwig, P. Lesaffre, and F. X. Timmes,Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA),Astrophys. J. Suppl.192(2011) 3

    2011

  222. [230]

    Paxton, M

    B. Paxton, M. Cantiello, P. Arras, L. Bildsten, E. F. Brown, A. Dotter, C. Mankovich, M. H. Montgomery, D. Stello, F. X. Timmes, and R. Townsend,Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208(2...

    2013

  223. [231]

    J. A. Peacock,Cosmological Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press (1999)

    1999

  224. [232]

    J. A. Peacock,Testing Anthropic Predictions forΛand the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.379(2007) 1067

    2007

  225. [233]

    J. A. Peacock,Naturalness, Fine-tuning, and Observer Selection in Cosmology, inFine-Tuning in the Physical Universe, eds. D. Sloan, R. Alves Batista, M. Hicks, and R. D. Davies (2020) Cambridge University Press, 67

    2020

  226. [234]

    Peebles,The Gravitational Instability of the Universe,Astrophys

    P.J.E. Peebles,The Gravitational Instability of the Universe,Astrophys. J.147(1967) 859

    1967

  227. [235]

    A. C. Phillips,The Physics of Stars, Wiley (1994)

    1994

  228. [236]

    Pochet, J

    T. Pochet, J. M. Pearson, G. Beaudet, and H. Reeves,The Binding of Light Nuclei, and the Anthropic Principle, Astron. Astrophys.243(1991) 1

    1991

  229. [237]

    Pogosian, A

    L. Pogosian, A. Vilenkin, and M. Tegmark,Anthropic Predictions for Vacuum Energy and Neutrino Masses, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.07(2004) 005

    2004

  230. [238]

    J. P. Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1365

    1979

  231. [239]

    W. H. Press and P. Schecter,Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation,Astrophys. J.187(1974) 425

    1974

  232. [240]

    M. J. Rees,Cosmological Significance of e 2/Gm2 and Related Large Numbers,Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics4(1972) 179

    1972

  233. [241]

    M. J. Rees,Black Hole Models for Active Galactic Nuclei,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.22(1984) 471

    1984

  234. [242]

    M. J. Rees,Before the Beginning: Our Universe and Others, Helix Books (1998)

    1998

  235. [243]

    M. J. Rees,Just Six Numbers, Basic Books (2000)

    2000

  236. [244]

    M. J. Rees,Numerical Coincidences and ‘Tuning’ in Cosmology,Astrophys. Space Sci.285(2003) 375

    2003

  237. [245]

    M. J. Rees and J. P. Ostriker,Cooling, Dynamics and Fragmentation of Massive Gas Clouds: Clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.179(1977) 541

    1977

  238. [246]

    A. G. Riess, A. V . Filippenko, P. Challis, et al.,Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant,Astron. J.116(1998) 1009

    1998

  239. [247]

    V . A. Rubakov and M. E. Shaposhnikov,Extra Space-Time Dimensions: Towards a solution to the cosmologi- cal constant problem,Phys. Lett.B125(1983) 139

    1983

  240. [248]

    Sahni,The Cosmological Constant Problem and Quintessence,Class

    V . Sahni,The Cosmological Constant Problem and Quintessence,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3435

    2002

  241. [249]

    Saio and K

    H. Saio and K. Nomoto,Evolution of a Merging Pair ofC+OWhite Dwarfs to Form a Single Neutron Star, Astron. Astrophys. Lett.150(1985) L21

    1985

  242. [250]

    A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe,J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett.5(1967) 24

    1967

  243. [251]

    A. D. Sakharov,Cosmological Transitions with Alteration of the Metric Signature,Zhurn. Eks. Teoret. Fiz.87 (1984) 375

    1984

  244. [252]

    E. E. Salpeter,Nuclear Reactions in Stars Without Hydrogen,Astrophys. J.115(1952) 326

    1952

  245. [253]

    E. E. Salpeter,The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution,Astrophys. J.121(1955) 161 76

    1955

  246. [254]

    Sandora,The Fine-Structure Constant and Habitable Planets,J

    M. Sandora,The Fine-Structure Constant and Habitable Planets,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.8(2016) 048

    2016

  247. [255]

    Sandora,Anthropics of Aluminum-26 Decay and Biological Homochirality,J

    M. Sandora,Anthropics of Aluminum-26 Decay and Biological Homochirality,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.11 (2017) 025

    2017

  248. [256]

    Sandora, V

    M. Sandora, V . Airapetian, L. Barnes, G. F. Lewis, and I. Pérez-Rodríguez,Multiverse Predictions for Habit- ability: Element Abundances,Universe8(2022) 651

    2022

  249. [257]

    Sandora, V

    M. Sandora, V . Airapetian, L. Barnes, and G. F. Lewis,Multiverse Predictions for Habitability: Stellar and Atmospherica Habitability,Universe9(2022) 4

    2022

  250. [258]

    Sandora,Multiverse Predictions for Habitability: Fundamental Physics and Galactic Habitability, Preprint (2025) arXiv:2509.08220

    M. Sandora,Multiverse Predictions for Habitability: Fundamental Physics and Galactic Habitability, Preprint (2025) arXiv:2509.08220

    2025 arXiv

  251. [259]

    Sandora,Multiverse Predictions for Habitability: The Habitability of Exotic Environments, Preprint (2025) arXiv:2505.20557

    M. Sandora,Multiverse Predictions for Habitability: The Habitability of Exotic Environments, Preprint (2025) arXiv:2505.20557

    2025 arXiv

  252. [260]

    C. A. Scharf,Extrasolar Planets and Astrobiology, Univ. Science Books (2009)

    2009

  253. [261]

    A. N. Schellekens,The Emperor’s Last Clothes? Overlooking the String Theory Landscape,Rep. Prog. Phys. 71(2008) 2201

    2008

  254. [262]

    A. N. Schellekens,Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.85(2013) 1491

    2013

  255. [263]

    J. S. Schiffrin and R. M. Wald,Measure and Probability in Cosmology,Phys. Rev.D86(2012) 023521

    2012

  256. [264]

    Schlattl, A

    H. Schlattl, A. Heger, H. Oberhummer, T. Rauscher, and A. Csótó,Sensitivity of theCandOProduction on the 3αRate,Astrophys. Space Sci.291(2004) 27

    2004

  257. [265]

    F. H. Shu, F. C. Adams, and S. Lizano,Star Formation in Molecular Clouds: Observation and Theory,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.25(1987) 23

    1987

  258. [266]

    Silk,Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation,Astrophys

    J. Silk,Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and Galaxy Formation,Astrophys. J.151(1968) 459

    1968

  259. [267]

    Sloan, R

    D. Sloan, R. Alves Batista, and A. Loeb,The Resilience of Life to Astrophysical Events,Sci. Reports7(2017) 5419

    2017

  260. [268]

    M. S. Smith, L. H. Kawano, and R. A. Malaney,Experimental, Computational, and Observational Analysis of Primordial Nucleosynthesis,Astrophys. J. Suppl.85(1993) 219

    1993

  261. [269]

    G. F. Smoot, C. L. Bennett, A. Kogut, et al.,Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First- year Maps,Astrophys. J.396(1992) L1

    1992

  262. [270]

    Solà,Cosmological Constant and Vacuum Energy: Old and new ideas,J

    J. Solà,Cosmological Constant and Vacuum Energy: Old and new ideas,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.453(2013) 2015

    2013

  263. [271]

    Sorini, J

    D. Sorini, J. A. Peacock, and L. Lombriser,The Impact of the Cosmological Constant on Past and Future Star FormationMon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.535(2024) 1449

    2024

  264. [272]

    D. N. Spergel, R. Bean, O. Doré, et al.,Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Obser- vations: Implications for Cosmology,Astrophys. J. Suppl.170(2007) 377

    2007

  265. [273]

    S. W. Stahler,Deuterium and the Stellar Birthline,Astrophys. J.332(1988) 804

    1988

  266. [274]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett.B117(1982) 175 77

    1982

  267. [275]

    F. D. Steffen,Dark Matter Candidates: Axions, neutralinos, gravitinos, and axinos,European Phys. J.C59 (2009) 557

    2009

  268. [276]

    Steigman and R

    G. Steigman and R. J. Scherrer,Is The Universal Matter–Antimatter Asymmetry Fine Tuned?inConsolidation of Fine-Tuning, arXiv:1801.10059 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  269. [277]

    P. J. Steinhardt,The Inflation Debate: Is the theory at the heart of modern cosmology deeply flawed?Scientific American304(2011) 36

    2011

  270. [278]

    P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner,Prescription for Successful New Inflation,Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 2162

    1984

  271. [279]

    Sudoh, T

    T. Sudoh, T. Totani, R. Makiya, and M. Nagashima,Testing Anthropic Reasoning for the Cosmological Con- stant with a Realistic Galaxy Formation Model,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 1563

    2017

  272. [280]

    Susskind,The Anthropic Landscape of String Theory, inThe Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation, ed

    L. Susskind,The Anthropic Landscape of String Theory, inThe Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation, ed. M. Kaplinghat, N. Kaloper, and L. Knox (2003) 26

    2003

  273. [281]

    Susskind,Supersymmetry Breaking in the Anthropic Landscape, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavi- gating Theoretical Physics:Ian Kogan Memorial Collection, ed

    L. Susskind,Supersymmetry Breaking in the Anthropic Landscape, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavi- gating Theoretical Physics:Ian Kogan Memorial Collection, ed. Shifman Misha et al., World Scientific (2005) 1745

    2005

  274. [282]

    Susskind,The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design, Little, Brown and Company (2005)

    L. Susskind,The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design, Little, Brown and Company (2005)

    2005

  275. [283]

    Z. G. Tan and A. Bonasera,Mean Field Effects in the Quark Gluon Plasma,Nucl. Phys.A784(2007) 368

    2007

  276. [284]

    F. R. Tangherlini,Schwarzschild Field in N Dimensions and the Dimensionality of Space Problem,Nuovo Cimento27(1963) 636

    1963

  277. [285]

    Tegmark,On the Dimensionality of Spacetime,Class

    M. Tegmark,On the Dimensionality of Spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) L69

    1997

  278. [286]

    Tegmark,Is the Theory of Everything Merely the Ultimate Ensemble Theory?Ann

    M. Tegmark,Is the Theory of Everything Merely the Ultimate Ensemble Theory?Ann. Physics270(1998) 1

    1998

  279. [287]

    Tegmark,What does Inflation Really Predict?J

    M. Tegmark,What does Inflation Really Predict?J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.04(2005) 001

    2005

  280. [288]

    Tegmark and M

    M. Tegmark and M. J. Rees,Why Is the Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuation Level10 −5?Astrophys. J.499(1998) 526

    1998

  281. [289]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. Aguirre, M. J. Rees, and F. Wilczek,Dimensionless Constants, Cosmology, and other Dark Matters,Phys. Rev.D73(2006) 3505

    2006

  282. [290]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. Vilenkin, and L. Pogosian,Anthropic Predictions for Neutrino Masses,Phys. Rev.D71(2005) 3523

    2005

  283. [291]

    ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nuc

    G. ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nuc. Phys.B79(1974) 276

    1974

  284. [292]

    ’t Hooft,Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking,NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft,Naturalness, Chiral Symmetry, and Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking,NATO Sci. Ser.B59 (1980) 135

    1980

  285. [293]

    R. I. Thompson,The Relation between Fundamental Constants and Particle Physics Parameters,Universe3 (2017) 6

    2017

  286. [294]

    T. A. Thompson,Gas Giants in Hot Water: Inhibiting giant planet formation and planet habitability in dense star clusters through cosmic time,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431(2013) 63

    2013

  287. [295]

    F. X. Timmes, S. E. Woosley, and T. A. Weaver,Galactic Chemical Evolution: Hydrogen through Zinc, Astrophys. J. Suppl.98(1995) 617 78

    1995

  288. [296]

    Trimble,The Origin and Abundances of the Chemical Elements,Rev

    V . Trimble,The Origin and Abundances of the Chemical Elements,Rev. Mod. Phys.47(1975) 877

    1975

  289. [297]

    C. Tur, A. Heger, and S. M. Austin,Production of 26Al, 44Ti,and 60Fein Core-Collapse Supernovae: Sensi- tivity to the Rates of the Triple-Alpha and 12C(α,γ) 16OReactions,Astrophys. J.718(2010) 357

    2010

  290. [298]

    Turok,A Critical Review of Inflation,Class

    N. Turok,A Critical Review of Inflation,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3449

    2002

  291. [299]

    Tye and I

    S.-H H. Tye and I. Wassarman,Brane World Solution to the Cosmological Constant Problem,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(2001) 1682

    2001

  292. [300]

    Uzan,The Fundamental Constants and their Variation: Observational and theoretical status,Rev

    J.-P. Uzan,The Fundamental Constants and their Variation: Observational and theoretical status,Rev. Mod. Phys.75(2003) 403

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.