Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Delving into the depths of NGC 3783 with XRISM. I. Kinematic and ionization structure of the highly ionized outflows

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies a broad iron absorption trough in the XRISM spectrum of NGC 3783 as a wind moving at 5 percent of the speed of light, energetic enough to contribute to host-galaxy feedback.

desk verdict Careful XRISM/Resolve analysis with a rich Fe line series; the 0.05c Fe XXVI claim is real but hinges on a fixed ionization parameter that a referee needs to push on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09395 v2 pith:AGOOXCV3 submitted 2025-06-11 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Missagh Mehdipour , Jelle S. Kaastra , Megan E. Eckart , Liyi Gu , Ralf Ballhausen , Ehud Behar , Camille M. Diez , Keigo Fukumura
show 12 more authors
Matteo Guainazzi Kouichi Hagino Timothy R. Kallman Erin Kara Chen Li Jon M. Miller Misaki Mizumoto Hirofumi Noda Shoji Ogawa Christos Panagiotou Atsushi Tanimoto Keqin Zhao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords AGNoutflowsultra-fastoutflowwarmabsorberX-rayspectroscopyXRISMResolvemicrocalorimeterNGC3783photoionizationmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses the first high-resolution X-ray spectrum of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 3783, taken with the XRISM/Resolve microcalorimeter, to map the hot gas streaming away from its supermassive black hole. It finds six distinct absorption components in the 1.8-12 keV band: five narrow outflows moving at 560-1170 km/s and one broad Fe XXVI absorption trough blueshifted by 14,300 km/s, or 0.05 c. The fast component's kinetic luminosity is 0.8-3% of the galaxy's bolometric luminosity, which puts it in the range that can matter for feedback on the host galaxy. The same spectrum shows turbulent velocity rising with ionization parameter while column density first falls and then rises, which the authors interpret as a hybrid wind driven by different mechanisms at different radii.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the six photoionized absorption components labeled A1, A2, A3, B, C, and X, each a parcel of ionized gas along the line of sight defined by four fitted parameters — outflow velocity $v_{\rm out}$, ionization parameter $\log \xi$, column density $N_{\rm H}$, and turbulent velocity $\sigma_v$ — and the argument consists of measuring these in the XRISM/Resolve spectrum, an X-ray microcalorimeter with roughly 4.5 eV resolution over 1.8-12 keV, and reading the trends between components. The hinge of the paper is the identification of the broad 7.1-7.4 keV trough as Fe XXVI Ly$\alpha$ of component X; the diagnostics are the relations among the components — $\sigma_v$ rising with $\xi$, $N_{\rm H}$ falling then rising, and $v_{\rm out}$ jumping above $\log \xi = 3.2$ — which the paper interprets through the absorption measure distribution and existing thermal and magnetic wind models.

What would settle it

Re-fit the Resolve spectrum with the simultaneously measured 2024 ionizing SED from the campaign's XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations in place of the 2001 SED: if the 7.1-7.4 keV trough no longer requires Fe XXVI Ly$\alpha$ blueshifted by roughly 14,300 km/s, or if its required column density and kinetic luminosity move outside the quoted ranges, the central claim fails. A longer exposure that also resolves Fe XXVI Ly$\beta$ at the same blueshift would confirm the identification; a trough that no single Fe XXVI transition can reproduce would rule it out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the broad absorption trough between 7.1 and 7.4 keV in the XRISM/Resolve spectrum of NGC 3783 is Fe XXVI Ly$\alpha$ absorption blueshifted by 14,300 $\pm$ 1,100 km/s (0.05 c), with column density $N_{\rm H} = (1.07 \pm 0.14) \times 10^{24}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$ and a kinetic luminosity of 0.8-3% of the bolometric luminosity. The paper further claims that the same spectrum, modeled with photoionized absorption components, resolves six outflows and, for the first time in this source, measures the turbulent velocity of each: the measurements show turbulent velocity increasing with ionization parameter (0 to 3500 km/s across $\log \xi = 1.65$ to 4.0), column density declining up to $\log \xi = 3.2$ and rising beyond it, and a Fe XXV resonance line whose absorption profile closely matches the UV Ly$\alpha$ and C IV lines seen with HST, implying the outflow is clumpy. On this basis the authors argue for a hybrid wind: a fast, magnetically driven disk wind close to the black hole, surrounded by slower, thermally driven outflows farther out.

Load-bearing premise

The photoionization models assume the 2001 unobscured spectral energy distribution of NGC 3783 is the right ionizing continuum for the 2024 observation; if the true 2024 SED is harder or softer, the ionization parameters, column densities, and especially the identification and energetics of the 0.05 c outflow component would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Component X alone carries 0.8-3% of the bolometric luminosity as kinetic power, above the roughly 0.5% threshold usually taken for an outflow to matter for AGN feedback.
  • The resolved structure shows that ultra-fast outflows and slower warm absorbers are not cleanly separate classes: in NGC 3783 they are six components of one multi-phase wind whose turbulent velocity grows with ionization parameter.
  • Because the Fe XXV absorption profile matches the UV Ly$\alpha$ and C IV profiles, the outflow gas must be clumpy, with dense cooler clouds embedded in hotter diffuse gas; single-zone models will miss this structure.
  • The absorption measure distribution, with column density falling up to $\log \xi = 3.2$ and rising beyond, together with the velocity jump above that value, points to a hybrid wind that is thermally driven at large radius and magnetically driven close to the black hole.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fast component is launched near its escape radius (about $10^{16}$ cm from a $2.8 \times 10^7$ solar-mass black hole), its inferred gas density lands in the same $10^8~{\rm cm}^{-3}$ range as the clumps in PDS 456, hinting at a common clump scale for ultra-fast outflows that a small sample of similar galaxies could test.
  • The ionization parameter of component X is fixed to $\log \xi = 4.0$ because only one line is detected; a future spectrum capturing Fe XXVI Ly$\beta$ at the same blueshift would measure $\xi$ directly and could revise the column density and kinetic luminosity significantly.
  • The analysis uses only the time-averaged spectrum, leaving the 9-day variability unexplored; tracking the trough's equivalent width over time would reveal whether the 0.05 c wind is steady or episodic, which changes its time-averaged feedback.
  • If the turbulent velocity versus ionization parameter correlation holds in other sources, it offers observers a one-spectrum diagnostic for where a wind is launched, without needing spatial resolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an XRISM/Resolve (439 ks) study of the Seyfert-1 galaxy NGC 3783, modeling the time-averaged 1.8-12 keV spectrum with SPEX and photoionization tables from the pion model. The authors identify six absorption components: five narrow components with vout = 560-1170 km/s, log xi = 1.65-3.56, and NH = (3.6-23)e21 cm^-2, plus a broad component (Comp. X) interpreted as Fe XXVI Ly-alpha blueshifted by 14,300 +/- 1,100 km/s (0.05c) with NH = (1.07 +/- 0.14)e24 cm^-2, log xi fixed at 4.0, and sigma_v ~ 3500 km/s. They report that turbulent velocity increases with ionization parameter, that NH declines up to log xi = 3.2 and then rises, and that the Fe XXV profile resembles the HST/COS Ly-alpha and C IV profiles, indicating a clumpy, multi-zone outflow. From Comp. X they derive Lkin/Lbol = 0.008-0.03 and argue for a hybrid wind with a magnetically driven inner disk wind and thermally driven outer outflows.

Significance. If the Comp. X identification holds, this paper delivers the first resolved Fe K-band measurement of a 0.05c outflow in NGC 3783, with energetics in the regime relevant for AGN feedback, and the first direct measurement of a turbulent-velocity-ionization-parameter correlation across multiple outflow components in a single object. The analysis is careful: the fit reaches C-stat/expected ~ 1.0, the instrumental error budget (energy scale, gain reconstruction, resolution) is quantified and propagated, the broad trough is tested against reflection models (refl, MyTorus) and against the independent Xtend spectrum, and atomic data are drawn from standard sources (NIST, FAC) with stated precision. The contemporaneous HST/COS comparison provides a model-independent check of the clumpy, multi-phase outflows, and the AMD and velocity trends constitute a falsifiable correlation test for wind models. The central caveat is that the headline 0.05c component rests on a single absorption trough with a fixed ionization parameter, so the quantitative claims (vout, NH, Lkin/Lbol) are conditional on that assumption until the degeneracy tests requested below are performed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Table 1, Section 4.2] The identification of the 7.1-7.4 keV trough as Fe XXVI Ly-alpha at 14,300 km/s is the load-bearing step for the paper's headline claim, but log xi for Comp. X is fixed at 4.0 'so that it produces only Fe xxvi' because the ionization parameter 'cannot be tightly constrained through spectral fitting' (Section 3.3). The quoted NH = (1.07 +/- 0.14) x 10^24 cm^-2 is therefore not an independent measurement: it is the column required under one adopted ionization solution, and the paper's own statement in Section 4.1 that 'a higher xi would require an even greater NH' confirms that NH is a lower limit under that assumption. Because the feature is seen as a single unresolved trough (S/N ~ 6, Delta C = 30), alternative models with Fe XXV at a different blueshift, a blend of Fe XXV and Fe XXVI at intermediate velocities, or different turbulent widths can plausibly reproduce the trough with different vout, NH, and hence a different Lkin/Lbol. I request that the authors fit the feature with log xi free (or stepped) within the pion grid, explicitly include Fe XXV-dominated solutions, and report the resulting range of vout, NH, and Lkin/Lbol, so that the 0.05c and 0.8-3% Lbol claims are not conditional on a single fixed parameter.
  2. [Section 3.2] All ionic abundances are computed from pion tables generated with the 2001 unobscured SED of Mehdipour et al. (2017), while the data are from 2024. The paper asserts that this SED is 'consistent with the intrinsic UV and X-ray continuum of our observation,' but no quantitative consistency test or sensitivity analysis is presented. The ionization balance of every component, and in particular the Fe XXV/Fe XXVI ratio that underpins the Comp. X identification, depends on the shape and normalization of the ionizing continuum. I request a sensitivity test in which the pion tables are recomputed for a harder and a softer ionizing SED (bounded by the simultaneous 2024 XMM-Newton/NuSTAR/Swift observations) and the resulting shifts in xi, NH, and the Fe-ion fractions of Comp. X are reported. If the Comp. X identification survives only for the 2001 SED, that condition must be stated in the abstract and conclusions.
  3. [Section 3.2, Section 4.2] The assumption of full covering for all xabs components is stated without a test: 'We assumed full covering fractions for all xabs components, as this already provides a good fit to all lines in the Resolve spectrum.' For the five narrow components this is a modest effect, but for Comp. X the product of NH and covering fraction is what is actually constrained by the trough depth; a partial-covering solution with a smaller NH could in principle reproduce the same feature. Since the kinetic luminosity in Section 4.2 scales linearly with NH (Lkin = 1/2 mu mp NH R Omega CV vout^3) and already depends on the adopted fiducial values Omega = 2 pi and CV = 0.2, the 0.8-3% Lbol range is really a range within a specific set of priors. I request that the authors test partial covering for Comp. X (and, if feasible, for the other components) and quote how Lkin/Lbol changes, or explicitly justify why full coverage is required by the line profiles.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3, Fig. 2 caption] The Xtend comparison shows that the Resolve-derived Comp. X model, convolved with the Xtend response, is consistent with the Xtend spectrum; it is not an independent detection of Fe XXVI, since the model parameters were fixed from Resolve. The present wording in the caption is acceptable, but consider clarifying that the red curve is a consistency check rather than an independent confirmation of the ion identification.
  2. [Section 4.1] The sentence 'we emphasize that the significant increase in NH due to Comp. X is robust, despite its ionization parameter being fixed to the minimum feasible xi' combines a robustness claim with an explicit admission that log xi is fixed at the minimum feasible value and that NH would increase for higher xi. This should be rephrased so the derived NH is presented as a lower limit under the adopted ionization assumption, not as a robust measurement.
  3. [Section 4.2 and Section 5] The 'hybrid wind' interpretation is presented as supported by the data but is post-hoc in the sense that the wind model is compared with the derived parameters rather than fitted to the spectra. This is fine, but the conclusion section should retain the cautious wording ('suggest', 'consistent with') used in the discussion.
  4. [Table 1] For Comp. X, sigma_v = 3500 +/- 1000 km/s is reported with an uncertainty that is nearly a third of the fitted value; consider reporting the 68% confidence contour in the (sigma_v, vout) plane or stating explicitly that these two parameters are strongly correlated for a single broad trough.
  5. [Author affiliations (page 1)] There is a typographical error in the affiliation list: 'Harrisonburg, V A 22807' should read 'Harrisonburg, VA 22807'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: outflow parameters are fitted to XRISM data against external atomic data; the Fe XXVI identification rests on a fixed-ionization assumption but is not an input-equal-output reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a spectral fit: the continuum and emission lines are modeled, and six xabs absorption components are fitted with free xi, NH, vout, and sigma_v. Line energies are taken from NIST and FAC, i.e., external atomic data. The only fixed ionization parameter is Comp. X's log xi = 4.0, chosen because a single broad feature cannot constrain xi; the paper explicitly says the feature is 'consistent with' Fe XXVI, not that the identity is uniquely derived. The reported outflow velocity of 14,300 km/s follows from the centroid of the 7.1-7.4 keV trough once the Fe XXVI rest energy is assumed, and NH is fitted from the line depth. Lkin is then computed with a standard formula using adopted Omega, C_V, and R limits; it is a derived quantity, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The hybrid-wind interpretation in Section 4.2 is a post-hoc comparison with wind models and does not feed back into the fit. The self-cited 2001 SED (Mehdipour et al. 2017) and the SPEX/pion modeling tools are inputs or infrastructure, not conclusions obtained from the target result. The possibility that the trough could be Fe XXV or a blend is a model-degeneracy caveat, not circularity, because the paper does not claim uniqueness. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs; the score reflects only minor self-citation of the adopted SED and spectral-fitting code.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumed ionizing SED, full covering, and adopted geometric parameters (Omega, CV, MBH) from the literature; no new physical entities are introduced. The most load-bearing choices are the fixed xi of Comp. X and the 2001 SED.

free parameters (6)
  • Comp. X ionization parameter = log xi = 4.0 (fixed)
    Cannot be constrained from a single absorption line; set to the minimum value that produces Fe XXVI. This directly sets the derived NH and the kinetic luminosity estimate.
  • Covering fraction of all xabs components = 1.0 (assumed)
    Full covering assumed for all six components; if partial, NH and possibly xi would increase, and the Lkin estimate would scale with covering factor.
  • Ionizing SED epoch = 2001 unobscured SED (adopted)
    Photoionization models use the 2001 epoch SED from Mehdipour et al. (2017); a different 2024 SED would shift xi and NH.
  • Volume filling factor CV = 0.2 (adopted from PDS 456)
    Scales the density and mass outflow rate; used in Lkin estimate.
  • Solid angle Omega = 2 pi (adopted)
    Scales the mass outflow rate; value from Crenshaw & Kraemer (2012).
  • Black hole mass MBH = 2.82e7 Msun (Bentz et al. 2021)
    Determines the minimum radius from escape velocity, one of the two bounds used in the Lkin range.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The photoionization code pion in SPEX accurately computes ionic column densities and absorption spectra for the assumed SED.
    Invoked in Section 3.2; the derived xi and NH depend on this.
  • domain assumption Atomic line energies from NIST and FAC are accurate to about 1 eV.
    Section 3.3; line identifications and velocities depend on these energies.
  • domain assumption The XRISM Resolve energy scale calibration (0.34 eV systematic in 5.4-8.0 keV) is correct as described.
    Section 2.1; velocities are measured from line centroids relative to this scale.
  • domain assumption The observed gas is in photoionization equilibrium (not collisional) with the adopted SED.
    Section 3.2; the xabs/pion model assumes photoionization equilibrium.
  • domain assumption The continuum is well described by a single power law plus a fixed warm Comptonization component.
    Section 3.1; if the continuum shape differed, residual features could be misinterpreted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Delving into the depths of NGC 3783 with XRISM. I. Kinematic and ionization structure of the highly ionized outflows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AGOOXCV3

@misc{pith2026250609395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Delving into the depths of NGC 3783 with XRISM. I. Kinematic and ionization structure of the highly ionized outflows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AGOOXCV3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09395}
}
abstract

We present our study of the XRISM observation of the Seyfert-1 galaxy NGC 3783. XRISM's Resolve microcalorimeter has enabled, for the first time, a detailed characterization of the highly ionized outflows in this active galactic nucleus. Our analysis constrains their outflow and turbulent velocities, along with their ionization parameter ($\xi$) and column density ($N_{\rm H}$). The high-resolution Resolve spectrum reveals a distinct series of Fe absorption lines between 6.4 and 7.8 keV, ranging from Fe XVIII to Fe XXVI. At lower energies, absorption features from Si, S, and Ar are also detected. Our spectroscopy and photoionization modeling of the time-averaged Resolve spectrum uncovers six outflow components, five of which exhibit relatively narrow absorption lines with outflow velocities ranging from 560 to 1170 km/s. In addition, a broad absorption feature is detected, which is consistent with Fe XXVI outflowing at 14,300 km/s (0.05 $c$). The kinetic luminosity of this component is 0.8-3% of the bolometric luminosity. Our analysis of the Resolve spectrum shows that more highly ionized absorption lines are intrinsically broader than those of lower-ionization species, indicating that the turbulent velocity of the six outflow components (ranging from 0 to 3500 km/s) increases with $\xi$. Furthermore, we find that the $N_{\rm H}$ of the outflows generally declines with $\xi$ up to $\log \xi = 3.2$ but rises beyond this point, suggesting a complex ionization structure. The absorption profile of the Fe XXV resonance line is intriguingly similar to UV absorption lines (Ly$\alpha$ and C IV) observed by the HST, from which we infer that the outflows are clumpy in nature. Our XRISM/Resolve results support a "hybrid wind" scenario in which the observed outflows have multiple origins and driving mechanisms. We explore various interpretations of our findings within AGN wind models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09395 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. XRISM/Resolve spectrum of NGC 3783 with our best-fit model. The top two panels show the full spectrum and the corresponding fit residuals. The bottom two panels provide a close-up view of the Fe K band and its fit residuals. For clarity of display, the spectrum is additionally binned up. The strongest emission and absorption features are labeled. Our best-fit model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. XRISM/Xtend spectrum of NGC 3783 in the region of the broad Fe xxvi absorption feature of Comp. X. The Xtend data points are shown in black. Our best-fit model to the Resolve spectrum ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Transmission model of the six outflow components. The spectra correspond to the best-fit model parameters of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Absorption profile of the Fe xxv resonance line in the XRISM Resolve spectrum compared to those of Lyα and Civ in the 2024 HST COS spectrum. The data are normalized to the continuum, showing the flux ratio on the y-axis. The red model in the middle panel corresponds to…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relations between the parameters of the six outflow compo￾nents derived from the XRISM Resolve spectrum of NGC 3783. The top panel displays the column density (NH) and the AMD as functions of the ionization parameter (log ξ). The middle and bottom panels show the turbu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fe K$\alpha$ line from the Broad Line Region of PDS456 with XRISM/Resolve

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    XRISM/Resolve reveals a narrow, blueshifted neutral Fe Kα line (EW ≈ 9 eV, v_out ≈ 2700 km/s) in quasar PDS 456, likely from the outer Broad Line Region at the high-luminosity end of the X-ray Baldwin effect.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P., Ró˙ za´nska, A., Hryniewicz, K., Czerny, B., & Behar, E

    Adhikari, T. P., Ró˙ za´nska, A., Hryniewicz, K., Czerny, B., & Behar, E. 2019, ApJ, 881, 78

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    2009, ApJ, 703, 1346

    Behar, E. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1346

    2009

  3. [3]

    P., Blustin, A

    Behar, E., Rasmussen, A. P., Blustin, A. J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 598, 232

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    C., Williams, P

    Bentz, M. C., Williams, P. R., Street, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 112

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    J., Page, M

    Blustin, A. J., Page, M. J., Fuerst, S. V ., Branduardi-Raymont, G., & Ashton, C. E. 2005, A&A, 431, 111

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    R., Davis, J

    Canizares, C. R., Davis, J. E., Dewey, D., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1144

    2005

  7. [7]

    2022, A&A, 659, A161

    Costanzo, D., Dadina, M., Vignali, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A161

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Crenshaw, D. M. & Kraemer, S. B. 2012, ApJ, 753, 75

    work page 2012

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    C., Proga, D., Waters, T., & Dyda, S

    Dannen, R. C., Proga, D., Waters, T., & Dyda, S. 2020, ApJ, 893, L34 de Plaa, J., Kaastra, J. S., Tamura, T., et al. 2004, A&A, 423, 49

    2020

  2. [10]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 4161

    Dyda, S., Dannen, R., Waters, T., & Proga, D. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 4161

    2017

  3. [11]

    E., Brown, G

    Eckart, M. E., Brown, G. V ., Chiao, M. P., et al. 2024, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, & K. Nakazawa, V ol. 13093, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 130931P

    2024

  4. [12]

    2018, The Spectral Resolution of the COS FUV channel at Lifetime Position 4, Instrument Science Report COS 2018-7

    Fox, A., James, B., Roman-Duval, J., Rafelski, M., & Sonnentrucker, P. 2018, The Spectral Resolution of the COS FUV channel at Lifetime Position 4, Instrument Science Report COS 2018-7

    2018

  5. [13]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 6

    Fukumura, K., Dadina, M., Matzeu, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 6

    2022

  6. [14]

    2010, ApJ, 715, 636

    Fukumura, K., Kazanas, D., Contopoulos, I., & Behar, E. 2010, ApJ, 715, 636

    2010

  7. [15]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0062

    Fukumura, K., Kazanas, D., Shrader, C., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0062

    2017

  8. [16]

    2024, ApJ, 968, 70

    Fukumura, K., Mehdipour, M., Behar, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 70

    2024

  9. [17]

    2015, ApJ, 805, 17

    Fukumura, K., Tombesi, F., Kazanas, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 17

    2015

  10. [18]

    R., Kraemer, S

    Gabel, J. R., Kraemer, S. B., Crenshaw, D. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 631, 741

    2005

  11. [19]

    C., Miller, J

    Gallo, L. C., Miller, J. M., & Costantini, E. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.10930

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    2021, ApJ, 914, 114

    Ganguly, S., Proga, D., Waters, T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 114

    2021

  13. [21]

    & S˛ adowski, A

    Gaspari, M. & S˛ adowski, A. 2017, ApJ, 837, 149

    2017

  14. [22]

    & Proga, D

    Giustini, M. & Proga, D. 2019, A&A, 630, A94

    2019

  15. [23]

    C., Froning, C

    Green, J. C., Froning, C. S., Osterman, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 60

    2012

  16. [24]

    2023, A&A, 679, A43

    Gu, L., Kaastra, J., Rogantini, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A43

    2023

  17. [25]

    Gu, M. F. 2008, Canadian Journal of Physics, 86, 675

    2008

  18. [26]

    2007, ApJ, 663, 799

    Holczer, T., Behar, E., & Kaspi, S. 2007, ApJ, 663, 799

    2007

  19. [27]

    Hopkins, P. F. & Elvis, M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 7

    2010

  20. [28]

    2018, Journal of Astronomical Tele- scopes, Instruments, and Systems, 4, 011217

    Ishisaki, Y ., Yamada, S., Seta, H., et al. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Tele- scopes, Instruments, and Systems, 4, 011217

    2018

  21. [29]

    Kaastra, J. S. & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151

    2016

  22. [30]

    S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H

    Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spec- troscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. K. Yamashita & T. Watanabe (Tokyo: Univ. Academy Press), 411–414

    1996

  23. [31]

    S., Raassen, A

    Kaastra, J. S., Raassen, A. J. J., de Plaa, J., & Gu, L. 2024, SPEX X-ray spectral fitting package v3.08.01, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 12771915

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    N., George, I

    Kaspi, S., Brandt, W. N., George, I. M., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 643

    2002

  25. [33]

    & Pounds, K

    King, A. & Pounds, K. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 115

    2015

  26. [34]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd . National Institute of Standards and Technology,

    2024

  27. [35]

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F

    Gaithersburg, MD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F

    doi

  28. [36]

    A., Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J

    Kriss, G. A., Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A12

    2019

  29. [37]

    S., et al

    Krongold, Y ., Nicastro, F., Brickhouse, N. S., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, 832

    2003

  30. [38]

    S., Elvis, M., & Mathur, S

    Krongold, Y ., Nicastro, F., Brickhouse, N. S., Elvis, M., & Mathur, S. 2005, ApJ, 622, 842

    2005

  31. [39]

    C., Chakravorty, S., & Kembhavi, A

    Laha, S., Guainazzi, M., Dewangan, G. C., Chakravorty, S., & Kembhavi, A. K. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2613

    2014

  32. [40]

    S., Reeves, J., et al

    Laha, S., Reynolds, C. S., Reeves, J., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 13

    2021

  33. [41]

    S., Gu, L., et al

    Li, C., Kaastra, J. S., Gu, L., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A302 Li et al. 2025b, A&A

    2025

  34. [42]

    Lodders, K., Palme, H., & Gail, H. P. 2009, Landolt Börnstein, 4B, 712

    2009

  35. [43]

    & Zdziarski, A

    Magdziarz, P. & Zdziarski, A. A. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 837

    1995

  36. [44]

    S., et al

    Mao, J., Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A99

    2019

  37. [45]

    S., & Kallman, T

    Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., & Kallman, T. 2016, A&A, 596, A65

    2016

  38. [46]

    S., Kriss, G

    Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., Kriss, G. A., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A28

    2017

  39. [47]

    A., Kaastra, J

    Mehdipour, M., Kriss, G. A., Kaastra, J. S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 155

    2024

  40. [48]

    M., Kaastra, J

    Miller, J. M., Kaastra, J. S., Miller, M. C., et al. 2015, Nature, 526, 542

    2015

  41. [49]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 1152

    Mizumoto, M., Done, C., Tomaru, R., & Edwards, I. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 1152

    2019

  42. [50]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 1442

    Mizumoto, M., Nomura, M., Done, C., Ohsuga, K., & Odaka, H. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1442

    2021

  43. [51]

    A., et al

    Mochizuki, Y ., Tsujimoto, M., Kilbourne, C. A., et al. 2025, Journal of Astro- nomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11, 042002

    2025

  44. [52]

    M., Lockman, F

    Murphy, E. M., Lockman, F. J., Laor, A., & Elvis, M. 1996, ApJS, 105, 369

    1996

  45. [53]

    Murphy, K. D. & Yaqoob, T. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1549

    2009

  46. [54]

    2025, PASJ[arXiv:2502.08030]

    Noda, H., Mori, K., Tomida, H., et al. 2025, PASJ[arXiv:2502.08030]

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    S., Kilbourne, C

    Porter, F. S., Kilbourne, C. A., Chiao, M., et al. 2024, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, & K. Nakazawa, V ol. 13093, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 130931K

    2024

  48. [56]

    M., & Kallman, T

    Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. 2000, ApJ, 543, 686

    2000

  49. [57]

    N., Nandra, K., George, I

    Reeves, J. N., Nandra, K., George, I. M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 602, 648

    2004

  50. [58]

    E., Brandt, W

    Scott, A. E., Brandt, W. N., Behar, E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 105

    2014

  51. [59]

    C., Kaastra, J

    Steenbrugge, K. C., Kaastra, J. S., Crenshaw, D. M., et al. 2005, A&A, 434, 569

    2005

  52. [60]

    C., Kaastra, J

    Steenbrugge, K. C., Kaastra, J. S., de Vries, C. P., & Edelson, R. 2003, A&A, 402, 477

    2003

  53. [61]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 3011 Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al

    Stern, J., Behar, E., Laor, A., Baskin, A., & Holczer, T. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3011 Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18

    2014

  54. [62]

    2013, PASJ, 65, 88

    Takeuchi, S., Ohsuga, K., & Mineshige, S. 2013, PASJ, 65, 88

    2013

  55. [63]

    2025, PASJ

    Tashiro, M., Kelley, R., Watanabe, S., et al. 2025, PASJ

    2025

  56. [64]

    2020, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Tashiro, M., Maejima, H., Toda, K., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical In- strumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 11444, Space Tele- scopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den

    2020

  57. [65]

    1998, A&AS, 130, 333

    Theureau, G., Bottinelli, L., Coudreau-Durand, N., et al. 1998, A&AS, 130, 333

    1998

  58. [66]

    N., et al

    Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, A57

    2010

  59. [67]

    Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27

    2001

  60. [68]

    2021, ApJ, 914, 62

    Waters, T., Proga, D., & Dannen, R. 2021, ApJ, 914, 62

    2021

  61. [69]

    2022, ApJ, 931, 134 XRISM Collaboration

    Waters, T., Proga, D., Dannen, R., & Dyda, S. 2022, ApJ, 931, 134 XRISM Collaboration. 2025c, Paper II, A&A XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, L25 XRISM Collaboration, Audard, M., Awaki, H., et al. 2025, Nature, 641, 1132 XRISM TTWOF. 2025, Thin...

    2022

  62. [70]

    2024, ApJS, 274, 8

    Yamada, S., Kawamuro, T., Mizumoto, M., et al. 2024, ApJS, 274, 8

    2024

  63. [71]

    N., Markowitz, A., Serlemitsos, P

    Yaqoob, T., Reeves, J. N., Markowitz, A., Serlemitsos, P. J., & Padmanabhan, U. 2005, ApJ, 627, 156

    2005

  64. [72]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 91

    Zaidouni, F., Kara, E., Kosec, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 91

    2024

  65. [73]

    T., Done, C., & Smith, D

    Zycki, P. T., Done, C., & Smith, D. A. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 231 Article number, page 9 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa55623-25_final 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 Observed Energy (keV) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 counts s 1 keV 1 NXB NGC 3783 XRISM/Resolve Fig. A.1. Comparison of the count rate spect...

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.