Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Modality Reliability Guided Multimodal Recommendation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.16524 v1 pith:AI4PMLHK submitted 2025-04-23 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords modalityreliabilityrecommendationsupervisionweightsmultimodalbetterdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal recommendation faces an issue of the performance degradation that the uni-modal recommendation sometimes achieves the better performance. A possible reason is that the unreliable item modality data hurts the fusion result. Several existing studies have introduced weights for different modalities to reduce the contribution of the unreliable modality data in predicting the final user rating. However, they fail to provide appropriate supervisions for learning the modality weights, making the learned weights imprecise. Therefore, we propose a modality reliability guided multimodal recommendation framework that uniquely learns the modality weights supervised by the modality reliability. Considering that there is no explicit label provided for modality reliability, we resort to automatically identify it through the BPR recommendation objective. In particular, we define a modality reliability vector as the supervision label by the difference between modality-specific user ratings to positive and negative items, where a larger difference indicates a higher reliability of the modality as the BPR objective is better satisfied. Furthermore, to enhance the effectiveness of the supervision, we calculate the confidence level for the modality reliability vector, which dynamically adjusts the supervision strength and eliminates the harmful supervision. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is Personalized Modality Weighting Actually Personalized? A Controlled Audit of Per-User Weighting Claims in Multimodal Recommenders

    cs.IR 2026-08 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Per-user modality weighting does not beat a single global modality weight once conditions are matched, and eval-time shuffle controls overstate personalization.

Pith tools